Notebookcheck Logo
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+ in review

三星Galaxy S10 FE+ 评测：Android 大型平板电脑，注重价格，运行时间超长

更接近Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra。

Galaxy Tab S10 FE Plus 专为学生和休闲用户设计。除了 13.1 英寸显示屏外，三星Galaxy Tab S10 FE+ 平板电脑还配备了 S Pen 和人工智能功能，给人留下了深刻印象。在本评测中，我们将探讨 FE 机型与Galaxy Tab S10 Plus 相比是否更值得购买。
Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Android Tablet Galaxy Tab Touchscreen

结论：Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra 的优点与若干缺点

总的来说，三星Galaxy Tab S10 FE+ 是一款尺寸大、电池续航时间长、外形美观的平板电脑。这些特点与多功能 S Pen 相结合，使其成为大学或学校的有趣伴侣。IP 防护等级还可确保防水防尘，从而提高了外出时的耐用性。

不过，Galaxy Tab S10 Fe+ 也并非没有一些值得注意的地方。最大的批评点是三星平板电脑的性能，它并不完全令人信服。对于那些期望 Tab S10 FE+ 的价格具有较高系统性能的用户来说，这可能是一个决定性的淘汰标准。

就售价而言，该产品在功能方面的其他不足还包括充电速度慢或仅有一个 USB 2.0 端口。

尽管如此，Galaxy Tab S10 FE+ 上市后不久就出现了大幅降价，现在这款平板电脑的价格不到 600 欧元或 600 美元。

如果您正在寻找替代产品，Oppo Pad 4 Pro 是一个强有力的竞争者，也是一款整体性能更好的平板电脑。

Pros

+ 触感舒适
+ 电池续航时间长
+ IP 防护等级和 microSD 支持
+ 更新周期长
+ 几乎没有节流

Cons

- 性能不令人信服
- 显示屏可以更亮
- 充电速度慢
- 只有 USB 2.0
- 基本型号只有 128 GB 存储空间

价格和供应情况

三星Galaxy Tab S10 FE+ Wi-Fi 版在德国亚马逊（Amazon.de）或直接从制造商处购买，零售价为 749 欧元。如果您需要 5G 蜂窝连接，则需支付 100 欧元的附加费。

该平板电脑的测试配置也可从美国亚马逊购买，售价为 599.99 美元。

Amazon Logo
$485.57
SAMSUNG Galaxy Tab S10 FE 128GB WiFi Android Tablet, Large Display, Long Battery Life, Powerful Processor, S Pen, Expandable Storage, US Version, 2025, 2 Yr Manufacturer Warranty, Silver
  • $369.59
    SAMSUNG Galaxy Tab S10 FE w/S-Pen (128GB, 8GB, WiFi) 10.9” 90Hz Full HD Android Tablet, Octa-core (4nm), 4K Camera, IP68 Water Resistant SM-X520 (Gray)
  • $489.99
    Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+ Plus w/S-Pen | 128GB, 8GB RAM, Wi-Fi Only | 13.1" LCD, WiFi 6E Android 15 Tablet, 4K Camera | International Model X620 | 25W Fast Charger Bundle (Gray)
Bestpreis 567 € handy24.de
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+ X620, Gray, 8GB RAM, 128GB Flash (SM-X620NZAR)
2. 569 € Alternate
3. 571.84 € electronis.de
4. 571.85 € Jacob Elektronik direkt

三星Galaxy Tab S10 FE+ 的显示屏尺寸为 13.1 英寸，是迄今为止Galaxy Tab S FE 系列中最大的显示屏；它比 Galaxy Tab S9 FE+大 0.7 英寸。

