Notebookcheck Logo

三星Galaxy A15 5G 智能手机评测--经济型手机的重要更新

紧凑型灯塔。 如果您正在寻找一款具有 5G 功能的经济型智能手机,那么您可能会遇到Galaxy A15 5G。三星试图通过赋予手机许多新功能来保持其与时俱进。与竞争对手相比,它是成功了还是变化不大?请阅读我们的评测,一探究竟。
5G Android ARM Smartphone Touchscreen

Galaxy A15 5G 是三星最便宜的手机型号之一。目前,您可以从制造商处以约 200 美元的价格买到这款手机。尽管价格相对较低,但这款智能手机配备了 5G 调制解调器,因此您甚至可以使用最先进的蜂窝标准。

它的前身 Galaxy A14 5G一年前,A14 5G 就已经是一款非常有趣的智能手机了:它现在配备了 AMOLED 屏幕,并首次安装了超广角摄像头。

升级非常重要,因为竞争对手(如摩托罗拉或小米)从未停止过竞争,现在已经向市场推出了一些非常令人印象深刻的机型。因此,现在我们将回答这个问题:三星Galaxy A15 5G 的新功能是否又具有竞争力?让我们开始吧。

Samsung Galaxy A15 5G (Galaxy A10 Series)
Processor
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+ 8 x 2 - 2.2 GHz, Cortex-A76 / A55
Graphics adapter
Memory
4 GB 
Display
6.50 inch 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixel 396 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, AMOLED, glossy: yes, 90 Hz
Storage
128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 128 GB 
, 102 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5mm audio port, Card Reader: microSD (shared, up to 1TB), 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: acceleration sensor, gyroscope, light sensor, compass
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.3, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B2/​B4/​B5/​B8), 4G (B1/​B2/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B12/​B17/​B20/​B28/​B38/​B40/​B41/​B66), 5G (n1/​n3/​n7/​n8/​n20/​n28/​n38/​n40/​n41/​n77/​n78) , Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.4 x 160.1 x 76.8
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Ion, 25 Watt charging
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 14
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix f/​1.8, phase comparison-AF, LED-flash, Videos @1080p/​30fps (Camera 1); 5.0MP, f/​2.2, wide angle lens (Camera 2); 2.0MP, f/​2.4, macro lens (Camera 3)
Secondary Camera: 13 MPix f/​2.0
Additional features
USB cable, SIM tool, 24 Months Warranty, SAR: 0.796W/​kg Head, 1.461W/​kg Body, fanless
Weight
200 g
Price
230 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
80.1 %
03/2024
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G
Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2
200 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.50"2340x1080
79.4 %
05/2023
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2
202 g64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.60"2408x1080
81.9 %
03/2024
Motorola Moto G34
SD 695 5G, Adreno 619
179 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.50"1600x720
78.3 %
08/2023
Nokia G42
SD 480+, Adreno 619
194 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.56"1612x720
81.7 %
06/2023
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
SD 4 Gen 1, Adreno 619
189 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.67"2400x1080

首先,我们来看看它的外壳:与 Galaxy A14 5G相比,A14 5G 的屏幕纵横比为 19.5:9,略显紧凑。屏幕周围的边框依然清晰可见,但对于一款售价在 200 美元左右的手机来说,这已经很不错了。

三星为手机背面提供了深蓝、浅蓝和黄色等多种颜色,其中磨砂背面在光线下总是闪闪发光。指纹痕迹和灰尘在使用很短时间后就会清晰可见,因此需要定期清洁或使用保护套。手机边框也是由塑料制成的,但即便如此,它的结构还是很稳定,抗压性也很好。手机壳在扭动时几乎不会变形,但时不时会发出嘎吱声。

材料过渡干净利落,边缘圆润。三个相机镜头都是独立的,分别位于背面左侧的下方。它们明显突出于机壳,因此当手机放在桌面上使用触摸屏时会略微倾斜。

尺寸比较

167.7 mm 78 mm 9.1 mm 202 g165.9 mm 76.2 mm 8 mm 189 g165 mm 75.8 mm 8.6 mm 194 g162.7 mm 74.7 mm 8.2 mm 179 g160.1 mm 76.8 mm 8.4 mm 200 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

连接性 - 存储容量大,但没有 eSIM 卡

Galaxy A15 5G 的售价为 200 美元,配备 128 GB 存储空间和 4 GB 内存。与我们测试样品的前代产品相比,这使三星回到了同类产品的水平。

USB-C 端口只能以 USB 2.0 的速度进行内部连接,这意味着它只能以标准速度传输数据。喜欢使用模拟插孔耳机的用户会对 3.5 毫米音频接口感到满意。

此外,还配备了用于移动支付服务的 NFC 功能。不过,它不支持 eSIM 卡,这与 摩托罗拉 Moto G34为例。

底部 3.5 毫米音频插孔、麦克风、USB-C 接口、扬声器
底部 3.5 毫米音频插孔、麦克风、USB-C 接口、扬声器
首页: 麦克风
首页: 麦克风
右:待机键,音量摇杆
右:待机键,音量摇杆
左:SIM 卡插槽
左:SIM 卡插槽

microSD 读卡器

总共有两个 SIM 卡插槽,但其中一个被插入的 microSD 卡占用,用于扩展手机存储空间。这意味着您必须做出决定:要么使用两张 SIM 卡,要么使用一张 SIM 卡和一张 microSD 卡。

