摩托罗拉Moto G52智能手机评测--经济实惠的90Hz OLED手机，带立体声和50MP

Name: Motorola Moto G52
Brand: Motorola

比Redmi Note 11好吗？ 通过Moto G52，摩托罗拉创造了一款经济实惠的Moto手机，在我们的测试中实现了非常长的运行时间。此外，明亮的90-Hz OLED显示屏是其价格范围内最好的显示屏之一。然而，摩托罗拉Moto G52也有一个很大的缺点。

Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 07/16/2022 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Touchscreen Smartphone Android

的摩托罗拉Moto G52是一款价格低廉的中档手机，其建议零售价仅为295美元。在如此低的价格下，这款Moto智能手机采用了OLED面板，刷新率达到了90Hz的高速。在Moto G52的引擎盖下，有一个高通Snapdragon 680，4GB内存和128GB闪存，以及一个5000万像素的主摄像头。

摩托罗拉手机的电池容量为5000毫安时，可在30瓦特下充电。边缘的指纹传感器、集成的3.5毫米耳机插孔和双扬声器设置使其功能更加完善。

Test device courtesy of motorola Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Motorola Moto G52 (Moto G50 Series)

Processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G 8 x 1.8 - 2.4 GHz, Kryo 265 Gold (Cortex-A73) / Silver (Cortex-A53)

Graphics adapter

Qualcomm Adreno 610

Memory

4 GB

Display

6.60 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 399 PPI, Capacitive touchscreen, AMOLED, glossy: yes, HDR, 90 Hz

Storage

128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 128 GB

, 110 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: 3.5mm jack, Card Reader: microSD up to 1TB, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, OTG, Miracast, FM Radio

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G (850/900/1800/1900), 3G (B1/B2/B5/B8), 4G (B1/B2/B3/B5/B7/B8/B18/B19/B20/B26/B28/B38/B40/B41), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 8 x 160.1 x 74.5

Battery

5000 mAh Lithium-Polymer

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 12

Camera

Primary Camera: 50 MPix (f/1.8, 1/2.76", 0.64µm) + 8MP (f/2.2, 1/4.0", 1.12µm) + 2MP (f/2.4)
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix (f/2.5, 1.0µm)

Additional features

Speakers: Strereo, Keyboard: Virtual, Charger, case, USB cable, MyUX, 24 Months Warranty, SAR - 0.690W/kg head, 1.010W/kg body, widevine L1, fanless

Weight

169 g, Power Supply: 91 g

Price

295 Euro

Links

Motorola homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

与可能的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Drive	Size	Resolution
81 %	07/2022	Motorola Moto G52 SD 680, Adreno 610	169 g	128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	6.60"	2400x1080
80 %	05/2022	Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 SD 680, Adreno 610	179 g	64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	6.43"	2400x1080
80.5 %	01/2022	Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2	195 g	128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	6.60"	2400x1080
83.2 %	07/2022	Samsung Galaxy A33 5G Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4	186 g	128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	6.40"	2400x1080
80.2 %	05/2022	Realme 9 5G SD 695 5G, Adreno 619	191 g	64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	6.60"	2412x1080

案例 - 具有IP认证的摩托罗拉手机

尽管体积相当大，但Moto G52的重量只有169克（约5.96盎司），相对较低，再加上圆润的背部，使其具有良好的操作性能。重量低是因为包括框架和背部在内的部件使用了塑料。后者有炭灰或瓷白两种颜色可供选择。然而，与玻璃版本相比，轻度光泽的后盖感觉不那么高级，如小米11 Lite 5G的后盖。小米11 Lite 5G.

我们对这款中档手机的制造质量感到满意。Moto G52还带有IP认证IP52，这意味着它具有防水设计。因此，它可以防止洒出的饮料或小雨带来的飞溅水。然而，Moto G52的设计并不是为了浸泡在水中或其他液体中。

虽然摩托罗拉没有说明正面使用的材料，但有一个平面OLED面板。由于它被相当薄的边框所包围，它的屏占比达到了86%以上。

尺寸比较

Realme 9 5G Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G Motorola Moto G52 Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Samsung Galaxy A33 5G DIN A6 ❌

连接性--Moto G52有一个3.5毫米耳机插孔

Moto G52具有FM收音机、无线视频传输（Miracast）和USB-OTG，以简化外部配件的连接。对于有线数据传输，有一个符合USB-2.0标准的USB type-C端口。

