Redmi Pad 2 9.7 评测
红米 Pad 2 9.7 具备了您踏入平板电脑世界所需的一切。在我们看来，小米找到了一种很好的方法，确保因成本削减措施而产生的妥协在日常使用中几乎难以察觉。
乍一看，你几乎察觉不到这款入门级平板的价格。其选材、相当窄的屏幕边框以及流畅的 120Hz 面板，无疑散发出中端机型的质感。此外还提供配套的触控笔（虽无数位板），并且该平板支持通过 microSD 卡以实惠的价格扩展存储空间。 得益于9.7英寸的屏幕尺寸，Redmi Pad 机身相当轻巧，握持舒适，非常适合在大学日常使用，或作为学生平板电脑。
考虑到这个价位，其不足之处并不算太严重：任何仔细分析我们测试数据的人都会很快发现，新款骁龙芯片组的性能略显令人失望。 不过，如果你不让红米 Pad 2 9.7 进行多任务处理或游戏，也不同时运行流媒体播放或网页浏览等任务，它仍能提供不错的性能表现。值得庆幸的是，小米提供长期的系统更新，但性能储备不足的问题未来可能会成为瓶颈。
我们在屏幕亮度、Wi-Fi 速度和粉红噪声方面的其他测试结果，也印证了其亲民的价格定位。 如果你只愿意在此方面做出些许妥协，不妨看看我们对小米 Pad 8 的评测——不过，注重预算的消费者需要准备两倍于此的价格。
不过，以约 180 美元的价格，红米 Pad 2 9.7 依然物超所值。
Pros
Cons
小米红米平板 2 9.7 的价格和供货情况
Redmi Pad 2 9.7 搭载 64 GB 内置存储，建议零售价约为 190 美元，可在 amazon.com 等平台购买。此外还有 LTE 版本可供选择。
根据规格表，除配备 4 GB 内存的版本外，还有 6 GB 内存版本；但该版本目前似乎尚未在欧洲上市（截至目前）。若您不愿放弃这一配置，也可考虑设计完全相同的 Poco Pad C1。
- $159.99XIAOMI Redmi Pad 2 9.7" Only WiFi (No Calls or Text) 2K 120Hz Octa Core Global ROM 7600mAh Bluetooth 8MP Model 2603ARP14G (Gray, 64GB + 4GB)
- $159.99XIAOMI Redmi Pad 2 9.7" Only WiFi (No Calls or Text) 2K 120Hz Octa Core Global ROM 7600mAh Bluetooth 8MP Model 2603ARP14G (Silver, 64GB + 4GB)
- $182.75XIAOMI Redmi Pad 2 9.7" Only WiFi (No Calls or Text) 2K 120Hz Octa Core Global ROM 7600mAh Bluetooth 8MP Model 2603ARP14G (Gray, 128GB + 4GB)
Table of Contents
- Redmi Pad 2 9.7 评测
- Redmi Pad 2 9.7 规格参数
- 案例——采用铝合金一体式机身设计且具备IP防护等级的实惠小米平板
- 产品特点——配备 3.5 毫米耳机插孔的平价安卓平板电脑
- 软件 - Redmi Pad 2 9.7，搭载 Android 16 系统，支持 7 年系统更新
- 通讯 - 不支持 Wi-Fi 7 和 GPS 的入门级平板电脑
- 相机——Redmi Pad 2 9.7 配备 800 万像素摄像头，但不支持光学防抖
- 配件——不带充电器的入门级平板电脑
- 输入设备与操作——一款不带触控笔的实惠小米平板电脑
- 显示屏——配备 120 Hz 刷新率的 Redmi Pad 2 9.7 未采用 PWM 技术
- 性能——这款价格实惠的安卓平板电脑采用的是高通芯片组，而非联发科芯片组
- 排放量——散热能力极低的入门级平板电脑
- 电池续航时间
- Notebookcheck 综合评分
- 可能替代方案的比较
Redmi Pad 2 9.7 规格参数
案例——采用铝合金一体式机身设计且具备IP防护等级的实惠小米平板
初次接触红米 Pad 2 9.7 的用户，可能不会注意到它实惠的价格。其铝合金一体式机身外观精美，做工精良，令人印象深刻。
在该价位段中，其极高的屏占比设计也尤为突出。 屏幕占比高达近83%，占据了机身正面的大部分区域。相比之下，iPad 11的屏幕占比仅为80%。
这款小米平板通过了IPX2级防水认证，这意味着LTE版本即使在下雨天也能在户外使用。
产品特点——配备 3.5 毫米耳机插孔的平价安卓平板电脑
红米 Pad 2 9.7 的配置对于一款入门级平板电脑来说完全足够。任何想要扩展基础型号有限存储空间的用户，都可以通过 microSD 卡以实惠的价格实现这一目标。 经我们测试，其存储卡插槽的读写速度实际上相当快。得益于 USB-OTG 功能，还可以连接 USB 闪存盘。
不过，USB 2.0 接口速度较慢，且不支持有线视频输出。遗憾的是，这款小米平板还缺少指纹识别传感器。
| SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite (Angelbird V60) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 9.7 (Angelbird V60) | |
| Average of class Tablet (10.2 - 79.2, n=44, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 4G (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Lenovo Tab K11 Gen 2 (Angelbird V60) | |
跨平台磁盘测试 (CPDT)
软件 - Redmi Pad 2 9.7，搭载 Android 16 系统，支持 7 年系统更新
尽管红米 Pad 2 9.7 定位于入门级市场，但幸运的是，它能获得非常长期的系统更新。在小米安全中心，这款红米机型列出的支持期限将持续至 2033 年 4 月。此外，安全补丁计划每季度发布一次。 预计Android系统升级将支持至21版本。
对于关注LTE版本的用户，请注意：Redmi Pad 2 9.7的更新最早将于2029年停止。
在测试期间，这款小米平板预装了 Android 16 和 HyperOS 3 系统。它支持 HyperOS 互联功能，不仅能让小米设备之间相互连接，还能与 iPad 等苹果设备进行数据传输。
可持续发展——小米未提供其碳足迹的相关信息
在入门级平板电脑方面，小米并未将可持续性作为优先考虑。关于材料选择或回收利用的信息并未公开披露。可维修性也难以评估。在EPREL数据库中，这款小米平板电脑的可维修性等级被列为C级。
包装采用瓦楞纸板制成，似乎不含塑料。
通讯 - 不支持 Wi-Fi 7 和 GPS 的入门级平板电脑
这款配备 Wi-Fi 6 的小米平板电脑在与华硕参考路由器配对时，无法实现较高的数据传输速率；但在日常使用中，我们测得的 300 至 350 Mbps 的峰值速度对于大多数用户而言应该已经足够。
Redmi Pad 2 9.7的Wi-Fi版本不支持通过全球卫星网络进行定位追踪。需要在平板电脑上使用定位追踪功能的用户，必须选择配备A-GPS功能的4G版本。
