结论 - 摩托罗拉 Moto G57 电源
摩托罗拉 Moto G57 Power 的长电池续航能力给人留下了深刻印象，它在很大程度上取得了成功。然而，由于竞争对手的迎头赶上，这项功能已不再像以前那样与众不同。
尽管如此，这款手机仍然值得一看。它的重量保持在合理的范围内，机身既美观又坚固，显示屏明亮且无 PWM 闪烁。
尽管性能空间有限，但整体性能稳定。即使长时间使用，SoC 也不会出现节流现象，这是值得肯定的一点。
扬声器和摄像头在同价位机型中也算够用，但并没有特别突出的地方。
在我们的 Wi-Fi 测试中，这款手机的续航时间超过了 20 小时。虽然这是一个很好的结果，但小米红米 15 5G 的续航时间要稍长一些。因此，摩托罗拉可能需要在未来几代产品中更加努力，以更好地区分其 Power 机型。
Moto G57 Power 的最大弱点是支持更新的时间较短。
Pros
Cons
价格和供应情况
Moto G57 Power 在欧洲的零售商中尚未广泛上市。不过，在线零售商 Alza目前该智能手机的售价低于 300 欧元。摩托罗拉直接出售的价格略低。.
相比之下，Amazon.de目前只列出了该智能手机的保护套。在撰写本文时，摩托罗拉 Moto G57 Power 尚未在美国正式发售。
- Motorola Moto G Power - 2026 | Unlocked | Made for US 8/128GB | 50MP Camera | Pantone Evenng Blue | Universal Unlocked, AI Camera System, Military Grade, Ram Boost
- Silsewip [2pcs] Hydrogel Screen Protector for Motorola Moto G57 Power/Moto G57, Ultra-Thin, High Sensitivity Flexible TPU Flim Perfect for Daily Use (Non-tempered glass)
- Fast Charger Cord USB C Wall Charger 30W for Moto G 2026,G Play 2026,G Power 2025,G Stylus 5G 2025,Razr+ 2025,Edge 70,G57 Power,Razr 60 Ultra,Android Phone Charger Block 6FT Type C to C Charging Cable
规格
表壳和功能 - 仿皮革表面处理和 eSIM 支持
Moto G57 Power 秉承了摩托罗拉当前的设计语言，机身背面采用了仿皮革纹理，触感舒适。摄像头模块通过材料上的柔和轮廓自然地从背面流出，使手机看起来比其价格可能暗示的更加高档。机身本身非常坚固，没有吱吱作响或不必要的弯曲。
手机提供蓝绿色、绿松石色和粉红色三种颜色。IP64 防护等级可防止灰尘进入和飞溅。
存储容量固定为 256 GB，搭配 8 GB 或 12 GB 内存；我们测试的是高内存配置。遗憾的是，没有通过 microSD 扩展存储的选项。
USB-C 端口仅支持 USB-2.0 速度，蓝牙 5.1 也已超过最新规格，但摩托罗拉在 Nano-SIM 卡插槽的同时还提供了 3.5 毫米耳机插孔和 eSIM 支持。
通信和操作 - 具有稳定 Wi-Fi 功能的 Moto 手机
Wi-Fi 5 是 Moto G57 Power 支持的最快无线标准。这使它与其他同类产品保持一致，但该设备的传输速率非常稳定，约为 300 至 350 Mbit/s。
Moto G57 Power 支持多种 4G 和 5G 频段，因此可以在旅行时使用智能手机进行移动上网。
触摸屏的采样率高达 120 Hz，操作起来非常流畅，在我们的测试中也没有出现掉线现象。
指纹传感器集成在右侧的待机键上。经过简单的设置后，它能非常可靠地识别指纹，并几乎立即解锁手机。人脸识别功能也可通过前置摄像头可靠地进行识别。
| Networking | |
| Motorola Moto G57 Power | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Motorola Moto G56 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A26 5G | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Average of class Smartphone | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
软件和可持续性 - 摩托罗拉手机多久会收到更新？
Android 16 预装。摩托罗拉只对Android 进行了微小的改动，并为其自身功能补充了一些应用程序。
制造商已确认将操作系统升级到Android 17，但之后的支持仍不明确。摩托罗拉承诺在上市后两年半内提供安全更新，直至 2028 年 6 月。
关于该设备的可持续发展资质，我们所知甚少。至少包装是无塑料的。
摄像头 - 5000 万像素主摄像头能做什么？
与前代产品相比，该机在摄像头方面略有改进。5000 万像素的主摄像头现在可以 30 帧/秒的速度录制高达 1440p 的视频。此外，该机还配备了专门的超广角摄像头，可拍摄出不错的风景照片，但由于细节有限，图像不宜放大太多。
主摄像头本身可拍摄出相当不错的照片，但清晰度不够，在光线稍弱的情况下，图像很快就会出现颗粒感。在对比度较高的弱光场景中，即使非常暗的区域几乎看不到细节，但色彩呈现还是令人满意的。
前置摄像头的分辨率为 800 万像素。虽然亮度不够完美，但它的动态效果还算不错，自拍效果总体上还可以。
Image comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Prim. camera - plantPrim. camera - streetPrim. camera - low lightWide-angle camera
显示屏 - 无 PWM 闪烁的摩托罗拉
在我们的分光光度计测量中，IPS 显示屏被证明非常明亮。不过，它的峰值亮度终究不足以实现真正令人信服的 HDR 再现。即便如此，Moto G57 Power 仍然非常适合户外使用。
色彩还原准确，肉眼看不到明显的偏色。我们也没有发现任何 PWM 闪烁。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 96 %
Center on Battery: 922 cd/m²
Contrast: 1618:1 (Black: 0.57 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 2.19 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.76}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 2.3 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
99.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.214
CCT: 6422 K
