Notebookcheck

华为nova 9智能手机评论。没有5G,但有一些特殊的相机功能

来自Honor 的问候。 通过nova 9,华为再次试图用一些设计巧妙的技术,特别是相机软件来打动人。同时,它缺乏谷歌服务以及对5G移动通信标准的支持。我们的评论发现,Android 智能手机能做什么。
Mike Wobker, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Android Smartphone Touchscreen
华为nova 9

那些看过我们的测试的人 Honor 50尽管两家公司分开了,但华为提供了一个几乎相同的智能手机。然而,它只是没有5G和谷歌服务,因为这些仍然受到针对中国供应商的贸易限制的影响。

大约500欧元(约566美元),华为智能手机配备了一个 高通骁龙778G4G,一个高通Adreno-642L图形单元,8GB内存,和128GB内部存储。配备了这些硬件,它必须与下面列出的对比设备竞争。

, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 
Huawei Nova 9 (Nova Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G 8 x 1.8 - 2.4 GHz, Kryo 670 (Cortex-A78/A55)
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 642L
Memory
8192 MB 
Display
6.57 inch 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixel 392 PPI, capacitive, OLED, glossy: yes, 120 Hz
Storage
128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 118 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: USB Type-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: gravity sensor, gyroscope, e-compass, proximity sensor
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.2, 2G GSM (850/900/1800/1900 MHz), 3G WCDMA (1/2/4/5/6/8/19), 4G LTE TDD/FDD (1/2/3/4/5/7/8/12/17/18/19/20/26/28/34/38/39/40/41/66), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7.77 x 160 x 73.7
Battery
4300 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 11
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (f/1.9) + 8 MP (ultra-wide, f/2.2) + 2 MP (depth, f/2.4) + 2 MP (macro, f/2.4)
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix (f/2.0)
Additional features
Speakers: dual, Keyboard: onscreen, Keyboard Light: yes, charger, Usb-C cable, SIM tool, silicone case, EMUI 12, 24 Months Warranty, SAR value (head): 0.8 W/kg, SAR value (body): 1.2 W/kg, GPS (L1 + L5 dual band), AGPS, GLONASS, BeiDou (B1I + B1C + B2a Tri-band), GALILEO (E1 + E5a dual band), QZSS (L1 + L5 dual band), NavIC, fanless
Weight
175 g, Power Supply: 135 g
Price
499 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible Competitors for Comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
85.1 %
12/2021
Huawei Nova 9
SD 778G 5G, Adreno 642
175 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.57"2340x1080
85.2 %
12/2021
Honor 50
SD 778G 5G, Adreno 642
175 g256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.57"2340x1080
84 %
11/2021
Motorola Edge 20
SD 778G 5G, Adreno 642
163 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.70"2400x1080
84.9 %
10/2021
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
SD 778G 5G, Adreno 642
189 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.50"2400x1080
86.4 %
10/2021
Xiaomi 11T
Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9
203 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.67"2400x1080

华为nova 9的外壳采用了金属框架和玻璃背面。后者以相机系统为主,设计了一个形成双圆的框架,这也可以在手机中找到。 Honor 50.做工显示出很高的质量,所有的按键都紧紧地坐在框架里。制造商放弃了IP认证。与其他同级别的智能手机相比,nova 9相对较轻,只有175克(约6.2盎司),并且由于其小框架而非常紧凑。

华为nova 9
华为nova 9
华为nova 9
华为nova 9
华为nova 9
华为nova 9
华为nova 9

Size Comparison

164.1 mm 76.9 mm 8.8 mm 203 g163 mm 76 mm 7 mm 163 g159.9 mm 75.1 mm 8.4 mm 189 g160 mm 73.7 mm 7.77 mm 175 g159.96 mm 73.76 mm 7.78 mm 175 g

设备 - nova 9不提供音频端口

除了已经提到的硬件外,华为nova 9提供了两个NanoSIM卡的空间,分别支持VoLTE和VoWLAN。没有microSD卡插槽,也缺少一个3.5毫米的音频端口。然而,外部耳机可以通过USB-C 2.0连接到智能手机上。不支持DRM Widevine L1,Camera2 API在 "完整 "级别可用。

左侧:无连接
左侧:无连接
顶部: 麦克风
顶部: 麦克风
右侧:音量摇杆、电源键
右侧:音量摇杆、电源键
底部。NanoSIM卡插槽、麦克风、USB-C、扬声器
底部。NanoSIM卡插槽、麦克风、USB-C、扬声器

软件--华为手机中没有谷歌服务

nova 9包含EMUI 12.0.1版本,它基于Android 11,在视觉上看起来与HarmonyOS相同,安全补丁的级别为2021年11月1日。由于华为不得不在没有谷歌服务的情况下,提供了一些有用的替代品,如华为AppGallery、Petal Maps和其他应用程序。该智能手机的主屏幕还显示了众多第三方应用程序的下载链接,如Check24、Stepstone、Snapchat等。

