Notebookcheck

小米Max 3智能手机评测

Mike Wobker, 👁 Florian Schmitt, Andrea Grüblinger (translated by Zewei Shen), 11/22/2018
Android Chinese Tech Phablet Smartphone Touchscreen

屏幕尺寸最大化。 6.9英寸的小米Max 3不仅为用户提供了比上一代还要大的屏幕,也在硬件配置上做出了一定的升级。

Xiaomi Mi Max 3 (Mi Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, 高通骁龙636
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 509, 高通Adreno 509
Memory
4096 MB 
Display
6.9 inch 18:9, 2160 x 1080 pixel 350 PPI, capacitive, IPS, glossy: yes
Storage
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 64 GB eMMC 闪存,64 GB,50 GB可用, 50 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm audio port, Card Reader: microSD, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: acceleration sensor, gyroscope, proximity sensor, compass
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM (850/900/1800/1900), 3G WCDMA (850/900/1900/2100), FDD LTE (B1/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B20), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8 x 176 x 87.4
Battery
5500 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Android 8.1 Oreo
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix f/1.9
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix f/2.0
Additional features
Speakers: 1 speaker, Keyboard: onscreen, Keyboard Light: yes, USB charger, EU adapter, USB Type-C cable, MIUI 9.6, 24 Months Warranty, SAR value (head): 1.584 W/kg, SAR value (body): 1.417 W/kg, fanless
Weight
221 g, Power Supply: 65 g
Price
250 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Xiaomi Mi Max 3
Xiaomi Mi Max 3
Xiaomi Mi Max 3
Xiaomi Mi Max 3

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Mi Max 3
Adreno 509, 636, 64 GB eMMC Flash
344 (min: 326, max: 350) MBit/s ∼100%
Asus Zenfone 5 ZE620KL
Adreno 509, 636, 64 GB eMMC Flash
339 MBit/s ∼99% -1%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
Adreno 508, 630, 32 GB eMMC Flash
309 MBit/s ∼90% -10%
JVC J20
Adreno 508, 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash
221 MBit/s ∼64% -36%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=311)
212 MBit/s ∼62% -38%
Honor Play
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
188 MBit/s ∼55% -45%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
Adreno 508, 630, 32 GB eMMC Flash
347 MBit/s ∼100% +31%
Asus Zenfone 5 ZE620KL
Adreno 509, 636, 64 GB eMMC Flash
308 MBit/s ∼89% +16%
Xiaomi Mi Max 3
Adreno 509, 636, 64 GB eMMC Flash
265 (min: 253, max: 270) MBit/s ∼76%
JVC J20
Adreno 508, 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash
226 MBit/s ∼65% -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=311)
206 MBit/s ∼59% -22%
Honor Play
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
190 MBit/s ∼55% -28%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø342 (326-350)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø265 (253-270)
GPS Xiaomi Mi Max 3
GPS Xiaomi Mi Max 3
GPS Xiaomi Mi Max 3
GPS Xiaomi Mi Max 3
GPS Xiaomi Mi Max 3
GPS Xiaomi Mi Max 3
GPS Garmin Edge 520
GPS Garmin Edge 520
GPS Garmin Edge 520
GPS Garmin Edge 520
GPS Garmin Edge 520
GPS Garmin Edge 520