三星表示，与 S Pen 相结合，Tab S10 FE+ 有可能成为学校的终极学习伙伴和智能学习伴侣。

除了大屏幕之外，Galaxy Tab S10 Fe+ 的人工智能功能也给人留下了深刻印象，这些功能旨在简化学生和休闲用户的生活。

三星Galaxy Tab S10 FE+ 的规格

Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+ (Galaxy Tab S10 Series)
Processor
Samsung Exynos 1580 8 x 2 - 2.9 GHz
Graphics adapter
Samsung Xclipse 540
Memory
8 GB 
, LPDDR5
Display
13.10 inch 16:10, 2880 x 1800 pixel 259 PPI, capacitive Touchscreen, native pen support, TFT-LCD, Corning Gorilla Glass 3, glossy: yes, HDR, 90 Hz
Storage
128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 105 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: USB-C, Card Reader: microSD (microSDXC, up to 2TB, eXFAT), 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: hall, accelerometer, gyro, proximity, OTG, Miracast
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.3, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 6 x 300.6 x 194.7
Battery
10090 mAh Lithium-Ion
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 15
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix (AF, 4K30 @ 30 fps), camera2 API: Limited
Secondary Camera: 12 MPix (FF)
Additional features
Speakers: stereo speaker, Keyboard: Onscreen, USB cable, S Pen, info material, One UI 7.0, 24 Months Warranty, Single-Band-GNSS: GLONASS, Galileo, Beidou, QZSS, GPS, DRM Widevine L1, HDR: HDR10, HLG, fanless, waterproof
Weight
664 g
Price
789 Euro
Links
Samsung notebook section
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

外壳高质量 IP68 防护等级

三星Galaxy Tab S10 FE+ 颜色选择
三星Galaxy Tab S10 FE+ 颜色选择

Galaxy Tab S10 FE+ 并不是市场上最薄、最轻的平板电脑。尽管如此，由回收铝制成的一体式机身外壳散发出高品质的外观和质感，整体做工手感极佳。磨砂铝表面还确保几乎看不到指纹。

显示屏约占平板电脑正面的 85%，给人一种非常现代的感觉。不过，考虑到高昂的售价，13.1 英寸显示屏周围的边框可以再窄一些。

该平板电脑通过了 IP68 保护认证，可以防止灰尘和水的侵入。这意味着Galaxy Tab S10 FE+ 也可以在户外小雨中使用，而无需担心。

尺寸比较

❌
300.6 mm 194.7 mm 6 mm 664 g290.9 mm 188.3 mm 6.69 mm 640 g289.6 mm 209.6 mm 5.97 mm 675 g285.4 mm 185.4 mm 5.6 mm 571 g297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

功能：Android 大型平板电脑的 USB 2.0 功能令人失望

与 Galaxy Tab S10+Tab S10 FE+ 只提供一个 USB 2.0 端口，这意味着虽然支持 USB OTG，但无法与显示器进行有线连接。

在测试过程中，我们使用三星 980 Pro（M.2 固态硬盘）的传输速度仅为 36 MB/s。连接的存储介质可以格式化为 NTFS（只读模式）或 exFAT，以便顺利使用。

Galaxy Tab S10 FE+ 没有配备 NFC，但据制造商称，它提供了三星的安全平台 Knox，可以保护用户的敏感信息。

microSD 读卡器

结合我们的 Angelbird V60 参考卡，Tab S10 FE+ 可提供稳定的复制速度，尽管 Tab S10+的表现要好得多。在 CPDT 基准测试中，Tab S10 FE+ 的 microSD 性能更好。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
47.52 MB/s +92%
Average of class Tablet
  (7.61 - 58.4, n=59, last 2 years)
35.1 MB/s +42%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+
Samsung Exynos 1580 (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
24.76 MB/s

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

0102030405060708090100Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+ Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø35.1 (26-50.5)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+ Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø33.3 (23.7-41.8)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+ Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø75.9 (40.4-107.5)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+ Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø57.5 (44.7-71.3)

软件： Galaxy Tab S10 FE+ 长期更新

Galaxy Tab S10 FE+ 是 FE 系列中第一款使用人工智能功能（如 Circle to Search）的机型，Tab S10 FE 除外。三星目前正在推广 "笔记 "应用，其中包括一个数学助手，用于解决学生的数学问题。

这款平板电脑运行的是Android 15，上面分层是内部用户界面 OneUI 7.0。在测试时，Android 安全补丁是截至 2025 年 5 月的最新版本。

据三星称，该平板电脑将提供总共七年的更新，包括操作系统和安全补丁。

OneUI 7：主屏幕
OneUI 7：主屏幕
设置页面
设置页面
快速设置
快速设置

可持续性

由于Galaxy Tab S10 FE+ 尚未列入三星的可持续发展报告，因此无法获得有关该产品的具体信息。

与 Galaxy Tab S10+类似，制造商可能也使用了由可回收材料制成的部件。包装由纸张制成。

通信和全球导航卫星系统：可选 5G，但无 Wi-Fi 7

Galaxy Tab S10 FE+ 只提供 Wi-Fi 6 连接，而不是更先进的 Wi-Fi 7，这意味着无法使用 6 GHz 频段实现更高的传输速度。

我们使用华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 路由器在 5 GHz 频段上实现了约 800 Mb/s的传输速度，还算不错。