根据我们使用 Angelbird V60 参考卡进行的测试,读卡器的工作速度相当快,在复制测试中,它将大多数同价位的对比设备甩在了后面。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
50.48 MB/s +4%
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6100+, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird V60)
48.7 MB/s
Motorola Moto G34
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Angelbird V60)
39.5 MB/s -19%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
23.14 MB/s -52%
Nokia G42
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird V60)
21.4 MB/s -56%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6100+, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø38.4 (26.3-44.9)
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø37.2 (22.3-48.4)
Motorola Moto G34 Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø39.4 (26.3-51.7)
Nokia G42 Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB: Ø44.4 (30-53.7)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø36.3 (4.86-48.5)
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6100+, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø71.1 (32-79.2)
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø75.7 (20.1-83.4)
Motorola Moto G34 Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø73.1 (31.5-85.3)
Nokia G42 Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB: Ø76.8 (25.5-84.7)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø61.2 (29.9-79.8)

软件 - 有限制的长期更新承诺?

Android 14 预装在智能手机上,三星在上面铺设了自己的 OneUI 6.0 界面。这确实改变了 ,在某些情况下,如果你使用的是其他制造商的产品,可能需要一些时间来适应。与此同时,它还增加了许多有用的功能,例如每个应用程序的可定制语言设置、待机键的快捷方式以及在信使应用程序中同时使用多个帐户。Android

三星承诺为其手机提供长期更新:4 代操作系统,即Android 18 和 5 年的安全补丁,每三个月推出一次。但需要注意的是,制造商保留随时更改更新指南的权利,从而缩短承诺的更新支持时间。与此同时,三星也不可能愿意处理这样的公关丑闻,因此这可能更像是一句法律用语,但即便如此,也不能完全依赖这一承诺。

在测试时,我们测试样本的最新安全更新是 2024 年 1 月的。这意味着它仍在制造商规定的 3 个月时限内。根据我们的经验,至少在最初几年,三星通常会遵守这一规定。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 高速无线局域网和国际 5G

Galaxy A15 5G 支持 WiFi 5 作为其最快的无线局域网标准,因此,它的速度通常在 300 - 350 MBit/s 左右。这意味着您无法使用千兆网络连接,但这些差异只会在大量下载时才会显现出来。

在靠近路由器的地方,您可以使用路由器的全部接收功能,但即便如此,网站的加载也需要相当长的时间。如果与路由器的距离为 10 米,中间有三面墙,则只能获得一半的信号质量,因此网页的加载时间会更长,尤其是有大量图片的网页。

正如Galaxy A15 5G 的名字所暗示的,您可以使用最新的蜂窝标准,即 5G。这使得这款智能手机成为支持这一功能的最便宜的手机之一。它覆盖了相当多的 LTE 和 5G 频率,因此您可以在国际范围内使用这款手机。在长途旅行之前,您应该确保检查支持哪些频率,因为Galaxy 手机无法在全球范围内使用。

Networking
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G
iperf3 receive AXE11000
317 (min: 290) MBit/s ∼49%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
341 (min: 324) MBit/s ∼50%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
iperf3 receive AXE11000
369 (min: 361) MBit/s ∼57%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
369 (min: 337) MBit/s ∼54%
Motorola Moto G34
iperf3 receive AXE11000
279 (min: 210) MBit/s ∼43%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
337 (min: 287) MBit/s ∼49%
Nokia G42
iperf3 receive AXE11000
336 (min: 310) MBit/s ∼52%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
362 (min: 340) MBit/s ∼53%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
iperf3 receive AXE11000
347 (min: 336) MBit/s ∼53%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
363 (min: 349) MBit/s ∼53%
Average of class Smartphone
iperf3 receive AXE11000
651 (min: 34.8) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
686 (min: 40.5) MBit/s ∼100%
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø317 (290-347)
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø341 (324-350)
外部 GPS 测试
外部 GPS 测试
可用的卫星网络
可用的卫星网络

手机的定位服务使用了所有主要的卫星网络。由于 SBAS 还可用于更精确的定位,我们的位置很快就被确定在室外 2 米范围内。

我们想知道它在日常使用中的定位效果如何,为此,我们骑上了自行车。和我们一起骑车的还有 Garmin Venu 2 智能手表,该手表以其特别精确的定位功能而闻名。

Galaxy A15 5G 的表现也不差:智能手机记录的路线有时会与我们实际骑行的路线有些偏差,因此有时我们骑行时似乎会直接穿过前院或房屋。但总的来说,只有当你仔细观察时才会发现这一点,而且一般来说,我们的路线都被很好地记录下来了。

您可以放心地使用手机进行导航。不过,如果您需要极高的精确度,市场上还有更好的设备。

三星Galaxy A15 5G 定位服务 - 概述
三星Galaxy A15 5G 定位服务 - 概述
三星Galaxy A15 5G 定位服务--转折点
三星Galaxy A15 5G 定位服务--转折点
三星Galaxy A15 5G 定位服务 - 桥接
三星Galaxy A15 5G 定位服务 - 桥接
Garmin Venu 2 定位服务 - 概述
Garmin Venu 2 定位服务 - 概述
Garmin Venu 2 定位服务 - 转折点
Garmin Venu 2 定位服务 - 转折点
Garmin Venu 2 定位服务 - 桥接
Garmin Venu 2 定位服务 - 桥接