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
Xiaomi Mi Max 3 - Test chart
Xiaomi Mi Max 3 - Test chart
Xiaomi Mi Max 3 - Test chart (detail)
522
cd/m²
500
cd/m²
491
cd/m²
512
cd/m²
508
cd/m²
481
cd/m²
530
cd/m²
511
cd/m²
486
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 530 cd/m² Average: 504.6 cd/m² Minimum: 1.06 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 508 cd/m²
Contrast: 1814:1 (Black: 0.28 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.85 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.2
ΔE Greyscale 1.7 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
99.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.226
Xiaomi Mi Max 3
IPS, 2160x1080, 6.9
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
IPS, 2160x1080, 6
Honor Play
IPS, 2340x1080, 6.3
JVC J20
IPS, 2160x1080, 5.65
Asus Zenfone 5 ZE620KL
IPS, 2246x1080, 6.2
Screen
-6%
-31%
-134%
-41%
Brightness middle
508
597
18%
435
-14%
411
-19%
595
17%
Brightness
505
592
17%
426
-16%
426
-16%
561
11%
Brightness Distribution
91
92
1%
89
-2%
82
-10%
87
-4%
Black Level *
0.28
0.32
-14%
0.39
-39%
0.53
-89%
0.54
-93%
Contrast
1814
1866
3%
1115
-39%
775
-57%
1102
-39%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.85
2.4
16%
2.89
-1%
8.84
-210%
4.2
-47%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
6.21
5.3
15%
6.03
3%
15.08
-143%
6
3%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.7
3.4
-100%
4.1
-141%
10.7
-529%
4.7
-176%
Gamma
2.226 99%
2.2 100%
2.251 98%
2.433 90%
2.12 104%
CCT
6860 95%
7172 91%
7408 88%
10717 61%
7577 86%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 2358 Hz ≤ 10 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 2358 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 10 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 2358 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8929 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
22 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 9 ms rise
↘ 13 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 23 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (25.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
45 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 22 ms rise
↘ 23 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 69 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (41 ms).
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Max 3
98170 Points ∼55%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
70346 Points ∼39% -28%
Honor Play
178745 Points ∼100% +82%
JVC J20
67408 Points ∼38% -31%
Asus Zenfone 5 ZE620KL
125213 Points ∼70% +28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (92672 - 125213, n=9)
98722 Points ∼55% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (23275 - 254229, n=394)
76519 Points ∼43% -22%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Max 3
118959 Points ∼78%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
89006 Points ∼58% -25%
Honor Play
152773 Points ∼100% +28%
JVC J20
89279 Points ∼58% -25%
Asus Zenfone 5 ZE620KL
138661 Points ∼91% +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (115565 - 138661, n=9)
119151 Points ∼78% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (17073 - 348178, n=171)
117893 Points ∼77% -1%
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Max 3
6040 Points ∼65%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
5659 Points ∼61% -6%
Honor Play
9326 Points ∼100% +54%
JVC J20
5762 Points ∼62% -5%
Asus Zenfone 5 ZE620KL
6999 Points ∼75% +16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (6040 - 6999, n=8)
6422 Points ∼69% +6%
Average of class Smartphone (4058 - 13531, n=424)
4956 Points ∼53% -18%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Max 3
1037 Points ∼95%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
936 Points ∼86% -10%
Honor Play
1091 Points ∼100% +5%
JVC J20
862 Points ∼79% -17%
Asus Zenfone 5 ZE620KL
1088 Points ∼100% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (1018 - 1088, n=8)
1055 Points ∼97% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (7 - 1731, n=500)
697 Points ∼64% -33%
Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Max 3
1608 Points ∼72%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
1480 Points ∼66% -8%
Honor Play
2231 Points ∼100% +39%
JVC J20
1470 Points ∼66% -9%
Asus Zenfone 5 ZE620KL
1605 Points ∼72% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (1590 - 1625, n=8)
1604 Points ∼72% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (18 - 15969, n=500)
1735 Points ∼78% +8%
Memory (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Max 3
2492 Points ∼100%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
1334 Points ∼54% -46%
Honor Play
2417 Points ∼97% -3%
JVC J20
1159 Points ∼47% -53%