系统操作与其他Android 系统几乎相同,你只需要投入一些时间来适应这些替代应用程序。

软件 华为nova 9
软件 华为nova 9
软件 华为nova 9
软件 华为nova 9
软件 华为nova 9
软件 华为nova 9

通信和GNSS--华为nova9中没有5G

nova 9能够通过GSM、3G和LTE建立移动连接。通过LTE Cat.11/12,下载速率可达 600 Mbit/s,上传速率可达 100 Mbit/s。

对于近距离通信,华为智能手机可以使用NFC、蓝牙5.2和WiFi 6。结合我们的参考路由器,我们测量了传输时的平均速度为692 Mbit/s,接收数据时的平均速度为727 Mbit/s,使nova 9在我们的测试领域处于倒数第二。

Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12
Xiaomi 11T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
884 (817min - 939max) MBit/s ∼100% +28%
Honor 50
Adreno 642, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
852 (384min - 906max) MBit/s ∼96% +23%
Motorola Edge 20
Adreno 642, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
697 (664min - 716max) MBit/s ∼79% +1%
Huawei Nova 9
Adreno 642, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
692 (347min - 713max) MBit/s ∼78%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.59 - 1599, n=285, last 2 years)
476 MBit/s ∼54% -31%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Adreno 642, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
461 (433min - 470max) MBit/s ∼52% -33%
iperf3 Client (receive) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12
Xiaomi 11T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
836 (737min - 887max) MBit/s ∼100% +15%
Motorola Edge 20
Adreno 642, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
809 (717min - 844max) MBit/s ∼97% +11%
Honor 50
Adreno 642, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
769 (725min - 813max) MBit/s ∼92% +6%
Huawei Nova 9
Adreno 642, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
727 (616min - 781max) MBit/s ∼87%
Average of class Smartphone
  (15.5 - 1414, n=285, last 2 years)
468 MBit/s ∼56% -36%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Adreno 642, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
425 (413min - 432max) MBit/s ∼51% -42%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900Tooltip
Huawei Nova 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 642L; iperf3 Client (receive) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø727 (616-781)
Honor 50 Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 642L; iperf3 Client (receive) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø768 (725-813)
Huawei Nova 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 642L; iperf3 Client (transmit) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø680 (347-713)
Honor 50 Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 642L; iperf3 Client (transmit) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø852 (384-906)
在室内进行GPS测试
在室内进行GPS测试
室外的GPS测试
室外的GPS测试

华为nova 9能够使用GPS、GLONASS、北斗、伽利略和QZSS确定其位置。有了它,我们用 "GPS测试 "应用程序测得的定位精度在室外可达4米(约13英尺)。

在我们的强制性自行车旅行中,与我们的Garmin Edge 500参考设备相比,nova 9记录了一些略微有些扫兴的曲线线。

全球导航卫星系统--围绕湖泊
全球导航卫星系统--围绕湖泊
GNSS--转折点
GNSS--转折点
GNSS - 概述
GNSS - 概述

电话功能和语音质量 - 与华为的良好连接

在打电话的时候,nova 9能产生很高的音量,并提供良好的噪音抑制。谈话双方都很容易理解,他们的声音也能清晰地传递。

电话应用程序提供快速访问最近的电话和数字键盘,你也可以从这里访问收藏夹和存储的联系人。

摄像机 - 广泛的Vlog功能

用前置摄像头拍摄的照片
用前置摄像头拍摄的照片
博客功能
博客功能

华为nova 9的前置摄像头能够记录自拍,分辨率为32MP。细节刻画得很好,颜色再现得相对自然。然而,专业模式仅适用于主摄像头。

nova 9背面的5千万像素传感器确保近距离拍摄有非常丰富的细节。颜色显得非常鲜艳,我们的测试对象被清晰地再现出来,并具有丰富的细节。我们的全景照片也显示出鲜艳的色彩,但在阴天时物体显得略微模糊。用800万像素的超广角镜头拍摄的照片也显示了前面提到的明亮的色彩,但物体的边缘和细节在这里也显得不是很有层次感。

用数码变焦放大的物体显示出同样的模糊性,在全景拍摄中也可以看到这种模糊性。在恶劣的光线条件下,nova 9能够清晰地记录图像中心的细节。除了已经提到的传感器外,华为智能手机还包括一个用于深度信息的200万像素传感器和一个用于微距拍摄的200万像素传感器。相机软件的专业模式允许你手动调整焦点区域、ISO值、曝光、照明和白平衡。

视频记录显示出与我们的测试照片相同的质量。你可以选择30帧/秒的4K分辨率或30或60帧/秒的1080p和720p分辨率。一个特殊的VLOG模式允许你创建在前后摄像头之间无缝转换的记录。画中画和同时显示前后摄像头的对象也是可以无缝实现的。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

NahaufnahmePanoramabildUltraweitwinkelZoom (5-Fach)LowLight
click to load images

ColorChecker Passport的图像显示,nova 9记录的颜色比应该的颜色略为明亮。测试图显示了许多细节和鲜艳的色彩。在下角,我们看到对比度有轻微的弱点。

