Notebookcheck Logo

三星Galaxy A15 4G 智能手机评测--价格低廉,功能强大,适合日常使用

谁还需要高端产品? 现在,三星在其入门级手机Galaxy A 系列中也使用了明亮的 AMOLED 屏幕,并配备了速度更快的存储设备和广角摄像头。这样一来,是否就不需要更昂贵的智能手机了呢?我们将在测试中揭晓答案。
Android ARM Smartphone

经济型智能手机备受青睐,可以处理越来越多的任务。其中一个原因是这一价格区间竞争激烈,因为既有较小规模的经济型智能手机制造商,也有涵盖整个领域的大品牌。三星属于后者。我们已经测试了 Galaxy A15 5G并发现它是一款出色的升级产品。现在,我们将进一步了解Galaxy A15 的 LTE 版本,它能让您再节省几十欧元。

Galaxy A15 4G 也不缺乏任何设备:大量存储空间、明亮且相当快的 AMOLED 屏幕以及高负载速度都是它的亮点。我们将开始广泛的评测,详细了解这款价格实惠的Galaxy 的真正功能。

Samsung Galaxy A15 (Galaxy A10 Series)
Processor
Mediatek Helio G99 8 x 2 - 2.2 GHz, Cortex-A76 / A55
Graphics adapter
Memory
4 GB 
Display
6.50 inch 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixel 396 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, Super AMOLED, glossy: yes, 90 Hz
Storage
128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 128 GB 
, 105 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: 3.5 mm audio port, Card Reader: microSD (shared, up to 1TB) , 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Sensors: accelerometer, compass
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.3, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B5/​B8), 4G (B1/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B20/​B28/​B38/​B40/​B41), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.4 x 160.1 x 76.8
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Ion, 25 Watt charging
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 14
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix f/​1.8, phase comparison AF, LED flash, videos @1080p/​30fps (camera 1); 5.0MP, f/​2.2, wide angle lens (camera 2); 2.0MP, f/​2.4, macro lens (camera 3)
Secondary Camera: 13 MPix f/2.0
Additional features
Speakers: mono speaker, USB cable, 24 Months Warranty, SAR: 0.42W/​kg Head, 1.29W/​kg Body , fanless
Weight
200 g
Price
190 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
80 %
04/2024
Samsung Galaxy A15
Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2
200 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.50"2340x1080
80.2 %
02/2024
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
SD 685, Adreno 610
188.5 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.67"2400x1080
75.9 %
07/2023
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2
201 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.60"2408x1080
78.7 %
05/2023
Nokia G22
T606, Mali-G57 MP1
195 g64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.52"1600x720
80.7 %
10/2023
Motorola Moto G54
Dimensity 7020, IMG BXM-8-256
177 g256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.50"2400x1080

如果把Galaxy A15 4G 和 5G 机型放在一起,你不会看到任何外部差异,因为两款智能手机使用的是完全相同的外壳。因此,那些想购买特定版本的用户在商店里要非常小心,因为Galaxy A15 4G 只能通过背面的一张很小的贴纸来识别,贴纸上的型号是 A155F。

与同类机型一样,A15 4G 也是塑料外壳。在我们的测试机上,这次的背面是夜蓝色。高光表面在光线下闪闪发光,因此经常会留下指纹。该机型还有浅蓝色和粉黄色可供选择,粉黄色是三种颜色版本中最大胆的一种。

正面屏幕周围的边框相当宽,而一些竞争对手如 小米Redmi Note 13 4G摩托 G54等竞争对手已经在这方面展现出了更现代的外观。

这款智能手机的外壳很坚固,做工也很好,尽管在我们试图扭动它时会产生一些轻微的吱吱声。

尺寸比较

167.7 mm 78 mm 9.1 mm 201 g165 mm 76.2 mm 8.5 mm 195 g162.2 mm 75.6 mm 8 mm 188.5 g161.6 mm 73.8 mm 8 mm 177 g160.1 mm 76.8 mm 8.4 mm 200 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

设备 - 更多存储空间和 NFC

与Galaxy A14 LTE 的前身相比,该机的存储空间有所升级,从 64 GB 的慢速 eMMC 闪存变为速度更快的 128 GB UFS 2.2 存储空间。不过,您仍然需要使用 4GB 内存。

此外,该机还配备了日常使用所需的大部分接口:USB-C 接口(USB 2.0 接口,用于充电和数据传输)、NFC 接口(用于无线支付服务)、3.5 毫米音频接口和现代化的蓝牙 5.3。

