Notebookcheck Logo

华为Nova 10 Pro评测--配备60MP自拍镜的高端智能手机

航班被取消。 华为新星10 Pro有许多特点,是一款优秀的上层智能手机的特征。一个吸引人的相机设置,大量的存储,快速的100瓦充电,以及120赫兹的OLED。然而,它也受到众所周知的限制,现在有更大的后果。
Android Smartphone Touchscreen
Huawei Nova 10 Pro (Nova Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 4G 8 x 1.8 - 2.4 GHz, Kryo 670 (Cortex-A78/A55)
Graphics adapter
Memory
8 GB 
, LPDDR5
Display
6.78 inch 19.9:9, 2652 x 1200 pixel 429 PPI, Capacitive, 300 Hz Touch-Sampling-Rate, OLED, glossy: yes, 120 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 256 GB 
, 236.45 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity, OTG
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.2, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (Band 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 19 ), LTE (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7.96 x 164.24 x 74.55
Battery
4500 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 11
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (f/1.8, 27 mm) + 8 MPix (Ultra Wide/Macro, 110°, f/2.2) + 2 MPix (Portrait, f/2.4); Camera2-API-Level: Full
Secondary Camera: 60 MPix (f/2.4, 100°, Dual-AF) + 8 MPix (2x opt. Zoom, AF, f/2.2)
Additional features
Speakers: Dual, Keyboard: Onscreen, 100W-Charger, USB-Cable (Type-A to Type-C), Clear-Cover, SIM-Tool, EMUI 12, 24 Months Warranty, Head-SAR: 0.95 W/kg, Body-SAR: 1.25 W/kg; GNSS: GPS (L1, L5), Glonass (L1), Galileo (E1, E5a), BeiDou (B1, B1C, B2a); DRM Widevine L1; HDR: HLG, HDR10, HDR10+, fanless
Weight
191 g
Price
730 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
86 %
12/2022
Huawei Nova 10 Pro
SD 778G 4G, Adreno 642L
191 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.78"2652x1200
89.3 %
05/2022
Samsung Galaxy S22
Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920
167 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.10"2340x1080
87 %
08/2022
OnePlus 10T
SD 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730
203.5 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.70"2412x1080
87.4 %
10/2022
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
SD 888+ 5G, Adreno 660
172 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.55"2400x1080

外壳和功能 - 设计别致的华为智能手机

尽管其重量相当高,但华为Nova 10 Pro在手中给人以纤细的印象。这是由于长边上的圆形显示屏边缘的缘故。虽然相机设置明显突出于外壳,看起来相当笨重,但该智能手机仍然很平衡。

哑光的背面对指纹不敏感,看起来很别致,但它并不像我们所期望的这个价格范围内的智能手机那样高质量。另一方面,建造质量真的很好。缝隙紧密而均匀。只有SIM卡槽的盖子在框架中略微凹陷,不能平齐关闭。在SIM卡槽上有一个橡胶密封,但Nova 10 Pro没有指定的IP认证。

总的来说,新星10 Pro在设备方面缺乏一些高级功能。除了缺乏IP认证,我们还希望看到无线充电,更现代的USB标准,或者至少有一个红外发射器。

尺寸比较

164.24 mm 74.55 mm 7.96 mm 191 g163 mm 75.4 mm 8.75 mm 203.5 g158.48 mm 71.99 mm 7.45 mm 172 g146 mm 70.6 mm 7.6 mm 167 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

通信、软件和操作 - Nova 10 Pro仍然使用Android 11

华为的Nova 10 Pro没有使用5G,但它支持LTE,频段覆盖面广。在大都市的环境中,接收性能很好,但是Nova的移动数据连接(下载:161 Mbit/s,上传:17.3 Mbit/s)要比 摩托罗拉Edge 30 Fusion(LTE,下载:212 MBit/s,上传:26.6 MBit/s)。在测试中,电话功能可以令人信服。用户的声音呈现得非常自然,较轻的干扰噪音被可靠地抑制。

与WLAN的连接在Wi-Fi 6网络中最多只能成功。华为智能手机用我们的参考路由器华硕ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000管理稳定的传输率。

新星10 Pro运行华为的EMUI 12(和谐操作系统2.0),这是基于Android 11。制造商克制自己在测试期间分发更新,因为安全补丁仍然是到2022年7月1日为止。目前还不清楚是否以及何时会有EMUI 13 (Android 12)的更新。与在此期间的所有华为手机一样,新星10 Pro必须没有谷歌服务。然而,有一个DRM认证。