ColorChecker
9.4 ∆E
7 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
12.6 ∆E
6 ∆E
4 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
13.1 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
3 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
8 ∆E
ColorChecker Huawei Nova 9: 6.93 ∆E min: 2.95 - max: 13.15 ∆E
ColorChecker
22.7 ∆E
34.8 ∆E
29.8 ∆E
24.7 ∆E
33.2 ∆E
42.5 ∆E
31.3 ∆E
26 ∆E
22.3 ∆E
22.3 ∆E
31.4 ∆E
38.4 ∆E
25.2 ∆E
27.6 ∆E
14.8 ∆E
23.2 ∆E
27.1 ∆E
32.4 ∆E
27.5 ∆E
29.3 ∆E
32.4 ∆E
29 ∆E
22.3 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Huawei Nova 9: 27.64 ∆E min: 13.42 - max: 42.47 ∆E

配件和保修 - 包括保护罩

除了带有相应USB-C电缆的快速充电器外,nova 9的包装盒还包括一个SIM卡工具和一个硅胶制成的保护罩。你还可以直接从制造商那里购买其他配件。

华为为nova 9提供24个月的保修。

输入设备和操作 - SwiftKey作为GBoard的替代品

nova 9使用SwiftKey作为文本输入的标准键盘。这可以单独调整,适合长篇文字输入。触摸屏对触摸输入的反应非常直接,也适合频繁的刷屏动作。

要解锁智能手机,你可以使用屏幕内的指纹传感器,它的反应很可靠,或者使用人脸识别,这也适合日常使用。

华为nova 9 - 输入设备
华为nova 9 - 输入设备
华为nova 9 - 输入设备
华为nova 9 - 输入设备

显示屏 - 一个120赫兹的OLED面板

子像素网格
子像素网格

nova 9的显示屏由一个6.57英寸的OLED面板组成,提供2340 x 1080像素的分辨率。在激活亮度传感器的情况下,我们测量的平均亮度高达632cd/m²,而在没有亮度传感器的情况下,最高值为449cd/m²。在APL50测试中,华为智能手机实现了非常好的834 cd/m²,你可以调整到的最低亮度为1.59 cd/m²。在96%时,亮度分布达到了我们测试领域的水平。

在42%的亮度水平以下,亮度控制使用频率在163.4和500 Hz之间的PWM。在此之上,我们测量的是120赫兹的恒定水平。虽然你可以在设置菜单中激活减少闪烁的功能,但这没有显示出可测量的效果。

625
cd/m²
627
cd/m²
644
cd/m²
625
cd/m²
621
cd/m²
646
cd/m²
624
cd/m²
629
cd/m²
648
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 648 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 632.1 cd/m² Minimum: 1.59 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 96 %
Center on Battery: 621 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.7 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.4
ΔE Greyscale 2.2 | 0.64-98 Ø5.7
100% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.17
Huawei Nova 9
OLED, 2340x1080, 6.57
Honor 50
OLED, 2340x1080, 6.57
Motorola Edge 20
OLED, 2400x1080, 6.70
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.50
Xiaomi 11T
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.67
Screen
-41%
-32%
-15%
4%
Brightness middle
621
731
18%
479
-23%
736
19%
781
26%
Brightness
632
722
14%
480
-24%
751
19%
782
24%
Brightness Distribution
96
97
1%
94
-2%
96
0%
94
-2%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.7
3.1
-82%
2.06
-21%
2.18
-28%
2
-18%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
2.8
5.8
-107%
4.54
-62%
5.69
-103%
2.9
-4%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.2
4.2
-91%
3.5
-59%
2.1
5%
2.3
-5%
Gamma
2.17 101%
2.19 100%
2.205 100%
2.27 97%
2.28 96%
CCT
6806 96%
6818 95%
6794 96%
6563 99%
6852 95%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 500 Hz ≤ 100 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 500 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 500 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 20851 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

作为OLED显示器的典型代表,nova 9显示器提供了出色的对比度和非常好的黑值。在 "正常 "色彩模式预设和 "标准 "色温下,色彩的再现非常平衡。另外,"鲜艳"、"温暖 "和 "寒冷 "的色彩模式也可供选择。此外,一个可自由调节的色标允许你手动调整显示。

CalMAN - 色彩准确度(标准、正常、sRGB)
CalMAN - 色彩准确度(标准、正常、sRGB)
CalMAN - 色彩空间(标准、正常、sRGB)。
CalMAN - 色彩空间(标准、正常、sRGB)。
CalMAN - 灰度(标准、正常、sRGB)。
CalMAN - 灰度(标准、正常、sRGB)。
CalMAN - 饱和度(标准、正常、sRGB)。
CalMAN - 饱和度(标准、正常、sRGB)。

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
2.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.6 ms rise
↘ 1.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (23.7 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
2.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.6 ms rise
↘ 1.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (37.5 ms).

