Notebookcheck Logo
Apple iPad 11 A16 2025 tablet review (image source: Marcus Herbrich)

Apple iPad 11 (2025) 评测--这款经济实惠的平板电脑在最重要的方面落后了

Apple A16 是薄弱点吗？

Apple iPad 11 (2025) 为中端设备提供了高性能，因为它必须如此。这也是新版 iPad 10 的特色所在。遗憾的是，这款价格实惠的Apple 平板电脑在Apple 领域面临着与其前代产品同样的问题，此外还有强大的Android 竞争。
Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
iPad Touchscreen Tablet Apple

iPad 11 (2025) 评测 -Apple 在平板电脑的关键部位--显示屏上削减成本

iPad 11 是一款高品质的平板电脑，具有高透明度和（很可能）长期的软件支持。另一个积极的特点是Apple SoC，它的低散热和轻微的节流给人留下了深刻印象。

不过，与Android 竞争对手相比，iPad 11（2025）还存在一些弱点。宽显示屏边框和 IPS 面板的缺陷尤其明显。与 Air 机型不同，Apple 在防反射涂层方面做得不够，不支持 P3 色彩空间，而且显示屏的响应时间明显较慢。此外，这款Apple 平板电脑仅提供了一般的亮度，搭配的面板频率为 60 Hz，而且没有完全贴合--总而言之，并不是特别先进。不过，对于使用 iPad 9 或更老款产品的用户来说，应该还是比较满意的。

在Android 市场上，小米 Pad 7 等强劲的替代产品在许多方面都优于 iPad 11，而且性价比更高。从技术上讲，iPad 10 的飞跃并不大，因此 iPad 11 的前代产品也值得考虑。

Pros

+ 快速 SoC
+ 几乎不散热
+ 优质外壳...

Cons

- ... 厚边框
- 60 赫兹的慢速屏幕
- 面板没有完全贴合
- 保修期只有 12 个月
- 只有少数蓝牙音频编解码器
- 只有 USB 2.0

价格和供应情况

Apple iPad 11 的 Wi-Fi 版在亚马逊上没有销售，但可以直接从制造商处以 329 美元的起价购买。Apple ，需要额外支付高达 150 美元的 5G 调制解调器费用，如果需要双倍的存储空间，还需要额外支付 100 美元。

Amazon Logo
$299.00
Apple iPad 11-inch: A16 chip, 11-inch Model, Liquid Retina Display, 128GB, Wi-Fi 6, 12MP Front/12MP Back Camera, Touch ID, All-Day Battery Life — Silver
  • $599.00
    Apple iPad Air 11-inch with M3 chip Built for Apple Intelligence, Liquid Retina Display, 256GB, 12MP Front/Back Camera, Wi-Fi 6E, Touch ID, All-Day Battery Life — Space Gray
  • $6.98
    Ailun Screen Protector for iPad 11th A16 2025 [11 Inch] / 10th Generation 2022 [10.9 Inch], Tempered Glass [Face ID & Apple Pencil Compatible] Ultra Sensitive Case Friendly [2 Pack]

除了 iPad Air与 Apple M3之外，加利福尼亚制造商还对第十代 iPad 进行了升级。新款 iPad 11 尤其受益于 SoC 的改进，从 Apple A14 仿生升级到 Apple A16 仿生.此外，基本机型的内部存储空间也从 64 GB 倍增到 128 GB。除此之外，iPad 的机型更新没有太大变化。

Apple iPad 11 (2025) 规格

Apple iPad 11 (2025) (iPad Series)
Processor
Apple A16 Bionic 6 x 2 - 3.5 GHz, Crete
Graphics adapter
Apple A16 GPU 4-Core
Memory
6 GB 
, DDR5-6400
Display
10.86 inch 3:2, 2360 x 1640 pixel 265 PPI, Capacitive Touchscreen, native pen support, IPS, glossy: yes, HDR, 60 Hz
Storage
128 GB NVMe, 128 GB 
, 105 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Barometer, acceleration sensor, ​position sensor
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.3
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7 x 248.6 x 179.5
Battery
28.93 Wh, 7698 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Apple iPadOS 18
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix (f/1.8, Smart HDR 4, 5P, 4k-video)
Secondary Camera: 12 MPix (Ultra Wide, 122°, f/2.4, 1080p-video)
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: OnScreen, USB cable, info material, 12 Months Warranty, BT-Codecs: SBC, AAC, fanless
Weight
477 g
Price
399 Euro
Links
Apple homepage
iPad (Series)
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

保护套 -Apple iPad 11 采用铝合金一体成型机身

Apple iPad A16 颜色选择（图片来源： )Apple
Apple iPad A16 颜色选择（图片来源： )Apple

一体成型的铝金属外壳做工精良，iPad 11 在质量方面也毫不逊色。背面的磨砂处理也不会留下指纹。

iPad 11 的重量仅为 477 克，对于这种尺寸的平板电脑来说非常轻便，即使长时间使用也能轻松驾驭。遗憾的是，约 80% 的屏占比并不适合日常使用。这也是 Android在这方面，竞争对手的设计要现代得多。Apple 平板电脑还缺乏 IP 认证。