| Networking | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 9.7 | |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 4G | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Lenovo Tab K11 Gen 2 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| Average of class Tablet | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
相机——Redmi Pad 2 9.7 配备 800 万像素摄像头，但不支持光学防抖
Redmi Pad 2 9.7 的正反两面均配备摄像头。这让你可以进行视频通话和拍摄文档——但功能也就仅此而已。 传感器非常小。这款小米平板的主摄像头使用的传感器与红米 Note 14 Pro 的超广角摄像头相同。视频仅支持以 1080p、30 fps 的帧率录制。
Image comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
SurroundingPlantLow Light
配件——不带充电器的入门级平板电脑
包装内容非常简陋。仅包含一条USB数据线。不包含快充适配器或保护壳。出厂时屏幕上也没有贴屏幕保护膜。
Redmi Stylus For Pad（建议零售价：约20美元）可作为选配配件购买。
输入设备与操作——一款不带触控笔的实惠小米平板电脑
Redmi Pad 2 9.7 仅通过前置摄像头采用 2D 面部识别技术进行生物识别；然而，这种方法的安全性并不高。在我们的测试中，在光线良好的条件下，这款小米平板电脑对我们的识别相当可靠。
触摸屏输入处理迅速，采样率高达 240 Hz。 由于LCD面板采用了层压工艺——这与iPad 11（2025）不同——因此触控输入也相当精准。Redmi Stylus For Pad 也受益于此。不过，该触控笔不带数位板，因此不具备掌心抑制功能，也不支持压力感应。
显示屏——配备 120 Hz 刷新率的 Redmi Pad 2 9.7 未采用 PWM 技术
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 86 %
Center on Battery: 418 cd/m²
Contrast: 1045:1 (Black: 0.4 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 2.92 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.69}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 3.4 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.94}
96.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.238
CCT: 6441 K
| Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 9.7 LCD TFT, 2048x1280, 9.7" | Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 4G TFT-LCD, 2560x1600, 11" | Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite TFT LCD, 2112x1320, 10.9" | Lenovo Tab K11 Gen 2 IPS LCD, 2560x1600, 11" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -25% | 4% | ||
| APL18 Peak Brightness (cd/m²) | 425 | 359 -16% | 423 0% | |
| HDR Peak Brightness (cd/m²) | 420 | 278 -34% | 451 7% | |
| Response Times | 4% | -31% | 8% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 36.2 ? | 33.04 ? 9% | 46 ? -27% | 38.4 ? -6% |
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 24 ? | 24.2 ? -1% | 32.5 ? -35% | 18.8 ? 22% |
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | 14990 | |||
| PWM Amplitude * (%) | ||||
| Screen | 16% | -5% | -30% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 418 | 398 -5% | 468 12% | 406 -3% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 416 | 354 -15% | 437 5% | 393 -6% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 86 | 84 -2% | 83 -3% | 93 8% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.4 | 0.28 30% | 0.26 35% | 0.42 -5% |
| Contrast (:1) | 1045 | 1421 36% | 1800 72% | 967 -7% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.92 | 1.6 45% | 3.74 -28% | 5.35 -83% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.88 | 3.2 34% | 8.51 -74% | 12.54 -157% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.4 | 3.2 6% | 5.5 -62% | 3 12% |
| Gamma | 2.238 98% | 2.67 82% | 2.234 98% | 2.5 88% |
| CCT | 6441 101% | 6542 99% | 7958 82% | 6323 103% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -2% /
7% | -18% /
-11% | -6% /
-18% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7625 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
我们使用照片分光光度计和 Calman 分析软件对色彩还原进行检测。在“标准”色彩模式下，我们获得了最佳效果。色彩和灰度还原的偏差虽不算特别低，但与竞争对手相比尚可接受，且在目标范围内（<3）。