遗憾的是,它仍然不支持名为 eSIM 的虚拟 SIM 卡。摩托罗拉 摩托罗拉 Moto G54在这方面配置更好。

底部 3.5 毫米音频接口、麦克风、USB-C 接口、扬声器
底部 3.5 毫米音频接口、麦克风、USB-C 接口、扬声器
首页: 麦克风
首页: 麦克风
左侧SIM 卡插槽
左侧SIM 卡插槽
右侧:待机键、音量摇杆
右侧:待机键、音量摇杆

microSD 读卡器

虽然有两个 SIM 卡插槽,但如果您还想插入 microSD 卡,就必须使用两个插槽中的一个。microSD 卡可用于扩展存储空间或在设备间传输数据。

我们使用 Angelbird V60 参考卡对读卡器的速度进行了评估,结果令人满意: 42.在复制测试中,6 MB/s 是一个非常不错的数值,高于大多数同类设备。由此可见,读卡器的数据传输速度相当快,不过在传输速率方面,它仍然无法充分发挥 Angelbird microSD 卡的潜力。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
50 MB/s +17%
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird V60)
42.6 MB/s
Motorola Moto G54
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash (Angelbird V60)
36.2 MB/s -15%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird V60)
24.3 MB/s -43%
Nokia G22
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird V60)
19.6 MB/s -54%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy A15 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø35.2 (23-46.3)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø26.5 (17.2-40)
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø34.3 (26.7-47.7)
Nokia G22 Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø37.6 (30.1-45.4)
Motorola Moto G54 IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø34.3 (21.6-47.4)
Samsung Galaxy A15 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø75.1 (47.4-81.9)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø76 (18.4-82.5)
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø74.3 (37-79.3)
Nokia G22 Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø73.1 (39-81.8)
Motorola Moto G54 IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø71.9 (29.9-78.1)

软件 -Galaxy 智能手机,承诺长期更新

这款智能手机使用Android 14 和三星自己的 OneUI 6.1 用户界面。预装了许多应用程序,其中大部分来自三星自己,但也有一些第三方广告应用程序。不过,其中大部分都可以轻松卸载。三星的一些应用程序还将谷歌预装应用程序提供的功能加倍。

由于获得了谷歌 Widevine 数字版权管理的 L1 级认证,你可以享受到来自大型服务的高质量流媒体电影。

在更新周期方面,制造商承诺的时间非常长,安全更新长达 5 年,因此直到 2029 年,而Android 长达 4 代,这将是Android 18。不过,我们也必须注意到,由于这一承诺中添加了 "直至 "字样,情况也可能发生变化,这也是这一更新保证的一大局限。我们只能希望三星不会因为违背承诺而冒公关噩梦的风险。

在我们的测试机中,安全补丁是从 2024 年 1 月 1 日开始的,在本次测试中,这仍在三星承诺的 3 个月时限内。但为了不超出这个时限,下一次更新应该很快就会到来。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 适合日常使用的连接性

三星Galaxy A15 4G 通过 WLAN 上网的最快标准是 WiFi 5。基本上可以达到 300 - 350 Mbit/s 的典型访问速度,而且智能手机在接收数据时只比同类设备慢一点点。

在靠近路由器的地方,加载大型网站上的图片仍然需要几秒钟。在 10 米(约 33 英尺)的距离内,隔着 3 面墙,我们获得的信号强度仍然只有智能手机的一半左右,网站加载速度也相应较慢。

我们的测试设备支持通过中欧移动网络访问互联网所需的频段。如果你去其他国家旅行并想在那里访问移动互联网,应该事先检查是否支持必要的 LTE 频率。您可以查看互联网上的一些表格(例如这里维基百科),并将其与智能手机的规格进行比较,您可以在本文上面找到。

在我们长达约两周的测试中,在一些抽查中,接收效果无法与Apple 或Honor 的高端设备相媲美。虽然Galaxy A15 LTE 能在其他设备也能接收信号的地方成功获得信号,但信号往往稍弱一些。

Networking
Samsung Galaxy A15
iperf3 receive AXE11000
285 (min: 259) MBit/s ∼43%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
364 (min: 352) MBit/s ∼52%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
iperf3 receive AXE11000
317 (min: 293) MBit/s ∼48%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
364 (min: 336) MBit/s ∼52%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
iperf3 receive AXE11000
337 (min: 68) MBit/s ∼51%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
365 (min: 331) MBit/s ∼53%
Nokia G22
iperf3 receive AXE11000
315 (min: 226) MBit/s ∼48%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
362 (min: 319) MBit/s ∼52%
Motorola Moto G54
iperf3 receive AXE11000
365 (min: 347) MBit/s ∼56%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
306 (min: 277) MBit/s ∼44%
Average of class Smartphone
iperf3 receive AXE11000
657 (min: 34.8) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
694 (min: 40.5) MBit/s ∼100%
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340360Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy A15; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø285 (259-304)
Samsung Galaxy A15; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø364 (352-375)
户外 GPS 测试
户外 GPS 测试
可用的卫星网络
可用的卫星网络

为了确定自己的位置,三星智能手机使用了所有大型卫星网络和 SBAS 进行更精确的定位。这使其在室外的定位精度可达 1 米(约 3 英尺)。

为了进一步了解这款智能手机在实际应用中的定位情况,例如将其用作导航设备时的情况,我们骑着它进行了一次自行车旅行,同时还带上了以高精度著称的 Garmin Venu 2 智能手表。

因此,我们发现Galaxy A15 4G 也能比较准确地定位我们所走的路线。不过,它在开阔地带的表现一般要好于在老城区的狭窄小巷中,在那里它经常会让我们走一些小弯路,显示我们穿过房屋或差点掉进河里。

一般来说,也可以推荐使用Galaxy A15 4G 导航系统,尤其是在穿越建筑较少的地区时。但时不时还是会出现一些轻微的误差,需要绝对精确度的用户应该寻找其他设备。