集成在显示屏上的光学指纹扫描仪可用于生物识别安全。它能非常可靠地识别存储的肢体,而且工作速度相当快。二维面部识别也是可用的。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Huawei Nova 10 Pro
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
991 (499min - 1010max) MBit/s
OnePlus 10T
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
933 (865min - 958max) MBit/s -6%
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Wi-Fi 6E
844 (744min - 917max) MBit/s -15%
Samsung Galaxy S22
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
823 (418min - 852max) MBit/s -17%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
OnePlus 10T
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
934 (768min - 949max) MBit/s +21%
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Wi-Fi 6E
775 (699min - 873max) MBit/s +1%
Huawei Nova 10 Pro
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
770 (683min - 807max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy S22
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
763 (386min - 780max) MBit/s -1%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Wi-Fi 6E
1670 (610min - 1889max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Wi-Fi 6E
800 (597min - 1400max) MBit/s
095190285380475570665760855950104511401235133014251520161517101805Tooltip
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 660; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1669 (610-1889)
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 660; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø800 (597-1400)
Huawei Nova 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 4G, Qualcomm Adreno 642L; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø770 (683-807)
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 660; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø774 (699-873)
Huawei Nova 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 4G, Qualcomm Adreno 642L; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø975 (499-1010)
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 660; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø844 (744-917)

相机 - 新星10 Pro,60MP,用于自拍

与华为Nova 10 Pro的自拍
与华为Nova 10 Pro的自拍

华为Nova 10 Pro的一个亮点是双前置摄像头,不仅分辨率高,而且两个镜头都配备了自动对焦功能。自拍有自然的色彩再现,有许多过滤器,还有全面的美容模式。它们在细节方面也能令人信服。视频以超高清记录,最好能达到30FPS。

背面的三重摄像头使用50MP的RYYB传感器。它的特点是同质化的色彩再现和高细节水平。动态范围相当高,但细节受到影响。华为还增加了一个景深镜头和一个超广角镜头。后者也可以作为微距镜头使用。

同样,视频以超高清记录,最多只有30FPS。至少主摄像头可以每秒多记录几帧。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main cameraMain cameraUltra wide-angle5x ZoomLow-Light
click to load images
ColorChecker
5.9 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
11 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
4 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Huawei Nova 10 Pro: 6.97 ∆E min: 3.96 - max: 10.99 ∆E
ColorChecker
15.5 ∆E
14.9 ∆E
21.1 ∆E
19.3 ∆E
21.3 ∆E
22 ∆E
15.2 ∆E
16.8 ∆E
13 ∆E
14.7 ∆E
16.6 ∆E
18.3 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
18.7 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
16.1 ∆E
25.2 ∆E
12.3 ∆E
14.1 ∆E
18.2 ∆E
24 ∆E
18.8 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
ColorChecker Huawei Nova 10 Pro: 16.78 ∆E min: 9.67 - max: 25.22 ∆E

显示屏 - 华为Nova 10 Pro的明亮的120赫兹OLED显示屏

子像素结构
子像素结构

华为Nova 10 Pro的6.78英寸OLED屏幕使用了不寻常的分辨率,但在设置中启用时,它提供了高像素密度。刷新率可以达到120赫兹。这是由系统自动控制的,或者可以由用户设置为60或120赫兹。

在纯白显示和激活环境光传感器的情况下,该面板以高达811cd/m²的亮度闪耀。随着黑暗和明亮区域的均匀分布(APL18),它的最大峰值亮度达到869 cd/m²。那些喜欢手动调节亮度的人,有高达571 cd/m²的亮度供他们使用。

