Notebookcheck Logo
三星Galaxy Tab S10 Lite 评测（图片来源：Marcus Herbrich）

公开透明的 5GAndroid 平板电脑，配备手写笔，价格低廉 - 三星Galaxy Tab S10 Lite 评测

400 美元的平板电脑更新时间都不会太长。

新款三星Galaxy Tab S10 Lite 是Galaxy Tab S11 的经济型替代产品，但仍配备 S Pen。得益于人工智能和可选的键盘盖，三星 Tab 的目标是成为预算有限的中小学或大学的理想伴侣。请继续阅读我们的中端平板电脑评测，了解这一计划是否可行。
Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
5G Touchscreen Tablet Samsung

结论 - 三星Galaxy Tab S10 Lite

Galaxy Tab S10 Lite 在组件方面肯定不是最便宜的 11 英寸平板电脑，但这款三星平板电脑凭借其较长的更新时间表以及公开透明的可持续发展特性获得了加分。有关生态足迹的信息在中国竞争对手中往往很少，尤其是在Galaxy Tab S10 Lite 的价格范围内。

不过，内置的 Exynos SoC 引起了人们的担忧，特别是考虑到计划使用时间超过 7 年。即使在我们的评测期间，Galaxy Tab 有时也显得有些力不从心，速度也不是特别快。除此之外，我们更希望在 400 美元的平板电脑上看到指纹传感器和亮度稍高的显示屏。

Pros

+ 包括 S Pen
+ 节流小
+ 更新时间长
+ 材料透明度
+ 内存扩展

Cons

- 迟钝的 SoC
- 亮度更高，校准更准确
- 仅 USB 2.0
- 电池续航能力一般
- 无指纹传感器

价格和供货情况 - 三星Galaxy Tab S10 Lite

Galaxy Tab S10 Lite 的起始零售价为 430 美元。顶级机型配备 5G、8 GB 内存和 256 GB 闪存，直接从制造商处购买售价为 499 美元。在撰写评论时，您可以在亚马逊网站上以 419 美元的价格购买 256 GB 机型和 Smart Book Cover。

Amazon Logo
$419.99
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite, 8GB RAM, 256GB, 2TB Expand, Long Battery Life, 10.9” LCD, S Pen for Note-Taking, Exynos 1380, Circle to Search, AI Tools, Gray
  • $383.80
    SAMSUNG Galaxy Tab S10 Lite 5G with S-Pen | 128GB, 6GB RAM, 5G + WiFi 6E | 10.9" 90Hz, Android 15 Tablet | International Model Unlocked for Global & T-Mobile (Makes Calls) | 256GB SD Bundle, Silver
  • $209.95
    Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite (2024) 10.4" 64GB WiFi Android Student Tablet, S Pen for Note-Taking, Gaming Ready, Long Battery Life, Expandable Storage, US Version, Oxford Gray, Amazon Exclusive

Galaxy Tab S10 Lite 的定位介于 Tab A9+ 和 Tab S10 Lite 之间。 Galaxy Tab A9+和 Galaxy Tab S10 FE.三星采用了 Fan Edition 的许多功能，但取代了内部的 Exynos 1580换成了速度较慢的 Exynos 1380取代了自产的 Exynos 1580，后者已用于 Galaxy Tab S9 FE.

我们对Galaxy Tab S10 Lite 的评测将证明，在旗舰机型之间再增加一款填补空白的产品是否有意义。 旗舰机型和廉价的 A 系列.

规格 - 三星Galaxy Tab S10 Lite

Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite (Galaxy Tab S10 Series)
Processor
Samsung Exynos 1380 8 x 2 - 2.4 GHz, ARM Cortex-A55 / A78
Graphics adapter
ARM Mali-G68 MP5
Memory
6 GB 
Display
10.90 inch 16:10, 2112 x 1320 pixel 228 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, native pen support, TFT LCD, Digitizer, HDR, 90 Hz
Storage
128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 104 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: USB-C, Card Reader: microSDXC up to 2TB, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: acceleration sensor, position sensor, E-compass, hall sensor,, UTG, Miracast
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.3, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 6.6 x 254.3 x 165.8
Battery
8000 mAh Lithium-Ion
Operating System
Android 15
Camera
Primary Camera: 8 MPix (AF)
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix (FF)
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, USB cable, info material, Samsung OneUI, 24 Months Warranty, IP42 | GLONASS, Galileo, compass, Beidou, QZSS, GPS, fanless
Weight
524 g
Price
399 Euro
Links
Samsung notebook section
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

外壳 - 采用金属一体成型机身的经济实惠型平板电脑

Galaxy Tab S10 Lite 颜色选择
Galaxy Tab S10 Lite 颜色选择

Galaxy Tab S10 Lite 重 524 克，对于一款 11 英寸平板电脑来说相对较重。不过，金属外壳给人一种坚固耐用的感觉，制造质量也令人印象深刻。磨砂背面手感极佳，几乎不会留下任何指纹。

显示屏周围的边框很宽，使得显示屏与正面的比例仅为 81.7%。从外观上看，Tab S10 Lite 更像是 Tab S6 Lite 的继任者。 Galaxy Tab S6 Lite (2024) 的继任者的继任者，而不是价格更高的 Tab S10 机型的替代产品。.

