Notebookcheck Logo
摩托罗拉 Moto G56

价格适中、卖点突出 - 摩托罗拉 Moto G56 智能手机评测

物美价廉。

摩托罗拉 Moto G56 向我们展示了 275 美元以下可以买到多少智能手机。在我们的评测中,这款坚固耐用的中端手机不仅以其美观耐用的仿皮外壳、流畅的操作、出色的摄像头、eSIM 支持和超长的电池续航时间给人留下了深刻印象。不过,我们也发现了一些弱点。
Manuel Masiero, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
5G Android Smartphone Thunderbolt

摩托罗拉 Moto G56 的评价

Moto G56 的时尚外观使其看起来比摩托罗拉这款售价 250 美元的中端手机要贵得多。

但这款 6.72 英寸的设备并非噱头,因为除了坚固耐用的防水外壳(包括防滑仿皮后背)之外,它还具有其他优势,如电池续航时间长、支持 eSIM 卡,以及在日常使用中几乎总能确保流畅运行的 SoC。此外,快速指纹传感器、同价位产品中不错的相机质量、microSD 插槽、快速充电速度和无 PWM 显示屏也为该设计锦上添花。

买家必须接受较短的更新周期,即只有两次操作系统升级。此外,速度较慢的 Wi-Fi、不准确的 GPS 以及相当宽的显示屏边框(尤其是底部)也不是很好。

Pros

+ 无 PWM 显示屏
+ 性能良好
+ 仿皮后盖
+ IP68/IP69 认证
+ 4 年更新
+ 支持 eSIM
+ 出色的摄像头
+ 快速指纹传感器
+ 多种蓝牙音频编解码器
+ 电池寿命长

Cons

- IPS 显示屏
- 厚显示屏边框
- WiFi 5
- 不精确的 GPS
- 仅有 2 次操作系统升级

价格和供应情况

在撰写本评论时,摩托罗拉在线商店和亚马逊均未出售 Moto G56。

摩托罗拉对其中档智能手机 摩托 G55.其较大的后继机型 Moto G56 的起价不变,并有几处小的改进,包括外壳、自拍摄像头和电池的增强。我们的评测揭示了它在当前竞争中的优势。

规格

Motorola Moto G56 (Moto G50 Series)
Processor
MediaTek Dimensity 7060 8 x 2 - 2.6 GHz, Cortex-A78 / A55
Graphics adapter
IMG BXM-8-256
Memory
8 GB 
, LPDDR4X
Display
6.72 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 391 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, IPS, max. brightness 1000 nits , glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 256 GB 
, 235 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: 3.5mm headset port, Card Reader: microSD up to 2 TB, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Proximity, Accelerometer, Gyroscope, SAR sensor, E-Compass, Dolby Atmos, WiFi Direct, Camera2 API Level 3, DRM Widevine L1
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.3, 2G (Band 2/3/5/8), 3G (Band 1/2/5/8), 4G (Band 1/2/3/5/7/8/20/26/28/32/38/40/41/42/71), 5G (n1/n3/n5/n7/n8/n20/n26/n28/n38/n40/n41/n71/n75/n77/n78), Nano-SIM + eSIM, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.4 x 165.8 x 76.3
Battery
0 Wh, 5200 mAh Lithium-Ion, 30W max. charging speed, USB PD 3.0 and QC3+ supported
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 15
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (Sony LYTIA 600, f/1.8, PDAF) + 8 MP Ultrawide (f/2.2), video recording up to FullHD@60fps
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix (f/2.2), video recording up to FullHD@30fps
Additional features
Speakers: stereo, Keyboard: virtual, USB Type-C to USB Type-C cable, Guides, SIM tool, 24 Months Warranty, IP68/IP69 certified, MIL-STD 810H certified, Corning Gorilla Glass 7i (front), silicone finish (back); HDR support: HDR10, HDR10+, HLG; GPS: GPS (L1), Glonass (L1), Galileo (E1), Beidou (B1), QZSS; Bluetooth codecs: SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX TWS+, LDAC, LC3, Opus, LHDC V2-V5; SAR: Head SAR 0.98 W/kg, Body SAR 1.49 W/kg, fanless, waterproof
Weight
200 g
Price
250 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