除了 Wi-Fi 版本，三星还为Galaxy Tab S10 FE+ 提供了 5G SKU。后者可以将 nanoSIM 卡与 eSIM 卡结合使用。这两款机型都可以进行位置跟踪。

Networking
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
780 (min: 711) MBit/s ∼78%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
829 (min: 431) MBit/s ∼48%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
878 (min: 807) MBit/s ∼88%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1723 (min: 1322) MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
994 (min: 974) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
956 (min: 844) MBit/s ∼55%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1759 (min: 1709) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1782 (min: 936) MBit/s ∼100%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1598 (min: 1108) MBit/s ∼91%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
960 (min: 700) MBit/s ∼54%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
846 (min: 305) MBit/s ∼85%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
822 (min: 234) MBit/s ∼48%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1195 (min: 417) MBit/s ∼68%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1250 (min: 743) MBit/s ∼70%
Average of class Tablet
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
548 (min: 10.5) MBit/s ∼55%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
572 (min: 20.1) MBit/s ∼33%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1226 (min: 578) MBit/s ∼70%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1400 (min: 746) MBit/s ∼79%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950100010501100115012001250130013501400145015001550160016501700Tooltip
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz: Ø1598 (1108-1731)
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz: Ø960 (700-1188)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+ 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø780 (711-806)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+ 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø814 (431-879)
楼内定位
楼内定位
户外定位
户外定位

在室外，需要等待很长时间才能确定位置，精确度仅为 18 米。在使用 Garmin Venu 2 进行的导航测试中，Galaxy Tab S10 FE+ 的表现非常出色。不过，三星平板电脑有时确定的位置与实际路线略有偏差。

导航： Galaxy Tab S10 FE+ 与 Garmin Venu 2 的对比
导航： Galaxy Tab S10 FE+ 与 Garmin Venu 2 的对比

摄像头 Galaxy Tab S10 FE+ 配备 1300 万像素后置单摄像头

与Galaxy Tab S10 FE+ 自拍
与Galaxy Tab S10 FE+ 自拍

集成在显示屏上部的 1200 万像素定焦摄像头在日光下也能提供出色的效果。不过，配备自动对焦功能和 1300 万像素图像传感器的主摄像头所提供的照片效果要稍好一些。

色彩还原和动态范围都不错。不过，清晰度还可以再高一些。我们在人造光源下进行的色彩分析表明没有明显偏差。

1x
1x
2 倍变焦
2 倍变焦
8 倍变焦（最大值）
8 倍变焦（最大值）
Galaxy Tab S10 FE+：相机界面
Galaxy Tab S10 FE+：相机界面
Galaxy Tab S10 FE+：相机界面
Galaxy Tab S10 FE+：相机界面

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main CameraMain CameraLow light5x Zoom
ColorChecker
8.1 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
10.9 ∆E
11.7 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
10 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
11.6 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+: 7.79 ∆E min: 2.92 - max: 11.69 ∆E
ColorChecker
29.1 ∆E
52.3 ∆E
39.8 ∆E
34.6 ∆E
44.8 ∆E
59.4 ∆E
51.8 ∆E
35.2 ∆E
41.8 ∆E
29 ∆E
62.4 ∆E
62.5 ∆E
29.4 ∆E
46.1 ∆E
36.2 ∆E
72.9 ∆E
43.3 ∆E
41.6 ∆E
79.5 ∆E
69.1 ∆E
51.6 ∆E
36.9 ∆E
23.8 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+: 45.27 ∆E min: 13.35 - max: 79.51 ∆E

配件和保修：包装盒内无电源适配器

Galaxy Tab S10 FE+：超薄书套
Galaxy Tab S10 FE+：超薄书套

Galaxy Tab S10 FE+ 随附 S Pen 和 USB 数据线。配套的电源适配器、Book Cover Keyboard 和 Book Cover Keyboard Slim 或 Slim Cover 可在三星网上商店单独购买。

