华为P60 Pro评测--即使没有徕卡也是一款强大的相机智能手机

Name: Huawei P60 Pro
Brand: Huawei

王牌相机。 华为P60 Pro完全专注于摄影，旨在进一步提高上一代已经很好的低光能力--特别是当涉及其潜望镜相机时。此外，这款高端智能手机旨在以其不寻常的设计给人留下深刻印象。这篇评论将告诉你这款手机是否是华为完成的一项工作。

Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 06/02/2023 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android Smartphone Touchscreen

华为P60 Pro是P50 Pro的直接继任者。P50 Pro并一直是中国制造商的旗舰相机智能手机。从价格上看，它位于P60系列的中间位置，截至目前，它是该系列中唯一可在西方市场购买的机型。这款手机P60 Art其特点包括更好的相机，更大的电池和更多的存储空间，可能会在以后的日子里跟进。华为华为P60仍然只能在中国市场上购买。

华为P60 Pro的两个存储版本都可以在欧洲购买。配备8GB内存和256GB内部存储的机型售价1179美元，配备12/512GB的机型目前售价1299美元。

这款华为智能手机没有谷歌服务和5G--与过去几年的情况一样。在这篇评论中，你可以发现这款手机是否还值得购买。

Test device courtesy of Huawei Germany

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Huawei P60 Pro (P60 Series)

Processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 8 x 1.8 - 3.2 GHz, Cortex-X2 / A710 / A510 (Kryo) Waipio

Graphics adapter

Qualcomm Adreno 730

Memory

8 GB

Display

6.67 inch 19.92:9, 2700 x 1220 pixel 444 PPI, Capacitive, 300 Hz touch sampling rate, LTPO 1 - 120 Hz, 1440 Hz PWM-Dimming, OLED, Kunlun Glass, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz

Storage

256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 256 GB

Connections

1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: USB-C, Card Reader: NanoMemory up to 256 GB (FAT, FAT32, exFAT), 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, color spectrum, hall, barometer, gravity, OTG, IR-Blaster

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.2, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (Band 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 19), LTE (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 8.3 x 161 x 74.5

Battery

4815 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 88W SuperCharge

Charging

wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Huawei HarmonyOS

Camera

Primary Camera: 48 MPix (f/1.4-f/4.0, 25 mm, OIS) + 48 MPix (3.5x optical zoom, f/2.1, 90 mm, OIS) + 13 MPix (f/2.2, 13 mm); Video: 2160p @ 60 FPS; Camera2-API-Level: Full
Secondary Camera: 13 MPix (f/2.4)

Additional features

Speakers: Dual, Keyboard: OnScreen, SIM-Tool, USB-Cabel, 88W-Charger, 24 Months Warranty, DRM Widevine L1; Head-SAR: 0.50 W/kg, Body-SAR: 1.20 W/kg; GNSS: GPS (L1, L2), AGPS, Glonass (L1), BeiDou (B1, B1C, B2a, B2b), Galileo (E1, E5a, E5b), QZSS (L1, L5), NavIC (L5), fanless, waterproof

Weight

200 g, Power Supply: 149 g

Price

1199 Euro

Links

Huawei homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Drive	Size	Resolution
88.8 %	06/2023	Huawei P60 Pro SD 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730	200 g	256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.67"	2700x1220
91.1 %	03/2023	Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740	233 g	256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6.80"	3080x1440
90.3 %	01/2023	Apple iPhone 14 Pro A16, A16 GPU 5-Core	206 g	256 GB NVMe	6.10"	2556x1179
89.2 %	03/2023	Xiaomi 13 Pro SD 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740	229 g	256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6.73"	3200x1440
90.1 %	07/2023	Honor Magic5 Pro SD 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740	219 g	512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6.81"	2848x1312
89.1 %	11/2022	Google Pixel 7 Pro Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7	212 g	128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.70"	3120x1440

表壳 - 光滑的背面和昆仑玻璃

在亚洲之外，华为P60 Pro有黑色和洛可可珍珠色。紫色和绿色只在亚洲市场提供。我们的测试设备是洛可可珍珠色，并不完全是白色--相反，它有一种珠光的光泽，这对每部手机都是独一无二的。华为通过手工将矿物珠光粉涂在手机上--但是，这种技术没有进一步说明。这一特点不仅吸引人的眼球--而且拿在手里也是一种真正的快乐。

显示屏由昆仑玻璃保护--据说比普通玻璃强十倍。即便如此，这款手机还在上面安装了一个额外的屏幕保护膜。屏幕的四边都是弧形的--与在Honor Magic5 Pro 上已经看到的一样。这款手机的结构非常好--没有缝隙，结构也很光滑，除了我们的测试设备的背面和铝框之间有一个微小的缝隙。

华为P60 Pro获得了IP68认证，这意味着它可以防尘和防水。

尺寸比较

连接性 - USB 3.2和一个快速的microSD读卡器

华为P60 Pro有一个快速的USB 3.2端口（Gen 1），可以实现高数据传输率。在我们的复制测试中，这个端口的平均传输速率达到368.49MB/s。你还可以用它来输出图片--你可以镜像屏幕或利用专门的 "桌面模式"。

除此以外，这款手机还有NFC、红外辐射器以及蓝牙5.2，但遗憾的是它没有音频插孔。

微型SD卡读卡器

华为手机采用了内部的NanoMemory卡插槽，支持高达256GB以及exFAT。在我们的复制测试中，它的传输速率同样很快--尽管，在我们的跨平台磁盘测试中，速率略低于预期。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Huawei P60 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash (Huawei NanoMemory)	77.03 MB/s
Huawei P50 Pro Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash (Huawei NanoMemory)	32.78 MB/s -57%
Sony Xperia 1 IV Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	14.7 MB/s -81%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

