Apple Mac Studio 2023 评测:M2 Max 也是令人印象深刻的桌面设备
案例 - 知名铝材
Mac Studio 的设计没有任何变化,这意味着你将继续获得一台相对紧凑的台式电脑,并配备高品质的铝合金外壳。四角采用圆角设计,小巧的立方体相当沉重,重量接近 2.8 千克(M2 Ultra 甚至重达 3.6 千克),因此给人一种高品质的感觉。其占地面积与Mac Mini但 Mac Studio 当然要高得多。这台电脑可以放在办公桌上大多数显示器的下方。电源已集成到设备中,电源线又长又漂亮,长度超过 180 厘米。
正如预期的那样,它的构造非常出色,这个小巧的立方体也非常稳定。Mac 依然没有维护选项,这在台式电脑上是一个巨大的缺点。基本型号的 32 GB 内存还算可以,但其内部固态硬盘容量只能在购买后通过外置硬盘进行扩展。
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
连接性 - Thunderbolt 4 和 Wi-Fi 6E
Mac Studio 提供一系列连接选项,包括四个配备 Thunderbolt 4 的现代 USB-C 端口。根据所选配置,正面的两个 USB-C 端口均支持 USB 3.2 Gen.2 (M2 Max) 或 USB 4.0/Thunderbolt 4 (M2 Ultra)。正面的连接选项消除了我们对 Mac Mini 的诟病,因为你现在可以快速、轻松地连接配件。配备 M2 Max 的 Mac Studio 最多可支持五台外接显示器;配备 M2 Ultra 的机型甚至可支持多达八台显示器。
SD 读卡器
正面的 SD 读卡器几乎可以完全读取 SD 卡,在我们使用参考卡(Angelbird AV Pro V60)进行的测试中,可以达到很好的传输速率,与当前的平均传输速率差不多。MacBook Pro 16 M2 Max.我们测得的峰值速度超过 200 MB/s。
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Apple Mac Studio 2023 M2 Max (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Apple Mac Studio 2022 M1 Max (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Average of class Desktop (19.9 - 187, n=6, last 2 years) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Apple Mac Studio 2023 M2 Max (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Average of class Desktop (20.6 - 215, n=5, last 2 years) |
交流
Apple Mac Studio 配备了标准的 10 Gbit/s 以太网连接。此外,电脑还使用了当前 MacBook Pro 16 的 WLAN 模块。MacBook Pro 16的 WLAN 模块,该模块除了支持现代 WiFi 6E 标准外,还支持蓝牙 5.3。结合华硕的参考路由器,我们测得了很高且稳定的传输速率。在测试中,我们也从未遇到过任何无线连接问题。
Networking | |
Apple Mac Studio 2023 M2 Max | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz |
|
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz |
|
Apple Mac Studio 2022 M1 Max | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
Apple Mac Mini M2 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz |
|
性能 - 配备 30 个 GPU 内核的Apple M2 Max
处理器
处理器部分M2 Max的处理器部分与较小的M2 Pro- 只是其更大的缓存在某些用途上略有优势。它共有 12 个 CPU 内核,分为三个集群。高效核心集群由四个核心组成,最高主频可达 2.4 GHz,两个高性能集群各有四个核心,最高主频可达 3.7 GHz。与其他Apple 产品类似,它的最大 TDP 为 36 瓦,我们测得的结果与 MacBook Pro 16 M2 Max 相同。MacBook Pro 16 M2 Max和MacBook Pro 14 M2 Pro.我们的 Cinebench R15 多循环测试表明,它的性能完全保持稳定。与旧版Mac Studio 与 M1 Max相比,它的优势为 8%(单核)和 20%(多核),这除了得益于更高的时钟频率外,还得益于两个额外的 E 核。
Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test
AMD 和英特尔的竞争产品在总体上提供了更好的 CPU 性能,但功耗也更高一些。我们谈论的是移动处理器,它们也用于迷你 PC。当然,真正的台式电脑性能完全不同,但它们的 TDP 值也更高。
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
CPU Performance Rating | |
Beelink SER7 | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit | |
Average of class Desktop | |
Apple Mac Studio 2023 M2 Max | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max | |
Average Apple M2 Max | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro | |
Apple Mac Studio 2022 M1 Max | |
Apple Mac Mini M2 |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Beelink SER7 | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max | |
Average Apple M2 Max (14738 - 14767, n=2) | |
Apple Mac Studio 2023 M2 Max | |
Average of class Desktop (277 - 38314, n=29, last 2 years) | |