电话功能和通话质量 - 通话清晰

三星使用自己的电话应用程序,与Android 设备上标配的谷歌应用程序相比,它将键盘放在了更靠前的位置。三星应用程序的操作也很简单,提供了许多功能,包括阻止不想要的电话。

对于想要的电话,语音质量在同价位产品中还算不错。当然,市场上也有一些手机能让对方听得更清楚、更清晰,但我们的测试通话双方都能轻松听懂,其最大音量也足以淹没背景噪音。

通过扬声器和免提麦克风,Galaxy A15 5G 的用户只需确保说话声音不要太小,否则麦克风无法接收到你的声音。

摄像头 - 终于有了广角视野

使用前置摄像头拍摄的照片
使用前置摄像头拍摄的照片

在 200 美元左右的价格范围内,超广角镜头还不是标准配置,不过,三星可能已经找到了让自己的手机在竞争中脱颖而出的好方法。

因此,Galaxy A15 5G 首次配备了专门用于广角拍摄的 500 万像素镜头。我们的测试照片看起来对比度有点过高,但只要不放大,看起来应该没问题。个别细节难以辨认。此外,它的视野范围比高端相机窄得多:换算成 35 毫米格式,摄像头的焦距只有 17 毫米,而其他智能手机的焦距相当于 13 毫米。

它的主摄像头分辨率为 5000 万像素,但采用了常见的像素二进制方法,这意味着它实际上只能拍摄 1250 万像素的照片,但成像亮度更高。总的来说,照片看起来有点太暗,只能显示出一般的细节。风景图片中壮丽的天空得到了很好的再现,但其他区域则显得有些暗淡。

在光线较暗、对比度较高的条件下,相机可能能够很好地减轻画面的亮度,但反过来却丢失了很多较小的细节,尤其是蜡烛周围的细节。此外,照片看起来颗粒感很强,没有显示出很多细节。

背面的第三个镜头是一个微距镜头,可用于拍摄特写镜头。在光线条件良好的情况下,它能拍出不错的照片,但分辨率很低,所以你不应该尝试放大照片。

前置 1300 万像素摄像头可满足您所有的自拍需求。在光线良好的条件下,照片清晰度高,而且可以放大,但暗部只能显示很少的细节。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main camera plantMain camera landscapeMain camera low lightWide-angle camera

在实验室的全棚照明下,主相机在细节和对比度方面的清晰度很低。在只有 1 勒克斯的照明条件下,仍能辨认出大致的细节。

ColorChecker
4.4 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
4 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
5 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
2.8 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
4 ∆E
1.4 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
8 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy A15 5G: 5.67 ∆E min: 1.41 - max: 10.33 ∆E
ColorChecker
30.4 ∆E
53.5 ∆E
39.3 ∆E
34.1 ∆E
44.9 ∆E
59.2 ∆E
52.4 ∆E
33.8 ∆E
43.1 ∆E
28.5 ∆E
63.1 ∆E
62.4 ∆E
31.5 ∆E
46.3 ∆E
37.8 ∆E
74 ∆E
43.7 ∆E
40.4 ∆E
80.9 ∆E
68.7 ∆E
50.6 ∆E
36.4 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy A15 5G: 45.52 ∆E min: 13.46 - max: 80.95 ∆E

配件和保修 - 不含充电器

三星手机不附带充电器。制造商通过亚马逊商店出售相应的 25 瓦充电器,售价约为 10 美元。包装盒内只有一根 USB 数据线和一个 SIM 卡工具。

制造商为这款手机在美国提供 12 个月的标准保修。在大城市有许多三星服务中心,您可以将设备送去维修。

输入设备和操作 - 可靠的指纹传感器

三星在智能手机上安装了自己的键盘应用程序,你可以用它可靠地打字。如果你想使用不同的显示键盘,你可以很容易地从 Google Play 商店下载许多不同的键盘。

它的触摸屏每秒最多可扫描 90 次触摸,操作反应灵敏可靠。触摸屏在边边角角也能完美操作。

指纹传感器集成在机身右侧的待机键上。在很短的等待时间后就能解锁设备,通常第一次尝试就能成功。

您还可以使用面部识别来解锁设备。这是一种使用前置摄像头的 2D 方法,因此不能完全防止人为操作。尽管如此,它还是能快速可靠地工作。

直立式键盘
直立式键盘
水平键盘
水平键盘

显示屏 - 明亮的 OLED 显示屏是一大亮点

子像素阵列
子像素阵列

其略微增强的全高清分辨率和 6.5 英寸屏幕使这款手机首次达到了同类产品的水平,而一些竞争对手提供的屏幕却仍然较低。另一方面,AMOLED 屏幕在这个价位的手机中相当罕见,这也是Galaxy A15 5G 拥有的另一项新功能。其刷新率保持不变,仍为 90 Hz。