内部UFS存储的容量为128GB。在考虑到Android 操作系统和预装应用程序所占用的空间后，用户出厂时只有110GB可用。存储空间可以通过microSD卡扩展到1TB。

微型SD卡读卡器

我们在参考存储卡AV PRO V60的帮助下测量卡槽的传输速度。根据CPDT基准测试，Moto手机的表现非常好，尽管特别是连续写入速度可以稍微高一点。在我们的JPEG拷贝测试中，我们只测出了低于21MB/s的平均结果。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	59.21 MB/s +188%
Average of class Smartphone (10.9 - 77, n=97, last 2 years)	28.3 MB/s +38%
Realme 9 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird V60)	26.3 MB/s +28%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	24.74 MB/s +20%
Motorola Moto G52 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Angelbird V60)	20.56 MB/s
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	15.47 MB/s -25%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

Motorola Moto G52 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø31.4 (18.8-44.2)

Samsung Galaxy A33 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø43.7 (29-56.7)

Motorola Moto G52 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø76.3 (26.5-87.4)

Samsung Galaxy A33 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø83.8 (43.5-112.8)

软件 - 摩托罗拉手机与Android 12

通过MyUX，摩托罗拉在谷歌的Android 。它包括熟悉的Moto Experiences和无数的定制选项，安装了一个干净而简约的系统用户界面。在测试时，我们的Moto G52运行的是Android 12版本，带有2022年3月开始的稍微过时的安全补丁。更新计划在发布后的2年内进行，包括2024年初。

摩托罗拉自己的Ready-for功能不包括在Moto G52的MyUX用户界面中，但是这款价格低廉的摩托罗拉中端机确实支持名为ThinkShield for Mobile的硬件和软件安全功能。对于收到的通知，没有真正的永远在线显示功能。相反，Moto G52配备了摩托罗拉熟悉的预览显示功能，在提起智能手机时显示信息。

通信和GNSS - 带有NFC的Moto G52

在通信标准方面，Moto G52支持蓝牙5.0和用于非接触式支付的NFC。由于支持Wi-Fi 5，Moto手机在我们的Wi-Fi网络中表现良好，尽管Moto G52不可能在homen网络中达到高传输速度。当连接到我们的参考路由器华硕ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000时，这款中档智能手机实现了稳定的速度。

当涉及到移动网络时，由于集成了高通X11调制解调器，Moto手机只支持LTE速度，而5G是不存在的。摩托罗拉手机也可能不适合远行，因为LTE频段支持有限。不过，Moto G52的国内频率范围对4G网络来说是令人满意的。

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Average of class Smartphone (34.8 - 1875, n=209, last 2 years)	655 MBit/s +131%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	343 (337^min - 348^max) MBit/s +21%
Realme 9 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	341 (330^min - 352^max) MBit/s +20%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	298 (198^min - 345^max) MBit/s +5%
Motorola Moto G52 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	283 (244^min - 311^max) MBit/s
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Average of class Smartphone (40.5 - 1810, n=210, last 2 years)	692 MBit/s +137%
Realme 9 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	362 (329^min - 376^max) MBit/s +24%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	322 (162^min - 386^max) MBit/s +10%
Motorola Moto G52 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	292 MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	268 (133^min - 280^max) MBit/s -8%

Motorola Moto G52; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø283 (244-311)

Motorola Moto G52; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø303 (224-341)

为了判断我们的测试设备在实践中的地理定位能力的精度，我们同时用Garmin Venu 2记录我们的轨迹，以便进行比较。卫星系统GPS（L1）、GLONASS、BeiDou和Galileo（E1）以及SBAS被用来确定我们的位置。

在我们长度为4公里（约2.49英里）的测试轨道上，与智能手表相比，我们的中档智能手机的偏差相当小。对GPS记录的详细观察显示，Moto G52在精确度方面与Garmin设备相似，这使得Moto智能手机成为普通导航任务的一个好选择。然而，Moto手机往往会偷工减料。

电话和通话质量 - 双卡双待的Moto G52

这款双卡手机支持两张nano SIM卡和一张附加存储卡。在安静的环境中，Moto G52的通话质量很好，免提电话可以在视频通话时进行清晰的沟通。即使在距离手机1米（约3.28英尺）的地方，我们的声音仍然清晰可闻。

摄像机 - 摩托罗拉智能手机的三摄像头

显示屏顶部小孔内的前置摄像头的分辨率为16MP。在日光下，自拍提供了良好的清晰度和体面的色彩表现。然而，用人像模式拍摄的前置摄像头照片往往看起来曝光过度，背景被烧毁。