| Motorola Moto G57 Power IPS, 2400x1080, 6.7" | Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G IPS, 2340x1080, 6.9" | Motorola Moto G56 IPS, 2400x1080, 6.7" | Samsung Galaxy A26 5G Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.7" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -37% | -32% | -44% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 922 | 692 -25% | 853 -7% | 735 -20% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 899 | 665 -26% | 793 -12% | 731 -19% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 96 | 93 -3% | 89 -7% | 99 3% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.57 | 0.38 33% | 0.54 5% | |
| Contrast (:1) | 1618 | 1821 13% | 1580 -2% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.19 | 4.18 -91% | 4.21 -92% | 3.8 -74% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.19 | 6.55 -105% | 6.69 -110% | 5.8 -82% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.3 | 4.4 -91% | 3 -30% | 4 -74% |
| Gamma | 2.214 99% | 2.286 96% | 2.175 101% | 1.98 111% |
| CCT | 6422 101% | 7530 86% | 6750 96% | 6628 98% |
* ... smaller is better
| Display / APL18 Peak Brightness | |
| Samsung Galaxy A26 5G | |
| Motorola Moto G57 Power | |
| Display / HDR Peak Brightness | |
| Samsung Galaxy A26 5G | |
| Motorola Moto G57 Power | |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8082 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 20 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 9.3 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 10.7 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 43 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.1 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 34.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 19.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 15.1 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 48 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (31.5 ms). | ||
性能、排放和电池续航时间 - Moto 手机续航时间长
高通 高通骁龙 6s 第 4 代系统芯片。就性能而言，它达到了同类产品的水平，系统运行一般比较流畅。不过，对于要求较高的应用来说，可用的余地不大。
UFS 2.2 存储系统性能强劲，可确保较短的加载时间。
在持续负载情况下，机箱会明显发热，但这并不严重。3DMark 压力测试也显示，SoC 的节流非常小。
底部扬声器由听筒支持，可发出立体声。最大音量一般，音质总体不错，但有些偏高音。外接音频设备可通过 3.5 毫米插孔或蓝牙连接，支持多种蓝牙音频编解码器。
7,000 毫安时的大容量电池无疑是 Moto G57 Power 的亮点之一。在我们的 Wi-Fi 测试中，它的续航时间远远超过了 20 小时。尽管如此，小米和其他厂商的中端智能手机也采用了这种尺寸的电池，有时续航时间会稍长一些。得益于 30 瓦的充电功率，电池可在 1 小时 45 分钟内充满。
| Motorola Moto G57 Power | Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G | Motorola Moto G56 | Samsung Galaxy A26 5G | Average 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -37% | -3% | -52% | -9% | 75% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s) | 936.8 | 525.5 -44% | 1013.35 8% | 528.54 -44% | 909 ? -3% | 2173 ? 132% |
| Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s) | 832.2 | 496.5 -40% | 859.11 3% | 251.43 -70% | 735 ? -12% | 1860 ? 124% |
| Random Read 4KB (MB/s) | 263.3 | 139.4 -47% | 230.68 -12% | 219.57 -17% | 225 ? -15% | 295 ? 12% |
| Random Write 4KB (MB/s) | 257.8 | 218.7 -15% | 226.19 -12% | 61.8 -76% | 247 ? -4% | 343 ? 33% |
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.8 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.4 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.8 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
3DMark 压力测试
| 3DMark | |
| Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
