结论 - 硬件不错，软件功能有限
Asus Googlebook 14 给人的感觉是一款高端商务笔记本电脑，考虑到它基于出色的 ExpertBook Ultra 打造，这一点并不令人意外。它拥有高品质且轻巧的机身（重量不到 1 千克），不过对部分用户来说，它可能确实有点过于轻盈，反而缺少高端质感。打字体验也因此略受影响，但按键键程和输入精准度都非常令人满意。得益于 Intel 处理器，它不仅性能充足，还支持 Thunderbolt 4 连接，配备常规 USB-A 接口，并支持 Wi-Fi 7。电池续航仍算尚可（尽管低于平均水平），而且大部分时间运行都非常安静。
不过，目前软件仍存在一些问题。并非所有 Android 应用都能正常运行，我们也无法通过一部较新的 Android 17 智能手机使用扩展功能（接力、应用共享），而且屏幕的表现有些奇怪，黑位偏高，色域仅限于 sRGB，看起来更像是 IPS 面板。色彩准确度也不佳，因此不建议用它编辑图片。
考虑到较低的 TDP，以及只能使用 Android 应用的限制，完全没有必要购买搭载更快的 Core Ultra 7 355 的配置版本；在内存和 SSD 容量相同的情况下，它比 Core Ultra 5 325 配置版本贵约 300 美元。
总而言之，你得到的是一款非常轻巧、适合在 Android 生态系统内处理日常任务的随身设备，但 Googlebook OS 的功能有限，而且没有内置 5G 连接功能也令人遗憾。
Pros
Cons
- $27.99Smatree M37T Hard Protective 14 inch Laptop Sleeve Case for DELL/ASUS | for DELL Precision 5470/5490,Yoga Slim 7i Ultra Aura/XPS 14 DA14260,ASUS Googlebook 14 CX9406CAA/ExpertBook Ultra(X8030T)
- $49.99Smatree MS37T Hard Protective 14 inch Laptop Sleeve Case for DELL/ASUS | for 14 inch DELL Precision 5470/5490 Workstation,XPS 14 DA14260,ASUS ExpertBook Ultra/Googlebook 14 CX9406CAA
- $269.17ASUS Chromebook Plus CX34 Laptop with Google AI, 14" Display (1920x1080), Intel® Core™ i3-1215U Processor, 8GB RAM, 256GB UFS Storage, ChromeOS, White, CX3402CBA-DH386-WH
规格参数
机身、连接性和输入设备
Asus Googlebook 采用 Expertbook Ultra 的机身，但配色为深炭灰色。它的外观很出色（尽管我们对顶盖上的灯条仍持保留意见），而且指纹实际上并不是什么大问题。机身稳固性和做工也都很出色，重量仅为 967 克。不过，这也可能略微影响质感，因为对部分用户而言，它或许有些过于轻了。较轻的重量也略微影响了打字体验（键程 1.5 毫米，电源按钮集成指纹识别器），敲击声也稍大，但总体表现仍然很好，触觉反馈触控板同样如此。维护范围仅限于风扇、电池和 M.2-2280 SSD。
它支持 Wi-Fi 7，并提供丰富的接口，包括 Thunderbolt 4、常规 USB-A 接口以及 HDMI。不过，它不支持 5G 连接，1080p 网络摄像头（配有机械隐私遮挡盖）的成像效果也只是一般。
显示屏 - 120 Hz 哑光 OLED 触摸屏
Asus 采用了一块 14 英寸雾面 OLED 触摸屏，分辨率为 2880 x 1800 像素，刷新率为 120 Hz。不过，Googlebooks OS 似乎存在一些软件问题，我们使用专业 CalMAN 软件进行分析时测得的结果未达到预期。主观画质不错，虽然雾面涂层会让明亮的画面略显颗粒感，但由于反光减少，在明亮环境下的显示效果要好得多。一个问题是黑位偏高，因此对比度低于 OLED 面板应有的水平。
我们的测量结果显示，SDR 最高亮度超过 500 尼特，同时也支持 HDR 内容，峰值亮度为 1266 尼特。HDR 处理似乎也能正常工作，显示 HDR 内容时，面板会直接使用更高的亮度（类似于 macOS）。不过，色彩校准完全失准，而且 Asus Googlebook OS 运行在 sRGB 模式下。我们希望后续能通过软件更新修复这一问题。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 95 %
Center on Battery: 525 cd/m²
Contrast: 1250:1 (Black: 0.42 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 3.5 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.69}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 5.6 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.94}
71.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
71.1% sRGB (Argyll 3D)
93.8% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 1.99
CCT: 6913 K
| Asus Googlebook 14 CX9406CAA OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | HP Googlebook 14c OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | Apple MacBook Air 13 M5 IPS, 2560x1664, 13.6", 60 Hz | Lenovo ThinkBook 14x, ILL, Ultra 5 226V TM140VDXY02, IPS, 1920x1200, 14", 120 Hz | Microsoft Surface Laptop 8 13.8 LQ138P1JX61, IPS, 2304x1536, 13.8", 120 Hz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 14% | 22% | 2% | 21% | |
| HDR Peak Brightness (cd/m²) | 1266 | ||||
| Display P3 Coverage (%) | 93.8 | 83.2 -11% | 98.1 5% | 69.3 -26% | 96.5 3% |
| sRGB Coverage (%) | 71.1 | 100 41% | 98.6 39% | 92.2 30% | 97.8 38% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage (%) | 71.5 | 80.6 13% | 86.8 21% | 72.9 2% | 86.5 21% |
| Response Times | -3% | -2038% | -3142% | -2726% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 2.6 ? | 2 ? 23% | 24.3 ? -835% | 36.2 ? -1292% | 38.8 ? -1392% |