屏幕的最大亮度约为 700 cd/m²,即使在明亮的环境中也能正常使用。此外,由于采用了 AMOLED 技术,它的对比度在技术上达到了无限高的水平,让色彩熠熠生辉。

我们注意到,显示屏在低亮度水平时会闪烁,但这是与刷新率相适应的,而且亮度波动很小。对屏幕敏感的人还是应该在购买前试用一下,因为不排除长时间使用会引起头痛等问题。

683
cd/m²
694
cd/m²
708
cd/m²
701
cd/m²
705
cd/m²
712
cd/m²
699
cd/m²
703
cd/m²
706
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 712 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 701.2 cd/m² Minimum: 1.53 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 96 %
Center on Battery: 705 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.88 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 1.5 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
99% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.116
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.50
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
PLS LCD, 2408x1080, 6.60
Motorola Moto G34
IPS, 1600x720, 6.50
Nokia G42
IPS, 1612x720, 6.56
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.67
Screen
-169%
-27%
-116%
7%
Brightness middle
705
579
-18%
523
-26%
495
-30%
658
-7%
Brightness
701
543
-23%
512
-27%
452
-36%
663
-5%
Brightness Distribution
96
87
-9%
95
-1%
84
-12%
98
2%
Black Level *
0.57
0.47
0.5
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.88
7.6
-304%
1.89
-1%
6.09
-224%
1.4
26%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
4.57
12.7
-178%
4.63
-1%
9.35
-105%
2.7
41%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.5
8.7
-480%
3.1
-107%
5.8
-287%
1.7
-13%
Gamma
2.116 104%
2.23 99%
2.262 97%
2.325 95%
2.23 99%
CCT
6501 100%
9344 70%
6471 100%
8169 80%
6504 100%
Contrast
1016
1113
990

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 90 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 90 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 90 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17794 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

最低亮度
最低亮度
25% 亮度
25% 亮度
50% 亮度
50% 亮度
75% 亮度
75% 亮度
100% 亮度
100% 亮度

具有固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置的测量系列

使用手机屏幕设置中的 "自然 "色彩模式,我们在使用分光光度计和 CalMAN 软件进行的测试中实现了非常精确的色彩和灰度显示。这意味着该屏幕也可用于专业用途。

卡尔曼灰度
卡尔曼灰度
CalMAN 色彩精度
CalMAN 色彩精度
CalMAN sRGB 色彩空间
CalMAN sRGB 色彩空间
CalMAN AdobeRGB 色彩空间
CalMAN AdobeRGB 色彩空间
CalMAN DCI P3 色彩空间
CalMAN DCI P3 色彩空间
CalMAN 饱和度
CalMAN 饱和度

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
1.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.6 ms rise
↘ 0.7 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.4 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.8 ms rise
↘ 0.8 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

在室外,当手机的亮度传感器被激活时,显示屏通常能在天空反光的情况下仍能显示内容。不过,在光线较暗的地方工作还是要舒适得多。

它的可视角度没有问题,因此从侧面也能轻松阅读显示内容。

室外使用
室外使用
视角
视角

性能 - 更强的动力会更好

虽然 三星Galaxy A15 5G采用了新的 SoC,但与去年的 Galaxy A14 5G相比,三星 A15 5G 采用了全新的 SoC,但这并不能说是一种进步,因为它的改进微乎其微。联发科 联发科 Dimensity 6100+的内核和时钟频率与前代机型的 SoC 完全相同,只是采用了效率稍高的 6 纳米工艺。