Huawei P60 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Huawei NanoMemory: Ø49.7 (22.6-59.2)

Huawei P50 Pro Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Huawei NanoMemory: Ø37.3 (28.1-59.1)

Huawei P60 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Huawei NanoMemory: Ø61.2 (8.2-66)

Huawei P50 Pro Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Huawei NanoMemory: Ø84 (9.89-109)

软件--P60 Pro继续错过谷歌服务

在欧洲，华为P60 Pro配备了EMUI 13.1，它是基于OpenAndroid 。在亚洲市场，这款手机使用的是Harmony OS 3.1，其构建方式并没有什么不同，看起来也差不多。华为没有提供任何关于更新交付的详细信息--在过去，它一直是体面的。在测试时，最新的安全补丁是2023年3月1日的--不是完全最新的。

与过去几年一样，P60 Pro继续缺少谷歌服务和相应的应用程序。如果你看一下华为的AppGallery，许多应用程序会很熟悉--但一些美国的大公司，如Meta、Netflix和Disney，却无处可寻。你可以使用Petal搜索功能，以便从其他平台下载这些应用程序，但对于技术不熟练的人来说，这似乎是一个巨大的麻烦。一个更好的选择可能是GBox，它很容易安装，并使Play Store可以使用--这意味着你也可以选择掌握许多谷歌服务。不幸的是，这可能会导致更高的电池消耗，而且在利用这一途径时，你必须对数据保护有一点警惕性。

通信和GNSS - 没有5G的华为智能手机

华为P60 Pro支持带有VHT160的Wi-Fi 6，这意味着它可以利用2.4和5.0GHz的频率--但不是6.0GHz。通过我们的参考路由器，即华硕ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000，连接很稳定--但速度落后于我们的预期。就手机的规格而言，我们本来期望速度超过1GBit/s。

使用移动数据，你能得到的最好的是LTE，但仍然没有5G。不过，其频率覆盖范围相当好，这意味着你可以在全球范围内使用这款手机。

Networking
Huawei P60 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000	880 (min: 394) MBit/s ∼57%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	881 (min: 797) MBit/s ∼53%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1496 (min: 1387) MBit/s ∼98%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1671 (min: 801) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1754 (min: 1618) MBit/s ∼94%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1504 (min: 1343) MBit/s ∼86%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
iperf3 receive AXE11000	723 (min: 365) MBit/s ∼47%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	822 (min: 409) MBit/s ∼49%
Xiaomi 13 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000	809 (min: 780) MBit/s ∼53%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	993 (min: 972) MBit/s ∼59%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1859 (min: 919) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1637 (min: 1603) MBit/s ∼94%
Honor Magic5 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1531 (min: 1445) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1474 (min: 743) MBit/s ∼88%
Google Pixel 7 Pro Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000	904 (min: 453) MBit/s ∼59%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	945 (min: 917) MBit/s ∼57%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1645 (min: 1586) MBit/s ∼88%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1743 (min: 1585) MBit/s ∼100%
Huawei P50 Pro Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000	589 (min: 287) MBit/s ∼38%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	663 (min: 262) MBit/s ∼40%
Average of class Smartphone
iperf3 receive AXE11000	655 (min: 34.8) MBit/s ∼43%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	692 (min: 40.5) MBit/s ∼41%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1536 (min: 229) MBit/s ∼83%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1364 (min: 598) MBit/s ∼78%

Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1754 (1618-1808)

Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1504 (1343-1604)

Huawei P60 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø866 (394-947)

Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1496 (1387-1627)

Huawei P60 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø881 (797-938)

Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1645 (801-1815)

华为P60 Pro是第一款支持GNSS频段E5b（伽利略）和B2b（北斗）的智能手机。通过卫星进行定位的速度很快，而且可以迅速确定精确的位置。

我们在一次自行车旅行中，将该手机与Garmin Venu 2 。在我们10公里长的旅程中，两台设备相隔90米使用--我们注意到，P60 Pro并不像健身智能手表那样能够准确追踪我们的路线，即使它有更广泛的GNSS支持。即便如此，它在一天结束时仍然做得很好。

电话功能和通话质量

华为P60 Pro支持VoLTE和WLAN通话等功能--SIP账户控制没有在系统中实现。

将手机举到耳边，通话质量非常好，较大的环境噪音被有效过滤掉了。扬声器模式也给人留下了良好的印象--虽然有时会有一点回声。

摄像机--P60 Pro少了一个镜头

华为P60 Pro的前置摄像头可以拍出很好的自拍，其可定制的虚化效果很好地区分了主体和背景之间的界限。

而P50 Pro有一个四摄像头，而P60 Pro则少了一个镜头，并完全摆脱了单色传感器。它的主摄像头以其平衡的照片给人留下了深刻印象--手机不会过度锐化主体，照片有很好的动态。低光拍照也是可以的，但它有时对主体的勾勒有点太刺眼了。P60 Pro还具有自动光圈控制功能，可以自动在f/1.4和f/4.0之间设置光圈。你可以通过专业模式手动控制这一功能--这一功能我们已经从Mate50 Pro.