Asus Zenfone 5 ZE620KL
2314 Points ∼93% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (1461 - 2492, n=8)
2040 Points ∼82% -18%
Average of class Smartphone (21 - 6283, n=500)
1243 Points ∼50% -50%
System (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Max 3
4320 Points ∼81%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
3284 Points ∼61% -24%
Honor Play
3795 Points ∼71% -12%
JVC J20
3288 Points ∼61% -24%
Asus Zenfone 5 ZE620KL
5348 Points ∼100% +24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (4320 - 5348, n=8)
4594 Points ∼86% +6%
Average of class Smartphone (369 - 12202, n=500)
2509 Points ∼47% -42%
Overall (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Max 3
2058 Points ∼95%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
1570 Points ∼72% -24%
Honor Play
2174 Points ∼100% +6%
JVC J20
1483 Points ∼68% -28%
Asus Zenfone 5 ZE620KL
2156 Points ∼99% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (1847 - 2156, n=8)
1991 Points ∼92% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (150 - 6097, n=504)
1253 Points ∼58% -39%
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Max 3
4508 Points ∼53%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
3621 Points ∼43% -20%
Honor Play
8454 Points ∼100% +88%
JVC J20
3681 Points ∼44% -18%
Asus Zenfone 5 ZE620KL
5041 Points ∼60% +12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (4309 - 5041, n=9)
4555 Points ∼54% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (836 - 21070, n=198)
4508 Points ∼53% 0%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Max 3
4939 Points ∼74%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
4152 Points ∼62% -16%
Honor Play
6673 Points ∼100% +35%
JVC J20
4220 Points ∼63% -15%
Asus Zenfone 5 ZE620KL
5426 Points ∼81% +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (4781 - 5426, n=9)
4974 Points ∼75% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (883 - 11598, n=248)
4298 Points ∼64% -13%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Max 3
1335 Points ∼70%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
858 Points ∼45% -36%
Honor Play
1904 Points ∼100% +43%
JVC J20
879 Points ∼46% -34%
Asus Zenfone 5 ZE620KL
1506 Points ∼79% +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (1323 - 1506, n=9)
1354 Points ∼71% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (394 - 4824, n=249)
1267 Points ∼67% -5%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Max 3
2355 Points ∼83%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
1712 Points ∼61% -27%
Honor Play
2827 Points ∼100% +20%
JVC J20
1765 Points ∼62% -25%
Asus Zenfone 5 ZE620KL
2634 Points ∼93% +12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (2251 - 2634, n=9)
2361 Points ∼84% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2281 - 4216, n=352)
1642 Points ∼58% -30%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Max 3
815 Points ∼27%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
718 Points ∼24% -12%
Honor Play
3018 Points ∼100% +270%
JVC J20
721 Points ∼24% -12%
Asus Zenfone 5 ZE620KL
814 Points ∼27% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (797 - 818, n=9)
813 Points ∼27% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (815 - 5241, n=352)
1186 Points ∼39% +46%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Max 3
954 Points ∼32%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
824 Points ∼28% -14%
Honor Play
2973 Points ∼100% +212%
JVC J20
830 Points ∼28% -13%
Asus Zenfone 5 ZE620KL
962 Points ∼32% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (934 - 962, n=9)
951 Points ∼32% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (951 - 4734, n=360)
1134 Points ∼38% +19%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Max 3
1349 Points ∼48%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
1757 Points ∼62% +30%
Honor Play
2832 Points ∼100% +110%
JVC J20
1770 Points ∼63% +31%
Asus Zenfone 5 ZE620KL
2626 Points ∼93% +95%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (1349 - 2626, n=9)
2266 Points ∼80% +68%
Average of class Smartphone (532 - 4215, n=385)
1538 Points ∼54% +14%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Max 3
1335 Points ∼36%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
1248 Points ∼33% -7%
Honor Play
3734 Points ∼100% +180%
JVC J20
1257 Points ∼34% -6%
Asus Zenfone 5 ZE620KL
1329 Points ∼36% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (1313 - 1353, n=9)
1333 Points ∼36% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (46 - 8312, n=385)
1627 Points ∼44% +22%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Max 3
1477 Points ∼42%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
1334 Points ∼38% -10%
Honor Play
3487 Points ∼100% +136%
JVC J20
1344 Points ∼39% -9%