这款三星平板电脑通过了 IP42 认证--这在同价位产品中并不常见。虽然这在一定程度上提供了防尘和防溅保护，但Galaxy Tab S10 Lite 并不防水。

尺寸比较

❌
262.63 mm 177.53 mm 6.1 mm 515 g255 mm 167 mm 7.4 mm 530 g254.3 mm 165.8 mm 6.6 mm 524 g254.3 mm 165.8 mm 6 mm 497 g251.22 mm 173.42 mm 6.18 mm 500 g210 mm 148 mm 1 mm 2.9 g

功能 - 配备慢速 USB 端口的三星平板电脑

Galaxy Tab S10 Lite 配备 6 或 8 GB 内存和 128 或 256 GB 闪存。内部存储还可以通过 microSD 卡进行扩展。三星平板电脑使用速度较慢的 USB 2.0 端口进行连接，但支持 USB OTG，可轻松连接 USB 闪存驱动器或输入设备等外部设备。此外，还包括 Samsung Dex。

microSD 读卡器

与我们的参考卡 Angelbird V60 搭配使用时，Tab S10 Lite 可提供良好的复制速度，但与 Tab S10 FE 搭配使用时，Tab S10 Lite 的复制速度则要慢得多。 Tab S10 FE略胜一筹。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Samsung Exynos 1580 (Angelbird V60)
57.4 MB/s +15%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 1380 (Angelbird V60)
49.83 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
47.18 MB/s -5%
Average of class Tablet
  (10.2 - 58.4, n=60, last 2 years)
36.6 MB/s -27%

跨平台磁盘测试 (CPDT)

0102030405060708090100Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø42.1 (26.3-58.2)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø36.8 (29.7-46.3)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø69.4 (23.7-107)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø78 (60.4-86.2)

软件 -Android 平板电脑，更新时间长

三星的这款中端平板电脑使用其基于Android 15 的 OneUI 界面第 7 版。在进行本次评测时，Tab S10 Lite 使用的是 2025 年 7 月发布的过时安全补丁。不过，根据制造商的说法，与安全相关的更新将每季度发布一次。三星还承诺了七年的支持期，这对于这个价位的产品来说是非常好的。

结合附带的 S Pen，这款Galaxy 平板电脑提供手写识别功能，也涵盖数学公式和人工智能功能，如 Circle to Search。

三星Galaxy Tab S10 Lite 平板电脑评测
三星Galaxy Tab S10 Lite 平板电脑评测
三星Galaxy Tab S10 Lite 平板电脑评测

可持续性

三星提供了有关其Galaxy 平板电脑的可持续发展信息，如使用回收材料或关键原材料。不过，它尚未列入可持续发展报告。包装不含塑料。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 -Galaxy Tab S10 Lite 具有 5G 功能

Galaxy Tab S10 Lite 仅支持 Wi-Fi 6，这意味着在我们的测试中无法使用快速的 6 GHz 频段进行 Wi-Fi 传输。在 5 GHz 频段，与华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 搭配使用时，传输速度还算稳定，但数据连接速度不是特别快。

除了 Wi-Fi 版，三星还提供可选的 5G 版。后者可通过卡槽容纳一张 nanoSIM 卡。与 Tab S10+不支持 eSIM 卡。

Networking
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
525 (min: 313) MBit/s ∼55%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
739 (min: 275) MBit/s ∼78%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Wi-Fi 6E
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
642 (min: 539) MBit/s ∼36%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
746 (min: 680) MBit/s ∼47%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 (2025)
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
959 (min: 713) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
951 (min: 839) MBit/s ∼100%
Xiaomi Pad 7
Wi-Fi 6E
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
905 (min: 435) MBit/s ∼94%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
698 (min: 460) MBit/s ∼73%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1798 (min: 893) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1574 (min: 765) MBit/s ∼100%
Oppo Pad SE
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
154.9 (min: 115) MBit/s ∼16%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
431 (min: 331) MBit/s ∼45%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
832 (min: 295) MBit/s ∼87%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
826 (min: 234) MBit/s ∼87%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1172 (min: 417) MBit/s ∼65%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1252 (min: 743) MBit/s ∼80%
Average of class Tablet
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
543 (min: 10.5) MBit/s ∼57%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
609 (min: 20.1) MBit/s ∼64%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1240 (min: 578) MBit/s ∼69%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1478 (min: 746) MBit/s ∼94%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz: Ø642 (539-697)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz: Ø746 (680-772)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø525 (313-602)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø739 (275-870)
室内定位
室内定位
户外定位
户外定位

无论您选择的是 Wi-Fi 还是 5G 版本，用于定位的 GNSS 模块都是可用的。不过，我们的评测样品缺少无线调制解调器以及通过 A-GPS 定位的功能。除此之外，三星平板电脑还依赖于最常见的单频卫星系统。

