Notebookcheck Logo

摩托罗拉Moto G52智能手机评测--经济实惠的90Hz OLED手机,带立体声和50MP

比Redmi Note 11好吗? 通过Moto G52,摩托罗拉创造了一款经济实惠的Moto手机,在我们的测试中实现了非常长的运行时间。此外,明亮的90-Hz OLED显示屏是其价格范围内最好的显示屏之一。然而,摩托罗拉Moto G52也有一个很大的缺点。
Touchscreen Smartphone Android
摩托罗拉Moto G52智能手机评测

摩托罗拉Moto G52是一款价格低廉的中档手机,其 建议零售价 仅为295美元。在如此低的价格下,这款Moto智能手机采用了OLED面板,刷新率达到了90Hz的高速。在Moto G52的引擎盖下,有一个 高通Snapdragon 680,4GB内存和128GB闪存,以及一个5000万像素的主摄像头。

摩托罗拉手机的电池容量为5000毫安时,可在30瓦特下充电。边缘的指纹传感器、集成的3.5毫米耳机插孔和双扬声器设置使其功能更加完善。

Motorola Moto G52 (Moto G50 Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G 8 x 1.8 - 2.4 GHz, Kryo 265 Gold (Cortex-A73) / Silver (Cortex-A53)
Graphics adapter
Memory
4096 MB 
Display
6.60 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 399 PPI, Capacitive touchscreen, AMOLED, glossy: yes, HDR, 90 Hz
Storage
128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 110 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: 3.5mm jack, Card Reader: microSD up to 1TB, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, OTG, Miracast, FM Radio
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B2/​B5/​B8), 4G (B1/​B2/​B3/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B18/​B19/​B20/​B26/​B28/​B38/​B40/​B41), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8 x 160.1 x 74.5
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 12
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (f/1.8, 1/2.76", 0.64µm) + 8MP (f/2.2, 1/4.0", 1.12µm) + 2MP (f/2.4)
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix (f/2.5, 1.0µm)
Additional features
Speakers: Strereo, Keyboard: Virtual, Charger, case, USB cable, MyUX, 24 Months Warranty, SAR - 0.690W/​kg head, 1.010W/​kg body, widevine L1, fanless
Weight
169 g, Power Supply: 91 g
Price
295 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

与可能的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
80.8 %
07/2022
Motorola Moto G52
SD 680, Adreno 610
169 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.60"2400x1080
79.8 %
05/2022
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
SD 680, Adreno 610
179 g64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.43"2400x1080
80.5 %
01/2022
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2
195 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.60"2400x1080
83 %
07/2022
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4
186 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.40"2400x1080
80.2 %
05/2022
realme 9 5G
SD 695 5G, Adreno 619
191 g64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.60"2412x1080

案例 - 具有IP认证的摩托罗拉手机

摩托罗拉Moto G52的瓷白色
摩托罗拉Moto G52的瓷白色

尽管体积相当大,但Moto G52的重量只有169克(约5.96盎司),相对较低,再加上圆润的背部,使其具有良好的操作性能。重量低是因为包括框架和背部在内的部件使用了塑料。后者有炭灰或瓷白两种颜色可供选择。然而,与玻璃版本相比,轻度光泽的后盖感觉不那么高级,如小米11 Lite 5G的后盖。 小米11 Lite 5G.

我们对这款中档手机的制造质量感到满意。Moto G52还带有IP认证IP52,这意味着它具有防水设计。因此,它可以防止洒出的饮料或小雨带来的飞溅水。然而,Moto G52的设计并不是为了浸泡在水中或其他液体中。

虽然摩托罗拉没有说明正面使用的材料,但有一个平面OLED面板。由于它被相当薄的边框所包围,它的屏占比达到了86%以上。

摩托罗拉Moto G52智能手机评测
摩托罗拉Moto G52智能手机评测
摩托罗拉Moto G52智能手机评测
摩托罗拉Moto G52智能手机评测
摩托罗拉Moto G52智能手机评测
摩托罗拉Moto G52智能手机评测
摩托罗拉Moto G52智能手机评测

尺寸比较

164.3 mm 75.6 mm 8.5 mm 191 g163.56 mm 75.78 mm 8.75 mm 195 g160.1 mm 74.5 mm 8 mm 169 g159.87 mm 73.87 mm 8.09 mm 179 g159.7 mm 74 mm 8.1 mm 186 g

连接性--Moto G52有一个3.5毫米耳机插孔

Moto G52具有FM收音机、无线视频传输(Miracast)和USB-OTG,以简化外部配件的连接。对于有线数据传输,有一个符合USB-2.0标准的USB type-C端口。

内部UFS存储的容量为128GB。在考虑到Android 操作系统和预装应用程序所占用的空间后,用户出厂时只有110GB可用。存储空间可以通过microSD卡扩展到1TB。

左侧(卡槽)
左侧(卡槽)
顶部(麦克风、扬声器)
顶部(麦克风、扬声器)
底部(扬声器、USB接口、麦克风、3.5毫米耳机插孔)。
底部(扬声器、USB接口、麦克风、3.5毫米耳机插孔)。
右边(按钮)
右边(按钮)