Asus Zenfone 5 ZE620KL
1493 Points ∼43% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (1458 - 1493, n=9)
1477 Points ∼42% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (58 - 6454, n=393)
1384 Points ∼40% -6%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Max 3
17073 Points ∼85%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
13217 Points ∼66% -23%
Honor Play
20035 Points ∼100% +17%
JVC J20
13153 Points ∼66% -23%
Asus Zenfone 5 ZE620KL
19365 Points ∼97% +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (16719 - 19365, n=9)
17286 Points ∼86% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (3958 - 37475, n=540)
12875 Points ∼64% -25%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Max 3
20836 Points ∼60%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
18472 Points ∼53% -11%
Honor Play
34836 Points ∼100% +67%
JVC J20
18471 Points ∼53% -11%
Asus Zenfone 5 ZE620KL
20722 Points ∼59% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (20610 - 20909, n=9)
20801 Points ∼60% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2465 - 162695, n=540)
17971 Points ∼52% -14%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Max 3
19863 Points ∼66%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
16972 Points ∼57% -15%
Honor Play
29924 Points ∼100% +51%
JVC J20
16948 Points ∼57% -15%
Asus Zenfone 5 ZE620KL
20404 Points ∼68% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (19714 - 20404, n=9)
19905 Points ∼67% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2915 - 77599, n=541)
15098 Points ∼50% -24%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Max 3
36 fps ∼31%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
30 fps ∼26% -17%
Honor Play
115 fps ∼100% +219%
JVC J20
29 fps ∼25% -19%
Asus Zenfone 5 ZE620KL
36 fps ∼31% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (35 - 36, n=9)
35.7 fps ∼31% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 251, n=565)
31.3 fps ∼27% -13%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Max 3
34 fps ∼57%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
28 fps ∼47% -18%
Honor Play
60 fps ∼100% +76%
JVC J20
28 fps ∼47% -18%
Asus Zenfone 5 ZE620KL
34 fps ∼57% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (33 - 40, n=9)
34.9 fps ∼58% +3%
Average of class Smartphone (6.9 - 120, n=568)
24.9 fps ∼42% -27%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Max 3
16 fps ∼26%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
14 fps ∼23% -12%
Honor Play
62 fps ∼100% +288%
JVC J20
14 fps ∼23% -12%
Asus Zenfone 5 ZE620KL
16 fps ∼26% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (16 - 16, n=9)
16 fps ∼26% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2.2 - 132, n=487)
16.8 fps ∼27% +5%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Max 3
15 (min: 16) fps ∼27%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
13 fps ∼24% -13%
Honor Play
55 fps ∼100% +267%
JVC J20
13 fps ∼24% -13%
Asus Zenfone 5 ZE620KL
15 fps ∼27% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (14 - 18, n=9)
15.2 fps ∼28% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 115, n=490)
16 fps ∼29% +7%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Max 3
10 fps ∼26%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
9.8 fps ∼25% -2%
Honor Play
39 fps ∼100% +290%
JVC J20
9.7 fps ∼25% -3%
Asus Zenfone 5 ZE620KL
10 fps ∼26% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (9.8 - 10, n=9)
9.98 fps ∼26% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 88, n=349)
14.3 fps ∼37% +43%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Max 3
9.8 fps ∼32%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
9.3 fps ∼30% -5%
Honor Play
31 fps ∼100% +216%
JVC J20
9.2 fps ∼30% -6%
Asus Zenfone 5 ZE620KL
9.8 fps ∼32% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (9.1 - 12, n=9)
9.97 fps ∼32% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (9.8 - 110, n=352)
13.9 fps ∼45% +42%
GFXBench
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Max 3
6.3 fps ∼32%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
5.6 fps ∼28% -11%
Honor Play
20 fps ∼100% +217%
JVC J20
5.5 fps ∼28% -13%
Asus Zenfone 5 ZE620KL
6.3 fps ∼32% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (6.3 - 6.3, n=9)
6.3 fps ∼32% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (6.3 - 54, n=280)
9.86 fps ∼49% +57%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Max 3
6 fps ∼32%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
5.3 fps ∼28% -12%
Honor Play
19 fps ∼100% +217%
JVC J20
5.2 fps ∼27% -13%
Asus Zenfone 5 ZE620KL
6 fps ∼32% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (5.7 - 7.4, n=9)
6.11 fps ∼32% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (6 - 58, n=283)
8.89 fps ∼47% +48%