外壳 - 防水,后部为人造皮革

Moto G55Moto G56 没有粉红色。它有绿色(莳萝色)和仿皮后盖,但同样引人注目。灰雾色和炫蓝色同样引人注目。喜欢低调外观的用户可以选择黑牡蛎色。

这款智能手机的后盖触感柔软,易于握持,后部特别时尚,方形摄像头模块无缝嵌入其中。不过,显示屏边框并不纤薄,边框完全由塑料制成。

Moto G56 通过了 IP68/69 认证,可以掉进水里而不会损坏。IPS 显示屏配有大猩猩 7i 玻璃保护。

尺寸比较

165.8 mm 76.3 mm 8.4 mm 200 g162.4 mm 75.7 mm 7.99 mm 190 g161.74 mm 76.32 mm 8.55 mm 190 g161.7 mm 78 mm 8.2 mm 209 g161.6 mm 73.8 mm 8.1 mm 179 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

功能 - Moto G56 配备 8GB 内存和 256GB 存储空间

摩托罗拉为 Moto G56 配备了 8 GB 内存和 256 GB 存储空间,其中档智能手机的官方售价为 274 美元。内部存储空间可通过 microSD 卡扩展,最大支持 2 TB。

左:SIM 卡插槽
左:SIM 卡插槽
右侧:音量摇杆、电源按钮
右侧:音量摇杆、电源按钮
首页: 麦克风
首页: 麦克风
底部:扬声器、USB-C 2.0、麦克风、3.5 毫米音频插孔
底部:扬声器、USB-C 2.0、麦克风、3.5 毫米音频插孔

microSD 读卡器

这款 microSD 读卡器在使用 Angelbird AV Pro V60 microSD 参考卡和闪迪 Extreme microSDXC UHS-I 时,传输速度不错,略高于同类产品的平均水平。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380 (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
55.32 MB/s +39%
Motorola Moto G56
MediaTek Dimensity 7060 (Angelbird V60)
39.8 MB/s
Motorola Moto G55
MediaTek Dimensity 7025 (Angelbird V60)
35.1 MB/s -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.72 - 58.9, n=67, last 2 years)
31.3 MB/s -21%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025 (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
30.1 MB/s -24%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

05101520253035404550556065707580859095Tooltip
Motorola Moto G56 IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7060, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; SanDisk Extreme microSDXC UHS-I: Ø46.9 (28.8-54.7)
Motorola Moto G55 IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB: Ø38.5 (22.3-46.4)
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø39.8 (25.4-57.9)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø38 (29.1-47.4)
Motorola Moto G56 IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7060, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; SanDisk Extreme microSDXC UHS-I: Ø78 (8.83-90.2)
Motorola Moto G55 IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB: Ø75.7 (49-78.9)
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø71.4 (38.1-99.5)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø73.7 (43.2-79.3)

软件 -Android 15 之后只有 2 个更新

Moto G56运行Android 15,除了少量内部应用程序外,摩托罗拉没有对其进行任何改动。该制造商承诺每两个月更新一次Android 安全更新,直至 2029 年 5 月。.不过,操作系统升级可能不会超过两次。

摩托罗拉 Moto G56
摩托罗拉 Moto G56
摩托罗拉 Moto G56
摩托罗拉 Moto G56
摩托罗拉 Moto G56
摩托罗拉 Moto G56

可持续性

Moto G56 采用无塑料包装,使用大豆油墨印刷,由符合 FSC Mix 认证的可回收材料制成。

摩托罗拉在其网站上公布了其在可持续发展方面所做的努力。不过,网站上没有关于该智能手机碳足迹的信息。备件和 DIY 维修说明可从摩托罗拉的合作伙伴Replacebase 获取。.

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - WiFi 5 和不精确的 GPS

良好的蜂窝频率范围包括 WiFi 5、蓝牙 5.3 和 NFC,这为 Moto G56 提供了坚实的通信功能。中端竞争对手如 Nothing Phone (2a)三星Galaxy A35 (5G)由于支持 WiFi 6,因此可以提供更快的 WiFi。我们的参考路由器是华硕 ROG Rapture AXE1100。