三星Galaxy A15 4G 定位 - 概述
三星Galaxy A15 4G 定位 - 概述
三星Galaxy A15 4G 定位 - 转折点
三星Galaxy A15 4G 定位 - 转折点
三星Galaxy A15 4G 定位 - 桥接
三星Galaxy A15 4G 定位 - 桥接
Garmin Venu 2 定位 - 概述
Garmin Venu 2 定位 - 概述
Garmin Venu 2 定位 - 转折点
Garmin Venu 2 定位 - 转折点
Garmin Venu 2 定位 - 桥接
Garmin Venu 2 定位 - 桥接

电话功能和语音质量 - 存在噪音

虽然三星使用自己的内部应用程序拨打电话,但你也可以毫不费力地安装其他电话应用程序,并将其设置为默认设置。

使用听筒通话时,声音响亮且相当清晰,但我们的谈话对象听起来略显沉闷。虽然Galaxy A15 4G 的机主说话声音不宜过小,但麦克风在录制我们自己的声音时表现良好,没有任何失真。使用扬声器模式,您还可以用大音量拨打电话。虽然只要我们不小声说话,麦克风就能清晰地记录我们的声音,但恼人的背景噪音很难被过滤掉。

摄像机 - 灵活的摄像机系统

使用前置摄像头拍摄的照片
使用前置摄像头拍摄的照片

通过对Galaxy A15 5G 的测试,我们已经了解了该机的摄像头配置:LTE 机型的 5000 万像素主摄像头在同价位机型中也能拍出不错的照片。例如,在我们拍摄的周围环境照片中,戏剧性的天空被描绘得相当细腻。不过,摄像头的清晰度一般。

尽管在弱光条件下,相机能产生良好的整体亮度,但图像中剩余的明亮区域亮度过高,细节丢失。

类似的经济型智能手机已经很少配备广角摄像头,但Galaxy A15 4G 却配备了广角摄像头。500 万像素的分辨率并不高,而且正如我们在 5G 机型上看到的那样,与其他智能手机相比,可视角度并不大。该镜头适合抓拍,使相机系统整体略显灵活。但照片不宜放大太多,因为细节难以辨认。

您还可以在背面找到一个分辨率为 200 万像素的微距摄像头,用于拍摄极限特写。虽然传感器的分辨率很低,但仍足以在智能手机显示屏上查看图像。

视频录制最高可达 1080p 和 30 fps。在开始录制之前,您必须在超广角镜头和主摄像头之间进行选择,因为在录制过程中已无法进行选择。图像质量总体上比较稳定,自动对焦和亮度调节工作相当迅速,而且连续可变。

前置摄像头最大可拍摄 1300 万像素的自拍照,整体看起来相当清晰,而且还能轻松放大。不过,即使在光线条件良好的情况下,暗处的细节也已无法辨认。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main Camera: PlantMain Camera: SurroundingsMain Camera: Low LightWideangle Camera

我们可以精确控制工作室的光线条件,并在这里再次测试主相机。我们的测试图清晰度较低,对比度也有所欠缺。在仅有 1 Lux 的余光下,物体几乎无法辨认。

色彩还原的整体对比度较低。

ColorChecker
3.6 ∆E
10 ∆E
14.3 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
14.2 ∆E
11 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
16.4 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
2.8 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
5 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
15.5 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy A15: 8.82 ∆E min: 2.83 - max: 16.44 ∆E
ColorChecker
30.2 ∆E
54 ∆E
39.3 ∆E
34.1 ∆E
45.4 ∆E
60 ∆E
52.4 ∆E
36.1 ∆E
43.8 ∆E
28.5 ∆E
63.6 ∆E
63 ∆E
31.5 ∆E
46.3 ∆E
37.8 ∆E
74.7 ∆E
44.1 ∆E
41.2 ∆E
82.6 ∆E
69.1 ∆E
51.5 ∆E
36.4 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
14 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy A15: 45.98 ∆E min: 13.99 - max: 82.6 ∆E

配件和保修 - 充电器需额外购买

制造商不提供充电器,包装盒内只有一根 USB 线、一个 SIM 卡工具和最重要的文件。您可以在亚马逊的制造商网上商店购买相应的 25 瓦充电器,价格约为 15 美元

如果在欧盟购买三星智能手机,可享受 24 个月的保修服务。制造商提供多种维修选择,如移动服务团队或许多大城市的维修中心。

输入设备和操作 - 快速指纹传感器

90 赫兹的显示频率让触摸屏的操作更加流畅,因为显示屏对输入的响应速度更快。此外,动作看起来更清晰,让你在快速滚动时仍能识别细节。

机身右侧是物理按键,包括待机键和音量摇杆。手指很容易就能感觉到它们的存在,而且按人体工学设计的按键位置也适合左撇子用户。指纹识别器集成在待机键中。它响应可靠,解锁智能手机时没有任何延迟。

人脸识别也可作为解锁智能手机的生物识别方法,在光线充足的条件下也能可靠地工作。在黑暗环境中,显示屏的反射光足以识别人脸,不过在这种情况下,如果使用指纹传感器,解锁效果会更好。

