Notebookcheck

华为 Nova 智能手机简短评测

Manuel Masiero (translated by Delta Zhang), 01/28/2017
Android Smartphone Touchscreen

简单的选择。 就像同系列5.5英寸的Nova Plus一样,华为Nova在制造工艺方面几乎达到了高端产品的水平。而且实际上,这台5英寸的手机在测试中展现出了更多的功能并且给了中端竞品很大的压力。

Huawei Nova (Nova Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 2 GHz
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 506
Memory
3072 MB 
, LPDDR3
Display
5 inch 16:9, 1920x1080 pixel 443 PPI, IPS, glossy: yes
Storage
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 22.7 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5-mm 音频接口, Card Reader: 最大128GB micro-SD 储存卡, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 霍尔传感器, 指纹识别器, 距离传感器, 环境亮度传感器, 罗盘, 加速度传感器, 陀螺仪, USB OTG
Networking
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.1, GSM (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), UMTS (850, 900, 1900, 2100 MHz), LTE Cat.6 (800, 900, 1800, 2100, 2600 MHz), download max. 300 MBit/s, upload max. 50 MBit/s, nano-SIM, head-SAR: 0.99 W/kg, body-SAR: 0.94 W/kg, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7.1 x 141.2 x 69.1
Battery
13.29 Wh, 3020 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Android 6.0 Marshmallow
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix f/2,2, 拍照最大 4032 x 3016 像素, 录像最大 3840 x 2160 像素, 自动对焦, LED 闪光灯
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix f/2,0, 拍照最大 3264 x 2448 像素
Additional features
Speakers: 单扬声器, Keyboard: 虚拟键盘, Keyboard Light: yes, 模块化电源适配器, USB Type-C 线缆, SIM 卡工具, 耳机, 快速入门指南, Google apps, Facebook, Twitter, WPS Office, 24 Months Warranty, , fanless
Weight
146 g, Power Supply: 35 g

 

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
ZTE Axon 7
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
337 MBit/s ∼100% +1585%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
121 MBit/s ∼36% +505%
Huawei Nova Plus
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 2.4 GHz)
53.4 MBit/s ∼16% +167%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
32.9 MBit/s ∼10% +65%
Huawei Nova
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 2.4 GHz)
20 MBit/s ∼6%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
ZTE Axon 7
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
298 MBit/s ∼100% +485%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
112 MBit/s ∼38% +120%
Huawei Nova Plus
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 2.4 GHz)
51.5 MBit/s ∼17% +1%
Huawei Nova
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 2.4 GHz)
50.9 MBit/s ∼17%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
31.2 MBit/s ∼10% -39%
Huawei Nova: total route
Huawei Nova: total route
Huawei Nova: turning point
Huawei Nova: turning point
Huawei Nova: bridge
Huawei Nova: bridge
Garmin Edge 500: total route
Garmin Edge 500: total route
Garmin Edge 500: turning point
Garmin Edge 500: turning point
Garmin Edge 500: bridge
Garmin Edge 500: bridge

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the zoom step. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
469
cd/m²
483
cd/m²
495
cd/m²
477
cd/m²
493
cd/m²
501
cd/m²
469
cd/m²
481
cd/m²
499
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 501 cd/m² Average: 485.2 cd/m² Minimum: 4.22 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 94 %
Center on Battery: 493 cd/m²
Contrast: 1120:1 (Black: 0.44 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.2 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 3.8 | - Ø
Gamma: 2.39
Huawei Nova
IPS, 1920x1080, 5
Lenovo Moto Z Play
AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
ZTE Axon 7
AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
Super AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.2
Huawei Nova Plus
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
Screen
25%
-17%
-5%
20%
-10%
Brightness
485
511
5%
633
31%
334
-31%
380
-22%
481
-1%
Brightness Distribution
94
93
-1%
93
-1%
88
-6%
91
-3%
90
-4%
Black Level *
0.44
0.66
-50%
0.5
-14%
Contrast
1120
997
-11%
970
-13%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.2
2.2
48%
4.9
-17%
4.6
-10%
1.95
54%
4.2
-0%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.8
2
47%
5.8
-53%
2.8
26%
1.86
51%
4.8
-26%
Gamma
2.39 100%
2.25 107%
2.26 106%
2.29 105%
2.13 113%
2.36 102%
CCT
7438 87%
6768 96%
7840 83%
6612 98%
6376 102%
7568 86%