Galaxy Tab S10 Lite 并非总能完美显示我们的位置，但与路线的偏差可以说是微乎其微。用于对比的 Garmin Venu 2 的显示结果也大体相似。不过，卫星定位的时间相对较长。

三星Galaxy Tab S10 Lite
三星Galaxy Tab S10 Lite
Garmin Venu 2
Garmin Venu 2

摄像头 - 带自动对焦功能的三星平板电脑

使用 500 万像素前置摄像头自拍
使用 500 万像素前置摄像头自拍

任何对中端平板电脑感兴趣的人都不应该对其后置摄像头抱有过高的期望。如果要拍照，最好还是使用智能手机，因为它的成像质量并不是特别高。但至少 800 万像素的传感器具有自动对焦功能。图像清晰度令人满意，足以将文件或笔记数字化。虽然色彩有一些异常值（大于 10），但对于平板电脑来说，与参考色彩的偏差是可以接受的。

1x
1x
2x
2x
4 倍（最大值）
4 倍（最大值）

Image comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Low Light
ColorChecker
9.1 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
14.3 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
12.4 ∆E
7 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
18.8 ∆E
10.9 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
14.6 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite: 9.88 ∆E min: 2.9 - max: 18.84 ∆E
ColorChecker
29.9 ∆E
51.2 ∆E
38.5 ∆E
34.8 ∆E
43.3 ∆E
55 ∆E
50.8 ∆E
33.7 ∆E
41.1 ∆E
28.4 ∆E
58.6 ∆E
61.7 ∆E
30.6 ∆E
45.8 ∆E
36.9 ∆E
69.8 ∆E
42.7 ∆E
41.1 ∆E
67.9 ∆E
67.1 ∆E
50.6 ∆E
37 ∆E
24.5 ∆E
14 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite: 43.96 ∆E min: 14.02 - max: 69.82 ∆E

配件和保修 -Galaxy Tab S10 Lite 不带充电器

Tab S10 Lite 随附一条 USB 线缆（双面 USB-C）、快速入门指南和 S Pen。三星还为其平板电脑提供了许多可选配件，如智能书套（零售价：80 美元）或书套键盘薄版（零售价：139 美元）。

在德国，三星提供 保修期长达 36 个月的保修服务。制造商还为 Tab S10 Lite 提供保险套餐。Care+ 起价 39 美元。

三星平板电脑随附 S Pen
三星平板电脑随附 S Pen

输入设备和操作 - 配备触控笔的经济型平板电脑

使用手指或 S Pen 均可精确操作 90 Hz 的触摸屏。由于有 4,096 级压力，手写笔记也非常容易，即使快速移动也几乎不会导致屏幕落后于触控笔笔尖。三星没有提供 Tab S10 Lite 的准确延迟时间。

不过，三星在内置的 Exynos 1380.由于 1320p 分辨率相对较高，UI 动画并不总是很流畅，系统经常出现卡顿，性能也不尽如人意。

遗憾的是，三星没有在其中档平板电脑上安装指纹传感器。只能通过前置摄像头进行二维面部识别。不过，这种验证方法安全性较低，而且在弱光环境下容易受到干扰。

显示屏 - 三星没有采用 OLED 显示屏

子像素排列
子像素排列

Galaxy Tab S10 Lite 配备了一块长宽比为 16:10 的 10.9 英寸 TFT 显示屏。面板像素密度约为 228 ppi，支持高达 90 Hz 的刷新率。

这款三星平板电脑的最大亮度为 598 cd/m²（APL18），对于一款中端设备来说具有非常不错的价值，即使在明亮的环境中也能获得令人满意的可读性。

Galaxy Tab S10 Lite 非常适合对屏幕闪烁敏感的用户，因为在我们的测试中没有检测到低频 PWM 闪烁。

448
cd/m²		437
cd/m²		390
cd/m²
443
cd/m²		468
cd/m²		439
cd/m²
417
cd/m²		442
cd/m²		445
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 468 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 436.6 cd/m² Minimum: 3.4 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 83 %
Center on Battery: 468 cd/m²
Contrast: 1800:1 (Black: 0.26 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 3.74 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.81}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 5.5 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5.1}
95.2% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.234
CCT: 7958 K
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite
TFT LCD, 2112x1320, 10.9"		Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
IPS, 2304x1440, 10.9"		Huawei MatePad 11.5 (2025)
IPS, 2456x1600, 11.5"		Xiaomi Pad 7
LCD, 3200x2136, 11.2"		Oppo Pad SE
IPS, 1920x1200, 11"
Screen
27%
-23%
7%
-1%
Brightness middle (cd/m²)
468
663
42%
623
33%
838
79%
518
11%
Brightness (cd/m²)
437
617
41%
578
32%
815
86%
507
16%
Brightness Distribution (%)
83
84
1%
90
8%
96
16%
93
12%
Black Level * (cd/m²)
0.26
0.39
-50%
0.99
-281%
0.88
-238%
0.34
-31%
Contrast (:1)
1800
1700
-6%
629
-65%
952
-47%
1524
-15%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
3.74
1.47
61%
2.9
22%
1.8
52%
4.54
-21%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
8.51
4.14
51%
5.3
38%
3.9
54%
7.97
6%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
5.5
1.4
75%
3.9
29%
2.5
55%
4.9
11%
Gamma
2.234 98%
2.199 100%
2.33 94%
2.25 98%
2.243 98%
CCT
7958 82%
6730 97%
7191 90%
6912 94%
7504 87%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8224 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