在背面，摩托罗拉安装了一个三摄像头，有一个5000万像素的主摄像头和一个f/1.8光圈。三星S5KJN1，这也是由 Redmi Note 11，将四个像素分别组合成一个超级像素，捕捉更多的光线。这导致了1250万像素的照片，尽管一种特殊模式也允许用户利用全分辨率。

在日光下，Moto G52的照片对于一款中档手机来说效果不错，尽管曝光和清晰度可以更好。在这一点上，Moto G52 Redmi Note 11表现略好，色彩表现也略胜一筹。

虽然微距光学在日常使用中用途有限，但相对于300美元以下的价格范围，800万像素的超宽镜头以大视野和良好的质量而闪耀。也就是说，照片在靠近边缘的地方出现了扭曲，清晰度有待提高。

所有相机的视频记录都限制在全高清和30 FPS。在视频录制过程中，在主镜头和广角镜头之间进行切换是不可能的。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Hauptkamera Hauptkamera Low Light Weitwinkel

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

我们在受控的照明条件下，用ColorChecker护照分析了50-MP光学器件与参考色之间的色彩准确性。除了典型的智能手机增亮外，Moto G52还显示出相当大的ColorChecker偏差。然而，考虑到价格，在色彩准确性方面的异常值（>15）仍然是可以接受的。

配件和保修 - 摩托罗拉手机带充电器

Moto G52的包装包括一个模块化的33瓦充电器，一条数据/充电线，一个盖子，一个SIM卡针，以及一份包括保修信息的快速入门指南。

标准的12个月保修期适用。Moto G52有一个可选的延长保修期，涵盖另外12个月的机械故障。可选的事故保护被称为Moto Care(99美元，为期2年），包括针对水和物理损坏的额外保护。

输入设备和操作 - 带有FaceUnlock的Moto G52

虽然电源键上的集成指纹传感器能可靠地解锁Moto G52，但它的速度并不快。从待机状态唤醒显示屏也是一件有些迟缓的事情。通过前置摄像头的二维面部识别FaceUnlock在日常使用中运行良好，尽管它不是很安全。

6.6英寸OLED显示屏上的输入被精确地执行，一直到触摸屏的角落里。由于90赫兹的高刷新率，动画和滚动的网页在大多数情况下看起来都很流畅。

显示屏 - 采用OLED面板的Moto手机

Moto G52采用6.6英寸AMOLED显示屏，分辨率为2400x1080像素，刷新率为60或90赫兹。另外，用户也可以让手机在这两个刷新率之间自动切换。

在亮度和照度方面，摩托罗拉手机属于优秀的范围。 Redmi Note 11.在显示纯白色图像时，我们测得的峰值为664尼特。在APL50测试中，在亮区和暗区均匀分布的情况下，我们在屏幕中心测量到几乎相同的651尼特。这使得HDR10面板成为播放高动态范围的内容的次优选择。

由于底层的OLED技术，Moto手机受到了屏幕闪烁的影响。虽然我们检测到约90赫兹的低PWM频率，但周期至少是一致的。不管怎么说，这可能会影响敏感的用户，幸好他们可以从设置菜单中启用可选的直流调光模式（防闪烁）。


633 cd/m²	648 cd/m²	659 cd/m²
635 cd/m²	655 cd/m²	664 cd/m²
633 cd/m²	651 cd/m²	661 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 664 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 648.8 cd/m² Minimum: 2 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 95 %
Center on Battery: 655 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 1.7 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
94.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.212

	Motorola Moto G52 AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.60	Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 OLED, 2400x1080, 6.43	Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G TFT-LCD, 2400x1080, 6.60	Samsung Galaxy A33 5G Super AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.40	Realme 9 5G IPS, 2412x1080, 6.60
Screen		9%	-87%	-2%	-133%
Brightness middle	655	702 7%	504 -23%	693 6%	589 -10%
Brightness	649	701 8%	499 -23%	695 7%	561 -14%
Brightness Distribution	95	98 3%	91 -4%	98 3%	90 -5%
Black Level *			0.72		0.5
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.1	1 9%	3.3 -200%	1.3 -18%	4.33 -294%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	2.58	2.3 11%	6 -133%	3.5 -36%	8.39 -225%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	1.7	1.4 18%	4.1 -141%	1.3 24%	5.9 -247%
Gamma	2.212 ^99%	2.2 ^100%	2.28 ^96%	2.14 ^103%	2.063 ^107%
CCT	6557 ^99%	6520 ^100%	7041 ^92%	6530 ^100%	8021 ^81%
Contrast			700		1178