* ... smaller is better

ColorChecker (color temperature standard; target color space: sRGB)
ColorChecker (color temperature standard; target color space: sRGB)
ColorChecker (color temperature warm; target color space: sRGB)
ColorChecker (color temperature warm; target color space: sRGB)
Colorspace (color temperature standard; target color space: sRGB)
Colorspace (color temperature standard; target color space: sRGB)
Colorspace (color temperature warm; target color space: AdobeRGB)
Colorspace (color temperature warm; target color space: AdobeRGB)
Grayscale (color temperature standard; target color space: sRGB)
Grayscale (color temperature standard; target color space: sRGB)
Grayscale (color temperature warm; target color space: sRGB)
Grayscale (color temperature warm; target color space: sRGB)
Saturation Sweeps (color temperature standard; target color space: sRGB)
Saturation Sweeps (color temperature standard; target color space: sRGB)
Saturation Sweeps (color temperature warm; target color space: AdobeRGB)
Saturation Sweeps (color temperature warm; target color space: AdobeRGB)

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 2500 Hz1 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 2500 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 1 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 2500 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 60 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 965 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 30860) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
44 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 10.8 ms rise
↘ 33.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 96 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (27.3 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
58.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 16 ms rise
↘ 42.8 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 92 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (44.3 ms).
AnTuTu Benchmark v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei Nova
63206 Points ∼34%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
61345 Points ∼33% -3%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL (6.2.1)
62484 Points ∼34% -1%
ZTE Axon 7
122524 Points ∼66% +94%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
41676 Points ∼23% -34%
Huawei Nova Plus
64601 Points ∼35% +2%
Geekbench 4
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei Nova
2984 Points ∼11%
Lenovo Moto Z Play (32 Bit)
2525 Points ∼9% -15%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
4042 Points ∼15% +35%
ZTE Axon 7
3867 Points ∼14% +30%
Huawei Nova Plus
3156 Points ∼12% +6%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei Nova
840 Points ∼15%
Lenovo Moto Z Play (32 Bit)
795 Points ∼15% -5%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
820 Points ∼15% -2%
ZTE Axon 7
1280 Points ∼23% +52%
Huawei Nova Plus
845 Points ∼15% +1%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Nova
1802 Points ∼71%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
1636 Points ∼64% -9%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
2109 Points ∼83% +17%
ZTE Axon 7
1783 Points ∼70% -1%
Huawei Nova Plus
1773 Points ∼69% -2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Nova
391 Points ∼7%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
382 Points ∼7% -2%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
380 Points ∼7% -3%
ZTE Axon 7
2528 Points ∼47% +547%
Huawei Nova Plus
384 Points ∼7% -2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Huawei Nova
473 Points ∼12%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
461 Points ∼12% -3%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
465 Points ∼12% -2%
ZTE Axon 7
2500 Points ∼64% +429%
Huawei Nova Plus
465 Points ∼12% -2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Nova
1821 Points ∼70%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
1631 Points ∼63% -10%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
2112 Points ∼82% +16%
ZTE Axon 7
1099 Points ∼42% -40%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
1479 Points ∼57% -19%
Huawei Nova Plus
1795 Points ∼69% -1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Nova
737 Points ∼10%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
725 Points ∼9% -2%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
719 Points ∼9% -2%
ZTE Axon 7
4619 Points ∼60% +527%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
275 Points ∼4% -63%
Huawei Nova Plus
733 Points ∼9% -1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Huawei Nova
849 Points ∼17%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
827 Points ∼17% -3%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
842 Points ∼17% -1%
ZTE Axon 7
2698 Points ∼55% +218%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
336 Points ∼7% -60%
Huawei Nova Plus
844 Points ∼17% -1%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z Play
15923 Points ∼23%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
15984 Points ∼23%
ZTE Axon 7
20408 Points ∼30%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
9495 Points ∼14%
Huawei Nova Plus
15823 Points ∼23%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z Play
13437 Points ∼3%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
13466 Points ∼3%
ZTE Axon 7
24310 Points ∼5%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
7542 Points ∼2%
Huawei Nova Plus
13412 Points ∼3%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z Play
13920 Points ∼7%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
13955 Points ∼7%
ZTE Axon 7
23319 Points ∼12%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
7903 Points ∼4%
Huawei Nova Plus
13882 Points ∼7%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Huawei Nova
23 fps ∼2%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
23 fps ∼2% 0%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
23 fps ∼2% 0%
ZTE Axon 7
88 fps ∼7% +283%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
14 fps ∼1% -39%
Huawei Nova Plus
23 fps ∼2% 0%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Huawei Nova
22 fps ∼5%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
23 fps ∼5% +5%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
21 fps ∼5% -5%
ZTE Axon 7
53 fps ∼12% +141%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
14 fps ∼3% -36%
Huawei Nova Plus
23 fps ∼5% +5%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Huawei Nova
9.8 fps ∼2%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
10 fps ∼2% +2%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
9.9 fps ∼2% +1%
ZTE Axon 7
39 fps ∼7% +298%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
3.8 fps ∼1% -61%
Huawei Nova Plus
9.9 fps ∼2% +1%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Huawei Nova
10 fps ∼4%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
10 fps ∼4% 0%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
9.7 fps ∼4% -3%
ZTE Axon 7
28 fps ∼12% +180%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
3.8 fps ∼2% -62%
Huawei Nova Plus
10 fps ∼4% 0%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Nova
6.2 fps ∼1%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
6.2 fps ∼1% 0%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
6.2 fps ∼1% 0%
ZTE Axon 7
31 fps ∼7% +400%
Huawei Nova Plus
6.2 fps ∼1% 0%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Nova
6.6 fps ∼4%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
6.7 fps ∼4% +2%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
6.1 fps ∼3% -8%
ZTE Axon 7
16 fps ∼9% +142%
Huawei Nova Plus
6.6 fps ∼4% 0%
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
Huawei Nova
4596 Points ∼57%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
6767 Points ∼83% +47%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
6785 Points ∼84% +48%
ZTE Axon 7
4970 Points ∼61% +8%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
4008 Points ∼49% -13%
Huawei Nova Plus
5724 Points ∼70% +25%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Huawei Nova
727 Points ∼47%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
649 Points ∼42% -11%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
702 Points ∼46% -3%
ZTE Axon 7
963 Points ∼62% +32%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
741 Points ∼48% +2%
Huawei Nova Plus
754 Points ∼49% +4%
Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Nova
1006 Points ∼12%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
1013 Points ∼12% +1%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
1019 Points ∼12% +1%
ZTE Axon 7
4631 Points ∼54% +360%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
488 Points ∼6% -51%
Huawei Nova Plus
1015 Points ∼12% +1%
Memory (sort by value)
Huawei Nova
1531 Points ∼40%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
795 Points ∼21% -48%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
1042 Points ∼27% -32%
ZTE Axon 7
1489 Points ∼39% -3%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
554 Points ∼14% -64%
Huawei Nova Plus
1553 Points ∼40% +1%
System (sort by value)
Huawei Nova
2280 Points ∼35%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
2069 Points ∼31% -9%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
2923 Points ∼44% +28%
ZTE Axon 7
3307 Points ∼50% +45%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
2153 Points ∼33% -6%
Huawei Nova Plus
2132 Points ∼32% -6%
Overall (sort by value)
Huawei Nova
1264 Points ∼39%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
1019 Points ∼31% -19%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
1215 Points ∼37% -4%
ZTE Axon 7
2165 Points ∼66% +71%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
810 Points ∼25% -36%
Huawei Nova Plus
1262 Points ∼38% 0%