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 0.44 ? | 0.5 ? -14% | 14.7 ? -3241% | 22.4 ? -4991% | 18.3 ? -4059% |
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | 720 ? | 960 ? | |||
| PWM Amplitude * (%) | 44 | 52 -18% | |||
| Screen | 268% | 19% | 14% | 31% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 525 | 515 -2% | 546 4% | 349 -34% | 617 18% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 527 | 519 -2% | 519 -2% | 322 -39% | 623 18% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 95 | 98 3% | 90 -5% | 82 -14% | 91 -4% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.42 | 0.02 95% | 0.38 10% | 0.18 57% | 0.44 -5% |
| Contrast (:1) | 1250 | 25750 1960% | 1437 15% | 1939 55% | 1402 12% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.5 | 2.9 17% | 2.1 40% | 2.62 25% | 0.9 74% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.6 | 6.2 18% | 4 47% | 5.56 27% | 2.2 71% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.6 | 2.7 52% | 3.3 41% | 3.61 36% | 2 64% |
| Gamma | 1.99 111% | 2.27 97% | 2.22 99% | 2.33 94% | 2.19 100% |
| CCT | 6913 94% | 6483 100% | 7127 91% | 7223 90% | 6810 95% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.9 | 6.46 | |||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 93% /
155% | -666% /
-297% | -1042% /
-474% | -891% /
-395% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0.44 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.24 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (19.6 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 2.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1.3 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 1.3 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.13 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 13 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (30.7 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 720 Hz Amplitude: 44 % | ≤ 99 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 720 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 720 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7594 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
性能 - Intel Panther Lake
Asus Googlebook 14 搭载 Intel Core Ultra 7 355，根据我们的功耗测量结果，其 TDP 应该会在最初几秒内达到 45 瓦，然后在持续负载下维持在 18 瓦左右。因此，相比 Core Ultra 5 325 配置版本，额外加价购买这一版本并不划算。配备 16 GB 内存和 512 GB 存储空间的版本整体性能足够，Googlebook 14 的系统响应总体上也很敏捷。我们进行了一些基准测试（参见下方列表），但 Android 上可进行的测试有限，而且 Googlebook OS 不支持某些基准测试（例如 CrossMark）。PUBG 或 Fortnite 等一些热门游戏也存在不受支持的情况。
Geekbench 6.7: Multi-Core | Single-Core
WebXPRT 4: Overall
WebXPRT 5: Overall
3DMark: Steel Nomad Light Score | Wild Life Extreme
Geekbench AI: Single Precision CPU 1.7 | Half Precision CPU 1.7 | Quantized CPU 1.7
| Geekbench 7.0 / Multi-Core | |
| Average of class Office (10821 - 17682, n=6, last 2 years) | |
| HP Googlebook 14c | |
| Asus Googlebook 14 CX9406CAA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 355 (n=1) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14x, ILL, Ultra 5 226V | |
| Geekbench 7.0 / Single-Core | |
| HP Googlebook 14c | |
| Average of class Office (2433 - 2643, n=6, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Googlebook 14 CX9406CAA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 355 (n=1) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14x, ILL, Ultra 5 226V | |
| Geekbench 6.7 / Multi-Core | |
| Apple MacBook Air 13 M5 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 8 13.8 | |
| HP Googlebook 14c | |