我们可以用示波器测量460和532赫兹之间的闪烁,低于可调亮度的44%。在这个标志以上,只有在120赫兹的帧率水平上才能检测到闪烁。

799
cd/m²
804
cd/m²
812
cd/m²
790
cd/m²
798
cd/m²
807
cd/m²
797
cd/m²
802
cd/m²
811
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 812 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 802.2 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 798 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.99
ΔE Greyscale 1.7 | 0.57-98 Ø5.2
99.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.25
Huawei Nova 10 Pro
OLED, 2652x1200, 6.78
Samsung Galaxy S22
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.10
OnePlus 10T
Fluid AMOLED, 2412x1080, 6.70
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
pOLED, 2400x1080, 6.55
Response Times
-255%
-23%
18%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
1.08 ?(0.56, 0.524)
8.486 ?(4.243, 4.243)
-686%
1.3 ?(0.7, 0.6)
-20%
1.19 ?(0.5605, 0.627)
-10%
Response Time Black / White *
1.02 ?(0.498, 0.518)
1.275 ?(0.644, 0.631)
-25%
1.2 ?(0.6, 0.6)
-18%
0.79 ?(0.4065, 0.3825)
23%
PWM Frequency
532
239.8
-55%
360.8
-32%
753
42%
Screen
-15%
-36%
1%
Brightness middle
798
853
7%
861
8%
954
20%
Brightness
802
858
7%
856
7%
961
20%
Brightness Distribution
97
96
-1%
97
0%
98
1%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.1
1.9
-73%
2.27
-106%
1.5
-36%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
2.7
3.2
-19%
4.17
-54%
2.5
7%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.7
1.9
-12%
2.9
-71%
1.8
-6%
Gamma
2.25 98%
2.07 106%
2.303 96%
2.24 98%
CCT
6374 102%
6460 101%
6141 106%
6254 104%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-135% / -95%
-30% / -32%
10% / 7%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
1.02 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.498 ms rise
↘ 0.518 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.4 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.08 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.56 ms rise
↘ 0.524 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.6 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 532 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 532 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 532 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17726 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

最小显示亮度
分钟。
25 %显示亮度
25 %
50 % 显示亮度
50 %
75 %显示亮度
75 %
最大手动显示亮度
100 %

具有固定变焦水平和不同亮度设置的测量系列

灰度(色彩模式:正常,色温:标准,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
灰度(色彩模式:正常,色温:标准,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
颜色(色彩模式:正常,色温:标准,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
颜色(色彩模式:正常,色温:标准,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩空间(色彩模式:正常,色温:标准,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩空间(色彩模式:正常,色温:标准,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
饱和度(色彩模式:正常,色温:标准,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
饱和度(色彩模式:正常,色温:标准,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
户外活动
户外活动
视角稳定
视角稳定

性能、排放和电池寿命--没有速度的狂热

华为Nova 10 Pro采用了一个 骁龙778G 4G芯片,该芯片在名义上与 778G 5G但没有5G功能。该SoC有8GB的LPDDR5内存可供支配,而集成的 阿德雷诺642L负责图形计算。

UFS 3.1内存速度很快,但它显然被SoC拖慢了,有时仍然大大低于标准的能力。然而,这在日常使用中不会被注意到。

Nova 10 Pro在基准测试中处于预期水平,并提供良好的日常性能。大多数游戏应该可以顺利地玩,而不会在细节水平上有重大损失。

两个扬声器提供了一个体面的声音,但它们有点薄,在较高音量下缺乏动力。耳机或外部扬声器可以通过USB-C端口连接。蓝牙5.2可以无线使用,但它不支持高通的aptX编解码器。