键盘 - 纵向
键盘 - 纵向
键盘 - 横向
键盘 - 横向

显示屏 - AMOLED 显示屏,亮度高,频率为 90 Hz

子像素网格
子像素网格

虽然 AMOLED 显示屏并不是这个价位的必然选择,但三星还是决定在Galaxy A15 4G 中使用 AMOLED 显示屏,从而为购买提供了一个很好的理由。该面板的分辨率为 2340x1.080,刷新率为 90 Hz,我们测得的平均最大亮度为 711 cd/m²,也非常适合更昂贵的智能手机。

亮度还不足以完美显示 HDR 内容。不过,正如我们使用光谱光度计和 CalMAN 软件测试所显示的那样,在较小的区域,亮度仍有可能稍高一些。无论如何,这款手机的显示效果还是很吸引人的,色彩鲜艳,对比度良好。

691
cd/m²
689
cd/m²
702
cd/m²
713
cd/m²
731
cd/m²
740
cd/m²
723
cd/m²
719
cd/m²
695
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 740 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 711.4 cd/m² Minimum: 1.7 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 731 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.31 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 1.7 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
100% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.091
Samsung Galaxy A15
Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.50
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.67
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
PLS, 2408x1080, 6.60
Nokia G22
IPS, 1600x720, 6.52
Motorola Moto G54
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.50
Screen
27%
-215%
-71%
-62%
Brightness middle
731
940
29%
465
-36%
674
-8%
492
-33%
Brightness
711
922
30%
439
-38%
641
-10%
470
-34%
Brightness Distribution
93
96
3%
89
-4%
90
-3%
90
-3%
Black Level *
0.47
0.43
0.3
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.31
1.2
48%
8.5
-268%
4.45
-93%
3.9
-69%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
3.51
2.28
35%
15.8
-350%
7.41
-111%
6.26
-78%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.7
1.4
18%
11.8
-594%
5.1
-200%
4.3
-153%
Gamma
2.091 105%
2.27 97%
2.2 100%
2.072 106%
2.275 97%
CCT
6424 101%
6503 100%
10757 60%
7799 83%
7656 85%
Contrast
989
1567
1640

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 187 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 187 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 187 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17933 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

最低亮度
最低亮度
25% 亮度
25% 亮度
50% 亮度
50% 亮度
75% 亮度
75% 亮度
100% 亮度
100% 亮度

以固定变焦级别进行系列测量,亮度设置多种多样

在测试中,我们还测量到在极低亮度水平下出现频率为 187 Hz 的闪烁。由于很难对 OLED 二极管进行调光,许多制造商使用 PWM(即短时间关闭二极管)来模拟较低的亮度。然而,这可能会导致一些问题,如某些人的头痛。因此,对此敏感的用户应在购买智能手机前亲自试用一下显示屏。

在 "自然 "模式下,色彩还原相当准确,只有明亮的绿色和蓝色色调略微偏离目标值。因此,该显示屏仍可用于专业工作。

卡尔曼灰度
卡尔曼灰度
CalMAN 色彩精度
CalMAN 色彩精度
CalMAN sRGB 色彩空间
CalMAN sRGB 色彩空间
CalMAN AdobeRGB 色彩空间
CalMAN AdobeRGB 色彩空间
CalMAN DCI P3 色彩空间
CalMAN DCI P3 色彩空间
CalMAN 饱和度
CalMAN 饱和度

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
1.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.8 ms rise
↘ 0.9 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1 ms rise
↘ 1 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.8 ms).

在室外,即使有强烈的反光,显示屏的亮度也足以保证内容的可读性。但在阴凉处工作还是会感觉舒适得多。

可视角度方面也没有任何问题。即使从侧面观看显示屏,也能清晰地看到内容。

在户外使用智能手机
在户外使用智能手机
视角
视角

性能 - 不排除有卡顿现象

联发科 联发科技 Helio G99联发科 Helio G99 是 2022 年推出的一款 SoC,最初用于一些更昂贵的设备。现在,Galaxy A15 4G 也使用它作为引擎,在同价位产品中达到了不错的性能值。我们的测试机甚至比 5G 版的功率还要大一些。