三星提供 保修Galaxy Tab S10 FE+ 的保修期为 24 个月，还可以购买 Care+ 保险套餐，价格为 129 欧元。

输入设备和操作：S Pen 和电源按钮上的指纹传感器

无论是使用触摸屏还是 S Pen，Galaxy Tab S10 FE+ 的 90 Hz 触摸屏都能精确快速地响应输入。13.1 英寸的大屏幕让使用触控笔手写笔记变得轻而易举，即使快速移动，屏幕上的笔画也几乎不会落后于触控笔笔尖。未安装触觉振动电机。

三星在机身顶部的电源按钮上集成了主动式指纹传感器。存储的指纹识别非常可靠。此外，还可以通过前置摄像头进行 2D 面部识别。不过，这种验证方法的安全性较低。

默认浏览器：纵向模式
默认浏览器：纵向模式
默认浏览器：横向模式
默认浏览器：横向模式

显示屏：90 Hz LCD，无 PWM

LC 显示屏采用经典的 RGB 子像素矩阵，由一个红色、一个蓝色和一个绿色发光二极管组成
LC 显示屏采用经典的 RGB 子像素矩阵，由一个红色、一个蓝色和一个绿色发光二极管组成

Galaxy Tab S10 FE+ 虽然没有采用 AMOLED 面板，但它的 LCD 完全没有使用 PWM，这一点会让敏感用户感到满意。在经典的 16:10 宽高比下，面板的刷新率为 90 Hz，像素密度为 259 PPI。

在高亮度模式下，白色背景下的画面亮度非常接近出厂规格，高达 800 尼特。不过，在 APL18 测试中，我们测得的亮度值为 585 尼特，明显低于日常使用和播放 HDR 资料时的亮度值（583 尼特）。

因此，三星平板电脑面板的高对比度效果非常有限。

715
cd/m²		755
cd/m²		789
cd/m²
708
cd/m²		779
cd/m²		756
cd/m²
738
cd/m²		752
cd/m²		764
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 789 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 750.7 cd/m² Minimum: 2.45 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 779 cd/m²
Contrast: 1812:1 (Black: 0.43 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.84
ΔE Greyscale 2.7 | 0.09-98 Ø5.1
96.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.2
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+
TFT-LCD, 2880x1800, 13.1"		Oppo Pad 4 Pro
LTPS LCD, 3392x2400, 13.2"		Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 2800x1752, 12.4"		Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
IPS, 2944x1840, 12.7"
Screen
-12%
-23%
-24%
Brightness middle
779
672
-14%
471
-40%
726
-7%
Brightness
751
652
-13%
473
-37%
691
-8%
Brightness Distribution
90
93
3%
97
8%
91
1%
Black Level *
0.43
0.46
-7%
0.55
-28%
Contrast
1812
1461
-19%
1320
-27%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.9
3.18
-67%
3.1
-63%
4.67
-146%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
5
4.84
3%
5.8
-16%
5.6
-12%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.7
2.2
19%
2.4
11%
1.8
33%
Gamma
2.2 100%
2.396 92%
2.06 107%
2.249 98%
CCT
6923 94%
7070 92%
6746 96%
6382 102%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8363 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

使用 Portrait Displays 的 Calman Ultimate 软件和 X-Rite i1Pro 3 分光光度计对色彩偏差进行分析后，Tab S10 FE+ 面板的出厂校准结果令人满意，符合 DeltaE 2000 <3 的目标范围。

0.43 cd/m² 的黑色值确保了日常使用中 1:1,812 的良好测量对比度。

灰度（轮廓：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
灰度（轮廓：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
ColorChecker （轮廓：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
ColorChecker （轮廓：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩空间（轮廓：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩空间（轮廓：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
饱和度扫描（轮廓：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
饱和度扫描（轮廓：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
19.19 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5.349 ms rise
↘ 13.84 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 40 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.5 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
38.71 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 10.12 ms rise
↘ 28.59 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 56 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.1 ms).