Networking
Motorola Moto G56
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
225 (min: 175) MBit/s ∼27%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
366 (min: 330) MBit/s ∼44%
Motorola Moto G55
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
264 (min: 210) MBit/s ∼32%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
313 (min: 282) MBit/s ∼38%
Nothing Phone (2a)
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
680 (min: 417) MBit/s ∼82%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
782 (min: 633) MBit/s ∼94%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
872 (min: 464) MBit/s ∼63%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
914 (min: 902) MBit/s ∼65%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
834 (min: 780) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
830 (min: 758) MBit/s ∼100%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
373 (min: 183) MBit/s ∼45%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
351 (min: 340) MBit/s ∼42%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
345 (min: 10.5) MBit/s ∼41%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
329 (min: 20.1) MBit/s ∼40%
Average of class Smartphone
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
724 (min: 49.8) MBit/s ∼87%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
737 (min: 52) MBit/s ∼89%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1386 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1405 (min: 451) MBit/s ∼100%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900Tooltip
Motorola Moto G56 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø225 (175-281)
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø834 (780-913)
Motorola Moto G56 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø366 (330-381)
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø829 (758-851)
室内 GPS 接收
室内 GPS 接收
户外 GPS 接收
户外 GPS 接收

作为一款导航设备,Moto G56 在测试中并没有给我们留下深刻印象。只要我们在一个地方停留一段时间,它就能准确定位。但是,当我们在路上行驶时,它的准确性往往会出现问题。

与 Garmin Venu 2 健身智能手表相比,这款智能手机有时会让我们在短途骑车时明显偏离轨道,即使在人口密度较低的地区也是如此。

摩托罗拉 Moto G56 GPS 测试:概述
摩托罗拉 Moto G56 GPS 测试:概述
摩托罗拉 Moto G56 GPS 测试 : Bridge
摩托罗拉 Moto G56 GPS 测试 : Bridge
摩托罗拉 Moto G56 GPS 测试: 转折点
摩托罗拉 Moto G56 GPS 测试: 转折点
Garmin Venu 2 GPS 测试:概述
Garmin Venu 2 GPS 测试:概述
Garmin Venu 2 GPS 测试:桥梁
Garmin Venu 2 GPS 测试:桥梁
Garmin Venu 2 GPS 测试:转折点
Garmin Venu 2 GPS 测试:转折点

电话功能和语音质量

Moto G56 只提供一个 nano-SIM 卡插槽,但也可以激活 eSIM 卡实现双 SIM 卡操作。支持 VoLTE 和 Wi-Fi 通话。

Moto G56 的语音质量表现良好。在我们的测试通话中,它的语音传输很自然,并能可靠地屏蔽背景噪音。

摄像头 - 5000 万像素 + 800 万像素双摄像头设置

自拍相机图像
自拍相机图像

Moto G56 配备 5000 万像素索尼 LYTIA 600 主摄像头和 800 万像素超广角摄像头。在专业模式下,相机应用程序支持 RAW 和 JPEG+RAW 拍摄。在超清晰模式下,可使用全部 5000 万像素。

主摄像头拍摄的照片相当锐利和美观,在高对比度和弱光环境下没有捕捉到太多细节,但色彩均衡,在这个价位的产品中相对较好。超广角摄像头的拍摄效果也不错,但只能提供快照质量。

主摄像头最高可录制每秒 60 帧的 1080p 视频。与 3200 万像素自拍摄像头(最高 1080p 30fps)一样,该摄像头的图像质量也相当不错,足以满足视频聊天或社交媒体应用内容的需要。不过,如果你看重视频,那么 Moto G56 不会让你满意,因为其他智能手机在图像清晰度和照明方面提供的更多。

Image comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Daylight shotDaylight shotUltra-wide angleLowlight shot

在测试实验室中,主摄像头证明了它能在最佳照明条件下准确捕捉色彩。然而,在 1 勒克斯的残余光照条件下,情况就不容乐观了:色彩图和测试图完全消失在黑暗中。

ColorChecker
8.3 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
1.3 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
ColorChecker Motorola Moto G56: 6.81 ∆E min: 1.28 - max: 11.12 ∆E
ColorChecker
30 ∆E
55.5 ∆E
40.2 ∆E
35.3 ∆E
46.1 ∆E
62.8 ∆E
54.2 ∆E
36.5 ∆E
44.6 ∆E
29.4 ∆E
65.5 ∆E
64.5 ∆E
31.9 ∆E
48.1 ∆E
38.2 ∆E
77.1 ∆E
45 ∆E
42.5 ∆E
94.8 ∆E
71.7 ∆E
52.9 ∆E
37.5 ∆E
24.4 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Motorola Moto G56: 47.61 ∆E min: 13.91 - max: 94.84 ∆E