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

90.1 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 90.1 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 90.1 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

在固定的变焦水平和不同的亮度设置下进行测量

虽然Moto手机在色彩平衡方面没有提供太多的定制，但用户至少可以在两个不同的配置文件中进行选择。在这两种情况下，色温可以调整，而饱和度等个别参数不能调整。

我们用CalMAN软件和分光光度计进行的测试表明，AMOLED面板非常准确，色彩偏差很低（配置文件：自然）。由于OLED技术允许个别像素完全关闭，显示 "绝对 "黑色是可能的，而且对比度（理论上）接近无限大。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
12 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 6 ms rise
12 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 6 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 26 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
13 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 7 ms rise
13 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 6 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 21 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

由于高亮度，Moto G52非常适合日常户外使用。尽管高对比度仍然允许用户在阳光直射下阅读显示屏，而且屏幕上会出现眩光，但用户不应该期望有像S22 Ultra那样的亮度储备。 Galaxy S22 Ultra.

AMOLED面板的可视角度非常好，只有在从极端角度观看时，感知的亮度才会下降。

性能 - 采用高通SoC的摩托罗拉手机

摩托G52使用了一个高通Snapdragon 680.这款6纳米的SoC有四个Cortex-A73内核（2.4GHz）和四个Cortex-A53内核（1.8GHz）。图形单元 Adreno 610补充了这个处理器。在日常使用中，使用这款中档手机在大多数情况下是一种流畅的体验，尽管轻微的延迟发生得有些频繁。

在我们的基准测试套件中，Moto手机远远落后于其他手机。 Redmi Note 11.相较于三星Galaxy A33 5G，Geekbench的单核分数尤其明显较低。同样，在我们的比较中，其他设备在PCMark和浏览器测试中表现明显更好。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone (119 - 2138, n=217, last 2 years)	918 Points +143%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144	737 Points +95%
Realme 9 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096	692 Points +83%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144	598 Points +58%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	384 Points +2%
Motorola Moto G52 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	378 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (323 - 384, n=14)	373 Points -1%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone (473 - 6681, n=217, last 2 years)	3009 Points +91%
Realme 9 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096	1914 Points +22%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144	1905 Points +21%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144	1809 Points +15%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	1738 Points +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (1287 - 1738, n=14)	1580 Points 0%
Motorola Moto G52 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	1573 Points

Antutu v9 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (102602 - 1650926, n=153, last 2 years)	738503 Points +255%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144	398969 Points +92%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144	353908 Points +70%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	252044 Points +21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (201810 - 274001, n=6)	229317 Points +10%
Motorola Moto G52 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	207780 Points

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average of class Smartphone (4761 - 21385, n=213, last 2 years)	11798 Points +75%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144	11077 Points +65%
Realme 9 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096	9776 Points +45%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144	9402 Points +40%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	7694 Points +14%
Motorola Moto G52 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	6728 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (4535 - 8730, n=14)	6497 Points -3%

CrossMark - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (200 - 1474, n=165, last 2 years)	837 Points +156%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	388 Points +19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (325 - 413, n=7)	371 Points +13%
Motorola Moto G52 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	327 Points

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average of class Smartphone (411 - 11438, n=165, last 2 years)	5745 Points +123%
Realme 9 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096	3535 Points +37%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144	3477 Points +35%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144	3268 Points +27%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	2738 Points +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (2551 - 2738, n=7)	2600 Points +1%
Motorola Moto G52 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	2573 Points
System
Average of class Smartphone (2376 - 16475, n=165, last 2 years)	9678 Points +69%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144	7184 Points +25%
Realme 9 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096	6969 Points +21%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144	6361 Points +11%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	5794 Points +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (5580 - 5852, n=7)	5744 Points 0%
Motorola Moto G52 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	5739 Points
Memory
Average of class Smartphone (670 - 12716, n=165, last 2 years)	6250 Points +79%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144	4589 Points +32%
Realme 9 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096	4366 Points +25%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144	3829 Points +10%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	3824 Points +10%
Motorola Moto G52 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	3483 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (3120 - 3824, n=7)	3466 Points 0%
Graphics
Average of class Smartphone (697 - 58651, n=165, last 2 years)	14101 Points +546%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144	5104 Points +134%
Realme 9 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096	4413 Points +102%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144	2929 Points +34%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	2183 Points 0%
Motorola Moto G52 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	2182 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (1994 - 2183, n=7)	2134 Points -2%
Web
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 2145, n=165, last 2 years)	1494 Points +63%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144	1334 Points +45%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	1199 Points +31%
Realme 9 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096	1163 Points +27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (917 - 1199, n=7)	1073 Points +17%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144	1041 Points +14%
Motorola Moto G52 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	917 Points