| Motorola Moto G57 Power | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G | |
| Samsung Galaxy A26 5G | |
| Motorola Moto G56 | |
| Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
| Samsung Galaxy A26 5G | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G | |
| Motorola Moto G57 Power | |
| Motorola Moto G56 | |
| Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability | |
| Motorola Moto G57 Power | |
| Samsung Galaxy A26 5G | |
| Motorola Moto G56 | |
Motorola Moto G57 Power audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 30% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 49% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy A26 5G audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (92.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.5% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 13% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 33% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
| Motorola Moto G57 Power 7000 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G 7000 mAh | Motorola Moto G56 5200 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A26 5G 5000 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery runtime | 9% | -9% | -29% | |
| Reader / Idle (h) | 39.1 | 40.9 5% | 33.1 -15% | |
| WiFi v1.3 (h) | 20.3 | 21.1 4% | 18.5 -9% | 12.3 -39% |
| Load (h) | 6.2 | 7.3 18% | 4.2 -32% | |
| H.264 (h) | 29.7 | 18.7 |
Notebookcheck 总体评分
摩托罗拉 Moto G57 Power 电池续航时间长，设计吸引人，在其他方面也提供了稳定的中端性能。
不过，摩托罗拉的更新承诺有限。
Motorola Moto G57 Power
- 02/07/2026 v8
Florian Schmitt
Total Sustainability Score: 可能的替代品一览
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Drive | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 75%  | Motorola Moto G57 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 710 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.1 | Amazon: 1. Motorola Moto G Power - 2026... 2. Silsewip [2pcs] Hydrogel Scr... 3. Fast Charger Cord USB C Wall... List Price: 299€ | 210.6 g | 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.72" 2400x1080 392 PPI IPS |
2. 72.6%  | Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 619 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.1 | Amazon: 1. Ibywind 2 Pack Screen Protec... 2. Anoowkoa 2 Pack for Xiaomi R... 3. Ibywind for Xiaomi Redmi 15 ... List Price: 250€ | 224 g | 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.90" 2340x1080 374 PPI IPS |
3. 74.9%  | Motorola Moto G56 MediaTek Dimensity 7060 ⎘ IMG BXM-8-256 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.1 | Amazon: 1. Ibywind For Motorola Moto G5... 2. USTIYA Case for Motorola Mot... 3. Mr.Shield Screen Protector c... List Price: 250 Euro | 200 g | 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.72" 2400x1080 391 PPI IPS |
4. 75.6%  | Samsung Galaxy A26 5G Samsung Exynos 1380 ⎘ ARM Mali-G68 MP5 ⎘ 6 GB Memory, 128 GB | Amazon: 1. SAMSUNG Galaxy A26 5G 2025 w... 2. SAMSUNG Galaxy A26 5G with A... 3. Samsung Galaxy A26 5G SM-A26... List Price: 299€ | 200 g | 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.70" 2340x1080 385 PPI Super AMOLED |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was freely purchased by the author at his/her own expense. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