配件和保修 - Moto G56 不含充电器

包装包括一条 USB-C 数据线、一个保护套、一个 SIM 卡工具和一份快速入门指南。

在德国,摩托罗拉为 Moto G56 提供 24 个月的保修服务。

输入设备和操作 - 120 赫兹屏幕和快速指纹传感器

120 Hz 触摸屏和联发科 Dimensity 7060 处理器相结合,确保了几乎永久流畅的运行。偶尔也会出现卡顿,但只有在使用要求非常高的应用程序时才会出现。

电源按钮上还装有指纹传感器,它可以让你可靠地解锁 Moto G56,几乎无需等待。通过自拍摄像头的 2D 面部识别进行身份验证也同样快速。

键盘肖像
键盘肖像
键盘景观
键盘景观

显示屏 - 1,000 nit IPS 屏幕,缺乏 PWM 功能

子像素
子像素

与许多竞争对手不同,Moto G56 使用的是 IPS 显示屏。虽然它无法达到 AMOLED 屏幕的高对比度,但在我们的测试中,它被证明是特别容易上眼的。我们的测量结果表明,IPS 屏幕在运行时没有任何 PWM 闪烁的痕迹。

摩托罗拉规定最大亮度为 1,000 cd/m²。在小图像部分(APL18),显示屏接近制造商的规格,峰值为 908 cd/m²。

795
cd/m²
806
cd/m²
776
cd/m²
761
cd/m²
853
cd/m²
799
cd/m²
801
cd/m²
763
cd/m²
786
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 853 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 793.3 cd/m² Minimum: 2.4 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 89 %
Center on Battery: 853 cd/m²
Contrast: 1580:1 (Black: 0.54 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 4.21 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.83}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 3 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5.1}
99% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.175
CCT: 6750 K
Motorola Moto G56
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.7"
Motorola Moto G55
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.5"
Nothing Phone (2a)
AMOLED, 2412x1084, 6.7"
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.6"
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7"
Screen
3%
41%
28%
36%
Brightness middle
853
968
13%
1033
21%
904
6%
1147
34%
Brightness
793
870
10%
1042
31%
912
15%
1146
45%
Brightness Distribution
89
83
-7%
96
8%
97
9%
96
8%
Black Level *
0.54
0.4
26%
Contrast
1580
2420
53%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
4.21
2.98
29%
1.6
62%
2.1
50%
1.6
62%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
6.69
8.76
-31%
2.5
63%
2.8
58%
3.7
45%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
3
5
-67%
1.2
60%
2.2
27%
2.3
23%
Gamma
2.175 101%
2.289 96%
2.07 106%
2.1 105%
2.27 97%
CCT
6750 96%
6509 100%
6482 100%
6478 100%
6368 102%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8342 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

使用照片光谱仪和卡尔曼分析工具进行的色彩分析表明,IPS 屏幕的色彩保真度足以满足日常使用。

色彩精度(自然色彩模式)
色彩精度(自然色彩模式)
色彩空间(自然色彩模式)
色彩空间(自然色彩模式)
灰度(自然色彩模式)
灰度(自然色彩模式)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
19.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 8.7 ms rise
↘ 11 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 41 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.5 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
27.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 15.2 ms rise
↘ 12.3 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 35 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.1 ms).

只要避免阳光直射可视角度稳定的显示屏,Moto G56 就可以在户外使用,不会受到太多影响。

室外使用
室外使用
室外使用
室外使用
室外使用
室外使用
视角
视角

性能 - Moto G56 配备联发科 Dimensity 7060 芯片

Moto G56 采用联发科 Dimensity 7060。从纸面上看,这颗八核 SoC 比 Dimensity 7025更快。 Moto G55然而,在实际使用中,两者并没有明显的差异。这并不是坏事,因为 Dimensity 7060 的性能足以帮助 Moto G56 实现良好的日常性能。尽管如此,价格相当的中端智能手机,如 Nothing Phone (2a)三星Galaxy A35 (5G)要更快一些。