尽管一些智能手机,如 摩托罗拉 Moto G54等智能手机也表明,这个价位的手机甚至可以使用更强大的 SoC,但Galaxy A15 4G 的表现一点也不差:虽然你仍然不得不接受时不时出现的一些较小的卡顿或甚至稍长的延迟,但它们的出现比我们习惯的这个价位的手机要少得多。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (119 - 2138, n=216, last 2 years)
914 Points +66%
Motorola Moto G54
MediaTek Dimensity 7020, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
697 Points +26%
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
552 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (490 - 576, n=13)
545 Points -1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
437 Points -21%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
350 Points -37%
Nokia G22
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
310 Points -44%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 6681, n=216, last 2 years)
2997 Points +59%
Motorola Moto G54
MediaTek Dimensity 7020, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
1903 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1879 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (1670 - 1981, n=13)
1835 Points -2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
1775 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1334 Points -29%
Nokia G22
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
1318 Points -30%
Geekbench 6.2
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (193 - 2930, n=101, last 2 years)
1407 Points +93%
Motorola Moto G54
MediaTek Dimensity 7020, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
916 Points +26%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (710 - 738, n=7)
729 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
728 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
478 Points -34%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
413 Points -43%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (845 - 7408, n=101, last 2 years)
3876 Points +100%
Motorola Moto G54
MediaTek Dimensity 7020, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
2315 Points +19%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (1864 - 2065, n=7)
1995 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1942 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
1544 Points -20%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1384 Points -29%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (102602 - 1650926, n=153, last 2 years)
738503 Points +139%
Motorola Moto G54
MediaTek Dimensity 7020, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
436096 Points +41%
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
309291 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (229468 - 337968, n=6)
306552 Points -1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
300122 Points -3%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Motorola Moto G54
MediaTek Dimensity 7020, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
13268 Points +44%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4761 - 21385, n=211, last 2 years)
11762 Points +28%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (8973 - 11027, n=13)
9734 Points +6%
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
9195 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
7305 Points -21%
Nokia G22
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
6637 Points -28%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
5720 Points -38%
CrossMark - Overall
Average of class Smartphone
  (200 - 1474, n=164, last 2 years)
835 Points +59%
Motorola Moto G54
MediaTek Dimensity 7020, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
628 Points +19%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (526 - 602, n=8)
568 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
526 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
369 Points -30%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
348 Points -34%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average of class Smartphone
  (411 - 11438, n=165, last 2 years)
5745 Points +87%
Motorola Moto G54
MediaTek Dimensity 7020, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
3773 Points +23%
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
3076 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (2855 - 3120, n=8)
3023 Points -2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
2728 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2226 Points -28%
System
Average of class Smartphone
  (2376 - 16475, n=165, last 2 years)
9678 Points +44%
Motorola Moto G54
MediaTek Dimensity 7020, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
6911 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
6743 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
6320 Points -6%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (5261 - 6776, n=8)
6309 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
5104 Points -24%
Memory
Average of class Smartphone
  (670 - 12716, n=165, last 2 years)
6250 Points +72%
Motorola Moto G54
MediaTek Dimensity 7020, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
5004 Points +38%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (3454 - 4152, n=8)
3739 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
3636 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
3285 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2650 Points -27%
Graphics
Average of class Smartphone
  (697 - 58651, n=165, last 2 years)
14101 Points +404%
Motorola Moto G54
MediaTek Dimensity 7020, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
4200 Points +50%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (2683 - 3002, n=8)
2819 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2798 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
2331 Points -17%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1811 Points -35%
Web
Average of class Smartphone
  (10 - 2145, n=165, last 2 years)
1494 Points +14%
Motorola Moto G54
MediaTek Dimensity 7020, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
1394 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1306 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (1201 - 1325, n=8)
1265 Points -3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
1144 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1002 Points -23%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Average of class Smartphone
  (207 - 84787, n=149, last 2 years)
21860 Points +246%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (6323 - 9695, n=7)
8508 Points +35%
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
6323 Points
Motorola Moto G54
MediaTek Dimensity 7020, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
6014 Points -5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
4615 Points -27%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
3630 Points -43%
AImark - Score v3.x
Average of class Smartphone
  (298 - 245629, n=105, last 2 years)
17833 Points +1838%
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
920 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (877 - 982, n=6)
911 Points -1%
Motorola Moto G54
MediaTek Dimensity 7020, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
865 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
780 Points -15%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
382 Points -58%

在图形性能方面,你不应该期望太高。只有非常简单的图形任务才能在显示器的原始分辨率下真正流畅地处理。对于更高分辨率下的计算(例如使用外接显示器时),图形芯片的性能很难满足要求。

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
326 Points
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
178 Points -45%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
135 Points -59%
Nokia G22
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
112 Points -66%
Motorola Moto G54
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
Points -100%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
332 Points
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
179 Points -46%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
139 Points -58%
Nokia G22
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
114 Points -66%
Motorola Moto G54
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
Points -100%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1094 Points
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
716 Points -35%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
634 Points -42%
Nokia G22
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
413 Points -62%
Motorola Moto G54
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
Points -100%
3DMark / Wild Life Score
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1195 Points
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
706 Points -41%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
645 Points -46%
Nokia G22
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
408 Points -66%
Motorola Moto G54
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
Points -100%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics
Motorola Moto G54
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
3069 Points +33%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2410 Points +4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2321 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2315 Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics
Motorola Moto G54
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
2948 Points +25%
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2352 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1383 Points -41%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1139 Points -52%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited
Motorola Moto G54
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
2974 Points +27%
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2344 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1519 Points -35%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1290 Points -45%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Motorola Moto G54
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
3524 Points +6%
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3329 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2739 Points -18%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2694 Points -19%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2411 Points
Motorola Moto G54
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
2397 Points -1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1427 Points -41%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1178 Points -51%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Motorola Moto G54
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
2580 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2568 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1597 Points -38%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1346 Points -48%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Motorola Moto G54
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
69 fps +23%
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
56 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
40 fps -29%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
37 fps -34%
Nokia G22
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
33 fps -41%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Motorola Moto G54
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
74 fps +17%
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
63 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
45 fps -29%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
41 fps -35%
Nokia G22
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
22 fps -65%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Motorola Moto G54
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
57 fps +58%
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
36 fps
Nokia G22
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
25 fps -31%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
22 fps -39%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
22 fps -39%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Motorola Moto G54
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
62 fps +55%
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
40 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
24 fps -40%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
23 fps -42%
Nokia G22
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
14 fps -65%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Motorola Moto G54
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
33 fps +43%
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
23 fps
Nokia G22
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
17 fps -26%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
14 fps -39%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
13 fps -43%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Motorola Moto G54
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
35 fps +40%
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
25 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
16 fps -36%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
15 fps -40%
Nokia G22
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
8.7 fps -65%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Motorola Moto G54
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
18 fps +50%
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
12 fps
Nokia G22
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
9.3 fps -22%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
7.7 fps -36%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
7.6 fps -37%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Motorola Moto G54
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
19 fps +27%
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
15 fps
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
9 fps -40%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
8.8 fps -41%
Nokia G22
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.2 fps -65%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Motorola Moto G54
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
11 fps +24%
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
8.9 fps
Nokia G22
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
6.4 fps -28%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.5 fps -38%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
4.8 fps -46%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Motorola Moto G54
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
7.1 fps +20%
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.9 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3.6 fps -39%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
3.2 fps -46%
Nokia G22
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2 fps -66%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Motorola Moto G54
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
19 fps +36%
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
14 fps
Nokia G22
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
10 fps -29%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
9.5 fps -32%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
7.5 fps -46%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Motorola Moto G54
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
20 fps +25%
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
16 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
10 fps -37%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
8.5 fps -47%
Nokia G22
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.5 fps -66%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Motorola Moto G54
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
3 fps +20%
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2.5 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1.5 fps -40%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1.4 fps -44%
Nokia G22
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
0.85 fps -66%