Apple Mac Studio 2022 M1 Max | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit | |
Apple Mac Mini M2 |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit | |
Beelink SER7 | |
Apple Mac Studio 2023 M2 Max | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro | |
Average Apple M2 Max (1625 - 1662, n=2) | |
Apple Mac Mini M2 | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max | |
Apple Mac Studio 2022 M1 Max | |
Average of class Desktop (439 - 2210, n=27, last 2 years) |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Beelink SER7 | |
Average of class Desktop (285 - 14891, n=27, last 2 years) | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit | |
Apple Mac Studio 2023 M2 Max | |
Average Apple M2 Max (4044 - 4085, n=2) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max | |
Apple Mac Studio 2022 M1 Max | |
Apple Mac Mini M2 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit | |
Beelink SER7 | |
Average of class Desktop (174 - 853, n=27, last 2 years) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max | |
Average Apple M2 Max (451 - 460, n=2) | |
Apple Mac Studio 2023 M2 Max | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro | |
Apple Mac Mini M2 | |
Apple Mac Studio 2022 M1 Max |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Average of class Desktop (128 - 6236, n=31, last 2 years) | |
Beelink SER7 | |
Apple Mac Studio 2023 M2 Max | |
Average Apple M2 Max (2074 - 2094, n=2) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit | |
Apple Mac Studio 2022 M1 Max | |
Apple Mac Mini M2 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Beelink SER7 | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max | |
Average of class Desktop (76 - 319, n=31, last 2 years) | |
Average Apple M2 Max (233 - 239, n=2) | |
Apple Mac Studio 2023 M2 Max | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro | |
Apple Mac Mini M2 | |
Apple Mac Studio 2022 M1 Max |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Apple Mac Studio 2023 M2 Max | |
Average Apple M2 Max (15348 - 15444, n=3) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro | |
Apple Mac Studio 2022 M1 Max | |
Beelink SER7 | |
Average of class Desktop (844 - 24033, n=26, last 2 years) | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit | |
Apple Mac Mini M2 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Beelink SER7 | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max | |
Average Apple M2 Max (1965 - 1978, n=3) | |
Apple Mac Studio 2023 M2 Max | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro | |
Apple Mac Mini M2 | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit | |
Apple Mac Studio 2022 M1 Max | |
Average of class Desktop (556 - 2241, n=26, last 2 years) |
系统性能
Mac 的系统性能在日常使用中表现出色,输入立即执行。即使是复杂的程序,如 DaVinci Resolve 或 Adobe Photoshop(针对 ARM 芯片进行了优化),在当前的Apple 产品上也能运行得非常快速流畅。英特尔 Mac 的旧版应用程序可以通过 Rosetta 2 进行仿真,同样运行良好。与运行原生应用程序相比,其性能稍逊一筹。
Jetstream 2: Total Score
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Speedometer 2.0: Result
Blackmagic RAW Speed Test: 12:1 8K Metal | 12:1 8K CPU
CrossMark / Overall | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro | |
Apple Mac Studio 2023 M2 Max | |
Average Apple M2 Max, Apple M2 Max 30-Core GPU () | |
Average of class Desktop (481 - 2495, n=21, last 2 years) | |
Apple Mac Studio 2022 M1 Max | |
Apple Mac Mini M2 |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Average of class Desktop (518 - 2292, n=21, last 2 years) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro | |
Apple Mac Studio 2023 M2 Max | |
Average Apple M2 Max, Apple M2 Max 30-Core GPU () | |
Apple Mac Mini M2 | |
Apple Mac Studio 2022 M1 Max |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro | |
Apple Mac Studio 2023 M2 Max | |
Average Apple M2 Max, Apple M2 Max 30-Core GPU () | |
Apple Mac Studio 2022 M1 Max | |
Average of class Desktop (434 - 2793, n=21, last 2 years) | |
Apple Mac Mini M2 |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Average of class Desktop (469 - 2297, n=21, last 2 years) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro | |
Apple Mac Studio 2023 M2 Max | |
Average Apple M2 Max, Apple M2 Max 30-Core GPU () | |
Apple Mac Mini M2 | |
Apple Mac Studio 2022 M1 Max |
Jetstream 2 / Total Score | |
Average Apple M2 Max, Apple M2 Max 30-Core GPU () | |
Apple Mac Studio 2023 M2 Max | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro | |
Apple Mac Mini M2 | |
Apple Mac Studio 2022 M1 Max | |
Average of class Desktop (102.1 - 295, n=4, last 2 years) |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max | |
Apple Mac Studio 2023 M2 Max | |
Average Apple M2 Max, Apple M2 Max 30-Core GPU () | |
Apple Mac Mini M2 | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro | |
Apple Mac Studio 2022 M1 Max | |
Average of class Desktop (89.2 - 402, n=27, last 2 years) |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
Apple Mac Studio 2023 M2 Max | |
Average Apple M2 Max, Apple M2 Max 30-Core GPU () | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max | |
Apple Mac Mini M2 | |
Average of class Desktop (63.2 - 335, n=13, last 2 years) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro |
Speedometer 2.0 / Result | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max | |
Apple Mac Mini M2 | |
Apple Mac Studio 2023 M2 Max | |
Average Apple M2 Max, Apple M2 Max 30-Core GPU () | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro | |
Average of class Desktop (349 - 422, n=2, last 2 years) | |
Apple Mac Studio 2022 M1 Max |
Blackmagic RAW Speed Test / 12:1 8K Metal | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max | |
Apple Mac Studio 2023 M2 Max | |
Average Apple M2 Max, Apple M2 Max 30-Core GPU () | |
Average of class Desktop (200 - 215, n=2, last 2 years) | |
Apple Mac Studio 2022 M1 Max | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro | |
Apple Mac Mini M2 |
Blackmagic RAW Speed Test / 12:1 8K CPU | |
Apple Mac Studio 2023 M2 Max | |
Average Apple M2 Max, Apple M2 Max 30-Core GPU () | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max | |
Average of class Desktop (30 - 46, n=2, last 2 years) | |
Apple Mac Studio 2022 M1 Max | |
Apple Mac Mini M2 |
存储设备