Geekbench 6.4
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (196 - 3479, n=204, last 2 years)
1619 Points +56%
Nothing Phone (2a)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
1128 Points +9%
Motorola Moto G56
MediaTek Dimensity 7060, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
1038 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7060
  (n=1)
1038 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
1017 Points -2%
Motorola Moto G55
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
1013 Points -2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
947 Points -9%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (830 - 10401, n=204, last 2 years)
4670 Points +95%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
2906 Points +21%
Nothing Phone (2a)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
2592 Points +8%
Motorola Moto G56
MediaTek Dimensity 7060, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
2400 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7060
  (n=1)
2400 Points 0%
Motorola Moto G55
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
2370 Points -1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
2302 Points -4%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (142748 - 3015111, n=146, last 2 years)
1333864 Points +176%
Nothing Phone (2a)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
693939 Points +43%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
602612 Points +25%
Motorola Moto G56
MediaTek Dimensity 7060, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
483789 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7060
  (n=1)
483789 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
469182 Points -3%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average of class Smartphone
  (4507 - 27169, n=191, last 2 years)
14313 Points +5%
Motorola Moto G56
MediaTek Dimensity 7060, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
13629 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7060
  (n=1)
13629 Points 0%
Motorola Moto G55
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
13548 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
13430 Points -1%
Nothing Phone (2a)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
10924 Points -20%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
10629 Points -22%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 14066, n=151, last 2 years)
7071 Points +84%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
4416 Points +15%
Nothing Phone (2a)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
4115 Points +7%
Motorola Moto G56
MediaTek Dimensity 7060, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
3847 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7060
  (n=1)
3847 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
3678 Points -4%
System
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 20776, n=151, last 2 years)
10868 Points +49%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
8843 Points +21%
Motorola Moto G56
MediaTek Dimensity 7060, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
7294 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7060
  (n=1)
7294 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
7104 Points -3%
Nothing Phone (2a)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
6734 Points -8%
Memory
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 20652, n=151, last 2 years)
7942 Points +21%
Motorola Moto G56
MediaTek Dimensity 7060, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
6541 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7060
  (n=1)
6541 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
4735 Points -28%
Nothing Phone (2a)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
4567 Points -30%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
4301 Points -34%
Graphics
Average of class Smartphone
  (1046 - 384996, n=151, last 2 years)
22955 Points +454%
Nothing Phone (2a)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
10646 Points +157%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
7040 Points +70%
Motorola Moto G56
MediaTek Dimensity 7060, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
4140 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7060
  (n=1)
4140 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
4058 Points -2%
Web
Average of class Smartphone
  (858 - 2363, n=151, last 2 years)
1636 Points +48%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
1421 Points +28%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
1341 Points +21%
Motorola Moto G56
MediaTek Dimensity 7060, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
1109 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7060
  (n=1)
1109 Points 0%
Nothing Phone (2a)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
876 Points -21%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Nothing Phone (2a)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
26315 Points +336%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1267 - 81594, n=142, last 2 years)
18786 Points +211%
Motorola Moto G56
MediaTek Dimensity 7060, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
6034 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7060
  (n=1)
6034 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
5987 Points -1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
5946 Points -1%
AImark - Score v3.x
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 307528, n=127, last 2 years)
27124 Points +3172%
Nothing Phone (2a)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
11407 Points +1276%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
1019 Points +23%
Motorola Moto G56
MediaTek Dimensity 7060, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
829 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7060
  (n=1)
829 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
545 Points -34%
Geekbench AI
Single Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.4
Average of class Smartphone
  (231 - 1131, n=11, last 2 years)
573 Points +126%
Motorola Moto G56
MediaTek Dimensity 7060, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
254 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7060
  (n=1)
254 Points 0%
Half Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.4
Average of class Smartphone
  (231 - 4555, n=11, last 2 years)
1431 Points +369%
Motorola Moto G56
MediaTek Dimensity 7060, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
305 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7060
  (n=1)
305 Points 0%
Quantized TensorFlow NNAPI 1.4
Average of class Smartphone
  (133 - 4549, n=11, last 2 years)
2117 Points +1492%
Motorola Moto G56
MediaTek Dimensity 7060, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
133 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7060
  (n=1)
133 Points 0%
AI Benchmark
Score V5
Average of class Smartphone
  (46.4 - 3334, n=39, last 2 years)
949 Points +1115%
Motorola Moto G56
MediaTek Dimensity 7060, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
78.1 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7060
  (n=1)
78.1 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
67.3 Points -14%
Score V6
Average of class Smartphone
  (68.9 - 12578, n=55, last 2 years)
4310 Points +1742%
Motorola Moto G56
MediaTek Dimensity 7060, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
234 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7060
  (n=1)
234 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