在户外,华为nova 9也可以在非常明亮的光线环境下轻松使用。内容很容易阅读,而且只有很少的反射。

华为nova9户外使用
华为nova9户外使用
华为nova9户外使用
华为nova9户外使用

nova 9的OLED面板提供了非常稳定的可视角度,只有在非常陡峭的可视角度下才会出现轻微的绿色色调。

华为nova 9 - 视角稳定
华为nova 9 - 视角稳定
华为nova 9 - 视角稳定
华为nova 9 - 视角稳定

表现 - 良好的日常表现

华为使用的是 高通骁龙778G4G和8GB内存,以确保nova 9的系统运行顺畅。在基准测试中,Android 智能手机提供了一个平均良好的结果,只是在图形重度测试中比我们测试领域的其他智能手机稍差。其性能与5G版本的骁龙778相同。

在日常操作中,即使是要求较高的应用程序也能快速启动,而且系统总是可以顺利运行。由于缺乏Play Store支持,我们无法运行一些标准测试,如Geekbench 5.4或当前版本的3D和PCMark。

Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
3500 Points ∼82%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
4294 Points ∼100% +23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (3452 - 3500, n=2)
3476 Points ∼81% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (412 - 6287, n=65, last 2 years)
2967 Points ∼69% -15%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
11003 Points ∼81%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
13528 Points ∼100% +23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (10974 - 11003, n=2)
10989 Points ∼81% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1163 - 15231, n=65, last 2 years)
8791 Points ∼65% -20%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
5597 Points ∼59%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
9547 Points ∼100% +71%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (5597 - 8765, n=2)
7181 Points ∼75% +28%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2810 - 11557, n=54, last 2 years)
7394 Points ∼77% +32%
PCMark for Android - Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
8501 Points ∼73%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
11645 Points ∼100% +37%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
8845 Points ∼76% +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (8501 - 11645, n=2)
10073 Points ∼87% +18%
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 15299, n=213, last 2 years)
8275 Points ∼71% -3%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
6358 Points ∼100%
Honor 50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
6340 Points ∼99% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
6352 Points ∼100% 0%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (6340 - 6409, n=6)
6373 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 11256, n=226, last 2 years)
3586 Points ∼56% -44%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
7276 Points ∼100%
Honor 50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
7224 Points ∼99% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
7241 Points ∼100% 0%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (7189 - 7276, n=6)
7235 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (54 - 16670, n=226, last 2 years)
4178 Points ∼57% -43%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
4410 Points ∼98%
Honor 50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
4439 Points ∼99% +1%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
4442 Points ∼99% +1%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (4410 - 4605, n=6)
4493 Points ∼100% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (677 - 5301, n=226, last 2 years)
2893 Points ∼64% -34%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
6639 Points ∼83%
Honor 50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
6638 Points ∼83% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
6559 Points ∼82% -1%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
8041 Points ∼100% +21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (6398 - 6703, n=6)
6566 Points ∼82% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (149 - 11895, n=256, last 2 years)
4500 Points ∼56% -32%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
7618 Points ∼65%
Honor 50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
7536 Points ∼64% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
7496 Points ∼64% -2%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
11770 Points ∼100% +55%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (7199 - 7618, n=6)
7488 Points ∼64% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (122 - 31940, n=256, last 2 years)
5864 Points ∼50% -23%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
4580 Points ∼94%
Honor 50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
4684 Points ∼96% +2%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
4563 Points ∼93% 0%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
3813 Points ∼78% -17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (4224 - 6394, n=6)
4895 Points ∼100% +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (651 - 6394, n=254, last 2 years)
3144 Points ∼64% -31%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
5018 Points ∼100%
Honor 50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
5027 Points ∼100% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
4967 Points ∼99% -1%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (4967 - 5065, n=6)
5029 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (78 - 9138, n=223, last 2 years)
2772 Points ∼55% -45%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
5218 Points ∼100%
Honor 50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
5178 Points ∼99% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
5140 Points ∼99% -1%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (5140 - 5218, n=6)
5192 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (62 - 11573, n=223, last 2 years)
2932 Points ∼56% -44%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
4423 Points ∼97%
Honor 50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
4561 Points ∼100% +3%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
4444 Points ∼97% 0%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (4423 - 4592, n=6)
4509 Points ∼99% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (688 - 5318, n=223, last 2 years)
2917 Points ∼64% -34%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
5435 Points ∼75%
Honor 50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
5375 Points ∼74% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
5355 Points ∼74% -1%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
7256 Points ∼100% +34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (5032 - 5469, n=6)
5317 Points ∼73% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (91 - 9839, n=258, last 2 years)
3708 Points ∼51% -32%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
5637 Points ∼67%
Honor 50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
5614 Points ∼67% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
5591 Points ∼67% -1%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
8353 Points ∼100% +48%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (5103 - 5651, n=6)
5540 Points ∼66% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (73 - 16221, n=258, last 2 years)
4363 Points ∼52% -23%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
4831 Points ∼97%
Honor 50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
4677 Points ∼94% -3%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
4664 Points ∼94% -3%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
4971 Points ∼100% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (4166 - 4942, n=6)
4634 Points ∼93% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (635 - 5793, n=258, last 2 years)
3172 Points ∼64% -34%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
4810 Points ∼100%
Honor 50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
4300 Points ∼89% -11%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
4250 Points ∼88% -12%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (4002 - 4810, n=6)
4320 Points ∼90% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (426 - 6977, n=196, last 2 years)
2663 Points ∼55% -45%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
5370 Points ∼100%
Honor 50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
5302 Points ∼99% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
5263 Points ∼98% -2%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (5263 - 5370, n=6)
5321 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (349 - 11259, n=196, last 2 years)
2997 Points ∼56% -44%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
3523 Points ∼100%
Honor 50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
2588 Points ∼73% -27%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
2539 Points ∼72% -28%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (2137 - 3523, n=6)
2654 Points ∼75% -25%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1786 - 4061, n=196, last 2 years)
2650 Points ∼75% -25%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
60 fps ∼52%
Honor 50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
99 fps ∼85% +65%
Motorola Edge 20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
116 fps ∼100% +93%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
108 fps ∼93% +80%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
116 fps ∼100% +93%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (60 - 116, n=7)
91.3 fps ∼79% +52%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8.2 - 143, n=210, last 2 years)
64.6 fps ∼56% +8%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
133 fps ∼72%
Honor 50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
133 fps ∼72% 0%
Motorola Edge 20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
133 fps ∼72% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
132 fps ∼71% -1%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
185 fps ∼100% +39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (132 - 134, n=7)
133 fps ∼72% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.3 - 425, n=210, last 2 years)