这款智能手机的超广角镜头是较好的镜头之一，尽管它只能获得12MPix--它实现了可爱的景深和良好的细节水平。潜望镜相机不仅可以获得高分辨率，它也是非常感光的，光圈为f/2.1。它有一个100倍的数字变焦，但打不是完全最好的。从10倍左右的变焦开始，你已经开始注意到相当多的不足之处--尽管如此，对于社交媒体来说已经足够好。

只要你以16:9的格式拍摄，你就可以在前置摄像头和主摄像头上以最高的超高清和60FPS录制视频。如果你想以21:9的格式录制，你就只能以全高清（60 FPS）的方式录制。HDR视频可以使用所有的分辨率和格式来记录，然而，它们被限制在30 FPS。

利用不同级别变焦的照片

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main camera Main camera Ultra-wide angle 5x zoom Low light

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

附件和保修 - 包括一个快速充电适配器

P60 Pro配备了一个88瓦的电源适配器（照片：Daniel Schmidt）。

华为P60 Pro配备了一个模块化的88瓦电源适配器，一条USB线（Type-A到Type-C），一个SIM卡工具和一个透明硅胶套。充电适配器有一个USB-A和USB-C接口--但每次只能用一个接口为设备充电。

华为手机有24个月的保修期，不能延长。

输入设备和操作 - P60 Pro有一个光学指纹传感器

该手机的电容式触摸屏配有预装的屏幕保护膜，具有高达300赫兹的采样率。这使得输入流畅而精确。即使使用了屏幕保护膜，它的滑行性能仍然很好。

P60 Pro支持各种手势和智能功能，如指关节手势、双击屏幕以唤醒它，以及单手模式。它的线性振动马达（Z轴）释放出微妙但准确的触觉反馈。

一个光学指纹传感器负责生物识别安全--它能可靠地识别指纹并快速解锁手机。此外，你还可以使用前置摄像头激活面部识别，它工作迅速，甚至可以在黑暗中使用--尽管它的安全性稍差。

显示屏 - 一个明亮的120-Hz OLED屏幕

华为P60 Pro的屏幕继续依靠LTPO OLED技术，扩大了全高清分辨率，使其具有极大的清晰度。它的刷新率由系统自动设置，范围在1至120赫兹之间。支持HDR标准HLG、HDR10和HDR10+。

与手机的前代产品相比，屏幕的亮度有了很大的提高，当屏幕为全白时，只要环境光传感器被激活，它的最大亮度为1,188cd/m²。在手动模式下，它能达到612cd/m²的比率。在光区和暗区均匀分布的情况下（APL18），这些比率几乎没有任何提高，为1,233 cd/m²。

P60 Pro的面板支持1,440赫兹的PWM调光，这应该可以大大减少敏感用户的压力。使用示波器，我们仍然能够测量到120赫兹的相对稳定的频率--尽管这可能是因为可能的屏幕烧毁保护或黑框插入。


1188 cd/m²	1182 cd/m²	1188 cd/m²
1189 cd/m²	1188 cd/m²	1192 cd/m²
1191 cd/m²	1181 cd/m²	1200 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3

Maximum: 1200 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1188.8 cd/m² Minimum: 2.13 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 1188 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.3 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 2.3 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
99.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.23

	Huawei P60 Pro OLED, 2700x1220, 6.67	Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Dynamic AMOLED 2x, 3080x1440, 6.80	Apple iPhone 14 Pro Super Retina XDR OLED, 2556x1179, 6.10	Xiaomi 13 Pro OLED, 3200x1440, 6.73	Honor Magic5 Pro OLED, 2848x1312, 6.81	Google Pixel 7 Pro OLED, 3120x1440, 6.70	Huawei P50 Pro OLED, 2700x1228, 6.60
Screen		-14%	4%	12%	-10%	17%	-0%
Brightness middle	1188	1117 -6%	1046 -12%	1230 4%	1291 9%	1022 -14%	765 -36%
Brightness	1189	1133 -5%	1049 -12%	1244 5%	1289 8%	1025 -14%	771 -35%
Brightness Distribution	98	97 -1%	98 0%	94 -4%	96 -2%	99 1%	95 -3%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.3	2.2 -69%	1.2 8%	1 23%	1.7 -31%	0.9 31%	1.2 8%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	3.7	3.9 -5%	3.1 16%	2.8 24%	4.4 -19%	2.1 43%	2.6 30%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.3	2.3 -0%	1.7 26%	1.8 22%	2.9 -26%	1.1 52%	1.5 35%
Gamma	2.23 ^99%	2.37 ^93%	2.19 ^100%	2.24 ^98%	2.28 ^96%	2.22 ^99%	2.21 ^100%
CCT	6561 ^99%	6572 ^99%	6538 ^99%	6446 ^101%	6472 ^100%	6650 ^98%	6446 ^101%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

120 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 120 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 120 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17924 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

测量系列具有固定的变焦水平和不同的亮度设置。

前期工作中，华为P60 Pro有相当自然的色彩描绘，我们用它作为测量的基础。灰色调的描绘非常准确，只有在最浅的色调中才开始出现偏差。颜色偏差非常小，甚至用肉眼都看不出来。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
1.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.558 ms rise
1.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.541 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.12 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.528 ms rise
1.12 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.594 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

尽管华为P60 Pro在屏幕亮度方面不能完全跟上Galaxy S23 Ultra或iPhone 14 Pro，但在阳光明媚的日子里保持清晰绝对还是绰绰有余。

华为手机的视角稳定性也很好--如果有的话，我们注意到在以非常平坦的角度拿着手机时，亮度略有下降，色彩描绘略微偏暖。

性能--华为智能手机配备快速的骁龙8+第一代处理器

华为P60 Pro依靠的是骁龙8+第一代4G配有8或12GB内存。与我们测试的拥有这种SoC的智能手机相比，它的纯CPU速度刚刚超过平均水平--但它显然输给了已经利用后续一代芯片组的手机。