微型SD卡读卡器

我们在参考存储卡AV PRO V60的帮助下测量卡槽的传输速度。根据CPDT基准测试,Moto手机的表现非常好,尽管特别是连续写入速度可以稍微高一点。在我们的JPEG拷贝测试中,我们只测出了低于21MB/s的平均结果。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
59.21 MB/s ∼100% +188%
realme 9 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird V60)
26.3 MB/s ∼44% +28%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10.9 - 59.2, n=99, last 2 years)
26.3 MB/s ∼44% +28%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
24.74 MB/s ∼42% +20%
Motorola Moto G52
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Angelbird V60)
20.56 MB/s ∼35%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
15.47 MB/s ∼26% -25%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

0102030405060708090100110Tooltip
Motorola Moto G52 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø31.4 (18.8-44.2)
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø43.7 (29-56.7)
Motorola Moto G52 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø76.3 (26.5-87.4)
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø83.8 (43.5-112.8)

软件 - 摩托罗拉手机与Android 12

通过MyUX,摩托罗拉在谷歌的Android 。它包括熟悉的Moto Experiences和无数的定制选项,安装了一个干净而简约的系统用户界面。在测试时,我们的Moto G52运行的是Android 12版本,带有2022年3月开始的稍微过时的安全补丁。更新计划在发布后的2年内进行,包括2024年初。

摩托罗拉自己的Ready-for功能不包括在Moto G52的MyUX用户界面中,但是这款价格低廉的摩托罗拉中端机确实支持名为ThinkShield for Mobile的硬件和软件安全功能。对于收到的通知,没有真正的永远在线显示功能。相反,Moto G52配备了摩托罗拉熟悉的预览显示功能,在提起智能手机时显示信息。

摩托罗拉Moto G52智能手机评测
摩托罗拉Moto G52智能手机评测
摩托罗拉Moto G52智能手机评测
摩托罗拉Moto G52智能手机评测

通信和GNSS - 带有NFC的Moto G52

在通信标准方面,Moto G52支持蓝牙5.0和用于非接触式支付的NFC。由于支持Wi-Fi 5,Moto手机在我们的Wi-Fi网络中表现良好,尽管Moto G52不可能在homen网络中达到高传输速度。当连接到我们的参考路由器华硕ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000时,这款中档智能手机实现了稳定的速度。

当涉及到移动网络时,由于集成了高通X11调制解调器,Moto手机只支持LTE速度,而5G是不存在的。摩托罗拉手机也可能不适合远行,因为LTE频段支持有限。不过,Moto G52的国内频率范围对4G网络来说是令人满意的。

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Average of class Smartphone
  (44.3 - 1736, n=73, last 2 years)
615 MBit/s ∼100% +117%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
343 (337min - 348max) MBit/s ∼56% +21%
realme 9 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
341 (330min - 352max) MBit/s ∼55% +20%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
298 (198min - 345max) MBit/s ∼48% +5%
Motorola Moto G52
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
283 (244min - 311max) MBit/s ∼46%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Average of class Smartphone
  (61.4 - 1710, n=74, last 2 years)
645 MBit/s ∼100% +121%
realme 9 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
362 (329min - 376max) MBit/s ∼56% +24%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
322 (162min - 386max) MBit/s ∼50% +10%
Motorola Moto G52
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
292 MBit/s ∼45%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
268 (133min - 280max) MBit/s ∼42% -8%
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340Tooltip
; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø283 (244-311)
; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø303 (224-341)
室内的地理定位
室内的地理定位
在户外的地理定位
在户外的地理定位

为了判断我们的测试设备在实践中的地理定位能力的精度,我们同时用Garmin Venu 2记录我们的轨迹,以便进行比较。卫星系统GPS(L1)、GLONASS、BeiDou和Galileo(E1)以及SBAS被用来确定我们的位置。

在我们长度为4公里(约2.49英里)的测试轨道上,与智能手表相比,我们的中档智能手机的偏差相当小。对GPS记录的详细观察显示,Moto G52在精确度方面与Garmin设备相似,这使得Moto智能手机成为普通导航任务的一个好选择。然而,Moto手机往往会偷工减料。

地理定位 Garmin Venu 2
地理定位 Garmin Venu 2
地理定位 摩托罗拉Moto G52
地理定位 摩托罗拉Moto G52

电话和通话质量 - 双卡双待的Moto G52

摩托罗拉Moto G52智能手机评测
摩托罗拉Moto G52智能手机评测

这款双卡手机支持两张nano SIM卡和一张附加存储卡。在安静的环境中,Moto G52的通话质量很好,免提电话可以在视频通话时进行清晰的沟通。即使在距离手机1米(约3.28英尺)的地方,我们的声音仍然清晰可闻。

摄像机 - 摩托罗拉智能手机的三摄像头

摩托罗拉Moto G52的人像模式
摩托罗拉Moto G52的人像模式
乘坐摩托罗拉Moto G52的Seflie
乘坐摩托罗拉Moto G52的Seflie

显示屏顶部小孔内的前置摄像头的分辨率为16MP。在日光下,自拍提供了良好的清晰度和体面的色彩表现。然而,用人像模式拍摄的前置摄像头照片往往看起来曝光过度,背景被烧毁。

在背面,摩托罗拉安装了一个三摄像头,有一个5000万像素的主摄像头和一个f/1.8光圈。三星S5KJN1,这也是由 Redmi Note 11,将四个像素分别组合成一个超级像素,捕捉更多的光线。这导致了1250万像素的照片,尽管一种特殊模式也允许用户利用全分辨率。