122 fps ∼66% -8%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
59 fps ∼56%
Honor 50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
68 fps ∼64% +15%
Motorola Edge 20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
69 fps ∼65% +17%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
69 fps ∼65% +17%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
106 fps ∼100% +80%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (59 - 69, n=7)
65.9 fps ∼62% +12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.5 - 121, n=209, last 2 years)
51.9 fps ∼49% -12%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
79 fps ∼65%
Honor 50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
77 fps ∼63% -3%
Motorola Edge 20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
78 fps ∼64% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
77 fps ∼63% -3%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
122 fps ∼100% +54%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (77 - 79, n=7)
78 fps ∼64% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 251, n=210, last 2 years)
71 fps ∼58% -10%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
53 fps ∼71%
Honor 50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
48 fps ∼64% -9%
Motorola Edge 20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
49 fps ∼65% -8%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
49 fps ∼65% -8%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
75 fps ∼100% +42%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (48 - 53, n=7)
49.9 fps ∼67% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.1 - 106, n=208, last 2 years)
40.3 fps ∼54% -24%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
57 fps ∼72%
Honor 50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
56 fps ∼71% -2%
Motorola Edge 20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
56 fps ∼71% -2%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
56 fps ∼71% -2%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
79 fps ∼100% +39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (56 - 57, n=7)
56.4 fps ∼71% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 169, n=208, last 2 years)
48.9 fps ∼62% -14%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
31 fps ∼70%
Honor 50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
28 fps ∼64% -10%
Motorola Edge 20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
29 fps ∼66% -6%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
28 fps ∼64% -10%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
44 fps ∼100% +42%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (28 - 31, n=7)
28.9 fps ∼66% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.3 - 61, n=207, last 2 years)
25.1 fps ∼57% -19%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
33 fps ∼72%
Honor 50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
33 fps ∼72% 0%
Motorola Edge 20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
33 fps ∼72% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
33 fps ∼72% 0%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
46 fps ∼100% +39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (33 - 33, n=7)
33 fps ∼72% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.8 - 96.6, n=207, last 2 years)
29.3 fps ∼64% -11%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
35 fps ∼71%
Honor 50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
32 fps ∼65% -9%
Motorola Edge 20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
30 fps ∼61% -14%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
30 fps ∼61% -14%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
49 fps ∼100% +40%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (30 - 35, n=7)
31.6 fps ∼64% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.5 - 73, n=268, last 2 years)
25.8 fps ∼53% -26%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
38 fps ∼72%
Honor 50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
38 fps ∼72% 0%
Motorola Edge 20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
34 fps ∼64% -11%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
34 fps ∼64% -11%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
53 fps ∼100% +39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (34 - 39, n=7)
36 fps ∼68% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.9 - 257, n=268, last 2 years)
30.4 fps ∼57% -20%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
22 fps ∼67%
Honor 50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
20 fps ∼61% -9%
Motorola Edge 20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
19 fps ∼58% -14%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
19 fps ∼58% -14%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
33 fps ∼100% +50%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (19 - 22, n=7)
19.9 fps ∼60% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.1 - 60, n=269, last 2 years)
17.3 fps ∼52% -21%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
14 fps ∼67%
Honor 50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
14 fps ∼67% 0%
Motorola Edge 20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
13 fps ∼62% -7%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
13 fps ∼62% -7%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
21 fps ∼100% +50%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (13 - 14, n=7)
13.4 fps ∼64% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.7 - 101, n=269, last 2 years)
11.7 fps ∼56% -16%
Antutu v9 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
467593 Points ∼82%
Honor 50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
519177 Points ∼91% +11%
Motorola Edge 20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
520706 Points ∼91% +11%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
438254 Points ∼77% -6%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
570375 Points ∼100% +22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (438254 - 520706, n=7)
495281 Points ∼87% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (117053 - 962824, n=72, last 2 years)
506400 Points ∼89% +8%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
437387 Points ∼81%
Motorola Edge 20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
433068 Points ∼80% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
422597 Points ∼78% -3%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
540464 Points ∼100% +24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (422597 - 452805, n=5)
436226 Points ∼81% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53335 - 727247, n=178, last 2 years)
356772 Points ∼66% -18%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
4950 Points ∼93%
Honor 50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
5002 Points ∼94% +1%
Motorola Edge 20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
4615 Points ∼87% -7%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
4349 Points ∼82% -12%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
5319 Points ∼100% +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (4321 - 5002, n=7)
4688 Points ∼88% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (615 - 8124, n=193, last 2 years)
3937 Points ∼74% -20%
System (sort by value)
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
10816 Points ∼100%
Honor 50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
9880 Points ∼91% -9%
Motorola Edge 20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
8751 Points ∼81% -19%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
9089 Points ∼84% -16%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
9292 Points ∼86% -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (8751 - 10816, n=7)
9755 Points ∼90% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1160 - 19657, n=193, last 2 years)
7133 Points ∼66% -34%
Memory (sort by value)
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
6372 Points ∼89%
Honor 50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
6307 Points ∼88% -1%
Motorola Edge 20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
5234 Points ∼73% -18%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
4269 Points ∼60% -33%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
7144 Points ∼100% +12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (3956 - 6372, n=7)
5217 Points ∼73% -18%
Average of class Smartphone
  (522 - 9044, n=193, last 2 years)
4621 Points ∼65% -27%
Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
6726 Points ∼89%
Honor 50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
6659 Points ∼89% -1%
Motorola Edge 20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
6763 Points ∼90% +1%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
6783 Points ∼90% +1%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
7516 Points ∼100% +12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (6654 - 6783, n=7)
6714 Points ∼89% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (349 - 25642, n=193, last 2 years)
6279 Points ∼84% -7%
Web (sort by value)
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
1295 Points ∼81%
Honor 50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
1509 Points ∼94% +17%
Motorola Edge 20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
1465 Points ∼91% +13%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
1359 Points ∼85% +5%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
1604 Points ∼100% +24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (1295 - 1534, n=7)
1419 Points ∼88% +10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10 - 2392, n=193, last 2 years)
1333 Points ∼83% +3%