它的UFS 3.1存储也非常快，在写小数据块时，可以与许多拥有UFS 4.0的竞争对手竞争。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144	1878 Points +42%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288	1556 Points +18%
Xiaomi 13 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288	1499 Points +13%
Honor Magic5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288	1486 Points +12%
Huawei P60 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	1321 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (897 - 1389, n=23)	1280 Points -3%
Sony Xperia 1 IV Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	1237 Points -6%
Huawei P50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G, Adreno 660, 8192	1109 Points -16%
Google Pixel 7 Pro Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288	1048 Points -21%
Average of class Smartphone (119 - 2138, n=216, last 2 years)	914 Points -31%
Multi-Core
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144	5538 Points +33%
Xiaomi 13 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288	5201 Points +25%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288	5082 Points +22%
Honor Magic5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288	4846 Points +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (3782 - 4436, n=23)	4173 Points +1%
Huawei P60 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	4149 Points
Sony Xperia 1 IV Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	3489 Points -16%
Huawei P50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G, Adreno 660, 8192	3342 Points -19%
Google Pixel 7 Pro Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288	3222 Points -22%
Average of class Smartphone (473 - 6681, n=216, last 2 years)	2997 Points -28%

Geekbench 6.0
Single-Core
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144	2531 Points +44%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288	1976 Points +12%
Honor Magic5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288	1952 Points +11%
Huawei P60 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	1759 Points
Xiaomi 13 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288	1753 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (1271 - 1785, n=4)	1650 Points -6%
Google Pixel 7 Pro Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288	1487 Points -15%
Average of class Smartphone (188 - 2531, n=44, last 2 years)	1279 Points -27%
Multi-Core
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144	6460 Points +45%
Xiaomi 13 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288	5422 Points +22%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288	5221 Points +17%
Honor Magic5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288	5208 Points +17%
Huawei P60 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	4461 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4025 - 4677, n=4)	4458 Points 0%
Google Pixel 7 Pro Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288	3862 Points -13%
Average of class Smartphone (512 - 6460, n=44, last 2 years)	3412 Points -24%

Antutu v9 - Total Score
Xiaomi 13 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288	1277795 Points +22%
Honor Magic5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288	1227867 Points +18%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288	1226224 Points +17%
Huawei P60 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	1044035 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (782013 - 1119358, n=21)	997518 Points -4%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144	965593 Points -8%
Huawei P50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G, Adreno 660, 8192	793997 Points -24%
Google Pixel 7 Pro Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288	773857 Points -26%
Average of class Smartphone (102602 - 1650926, n=153, last 2 years)	738503 Points -29%
Sony Xperia 1 IV Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	692924 Points -34%

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288	15991 Points +35%
Honor Magic5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288	15550 Points +31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (11029 - 17727, n=22)	14796 Points +25%
Xiaomi 13 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288	14789 Points +24%
Sony Xperia 1 IV Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	14267 Points +20%
Huawei P50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G, Adreno 660, 8192	13274 Points +12%
Huawei P60 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	11883 Points
Average of class Smartphone (4761 - 21385, n=212, last 2 years)	11756 Points -1%
Google Pixel 7 Pro Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288	11397 Points -4%

CrossMark - Overall
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144	1332 Points +15%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288	1226 Points +6%
Xiaomi 13 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288	1224 Points +6%
Huawei P60 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	1155 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (749 - 1178, n=21)	1033 Points -11%
Honor Magic5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288	992 Points -14%
Sony Xperia 1 IV Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	990 Points -14%
Google Pixel 7 Pro Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288	886 Points -23%
Average of class Smartphone (200 - 1474, n=164, last 2 years)	835 Points -28%
Huawei P50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G, Adreno 660, 8192	Points -100%

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Honor Magic5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288	9585 Points +18%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288	9091 Points +12%
Huawei P60 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	8144 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (5642 - 8753, n=21)	7507 Points -8%
Xiaomi 13 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288	7376 Points -9%
Sony Xperia 1 IV Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	7277 Points -11%
Huawei P50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G, Adreno 660, 8192	6550 Points -20%
Google Pixel 7 Pro Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288	6164 Points -24%
Average of class Smartphone (411 - 11438, n=165, last 2 years)	5745 Points -29%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144	Points -100%
System
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288	14275 Points +14%
Honor Magic5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288	13642 Points +9%
Huawei P60 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	12488 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (8750 - 13563, n=21)	11842 Points -5%
Sony Xperia 1 IV Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	11338 Points -9%
Xiaomi 13 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288	10786 Points -14%
Huawei P50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G, Adreno 660, 8192	10727 Points -14%
Average of class Smartphone (2376 - 16475, n=165, last 2 years)	9678 Points -23%
Google Pixel 7 Pro Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288	9294 Points -26%
Memory
Honor Magic5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288	10467 Points +15%
Huawei P60 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	9114 Points
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288	9075 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (3871 - 9114, n=21)	7549 Points -17%
Sony Xperia 1 IV Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	7293 Points -20%
Xiaomi 13 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288	7232 Points -21%
Huawei P50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G, Adreno 660, 8192	7081 Points -22%
Average of class Smartphone (670 - 12716, n=165, last 2 years)	6250 Points -31%
Google Pixel 7 Pro Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288	5456 Points -40%
Graphics
Honor Magic5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288	29649 Points +26%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288	28497 Points +21%
Huawei P60 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	23546 Points
Xiaomi 13 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288	22986 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (16742 - 26660, n=21)	21295 Points -10%
Sony Xperia 1 IV Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	20093 Points -15%
Google Pixel 7 Pro Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288	16375 Points -30%
Huawei P50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G, Adreno 660, 8192	15464 Points -34%
Average of class Smartphone (697 - 58651, n=165, last 2 years)	14101 Points -40%
Web
Honor Magic5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288	1994 Points +21%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288	1850 Points +12%
Google Pixel 7 Pro Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288	1739 Points +6%
Sony Xperia 1 IV Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	1728 Points +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (1198 - 2006, n=21)	1713 Points +4%
Xiaomi 13 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288	1665 Points +1%
Huawei P60 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	1648 Points
Huawei P50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G, Adreno 660, 8192	1567 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 2145, n=165, last 2 years)	1494 Points -9%

UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Sony Xperia 1 IV Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	81722 Points +503%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (3291 - 84787, n=19)	47040 Points +247%
Google Pixel 7 Pro Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288	42662 Points +215%
Average of class Smartphone (207 - 84787, n=149, last 2 years)	21860 Points +61%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288	16511 Points +22%
Xiaomi 13 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288	15778 Points +16%
Huawei P60 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	13548 Points
Honor Magic5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288	11338 Points -16%

AImark - Score v3.x
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144	37396 Points +407%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (887 - 128240, n=9)	29608 Points +302%
Average of class Smartphone (298 - 245629, n=105, last 2 years)	17833 Points +142%
Huawei P60 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	7374 Points
Xiaomi 13 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288	1354 Points -82%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288	1312 Points -82%
Honor Magic5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288	1266 Points -83%
Google Pixel 7 Pro Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288	1008 Points -86%

这款手机的集成阿德雷诺730在图形基准测试中给人留下了深刻的印象--然而，它的许多竞争对手的表现都超过了这个设备，因为他们已经使用了较新的Adreno 740.

在一天结束的时候，这款手机仍然有足够的能力来运行要求更高的游戏和应对其他复杂的图形计算。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Wild Life Score | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3791 Points +38%
Xiaomi 13 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3784 Points +37%
Honor Magic5 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3595 Points +30%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe	3265 Points +19%
Huawei P60 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2755 Points
Google Pixel 7 Pro Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1807 Points -34%
Huawei P50 Pro Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1463 Points -47%

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Xiaomi 13 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3843 Points +38%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3829 Points +37%
Honor Magic5 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3687 Points +32%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe	3383 Points +21%
Huawei P60 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2791 Points
Google Pixel 7 Pro Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1847 Points -34%
Huawei P50 Pro Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1555 Points -44%

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	14369 Points +30%
Xiaomi 13 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	13984 Points +27%
Honor Magic5 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	13827 Points +26%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe	12429 Points +13%
Huawei P60 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	11012 Points
Google Pixel 7 Pro Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6721 Points -39%
Huawei P50 Pro Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	5915 Points -46%

3DMark / Wild Life Score
Google Pixel 7 Pro Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6534 Points
Huawei P50 Pro Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	5758 Points
Honor Magic5 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	Points

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6293 Points +9%
Honor Magic5 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6231 Points +8%
Huawei P60 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	5780 Points
Huawei P50 Pro Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	5156 Points -11%
Google Pixel 7 Pro Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4672 Points -19%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Honor Magic5 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	24707 Points +22%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	23070 Points +14%
Huawei P60 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	20294 Points
Huawei P50 Pro Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	12120 Points -40%
Google Pixel 7 Pro Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	10987 Points -46%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Honor Magic5 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	14893 Points +14%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	14487 Points +11%
Huawei P60 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	13026 Points
Huawei P50 Pro Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	9322 Points -28%
Google Pixel 7 Pro Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	8449 Points -35%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Huawei P50 Pro Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	121 fps +102%
Google Pixel 7 Pro Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	120 fps +100%
Xiaomi 13 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +100%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +100%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe	60 fps 0%
Honor Magic5 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps 0%
Huawei P60 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi 13 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	497 fps +9%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	492 fps +8%
Honor Magic5 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	472 fps +3%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe	462 fps +1%
Huawei P60 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	457 fps
Huawei P50 Pro Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	281 fps -39%
Google Pixel 7 Pro Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	251 fps -45%

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi 13 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +100%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	119 fps +98%
Huawei P50 Pro Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	106 fps +77%
Google Pixel 7 Pro Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	84 fps +40%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe	60 fps 0%
Honor Magic5 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps 0%
Huawei P60 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi 13 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	331 fps +38%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe	292 fps +22%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	261 fps +9%
Honor Magic5 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	260 fps +9%
Huawei P60 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	239 fps
Google Pixel 7 Pro Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	139 fps -42%
Huawei P50 Pro Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	132 fps -45%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi 13 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	109 fps +82%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	91 fps +52%
Huawei P50 Pro Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	67 fps +12%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe	60 fps 0%
Honor Magic5 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps 0%
Huawei P60 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps
Google Pixel 7 Pro Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	56 fps -7%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi 13 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	222 fps +22%
Honor Magic5 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	206 fps +13%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe	197 fps +8%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	190 fps +4%
Huawei P60 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	182 fps
Google Pixel 7 Pro Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	101 fps -45%
Huawei P50 Pro Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	52 fps -71%

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	65 fps +8%
Xiaomi 13 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	63 fps +5%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe	60 fps 0%
Honor Magic5 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps 0%
Huawei P60 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps
Google Pixel 7 Pro Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	37 fps -38%
Huawei P50 Pro Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	20 fps -67%