212 Points -9%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
94 fps +34%
Motorola Moto G56
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7060, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
70 fps
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps -14%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
57 fps -19%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
159 fps +118%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
118 fps +62%
Motorola Moto G56
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7060, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
73 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
72 fps -1%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
68 fps +19%
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps +5%
Motorola Moto G56
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7060, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
57 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
47 fps -18%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
98 fps +58%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
79 fps +27%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
62 fps 0%
Motorola Moto G56
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7060, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
62 fps
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
57 fps +84%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
47 fps +52%
Motorola Moto G56
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7060, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
31 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
29 fps -6%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
67 fps +91%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
52 fps +49%
Motorola Moto G56
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7060, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
35 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
34 fps -3%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
34 fps +100%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
25 fps +47%
Motorola Moto G56
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7060, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
17 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
15 fps -12%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
40 fps +122%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
30 fps +67%
Motorola Moto G56
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7060, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
18 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
17 fps -6%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
33 fps +200%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
20 fps +82%
Motorola Moto G55
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
11 fps 0%
Motorola Moto G56
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7060, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
11 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
10 fps -9%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
21 fps +196%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
13 fps +83%
Motorola Moto G55
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7.1 fps 0%
Motorola Moto G56
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7060, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
7.1 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
6.7 fps -6%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
48 fps +167%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
30 fps +67%
Motorola Moto G55
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
18 fps 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
18 fps 0%
Motorola Moto G56
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7060, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
18 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
53 fps +165%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
34 fps +70%
Motorola Moto G55
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
20 fps 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
20 fps 0%
Motorola Moto G56
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7060, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
20 fps
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9.4 fps +213%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.8 fps +93%
Motorola Moto G55
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3 fps 0%
Motorola Moto G56
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7060, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2.8 fps -7%
Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=155, last 2 years)
141.9 Points +35%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G (Chrome 123.0.6312.100)
115.153 Points +9%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G (Chrome 133.0.6943.49)
111.073 Points +5%
Motorola Moto G56 (Chrome 138.0.7204.63)
105.344 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7060 (n=1)
105.3 Points 0%
Nothing Phone (2a) (Firefox 124.2.0)
76.624 Points -27%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 585, n=137, last 2 years)
180.8 runs/min +67%
Motorola Moto G56 (Chrome 138.0.7204.63)
108 runs/min
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7060 (n=1)
108 runs/min 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G (Chrome 133.0.6943.49)
107 runs/min -1%
Nothing Phone (2a) (Chrome 123.0.6312.99)
104 runs/min -4%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G (Chrome 123.0.6312.100)
104 runs/min -4%
Speedometer 3.0 - Score
Average of class Smartphone (1.03 - 34, n=104, last 2 years)
12.7 runs/min +77%
Motorola Moto G56 (Chrome 138.0.7204.63)
7.16 runs/min
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7060 (n=1)
7.16 runs/min 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G (Chrome 133.0.6943.49)
6.79 runs/min -5%
Nothing Phone (2a) (Chrome 123.0.6312.99)
6.62 runs/min -8%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G (Chrome 123.0.6312.100)
5.81 runs/min -19%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 273, n=149, last 2 years)
133.2 Points +31%
Nothing Phone (2a) (Firefox 124.2.0)
125 Points +23%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G (Chrome 123.0.6312.100)
123 Points +21%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G (Chrome 133.0.6943.49)
112 Points +10%
Motorola Moto G56 (Chrome 138.0.7204.63)
102 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7060 (n=1)
102 Points 0%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=204, last 2 years)
44584 Points +34%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G (Chrome 133.0.6943.49)
36371 Points +9%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G (Chrome 123.0.6312.100)
36010 Points +8%
Motorola Moto G55 (Chrome 128)
34723 Points +4%
Motorola Moto G56 (Chrome 138.0.7204.63)
33251 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7060 (n=1)
33251 Points 0%
Nothing Phone (2a) (Firefox 124.2.0)
18562 Points -44%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Nothing Phone (2a) (Firefox 124.2.0)
1569.6 ms * -28%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=158, last 2 years)
1297 ms * -6%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7060 (n=1)
1223 ms * -0%
Motorola Moto G56 (Chrome 138.0.7204.63)
1222.9 ms *
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G (Chrome 133.0.6943.49)
1130.9 ms * +8%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G (Chrome 123.0.6312.100)
1099 ms * +10%