Legend

 
Xiaomi Mi Max 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Qualcomm Adreno 509, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Qualcomm Adreno 508, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Honor Play HiSilicon Kirin 970, ARM Mali-G72 MP12, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
JVC J20 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Qualcomm Adreno 508, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Asus Zenfone 5 ZE620KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Qualcomm Adreno 509, 64 GB eMMC Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Asus Zenfone 5 ZE620KL (Chrome 67)
51.534 Points ∼100% +16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (44.2 - 51.5, n=9)
45.4 Points ∼88% +2%
Xiaomi Mi Max 3 (Chrome 69)
44.568 Points ∼86%
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 273, n=423)
36.7 Points ∼71% -18%
Honor Play (Chrome 68)
33.094 Points ∼64% -26%
JVC J20 (Chrome 68)
28.25 Points ∼55% -37%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus (Chrome 67)
27.615 Points ∼54% -38%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Asus Zenfone 5 ZE620KL (Chrome 67)
9746 Points ∼100% +18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (8273 - 9746, n=9)
8744 Points ∼90% +6%
Xiaomi Mi Max 3 (Chrome 69)
8273 Points ∼85%
Honor Play (Chrome 68)
6692 Points ∼69% -19%
Average of class Smartphone (1506 - 43280, n=559)
5558 Points ∼57% -33%
JVC J20 (Chrome 68)
5117 Points ∼53% -38%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus (Chrome 67)
5017 Points ∼51% -39%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=579)
11477 ms * ∼100% -151%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus (Chrome 67)
10086 ms * ∼88% -120%
JVC J20 (Chrome 68)
9660 ms * ∼84% -111%
Honor Play (Chrome 68)
6220.7 ms * ∼54% -36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (4105 - 4820, n=9)
4630 ms * ∼40% -1%
Xiaomi Mi Max 3 (Chrome 69)
4578.1 ms * ∼40%
Asus Zenfone 5 ZE620KL (Chrome 67)
4105.3 ms * ∼36% +10%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (147 - 184, n=7)
158 Points ∼100% +7%
Xiaomi Mi Max 3 (Chrome 69)
148 Points ∼94%
Honor Play (Chrome 68)
119 Points ∼75% -20%
Average of class Smartphone (91 - 362, n=284)
111 Points ∼70% -25%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus (Chrome 67)
106 Points ∼67% -28%