在日光下,Moto G52的照片对于一款中档手机来说效果不错,尽管曝光和清晰度可以更好。在这一点上,Moto G52 Redmi Note 11表现略好,色彩表现也略胜一筹。

虽然微距光学在日常使用中用途有限,但相对于300美元以下的价格范围,800万像素的超宽镜头以大视野和良好的质量而闪耀。也就是说,照片在靠近边缘的地方出现了扭曲,清晰度有待提高。

所有相机的视频记录都限制在全高清和30 FPS。在视频录制过程中,在主镜头和广角镜头之间进行切换是不可能的。

超广角
主摄像头
5倍变焦
8倍变焦(最大)
摩托罗拉Moto G52智能手机评测
摩托罗拉Moto G52智能手机评测
摩托罗拉Moto G52智能手机评测
摩托罗拉Moto G52智能手机评测

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

HauptkameraHauptkameraLow LightWeitwinkel
click to load images

我们在受控的照明条件下,用ColorChecker护照分析了50-MP光学器件与参考色之间的色彩准确性。除了典型的智能手机增亮外,Moto G52还显示出相当大的ColorChecker偏差。然而,考虑到价格,在色彩准确性方面的异常值(>15)仍然是可以接受的。

ColorChecker
17 ∆E
14.4 ∆E
18.2 ∆E
15.8 ∆E
17.4 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
20 ∆E
15.3 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
12.4 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
14.2 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
5 ∆E
15.3 ∆E
15.4 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Motorola Moto G52: 12.23 ∆E min: 3.58 - max: 20.01 ∆E
ColorChecker
28.9 ∆E
50.1 ∆E
37.2 ∆E
35.4 ∆E
40.6 ∆E
57.1 ∆E
50.2 ∆E
31.8 ∆E
36 ∆E
25.5 ∆E
59.3 ∆E
58.9 ∆E
27.7 ∆E
46 ∆E
32.4 ∆E
68.4 ∆E
37 ∆E
40.5 ∆E
70.4 ∆E
66.4 ∆E
49.1 ∆E
35.6 ∆E
23.5 ∆E
13.6 ∆E
ColorChecker Motorola Moto G52: 42.57 ∆E min: 13.55 - max: 70.43 ∆E

配件和保修 - 摩托罗拉手机带充电器

摩托罗拉Moto G52配备了一个充电器。
摩托罗拉Moto G52配备了一个充电器。

Moto G52的包装包括一个模块化的33瓦充电器,一条数据/充电线,一个盖子,一个SIM卡针,以及一份包括保修信息的快速入门指南。

标准的12个月保修期适用。Moto G52有一个可选的延长保修期,涵盖另外12个月的机械故障。可选的事故保护被称为Moto Care(99美元,为期2年),包括针对水和物理损坏的额外保护。

输入设备和操作 - 带有FaceUnlock的Moto G52

虽然电源键上的集成指纹传感器能可靠地解锁Moto G52,但它的速度并不快。从待机状态唤醒显示屏也是一件有些迟缓的事情。通过前置摄像头的二维面部识别FaceUnlock在日常使用中运行良好,尽管它不是很安全。

6.6英寸OLED显示屏上的输入被精确地执行,一直到触摸屏的角落里。由于90赫兹的高刷新率,动画和滚动的网页在大多数情况下看起来都很流畅。

摩托罗拉Moto G52智能手机评测
摩托罗拉Moto G52智能手机评测
摩托罗拉Moto G52智能手机评测

显示屏 - 采用OLED面板的Moto手机

子像素阵列
子像素阵列

Moto G52采用6.6英寸AMOLED显示屏,分辨率为2400x1080像素,刷新率为60或90赫兹。另外,用户也可以让手机在这两个刷新率之间自动切换。

在亮度和照度方面,摩托罗拉手机属于优秀的范围。 Redmi Note 11.在显示纯白色图像时,我们测得的峰值为664尼特。在APL50测试中,在亮区和暗区均匀分布的情况下,我们在屏幕中心测量到几乎相同的651尼特。这使得HDR10面板成为播放高动态范围的内容的次优选择。

由于底层的OLED技术,Moto手机受到了屏幕闪烁的影响。虽然我们检测到约90赫兹的低PWM频率,但周期至少是一致的。不管怎么说,这可能会影响敏感的用户,幸好他们可以从设置菜单中启用可选的直流调光模式(防闪烁)。

633
cd/m²
648
cd/m²
659
cd/m²
635
cd/m²
655
cd/m²
664
cd/m²
633
cd/m²
651
cd/m²
661
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 664 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 648.8 cd/m² Minimum: 2 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 95 %
Center on Battery: 655 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.1 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.3
ΔE Greyscale 1.7 | 0.64-98 Ø5.6
94.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.212
Motorola Moto G52
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.60
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
OLED, 2400x1080, 6.43
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
TFT-LCD, 2400x1080, 6.60
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Super AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.40
realme 9 5G
IPS, 2412x1080, 6.60
Screen
9%
-87%
-2%
-133%
Brightness middle
655
702
7%
504
-23%
693
6%
589
-10%
Brightness
649
701
8%
499
-23%
695
7%
561
-14%
Brightness Distribution
95
98
3%
91
-4%
98
3%
90
-5%
Black Level *
0.72
0.5
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.1
1
9%
3.3
-200%
1.3
-18%
4.33
-294%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
2.58
2.3
11%
6
-133%
3.5
-36%
8.39
-225%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.7
1.4
18%
4.1
-141%
1.3
24%
5.9
-247%
Gamma
2.212 99%
2.2 100%
2.28 96%
2.14 103%
2.063 107%
CCT
6557 99%
6520 100%
7041 92%
6530 100%
8021 81%
Contrast
700
1178