在浏览器基准测试中,华为nova 9只排在我们测试领域的低端。然而,在日常操作中,网站的渲染速度仍然很快,媒体内容的加载也很快。此外,流畅的滚动也是可能的,没有任何问题。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Motorola Edge 20 (Chrome 95)
86.797 Points ∼100% +48%
Honor 50 (Chrome 96)
76.107 Points ∼88% +29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G (58.8 - 86.8, n=7)
74.6 Points ∼86% +27%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G (Chrome 93)
71.757 Points ∼83% +22%
Huawei Nova 9 (Huawei Browser 12.0.0.303)
58.793 Points ∼68%
Average of class Smartphone (12.4 - 182, n=187, last 2 years)
55.2 Points ∼64% -6%
Xiaomi 11T (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
51.758 Points ∼60% -12%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Motorola Edge 20 (Chrome 95)
148.8 Points ∼100% +45%
Honor 50 (Chrome 96)
147.5 Points ∼99% +44%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G (103 - 155, n=7)
132 Points ∼89% +29%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G (Chrome 93)
118.13 Points ∼79% +15%
Xiaomi 11T (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
117.59 Points ∼79% +15%
Huawei Nova 9 (Huawei Browser 12.0.0.303)
102.59 Points ∼69%
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 414, n=195, last 2 years)
101 Points ∼68% -2%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Motorola Edge 20 (Chrome 95)
131 Points ∼100% +36%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G (Chrome 93)
107 Points ∼82% +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G (93 - 131, n=7)
106 Points ∼81% +10%
Honor 50 (Chrome 96)
102 Points ∼78% +6%
Huawei Nova 9 (Huawei Browser 12.0.0.303)
96 Points ∼73%
Average of class Smartphone (20 - 252, n=199, last 2 years)
83.5 Points ∼64% -13%
Xiaomi 11T (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
70 Points ∼53% -27%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Motorola Edge 20 (Chrome 95)
31783 Points ∼100% +33%
Honor 50 (Chrome 96)
31134 Points ∼98% +30%
Xiaomi 11T (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
29912 Points ∼94% +25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G (23915 - 31915, n=7)
28217 Points ∼89% +18%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G (Chrome 93)
25119 Points ∼79% +5%
Huawei Nova 9 (Huawei Browser 12.0.0.303)
23915 Points ∼75%
Average of class Smartphone (1986 - 64222, n=205, last 2 years)
19803 Points ∼62% -17%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (414 - 29635, n=207, last 2 years)
3588 ms * ∼100% -90%
Huawei Nova 9 (Huawei Browser 12.0.0.303)
1892.7 ms * ∼53%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G (Chrome 93)
1802.2 ms * ∼50% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G (1323 - 1893, n=7)
1569 ms * ∼44% +17%
Xiaomi 11T (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
1444.3 ms * ∼40% +24%
Honor 50 (Chrome 96)
1426.7 ms * ∼40% +25%
Motorola Edge 20 (Chrome 95)
1344.1 ms * ∼37% +29%