视角稳定。在室外，LC 显示屏提供了足够的亮度，适合在阴凉处使用。不过，玻璃表面的反光令人讨厌。

户外观赏
户外观赏
户外观赏
户外观赏
稳定的视角
稳定的视角
稳定的视角
稳定的视角

性能Exynos 1580 难以跟上竞争对手的步伐

与 Tab S9 FE+一样，目前的 Tab S10 FE+ 系列也采用了内部 SoC。该平板电脑采用 Exynos 1580SoC Galaxy A56 5G因此被定位为中端性能产品。

与 骁龙 8 精英版的 OPPO Pad 4 Pro，Tab S10 FE+ 的 Exynos 1580 则远远落后。这同样适用于 Xclipse 540GPU 在 GFXBench 4K Aztec Ruins 测试中仅达到 10 fps。

在日常使用中，Galaxy Tab S10 FE+ 的运行并不总是很流畅，One UI 界面有时会出现问题，不过它仍然可以允许应用程序在后台更新。

我们无法确定 Exynos 1580 是否达到了 1800p 高分辨率的极限，或者是否存在优化不足的问题。 Galaxy A56我们倾向于前者。

Geekbench 6.4 | PCMark for Android | BaseMark OS II | UL Procyon AI Inference for Android | AImark | Geekbench AI
Geekbench 6.4
Single-Core
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
3188 Points +133%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
2213 Points +62%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
2167 Points +58%
Average Samsung Exynos 1580
  (1367 - 1380, n=3)
1372 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+
Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 8192
1368 Points
Average of class Tablet
  (185 - 3715, n=92, last 2 years)
1230 Points -10%
Multi-Core
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
9218 Points +135%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
7094 Points +81%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
6723 Points +71%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+
Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 8192
3921 Points
Average of class Tablet
  (493 - 14690, n=92, last 2 years)
3916 Points 0%
Average Samsung Exynos 1580
  (3890 - 3921, n=3)
3911 Points 0%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
17967 Points +37%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
16684 Points +27%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
14862 Points +14%
Average Samsung Exynos 1580
  (13094 - 14298, n=3)
13579 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+
Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 8192
13094 Points
Average of class Tablet
  (3195 - 25683, n=82, last 2 years)
10923 Points -17%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
11606 Points +94%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
10865 Points +81%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
10498 Points +75%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+
Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 8192
5989 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 1580
  (5881 - 6058, n=3)
5976 Points 0%
Average of class Tablet
  (195 - 11721, n=67, last 2 years)
4858 Points -19%
System
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
15736 Points +59%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
15124 Points +53%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
14858 Points +50%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+
Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 8192
9894 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 1580
  (9765 - 10013, n=3)
9891 Points 0%
Average of class Tablet
  (904 - 16435, n=67, last 2 years)
7972 Points -19%
Memory
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
11834 Points +56%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
11132 Points +47%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
10633 Points +41%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+
Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 8192
7563 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 1580
  (6960 - 7563, n=3)
7359 Points -3%
Average of class Tablet
  (401 - 17036, n=67, last 2 years)
5696 Points -25%
Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
57192 Points +447%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
42342 Points +305%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
33602 Points +221%
Average of class Tablet
  (418 - 57192, n=67, last 2 years)
11405 Points +9%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+
Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 8192
10461 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 1580
  (10293 - 10461, n=3)
10358 Points -1%
Web
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
2056 Points +24%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
2007 Points +21%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
1938 Points +17%
Average Samsung Exynos 1580
  (1659 - 1730, n=3)
1698 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+
Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 8192
1659 Points
Average of class Tablet
  (10 - 2273, n=67, last 2 years)
1369 Points -17%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
74821 Points +621%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
17975 Points +73%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
17934 Points +73%
Average of class Tablet
  (2597 - 74821, n=65, last 2 years)
12174 Points +17%
Average Samsung Exynos 1580
  (10372 - 11181, n=3)
10765 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+
Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 8192
10372 Points
AImark - Score v3.x
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
54948 Points +6194%
Average of class Tablet
  (138 - 156427, n=56, last 2 years)
6781 Points +677%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1458 Points +67%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
1236 Points +42%
Average Samsung Exynos 1580
  (873 - 926, n=2)
900 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+
Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 8192
873 Points
Geekbench AI
Quantized TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2
Average of class Tablet
  (130 - 4532, n=14, last 2 years)
1185 Points +83%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1108 Points +72%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+
Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 8192
646 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 1580
  (646 - 646, n=2)
646 Points 0%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
589 Points -9%
Half Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2
Average of class Tablet
  (84 - 4545, n=14, last 2 years)
887 Points +220%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
480 Points +73%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
278 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+
Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 8192
277 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 1580
  (276 - 277, n=2)
277 Points 0%
Single Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
480 Points +74%
Average of class Tablet
  (85 - 1140, n=14, last 2 years)
419 Points +52%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
298 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+
Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 8192
276 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 1580
  (276 - 276, n=2)
276 Points 0%
3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6637 Points +373%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5289 Points +277%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4514 Points +222%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1404 Points