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 90.1 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 90.1 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 90.1 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 19959 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

PWM闪动
PWM闪动
0%的亮度
0%的亮度
25%的亮度
25%的亮度
50%的亮度
50%的亮度
75%的亮度
75%的亮度
100%的亮度
100%的亮度

在固定的变焦水平和不同的亮度设置下进行测量

虽然Moto手机在色彩平衡方面没有提供太多的定制,但用户至少可以在两个不同的配置文件中进行选择。在这两种情况下,色温可以调整,而饱和度等个别参数不能调整。

我们用CalMAN软件和分光光度计进行的测试表明,AMOLED面板非常准确,色彩偏差很低(配置文件:自然)。由于OLED技术允许个别像素完全关闭,显示 "绝对 "黑色是可能的,而且对比度(理论上)接近无限大。

色彩准确性(目标色彩空间:sRGB,配置文件:自然)。
色彩准确性(目标色彩空间:sRGB,配置文件:自然)。
色彩空间(目标色彩空间:AdobeRGB,配置文件:自然)。
色彩空间(目标色彩空间:AdobeRGB,配置文件:自然)。
色彩空间(目标色彩空间:P3,配置文件:自然)。
色彩空间(目标色彩空间:P3,配置文件:自然)。
色彩空间(目标色彩空间:sRGB,配置文件:自然)。
色彩空间(目标色彩空间:sRGB,配置文件:自然)。
灰度(目标色彩空间:sRGB,配置文件:自然)。
灰度(目标色彩空间:sRGB,配置文件:自然)。
色彩饱和度(目标色彩空间:sRGB,轮廓:自然)。
色彩饱和度(目标色彩空间:sRGB,轮廓:自然)。

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
12 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6 ms rise
↘ 6 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.4 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 20 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (23.1 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
13 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 7 ms rise
↘ 6 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.25 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 15 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (36.5 ms).

由于高亮度,Moto G52非常适合日常户外使用。尽管高对比度仍然允许用户在阳光直射下阅读显示屏,而且屏幕上会出现眩光,但用户不应该期望有像S22 Ultra那样的亮度储备。 Galaxy S22 Ultra.

AMOLED面板的可视角度非常好,只有在从极端角度观看时,感知的亮度才会下降。

摩托罗拉Moto G52智能手机评测
摩托罗拉Moto G52智能手机评测
摩托罗拉Moto G52智能手机评测

性能 - 采用高通SoC的摩托罗拉手机

摩托G52使用了一个 高通Snapdragon 680.这款6纳米的SoC有四个Cortex-A73内核(2.4GHz)和四个Cortex-A53内核(1.8GHz)。图形单元 Adreno 610补充了这个处理器。在日常使用中,使用这款中档手机在大多数情况下是一种流畅的体验,尽管轻微的延迟发生得有些频繁。

在我们的基准测试套件中,Moto手机远远落后于其他手机。 Redmi Note 11.相较于 三星Galaxy A33 5G,Geekbench的单核分数尤其明显较低。同样,在我们的比较中,其他设备在PCMark和浏览器测试中表现明显更好。