遗憾的是,该 SoC 的性能并不出众--即使对于这个相对便宜的价格级别来说也是如此。在绝大多数基准测试中,Galaxy A15 5G 只能排在最后几位,偶尔也会在比较领域中取得平均成绩。如今,你可以用类似的价格买到功能更强大的智能手机,在日常使用中你也会发现这一点:在日常使用中,你也会发现这一点:在使用手机时,你会经常发现自己在等待加载内容和处理掉帧问题。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (119 - 2138, n=216, last 2 years)
915 Points +70%
Motorola Moto G34
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
676 Points +26%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1, Adreno 619, 6144
642 Points +19%
Nokia G42
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
554 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
538 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 6100+
  (521 - 538, n=3)
530 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
525 Points -2%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 6681, n=216, last 2 years)
3000 Points +69%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1, Adreno 619, 6144
1954 Points +10%
Motorola Moto G34
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
1794 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1780 Points
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1700 Points -4%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 6100+
  (1589 - 1780, n=3)
1694 Points -5%
Nokia G42
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1643 Points -8%
Geekbench 6.2
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (193 - 2930, n=112, last 2 years)
1373 Points +99%
Motorola Moto G34
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
907 Points +31%
Nokia G42
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
746 Points +8%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 6100+
  (690 - 699, n=3)
694 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
690 Points
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (845 - 7408, n=112, last 2 years)
3804 Points +110%
Motorola Moto G34
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2020 Points +11%
Nokia G42
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1917 Points +6%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 6100+
  (1814 - 1944, n=3)
1890 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1814 Points
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (102602 - 1650926, n=149, last 2 years)
746268 Points +148%
Motorola Moto G34
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
395991 Points +32%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 6100+
  (300573 - 353627, n=3)
332388 Points +11%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
308581 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
300573 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1, Adreno 619, 6144
Points -100%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average of class Smartphone
  (4761 - 21385, n=215, last 2 years)
11875 Points +32%
Motorola Moto G34
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
11314 Points +25%
Nokia G42
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
10492 Points +16%
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
9018 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 6100+
  (8482 - 9018, n=3)
8832 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
8038 Points -11%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1, Adreno 619, 6144
7953 Points -12%
CrossMark - Overall
Average of class Smartphone
  (200 - 1474, n=164, last 2 years)
842 Points +69%
Motorola Moto G34
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
598 Points +20%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1, Adreno 619, 6144
539 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
534 Points +7%
Nokia G42
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
525 Points +5%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 6100+
  (499 - 524, n=3)
515 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
499 Points
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average of class Smartphone
  (411 - 11438, n=164, last 2 years)
5868 Points +103%
Motorola Moto G34
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3644 Points +26%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1, Adreno 619, 6144
3337 Points +16%
Nokia G42
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3311 Points +15%
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2884 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 6100+
  (2808 - 2884, n=3)
2841 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2825 Points -2%
System
Average of class Smartphone
  (2376 - 16475, n=164, last 2 years)
9813 Points +49%
Motorola Moto G34
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
7037 Points +7%
Nokia G42
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
6975 Points +6%
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
6591 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1, Adreno 619, 6144
6437 Points -2%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 6100+
  (5137 - 6591, n=3)
5839 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
5508 Points -16%
Memory
Average of class Smartphone
  (670 - 12716, n=164, last 2 years)
6373 Points +115%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1, Adreno 619, 6144
4065 Points +37%
Motorola Moto G34
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
4005 Points +35%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
3991 Points +35%
Nokia G42
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3715 Points +26%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 6100+
  (2959 - 3784, n=3)
3301 Points +12%
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2959 Points
Graphics
Average of class Smartphone
  (697 - 58651, n=164, last 2 years)
14657 Points +430%
Motorola Moto G34
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
4360 Points +58%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1, Adreno 619, 6144
4001 Points +45%
Nokia G42
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3826 Points +38%
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2768 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 6100+
  (2749 - 2768, n=3)
2759 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2676 Points -3%
Web
Average of class Smartphone
  (10 - 2145, n=164, last 2 years)
1510 Points +18%
Motorola Moto G34
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
1434 Points +12%
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1282 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 6100+
  (1159 - 1282, n=3)
1240 Points -3%
Nokia G42
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1213 Points -5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1, Adreno 619, 6144
1184 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1083 Points -16%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Average of class Smartphone
  (207 - 84787, n=148, last 2 years)
21505 Points +242%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 6100+
  (6283 - 6895, n=3)
6542 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
6303 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
6283 Points
Motorola Moto G34
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
5790 Points -8%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1, Adreno 619, 6144
5395 Points -14%
Nokia G42
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
5126 Points -18%
AImark - Score v3.x
Average of class Smartphone
  (298 - 245629, n=107, last 2 years)
17669 Points +1714%
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
974 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 6100+
  (905 - 987, n=3)
955 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
949 Points -3%
Motorola Moto G34
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
426 Points -56%
Nokia G42
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
413 Points -58%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1, Adreno 619, 6144
Points -100%

在图形性能方面,这款 SoC 也没有给人留下深刻印象:大多数对比设备都能提供更强的动力。因此,如果你喜欢玩游戏或想使用要求更高的应用程序,那么你可能应该另寻他处。

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Motorola Moto G34
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
354 Points +9%
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6100+, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
325 Points
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
310 Points -5%
Nokia G42
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
288 Points -11%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
Points -100%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Motorola Moto G34
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
364 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6100+, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
336 Points
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
324 Points -4%
Nokia G42
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
294 Points -12%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
Points -100%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Motorola Moto G34
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1206 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6100+, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1204 Points
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1139 Points -5%
Nokia G42
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
970 Points -19%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
Points -100%
3DMark / Wild Life Score
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6100+, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1228 Points
Motorola Moto G34
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1212 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1191 Points -3%
Nokia G42
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
984 Points -20%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
Points -100%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2846 Points +4%
Nokia G42
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2799 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6100+, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2741 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2677 Points -2%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2347 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2289 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6100+, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2269 Points
Nokia G42
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2231 Points -2%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2413 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2393 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6100+, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2359 Points
Nokia G42
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2336 Points -1%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3618 Points +9%
Nokia G42
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3359 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6100+, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3327 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3231 Points -3%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2590 Points +11%
Nokia G42
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2448 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2347 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6100+, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2336 Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2709 Points +8%
Nokia G42
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2605 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2546 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6100+, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2502 Points
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Motorola Moto G34
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
108 fps +100%
Nokia G42
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
83 fps +54%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
58 fps +7%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
56 fps +4%
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6100+, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
54 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Motorola Moto G34
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
94 fps +54%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
85 fps +39%
Nokia G42
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
81 fps +33%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
64 fps +5%
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6100+, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
61 fps
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Motorola Moto G34
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
75 fps +108%
Nokia G42
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
62 fps +72%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
36 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6100+, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
36 fps
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
27 fps -25%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Motorola Moto G34
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
47 fps +18%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
43 fps +8%
Nokia G42
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
41 fps +3%
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6100+, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
40 fps
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
36 fps -10%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Motorola Moto G34
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
63 fps +186%
Nokia G42
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
51 fps +132%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
25 fps +14%
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6100+, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
22 fps
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
21 fps -5%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Motorola Moto G34
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
34 fps +36%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
31 fps +24%
Nokia G42
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
29 fps +16%
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6100+, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
25 fps
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
24 fps -4%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Motorola Moto G34
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
35 fps +192%
Nokia G42
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
28 fps +133%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
15 fps +25%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
12 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6100+, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
12 fps
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Motorola Moto G34
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
20 fps +33%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
17 fps +13%
Nokia G42
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
16 fps +7%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
15 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6100+, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
15 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Motorola Moto G34
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
24 fps +179%
Nokia G42
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
19 fps +121%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
11 fps +28%
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6100+, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
8.6 fps
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
7.9 fps -8%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Motorola Moto G34
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
8.2 fps +44%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
7.1 fps +25%
Nokia G42
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
6.5 fps +14%
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6100+, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.7 fps
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.3 fps -7%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Motorola Moto G34
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
38 fps +171%
Nokia G42
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
30 fps +114%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
17 fps +21%
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6100+, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
14 fps
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
12 fps -14%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Motorola Moto G34
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
21 fps +40%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
20 fps +33%
Nokia G42
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
18 fps +20%
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6100+, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
15 fps
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
14 fps -7%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Motorola Moto G34
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3.6 fps +50%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3.1 fps +29%
Nokia G42
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2.9 fps +21%
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6100+, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2.4 fps
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2.3 fps -4%