4,500毫安时的电池使华为的Nova 10 Pro有良好的电池运行时间。使用附带的100瓦电源适配器,它可以在半小时内完全充电。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
OnePlus 10T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384
1277 Points +62%
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
1158 Points +47%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
1145 Points +46%
Average of class Smartphone
  (119 - 2138, n=200, last 2 years)
920 Points +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 4G
  (786 - 790, n=2)
788 Points 0%
Huawei Nova 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 4G, Adreno 642L, 8192
786 Points
Multi-Core
OnePlus 10T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384
3987 Points +32%
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
3544 Points +18%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
3474 Points +15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 6681, n=200, last 2 years)
3044 Points +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 4G
  (3016 - 3023, n=2)
3020 Points 0%
Huawei Nova 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 4G, Adreno 642L, 8192
3016 Points
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
OnePlus 10T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384
15944 Points +44%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
14068 Points +27%
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
12136 Points +10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4609 - 21385, n=199, last 2 years)
11967 Points +8%
Huawei Nova 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 4G, Adreno 642L, 8192
11073 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 4G
  (10806 - 11073, n=2)
10940 Points -1%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
10906 Points +65%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
10206 Points +54%
Average of class Smartphone
  (704 - 23024, n=97, last 2 years)
10179 Points +54%
Huawei Nova 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 4G, Adreno 642L, 8192
6623 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 4G
  ()
6623 Points 0%
OnePlus 10T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384
1067 Points -84%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics
OnePlus 10T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384
27685 Points +264%
Average of class Smartphone
  (607 - 45492, n=96, last 2 years)
18063 Points +137%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
17842 Points +134%
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
15730 Points +107%
Huawei Nova 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 4G, Adreno 642L, 8192
7609 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 4G
  ()
7609 Points 0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
5260 Points +15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1075 - 8749, n=96, last 2 years)
4664 Points +2%
Huawei Nova 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 4G, Adreno 642L, 8192
4557 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 4G
  ()
4557 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
4086 Points -10%
OnePlus 10T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384
3341 Points -27%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 4G
  (5002 - 5025, n=2)
5014 Points 0%
Huawei Nova 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 4G, Adreno 642L, 8192
5002 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (286 - 7890, n=93, last 2 years)
2717 Points -46%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
Points -100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Huawei Nova 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 4G, Adreno 642L, 8192
5197 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 4G
  (5179 - 5197, n=2)
5188 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (240 - 9814, n=93, last 2 years)
2712 Points -48%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
0 Points -100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 4G
  (4422 - 4550, n=2)
4486 Points +1%
Huawei Nova 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 4G, Adreno 642L, 8192
4422 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (858 - 4679, n=93, last 2 years)
3140 Points -29%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
0 Points -100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
OnePlus 10T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384
9255 Points +74%
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
8677 Points +63%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
8268 Points +55%
Average of class Smartphone
  (317 - 20131, n=171, last 2 years)
7036 Points +32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 4G
  (5334 - 5515, n=2)
5425 Points +2%
Huawei Nova 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 4G, Adreno 642L, 8192
5334 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
OnePlus 10T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384
19768 Points +252%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
11893 Points +112%
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
10930 Points +95%
Average of class Smartphone
  (267 - 33376, n=170, last 2 years)
10182 Points +82%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 4G
  (5608 - 5610, n=2)
5609 Points 0%
Huawei Nova 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 4G, Adreno 642L, 8192
5608 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
5040 Points +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 4G
  (4555 - 5206, n=2)
4881 Points +7%
Huawei Nova 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 4G, Adreno 642L, 8192
4555 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (877 - 8480, n=170, last 2 years)
4347 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
4000 Points -12%
OnePlus 10T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384
3224 Points -29%
GFXBench
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S22
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
66 fps +154%
OnePlus 10T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384
60 fps +131%
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
57 fps +119%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.6 - 123, n=212, last 2 years)
45.4 fps +75%
Huawei Nova 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 4G, Adreno 642L, 8192
26 fps
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 4G
  (26 - 26, n=2)
26 fps 0%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
OnePlus 10T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384
123 fps +224%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
67 fps +76%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.3 - 229, n=212, last 2 years)
66.5 fps +75%
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
65 fps +71%
Huawei Nova 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 4G, Adreno 642L, 8192
38 fps
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 4G
  (35 - 38, n=2)
36.5 fps -4%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
OnePlus 10T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384
59 fps +269%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
51 fps +219%
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
36 fps +125%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 119, n=212, last 2 years)
33.6 fps +110%
Huawei Nova 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 4G, Adreno 642L, 8192
16 fps
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 4G
  (16 - 16, n=2)
16 fps 0%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
OnePlus 10T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384
44 fps +214%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
29 fps +107%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 94, n=212, last 2 years)
26.8 fps +91%
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
24 fps +71%
Huawei Nova 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 4G, Adreno 642L, 8192
14 fps
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 4G
  (13 - 14, n=2)
13.5 fps -4%
3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
OnePlus 10T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384
20 fps +223%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.38 - 42, n=209, last 2 years)
12.7 fps +105%
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
11 fps +77%
Huawei Nova 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 4G, Adreno 642L, 8192
6.2 fps
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 4G
  (5.9 - 6.2, n=2)
6.05 fps -2%
Octane V2 - Total Score
OnePlus 10T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384
39982 Points +88%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
38992 Points +84%
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
37446 Points +76%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2228 - 89112, n=206, last 2 years)
33824 Points +59%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 4G
  (21233 - 29489, n=2)
25361 Points +19%
Huawei Nova 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 4G, Adreno 642L, 8192
21233 Points
Huawei Nova 10 ProSamsung Galaxy S22OnePlus 10TMotorola Edge 30 FusionAverage 256 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
20%
2%
20%
36%
26%
Sequential Read 256KB
1013.91
1486
47%
1568.37
55%
1870.18
84%
Sequential Write 256KB
846.82
993
17%
847.69
0%
689.24
-19%
Random Read 4KB
218.19
273
25%
173.45
-21%
248.86
14%
Random Write 4KB
280.18
257.6
-8%
211.24
-25%
276.74
-1%