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Xiaomi 13 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	126 fps +22%
Honor Magic5 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	125 fps +21%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	123 fps +19%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe	114 fps +11%
Huawei P60 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	103 fps
Google Pixel 7 Pro Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	68 fps -34%
Huawei P50 Pro Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	59 fps -43%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps +15%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe	59 fps +13%
Honor Magic5 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	59 fps +13%
Huawei P60 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	52 fps
Xiaomi 13 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	51 fps -2%
Huawei P50 Pro Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	31 fps -40%
Google Pixel 7 Pro Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	28 fps -46%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Honor Magic5 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	68 fps +36%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	67 fps +34%
Xiaomi 13 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	61 fps +22%
Huawei P60 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	50 fps
Apple iPhone 14 Pro A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe	44 fps -12%
Google Pixel 7 Pro Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	31 fps -38%
Huawei P50 Pro Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	25 fps -50%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	84 fps +40%
Xiaomi 13 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	82 fps +37%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe	60 fps 0%
Honor Magic5 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps 0%
Huawei P60 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps
Huawei P50 Pro Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	44 fps -27%
Google Pixel 7 Pro Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	38 fps -37%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi 13 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	157 fps +23%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	157 fps +23%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe	133 fps +4%
Huawei P60 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	128 fps
Honor Magic5 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	123 fps -4%
Google Pixel 7 Pro Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	75 fps -41%
Huawei P50 Pro Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	69 fps -46%

GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	31 fps +35%
Honor Magic5 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	30 fps +30%
Xiaomi 13 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	28 fps +22%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe	23 fps 0%
Huawei P60 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	23 fps
Google Pixel 7 Pro Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	14 fps -39%

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 14 Pro (Safari 16)	281.762 Points +170%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (Chrome 109)	159.102 Points +52%
Xiaomi 13 Pro (Chrome 109)	137.873 Points +32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (76.2 - 178.5, n=21)	121.1 Points +16%
Honor Magic5 Pro (Chrome 111)	116.696 Points +12%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 351, n=172, last 2 years)	105.8 Points +1%
Huawei P60 Pro (Huawei Browser 13.0.4)	104.372 Points
Google Pixel 7 Pro (Chrome 106)	98.153 Points -6%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPhone 14 Pro (Safari 16)	375 runs/min +268%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (Chrome 109)	143 runs/min +40%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (69.1 - 167, n=16)	111.4 runs/min +9%
Honor Magic5 Pro (Chrome 111)	111 runs/min +9%
Xiaomi 13 Pro (Chrome 109)	110.9 runs/min +9%
Average of class Smartphone (14.9 - 445, n=157, last 2 years)	107.1 runs/min +5%
Google Pixel 7 Pro (Chrome 106)	104 runs/min +2%
Huawei P60 Pro (Huawei Browser 13.0.4)	102 runs/min

WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Apple iPhone 14 Pro (Safari 16)	202 Points +108%
Xiaomi 13 Pro (Chrome 109)	157 Points +62%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (Chrome 110)	145 Points +49%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (69 - 159, n=19)	111 Points +14%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 202, n=159, last 2 years)	99.9 Points +3%
Honor Magic5 Pro (Chrome 111)	98 Points +1%
Huawei P60 Pro (Huawei Browser 13.0.4)	97 Points
Google Pixel 7 Pro (Chrome 106)	90 Points -7%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Apple iPhone 14 Pro (Safari 16)	292 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (106 - 224, n=14)	159.4 Points
Average of class Smartphone (39 - 304, n=122, last 2 years)	133.1 Points
Huawei P50 Pro (Huawei Browser 12)	115 Points
Google Pixel 7 Pro (Chrome 106)	98 Points

Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 14 Pro (Safari 16)	74261 Points +45%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (Chrome 109)	59214 Points +16%
Huawei P60 Pro (Huawei Browser 13.0.4)	51115 Points
Google Pixel 7 Pro (Chrome 106)	44245 Points -13%
Xiaomi 13 Pro (Chrome 109)	42544 Points -17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (17622 - 55611, n=22)	41373 Points -19%
Honor Magic5 Pro (Chrome 111)	39825 Points -22%
Average of class Smartphone (4633 - 89112, n=210, last 2 years)	33573 Points -34%
Huawei P50 Pro (Huawei Browser 12)	22851 Points -55%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Huawei P50 Pro (Huawei Browser 12)	1835 ms * -109%
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=172, last 2 years)	1599 ms * -82%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (729 - 1707, n=20)	1047 ms * -19%
Google Pixel 7 Pro (Chrome 106)	1011.5 ms * -15%
Honor Magic5 Pro (Chrome 111)	981.4 ms * -12%
Huawei P60 Pro (Huawei Browser 13.0.4)	876.7 ms *
Xiaomi 13 Pro (Chrome 109)	690.6 ms * +21%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (Chrome 109)	685 ms * +22%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro (Safari 16)	475.3 ms * +46%