固态硬盘是我们基本配置的弱点之一,因为尽管入门价格不菲,Apple ,Mac Studio 却只配备了 512GB 的固态硬盘。除了容量有限外,该硬盘的传输速率也不高,仅为 3-3.5 GB/s,只能达到 PCIe 3.0 标准的上限。只有 1 TB 以上的大容量固态硬盘才能正常使用 PCIe 4.0 连接。更多固态硬盘基准测试这里。
图形卡
Mac Studio 的基本型号使用M2 Max SoC虽然 30 核 GPU 性能较弱,但与旧版的 24 核 M1 Max GPU 相比,性能仍有可观的提升。M1 Max 24 核 GPU 相比,性能仍有相当大的提升。在合成测试中,新的 30 核 GPU 只比旧的 24 核机型高出约 30%,与旧的 32 核机型相差无几。 旧的 32 核版本相当。可选的38 核版本仍快约 20%。
我们不得不继续依靠模拟游戏来进行游戏基准测试,因为它们提供了一个综合基准。对于原生游戏,如《生化危机村》(该游戏在 1080p 下以最大细节完全流畅运行),我们仍然没有办法记录 FPS 数值来进行评估。模拟游戏的结果可以让我们对两台 Mac 进行比较,但并不能代表电脑运行本机游戏时的全部性能。在游戏基准测试中,30 核版的 M2 Max 比旧版 M1 Max 的 32 核 GPU 性能更好,而且更接近目前配备 36 个 GPU 内核的顶级机型。
Blender / v3.3 Classroom METAL | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro | |
Apple Mac Studio 2023 M2 Max | |
Average Apple M2 Max 30-Core GPU () | |
Average of class Desktop (last 2 years) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max |
Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
Average of class Desktop (128 - 2940, n=16, last 2 years) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max | |
Apple Mac Studio 2023 M2 Max | |
Average Apple M2 Max 30-Core GPU () |
* ... smaller is better
low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 115 | 102 | 69 | ||
Total War: Three Kingdoms (2019) | 91 | 65 | 41.4 | ||
Borderlands 3 (2019) | 53.2 | 45.2 | 35.1 |
排放 - Mac Studio 几乎总是保持沉默
噪音排放
Mac Studio 使用两个风扇将热空气送出机箱。这些风扇的声音几乎听不到,因为即使在 CPU/GPU 满载的情况下,我们也只能测得安静的呼呼声(25 dB(A)),略高于环境噪音水平。只有在极其安静的房间里才能听到这种呼呼声。在以最高细节运行《生化危机村》时,我们实际上只测到了 24 dB(A),而且在导出 YouTube 评测视频时,Mac Studio 仍然保持安静。我们没有注意到任何其他电气噪音。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 23.1 / 23.1 / 23.1 dB(A) |
DVD |
| 0 / dB(A) |
Load |
| 23.1 / 25 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23.1 dB(A) |
Apple Mac Studio 2023 M2 Max M2 Max 30-Core GPU, M2 Max, Apple SSD AP0512Z | Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max M2 Max 38-Core GPU, M2 Max, Apple SSD AP2048Z | Apple Mac Studio 2022 M1 Max M1 Max 32-Core GPU, M1 Max, Apple SSD AP2048R | Apple Mac Mini M2 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP0512Z | Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro M2 Pro 19-Core GPU, M2 Pro, Apple SSD AP2048Z | Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ | Beelink SER7 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -24% | -20% | -9% | -16% | -38% | -28% | |
off / environment * | 23.1 | 23.9 -3% | 23.8 -3% | 24.7 -7% | 23.9 -3% | 25.2 -9% | 24.5 -6% |
Idle Minimum * | 23.1 | 23.9 -3% | 28.8 -25% | 24.7 -7% | 23.9 -3% | 28.1 -22% | 25.1 -9% |
Idle Average * | 23.1 | 23.9 -3% | 28.8 -25% | 24.7 -7% | 23.9 -3% | 28.2 -22% | 25.1 -9% |
Idle Maximum * | 23.1 | 23.9 -3% | 28.8 -25% | 24.7 -7% | 23.9 -3% | 28.3 -23% | 25.1 -9% |
Load Average * | 23.1 | 36.6 -58% | 28.8 -25% | 24.7 -7% | 26 -13% | 42 -82% | 35.9 -55% |
Load Maximum * | 25 | 43.2 -73% | 28.8 -15% | 29.4 -18% | 43.2 -73% | 42.1 -68% | 45.4 -82% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 35.1 | 28.8 | 35.6 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
当然,与笔记本电脑相比,台式电脑的表面温度并不太重要,但即便如此,Mac Studio 也无需担心。在日常使用中,机箱温度几乎保持不变,即使在一小时的压力测试后,我们测得机箱顶部最高温度为 38 °C,风扇出口处最高温度为 42 °C。这些温度完全没有问题。