| Average of class Office (757 - 17846, n=84, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 355 (6354 - 11702, n=7) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14x, ILL, Ultra 5 226V | |
| Asus Googlebook 14 CX9406CAA | |
| Geekbench 6.7 / Single-Core | |
| Apple MacBook Air 13 M5 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 8 13.8 | |
| HP Googlebook 14c | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14x, ILL, Ultra 5 226V | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 355 (1585 - 2769, n=7) | |
| Average of class Office (462 - 2988, n=85, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Googlebook 14 CX9406CAA | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| Apple MacBook Air 13 M5 | |
| Asus Googlebook 14 CX9406CAA | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 8 13.8 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 355 (244 - 350, n=7) | |
| HP Googlebook 14c | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14x, ILL, Ultra 5 226V | |
| Average of class Office (104.2 - 350, n=81, last 2 years) | |
| WebXPRT 5 / Overall | |
| Apple MacBook Air 13 M5 | |
| Average of class Office (86 - 124, n=15, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 355 (98 - 117, n=6) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14x, ILL, Ultra 5 226V | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 8 13.8 | |
| Asus Googlebook 14 CX9406CAA | |
| HP Googlebook 14c | |
| 3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score | |
| Apple MacBook Air 13 M5 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 8 13.8 | |
| Average of class Office (463 - 7571, n=35, last 2 years) | |
| HP Googlebook 14c | |
| Asus Googlebook 14 CX9406CAA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 355 (n=1) | |
| 3DMark / Wild Life Extreme | |
| Apple MacBook Air 13 M5 | |
| HP Googlebook 14c | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 8 13.8 | |
| Asus Googlebook 14 CX9406CAA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 355 (n=1) | |
| Average of class Office (343 - 8047, n=40, last 2 years) | |
| Geekbench AI / Single Precision CPU 1.7 | |
| HP Googlebook 14c | |
| Apple MacBook Air 13 M5 | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14x, ILL, Ultra 5 226V | |
| Average of class Office (1515 - 5281, n=11, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Googlebook 14 CX9406CAA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 355 (n=1) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 8 13.8 | |
| Geekbench AI / Half Precision CPU 1.7 | |
| Apple MacBook Air 13 M5 | |
| HP Googlebook 14c | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 8 13.8 | |
| Average of class Office (812 - 8079, n=11, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Googlebook 14 CX9406CAA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 355 (n=1) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14x, ILL, Ultra 5 226V | |
| Geekbench AI / Quantized CPU 1.7 | |
| HP Googlebook 14c | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 8 13.8 | |
| Apple MacBook Air 13 M5 | |
| Average of class Office (2143 - 8706, n=11, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14x, ILL, Ultra 5 226V | |
| Asus Googlebook 14 CX9406CAA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 355 (n=1) | |
排放与功耗
系统噪声
Asus 仅为 Googlebook 14 配备了一个风扇，但这已绰绰有余。这款笔记本电脑通常运行安静，只有在高负载下才能听到轻微的风扇声。我们也没有听到任何其他电子噪声。
Noise level
| Idle |