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6683 Points +370%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5236 Points +268%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4742 Points +233%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1422 Points
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
25482 Points +412%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
18352 Points +269%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4975 Points
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +46%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
82 fps
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -27%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -27%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
767 fps +392%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
713 fps +357%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
498 fps +219%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
156 fps
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +131%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps +15%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps +15%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
52 fps
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
494 fps +345%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
325 fps +193%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
261 fps +135%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
111 fps
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
115 fps +229%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps +71%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps +71%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
35 fps
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
331 fps +289%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
240 fps +182%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
219 fps +158%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
85 fps
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
78 fps +311%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
59 fps +211%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
49 fps +158%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
19 fps
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
204 fps +325%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
137 fps +185%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
135 fps +181%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
48 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
67 fps +347%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
54 fps +260%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
45 fps +200%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
15 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
98 fps +326%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
72 fps +213%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
67 fps +191%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
23 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
91 fps +279%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps +150%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
50 fps +108%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
24 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
252 fps +350%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
176 fps +214%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
167 fps +198%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
56 fps
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
44 fps +344%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
35 fps +254%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
30 fps +203%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9.9 fps
Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | Speedometer 3.0 | WebXPRT 4 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total Score
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus (Chrome 132)
231.7 Points
Oppo Pad 4 Pro (Chrome 135)
200.378 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+ (Chrome 130)
177.483 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 1580 (n=1)
151.6 Points
Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 393, n=74, last 2 years)
129.1 Points
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus (Chrome 132)
294 runs/min
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+ (Chrome 130)
256 runs/min
Average Samsung Exynos 1580 (191 - 194, n=2)
192.5 runs/min
Average of class Tablet (2.59 - 572, n=66, last 2 years)
154.9 runs/min
Speedometer 3.0 - Score
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus (Chrome 132)
17.2 runs/min +40%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro (Chrome 135)
16.5 runs/min +34%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+ (Chrome 130)
15.2 runs/min +24%
Average of class Tablet (1.25 - 34.4, n=46, last 2 years)
13.8 runs/min +12%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+ (Chrome 137)
12.3 runs/min
Average Samsung Exynos 1580 (12 - 12.3, n=3)
12.2 runs/min -1%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+ (Chrome 130)
190 Points +32%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro (Chrome 135)
176 Points +22%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus (Chrome 132)
164 Points +14%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+ (Chrome 137)
144 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 1580 (138 - 144, n=3)
140 Points -3%
Average of class Tablet (21 - 315, n=76, last 2 years)
119.8 Points -17%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus (Chrome 132)
70252 Points +42%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+ (Chrome 130)
67938 Points +38%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro (Chrome 135)
57389 Points +16%
Average Samsung Exynos 1580 (49327 - 50864, n=3)
50303 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+ (Chrome 137)
49327 Points
Average of class Tablet (763 - 111219, n=99, last 2 years)
35348 Points -28%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=85, last 2 years)
3200 ms * -276%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+ (Chrome 137)
851.2 ms *
Average Samsung Exynos 1580 (791 - 851, n=3)
812 ms * +5%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro (Chrome 135)
666.6 ms * +22%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+ (Chrome 130)
639.3 ms * +25%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus (Chrome 132)
579.9 ms * +32%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+Oppo Pad 4 ProSamsung Galaxy Tab S10+Lenovo Yoga Tab PlusAverage 128 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5
112%
35%
94%
-3%
-8%
Sequential Read 256KB
1686.77
3801.54
125%
3574.3
112%
3868
129%
1581 ?(529 - 3134, n=65)
-6%
1326 ?(126.9 - 3984, n=82, last 2 years)
-21%
Sequential Write 256KB
999.78
3334.62
234%
554.67
-45%
3047.6
205%
742 ?(233 - 1332, n=65)
-26%
936 ?(78.2 - 3484, n=82, last 2 years)
-6%
Random Read 4KB
228.91
297.28
30%
218.43
-5%
241.2
5%
242 ?(126.2 - 428, n=65)
6%
210 ?(20.1 - 474, n=82, last 2 years)
-8%
Random Write 4KB
211.53
335.89
59%
374.09
77%
290.9
38%
238 ?(61.8 - 503, n=65)
13%
216 ?(8.23 - 668, n=82, last 2 years)
2%