Geekbench 5.4
Single-Core
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
737 Points ∼100% +95%
realme 9 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
692 Points ∼94% +83%
Average of class Smartphone
  (58 - 1755, n=272, last 2 years)
683 Points ∼93% +81%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
598 Points ∼81% +58%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
384 Points ∼52% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
  (374 - 384, n=8)
379 Points ∼51% 0%
Motorola Moto G52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
378 Points ∼51%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (248 - 4914, n=272, last 2 years)
2221 Points ∼100% +41%
realme 9 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
1914 Points ∼86% +22%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
1905 Points ∼86% +21%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
1809 Points ∼81% +15%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
1738 Points ∼78% +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
  (1557 - 1738, n=8)
1625 Points ∼73% +3%
Motorola Moto G52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
1573 Points ∼71%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (111952 - 1119358, n=126, last 2 years)
556641 Points ∼100% +168%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
398969 Points ∼72% +92%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
353908 Points ∼64% +70%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
252044 Points ∼45% +21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
  (207780 - 252044, n=3)
232732 Points ∼42% +12%
Motorola Moto G52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
207780 Points ∼37%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
11077 Points ∼100% +65%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4436 - 18567, n=172, last 2 years)
10218 Points ∼92% +52%
realme 9 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
9776 Points ∼88% +45%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
9402 Points ∼85% +40%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
7694 Points ∼69% +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
  (5884 - 8730, n=8)
7028 Points ∼63% +4%
Motorola Moto G52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
6728 Points ∼61%
CrossMark - Overall
Average of class Smartphone
  (226 - 1169, n=67, last 2 years)
737 Points ∼100% +125%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
388 Points ∼53% +19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
  (325 - 413, n=4)
363 Points ∼49% +11%
Motorola Moto G52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
327 Points ∼44%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average of class Smartphone
  (1223 - 8753, n=179, last 2 years)
4331 Points ∼100% +68%
realme 9 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3535 Points ∼82% +37%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
3477 Points ∼80% +35%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
3268 Points ∼75% +27%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
2738 Points ∼63% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
  (2564 - 2738, n=4)
2613 Points ∼60% +2%
Motorola Moto G52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
2573 Points ∼59%
System
Average of class Smartphone
  (2083 - 19657, n=179, last 2 years)
7678 Points ∼100% +34%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
7184 Points ∼94% +25%
realme 9 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
6969 Points ∼91% +21%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
6361 Points ∼83% +11%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
5794 Points ∼75% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
  (5667 - 5852, n=4)
5763 Points ∼75% 0%
Motorola Moto G52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
5739 Points ∼75%
Memory
Average of class Smartphone
  (670 - 9044, n=179, last 2 years)
4956 Points ∼100% +42%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
4589 Points ∼93% +32%
realme 9 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
4366 Points ∼88% +25%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
3829 Points ∼77% +10%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
3824 Points ∼77% +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
  (3424 - 3824, n=4)
3600 Points ∼73% +3%
Motorola Moto G52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
3483 Points ∼70%
Graphics
Average of class Smartphone
  (697 - 26660, n=179, last 2 years)
7712 Points ∼100% +253%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
5104 Points ∼66% +134%
realme 9 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
4413 Points ∼57% +102%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2929 Points ∼38% +34%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
2183 Points ∼28% 0%
Motorola Moto G52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
2182 Points ∼28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
  (2123 - 2183, n=4)
2167 Points ∼28% -1%
Web
Average of class Smartphone
  (718 - 2392, n=179, last 2 years)
1388 Points ∼100% +51%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
1334 Points ∼96% +45%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
1199 Points ∼86% +31%
realme 9 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
1163 Points ∼84% +27%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
1041 Points ∼75% +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
  (917 - 1199, n=4)
1027 Points ∼74% +12%
Motorola Moto G52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
917 Points ∼66%
AImark - Score v2.x
Average of class Smartphone
  (4293 - 286905, n=146, last 2 years)
55254 Points ∼100% +1037%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
9008 Points ∼16% +85%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
4995 Points ∼9% +3%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
4926 Points ∼9% +1%
Motorola Moto G52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
4859 Points ∼9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
  (4320 - 4995, n=4)
4757 Points ∼9% -2%

在图形基准测试中,Moto G52的表现更好,它和其他同类产品持平。 Redmi Note 11.配备了 Dimensity 810Exynos 1280,分别是 Poco M4 ProGalaxy A33 5G的速度有时是两倍,但是。与强大的中端竞争对手相比,的 骁龙680是不合格的。