以固定变焦级别和不同亮度设置进行的一系列测量（最低亮度下的振幅曲线看似平缓，但这是缩放造成的。最小亮度下的振幅放大图可在信息框中查看）。

我们使用卡尔曼分析软件对色彩校准进行了分析。我们在 sRGB 色彩空间中测得的 DeltaE 值超出了目标范围（<3）。灰度还显示出轻微的蓝色色调。不过，0.26 cd/m² 的黑阶非常好，对比度约为 1,800:1，非常有吸引力。

色彩准确度（配置文件：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩准确度（配置文件：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩空间（轮廓：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩空间（轮廓：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
灰度（轮廓：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
灰度（轮廓：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
32.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 14.2 ms rise
↘ 18.3 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 88 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.4 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
46 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 25.2 ms rise
↘ 20.8 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 78 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (31.8 ms).

性能 - 配备三星芯片的Android 平板电脑

......（英文 Exynos 1380无论是在日常使用还是在基准测试中，Exynos 1380 都没有给人留下令人信服的印象。在 Geekbench 6 中，这款中端平板电脑的表现明显不如 Galaxy Tab S10 FE在 Geekbench 6 中，中端平板电脑的表现明显不如 Tab S10 FE，但不得不说，性能稍强的 三星 SoC是一款动力强劲的产品。