发言人
与Mac Mini,Apple 在 Mac Studio 中安装了一个扬声器,听起来还不错。如果你对音效的要求不高,那么这个扬声器就完全够用了--不过,与优秀的笔记本电脑音响系统相比,Mac Studio 并不占优势。我们始终建议你连接外置扬声器。
Apple Mac Studio 2023 M2 Max audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 50% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 46%
Compared to all devices tested
» 18% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电源管理 - 待机功耗高
耗电量
在我们的耗电量测量中,全新 Mac Studio 在空闲模式下变得更加节俭,但其 1.5 瓦的待机耗电量还是有点高。即使在关机状态下,电脑的耗电量仍为 0.63 瓦。在负载情况下,游戏时的耗电量为 85-90 瓦,极端情况下约为 110 瓦。
Off / Standby | 0.63 / 1.5 Watt |
Idle | 7.2 / / 9.2 Watt |
Load |
63.5 / 111.5 Watt |
Apple Mac Studio 2023 M2 Max M2 Max, M2 Max 30-Core GPU, Apple SSD AP0512Z, , x, | Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max M2 Max, M2 Max 38-Core GPU, Apple SSD AP2048Z, Mini-LED, 3456x2234, 16.20 | Apple Mac Studio 2022 M1 Max M1 Max, M1 Max 32-Core GPU, Apple SSD AP2048R, , x, | Apple Mac Mini M2 M2, M2 10-Core GPU, Apple SSD AP0512Z, , x, | Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro M2 Pro, M2 Pro 19-Core GPU, Apple SSD AP2048Z, Mini-LED, 3024x1964, 14.20 | Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ, , x, | Beelink SER7 R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8, , x, | Average Apple M2 Max 30-Core GPU | Average of class Desktop | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -41% | -17% | 63% | 15% | 4% | -1% | 0% | -121% | |
Idle Minimum * | 7.2 | 5.2 28% | 2.2 69% | 2.4 67% | 7 3% | 6.7 7% | 7.2 ? -0% | 21.4 ? -197% | |
Idle Maximum * | 9.2 | 16.8 -83% | 11.6 -26% | 2.6 72% | 11.5 -25% | 11.8 -28% | 11.6 -26% | 9.2 ? -0% | 27 ? -193% |
Load Average * | 63.5 | 113 -78% | 78.6 -24% | 28.7 55% | 59.6 6% | 45 29% | 64.1 -1% | 63.5 ? -0% | 91.5 ? -44% |
Load Maximum * | 111.5 | 145 -30% | 114 -2% | 51.5 54% | 100 10% | 97.2 13% | 94.8 15% | 111.5 ? -0% | 164.9 ? -48% |
Idle Average * | 16.5 | 11.3 | 9.2 | 7.3 | 23.5 ? | ||||
Witcher 3 ultra * | 92 | 55.9 | 75.8 |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption with external monitor
Pros
Cons
评价:Mac Studio 速度快、噪音低,但价格昂贵
AppleMac Studio 的 M2 Max SoC 也给我们留下了深刻的印象。这款小巧的台式电脑即使用于复杂的任务,如视频编辑和针对Apple 的 ARM SoC 进行了优化的本地应用,也能提供出色的性能。同时,这款小巧的设备在任何情况下都非常安静,即使在负载情况下,两个风扇也只会发出几乎听不到的呼呼声。对于它的连接选项,我们也没有什么负面意见--它配备了多个 Thunderbolt 4 端口以及标准的 10 Gbit/s 以太网连接。与小型 Mac Mini 不同的是,这款设备还配备了两个 USB-C 端口,正面还有一个快速读卡器。
Mac Studio 的核心可能是台式电脑,但其M2 Max是与 MacBook Pro 型号相同的移动处理器。MacBook Pro 的移动处理器。你还可以选择配备 M2 Ultra 的 Mac,它结合了两个 M2 Max SoC,再次大大提高了性能水平。即便如此,英特尔、AMD 或 Nvidia 的真正台式机部件在纯粹的性能方面要好得多,但在如此小巧的设备中也找不到这样的部件。
现代化的连接选项、出色的性能和几乎无声的运行:Apple Mac Studio 确实是一款出色的紧凑型台式电脑,但这也是有代价的。此外,该设备没有任何维护选项。
与 MacBook Pro 机型类似,我们对 Mac Studio 只有两点主要的批评意见。它虽然是台式电脑,但却没有任何维护选项。同样,我们也不得不提到基本机型的功能。32 GB 内存可能足够了,但 512 GB 的小型固态硬盘却不够用,速度也无法与大型固态硬盘相提并论。我们认为,基本型号应该配备 1 TB 的固态硬盘。
这就引出了第二个问题,即升级及其高昂的附加费用。当然,这台小巧的电脑可以升级到8 TB的固态硬盘存储空间是件好事,但Apple ,从512 GB升级到1 TB的价格却高得离谱。比较一下:1 TB 版本的超高速三星 980 Pro 目前售价约为 75 美元。
价格和供应情况
我们的测试版Apple Mac Studio 在亚马逊上的售价为 1,999 美元。
Apple Mac Studio 2023 M2 Max
-
09/19/2023 v7
Andreas Osthoff
Transparency
The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.