3DMark
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
617 Points ∼100% +406%
realme 9 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
352 Points ∼57% +189%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
348 Points ∼56% +185%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
124 Points ∼20% +2%
Motorola Moto G52
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
122 Points ∼20%
Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
632 Points ∼100% +450%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
360 Points ∼57% +213%
realme 9 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
356 Points ∼56% +210%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
127 Points ∼20% +10%
Motorola Moto G52
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
115 Points ∼18%
Wild Life Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2238 Points ∼100% +383%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1210 Points ∼54% +161%
realme 9 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1197 Points ∼53% +159%
Motorola Moto G52
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
463 Points ∼21%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
435 Points ∼19% -6%
Wild Life Score
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2262 Points ∼100% +395%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1235 Points ∼55% +170%
realme 9 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1197 Points ∼53% +162%
Motorola Moto G52
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
457 Points ∼20%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
447 Points ∼20% -2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics
realme 9 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2883 Points ∼100% +15%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2882 Points ∼100% +15%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2594 Points ∼90% +3%
Motorola Moto G52
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2511 Points ∼87%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2375 Points ∼82% -5%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3911 Points ∼100% +239%
realme 9 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2749 Points ∼70% +138%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2396 Points ∼61% +108%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1155 Points ∼30% 0%
Motorola Moto G52
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1153 Points ∼29%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3514 Points ∼100% +171%
realme 9 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2778 Points ∼79% +114%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2489 Points ∼71% +92%
Motorola Moto G52
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1299 Points ∼37%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1253 Points ∼36% -4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3804 Points ∼100% +42%
realme 9 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3462 Points ∼91% +29%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3035 Points ∼80% +14%
Motorola Moto G52
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2674 Points ∼70%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2573 Points ∼68% -4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3922 Points ∼100% +216%
realme 9 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3008 Points ∼77% +142%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2570 Points ∼66% +107%
Motorola Moto G52
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1242 Points ∼32%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1199 Points ∼31% -3%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3683 Points ∼100% +169%
realme 9 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3098 Points ∼84% +127%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2770 Points ∼75% +103%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1372 Points ∼37% 0%
Motorola Moto G52
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1367 Points ∼37%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3553 Points ∼100% +34%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2833 Points ∼80% +7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2654 Points ∼75% 0%
Motorola Moto G52
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2644 Points ∼74%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5216 Points ∼100% +152%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3846 Points ∼74% +86%
Motorola Moto G52
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2067 Points ∼40%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1995 Points ∼38% -3%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4395 Points ∼100% +105%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3777 Points ∼86% +76%
Motorola Moto G52
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2145 Points ∼49%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2113 Points ∼48% -1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3592 Points ∼100% +165%
realme 9 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2949 Points ∼82% +117%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2714 Points ∼76% +100%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1365 Points ∼38% +1%
Motorola Moto G52
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1357 Points ∼38%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3885 Points ∼100% +237%
realme 9 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2831 Points ∼73% +145%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2546 Points ∼66% +121%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1188 Points ∼31% +3%
Motorola Moto G52
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1154 Points ∼30%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3529 Points ∼100% +29%
realme 9 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3455 Points ∼98% +26%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2842 Points ∼81% +4%
Motorola Moto G52
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2738 Points ∼78%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2683 Points ∼76% -2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4630 Points ∼100% +111%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3965 Points ∼86% +81%
Motorola Moto G52
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2190 Points ∼47%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2085 Points ∼45% -5%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5418 Points ∼100% +158%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4014 Points ∼74% +92%
Motorola Moto G52
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2096 Points ∼39%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1931 Points ∼36% -8%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3801 Points ∼100% +41%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3069 Points ∼81% +14%
Motorola Moto G52
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2696 Points ∼71%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2589 Points ∼68% -4%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
78 fps ∼100% +117%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
56 fps ∼72% +56%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
37 fps ∼47% +3%
Motorola Moto G52
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
36 fps ∼46%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
91 fps ∼100% +122%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
66 fps ∼73% +61%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
42 fps ∼46% +2%
Motorola Moto G52
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
41 fps ∼45%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
59 fps ∼100% +195%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
36 fps ∼61% +80%
Motorola Moto G52
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
20 fps ∼34%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
17 fps ∼29% -15%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
60 fps ∼100% +173%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
40 fps ∼67% +82%
Motorola Moto G52
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
22 fps ∼37%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
20 fps ∼33% -9%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
37 fps ∼100% +185%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
23 fps ∼62% +77%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
13 fps ∼35% 0%
Motorola Moto G52
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
13 fps ∼35%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
38 fps ∼100% +153%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
26 fps ∼68% +73%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
16 fps ∼42% +7%
Motorola Moto G52
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
15 fps ∼39%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
21 fps ∼100% +184%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
13 fps ∼62% +76%
Motorola Moto G52
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
7.4 fps ∼35%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
7.3 fps ∼35% -1%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
23 fps ∼100% +161%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
16 fps ∼70% +82%
Motorola Moto G52
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
8.8 fps ∼38%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
8.6 fps ∼37% -2%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
16 fps ∼100% +202%
realme 9 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
12 fps ∼75% +126%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
9.3 fps ∼58% +75%
Motorola Moto G52
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
5.3 fps ∼33%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5 fps ∼31% -6%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
10 fps ∼100% +614%
realme 9 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
7.8 fps ∼78% +457%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
6.2 fps ∼62% +343%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3.2 fps ∼32% +129%
Motorola Moto G52
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1.4 fps ∼14%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
25 fps ∼100% +163%
realme 9 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
19 fps ∼76% +100%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
15 fps ∼60% +58%
Motorola Moto G52
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
9.5 fps ∼38%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
8.8 fps ∼35% -7%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
26 fps ∼100% +410%
realme 9 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
21 fps ∼81% +312%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
17 fps ∼65% +233%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
9.8 fps ∼38% +92%
Motorola Moto G52
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
5.1 fps ∼20%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G (Chrome)
66.011 Points ∼100% +62%
Average of class Smartphone (12.4 - 182.6, n=179, last 2 years)
64.4 Points ∼98% +58%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G (Chrome 96)
43.83 Points ∼66% +8%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 (Chrome 101)
43.525 Points ∼66% +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (40.7 - 43.5, n=4)
42 Points ∼64% +3%
Motorola Moto G52 (Chrome 103)
40.743 Points ∼62%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (9 - 244, n=166, last 2 years)
62.2 runs/min ∼100% +66%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G (Chrome)
47.99 runs/min ∼77% +28%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G (Chrome 96)
39.8 runs/min ∼64% +6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 (Chrome 101)
39.64 runs/min ∼64% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (37.5 - 40.1, n=4)
38.7 runs/min ∼62% +3%
Motorola Moto G52 (Chrome 103)
37.48 runs/min ∼60%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Average of class Smartphone (20 - 265, n=187, last 2 years)
94.2 Points ∼100% +57%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G (Chrome 102.0.5005.99)
82 Points ∼87% +37%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 (Chrome 101)
67 Points ∼71% +12%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G (Chrome 96)
62 Points ∼66% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (59 - 67, n=3)
62 Points ∼66% +3%
Motorola Moto G52 (Chrome 103)
60 Points ∼64%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G (Chrome 102.0.5005.99)
24521 Points ∼100% +98%
Average of class Smartphone (3526 - 65969, n=194, last 2 years)
24228 Points ∼99% +96%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G (Chrome 96)
19010 Points ∼78% +53%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 (Chrome 101)
13056 Points ∼53% +5%
Motorola Moto G52 (Chrome 103)
12386 Points ∼51%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (10729 - 13141, n=5)
12335 Points ∼50% 0%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (3183 - 3341, n=3)
3253 ms * ∼100% -2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 (Chrome 101)
3234.1 ms * ∼99% -2%
Motorola Moto G52 (Chrome 103)
3183.3 ms * ∼98%
Average of class Smartphone (414 - 15230, n=192, last 2 years)
3023 ms * ∼93% +5%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G (Chrome 96)
2410 ms * ∼74% +24%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G (Chrome)
1856.6 ms * ∼57% +42%

