小米 Mi 4s 智能手机简短评测
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 488.2 cd/m²
Contrast: 869:1 (Black: 0.562 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 3.48 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.78}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 3.06 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
Gamma: 2.4
CCT: 6627 K
| Xiaomi Mi 4s 5", 1920x1080 | Google Nexus 5X 5.2", 1920x1080 | Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL 5", 1280x720 | HTC One A9 5", 1920x1080 | OnePlus X 5", 1920x1080 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Response Times | |||||
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 36.4 ? | ||||
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 21.6 ? | ||||
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | 237 ? | ||||
| Screen | 25% | 25% | 8% | -63% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 488.2 | 503 3% | 467 -4% | 346 -29% | 312 -36% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 471 | 498 6% | 460 -2% | 349 -26% | 314 -33% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 87 | 97 11% | 95 9% | 93 7% | 91 5% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.562 | 0.38 32% | 0.3 47% | ||
| Contrast (:1) | 869 | 1324 52% | 1557 79% | ||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.48 | 2.09 40% | 3.28 6% | 1.55 55% | 6.28 -80% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.01 | ||||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.06 | 2.12 31% | 1.89 38% | 2.05 33% | 8.24 -169% |
| Gamma | 2.4 92% | 2.27 97% | 2.21 100% | 2.15 102% | 2.12 104% |
| CCT | 6627 98% | 6621 98% | 6734 97% | 6267 104% | 8145 80% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 25% /
25% | 25% /
25% | 8% /
8% | -63% /
-63% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 21.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 6 ms rise | |
| ↘ 15.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 46 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.2 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 36.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 12.8 ms rise | |
| ↘ 23.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 51 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (31.6 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8111 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| Linpack Android / IOS | |
| Multi Thread | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge | |
| OnePlus 2 | |
| Xiaomi Mi 4s | |
| Motorola Moto X Play | |
| Bluboo Xtouch | |
| Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 | |
| Single Thread | |
| OnePlus 2 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge | |
| Xiaomi Mi 4s | |
| Motorola Moto X Play | |
| Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 | |
| Bluboo Xtouch | |
| PCMark for Android | |
| Computer Vision score | |
| Motorola Moto X Play | |
| Storage score | |
| Motorola Moto X Play | |
| Work 2.0 performance score | |
| Motorola Moto X Play | |
| Work performance score | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge | |
| Xiaomi Mi 4s | |
| OnePlus 2 | |
| Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 | |
| Motorola Moto X Play | |
| Bluboo Xtouch | |
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score | |
| OnePlus 2 | |
| Xiaomi Mi 4s | |
| Motorola Moto X Play | |
| Geekbench 3 | |
| 32 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge | |
| OnePlus 2 | |
| Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 | |
| 32 Bit Single-Core Score | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge | |
| OnePlus 2 | |
| Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge | |
| OnePlus 2 | |
| Xiaomi Mi 4s | |
| Bluboo Xtouch | |
| Motorola Moto X Play | |
| Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge | |
| Xiaomi Mi 4s | |
| OnePlus 2 | |
| Motorola Moto X Play | |
| Bluboo Xtouch | |
| Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 | |
| Google V8 Ver. 7 - Google V8 Ver. 7 Score | |
| Bluboo Xtouch | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge | |
| Xiaomi Mi 4s | |
| OnePlus 2 | |
| Motorola Moto X Play | |
| Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 | |
| Browsermark - 2.1 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge | |
| Xiaomi Mi 4s | |
| OnePlus 2 | |
| Motorola Moto X Play | |
| Bluboo Xtouch | |
| Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 | |
| Sunspider | |
| 1.0 Total Score | |
| Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 | |
| Bluboo Xtouch | |
| Motorola Moto X Play | |
| OnePlus 2 | |
| Xiaomi Mi 4s | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge | |
| 0.9.1 Total Score | |
| Bluboo Xtouch | |
| Xiaomi Mi 4s | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge | |
| Xiaomi Mi 4s | |
| OnePlus 2 | |
| Motorola Moto X Play | |
| Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 | |
| Bluboo Xtouch | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Bluboo Xtouch | |
| Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 | |
| Motorola Moto X Play | |
| OnePlus 2 | |
| Xiaomi Mi 4s | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge | |
| Xiaomi Mi 4s | |
| OnePlus 2 | |
| Motorola Moto X Play | |
| Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 | |
| Bluboo Xtouch | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
| Xiaomi Mi 4s | |
| OnePlus 2 | |
| Bluboo Xtouch | |
| Motorola Moto X Play | |
| Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 | |
| Vellamo 3.x | |
| Metal | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge | |
| OnePlus 2 | |
| Xiaomi Mi 4s | |