AImark - Score v2.x
Average of class Smartphone (1043 - 139804, n=50, last 2 years)	21146 Points +335%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144	9008 Points +85%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	4995 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144	4926 Points +1%
Motorola Moto G52 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	4859 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (4320 - 4995, n=5)	4747 Points -2%

在图形基准测试中，Moto G52的表现更好，它和其他同类产品持平。 Redmi Note 11.配备了 Dimensity 810和 Exynos 1280，分别是 Poco M4 Pro和 Galaxy A33 5G的速度有时是两倍，但是。与强大的中端竞争对手相比，的骁龙680是不合格的。

3DMark | GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | GFXBench 3.0 | GFXBench 3.1 | GFXBench

3DMark
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	617 Points +406%
Realme 9 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	352 Points +189%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	348 Points +185%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	124 Points +2%
Motorola Moto G52 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	122 Points
Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	632 Points +450%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	360 Points +213%
Realme 9 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	356 Points +210%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	127 Points +10%
Motorola Moto G52 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	115 Points
Wild Life Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2238 Points +383%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1210 Points +161%
Realme 9 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1197 Points +159%
Motorola Moto G52 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	463 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	435 Points -6%
Wild Life Score
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2262 Points +395%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1235 Points +170%
Realme 9 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1197 Points +162%
Motorola Moto G52 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	457 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	447 Points -2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics
Realme 9 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2883 Points +15%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2882 Points +15%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2594 Points +3%
Motorola Moto G52 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	2511 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2375 Points -5%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3911 Points +239%
Realme 9 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2749 Points +138%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2396 Points +108%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1155 Points 0%
Motorola Moto G52 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	1153 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3514 Points +171%
Realme 9 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2778 Points +114%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2489 Points +92%
Motorola Moto G52 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	1299 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1253 Points -4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3804 Points +42%
Realme 9 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3462 Points +29%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3035 Points +14%
Motorola Moto G52 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	2674 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2573 Points -4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3922 Points +216%
Realme 9 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3008 Points +142%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2570 Points +107%
Motorola Moto G52 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	1242 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1199 Points -3%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3683 Points +169%
Realme 9 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3098 Points +127%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2770 Points +103%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1372 Points 0%
Motorola Moto G52 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	1367 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3553 Points +34%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2833 Points +7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2654 Points 0%
Motorola Moto G52 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	2644 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	5216 Points +152%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3846 Points +86%
Motorola Moto G52 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	2067 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1995 Points -3%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	4395 Points +105%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3777 Points +76%
Motorola Moto G52 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	2145 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2113 Points -1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3592 Points +165%
Realme 9 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2949 Points +117%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2714 Points +100%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1365 Points +1%
Motorola Moto G52 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	1357 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3885 Points +237%
Realme 9 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2831 Points +145%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2546 Points +121%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1188 Points +3%
Motorola Moto G52 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	1154 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3529 Points +29%
Realme 9 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3455 Points +26%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2842 Points +4%
Motorola Moto G52 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	2738 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2683 Points -2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	4630 Points +111%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3965 Points +81%
Motorola Moto G52 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	2190 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2085 Points -5%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	5418 Points +158%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	4014 Points +92%
Motorola Moto G52 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	2096 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1931 Points -8%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3801 Points +41%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3069 Points +14%
Motorola Moto G52 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	2696 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2589 Points -4%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	78 fps +117%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	56 fps +56%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	37 fps +3%
Motorola Moto G52 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	36 fps
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	91 fps +122%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	66 fps +61%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	42 fps +2%
Motorola Moto G52 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	41 fps

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	59 fps +195%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	36 fps +80%
Motorola Moto G52 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	20 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	17 fps -15%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	60 fps +173%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	40 fps +82%
Motorola Moto G52 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	22 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	20 fps -9%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	37 fps +185%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	23 fps +77%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	13 fps 0%
Motorola Moto G52 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	13 fps
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	38 fps +153%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	26 fps +73%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	16 fps +7%
Motorola Moto G52 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	15 fps

GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	21 fps +184%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	13 fps +76%
Motorola Moto G52 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	7.4 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	7.3 fps -1%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	23 fps +161%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	16 fps +82%
Motorola Moto G52 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	8.8 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	8.6 fps -2%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	16 fps +202%
Realme 9 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	12 fps +126%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	9.3 fps +75%
Motorola Moto G52 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	5.3 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	5 fps -6%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	10 fps +614%
Realme 9 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	7.8 fps +457%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	6.2 fps +343%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3.2 fps +129%
Motorola Moto G52 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	1.4 fps
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	25 fps +163%
Realme 9 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	19 fps +100%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	15 fps +58%
Motorola Moto G52 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	9.5 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	8.8 fps -7%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	26 fps +410%
Realme 9 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	21 fps +312%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	17 fps +233%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	9.8 fps +92%
Motorola Moto G52 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	5.1 fps

Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | WebXPRT 3 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 351, n=173, last 2 years)	106.1 Points +160%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G (Chrome)	66.011 Points +62%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G (Chrome 96)	43.83 Points +8%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 (Chrome 101)	43.525 Points +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (35.7 - 52.9, n=7)	43.4 Points +7%
Motorola Moto G52 (Chrome 103)	40.743 Points

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (14.9 - 445, n=157, last 2 years)	107.1 runs/min +186%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G (Chrome)	47.99 runs/min +28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (32.7 - 53.5, n=7)	40.2 runs/min +7%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G (Chrome 96)	39.8 runs/min +6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 (Chrome 101)	39.64 runs/min +6%
Motorola Moto G52 (Chrome 103)	37.48 runs/min

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (39 - 304, n=122, last 2 years)	133.1 Points +122%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G (Chrome 102.0.5005.99)	82 Points +37%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (58 - 93, n=6)	67.8 Points +13%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 (Chrome 101)	67 Points +12%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G (Chrome 96)	62 Points +3%
Motorola Moto G52 (Chrome 103)	60 Points

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (4633 - 89112, n=211, last 2 years)	33640 Points +172%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G (Chrome 102.0.5005.99)	24521 Points +98%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G (Chrome 96)	19010 Points +53%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 (Chrome 101)	13056 Points +5%
Motorola Moto G52 (Chrome 103)	12386 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (6358 - 14279, n=11)	11432 Points -8%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 (Chrome 101)	3234.1 ms * -2%
Motorola Moto G52 (Chrome 103)	3183.3 ms *
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (2650 - 3461, n=6)	3124 ms * +2%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G (Chrome 96)	2410 ms * +24%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G (Chrome)	1856.6 ms * +42%
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=173, last 2 years)	1595 ms * +50%

* ... smaller is better

Moto G52的UFS存储提供中等的读写速度，小数据块的速度特别慢。

	Motorola Moto G52	Xiaomi Redmi Note 11	Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G	Samsung Galaxy A33 5G	Realme 9 5G	Average 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		17%	12%	20%	-45%	-8%	97%
Sequential Read 256KB	893.44	895.34 0%	964 8%	512.84 -43%	511 -43%	760 ?(427 - 1011, n=113) -15%	1505 ?(226 - 4512, n=215, last 2 years) 68%
Sequential Write 256KB	503.56	519.23 3%	471 -6%	487.66 -3%	120.6 -76%	297 ?(13.6 - 719, n=113) -41%	1112 ?(57.5 - 3678, n=215, last 2 years) 121%
Random Read 4KB	98.99	172.95 75%	148.8 50%	216.48 119%	88.5 -11%	152.9 ?(92.6 - 239, n=113) 54%	247 ?(22.2 - 543, n=215, last 2 years) 150%
Random Write 4KB	182.92	163.29 -11%	171.8 -6%	194.12 6%	95.4 -48%	131.6 ?(18.2 - 290, n=113) -28%	271 ?(13 - 709, n=215, last 2 years) 48%

游戏--Moto G52仅达到30 FPS

我们使用GameBench应用程序来仔细看看Moto G52的游戏性能。为了能够运行要求更高的游戏，Motorla手机集成了一个 Adreno 610以获得足够的图形性能，尽管安装的GPU是一个入门级单元。

因此，《PUBG Mobile》只能在低细节下播放，而不能选择中等细节设置（高清）。在最低的细节设置下，Moto G52可以管理大约30 FPS，而更好的图形会导致帧率下降到25 FPS。

理论上支持144FPS的竞技场射击游戏Armajet运行平稳，但Moto手机再次被限制在30FPS。平均而言，低波动导致每秒30帧的稳定帧率。

Motorola Moto G52; Armajet: Ø29.9 (27-31)