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 11 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 13 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 55 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (19.7 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 36.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 19.9 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 16.3 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.13 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 53 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (30.7 ms). | ||
性能——这款价格实惠的安卓平板电脑采用的是高通芯片组，而非联发科芯片组
尽管红米 Pad 2 9.7 搭载的骁龙 6s 4G Gen 2 是 2025 年底发布的芯片组，但其仍采用“过时技术”，性能有限。 这款高通SoC采用四个Cortex-A73和四个Cortex-A53核心，每个核心运行频率为2.4 GHz。
这是否意味着这款小米平板在日常使用中运行流畅？完全不是。 不过，使用一段时间后，性能会稳定在可接受的水平，仅偶尔出现轻微卡顿。在我们测试的这款配备4 GB运行内存的机型中，考虑到未来发展，我们对运行内存容量不足这一问题持批判态度。
在CPU跑分测试中，红米Pad 2 9.7的得分非常低。
| Antutu v11 - Score | |
| Average of class Tablet (522205 - 4184631, n=12, last 2 years) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s 4G Gen 2 (n=1) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 9.7 | |
| UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI | |
| Average of class Tablet (3600 - 76852, n=53, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s 4G Gen 2 (3788 - 4431, n=2) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 9.7 | |
该设备集成了 Adreno 610 用于图形处理。任何曾希望 GPU 的表现能比 CPU 更具竞争力的人，都会因 GFXBench 的测试结果而打消这种念头。在 4K 测试中，帧率不足 2 fps 的表现极其糟糕。相比之下，Pad 8 在此处的帧率可达 31 fps。
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 9.7 | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 9.7 | |
| GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 9.7 | |
| GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 9.7 | |
| GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 9.7 | |
| GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 9.7 | |
| GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 9.7 | |
| GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 9.7 | |
| GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite | |
| Lenovo Tab K11 Gen 2 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 4G | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 9.7 | |
| GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite | |
| Lenovo Tab K11 Gen 2 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 4G | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 9.7 | |
| GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite | |
| Lenovo Tab K11 Gen 2 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 9.7 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 4G | |
| GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite | |
| Lenovo Tab K11 Gen 2 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 4G | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 9.7 | |
| GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 4G | |
| Lenovo Tab K11 Gen 2 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 9.7 | |
| Jetstream 2 | |
| 2.0 Total | |
| Average of class Tablet (48 - 420, n=54, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 4G (Chrome 137) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s 4G Gen 2 (n=1) | |
| 2.2 Total | |