智能手机在浏览器基准测试中取得的成绩并不差,但这在一定程度上是由于我们使用的浏览器版本较新。

在日常操作中,冲浪体验并不十分令人信服,加载大型网页的速度相当慢,图片加载需要等待一段时间也是常有的事。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 351, n=172, last 2 years)
105.8 Points +43%
Motorola Moto G54 (Chrome 118.0.5993.80)
85.936 Points +16%
Samsung Galaxy A15 (Chrome 122)
74.154 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (46.9 - 74.2, n=7)
62.5 Points -16%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G (Chrome 120)
62.375 Points -16%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE (Chrome 114)
40.02 Points -46%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (14.9 - 445, n=157, last 2 years)
107.1 runs/min +77%
Motorola Moto G54 (Chrome 118.0.5993.80)
76.5 runs/min +27%
Samsung Galaxy A15 (Chrome 122)
60.4 runs/min
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G (Chrome 120)
52.4 runs/min -13%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (24.1 - 65.5, n=7)
45.8 runs/min -24%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE (Chrome 114)
32 runs/min -47%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 202, n=159, last 2 years)
99.9 Points +28%
Motorola Moto G54 (Chrome 118.0.5993.80)
97 Points +24%
Samsung Galaxy A15 (Chrome 122)
78 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (39 - 81, n=7)
64.3 Points -18%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G (Chrome 120)
49 Points -37%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE (Chrome 114)
44 Points -44%
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (39 - 304, n=122, last 2 years)
133.1 Points +40%
Motorola Moto G54 (Chrome 118.0.5993.80)
120 Points +26%
Samsung Galaxy A15 (Chrome 122)
95 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (80 - 112, n=6)
91.8 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE (Chrome 114)
60 Points -37%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (4633 - 89112, n=210, last 2 years)
33573 Points +53%
Motorola Moto G54 (Chrome 118.0.5993.80)
28919 Points +32%
Samsung Galaxy A15 (Chrome 122)
21890 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (17228 - 25005, n=13)
20364 Points -7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G (Chrome 120)
15900 Points -27%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE (Chrome 114)
11782 Points -46%
Nokia G22 (Chrome 112)
10858 Points -50%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE (Chrome 114)
3347 ms * -67%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G (Chrome 120)
2534.6 ms * -26%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (1922 - 2444, n=7)
2145 ms * -7%
Samsung Galaxy A15 (Chrome 122)
2009.6 ms *
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=172, last 2 years)
1599 ms * +20%
Motorola Moto G54 (Chrome 118.0.5993.80)
1399.8 ms * +30%

* ... smaller is better

Galaxy A15 4G 使用 UFS 2.2 存储,与之相比 Galaxy A15 5G相比,由于采用了快速存储控制器,A15 4G 在读取模式下能充分发挥存储速度的潜力。不过,在写入存储空间时,速度会稍慢一些。

Samsung Galaxy A15Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4GSamsung Galaxy A14 LTENokia G22Motorola Moto G54Average 128 GB UFS 2.2 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-2%
-70%
-26%
17%
-15%
52%
Sequential Read 256KB
967.8
909.8
-6%
298.69
-69%
881
-9%
983.01
2%
Sequential Write 256KB
488.5
606.3
24%
200.17
-59%
367
-25%
817.55
67%
Random Read 4KB
233.2
177.1
-24%
55.9
-76%
131
-44%
232.74
0%
Random Write 4KB
229.6
228
-1%
55.86
-76%
172
-25%
224.58
-2%
182.5 ?(68.8 - 419, n=61)
-21%
Samsung Galaxy A15Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4GMotorola Moto G54Average 128 GB UFS 2.2 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
PCMark for Android
1%
70%
6%
110%
Storage 2.0 seq. read int.
775 ?(3.0.4061)
586 ?(3.0.4061)
-24%
549 ?(339 - 859, n=11)
-29%
Storage 2.0 seq. write int.
509 ?(3.0.4061)
436 ?(3.0.4061)
-14%
Storage 2.0 random read int.
18.2 ?(3.0.4061)
30.8 ?(3.0.4061)
69%
27.7 ?(18.2 - 35, n=11)
52%
Storage 2.0 random write int.
30.8 ?(3.0.4061)
22.2 ?(3.0.4061)
-28%
Storage 2.0
16137 ?(3.0.4061)
16582 ?(3.0.4061)
3%
27461
70%

游戏 - 有限游戏

三星Galaxy A15 4G 并不是一款真正的游戏冠军,它缺乏运行高要求游戏所需的动力。当我们使用GameBench 的应用程序进行测量时,我们多次看到《PUBG Mobile》的帧速率有所下降。.