Motorola Moto G52; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø29.7 (23-31)

Motorola Moto G52; PUBG Mobile; Balanced: Ø24.9 (24-26)

排放 - 摩托罗拉手机变暖

温度

在负载下，Moto手机的表面热量发展并不均匀。我们记录的非关键最高温度为42.8°C（110.84°F），Moto G52的内部热量发展并没有导致高通SoC的节流。

GFXBench和Wild Life的压力测试说明，在负载增加的情况下，性能只是略有下降。

Max. Load

Idle


40.8 °C	36.7 °C	33.7 °C
40 °C	36 °C	34.4 °C
39.8 °C	36.3 °C	34.1 °C

Maximum: 40.8 °C
Average: 36.9 °C


33.5 °C	36.4 °C	42.8 °C
34 °C	36.3 °C	42.8 °C
34.4 °C	37.3 °C	42 °C

Maximum: 42.8 °C
Average: 37.7 °C

Power Supply (max.) 41.3 °C | Room Temperature 21.6 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.9 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.8 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.8 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.9 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark - Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Motorola Moto G52 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	99.7 (2.68^min) %
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	99.6 (7.36^min) % 0%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	99.5 (13.4^min) % 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	99.1 (2.66^min) % -1%

Motorola Moto G52 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø2.68 (2.68-2.68)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø2.68 (2.66-2.69)

Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø7.38 (7.36-7.39)

Samsung Galaxy A33 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø13.5 (13.4-13.5)

Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø7.25 (7.25-7.25)

发言人

Moto G52使用了双扬声器设置，这不仅创造了立体声效果，而且还确保了足够的最大音量。相对于它的价格类别，声音很好。我们对Moto手机的测量结果显示，中音的频率响应图是线性的，高音则略有下降。其实没有任何低音。

使用无线或有线耳机的音频体验也很愉快。Moto G52的3.5毫米耳机插孔可以让音乐播放有更多低音。除了耳机插孔，蓝牙5.0包括SBC、AAC、aptX HD和aptX Adaptive以及LDAC和LHDC编解码。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Motorola Moto G52 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 17% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 39% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 16% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 38% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 - 配备5000毫安时的摩托罗拉手机

能源消耗

这款moto手机的电池容量为5000 mAh。凭借制造商自己的快速充电技术，在30瓦特的条件下为手机完全充电只需要大约80分钟。方便的是，这款中档智能手机附带了一个合适的充电器。

Moto G52的整体能耗并无异常。在负载情况下，它的耗电量要比 Redmi Note 11和它的骁龙680.

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0 / 0.2 Watt
Idle	0.8 / 1.1 / 1.5 Watt
Load	2.9 / 5 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Motorola Moto G52 5000 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 5000 mAh	Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G 5000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A33 5G 5000 mAh	Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		-23%	-24%	-33%	-58%	-42%
Idle Minimum *	0.8	1.06 -33%	0.51 36%	0.88 -10%	1.015 ?(0.63 - 1.5, n=6) -27%	0.897 ?(0.42 - 2.37, n=162, last 2 years) -12%
Idle Average *	1.1	1.93 -75%	1.96 -78%	1.47 -34%	2.1 ?(1.1 - 4.25, n=6) -91%	1.452 ?(0.69 - 4.26, n=162, last 2 years) -32%
Idle Maximum *	1.5	1.96 -31%	2.01 -34%	1.52 -1%	2.45 ?(1.5 - 4.34, n=6) -63%	1.629 ?(0.79 - 4.45, n=162, last 2 years) -9%
Load Average *	2.9	2.87 1%	3.86 -33%	5.38 -86%	4.92 ?(2.6 - 10.2, n=6) -70%	5.55 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=162, last 2 years) -91%
Load Maximum *	5	3.85 23%	5.62 -12%	6.62 -32%	6.95 ?(3.85 - 10.7, n=6) -39%	8.31 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=162, last 2 years) -66%

* ... smaller is better

Consumption: Geekbench (150 nits)

Motorola Moto G52 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G: Ø3.35 (1.451-6.19)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G: Ø3.03 (1.109-6.23)

Consumption: GFXBench (150 nits)

Motorola Moto G52 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø2.75 (1.515-3.9)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø2.88 (2.54-5.23)

Motorola Moto G52 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.005 (0.88-1.296)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.302 (1.117-1.614)