| Motorola Moto X Play | |
| Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 | |
| Bluboo Xtouch | |
| Multicore Beta | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge | |
| Xiaomi Mi 4s | |
| OnePlus 2 | |
| Bluboo Xtouch | |
| Motorola Moto X Play | |
| Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 | |
| Browser | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge | |
| Xiaomi Mi 4s | |
| OnePlus 2 | |
| Bluboo Xtouch | |
| Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 | |
| Motorola Moto X Play | |
| Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0 - --- | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge | |
| OnePlus 2 | |
| Xiaomi Mi 4s | |
| Bluboo Xtouch | |
| Motorola Moto X Play | |
| Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 | |
| Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 | |
| Smartbench 2012 | |
| Gaming Index | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge | |
| Xiaomi Mi 4s | |
| OnePlus 2 | |
| Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 | |
| Bluboo Xtouch | |
| Motorola Moto X Play | |
| Productivity Index | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge | |
| OnePlus 2 | |
| Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 | |
| Xiaomi Mi 4s | |
| Bluboo Xtouch | |
| Motorola Moto X Play | |
| PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 | |
| 3D Graphics Tests | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge | |
| Xiaomi Mi 4s | |
| OnePlus 2 | |
| Bluboo Xtouch | |
| Motorola Moto X Play | |
| Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 | |
| 2D Graphics Tests | |
| OnePlus 2 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge | |
| Xiaomi Mi 4s | |
| Bluboo Xtouch | |
| Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 | |
| Motorola Moto X Play | |
| Memory Tests | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge | |
| OnePlus 2 | |
| Xiaomi Mi 4s | |
| Bluboo Xtouch | |
| Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 | |
| Motorola Moto X Play | |
| Disk Tests | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge | |
| OnePlus 2 | |
| Xiaomi Mi 4s | |
| Bluboo Xtouch | |
| Motorola Moto X Play | |
| Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 | |
| CPU Tests | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge | |
| OnePlus 2 | |
| Bluboo Xtouch | |
| Xiaomi Mi 4s | |
| Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 | |
| Motorola Moto X Play | |
| System | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge | |
| Xiaomi Mi 4s | |
| OnePlus 2 | |
| Bluboo Xtouch | |
| Motorola Moto X Play | |
| Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 | |
* ... smaller is better
| 3DMark | |
| 1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Physics | |
| Xiaomi Mi 4s | |
| Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 | |
| HTC One A9 | |
| Bluboo Xtouch | |
| 1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Graphics | |
| Xiaomi Mi 4s | |
| HTC One A9 | |
| Bluboo Xtouch | |
| Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 | |
| 1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Score | |
| Xiaomi Mi 4s | |
| HTC One A9 | |
| Bluboo Xtouch | |
| Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 | |
| Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 Premium | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ | |
| Xiaomi Mi 4s | |
| Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 | |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.6 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.7 °C / 73 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
| Xiaomi Mi 4s Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 64 GB eMMC Flash | Google Nexus 5X Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash | Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL Adreno 306, 410 APQ8016, 16 GB eMMC Flash | HTC One A9 Adreno 405, 617 MSM8952, 16 GB eMMC Flash | OnePlus X Adreno 330, 801 MSM8974AA, 16 GB eMMC Flash | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 28% | 57% | 38% | 56% | |
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 1.4 | 0.55 61% | 0.5 64% | 0.9 36% | 0.6 57% |
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 2.15 | 1.44 33% | 0.9 58% | 1.2 44% | 0.91 58% |
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 2.33 | 1.9 18% | 1.1 53% | 1.4 40% | 1.12 52% |
| Load Average * (Watt) | 6.41 | 3.36 48% | 2.4 63% | 3.8 41% | 3.04 53% |
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 8.11 | 9.76 -20% | 4.3 47% | 5.9 27% | 3.2 61% |
* ... smaller is better
| Xiaomi Mi 4s 3260 mAh | Google Nexus 5X 2700 mAh | Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL 2070 mAh | HTC One A9 2150 mAh | OnePlus X 2525 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery runtime | 23% | -26% | -9% | 35% | |
| Reader / Idle (h) | 25 | 29.6 18% | 19.2 -23% | 16.1 -36% | |
| WiFi v1.3 (h) | 6.1 | 6.9 13% | 4.5 -26% | 6.1 0% | 9.2 51% |
| Load (h) | 3 | 4.1 37% | 2.9 -3% | 5.7 90% |
Pros
Cons
Mi 4s几乎没有什么缺陷。它的性能在主流手机中属于上乘,设计也给人以比它价位更高档的感觉。它的屏幕品质出色背光明亮,支持指纹识别、双SIM、MicroSD读卡器功能,与此同时整机保持了轻盈的重量。Mi 4s给人感觉十分全面,没有哪个方面让人失望。
但是,Mi 4s也有一些小遗憾,这些细节就是它售价低于高端机型近一半的原因所在。它的屏幕背光有些不均匀,而且我们的测试机在屏幕边缘和机身之间有个小空隙。辅助功能如NFC和无线充电它也没有支持,同时它的USB-C接口仅支持2.0标准。电池续航和机身温度都不糟糕,不过还有很大的改进空间。
300到350美元(约1952到2277人民币)的零售价则让它成为了Nexus 5X的直接竞争对手。Nexus更大更明亮的屏幕,更长的电池续航,更低的发热量,NFC,以及纯粹的安卓界面都是放弃小米而选择这台谷歌机型的理由。如果小米的设计,双SIM卡和microSD卡槽功能对你来说更有吸引力的话,那么选择Mi 4s就毋庸置疑。
这是一台设计美观,功能全面均衡的智能手机。在一些方面它相比其他主流手机略弱,给了竞争对手可乘之机。
注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里。
Xiaomi Mi 4s
- 04/21/2016 v5.1 (old)
Allen Ngo



