* ... smaller is better

Moto G52的UFS存储提供中等的读写速度,小数据块的速度特别慢。

Motorola Moto G52Xiaomi Redmi Note 11Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5GSamsung Galaxy A33 5Grealme 9 5GAverage 128 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
17%
12%
20%
-45%
-8%
18%
Sequential Read 256KB
893.44
895.34
0%
964
8%
512.84
-43%
511
-43%
775 ?(427 - 1011, n=102)
-13%
946 ?(45.6 - 2037, n=265, last 2 years)
6%
Sequential Write 256KB
503.56
519.23
3%
471
-6%
487.66
-3%
120.6
-76%
290 ?(13.6 - 719, n=102)
-42%
501 ?(11.9 - 1485, n=265, last 2 years)
-1%
Random Read 4KB
98.99
172.95
75%
148.8
50%
216.48
119%
88.5
-11%
150.4 ?(92.6 - 239, n=102)
52%
171.3 ?(13.5 - 345, n=265, last 2 years)
73%
Random Write 4KB
182.92
163.29
-11%
171.8
-6%
194.12
6%
95.4
-48%
129.8 ?(18.2 - 290, n=102)
-29%
167.7 ?(30.3 - 475, n=266, last 2 years)
-8%

游戏--Moto G52仅达到30 FPS

我们使用GameBench应用程序来仔细看看Moto G52的游戏性能。为了能够运行要求更高的游戏,Motorla手机集成了一个 Adreno 610以获得足够的图形性能,尽管安装的GPU是一个入门级单元。

因此,《PUBG Mobile》只能在低细节下播放,而不能选择中等细节设置(高清)。在最低的细节设置下,Moto G52可以管理大约30 FPS,而更好的图形会导致帧率下降到25 FPS。

理论上支持144FPS的竞技场射击游戏Armajet运行平稳,但Moto手机再次被限制在30FPS。平均而言,低波动导致每秒30帧的稳定帧率。

摩托罗拉Moto G52智能手机评测
摩托罗拉Moto G52智能手机评测
051015202530Tooltip
; Armajet: Ø29.9 (27-31)
; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø29.7 (23-31)
; PUBG Mobile; Balanced: Ø24.9 (24-26)

排放 - 摩托罗拉手机变暖

温度

摩托G52的GFXBench
摩托G52的GFXBench

在负载下,Moto手机的表面热量发展并不均匀。我们记录的非关键最高温度为42.8°C(110.84°F),Moto G52的内部热量发展并没有导致高通SoC的节流。

GFXBench和Wild Life的压力测试说明,在负载增加的情况下,性能只是略有下降。

Max. Load
 40.8 °C36.7 °C33.7 °C 
 40 °C36 °C34.4 °C 
 39.8 °C36.3 °C34.1 °C 
Maximum: 40.8 °C
Average: 36.9 °C
33.5 °C36.4 °C42.8 °C
34 °C36.3 °C42.8 °C
34.4 °C37.3 °C42 °C
Maximum: 42.8 °C
Average: 37.7 °C
Power Supply (max.)  41.3 °C | Room Temperature 21.6 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.9 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.8 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22 to 52.9 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.8 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.9 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark - Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Motorola Moto G52
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
99.7 (2.68min) % ∼100%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.6 (7.36min) % ∼100% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.5 (13.4min) % ∼100% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.1 (2.66min) % ∼99% -1%
012345678910111213Tooltip
Motorola Moto G52 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø2.68 (2.68-2.68)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø2.68 (2.66-2.69)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø7.38 (7.36-7.39)
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø13.5 (13.4-13.5)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø7.25 (7.25-7.25)
摩托罗拉Moto G52智能手机评测
摩托罗拉Moto G52智能手机评测

发言人

Moto G52使用了双扬声器设置,这不仅创造了立体声效果,而且还确保了足够的最大音量。相对于它的价格类别,声音很好。我们对Moto手机的测量结果显示,中音的频率响应图是线性的,高音则略有下降。其实没有任何低音。

使用无线或有线耳机的音频体验也很愉快。Moto G52的3.5毫米耳机插孔可以让音乐播放有更多低音。除了耳机插孔,蓝牙5.0包括SBC、AAC、aptX HD和aptX Adaptive以及LDAC和LHDC编解码。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.639.22534.8343132.631.94037.132.55042.836.16332.727.88022.922.810020.227.212517.93216015.938.82001240250114231513.450.14001159.650012.669.163012.570.280011.869.8100011.474.7125011.573.3160010.574.520009.973.3250010.673.4315011.973.8400012.874.1500013.973.9630014.470800015.268.9100001669.71250015.964.11600016.662.8SPL25.384.6N0.660.5median 12.6median 69.7Delta211.437.436.62828.232.625.427.7283437.82725.423.625.922.328.617.730.516.145.312.845.213.150.71257.3960.81168.410.771.110.374.410.973.712.176.411.878.61278.911.878.411.977.712.978.713.379.713.47813.572.713.670.714.868.614.161.224.6890.676.6median 12.8median 71.11.112.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMotorola Moto G52Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Motorola Moto G52 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 13% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 77% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 23%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 41% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 19% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 23%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 46% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

电池寿命 - 配备5000毫安时的摩托罗拉手机

能源消耗

这款moto手机的电池容量为5000 mAh。凭借制造商自己的快速充电技术,在30瓦特的条件下为手机完全充电只需要大约80分钟。方便的是,这款中档智能手机附带了一个合适的充电器。

Moto G52的整体能耗并无异常。在负载情况下,它的耗电量要比 Redmi Note 11和它的 骁龙680.