电池寿命

在我们的实际电池测试中，我们在调整后的150尼特的显示亮度下进行测试，以使结果易于比较，Moto G52在90赫兹的固定刷新率下具有出色的电池寿命。在我们的Wi-Fi测试中，Moto手机达到了18.5小时的出色运行时间，在禁用Wi-Fi模块的情况下，在我们的视频循环测试中又持续了3小时。

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		36h 23min
WiFi Websurfing		18h 22min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		21h 14min
Load (maximum brightness)		6h 38min

	Motorola Moto G52 5000 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 5000 mAh	Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G 5000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A33 5G 5000 mAh	Realme 9 5G 5000 mAh
Battery Runtime		-10%	-7%	-15%	-7%
Reader / Idle	2183	2098 -4%	2722 25%	2041 -7%
H.264	1274	1076 -16%	1008 -21%	1146 -10%
WiFi v1.3	1102	842 -24%	966 -12%	771 -30%	1029 -7%
Load	398	409 3%	322 -19%	347 -13%

Pros

+ 电池寿命长

+ 包括快速充电器

+ 良好的90-Hz OLED面板

+ 立体声

+ 良好的建造质量，包括IP认证

+ 三合一插槽

Cons

- 没有5G

- 缓慢的SoC

- 游戏性能慢

对摩托罗拉Moto G52的评判

通过Moto G52，摩托罗拉创造了一个伟大而全面的中档智能手机。作为一款廉价的中端智能手机，其广泛的功能和出色的显示质量都值得一提。Moto G52还提供了很好的制造质量，甚至还获得了IP认证，尽管对于295美元来说，我们更喜欢玻璃背面的优质触感。如果你愿意部分放弃摩托罗拉手机的出色电池寿命，那么 Redmi Note 11是一个可行的替代方案，甚至是更便宜的中档手机，具有类似的功能，更好的主摄像头，以及略微更亮的OLED面板。

如果你对快速的5G标准没有需求，Moto G52是一款神奇的中档手机，价格相当低。

考虑到Moto G52的价格，唯一真正的缺点是缺乏5G支持和相机质量。话虽如此，这款手机的性能骁龙680与这个价格范围内的大多数手机相比也较低，如 Poco M4 Pro 例如，Poco M4 Pro能够使我们测试设备的一些基准分数翻倍。对于喜欢玩奇特的Android 游戏的用户来说，稍贵的 Galaxy A33 5G是一个更好的选择。

价格和可用性

摩托罗拉Moto G52在Amazon.com上的售价为295美元左右。.

Motorola Moto G52 - 2022-08-30 08/30/2022 v7
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis

84%

Keyboard

69 / 75 → 91%

Pointing Device

89%

Connectivity

50 / 70 → 71%

Weight

91%

Battery

92%

Display

92%

Games Performance

15 / 64 → 23%

Application Performance

69 / 86 → 80%

Temperature

89%

Noise

100%

Audio

82 / 90 → 91%

Camera

59%

Average

75%

81%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Marius Schell - Tech Writer and translator - 398 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2020

contact me via: LinkedIn

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 388347 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 摩托罗拉Moto G52智能手机评测--经济实惠的90Hz OLED手机，带立体声和50MP

Marcus Herbrich, 2022-07-16 (Update: 2022-07-16)

摩托罗拉Moto G52智能手机评测--经济实惠的90Hz OLED手机，带立体声和50MP

与可能的竞争对手比较

案例 - 具有IP认证的摩托罗拉手机

尺寸比较

连接性--Moto G52有一个3.5毫米耳机插孔

微型SD卡读卡器

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

软件 - 摩托罗拉手机与Android 12

通信和GNSS - 带有NFC的Moto G52

电话和通话质量 - 双卡双待的Moto G52

摄像机 - 摩托罗拉智能手机的三摄像头

配件和保修 - 摩托罗拉手机带充电器

输入设备和操作 - 带有FaceUnlock的Moto G52

显示屏 - 采用OLED面板的Moto手机

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

性能 - 采用高通SoC的摩托罗拉手机

游戏--Moto G52仅达到30 FPS

排放 - 摩托罗拉手机变暖

温度

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

发言人

Motorola Moto G52 audio analysis

Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 audio analysis

电池寿命 - 配备5000毫安时的摩托罗拉手机

能源消耗

Consumption: Geekbench (150 nits)

Consumption: GFXBench (150 nits)

电池寿命

Pros

Cons

对摩托罗拉Moto G52的评判

价格和可用性

More articles related to this device

Pricecompare