在加载大型网站时,你不得不时不时地忍受一些等待时间,尤其是在等待加载图片时。在基准测试过程中,我们的测试样本可能取得了平均成绩,但这也与它的浏览器版本更新潮有关。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 351, n=170, last 2 years)
107.8 Points +44%
Motorola Moto G34 (Chrome 122)
105.304 Points +40%
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G (Chrome 122)
75.019 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 6100+ (74.5 - 75, n=3)
74.8 Points 0%
Nokia G42 (Chrome 115)
65.687 Points -12%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G (Chrome 113.0.5672.76)
58.044 Points -23%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G (Chrome 112)
48.955 Points -35%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (14.9 - 445, n=154, last 2 years)
109.8 runs/min +94%
Motorola Moto G34 (Chrome 122)
80.1 runs/min +42%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 6100+ (56.5 - 63.3, n=3)
59 runs/min +4%
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G (Chrome 122)
56.5 runs/min
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G (Chrome 113.0.5672.76)
48.5 runs/min -14%
Nokia G42 (Chrome 115)
47.6 runs/min -16%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G (Chrome 112)
34.4 runs/min -39%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Motorola Moto G34 (Chrome 122)
111 Points +48%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 202, n=160, last 2 years)
101 Points +35%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 6100+ (75 - 79, n=3)
77.7 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G (Chrome 122)
75 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G (Chrome 113.0.5672.76)
68 Points -9%
Nokia G42 (Chrome 115)
63 Points -16%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G (2111)
50 Points -33%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 89112, n=215, last 2 years)
33521 Points +54%
Motorola Moto G34 (Chrome 122)
31647 Points +45%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 6100+ (21764 - 22617, n=3)
22165 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G (Chrome 122)
21764 Points
Nokia G42 (Chrome 115)
20689 Points -5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G (Chrome 113.0.5672.76)
19867 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G (Chrome 112)
15352 Points -29%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G (Chrome 112)
2337.2 ms * -17%
Nokia G42 (Chrome 115)
2279.9 ms * -14%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G (Chrome 113.0.5672.76)
2117.2 ms * -6%
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G (Chrome 122)
2002.7 ms *
Average MediaTek Dimensity 6100+ (1984 - 2003, n=3)
1992 ms * +1%
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=170, last 2 years)
1545 ms * +23%
Motorola Moto G34 (Chrome 122)
1298.2 ms * +35%

* ... smaller is better

实际上,它的存储速度似乎还不如三星Galaxy A14 5G:事实证明,存储控制器的速度要慢得多,这在连续读取测试中表现得尤为明显。

即便如此,与同价位的其他智能手机相比,Galaxy A15 5G 在存储速度方面至少是不相上下的。

Samsung Galaxy A15 5GSamsung Galaxy A14 5GMotorola Moto G34Nokia G42Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5GAverage 128 GB UFS 2.2 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
14%
-4%
-11%
-9%
6%
97%
Sequential Read 256KB
499.6
849.3
70%
524.1
5%
492.5
-1%
520.09
4%
Sequential Write 256KB
498.1
469.83
-6%
495
-1%
461.8
-7%
505.55
1%
Random Read 4KB
194
193.63
0%
192.1
-1%
183.3
-6%
170.61
-12%
189.1 ?(89.3 - 297, n=63)
-3%
Random Write 4KB
223.5
204
-9%
180.2
-19%
161.1
-28%
161.26
-28%
181.5 ?(62.6 - 419, n=63)
-19%
Samsung Galaxy A15 5GMotorola Moto G34Average 128 GB UFS 2.2 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
PCMark for Android
16%
15%
145%
Storage 2.0 seq. read int.
449 ?(3.0.4061)
462 ?(3.0.4061)
3%
Storage 2.0 seq. write int.
372 ?(3.0.4061)
420 ?(3.0.4061)
13%
Storage 2.0 random read int.
27.7 ?(3.0.4061)
29 ?(3.0.4061)
5%
Storage 2.0 random write int.
29 ?(3.0.4061)
41.9 ?(3.0.4061)
44%
Storage 2.0
16516 ?(3.0.4061)
18862 ?(3.0.4061)
14%