由于严重卡顿,《源氏冲击》几乎无法玩下去。如果你仍要尝试,至少应使用最低图形设置。

因此,只有在玩一些简单的休闲游戏时,你才能享受用智能手机玩游戏的乐趣。这太糟糕了,因为使用触摸屏和传感器进行控制的效果非常好。

PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile
源泉冲击
源泉冲击
0510152025303540Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy A15; Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps; 4.5.0_21307647_21321795: Ø26 (2-36)
Samsung Galaxy A15; Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps; 4.5.0_21307647_21321795: Ø17 (1-30)
Samsung Galaxy A15; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 3.1.0: Ø37.7 (2-41)
Samsung Galaxy A15; PUBG Mobile; HD; 3.1.0: Ø28.4 (1-31)

排放物 - 智能手机会发热

温度

我们测量了Galaxy A15 4G 的温度,看看它在高负荷下是否会发热。事实上,我们测量到的表面温度高达 45.5 °C(113.9 °F),触摸起来已经感觉不舒服了。我们测量的是室温,因此在炎热的夏天,智能手机的发热量可能会更高。

性能基本不受影响。即使在使用 3DMark 进行压力测试时出现了一些微小的性能下降,但在下一次运行基准测试时很快就会得到平衡。

Max. Load
 43.8 °C42.7 °C33.8 °C 
 44.8 °C39.8 °C33.8 °C 
 43.8 °C36.6 °C33.9 °C 
Maximum: 44.8 °C
Average: 39.2 °C
34 °C36.5 °C43.1 °C
34.3 °C36.9 °C45.5 °C
33.8 °C37.8 °C45.4 °C
Maximum: 45.5 °C
Average: 38.6 °C
Power Supply (max.)  43.2 °C | Room Temperature 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.2 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.8 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.5 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23 °C / 73 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.1 %
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99 % 0%
Nokia G22
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
96.8 % -2%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
96.4 % -3%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
96.4 % -3%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
98.7 % +3%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
95.6 % 0%
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
95.6 %
01234567Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy A15 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø2.05 (1.992-2.08)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø0.814 (0.81-0.82)
Samsung Galaxy A15 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.47 (7.42-7.49)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø3.91 (3.89-3.93)
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø4.29 (4.15-4.31)
Nokia G22 Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø2.5 (2.44-2.52)
热图 - 正面
热图 - 正面
热图 - 背面
热图 - 背面

发言人

底部有一个单声道扬声器,声音相对较大。但是,由于高音过于突出,它很难适合听音乐或看电影。

如果通过耳机或 3.5 毫米音频接口或蓝牙连接的扬声器聆听,声音会带来更多享受。不过,那些喜欢在无线连接中使用更特殊或可能更高质量音频编解码器的人会感到失望,因为除了自己的 SSC 外,三星只提供 SBC、AAC、aptX 和 LDAC。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.639.12537.637.53130.729.94033.432.55038.439.96324.527.48016.521.810015.82212513.130.516014.638.42008.6412507.846.13157.251.54008.557.150010.159.963010.960.680010.968.9100012.668.312509.17516009.673200010.173.2250010.869.1315012.769.1400013.270.3500015.270.8630014.373.9800015.377.61000016.166.41250016.358.21600017.252.7SPL24.983.8N0.657.2median 12.6median 66.4Delta2.99.540.845.83737.331.728.432.533.136.43628.92724.420.523.721.224.129.720.137.613.640.212.646.912.75011.254.313.562.314.766.31466.413.672.112.670.31169.610.867.211.567.913.865.71567.815.667.416.265.817.263.117.866.517.160.717.85726.779.70.845.5median 14median 65.72.49.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy A15Motorola Moto G54
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy A15 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 40% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 59% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Motorola Moto G54 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 46% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 - 适合日常使用的续航能力

耗电量

Galaxy A15 4G 的功耗总体上相当适中。特别是在满载情况下,尽管功率发展不错,但功耗却相当低,这一点可以让您感到欣慰。

如果电池电量耗尽,您可以使用高达 25 瓦的功率为电池充电。虽然没有随附充电器,但各种充电器(如Apple,Honor 或摩托罗拉的充电器)都能顺利工作,在两小时内将设备从 0 充至 100%。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.1 / 1.2 / 1.5 Watt
Load midlight 2.9 / 4.8 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Samsung Galaxy A15
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
5000 mAh
Motorola Moto G54
5000 mAh
Average Mediatek Helio G99
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-19%
-41%
-3%
-41%
-35%
Idle Minimum *
1.1
1.1
-0%
0.89
19%
0.9
18%
0.89 ?(0.7 - 1.1, n=7)
19%
Idle Average *
1.2
1.3
-8%
2.31
-93%
1.2
-0%
1.864 ?(1.1 - 4.02, n=7)
-55%
Idle Maximum *
1.5
1.5
-0%
2.34
-56%
1.5
-0%
2.12 ?(1.33 - 4.07, n=7)
-41%
Load Average *
2.9
3.6
-24%
4.11
-42%
3.3
-14%
5.18 ?(2.9 - 7.49, n=7)
-79%
Load Maximum *
4.8
7.8
-63%
6.46
-35%
5.6
-17%
7.19 ?(4.8 - 10.1, n=7)
-50%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