Geekbench 6.5 | Antutu v10 | PCMark for Android | CrossMark | BaseMark OS II | UL Procyon AI Inference for Android | AImark | Geekbench AI | AI Benchmark
Geekbench 6.5
Single-Core
Xiaomi Pad 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 12288
1893 Points +85%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 12288
1367 Points +34%
Average of class Tablet
  (185 - 3715, n=98, last 2 years)
1367 Points +34%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 (2025)
HiSilicon Kirin T82, Maleoon 920c, 8192
1311 Points +28%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
1021 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 1380
  (1008 - 1023, n=6)
1015 Points -1%
Oppo Pad SE
Mediatek Helio G100, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
691 Points -32%
Multi-Core
Xiaomi Pad 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 12288
5089 Points +73%
Average of class Tablet
  (848 - 14690, n=98, last 2 years)
4356 Points +48%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 12288
3921 Points +34%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 (2025)
HiSilicon Kirin T82, Maleoon 920c, 8192
3782 Points +29%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
2937 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 1380
  (2857 - 2937, n=6)
2887 Points -2%
Oppo Pad SE
Mediatek Helio G100, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
1661 Points -43%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Xiaomi Pad 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 12288
1408366 Points +139%
Average of class Tablet
  (164396 - 2854581, n=69, last 2 years)
1066657 Points +81%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 12288
894364 Points +52%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 (2025)
HiSilicon Kirin T82, Maleoon 920c, 8192
805755 Points +37%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
588186 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 1380
  (434759 - 602612, n=6)
563145 Points -4%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Xiaomi Pad 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 12288
15466 Points +21%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 12288
13344 Points +5%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 (2025)
HiSilicon Kirin T82, Maleoon 920c, 8192
13273 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
12738 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 1380
  (11259 - 13488, n=7)
12711 Points 0%
Average of class Tablet
  (3195 - 27428, n=85, last 2 years)
11772 Points -8%
Oppo Pad SE
Mediatek Helio G100, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
10703 Points -16%
CrossMark - Overall
Xiaomi Pad 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 12288
1098 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 12288
1052 Points
Average of class Tablet
  (227 - 2155, n=60, last 2 years)
921 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 1380
  (637 - 703, n=6)
662 Points
Huawei MatePad 11.5 (2025)
HiSilicon Kirin T82, Maleoon 920c, 8192
Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
Points
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Xiaomi Pad 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 12288
8323 Points +64%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 12288
6058 Points +19%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 (2025)
HiSilicon Kirin T82, Maleoon 920c, 8192
5578 Points +10%
Average of class Tablet
  (195 - 13159, n=65, last 2 years)
5494 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
5076 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 1380
  (4416 - 5076, n=7)
4630 Points -9%
System
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 12288
10013 Points +11%
Xiaomi Pad 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 12288
9977 Points +11%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
9003 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 1380
  (8316 - 9016, n=7)
8854 Points -2%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 (2025)
HiSilicon Kirin T82, Maleoon 920c, 8192
8837 Points -2%
Average of class Tablet
  (904 - 18343, n=65, last 2 years)
8794 Points -2%
Memory
Xiaomi Pad 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 12288
10045 Points +42%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 12288
7554 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
7053 Points
Huawei MatePad 11.5 (2025)
HiSilicon Kirin T82, Maleoon 920c, 8192
6472 Points -8%
Average of class Tablet
  (401 - 17963, n=65, last 2 years)
6443 Points -9%
Average Samsung Exynos 1380
  (4301 - 7059, n=7)
5307 Points -25%
Graphics
Xiaomi Pad 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 12288
24169 Points +27365%
Average of class Tablet
  (88 - 57192, n=65, last 2 years)
14098 Points +15920%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 12288
10293 Points +11597%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 (2025)
HiSilicon Kirin T82, Maleoon 920c, 8192
9728 Points +10955%
Average Samsung Exynos 1380
  (88 - 7126, n=7)
6067 Points +6794%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
88 Points
Web
Xiaomi Pad 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 12288
1887 Points +32%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 12288
1730 Points +21%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 (2025)
HiSilicon Kirin T82, Maleoon 920c, 8192
1723 Points +20%
Average of class Tablet
  (10 - 2370, n=65, last 2 years)
1465 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
1432 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 1380
  (1320 - 1533, n=7)
1400 Points -2%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Average of class Tablet
  (2597 - 76843, n=66, last 2 years)
15061 Points +140%
Xiaomi Pad 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 12288
13965 Points +122%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 12288
10741 Points +71%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 (2025)
HiSilicon Kirin T82, Maleoon 920c, 8192
9723 Points +55%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
6283 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 1380
  (5835 - 6320, n=7)
6094 Points -3%
AImark - Score v3.x
Average of class Tablet
  (138 - 55794, n=57, last 2 years)
4807 Points +772%
Xiaomi Pad 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 12288
1143 Points +107%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 (2025)
HiSilicon Kirin T82, Maleoon 920c, 8192
821 Points +49%
Average Samsung Exynos 1380
  (545 - 647, n=7)
596 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
551 Points
Geekbench AI
Single Precision NPU 1.5
Average of class Tablet
  (166 - 1483, n=19, last 2 years)
535 Points +169%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 (2025)
HiSilicon Kirin T82, Maleoon 920c, 8192
301 Points +51%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 12288
268 Points +35%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
199 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 1380
  (n=1)
199 Points 0%
Half Precision NPU 1.5
Average of class Tablet
  (154 - 9666, n=19, last 2 years)
2228 Points +531%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
353 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 1380
  (n=1)
353 Points 0%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 (2025)
HiSilicon Kirin T82, Maleoon 920c, 8192
303 Points -14%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 12288
270 Points -24%
Quantized NPU 1.5
Average of class Tablet
  (88 - 13178, n=19, last 2 years)
3229 Points +527%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 (2025)
HiSilicon Kirin T82, Maleoon 920c, 8192
657 Points +28%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 12288
634 Points +23%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
515 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 1380
  (n=1)
515 Points 0%
AI Benchmark
Score V5
Average of class Tablet
  (66.1 - 8305, n=10, last 2 years)
1384 Points
Huawei MatePad 11.5 (2025)
HiSilicon Kirin T82, Maleoon 920c, 8192
95.6 Points
Score V6
Xiaomi Pad 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 12288
3671 Points
Average of class Tablet
  (70.4 - 12784, n=23, last 2 years)
3637 Points
Huawei MatePad 11.5 (2025)
HiSilicon Kirin T82, Maleoon 920c, 8192
329 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 1380
  (n=1)
328 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 12288
300 Points