游戏 - 更基本的游戏

在三星Galaxy A15 5G 上玩游戏很有趣,只要你不把期望值定得太高:这款手机能以 30fps 的高分辨率显示《源氏冲击》或《PUBG Mobile 》等游戏,但帧速率并不可靠,我们注意到帧速率经常下降。

如果将细节设置为低,那么实际上可以达到 40fps,但其稳定性仍然不佳。我们使用GameBench 软件测量了帧速率。.

总而言之,三星手机更适合那些喜欢休闲游戏的玩家,或者在玩要求较高的游戏时不介意偶尔掉帧的玩家。

在我们的测试过程中,通过触摸屏和位置传感器(如适用)控制游戏的工作完美无瑕。

PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile
源泉冲击
源泉冲击
051015202530354045Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G; Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps: Ø35.4 (13-46)
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G; Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps: Ø23.2 (9-30)
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø37.4 (26-41)
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø29.1 (21-31)

废气排放 -Galaxy A15 5G 的温度相当高

温度

在长时间负载后,我们发现手机表面温度高达 45.5 °C。这一点非常明显,可能会让人感觉有点不舒服--更何况我们是在室温下进行测量的。更高的环境温度可能会导致温度进一步升高。

值得肯定的是,手机的高温并没有影响 SoC 的性能:即使在一个基准测试运行了 20 次之后,帧速率仍然保持稳定。

Max. Load
 42.5 °C34.6 °C33.1 °C 
 43.4 °C35.6 °C32.9 °C 
 42.3 °C39.2 °C32.7 °C 
Maximum: 43.4 °C
Average: 37.4 °C
31.9 °C33.3 °C44.2 °C
32.3 °C33.7 °C45.5 °C
32 °C36.5 °C44.4 °C
Maximum: 45.5 °C
Average: 37.1 °C
Power Supply (max.)  41.9 °C | Room Temperature 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.4 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.4 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.5 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.3 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.5 % 0%
Nokia G42
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.4 % 0%
Motorola Moto G34
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
99.4 % 0%
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6100+, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.3 %
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Nokia G42
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.5 % +2%
Motorola Moto G34
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
98.7 % +1%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
98.4 % +1%
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6100+, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
97.4 %
01234567Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6100+, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø2.02 (1.986-2.04)
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø1.978 (1.957-1.988)
Motorola Moto G34 Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø2.16 (2.15-2.18)
Nokia G42 Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø1.747 (1.744-1.754)
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6100+, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.34 (7.3-7.35)
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø7.2 (7.18-7.21)
Motorola Moto G34 Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.24 (7.23-7.28)
Nokia G42 Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø5.88 (5.86-5.9)
正面热图
正面热图
热图返回
热图返回

发言人

底部边缘的扬声器即使在高音量时也能提供良好的单声道音效。你不应该对低频或低音抱有期望,它的声音有点重高音。因此,语音和人声非常容易理解,但音乐整体不够饱满,电影效果听起来也有点弱。

您可以通过连接外置扬声器或耳机来获得更强的音效。这可以通过 3.5 毫米模拟音频接口和蓝牙实现。对于三星的无线音频编解码器,你不应该期望有太多的选择:除了三星耳机主要支持的内部 SSC 外,还有 SBC、aptX、LDAC 和 AAC 可供选择。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.637.92537.637.23130.728.14033.431.95038.433.56324.526.38016.524.110015.820.712513.129.216014.6372008.641.12507.846.83157.252.24008.558.250010.161.463010.961.980010.969.3100012.667.512509.174.416009.672.5200010.174.5250010.869.9315012.769.9400013.265.6500015.272.8630014.373.2800015.3771000016.167.11250016.359.61600017.252.4SPL24.983.7N0.656.8median 12.6median 65.6Delta2.98.930.734.720.835.31931.217.134.233.440.120.940.116.638.720.541.416.54214.742.21445.414.349.213.154.613.660.313.267.312.370.212.572.211.979.312.678.812.979.113.379.612.578.813.480.513.98313.983.113.580.713.776.313.977.713.576.413.761.825.391.50.787.4median 13.5median 76.40.79.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy A15 5GXiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 40% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 60% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.6% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.9% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 17% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 39% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 - 充电速度快,续航时间长