Legend

 
Huawei Nova Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Lenovo Moto Z Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
ZTE Axon 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 Samsung Exynos 7580 Octa, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei Nova Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei Nova (Chrome 55.0.2883.91)
4717 Points ∼10%
Lenovo Moto Z Play (Chrome 53)
4979 Points ∼10% +6%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL (Chrome 53.0.2785.124)
4905 Points ∼10% +4%
ZTE Axon 7 (Chrome 53.0.2785.124)
8062 Points ∼16% +71%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 (Chrome 38)
3611 Points ∼7% -23%
Huawei Nova Plus (Chrome 53)
4730 Points ∼10% 0%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei Nova (Chrome 55.0.2883.91)
8234.9 ms * ∼14%
Lenovo Moto Z Play (Chrome 53)
8168.9 ms * ∼14% +1%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL (Chrome 53.0.2785.124)
8041.4 ms * ∼14% +2%
ZTE Axon 7 (Chrome 53.0.2785.124)
3096.5 ms * ∼5% +62%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 (Chrome 38)
11887 ms * ∼20% -44%
Huawei Nova Plus (Chrome 53)
8027.7 ms * ∼13% +3%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score (sort by value)
Huawei Nova (Chrome 55.0.2883.91)
60 Points ∼10%
Lenovo Moto Z Play (Chrome 53)
83 Points ∼14% +38%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL (Chrome 53.0.2785.124)
84 Points ∼15% +40%
ZTE Axon 7 (Chrome 53.0.2785.124)
111 Points ∼19% +85%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 (Chrome 38)
64 Points ∼11% +7%
Huawei Nova Plus (Chrome 53)
83 Points ∼14% +38%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei Nova (Chrome 55.0.2883.91)
30.487 Points ∼10%
Lenovo Moto Z Play (Chrome 53)
31.8 Points ∼10% +4%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL (Chrome 53.0.2785.124)
31.118 Points ∼10% +2%
ZTE Axon 7 (Chrome 53.0.2785.124)
44.754 Points ∼14% +47%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 (Chrome 38)
22 Points ∼7% -28%
Huawei Nova Plus (Chrome 53)
31.3 Points ∼10% +3%