在图形任务中 1380及其安装的 GPU 单元也不是特别出色。其 Mali G68 MP5在 GFXBench 4K 测试中仅能达到 6fps，而 T-Rex 测试中的屏幕数值也表明，Tab S10 Lite 不值得期待 HFR 游戏。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Solar Bay Score | Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | Steel Nomad Light Score
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3107 Points +266%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1488 Points +75%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 (2025)
Maleoon 920c, Kirin T82, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
900 Points +6%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
848 Points
Oppo Pad SE
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
333 Points -61%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3098 Points +268%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1519 Points +80%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 (2025)
Maleoon 920c, Kirin T82, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
903 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
842 Points
Oppo Pad SE
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
339 Points -60%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
11654 Points +291%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5184 Points +74%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 (2025)
Maleoon 920c, Kirin T82, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3034 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2978 Points
Oppo Pad SE
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1212 Points -59%
3DMark / Solar Bay Score
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
Points
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
974 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
677 Points
Huawei MatePad 11.5 (2025)
Maleoon 920c, Kirin T82, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
267 Points
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
987 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
696 Points
Huawei MatePad 11.5 (2025)
Maleoon 920c, Kirin T82, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
261 Points
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +45%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
89 fps +7%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
83 fps
Huawei MatePad 11.5 (2025)
Maleoon 920c, Kirin T82, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps -28%
Oppo Pad SE
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
53 fps -36%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
501 fps +318%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 (2025)
Maleoon 920c, Kirin T82, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
172 fps +43%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
153 fps +28%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
120 fps
Oppo Pad SE
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
67 fps -44%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
111 fps +71%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
71 fps +9%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
65 fps
Huawei MatePad 11.5 (2025)
Maleoon 920c, Kirin T82, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
53 fps -18%
Oppo Pad SE
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
38 fps -42%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
297 fps +276%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
109 fps +38%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 (2025)
Maleoon 920c, Kirin T82, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
92 fps +16%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
79 fps
Oppo Pad SE
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
42 fps -47%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
63 fps +62%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
54 fps +38%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
39 fps
Huawei MatePad 11.5 (2025)
Maleoon 920c, Kirin T82, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
35 fps -10%
Oppo Pad SE
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
24 fps -38%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
198 fps +288%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
81 fps +59%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 (2025)
Maleoon 920c, Kirin T82, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
66 fps +29%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
51 fps
Oppo Pad SE
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
27 fps -47%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
36 fps +57%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
32 fps +39%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
23 fps
Huawei MatePad 11.5 (2025)
Maleoon 920c, Kirin T82, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
19 fps -17%
Oppo Pad SE
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
14 fps -39%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
113 fps +265%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
46 fps +48%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 (2025)
Maleoon 920c, Kirin T82, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
32 fps +3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
31 fps
Oppo Pad SE
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
16 fps -48%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
29 fps +71%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
25 fps +47%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
17 fps
Huawei MatePad 11.5 (2025)
Maleoon 920c, Kirin T82, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
16 fps -6%
Oppo Pad SE
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
9.7 fps -43%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
50 fps +257%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
22 fps +57%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 (2025)
Maleoon 920c, Kirin T82, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
18 fps +29%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
14 fps
Oppo Pad SE
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
6.5 fps -54%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
47 fps +81%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
37 fps +42%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 (2025)
Maleoon 920c, Kirin T82, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
27 fps +4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
26 fps
Oppo Pad SE
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
15 fps -42%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
131 fps +274%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
53 fps +51%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 (2025)
Maleoon 920c, Kirin T82, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
49 fps +40%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
35 fps
Oppo Pad SE
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
17 fps -51%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
23 fps +283%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9.7 fps +62%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 (2025)
Maleoon 920c, Kirin T82, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7.5 fps +25%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
6 fps
Oppo Pad SE
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2.7 fps -55%
Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | Speedometer 3.0 | WebXPRT 4 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total Score
Xiaomi Pad 7 (Chrome 135)
187.643 Points
Huawei MatePad 11.5 (2025) (Chrome 139)
171.344 Points
Average of class Tablet (22.3 - 393, n=68, last 2 years)
139.5 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 1380 (94.6 - 121.8, n=6)
109.7 Points
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE (Chrome 135)
194 runs/min
Huawei MatePad 11.5 (2025) (Chrome 139)
194 runs/min
Average of class Tablet (2.59 - 603, n=59, last 2 years)
173.3 runs/min
Xiaomi Pad 7 (Chrome 135)
145 runs/min
Average Samsung Exynos 1380 (70.5 - 127, n=5)
94.8 runs/min
Speedometer 3.0 - Score
Xiaomi Pad 7 (Chrome 135)
15.9 runs/min
Average of class Tablet (1.25 - 36.8, n=57, last 2 years)
14 runs/min
Huawei MatePad 11.5 (2025) (Chrome 139)
12.4 runs/min
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE (Chrome 135)
12.3 runs/min
Average Samsung Exynos 1380 (5.81 - 8.27, n=2)
7.04 runs/min
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Huawei MatePad 11.5 (2025) (Chrome 139)
152 Points +26%
Xiaomi Pad 7 (Chrome 135)
151 Points +25%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE (Chrome 135)
138 Points +14%
Average of class Tablet (26 - 315, n=74, last 2 years)
128.9 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite (Chrome 140)
121 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 1380 (97 - 123, n=7)
112.1 Points -7%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Pad 7 (Chrome 135)
66744 Points +70%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE (Chrome 135)
50864 Points +29%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 (2025) (Chrome 139)
48384 Points +23%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite (Chrome 140)
39283 Points
Average of class Tablet (763 - 111219, n=102, last 2 years)
38851 Points -1%
Average Samsung Exynos 1380 (33801 - 39283, n=7)
36241 Points -8%
Oppo Pad SE (Chrome 136)
20806 Points -47%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Tablet (319 - 27101, n=83, last 2 years)
2713 ms * -165%
Average Samsung Exynos 1380 (975 - 1209, n=7)
1113 ms * -9%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite (Chrome 140)
1023.4 ms *
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE (Chrome 135)
790.8 ms * +23%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 (2025) (Chrome 139)
729.32 ms * +29%
Xiaomi Pad 7 (Chrome 135)
564.8 ms * +45%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 LiteSamsung Galaxy Tab S10 FEHuawei MatePad 11.5 (2025)Xiaomi Pad 7Oppo Pad SEAverage 128 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5
216%
462%
614%
149%
36%
214%
Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s)
523.85
1602.8
206%
2172.43
315%
3911.82
647%
980
87%
761 ?(427 - 1043, n=115)
45%
1530 ?(126.9 - 4093, n=87, last 2 years)
192%
Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s)
237.31
1271.5
436%
2011.28
748%
3387.43
1327%
885.6
273%
296 ?(13.6 - 719, n=115)
25%
1124 ?(80.4 - 3773, n=87, last 2 years)
374%
Random Read 4KB (MB/s)
241.12
225.1
-7%
278.39
15%
311.09
29%
221.2
-8%
154 ?(92.6 - 241, n=115)
-36%
225 ?(20.1 - 475, n=87, last 2 years)
-7%
Random Write 4KB (MB/s)
62.52
204.2
227%
544.27
771%
344.51
451%
215.3
244%
130.4 ?(18.2 - 290, n=115)
109%
248 ?(9.1 - 745, n=87, last 2 years)
297%
No graph data