温度

Max. Load
 34.4 °C34.5 °C33.8 °C 
 34.8 °C34.2 °C31.7 °C 
 34.3 °C34.2 °C31.6 °C 
Maximum: 34.8 °C
Average: 33.7 °C
29.9 °C31.9 °C33.5 °C
29.6 °C32 °C34 °C
29.7 °C30.3 °C33.5 °C
Maximum: 34 °C
Average: 31.6 °C
Power Supply (max.)  27.5 °C | Room Temperature 21.8 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.7 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34.8 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.1 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.


演讲者

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.636.42535.226.93132.628.8402922.35037.435.76330.625.78029.31910026.730.312524.339.316022.549.920018.850.925016.2523151253.84009.957.250011.765.363010.364.180011.964.510001267.1125012.168.616001268.1200012.175.7250012.775315012.776.2400012.973.6500013.369630013.269.1800013.667.41000013.666.81250013.366.71600012.763.6SPL25.183.8N0.754.1median 12.7median 66.7Delta26.135.634.535.231.532.628.92930.137.434.430.630.529.333.226.733.824.34122.550.918.853.416.256.81263.49.963.111.772.610.377.211.975.31276.612.176.41274.812.177.912.777.312.780.412.979.313.377.813.27613.672.913.670.113.371.612.763.925.188.90.779median 12.7median 74.828.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHuawei Nova 10 ProMotorola Edge 30 Fusion
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Huawei Nova 10 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 21% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Motorola Edge 30 Fusion audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命

Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing
Average of class Smartphone
  (476 - 2844, n=213, last 2 years)
929 min +38%
OnePlus 10T
4800 mAh
856 min +27%
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
4400 mAh
686 min +2%
Samsung Galaxy S22
3700 mAh
675 min 0%
Huawei Nova 10 Pro
4500 mAh
674 min
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing (Huawei Browser 11.1)
11h 14min

Pros

+ 明亮而准确的120赫兹显示屏
+ 良好的主摄像头和自拍镜
+ 100瓦特的快速充电

Cons

- 没有IP认证
- 没有5G
- 没有Wi-Fi 6E
- 没有谷歌服务
- 旧软件

结论 - 一个昂贵的小众智能手机

在审查中。华为Nova 10 Pro。测试设备由华为德国公司提供。
在审查中。华为Nova 10 Pro。测试设备由华为德国公司提供。

在技术上,华为通过Nova 10 Pro提供了一个很好的智能手机,其吸引人的外观也令人印象深刻。两侧都有一个好的摄像头,快速充电也在进行中,显示屏也在测试中提供了良好的结果。

华为新星10 Pro以其雄心勃勃的价格挡住了自己的路

然而,对于超过700欧元的MSRP来说,有几块钱需要吞下。华为Nova 10 Pro的 骁龙778G已经不是很先进了,不支持5G。EMUI似乎也没有得到非常热情的维护。第12版仍在使用Android 11,最后的安全补丁也在前段时间发布。更不用说缺失的谷歌服务了。

因此,华为退缩并再次将Nova 10 Pro撤出市场可能并不那么令人惊讶。在华为的网站,该信息仍然可以看到但那里已经不能购买了。强大的替代品是 Galaxy S22摩托罗拉Edge 30 Fusion.

价格和可用性

尽管华为Nova 10 Pro已正式不再在德国市场上销售,但其余商品仍可在GalaxusAlza.de仍有售。较小的姐妹机型Nova 10也仍然通过亚马逊销售。.

Huawei Nova 10 Pro - 12/02/2022 v7 (old)
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis
84%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
92%
Connectivity
51 / 70 → 73%
Weight
89%
Battery
89%
Display
93%
Games Performance
57 / 64 → 89%
Application Performance
81 / 86 → 95%
Temperature
92%
Noise
0%
Audio
82 / 90 → 91%
Camera
71%
Average
79%
86%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 华为Nova 10 Pro评测--配备60MP自拍镜的高端智能手机
Daniel Schmidt, 2022-12- 4 (Update: 2022-12- 4)