| Average of class Tablet (61.3 - 579, n=45, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite (Chrome 140) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s 4G Gen 2 (79 - 92.5, n=2) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 9.7 (Chrome 153) | |
| Speedometer 2.0 - Result 2.0 | |
| Average of class Tablet (45 - 790, n=33, last 2 years) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s 4G Gen 2 (89.1 - 91.2, n=2) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 9.7 (Chrome 153) | |
| Speedometer 3 - Score 3.0 | |
| Average of class Tablet (3 - 49.1, n=49, last 2 years) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s 4G Gen 2 (4.78 - 6.33, n=2) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 9.7 (Chrome 153) | |
| WebXPRT 4 - Overall | |
| Average of class Tablet (54 - 376, n=53, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite (Chrome 140) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s 4G Gen 2 (n=1) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Tablet (4497 - 138481, n=69, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite (Chrome 140) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s 4G Gen 2 (19898 - 21044, n=2) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 9.7 (Chrome 153) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 9.7 (Chrome 153) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s 4G Gen 2 (1858 - 1945, n=2) | |
| Average of class Tablet (243 - 13119, n=64, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite (Chrome 140) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 9.7 | Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 4G | Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite | Lenovo Tab K11 Gen 2 | Average 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | Average of class Tablet | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -1% | -46% | -21% | -32% | 68% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s) | 1045.21 | 975.3 -7% | 523.85 -50% | 542.3 -48% | 785 ? -25% | 2098 ? 101% |
| Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s) | 808.51 | 913.33 13% | 237.31 -71% | 501.2 -38% | 421 ? -48% | 1691 ? 109% |
| Random Read 4KB (MB/s) | 209.85 | 214.81 2% | 241.12 15% | 232.1 11% | 159.4 ? -24% | 279 ? 33% |
| Random Write 4KB (MB/s) | 255.76 | 228.14 -11% | 62.52 -76% | 229.1 -10% | 181.8 ? -29% | 329 ? 29% |
排放量——散热能力极低的入门级平板电脑
温度
这款入门级平板电脑的表面温度并不成问题。为了检测内部是否存在热量积聚，我们通常会使用 3DMark 压力测试。然而，这些测试与 Redmi Pad 2 9.7 不兼容，GFXBench 电池测试也未能得出结果。不过，SoC 降频的可能性很小。
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 32.7 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.8 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.2 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
发言人
Redmi Pad 2 9.7 配备两个扬声器，协同工作以提供立体声效果。在中高音量下，可以听到明显的失真。然而，音频特征中缺乏低音，且粉红噪声也呈现出波浪状的频率响应。
若需使用外部音频输出，可通过有线的 3.5 毫米插孔或蓝牙 5.0 进行无线连接。不过，支持的编解码器种类相当有限。
Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 9.7 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 75% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 130%
Compared to all devices tested
» 75% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 136%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 4G audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 38% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 130%
Compared to all devices tested