* ... smaller is better

Huawei NovaLenovo Moto Z PlayAsus Zenfone 3 ZE552KLZTE Axon 7Samsung Galaxy A5 2016Huawei Nova Plus
AndroBench 3-5
1%
30%
54%
-38%
-19%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
47.69 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
50.57 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
6%
50.07 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
5%
51.34 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
8%
33.32 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-30%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
79.5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
74.58 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-6%
79.22 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
0%
78.39 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-1%
41.64 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-48%
Random Write 4KB
44.63
45.58
2%
7.4
-83%
16.22
-64%
11.2
-75%
30.12
-33%
Random Read 4KB
38.19
38.78
2%
74
94%
121.07
217%
22.9
-40%
35.64
-7%
Sequential Write 256KB
75.01
73.14
-2%
188
151%
150.92
101%
60.4
-19%
82.13
9%
Sequential Read 256KB
248.26
254.78
3%
282
14%
406.49
64%
209.4
-16%
241.57
-3%
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 SettingsValue
 high30 fps
 very low30 fps
in comparison
Samsung Galaxy J1 2016 (min)
 3475 Quad, Mali-T720
12
   ...
Lenovo P2
 625, Adreno 506
30
Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL
 821 MSM8996 Pro, Adreno 530
30
Huawei Nova
 625, Adreno 506
30
OnePlus 3T
 821 MSM8996 Pro, Adreno 530
30
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
 7870 Octa, Mali-T830 MP2
30
   ...
HTC 10 (max)
 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
48
Dead Trigger 2
 SettingsValue
 high53 fps
Max. Load
 38.8 °C38.9 °C41.4 °C 
 38.7 °C38.4 °C40.6 °C 
 36.4 °C37.6 °C40.7 °C 
Maximum: 41.4 °C
Average: 39.1 °C
33 °C33.5 °C35.1 °C
33 °C33.6 °C34.4 °C
33 °C33.7 °C34.2 °C
Maximum: 35.1 °C
Average: 33.7 °C
Power Supply (max.)  32.2 °C | Room Temperature 21.4 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.642.92525.433.83125.327.84032.933.25033.641.76331.631.98028.431.8100272612520.824.71602228.620021.336.525020.85031521.25540019.45750019.556.563017.757.380017.963.8100017.870.5125017.372.3160017.474.8200016.778250017.276.9315018.279.4400017.981.4500017.678.2630017.774.2800017.873.91000017.968.61250018.170.81600018.268SPL3088.3N1.366.5median 17.9Huawei Novamedian 68.6Delta1.312.131.640.525.432.925.334.132.932.933.635.931.633.628.430.7272620.826.82229.521.336.920.846.921.251.819.456.919.561.617.76417.969.317.869.517.372.917.471.116.770.617.268.918.273.817.97617.669.417.771.617.873.517.971.118.170.418.268.23083.71.356.5median 17.9Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KLmedian 69.31.310.131.64225.437.625.331.432.936.333.651.731.634.328.431.72736.920.8262229.921.341.820.853.921.259.419.463.619.567.417.766.117.970.117.869.817.373.417.474.616.776.717.277.218.278.917.979.617.67617.772.917.873.217.971.118.164.518.257.23087.41.368.4median 17.9Huawei Nova Plusmedian 69.81.310.2hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Huawei Nova audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.25 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.6% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 50% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 15%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 72% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 48%

Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 33% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 15%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 46% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 48% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 48%