* ... smaller is better

nova 9的128GB存储空间在我们的测试中显示了竞争对手水平的快速访问率。它不可能通过microSD卡扩展存储。

Huawei Nova 9Honor 50Motorola Edge 20Samsung Galaxy A52s 5GXiaomi 11TAverage 128 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
0%
-17%
-23%
4%
11%
-36%
Sequential Read 256KB
1030.02
984.07
-4%
1010.9
-2%
951
-8%
1789.59
74%
1560 ?(1030 - 1790, n=27)
51%
846 ?(45.6 - 2037, n=270, last 2 years)
-18%
Sequential Write 256KB
758.84
609
-20%
471.4
-38%
486.5
-36%
942.08
24%
733 ?(233 - 1095, n=27)
-3%
390 ?(11.9 - 1465, n=270, last 2 years)
-49%
Random Read 4KB
229.56
245.71
7%
190.2
-17%
168.2
-27%
139.3
-39%
231 ?(126 - 317, n=27)
1%
149 ?(13.5 - 325, n=270, last 2 years)
-35%
Random Write 4KB
239.23
280.18
17%
210.6
-12%
192.5
-20%
133.27
-44%
228 ?(121 - 306, n=27)
-5%
141 ?(5.5 - 449, n=270, last 2 years)
-41%

游戏--华为nova 9适合游戏

内部 高通Adreno 642L华为nova 9的图形单元能够在高图形设置下流畅地运行更加苛刻的游戏。我们测试的游戏没有出现任何微小的停顿或类似的情况,控制总是轻松而流畅地工作。

氩氦刀
氩氦刀
PUBG手机版
PUBG手机版

辐射 - 扬声器适用于声音

温度

在负载情况下,华为nova 9的表面升温到最高34.1℃(93.4°F)。在这种情况下,智能手机只是感觉到温暖,不会变得太热,比如说拿在手里。

Max. Load
 33.5 °C32.7 °C31.6 °C 
 34.1 °C30.9 °C31.3 °C 
 33.5 °C32.1 °C29.7 °C 
Maximum: 34.1 °C
Average: 32.2 °C
29.4 °C30.8 °C31.7 °C
28.2 °C29.9 °C31.9 °C
28.1 °C28.4 °C31.9 °C
Maximum: 31.9 °C
Average: 30 °C
Power Supply (max.)  27.4 °C | Room Temperature 21.5 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.2 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34.1 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22 to 52.9 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 31.9 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.4 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
热图-顶部
热图-顶部
热图-底部
热图-底部

演讲者

nova 9能产生相对较大的音量和强调高频的声谱。这使它能够相对较好地再现语音内容,但对于更复杂的媒体内容,建议使用外部扬声器或耳机。这款华为智能手机有一个听筒和一个扬声器用于声音输出。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.832.2252431.73116.127.94027.633.75032.340.26323.436.1802236.81002235.71252137.716017.945.120013.348.925015.258.731513.258.940011.560.550012.26463012.369.180013.370.3100014.572.2125012.274.2160011.276.6200011.779250012.176.2315012.776.1400013.680.6500013.184.6630013.681.2800013.178.21000013.679.61250013.677.31600013.565.4SPL2590.5N0.681.2median 13.3median 72.2Delta1.29.6373825.628.229.12523.425.336.839.428.431.924.836.322.436.719.242.916.955.615.650.813.854.713.461.913.361.213.865.81268.512.774.612.276.11378.213.779.813.276.513.474.81376.213.377.213.674.613.379.813.878.113.774.61463.913.55825.588.60.777.4median 13.5median 74.60.79.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHuawei Nova 9Xiaomi 11T
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Huawei Nova 9 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.7% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 23%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 37% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Xiaomi 11T audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.1% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 23%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 23% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