* ... smaller is better

	Huawei P60 Pro	Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra	Xiaomi 13 Pro	Honor Magic5 Pro	Google Pixel 7 Pro	Huawei P50 Pro	Average 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		11%	48%	23%	-38%	-26%	-20%	-29%
Sequential Read 256KB	2012.83	3426.56 70%	3587.83 78%	3344.12 66%	1346.78 -33%	1836 -9%	1760 ?(1004 - 2037, n=87) -13%	1505 ?(226 - 4512, n=215, last 2 years) -25%
Sequential Write 256KB	1519.82	1389.84 -9%	2601.45 71%	2651.87 74%	874.73 -42%	755 -50%	1134 ?(452 - 1873, n=87) -25%	1112 ?(57.5 - 3678, n=215, last 2 years) -27%
Random Read 4KB	296.39	449.77 52%	387.72 31%	267.91 -10%	219.01 -26%	269.3 -9%	281 ?(173.5 - 543, n=87) -5%	247 ?(22.2 - 543, n=215, last 2 years) -17%
Random Write 4KB	496.39	152.92 -69%	546.98 10%	298.31 -40%	253.18 -49%	329.6 -34%	311 ?(197.5 - 499, n=88) -37%	271 ?(13 - 709, n=215, last 2 years) -45%

排放--弱的SoC冷却

温度

在空闲模式下，P60 Pro的表面温度保持相对较低，但在负载情况下，整个手机表面的温度迅速超过了40°C大关。不过，应该注意的是，我们使用Burnout基准测试对P60进行测量--它比我们在其他智能手机上使用的稳定性测试要求更高。

然而，在3DMark压力测试中，P60 Pro显示出薄弱的冷却性能，难以控制高通芯片组。我们多次看到性能损失高达64%。

Max. Load

Idle


46.6 °C	44.2 °C	41.3 °C
47.1 °C	47.6 °C	41.3 °C
47.2 °C	44.9 °C	40.2 °C

Maximum: 47.6 °C
Average: 44.5 °C


38.3 °C	41.1 °C	42 °C
38.1 °C	41.7 °C	44.4 °C
38.2 °C	40.4 °C	44.5 °C

Maximum: 44.5 °C
Average: 41 °C

Power Supply (max.) 31.6 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 44.5 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47.6 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.5 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.4 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi 13 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	83.1 % +131%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe	82 % +128%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	69 % +92%
Google Pixel 7 Pro Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	67.9 % +89%
Huawei P50 Pro Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	53.3 % +48%
Honor Magic5 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	40.8 % +13%
Huawei P60 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	36 %
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Xiaomi 13 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	88.2 % +162%
Google Pixel 7 Pro Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	75.6 % +124%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe	68 % +102%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	58.7 % +74%
Huawei P50 Pro Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	58.2 % +73%
Honor Magic5 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	46.9 % +39%
Huawei P60 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	33.7 %

Huawei P60 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø12.6 (5.68-16.9)

Google Pixel 7 Pro Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø9.93 (8.31-11)

Huawei P60 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø40 (23.3-64.9)

Google Pixel 7 Pro Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø32.8 (26.2-38.6)

Google Pixel 7 Pro Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø36.5 (30.7-39.8)

发言人

华为手机的两个扬声器创造了相当令人愉快的声音--只要它们不被设置得太响。在这里，高音有点过于极端，声音变得有点空洞。

蓝牙音频编解码器不包括那些来自高通的编解码器。想利用高清晰流媒体的用户不得不求助于使用LDAC或华为自己的L2HC编解码器。然而，后者仅由耳机工作室.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Huawei P60 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 21% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Google Pixel 7 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 24% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命--华为P60 Pro配备4,815 mAh电池

消耗功率

华为P60 Pro的功耗在最低显示亮度和空闲模式下略有提升--在最大手动亮度下，实际上是大大提升的。后者至少可以用相对较高的亮度水平来解释。使用适应性显示亮度的测量结果显示，该手机更加节俭。

P60 Pro可以使用电缆充电，功率高达88瓦，无线充电的功率高达50瓦。这款华为智能手机还支持反向无线充电。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.09 / 0.17 Watt
Idle	1.06 / 2.43 / 2.44 Watt
Load	3.65 / 7.74 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Huawei P60 Pro 4815 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra 5000 mAh	Apple iPhone 14 Pro 3200 mAh	Xiaomi 13 Pro 4820 mAh	Honor Magic5 Pro 5100 mAh	Google Pixel 7 Pro 5000 mAh	Huawei P50 Pro 4360 mAh	Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		23%	33%	17%	30%	25%	-8%	-4%	6%
Idle Minimum *	1.06	0.9 15%	0.56 47%	1.02 4%	0.91 14%	0.78 26%	1.24 -17%	1.015 ?(0.56 - 2.57, n=19) 4%	0.897 ?(0.42 - 2.37, n=162, last 2 years) 15%
Idle Average *	2.43	1.05 57%	1.37 44%	1.36 44%	1.63 33%	1.61 34%	2.14 12%	1.869 ?(0.71 - 8.65, n=19) 23%	1.452 ?(0.69 - 4.26, n=162, last 2 years) 40%
Idle Maximum *	2.44	1.1 55%	1.42 42%	1.58 35%	1.67 32%	1.63 33%	2.2 10%	2.02 ?(0.79 - 8.71, n=19) 17%	1.629 ?(0.79 - 4.45, n=162, last 2 years) 33%
Load Average *	3.65	3.99 -9%	3.42 6%	4.29 -18%	2.61 28%	3.29 10%	3.95 -8%	5.69 ?(2.75 - 15, n=19) -56%	5.55 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=162, last 2 years) -52%
Load Maximum *	7.74	7.82 -1%	5.56 28%	6.15 21%	4.57 41%	6.01 22%	10.45 -35%	8.55 ?(4.54 - 15, n=19) -10%	8.31 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=162, last 2 years) -7%

* ... smaller is better

power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Huawei P60 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø5.52 (0.967-11.2)