| 24 / 24 / 24 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 26.2 / 34.7 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24 dB(A) | ||
| Asus Googlebook 14 CX9406CAA Ultra 7 355, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL | HP Googlebook 14c SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | Apple MacBook Air 13 M5 M5 10-Core, M5 8-Core GPU | Lenovo ThinkBook 14x, ILL, Ultra 5 226V Core Ultra 5 226V, Arc 130V | Microsoft Surface Laptop 8 13.8 SD X2 Plus X2P-64-100, Adreno X2-45 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -5% | -13% | -6% | ||
| off / environment * (dB) | 24 | 24.8 -3% | 24.9 -4% | 25.1 -5% | |
| Idle Minimum * (dB) | 24 | 24.8 -3% | 24.9 -4% | 25.1 -5% | |
| Idle Average * (dB) | 24 | 24.8 -3% | 24.9 -4% | 25.1 -5% | |
| Idle Maximum * (dB) | 24 | 24.8 -3% | 25 -4% | 25.1 -5% | |
| Load Average * (dB) | 26.2 | 29.6 -13% | 35.4 -35% | 25.1 4% | |
| Load Maximum * (dB) | 34.7 | 37.2 -7% | 44.9 -29% | 42.4 -22% | |
| Witcher 3 ultra * (dB) | 35.2 | ||||
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (dB) | 44.9 | 37.4 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
日常使用时的表面温度很低，即使在满载情况下，我们测得的温度也未超过 39 °C，因此这方面完全没有问题。
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.9 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 34.4 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.2 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.6 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.4 °C / 81.3 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.6 °C / 81.7 F (+0.2 °C / 0.4 F).
| Asus Googlebook 14 CX9406CAA Ultra 7 355, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL | HP Googlebook 14c SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | Apple MacBook Air 13 M5 M5 10-Core, M5 8-Core GPU | Lenovo ThinkBook 14x, ILL, Ultra 5 226V Core Ultra 5 226V, Arc 130V | Microsoft Surface Laptop 8 13.8 SD X2 Plus X2P-64-100, Adreno X2-45 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -14% | 2% | -8% | -2% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * (°C) | 38.9 | 50.8 -31% | 44.1 -13% | 39.4 -1% | 44.4 -14% |
| Maximum Bottom * (°C) | 37.2 | 51.6 -39% | 42.4 -14% | 39.1 -5% | 42.5 -14% |
| Idle Upper Side * (°C) | 28.7 | 26.4 8% | 23.7 17% | 32.3 -13% | 25.9 10% |
| Idle Bottom * (°C) | 28.9 | 26.6 8% | 23.8 18% | 32.8 -13% | 26 10% |
* ... smaller is better
扬声器
配备六个扬声器的音响系统音质出色，明显优于竞争对手。
Asus Googlebook 14 CX9406CAA audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (7.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 136%
HP Googlebook 14c audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 6% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 136%
Apple MacBook Air 13 M5 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 14% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 9% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 136%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14x, ILL, Ultra 5 226V audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 69% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 57% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 136%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 8 13.8 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 15% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 10% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 136%
功耗和电池续航时间
Googlebook 14 在空闲状态下的能效很高，但这也得益于默认的深色壁纸。使用较亮的图像时，OLED 屏幕的功耗也会增加。在负载下，我们测得功耗曾在几秒内高达 66 瓦，但很快就降至仅 27 瓦。