排放 - 三星平板电脑保持凉爽

温度

三星平板电脑的机箱在空载或负载情况下都没有出现高温。因此，3DMark 压力测试的性能非常稳定，我们也没有发现帧速率有任何下降。

Max. Load
 31.6 °C28.4 °C26.5 °C 
 39.9 °C28.6 °C27 °C 
 39.9 °C31.7 °C28.2 °C 
Maximum: 39.9 °C
Average: 31.3 °C
27 °C28.1 °C31.8 °C
27.4 °C28.5 °C37.2 °C
27.7 °C27.9 °C33.9 °C
Maximum: 37.2 °C
Average: 29.9 °C
Power Supply (max.)  42.3 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 31.3 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.9 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.2 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.2 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.

3DMark 压力测试

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Oppo Pad SE
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99 % 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
98.9 % 0%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 (2025)
Maleoon 920c, Kirin T82, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
98.8 % 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
98.6 %
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
86.9 % -12%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Huawei MatePad 11.5 (2025)
Maleoon 920c, Kirin T82, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.6 % 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
99.4 %
Oppo Pad SE
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
98.5 % -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
97.7 % -2%
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
89.4 % -10%
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.1 %
Huawei MatePad 11.5 (2025)
Maleoon 920c, Kirin T82, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99 %
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
98.6 %
051015202530Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.14.1: Ø5.04 (5.02-5.06)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø8.98 (8.89-9.1)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø17.8 (17.6-17.9)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø31.8 (31.6-32)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø5.01 (4.99-5.03)

发言人

Tab S10 Lite 的音效以中高频为主，在粉红噪声中并不能以真正线性的方式再现。低音几乎听不到，追求更有深度的用户可以通过蓝牙 5.3 无线或 USB 端口有线使用自己喜欢的耳机。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.845.22534.841.23127.435.34033.836.65040.741.76325.828.9801834.910018.1451252051.216018.757.320016.35925016.561.731519.464.740016.161.950015.965.263019.567.480018.367.6100014.674.7125014.976.8160014.475.4200013.772.6250012.974.9315015.773400017.268.8500019.363.9630018.471.9800020.179.61000016.777.81250017.3651600016.159.8SPL29.185.9N1.166.4median 16.7median 67.4Delta1.764643.639.138.333.237.337.836.540.139.725.529.416.535.917.744.819.551.617.457.215.86216.36414.767.51363.41767.920.669.12167.818.874.217.178.815.878.31475.912.473.512.271.212.56912.165.612.464.712.273.212.271.212.164.411.762.727.885.60.963.5median 14.7median 67.82.74.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy Tab S10 LiteSamsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 29% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 14% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 8% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

电池运行时间 -Android 平板电脑充电缓慢

耗电量

三星 Tab 及其 8000 毫安时电池的完整充电周期约为 2 小时，而小米 25000 电池的充电周期则为 2 小时。 小米 25000电源。这意味着耗电量远高于 2 瓦大关，因此不是特别高效。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 2.3 / 2.8 / 3.1 Watt
Load midlight 6.8 / 13.1 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite
8000 mAh		Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
8000 mAh		Huawei MatePad 11.5 (2025)
10100 mAh		Xiaomi Pad 7
8850 mAh		Oppo Pad SE
9340 mAh		Average Samsung Exynos 1380
 		Average of class Tablet
 
Power Consumption
16%
-81%
36%
7%
-17%
Idle Minimum * (Watt)
2.3
2.1
9%
1.25
46%
0.74
68%
1.259 ?(0.75 - 2.3, n=7)
45%
2 ?(0.7 - 5.6, n=79, last 2 years)
13%
Idle Average * (Watt)
2.8
2.5
11%
7.1
-154%
1.72
39%
2.85 ?(1.5 - 5.37, n=7)
-2%
3.77 ?(1 - 9.2, n=79, last 2 years)
-35%
Idle Maximum * (Watt)
3.1
2.9
6%
7.27
-135%
1.74
44%
3 ?(1.62 - 5.44, n=7)
3%
4.11 ?(1.3 - 9.5, n=79, last 2 years)
-33%
Load Average * (Watt)
6.8
5.8
15%
7.26
-7%
7.85 ?(3.6 - 15.8, n=7)
-15%
9.13 ?(2.5 - 34.9, n=75, last 2 years)
-34%
Load Maximum * (Watt)
13.1
7.9
40%
8.11
38%
12.5 ?(8.93 - 15.9, n=7)
5%
12.9 ?(4.6 - 41.6, n=75, last 2 years)
2%