* ... smaller is better

Motorola Moto G56Motorola Moto G55Nothing Phone (2a)Samsung Galaxy A35 5GXiaomi Redmi Note 14 5GAverage 256 GB UFS 2.2 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-3%
17%
-46%
2%
-4%
73%
Sequential Read 256KB
1013.35
950.4
-6%
1028.37
1%
529.32
-48%
950.62
-6%
Sequential Write 256KB
859.11
815.8
-5%
952
11%
270
-69%
792.56
-8%
735 ?(369 - 943, n=47)
-14%
Random Read 4KB
230.68
234.6
2%
273.19
18%
244.24
6%
257.91
12%
Random Write 4KB
226.19
222.4
-2%
311.8
38%
62.59
-72%
245.16
8%

游戏 - Moto G56 上的 "元心冲击 "也很有趣

Dimensity 7060 由 IMG BXM-8-256图形处理器。Gamebench测试表明,其性能足以相对流畅地运行要求更高的游戏,如《源氏冲击》。不过,仍然会出现帧卡顿现象。

源泉冲击
源泉冲击
PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Motorola Moto G56; Asphalt 9: Legends; Standard / low; 24.6.1a: Ø59.4 (48-61)
Motorola Moto G56; Asphalt 9: Legends; High Quality; 24.6.1a: Ø59.3 (45-61)
Motorola Moto G56; Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps; 5.7.0_33477673_33723678: Ø43.6 (21-60)
Motorola Moto G56; Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps; 5.7.0_33477673_33723678: Ø26 (19-33)
Motorola Moto G56; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 3.8.0: Ø39.6 (36-41)
Motorola Moto G56; PUBG Mobile; HD; 3.8.0: Ø29.7 (22-31)

排放 - 热销智能手机,音质出色

温度

在日常使用中,Moto G56 几乎不会发热,但在持续最大负载的情况下,它可能会变得非常热。在运行 "Burnout "基准测试一小时后,我们测得其表面温度高达 49°C。

不过,正如 GFXBench 的 T-Rex 压力测试场景所显示的那样,"节流 "并不是一个问题。即使在第 30 次运行后,帧速率仍与开始时一样高。

3DMark 压力测试无法在 Moto G56 上运行。
3DMark 压力测试无法在 Moto G56 上运行。
压力测试GFXBench T-Rex
压力测试GFXBench T-Rex
Max. Load
 49 °C42.5 °C40.1 °C 
 47.8 °C45.3 °C38.5 °C 
 46.6 °C41.1 °C38 °C 
Maximum: 49 °C
Average: 43.2 °C
39.4 °C41.5 °C45.7 °C
44.2 °C43.7 °C46.6 °C
39.6 °C44.7 °C48 °C
Maximum: 44.2 °C
Average: 87.7 °C
Power Supply (max.)  44.1 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 43.2 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 49 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.2 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.2 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
摩托罗拉 Moto G56
摩托罗拉 Moto G56

发言人

支持的蓝牙编解码器
支持的蓝牙编解码器

Moto G56 的立体声扬声器产生的声音缺乏低音,但由于中高音均衡,听起来还是不错的。

耳机和其他外置音频设备可通过蓝牙 5.3 和 3.5 毫米插孔与智能手机连接。Moto G56 支持当前大多数蓝牙编解码器。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2047.848.72536.838.93135.231.14034.331.85038.135.36329.127.48020.320.610022.623.91251937.316019.342.820017.35025017.854.931520.661.140016.663.650019.468.263025.369.180025.567.6100020.974.5125019.174.3160020.974.1200017.574.1250016.373.9315016.471.1400018.372.2500023.267630021.26980002474.11000020731250019.575.81600018.759.9SPL33.184.5N1.861.1median 19.4median 69Delta2.28.927.329.426.238.625.935.329.235.835.633.625.938.522.137.717.840.717.144.318.153.914.252.214.156.310.757.31157.312.863.511.161.51268.711.775.21280.312.878.512.480.612.381.713.380.6138213.580.213.277.813.87513.774.313.470.313.362.524.990.90.681.3median 13.2median 74.3111.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMotorola Moto G56Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Motorola Moto G56 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 20% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 41% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy A35 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.6% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.9% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 14% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 77% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 36% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