Sony Xperia 1 IV Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø6.98 (1.297-12.1)

Huawei P60 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.116 (1.044-1.357)

Sony Xperia 1 IV Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.51 (1.406-1.71)

power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

Huawei P60 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø9.99 (9.16-10.3)

Sony Xperia 1 IV Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø9.42 (6.85-11.9)

Huawei P60 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.116 (1.044-1.357)

Sony Xperia 1 IV Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.51 (1.406-1.71)

运行时间

这款手机的电池容量为4,815毫安时，比其前代产品大10.4％。P50 Pro(4,360 mAh)。当你看一下P60 Pro的运行时间时，这就变得非常明显了--它们要好34%，在我们的WLAN测试中，这款手机在适应显示亮度（150cd/m²）的情况下，运行时间超过13小时。相比之下，这并没有创造任何新的记录，但它仍然是一个非常好的结果。

Battery Runtime


WiFi Websurfing (Huawei Browser 13.0.4)		13h 12min

Battery Runtime - WiFi v1.3
Huawei P60 Pro 4815 mAh	792 min
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra 5000 mAh	1100 min
Apple iPhone 14 Pro 3200 mAh	807 min
Xiaomi 13 Pro 4820 mAh	846 min
Honor Magic5 Pro 5100 mAh	1074 min
Google Pixel 7 Pro 5000 mAh	676 min
Huawei P50 Pro 4360 mAh	590 min

Pros

+ 明亮的LTPO显示屏

+ 快速的系统性能

+ 良好的电池运行时间

+ 四频GNSS

+ IP68

+ 快速充电，无线充电选项

Cons

- 没有5G和6GHz无线局域网

- 没有谷歌服务

- 不确定的更新交付

- 缺少蓝牙编解码器

- 负载下强烈的节流现象

结论 - 一个强大的智能手机，有一些挥之不去的不足之处

华为P60 Pro被评测。测试设备由华为德国公司提供。(图片: Daniel Schmidt) — 华为P60 Pro被评测。测试设备由德国华为提供。

虽然华为P60 Pro在技术上是一款非常好的智能手机，但由于它的制裁，它仍然继续与旧的和越来越多的问题作斗争。从积极的方面来看，它有一个现代的LTPO显示屏，运行频率高达120赫兹，非常明亮，并且具有良好的色彩准确性。你还可以使用电缆或通过使用其无线充电功能为智能手机快速充电。它还通过了IP68防尘和防水认证。此外，P60 Pro是第一款支持GNSS频率E5b和B2b的智能手机。一个令人敬畏的三摄像头完成了该手机的设置。

华为P60 Pro在很多方面都令人印象深刻--但它错过了一些现代无线电标准以及谷歌服务。

除了缺少谷歌服务和5G之外，这款手机实际上没有更多的最新信息。华为可能已经采用了高端SoC--但它是去年的型号，不支持6-GHz的WLAN频段。显示屏具有1,440赫兹的PWM调光功能，但魔法5 Pro有2,160赫兹可提供。其屏幕亮度也不足以让P60 Pro拔得头筹。

从技术上看，华为仍然制造了一款非常好的智能手机。不幸的是，由于其缺少谷歌服务，我们不能完全推荐购买该设备。华为可能会提供利用第三方服务的替代品和解决方案--但这对很多用户来说会被证明有点太复杂了。然而，如果这对你来说不是一个太大的问题，而且你不需要谷歌支付或Android Auto，那么P60 Pro很可能被证明是一个适合替代Pixel 7 Pro,Galaxy S23 Ultra和类似的手机。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

价格和可用性

配备8GB内存和256GB存储的华为P60 Pro版本可以在亚马逊上以1179美元的价格购买。配备12GB内存和512GB存储的版本可以以1299美元的价格找到。

Huawei P60 Pro - 2023-05-30 05/30/2023 v7
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis

93%

Keyboard

67 / 75 → 89%

Pointing Device

92%

Connectivity

70 / 70 → 100%

Weight

88%

Battery

90%

Display

93%

Games Performance

59 / 64 → 93%

Application Performance

92 / 86 → 100%

Temperature

84%

Noise

100%

Audio

75 / 90 → 84%

Camera

80%

Average

83%

89%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Daisy Dickson - Translator - 208 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2023

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 387730 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 华为P60 Pro评测--即使没有徕卡也是一款强大的相机智能手机

Daniel Schmidt, 2023-06- 2 (Update: 2023-06- 2)

华为P60 Pro评测--即使没有徕卡也是一款强大的相机智能手机

潜在的竞争对手比较

表壳 - 光滑的背面和昆仑玻璃

尺寸比较

连接性 - USB 3.2和一个快速的microSD读卡器

微型SD卡读卡器

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

软件--P60 Pro继续错过谷歌服务

通信和GNSS - 没有5G的华为智能手机

电话功能和通话质量

摄像机--P60 Pro少了一个镜头

附件和保修 - 包括一个快速充电适配器

输入设备和操作 - P60 Pro有一个光学指纹传感器

显示屏 - 一个明亮的120-Hz OLED屏幕

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

性能--华为智能手机配备快速的骁龙8+第一代处理器

排放--弱的SoC冷却

温度

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

发言人

Huawei P60 Pro audio analysis

Google Pixel 7 Pro audio analysis

电池寿命--华为P60 Pro配备4,815 mAh电池

消耗功率

power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

运行时间

Pros

Cons

结论 - 一个强大的智能手机，有一些挥之不去的不足之处

价格和可用性

More articles related to this device

Transparency

Pricecompare