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0 / 0.2 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.8 / 1.1 / 1.5 Watt
Load midlight 2.9 / 5 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Motorola Moto G52
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
5000 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-23%
-24%
-33%
-12%
-37%
Idle Minimum *
0.8
1.06
-33%
0.51
36%
0.88
-10%
0.953 ?(0.8 - 1.06, n=3)
-19%
0.897 ?(0.12 - 2.5, n=202, last 2 years)
-12%
Idle Average *
1.1
1.93
-75%
1.96
-78%
1.47
-34%
1.51 ?(1.1 - 1.93, n=3)
-37%
1.652 ?(0.65 - 3.6, n=202, last 2 years)
-50%
Idle Maximum *
1.5
1.96
-31%
2.01
-34%
1.52
-1%
1.82 ?(1.5 - 2, n=3)
-21%
1.869 ?(0.69 - 3.7, n=202, last 2 years)
-25%
Load Average *
2.9
2.87
1%
3.86
-33%
5.38
-86%
2.79 ?(2.6 - 2.9, n=3)
4%
4.42 ?(2.1 - 7.74, n=202, last 2 years)
-52%
Load Maximum *
5
3.85
23%
5.62
-12%
6.62
-32%
4.45 ?(3.85 - 5, n=3)
11%
7.27 ?(3.56 - 11.9, n=202, last 2 years)
-45%

* ... smaller is better

Consumption: Geekbench (150 nits)

0123456Tooltip
Motorola Moto G52 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G: Ø3.35 (1.451-6.19)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G: Ø3.03 (1.109-6.23)

Consumption: GFXBench (150 nits)

012345Tooltip
Motorola Moto G52 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø2.75 (1.515-3.9)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø2.88 (2.54-5.23)
Motorola Moto G52 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G; Idle 1min: Ø1.005 (0.88-1.296)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G; Idle 1min: Ø1.302 (1.117-1.614)

电池寿命

在我们的实际电池测试中,我们在调整后的150尼特的显示亮度下进行测试,以使结果易于比较,Moto G52在90赫兹的固定刷新率下具有出色的电池寿命。在我们的Wi-Fi测试中,Moto手机达到了18.5小时的出色运行时间,在禁用Wi-Fi模块的情况下,在我们的视频循环测试中又持续了3小时。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
36h 23min
WiFi Websurfing
18h 22min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
21h 14min
Load (maximum brightness)
6h 38min
Motorola Moto G52
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
5000 mAh
realme 9 5G
5000 mAh
Battery Runtime
-10%
-7%
-15%
-7%
Reader / Idle
2183
2098
-4%
2722
25%
2041
-7%
H.264
1274
1076
-16%
1008
-21%
1146
-10%
WiFi v1.3
1102
842
-24%
966
-12%
771
-30%
1029
-7%
Load
398
409
3%
322
-19%
347
-13%

Pros

+ 电池寿命长
+ 包括快速充电器
+ 良好的90-Hz OLED面板
+ 立体声
+ 良好的建造质量,包括IP认证
+ 三合一插槽

Cons

- 没有5G
- 缓慢的SoC
- 游戏性能慢

对摩托罗拉Moto G52的评判

在审查中。摩托罗拉Moto G52。测试设备由摩托罗拉德国公司提供。
在审查中。摩托罗拉Moto G52。测试设备由摩托罗拉德国公司提供。

通过Moto G52,摩托罗拉创造了一个伟大而全面的中档智能手机。作为一款廉价的中端智能手机,其广泛的功能和出色的显示质量都值得一提。Moto G52还提供了很好的制造质量,甚至还获得了IP认证,尽管对于295美元来说,我们更喜欢玻璃背面的优质触感。如果你愿意部分放弃摩托罗拉手机的出色电池寿命,那么 Redmi Note 11是一个可行的替代方案,甚至是更便宜的中档手机,具有类似的功能,更好的主摄像头,以及略微更亮的OLED面板。

如果你对快速的5G标准没有需求,Moto G52是一款神奇的中档手机,价格相当低。

考虑到Moto G52的价格,唯一真正的缺点是缺乏5G支持和相机质量。话虽如此,这款手机的性能 骁龙680与这个价格范围内的大多数手机相比也较低,如 Poco M4 Pro 例如,Poco M4 Pro能够使我们测试设备的一些基准分数翻倍。对于喜欢玩奇特的Android 游戏的用户来说,稍贵的 Galaxy A33 5G是一个更好的选择。

价格和可用性

Motorola Moto G52 - 07/03/2022 v7
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis
84%
Keyboard
69 / 75 → 91%
Pointing Device
89%
Connectivity
50 / 70 → 71%
Weight
91%
Battery
92%
Display
91%
Games Performance
15 / 64 → 23%
Application Performance
69 / 86 → 80%
Temperature
89%
Noise
100%
Audio
82 / 90 → 91%
Camera
59%
Average
75%
81%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 摩托罗拉Moto G52智能手机评测--经济实惠的90Hz OLED手机,带立体声和50MP
Marcus Herbrich, 2022-07-16 (Update: 2022-07-16)