电池续航时间 - 5,200 毫安时电池提供强大的续航能力

耗电量

Moto G56 可通过最大功率为 30 瓦的有线充电器充电。在我们的测试中,充满电需要 1 小时 18 分钟。充电至 80% 需要 52 分钟。

摩托罗拉手机在耗电量方面表现堪称典范。在空闲和负载情况下,它的平均耗电量低于竞争对手。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1 / 1.3 / 1.9 Watt
Load midlight 3.5 / 7.2 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Motorola Moto G56
5200 mAh
Nothing Phone (2a)
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
5110 mAh
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7060
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-15%
-31%
-7%
0%
-27%
Idle Minimum *
1
0.81
19%
0.89
11%
1.15
-15%
1 ?(n=1)
-0%
Idle Average *
1.3
2.01
-55%
1.99
-53%
1.55
-19%
1.3 ?(n=1)
-0%
Idle Maximum *
1.9
2.07
-9%
2.14
-13%
1.57
17%
1.9 ?(n=1)
-0%
Load Average *
3.5
4.16
-19%
4.57
-31%
3.87
-11%
3.5 ?(n=1)
-0%
Load Maximum *
7.2
7.91
-10%
12.31
-71%
7.66
-6%
7.2 ?(n=1)
-0%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910Tooltip
Motorola Moto G56 MediaTek Dimensity 7060; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø3.89 (1.614-7.19)
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Samsung Exynos 1380; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø5.62 (1.191-10.8)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7025; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø3.33 (1.051-6.28)
Motorola Moto G56 MediaTek Dimensity 7060; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.262 (1.009-1.725)
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Samsung Exynos 1380; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.46 (1.262-2.89)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7025; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.116 (1.08-1.383)

Power consumption: GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

012345Tooltip
Motorola Moto G56 MediaTek Dimensity 7060; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø4.65 (2.86-5.46)
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Samsung Exynos 1380; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø4.37 (3.89-5.98)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7025; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø2.91 (2.67-3.6)
Motorola Moto G56 MediaTek Dimensity 7060; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.262 (1.009-1.725)
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Samsung Exynos 1380; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.46 (1.262-2.89)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7025; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.116 (1.08-1.383)

电池运行时间

Moto G56 的 5,200 mAh 电池为这款候选机型提供了良好的续航时间。在实际的 Wi-Fi 测试中,它的续航时间达到了 18 小时 30 秒,不仅超过了前代产品,也超过了所有同类设备。

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
18h 30min
Battery Runtime - WiFi v1.3
Motorola Moto G56
5200 mAh
1110 min
Motorola Moto G55
5000 mAh
944 min
Nothing Phone (2a)
5000 mAh
1011 min
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
5000 mAh
902 min
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
5110 mAh
773 min

Notebookcheck 总体评分

摩托罗拉 Moto G56 以低廉的价格提供了大量功能。除了高品质的外壳,它的主要优点还包括基本流畅的性能和较长的电池续航时间。这款中档智能手机的缺点是 Wi-Fi 速度慢、GPS 不准确和更新时间短。

Motorola Moto G56 - 07/21/2025 v8
Manuel Masiero

Chassis
90%
Keyboard
71 / 75 → 95%
Pointing Device
89%
Connectivity
43 / 69 → 63%
Weight
88%
Battery
91%
Display
83%
Games Performance
7 / 55 → 13%
Application Performance
62 / 85 → 72%
AI Performance
11%
Temperature
83%
Noise
100%
Audio
76 / 90 → 84%
Camera
68%
Average
62%
75%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
0%
Packaging
75%
Power Use
95.7%
Repairability
60%
Software Updates
55.5%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 47.7%

可能的替代品比较

Benchmark Comparison Plugin: ERROR, Layout "57" not supported!

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 价格适中、卖点突出 - 摩托罗拉 Moto G56 智能手机评测
Manuel Masiero, 2025-07-24 (Update: 2025-07-24)