排放：未观察到明显的节流现象

温度

除了热点区域外，大面积散热区域和中档 SoC 确保了即使在负载情况下也能保持舒适的机箱温度。在 3DMark 压力测试中，废热几乎不会降低系统性能。

Max. Load
 40.5 °C45.4 °C31 °C 
 30.1 °C30.1 °C28.6 °C 
 29.1 °C28.9 °C29.5 °C 
Maximum: 45.4 °C
Average: 32.6 °C
31.6 °C33.7 °C36.8 °C
29.8 °C30.2 °C31.9 °C
28.5 °C29 °C29.2 °C
Maximum: 36.8 °C
Average: 31.2 °C
Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.6 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.4 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.8 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
99.7 % +6%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
94.1 %
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
82.9 % -12%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
63.2 % -33%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
98 %
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
83.3 % -15%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
81.8 % -17%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
59.5 % -39%
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+ Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø8.3 (8.2-8.38)
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø23.7 (22.2-27.1)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+ Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø27.6 (26.3-27.9)
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø60.4 (60.3-60.5)
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø22.7 (22.1-24.2)
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø10.8 (10.4-12.1)
保暖衣顶部
保暖衣顶部
保暖衣下身
保暖衣下身

扬声器

Galaxy Tab 的立体声扬声器提供了良好的音频体验，低音轻盈，中音突出。

与 Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra相比，扬声器似乎缺乏深度。有线耳机可以通过 USB 端口连接，蓝牙 5.3 也可以通过无线方式连接，尽管只有少数几种音频编解码器。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2040.833.22530.129.43126.726.14027.826.65035.933.26328.326.48028.834.210027.344.612517.249.616016.35920014.759.625012.860.431513.263.340012.663.550012.367.763012.271.580012.172.7100012.375125012.376.3160012.177.420001275.2250012.274.731501376.4400013.176.3500013.174.5630013.568.3800013.467.81000013.465.31250013.554.71600013.352.1SPL2586.4N0.667.6median 13.1median 67.8Delta1.77.744.24338.738.437.735.138.933.837.237.125.526.819.527.918.742.520.452.618.858.818.164.415.666.815.76814.767.216.269.820.171.119.176.518.378.815.379.913.578.213.674.612.773.71367.212.46712.570.512.374.512.576.412.576.812.466.911.872.527.187.30.973.2median 14.7median 71.12.64.5hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+ audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 27% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 17% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 6% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

能源消耗：整体效率低，充电速度慢

Galaxy Tab S10 FE+ 的耗电量明显高于 OPPO Pad 4 Pro的功耗明显高于 Oppo Pad 4 Pro，而且整体效率不高。

电池容量为 10,090 mAh，最大充电功率为 45 W。 小米移动电源 25000需要近 2 个小时，时间相当长。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.13 / 0.39 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.19 / 6.06 / 6.07 Watt
Load midlight 11.45 / 15.65 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+
10090 mAh		Oppo Pad 4 Pro
12140 mAh		Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
10090 mAh		Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
10200 mAh		Average Samsung Exynos 1580
 		Average of class Tablet
 
Power Consumption
37%
-25%
18%
24%
9%
Idle Minimum *
1.19
1.5
-26%
3.05
-156%
1.5
-26%
1.337 ?(0.72 - 2.1, n=3)
-12%
1.828 ?(0.63 - 4.66, n=77, last 2 years)
-54%
Idle Average *
6.06
1.8
70%
4.57
25%
1.8
70%
3.34 ?(1.45 - 6.06, n=3)
45%
3.77 ?(1 - 9.2, n=77, last 2 years)
38%
Idle Maximum *
6.07
2.2
64%
4.65
23%
2.3
62%
3.49 ?(1.49 - 6.07, n=3)
43%
4.25 ?(1.3 - 15.3, n=77, last 2 years)
30%
Load Average *
11.45
5.8
49%
13.35
-17%
11.1
3%
8.98 ?(5.8 - 11.5, n=3)
22%
9.45 ?(2.5 - 34.9, n=77, last 2 years)
17%
Load Maximum *
15.65
11.4
27%
15.55
1%
18.5
-18%
12.3 ?(7.9 - 15.7, n=3)
21%
13.3 ?(4.6 - 46.7, n=77, last 2 years)
15%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