00.20.50.711.21.51.71.92.22.42.72.93.13.43.63.94.14.44.6Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy A15; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø2.82 (1.125-4.84)
Samsung Galaxy A15; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.254 (1.128-1.485)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

00.10.30.40.60.70.911.21.31.51.61.81.92.12.22.42.52.72.8Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy A15; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø2.55 (2.16-2.95)
Samsung Galaxy A15; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.254 (1.128-1.485)

电池寿命

与前代产品相比,三星Galaxy A15 4G 的电池续航时间大幅增加,还超过了几款对比设备,如 小米Redmi Note 13 4G.不过,总体而言,它只能在同价位的对比设备中处于中等水平。

在无线局域网测试中,我们测得的续航时间为 14:45 小时,因此那些想在雨天用智能手机上网的人无需充电。

这款智能手机尤其适合电影迷,例如,在播放从流媒体应用程序下载的内置存储视频文件时,其续航时间甚至略微超过 24 小时。因此,即使是完整的《指环王》加长版或全部 8 部《哈利-波特》电影也不会对电池造成任何问题。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
27h 02min
WiFi Websurfing
14h 45min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
24h 06min
Load (maximum brightness)
5h 58min
Samsung Galaxy A15
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
5000 mAh
Nokia G22
5050 mAh
Motorola Moto G54
5000 mAh
Battery Runtime
-9%
-15%
19%
18%
Reader / Idle
1622
1509
-7%
1170
-28%
3481
115%
H.264
1446
1358
-6%
1044
-28%
1041
-28%
WiFi v1.3
885
742
-16%
896
1%
1052
19%
875
-1%
Load
358
334
-7%
348
-3%
301
-16%

Pros

+ 明亮的 AMOLED 显示屏
+ 近距离无线通信
+ 快速更新
+ 快速携带
+ 精确定位
+ 闪烁手指传感器
+ 实用的使用时间
+ 超强闪光灯...

Cons

- 厚度较小的铆钉包
- 厚度较小的铆钉包
- 包装中没有标签
- 更新不及时
- 在最后期限前具有较高的使用寿命

结论:适合日常使用的优秀智能手机

测试三星Galaxy A15 4G。测试设备由 cyberport.de 提供
测试三星Galaxy A15 4G。测试设备由 cyberport.de 提供

尽管选择 LTE 版Galaxy A15 的用户无法获得最新的移动通信标准,但他们可以比 5G 版节省一些费用,同时在日常使用中获得略高的性能,而无需在许多其他方面做出任何妥协。

机壳完全相同。它坚固耐用,做工精良,但也容易留下指纹。亮丽的 AMOLED 屏幕刷新率高达每秒 90 帧,充电性能也是如此,最高可达 25 瓦,在同类产品中速度相当快。

更新保证期很长,尤其是考虑到不到 200 欧元(约合 215 美元)的相当低廉的价格。不过,你还是应该注意,三星故意让承诺的措辞非常模糊,所以你并不能完全依赖它。

这款智能手机还具有一些额外的优势,如相当精确的定位功能、超广角摄像头和良好的电池续航能力。另一方面,你还必须考虑到你需要单独购买充电器,设备在负载情况下会变得相当热,而且你必须在双 SIM 卡和共享卡槽的 microSD 卡之间做出选择。

在价格低于 200 欧元(约合 215 美元)的智能手机中,三星Galaxy A15 的 4G 版本也是一个不错的选择,尤其是其明亮的 AMOLED 屏幕、快速的充电速度和良好的存储设备。

配备 Galaxy A15 配备 5G目前的价格要高出 20 至 30 欧元(约合 22 至 32 美元),因此需要更快移动连接的用户也可以考虑一下。摩托罗拉 摩托罗拉 Moto G54功率更大,但没有 AMOLED 显示屏。

价格和供应情况

三星在美国的在线商店只提供5G 型号,售价约为 200 美元。.

而 4G 版本在亚马逊等在线商店的售价约为 160 美元。

Samsung Galaxy A15 - 04/01/2024 v7
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
82%
Keyboard
65 / 75 → 87%
Pointing Device
88%
Connectivity
47 / 70 → 68%
Weight
88%
Battery
92%
Display
91%
Games Performance
27 / 64 → 42%
Application Performance
70 / 86 → 81%
Temperature
88%
Noise
100%
Audio
68 / 90 → 76%
Camera
58%
Average
74%
80%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Transparency

The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 三星Galaxy A15 4G 智能手机评测--价格低廉,功能强大,适合日常使用
Florian Schmitt, 2024-04- 3 (Update: 2024-04- 3)