* ... smaller is better

Xiaomi Mi Max 3Sony Xperia XA2 PlusHonor PlayJVC J20Asus Zenfone 5 ZE620KLAverage 64 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-15%
70%
-17%
3%
-24%
-42%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
60.28 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
67.02 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
11%
71.86 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
19%
63 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
5%
65.19 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
8%
54.3 (14.1 - 74.7, n=71)
-10%
45.8 (3.4 - 87.1, n=323)
-24%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
83.79 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
86.01 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
3%
82.8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-1%
82.8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-1%
85.79 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
2%
72.6 (21.1 - 86.9, n=71)
-13%
64 (8.2 - 96.5, n=323)
-24%
Random Write 4KB
87.08
10.5
-88%
155.5
79%
6.3
-93%
83.54
-4%
19.8 (3.4 - 87.1, n=78)
-77%
16.1 (0.14 - 164, n=608)
-82%
Random Read 4KB
72.87
77.43
6%
142.4
95%
58.3
-20%
71.16
-2%
50.3 (11.4 - 149, n=78)
-31%
38.3 (1.59 - 173, n=608)
-47%
Sequential Write 256KB
185.4
146.16
-21%
188.3
2%
199.7
8%
201.75
9%
164 (40 - 246, n=78)
-12%
79.8 (2.99 - 246, n=608)
-57%
Sequential Read 256KB
274.63
281.06
2%
894.5
226%
270.6
-1%
286.61
4%
269 (115 - 704, n=78)
-2%
230 (12.1 - 895, n=608)
-16%
Max. Load
 31.4 °C28.7 °C29 °C 
 32.3 °C29 °C29.1 °C 
 31.1 °C29.2 °C28.3 °C 
Maximum: 32.3 °C
Average: 29.8 °C
29.2 °C29.8 °C30.5 °C
28.7 °C29.8 °C30.5 °C
29.1 °C29.4 °C30.5 °C
Maximum: 30.5 °C
Average: 29.7 °C
Power Supply (max.)  35.2 °C | Room Temperature 21.9 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 29.8 °C / 86 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 32.3 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 35.7 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 30.5 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 34.2 °C / 94 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.3 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 33.2 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2039.143.32539.141.63140.333403534.85037.333.96325.221.98024.622.81002524.412520.120.316020.531.120018.243.725018.448.231515.650.240015.757.350015.16163013.265.280014.768.8100013.569.5125014.667.8160012.968.5200011.269.4250010.968.1315010.967.3400010.765.1500010.564.6630010.660.6800010.659.71000010.761.31250010.755.11600010.741.6SPL24.961.878.6N0.614.441.9median 13.2median 61Delta3.311.3303836.136.83233.529.427.931.536.327.924.722.121.52223.821.224.421.529.720.340.118.446.417.354.316.760.91760.616.162.915.865.615.870.415.372.115.874.514.971.91573.114.775.514.774.91572.515.173.11573.615.473.61567.116.347.727.684.7159.3median 15.8median 67.11.913.1hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Mi Max 3Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Mi Max 3 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.9% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 26% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 55% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Sony Xperia XA2 Plus audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 46% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 68% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0 / 0.1 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.7 / 1.5 / 2.2 Watt
Load midlight 3.8 / 6.5 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi Mi Max 3
5500 mAh
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
3580 mAh
Honor Play
3750 mAh
JVC J20
3400 mAh
Asus Zenfone 5 ZE620KL
3300 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
17%
-73%
-15%
-134%
-30%
-5%
Idle Minimum *
0.7
0.35
50%
1.4
-100%
1
-43%
1.75
-150%
0.981 (0.6 - 1.75, n=9)
-40%
0.879 (0.2 - 3.4, n=642)
-26%
Idle Average *
1.5
1.81
-21%
2.6
-73%
1.6
-7%
4.48
-199%
2.28 (1.4 - 4.48, n=9)
-52%
1.721 (0.6 - 6.2, n=641)
-15%
Idle Maximum *
2.2
1.83
17%
4.3
-95%
2.8
-27%
4.5
-105%
2.66 (2 - 4.5, n=9)
-21%
1.998 (0.74 - 6.6, n=642)
9%
Load Average *
3.8
3.31
13%
6.5
-71%
4
-5%
7.92
-108%
4.58 (3.65 - 7.92, n=9)
-21%
4.04 (0.8 - 10.8, n=636)
-6%
Load Maximum *
6.5
4.97
24%
8.2
-26%
5.9
9%
13.62
-110%
7.47 (5.1 - 13.6, n=9)
-15%
5.76 (1.2 - 14.2, n=636)
11%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
21h 45min
Xiaomi Mi Max 3
5500 mAh
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
3580 mAh
Honor Play
3750 mAh
JVC J20
3400 mAh
Asus Zenfone 5 ZE620KL
3300 mAh
Battery Runtime
WiFi v1.3
1305
837
-36%
710
-46%
726
-44%
497
-62%

Pros

+ 高对比度,高亮度的屏幕
+ 蓝牙5.0
+ 超长续航

Cons

- 更多设置需要联网修改
- USB 2.0
In review: Xiaomi Mi Max 3. Test unit provided by TradingShenzen.
In review: Xiaomi Mi Max 3. Test unit provided by TradingShenzen.

在我们的测试中,小米Max 3在一个方面远超竞争对手:它的尺寸。而在其他方面来看,这也是一款拥有性能良好的的中端设备,这使得它在同类智能手机中有着稳固的地位。凭借其可圈可点的相机,蓝牙5.0以及优秀的WLAN传输速度,这台安卓平板手机在各方面都表现得很均衡。

“小米Max 3是一台以超大屏幕来说服消费者的高性能手机。”

在用户友好程度上,感兴趣的买家不仅仅需要在意6.9英寸的巨大屏幕,同时对于一些海外用户来说,谷歌市场并没有被包括在MIUI中,而是需要进行单独的安装。

Xiaomi Mi Max 3 - 10/16/2018 v6
Mike Wobker

Chassis
77%
Keyboard
65 / 75 → 86%
Pointing Device
82%
Connectivity
44 / 60 → 73%
Weight
88%
Battery
100%
Display
91%
Games Performance
45 / 63 → 71%
Application Performance
60 / 70 → 86%
Temperature
94%
Noise
100%
Audio
73 / 91 → 80%
Camera
64%
Average
76%
84%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 小米Max 3智能手机评测
Mike Wobker, 2018-11-22 (Update: 2018-11-23)