0123456789101112131415Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+ Samsung Exynos 1580; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø5.98 (2.35-11.9)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+ MediaTek Dimensity 9300+; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø11.2 (3.96-15.6)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+ Samsung Exynos 1580; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø2.35 (2.32-2.5)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+ MediaTek Dimensity 9300+; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø3.96 (3.83-6.24)

Power consumption: GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

0123456789101112131415Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+ Samsung Exynos 1580; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø7.88 (7.46-8.84)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+ MediaTek Dimensity 9300+; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø13.9 (6.62-15.2)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+ Samsung Exynos 1580; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø2.35 (2.32-2.5)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+ MediaTek Dimensity 9300+; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø3.96 (3.83-6.24)

电池寿命

在亮度为 150 cd/m² 的实际电池测试中，Galaxy Tab S10 FE+ 的运行时间对于一款大型Android 平板电脑来说非常出色，WLAN 上网时间接近 19 小时。

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 137)
18h 56min
Battery Runtime - WiFi v1.3
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+
10090 mAh
1136 min
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
12140 mAh
1077 min
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
10090 mAh
502 min
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
10200 mAh
768 min

Notebookcheck 对三星Galaxy Tab S10 FE+ 的总体印象

三星Galaxy Tab S10 FE+ 兼具大屏幕、长更新周期和笔支持功能。它的价格明显低于 Ultra 机型，可能会吸引学生和休闲用户。

Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+ - 06/16/2025 v8
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis
89 / 98 → 91%
Keyboard
71 / 80 → 89%
Pointing Device
93%
Connectivity
48 / 69 → 70%
Weight
81 / 40-88 → 84%
Battery
92%
Display
85%
Games Performance
20 / 65 → 31%
Application Performance
64 / 92 → 69%
AI Performance
19%
Temperature
91%
Noise
100%
Audio
84 / 91 → 93%
Camera
55 / 90 → 61%
Average
68%
82%
Tablet - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
50%
Packaging
75%
Power Use
92.6%
Repairability
60%
Software Updates
100%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 62.9%

Potential competitors in comparison

Image
Model / Review
Price
Weight
Drive
Display
1.
81.8%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+
Samsung Exynos 1580 ⎘
Samsung Xclipse 540 ⎘
8 GB Memory, 128 GB 		Amazon:
1. $485.57
SAMSUNG Galaxy Tab S10 FE 12...
2. $369.59
SAMSUNG Galaxy Tab S10 FE w/...
3. $489.99
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+ P...
List Price: 789€		664 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash13.10"
2880x1800
259 PPI
TFT-LCD
2.
87.3%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB 		Amazon:
1. $11.90
YANMONGI 1 Pack Screen Prote...
2. $14.90
YANMONGI 2 Pack Screen Prote...
3. $14.88
for Oppo Pad 4 Pro 13.2 Inch...
List Price: 587€		675 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash13.20"
3392x2400
315 PPI
LTPS LCD
3.
85.2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ ⎘
ARM Immortalis-G720 MP12 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB 		Amazon:
1. $849.00
SAMSUNG Galaxy Tab S10+ Plus...
2. $485.57
SAMSUNG Galaxy Tab S10 FE 12...
3. $179.99
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Table...
List Price: 1119€		571 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash12.40"
2800x1752
266 PPI
Dynamic AMOLED 2X
4.
86.4%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 750 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB 		Amazon:
1. $729.49
Lenovo - Yoga Tab Plus - 12....
2. $257.00
Lenovo Tab Plus - 2024 - Pre...
3. $54.99
Keyboard Case Touch for Leno...
List Price: 799€		640 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash12.70"
2944x1840
273 PPI
IPS

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 三星Galaxy S10 FE+ 评测：Android 大型平板电脑，注重价格，运行时间超长
Marcus Herbrich, 2025-06-25 (Update: 2025-06-25)