耗电量

这款手机的功耗相对较低,因此与上一代产品相比,SoC 的效率改进似乎效果不错。

智能手机的充电功率可达 25 瓦。包装中没有随附充电器,但智能手机在使用我们测试过的所有不同品牌的充电器时都能正常工作。与前代产品相比,充电功率的提高也缩短了设备的充电时间:最多需要 2 小时才能充满 5,000 毫安时的电池。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.1 / 1.3 / 1.5 Watt
Load midlight 2.6 / 4.7 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
5000 mAh
Motorola Moto G34
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
5000 mAh
Average MediaTek Dimensity 6100+
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-25%
-10%
-21%
5%
-39%
Idle Minimum *
1.1
0.64
42%
1
9%
0.99
10%
1.05 ?(1 - 1.1, n=2)
5%
Idle Average *
1.3
2.1
-62%
1.5
-15%
1.98
-52%
1.25 ?(1.2 - 1.3, n=2)
4%
Idle Maximum *
1.5
2.17
-45%
1.8
-20%
2.02
-35%
Load Average *
2.6
3.73
-43%
3.2
-23%
3.35
-29%
2.45 ?(2.3 - 2.6, n=2)
6%
Load Maximum *
4.7
5.44
-16%
4.8
-2%
4.72
-0%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

00.20.50.70.91.21.41.61.92.12.32.62.833.23.53.73.94.24.4Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø2.71 (1.132-4.64)
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.185 (1.11-1.353)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

00.10.30.40.60.70.911.21.31.51.61.71.922.22.32.52.62.8Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø2.71 (2.57-2.9)
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.185 (1.11-1.353)

运行时间

在运行时间方面,Galaxy A15 5G 在其价格范围内具有相当的竞争力,但与前代产品相比略有不足。这款手机的续航时间明显较短,尤其是在测量空闲运行时间(即无高负载情况下)时。

不过,在我们的 WLAN 测试中,它的续航时间超过了 16 个小时,在无需充电的情况下,雨天使用手机应该还是足够的。内置存储的视频播放时间将近 19:18小时,这对于一次性看完8部《哈利-波特》电影来说是远远不够的。

在负载情况下,手机的续航时间为 5:38 小时,所以你可以轻松地玩上这么长时间的游戏。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
29h 15min
WiFi Websurfing
16h 05min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
19h 18min
Load (maximum brightness)
5h 38min
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
5000 mAh
Motorola Moto G34
5000 mAh
Nokia G42
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
5000 mAh
Battery Runtime
13%
-3%
-3%
-8%
Reader / Idle
1755
2558
46%
1472
-16%
1668
-5%
H.264
1158
1111
-4%
1205
4%
1065
-8%
WiFi v1.3
965
1029
7%
995
3%
933
-3%
645
-33%
Load
338
340
1%
329
-3%
388
15%

Pros

+ 明亮的 AMOLED 屏幕
+ 超广角摄像头
+ 搭载 5G 和 NFC
+ 长期更新承诺
+ 快速充电
+ 定位精度高
+ 快速指纹传感器
+ 运行时间适合日常使用

Cons

- 容易留下指纹痕迹
- 屏幕闪烁
- 功率相对较低
- 广角镜头视野较窄
- 手机不带充电器

结论 - 值得推荐,得益于它的改进

三星Galaxy A15 5G 评测。测试设备由提供:
三星Galaxy A15 5G 评测。测试设备由提供:
cyberport.de

它的价格相当实惠,仍然支持 5G,新功能包括全高清 AMOLED 屏幕、超广角摄像头、更快的充电速度和 5 年的安全更新--三星Galaxy A15 5G 已经获得了一些重要的更新,这一方面使它不至于落后于竞争对手。但另一方面,制造商也明确表示,花很少的钱,你仍然可以获得丰富的功能。

一些较小的妥协让这款物美价廉的中端手机在功能上略显乏味:三星在更新承诺中加入了 "最多 "一词,这让它的更新承诺变得有点不可靠;手机不附带充电器;超广角镜头的视野比其他手机差很多。

如果你想在没有保护壳的情况下使用手机,那么你就必须习惯背面的指纹痕迹,如果你追求纯净的系统,那么你首先得花点时间卸载预装软件。三星本可以为这款经济实惠的手机提供更强大的功能,因为有时你不得不忍受偶尔的掉帧和等待时间。

即便如此,Galaxy A15 5G 还是有很多我们喜欢的地方:比如相对精确的定位服务、可靠的无线局域网、良好的运行时间和明亮的显示屏等等。总之,这使得这款三星手机成为一个非常优质的选择。

三星Galaxy A15 5G 不愧是一款经济实惠的中端手机,与上一代产品相比,它在所有正确的方面都有所改进。

如果你不太看重 AMOLED 屏幕,那么你可以花很少的钱买到这款手机的前代产品,即 Galaxy A14 5G.另一个可行的选择是 摩托罗拉 Moto G34 5G尽管你不得不使用分辨率较低的屏幕。

价格和供应情况

目前,您可以从亚马逊以 199.99 美元的价格购买Galaxy A15 5G。

Samsung Galaxy A15 5G - 03/27/2024 v7
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
82%
Keyboard
65 / 75 → 87%
Pointing Device
88%
Connectivity
50 / 70 → 71%
Weight
88%
Battery
91%
Display
91%
Games Performance
26 / 64 → 41%
Application Performance
69 / 86 → 80%
Temperature
89%
Noise
100%
Audio
70 / 90 → 78%
Camera
58%
Average
74%
80%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Transparency

The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 三星Galaxy A15 5G 智能手机评测--经济型手机的重要更新
Florian Schmitt, 2024-03-29 (Update: 2024-03-29)