配备 70 Wh 电池的续航表现低于平均水平：在我们的 Wi-Fi 测试中，屏幕亮度为 150 尼特时约可续航 13 小时，全亮度下则约为 8 小时。
| Off / Standby | 0.31 / 0.48 Watt |
| Idle | 2.8 / 3.7 / 3.8 Watt |
| Load |
35.5 / 66.8 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Asus Googlebook 14 CX9406CAA Ultra 7 355, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL, Micron 2650 MTFDKBA512TGW, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | HP Googlebook 14c SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEQNSJ-512G-1002, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Apple MacBook Air 13 M5 M5 10-Core, M5 8-Core GPU, Apple SSD AP0512Z, IPS, 2560x1664, 13.6" | Lenovo ThinkBook 14x, ILL, Ultra 5 226V Core Ultra 5 226V, Arc 130V, SAMSUNG MZAMX512HDLV-00BL2, IPS, 1920x1200, 14" | Microsoft Surface Laptop 8 13.8 SD X2 Plus X2P-64-100, Adreno X2-45, SK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N, IPS, 2304x1536, 13.8" | Average Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU | Average of class Office | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 13% | -38% | -58% | -23% | -30% | -53% | |
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 2.8 | 2.3 18% | 1.8 36% | 3.9 -39% | 1.7 39% | 2.8 ? -0% | 3.99 ? -43% |
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 3.7 | 3.6 3% | 9.3 -151% | 6.4 -73% | 6.8 -84% | 5.31 ? -44% | 6.95 ? -88% |
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 3.8 | 3.7 3% | 9.4 -147% | 10.3 -171% | 7.5 -97% | 7.12 ? -87% | 8.15 ? -114% |
| Load Average * (Watt) | 35.5 | 22.5 37% | 29.4 17% | 42.9 -21% | 28 21% | 39.3 ? -11% | 43.9 ? -24% |
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 66.8 | 64.2 4% | 30.4 54% | 59 12% | 61.3 8% | 72.6 ? -9% | 65.1 ? 3% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (Watt) | 18.9 | 42.9 | 37.9 | ||||
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * (Watt) | 17.7 | 43 | 38.1 |
* ... smaller is better
Notebookcheck 评分
Asus Googlebook 14 CX9406CAA
- 10/15/2026 v8
Andreas Osthoff
Total Sustainability Score: 对比中的潜在竞争对手
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 86.5%  | Asus Googlebook 14 CX9406CAA Intel Core Ultra 7 355 ⎘ Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $27.99 Smatree M37T Hard Protective... 2. $49.99 Smatree MS37T Hard Protectiv... 3. $269.17 ASUS Chromebook Plus CX34 La... List Price: 1699€ | 967 g | 16.5 mm | 14.00" 2880x1800 243 PPI OLED |
2. 86.2%  | HP Googlebook 14c Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 ⎘ Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $269.90 HP - 14"" 2-in-1 Touchscreen... List Price: 1199€ | 1.3 kg | 10.9 mm | 14.00" 2880x1800 243 PPI OLED |
3. 91.6%  | Apple MacBook Air 13 M5 Apple M5 10-Core ⎘ Apple M5 8-Core GPU ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | List Price: 1199€ | 1.2 kg | 11.3 mm | 13.60" 2560x1664 225 PPI IPS |
4. 84.8%  | Lenovo ThinkBook 14x, ILL, Ultra 5 226V Intel Core Ultra 5 226V ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 130V ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | List Price: 949€ | 1 kg | 15.6 mm | 14.00" 1920x1200 162 PPI IPS |
5. 88.4%  | Microsoft Surface Laptop 8 13.8 Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Plus X2P-64-100 ⎘ Qualcomm SD X2 Adreno X2-45 ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | List Price: 1699€ | 1.3 kg | 17.5 mm | 13.80" 2304x1536 201 PPI IPS |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Add as a preferred source on Google