» 28% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 136%
电池续航时间
能量摄入
这款小米平板采用的是较早一代电池，未使用 LIWINON 或 ATL 生产的硅碳负极。7,600 mAh 的电池容量相对于屏幕尺寸而言并不算大，且仅支持通过 USB-C 接口以最高 18 瓦的功率充电。 在我们的测试中，充满电大约需要 1.5 小时。它支持 QC 2.0 和 PD 2.0 协议。
红米 Pad 2 9.7 在待机状态下的功耗特别低。在此状态下，我们测得的平均功耗仅为 1.5 瓦。
| Off / Standby |   0.1 / 0.2 Watt |
| Idle |  1.2 / 1.5 / 2.1 Watt |
| Load |
4.7 / 8.1 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 9.7 7600 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 4G 9000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite 8000 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s 4G Gen 2 | Average of class Tablet | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -116% | -67% | 0% | -102% | |
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 1.2 | 0.89 26% | 2.3 -92% | 1.2 ? -0% | 2.16 ? -80% |
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 1.5 | 5.02 -235% | 2.8 -87% | 1.5 ? -0% | 3.9 ? -160% |
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 2.1 | 5.05 -140% | 3.1 -48% | 2.1 ? -0% | 4.29 ? -104% |
| Load Average * (Watt) | 4.7 | 6.8 -45% | 4.7 ? -0% | 8.87 ? -89% | |
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 8.1 | 13.1 -62% | 8.1 ? -0% | 14.4 ? -78% |
* ... smaller is better
功耗：Geekbench（150 cd/m²）
功耗：GFXbench（150 cd/m²）
电池续航时间
在我们的 Wi-Fi 测试中，这款入门级平板电脑在实际使用条件下展现出了 16.5 小时的出色续航表现，与同类产品不相上下。
| Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 9.7 7600 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 4G 9000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite 8000 mAh | Lenovo Tab K11 Gen 2 7040 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery runtime | -2% | -7% | -24% | |
| WiFi v1.3 (h) | 16.4 | 16.1 -2% | 15.3 -7% | 12.4 -24% |
| Reader / Idle (h) | 28 | |||
| Load (h) | 4.4 |
Notebookcheck 综合评分
Redmi Pad 2 9.7 是一款相对紧凑的安卓平板电脑，性价比极高。
Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 9.7
- 09/23/2026 v8
Marcus Herbrich
Total Sustainability Score: 可能替代方案的比较
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Drive | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 78.3%  | Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 9.7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s 4G Gen 2 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 610 ⎘ 4 GB Memory, 64 GB UFS 2.2 | List Price: 189€ | 406 g | 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 9.70" 2048x1280 249 PPI LCD TFT |
2. 77.6%  | Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 4G Mediatek Helio G100 ⎘ ARM Mali-G57 MP2 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.2 | Amazon: | 519 g | 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 11.00" 2560x1600 274 PPI TFT-LCD |
3. 79.9%  | Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite Samsung Exynos 1380 ⎘ ARM Mali-G68 MP5 ⎘ 6 GB Memory, 128 GB UFS 2.1 | List Price: 399€ | 524 g | 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 10.90" 2112x1320 228 PPI TFT LCD |
4. 77.9%  | Lenovo Tab K11 Gen 2 Mediatek Dimensity 6300 ⎘ ARM Mali-G57 MP2 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.2 | Amazon: $799.65 List Price: 270€ | 480 g | 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 11.00" 2560x1600 274 PPI IPS LCD |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Add as a preferred source on Google