* ... smaller is better

耗电量：Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

01234567891011121314Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite Samsung Exynos 1380; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø9.01 (4.19-14.7)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Samsung Exynos 1580; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø5.63 (2.02-11.9)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite Samsung Exynos 1380; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø3.1 (2.87-4.28)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Samsung Exynos 1580; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø2.11 (2.03-2.46)

功耗：GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

0123456789101112Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite Samsung Exynos 1380; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø8.71 (4.93-12.1)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Samsung Exynos 1580; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø7.27 (6.81-7.84)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite Samsung Exynos 1380; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø3.1 (2.87-4.28)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Samsung Exynos 1580; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø2.11 (2.03-2.46)

电池寿命

在显示屏亮度为 150 cd/m² 的 Wi-Fi 实际测试中，Galaxy Tab S10 Lite 在大约 15 小时后就耗尽了电量。

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 140)
15h 19min
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite
8000 mAh		Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
8000 mAh		Huawei MatePad 11.5 (2025)
10100 mAh		Xiaomi Pad 7
8850 mAh		Oppo Pad SE
9340 mAh
Battery runtime
WiFi v1.3 (h)
15.3
14.8
-3%
17.2
12%
18.1
18%
23.4
53%

Notebookcheck 总体评分

Galaxy Tab S10 Lite 评测
Galaxy Tab S10 Lite 评测

Galaxy Tab S10 Lite 是一款经济实惠的Galaxy ，但却牺牲了系统性能。

Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite - 09/26/2025 v8
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis
86 / 98 → 88%
Keyboard
70 / 80 → 88%
Pointing Device
91%
Connectivity
42 / 69 → 60%
Weight
83 / 40-88 → 89%
Battery
90%
Display
80%
Games Performance
13 / 65 → 19%
Application Performance
62 / 92 → 67%
AI Performance
18%
Temperature
92%
Noise
100%
Audio
83 / 91 → 91%
Camera
54 / 90 → 60%
Average
69%
80%
Tablet - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
65%
Packaging
90%
Power Use
94.1%
Repairability
68%
Software Updates
100%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 69.5%

可能的替代品比较

Image
Model / Review
Price
Weight
Drive
Display
1.
79.9%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 1380 ⎘
ARM Mali-G68 MP5 ⎘
6 GB Memory, 128 GB UFS 2.1		Amazon:
1. $419.99
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite,...
2. $383.80
SAMSUNG Galaxy Tab S10 Lite ...
3. $209.95
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite (...
List Price: 399€		524 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash10.90"
2112x1320
228 PPI
TFT LCD
2.
81.6%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Samsung Exynos 1580 ⎘
Samsung Xclipse 540 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB 		Amazon: $599.99
List Price: 779€		497 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash10.90"
2304x1440
249 PPI
IPS
3.
81.2%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 (2025)
Huawei MatePad 11.5 (2025)
HiSilicon Kirin T82 ⎘
HiSilicon Maleoon 920c ⎘
8 GB Memory, 256 GB 		Amazon:
1. $5.47
Mr.Shield Screen Protector c...
2. $11.90
Case Compatible with Huawei ...
3. $19.98
DWaybox Slim Folio Case for ...
515 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash11.50"
2456x1600
255 PPI
IPS
4.
85.9%
Xiaomi Pad 7
Xiaomi Pad 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 732 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB 		Amazon:
1. $389.00
Xiaomi Pad 7 Ai WiFi Version...
2. $596.98
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Ai WiFi Ver...
3. $389.56
XIAOMI Pad 7 Ai WiFi Version...
List Price: 400€		500 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash11.20"
3200x2136
344 PPI
LCD
5.
78.4%
Oppo Pad SE
Oppo Pad SE
Mediatek Helio G100 ⎘
ARM Mali-G57 MP2 ⎘
8 GB Memory, 128 GB UFS 2.1		Amazon:
1. $17.89
for OnePlus Pad Lite/Oppo Pa...
2. $13.01
A-BEAUTY Rotating Case Compa...
3. $12.99
Fast Wireless Charger,20W Ma...
List Price: 269€		530 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash11.00"
1920x1200
206 PPI
IPS

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 公开透明的 5GAndroid 平板电脑，配备手写笔，价格低廉 - 三星Galaxy Tab S10 Lite 评测
Marcus Herbrich, 2025-10- 2 (Update: 2025-10- 2)