电池寿命 - 它不像竞争对手那样持续时间长

消耗功率

我们的测量结果证明,nova 9的功耗与我们测试领域中的其他智能手机相似。它只是在我们的空闲--最大场景中略微多用了一点电量。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.04 / 0.29 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.96 / 2.47 / 2.55 Watt
Load midlight 3.85 / 7.43 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Huawei Nova 9
4300 mAh
Honor 50
4300 mAh
Motorola Edge 20
4000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
4500 mAh
Xiaomi 11T
5000 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Battery Runtime
WiFi v1.3
652
907
39%
716
10%
721
11%
813
25%
744 ?(652 - 907, n=7)
14%
909 ?(442 - 1953, n=277, last 2 years)
39%
Power Consumption
-8%
16%
13%
10%
9%
7%
Idle Minimum *
0.96
1.02
-6%
1
-4%
1.2
-25%
0.78
19%
0.977 ?(0.78 - 1.2, n=6)
-2%
0.936 ?(0.12 - 2.5, n=219, last 2 years)
2%
Idle Average *
2.47
2.98
-21%
1.3
47%
1.4
43%
1.86
25%
1.903 ?(1.3 - 2.98, n=6)
23%
1.775 ?(0.65 - 3.94, n=219, last 2 years)
28%
Idle Maximum *
2.55
3.11
-22%
1.6
37%
1.7
33%
1.88
26%
2.09 ?(1.6 - 3.11, n=6)
18%
2 ?(0.69 - 4.01, n=219, last 2 years)
22%
Load Average *
3.85
3.59
7%
3.9
-1%
3.6
6%
3.98
-3%
3.68 ?(3.23 - 3.9, n=6)
4%
4.47 ?(2.1 - 8.4, n=219, last 2 years)
-16%
Load Maximum *
7.43
7.12
4%
7.2
3%
6.9
7%
8.78
-18%
7.19 ?(6.9 - 7.43, n=6)
3%
7.37 ?(3.56 - 12.3, n=219, last 2 years)
1%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
16% / 0%
13% / 15%
12% / 13%
18% / 12%
12% / 10%
23% / 13%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

0123456789Tooltip
Huawei Nova 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G: Ø4.07 (1.209-9.03)
Xiaomi 11T MediaTek Dimensity 1200: Ø4.27 (1.04-9.35)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

012345678Tooltip
Xiaomi 11T MediaTek Dimensity 1200; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø6.92 (4.23-8.2)
Huawei Nova 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø3.05 (2.89-3.9)
Huawei Nova 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G; Idle 1min: Ø1.501 (1.401-1.923)
Xiaomi 11T MediaTek Dimensity 1200; Idle 1min: Ø1.202 (1.149-1.311)

电池寿命

在我们现实的WLAN测试中,华为nova 9实现了几乎11小时的运行时间。就凭这一点,它对其4300毫安时的电池的利用还不如类似装备的Honor 50,比如说。

使用附带的66瓦快速充电器,电池可以在大约1小时内完全充电。

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
10h 52min
Huawei Nova 9
4300 mAh
Honor 50
4300 mAh
Motorola Edge 20
4000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
4500 mAh
Xiaomi 11T
5000 mAh
Battery Runtime
WiFi v1.3
652
907
39%
716
10%
721
11%
813
25%

Pros

+ 相机软件包括广泛的视频功能
+ 良好的相机质量
+ 系统性能稳定

Cons

- 没有谷歌服务
- 只有4G
- 平庸的电池寿命

结论 - 没有谷歌,但有价格优势

测试华为nova 9。测试装置由德国华为提供。
测试华为nova 9。测试装置由德国华为提供。

通过nova 9,华为推出了一款在视觉上与Honor 50完全相同的智能手机。规格也是一样的,只是你不得不放弃5G和谷歌服务。虽然你几乎不必在性能方面做出任何妥协,但主要在电池寿命和软件方面存在一些不足。

华为nova 9同样装备精良,比Honor 50更实惠,但在电池寿命方面显示出一些弱点。

nova 9仍然是一款拥有良好技术的智能手机,它适合所有无论如何不想使用谷歌服务和5G的人。此外,该机的价格约为100欧元(约113美元),低于 Honor 50,同时仍然提供相同的相机设备。这也应该对购买决定产生影响。然而,那些可以接受较少内存的人已经可以用比nova 9更少的钱买到6GB内存的Honor 50。

另一方面,与 摩托罗拉Edge 20小米11T,竞争对手也有类似的、部分功能更强大的智能手机。

价格和可用性

例如,华为nova 9可从华为全球商店在不同国家或亚马逊售价约为515美元。

Huawei Nova 9 - 12/27/2021 v7
Mike Wobker

Chassis
86%
Keyboard
66 / 75 → 88%
Pointing Device
95%
Connectivity
52 / 70 → 74%
Weight
90%
Battery
89%
Display
89%
Games Performance
51 / 64 → 80%
Application Performance
77 / 86 → 90%
Temperature
93%
Noise
100%
Audio
79 / 90 → 87%
Camera
64%
Average
79%
85%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Mark Riege
Editor of the original article: Mark Riege - Translator - 282 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2018
Ninh Duy
Translator: Ninh Duy - Editorial Assistant - 216769 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008
contact me via: Facebook
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 华为nova 9智能手机评论。没有5G,但有一些特殊的相机功能
Mike Wobker, 2021-12-31 (Update: 2021-12-31)