Huawei Nova Plus audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.39 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.5% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 15% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 15%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 47% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 48%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.01 / 0.09 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.61 / 1.83 / 1.86 Watt
Load midlight 3.71 / 5.19 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Huawei Nova
3020 mAh
Lenovo Moto Z Play
3510 mAh
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
3000 mAh
ZTE Axon 7
3250 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
2900 mAh
Huawei Nova Plus
3340 mAh
Power Consumption
39%
-12%
-12%
-3%
12%
Idle Minimum *
0.61
0.51
16%
0.83
-36%
0.64
-5%
0.96
-57%
0.49
20%
Idle Average *
1.83
0.87
52%
2.11
-15%
0.84
54%
1.64
10%
1.63
11%
Idle Maximum *
1.86
0.9
52%
2.12
-14%
0.87
53%
1.71
8%
1.76
5%
Load Average *
3.71
1.69
54%
3.41
8%
6.02
-62%
2.98
20%
2.98
20%
Load Maximum *
5.19
4
23%
5.46
-5%
10.45
-101%
5.08
2%
4.99
4%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
31h 10min
WiFi Surfing v1.3
14h 33min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
11h 57min
Load (maximum brightness)
5h 28min
Huawei Nova
3020 mAh
Lenovo Moto Z Play
3510 mAh
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
3000 mAh
ZTE Axon 7
3250 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
2900 mAh
Huawei Nova Plus
3340 mAh
Battery Runtime
49%
1%
-22%
9%
5%
Reader / Idle
1870
2540
36%
1502
-20%
1735
-7%
2323
24%
2048
10%
Load
328
652
99%
352
7%
245
-25%
483
47%
366
12%
WiFi
WiFi v1.3
873
824
-6%
797
-9%
411
-53%
626
-28%
820
-6%
H.264
717
1190
66%
905
26%
704
-2%
672
-6%
732
2%

Pro

+ 高亮度全高清屏幕
+ 出色制造工艺
+ USB Type-C 接口
+ 指纹识别传感器
+ 出色的相机
+ 长续航时间

Cons

- 无光学图像稳定器
- 只有2.4 GHz Wi-Fi
- 只有混合双卡槽
- 无 App2SD
In review: Huawei Nova. Review sample courtesy of Huawei Germany.
In review: Huawei Nova. Review sample courtesy of Huawei Germany.

就像华为的Nova Plus手机一样,华为的Nova手机是一台几乎没有瑕疵的好手机。它的亮点包括一块明亮的全高清屏幕,高质量的坚硬外壳,USB Type-C接口,双SIM卡支持以及一个可靠的指纹传感器。尽管它的1200万像素主摄像头相比Nova Plus来说分辨率略低,也缺少光学防抖组件,但是它却能拍摄质量很好的视频以及照片,甚至可以做到其他中端手机很少办到的事情---拍摄UHD视频。尽管它的电池容量相对较小,但是华为的Nova手机在续航方面却是让人信服的。比起Nova Plus,我们更喜欢喜欢Nova上这个支持更多UMTS频段以及更小的比吸收率(SAR)的无线电通讯模块。

华为带来了一台整体上值得推荐的5英寸设备,Nova。它与贵了80欧元(85美元)的Nova Plus相比,除了更小的屏幕外,几乎没有区别。

我们几乎可以完全将华为Nova Plus的缺点列表放在这里用 。它只有一个让SIM卡和Micro-SD卡不得不共享的混合卡槽而没有两个独立的卡槽。因为缺少对于5GHz网络的支持,它的Wi-Fi性能表现实在很难评价。再者,应用无法被安装到SD卡中。对于那些可以接受这些缺点而想省下80欧元,相比起Nova Plus,的买家来说,华为Nova是一台值得推荐的手机。根据厂商的说法,它很快会像它的5.5寸型号一样获得Android 7的更新。

注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里

Huawei Nova - 01/09/2017 v6
Manuel Masiero

Chassis
86%
Keyboard
68 / 75 → 91%
Pointing Device
96%
Connectivity
40 / 60 → 66%
Weight
93%
Battery
95%
Display
87%
Games Performance
33 / 63 → 52%
Application Performance
50 / 70 → 72%
Temperature
87%
Noise
100%
Audio
60 / 91 → 66%
Camera
73%
Average
74%
86%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 华为 Nova 智能手机简短评测
Manuel Masiero, 2017-01-28 (Update: 2017-01-28)