Apple iPad 11 A16 2025 平板电脑评测（图片来源：Marcus Herbrich）
Apple iPad 11 A16 2025 平板电脑评测（图片来源：Marcus Herbrich）
Apple iPad 11 A16 2025 平板电脑评测（图片来源：Marcus Herbrich）

尺寸比较

❌
268.7 mm 195 mm 6.49 mm 584 g259.1 mm 176.1 mm 6.1 mm 475 g251.22 mm 173.42 mm 6.18 mm 500 g248.6 mm 179.5 mm 7 mm 477 g248.6 mm 179.5 mm 7 mm 477 g210 mm 148 mm 1 mm 2.9 g

功能 - iPad 2025 仅配备 USB 2.0

最便宜的 iPad 仍然使用速度较慢的 USB 2.0 端口。在测试中，我们使用三星 980 Pro（M2 固态硬盘）测得的数据传输速度最高为 39 MB/s。连接的存储设备不能使用 NTFS 或 exFAT 格式化，但支持Apple 自带的文件系统 (APFS)。不过，USB 端口允许使用合适的适配器进行有线图像输出。

与 iPad 10Apple 将 2025 版的 RAM 增加到 6 GB，但这还不足以使用内部人工智能 "Apple 智能"，因为它至少需要 8 GB 的 RAM。

软件 -Apple 平板电脑搭载 iPadOS 18

Apple iPad 11 搭载的是 iPadOS 18.3。令人惊讶的是，Apple ，其入门级平板电脑仍然不支持Apple Intelligence。制造商也仍然没有为这款 iPad 提供官方更新保证，但历史数据显示，软件维护很可能会持续到 2030 年。

Apple iPad 11 A16 2025 平板电脑评测
Apple iPad 11 A16 2025 平板电脑评测
Apple iPad 11 A16 2025 平板电脑评测

可持续性

iPad 11 的包装不含塑料。在可持续发展方面，Apple 在描述其材料组合时体现了细致和透明。例如，根据环境报告，iPad 11 的外壳只使用了可回收的铝，稀土也是可回收的。此外，还精确地说明了该设备在整个生命周期内的碳足迹。

通信 -Apple 配备 WiFi 6 的 iPad 11

iPad 11 可通过蓝牙 5.3 和 WiFi 6 进行无线通信。当与华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 配对使用时，Apple ，该平板电脑的传输速度可达到约 1,000 Mbps。不过，在这个价格范围内，它的表现肯定会更好，因为 WiFi 7 小米 Pad 7所示。

小米 Pad 7 还可选配 5G 调制解调器，与 eSIM 卡连接后可实现定位功能。不过，我们的 Wi-Fi 版本允许Apple 平板电脑使用 Wi-Fi、数字罗盘和 iBeacon 微定位来确定自己的位置，但这还不足以完成导航任务。

Networking
Apple iPad 11 (2025)
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
976 (min: 962) MBit/s ∼93%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
867 (min: 554) MBit/s ∼65%
Apple iPad 10
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
816 (min: 764) MBit/s ∼78%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
741 (min: 621) MBit/s ∼55%
Xiaomi Pad 7
Wi-Fi 6E
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
905 (min: 435) MBit/s ∼86%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
698 (min: 460) MBit/s ∼52%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1798 (min: 893) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1574 (min: 765) MBit/s ∼95%
Honor Pad V9
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1051 (min: 925) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1336 (min: 1285) MBit/s ∼100%
OnePlus Pad 2
Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
895 (min: 675) MBit/s ∼50%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1652 (min: 1472) MBit/s ∼100%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
859 (min: 305) MBit/s ∼82%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
831 (min: 234) MBit/s ∼62%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1256 (min: 614) MBit/s ∼70%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1228 (min: 743) MBit/s ∼74%
Average of class Tablet
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
550 (min: 10.5) MBit/s ∼52%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
541 (min: 20.1) MBit/s ∼40%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1253 (min: 578) MBit/s ∼70%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1402 (min: 746) MBit/s ∼85%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950100010501100115012001250130013501400145015001550160016501700175018001850Tooltip
Xiaomi Pad 7 Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1768 (893-1866)
Xiaomi Pad 7 Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1548 (765-1607)
Apple iPad 11 (2025) 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø976 (962-992)
Xiaomi Pad 7 Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø891 (435-974)
Apple iPad 11 (2025) 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø866 (554-892)
Xiaomi Pad 7 Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø698 (460-923)

摄像头 - iPad 2025 配备单摄像头

与 iPad 11 自拍
与 iPad 11 自拍

隐藏在 iPad 11 正面的是一个 1200 万像素超广角摄像头，它支持公司专有的 Centre Stage 模式，可用于视频会议。不过，视频仍然只能以每秒 60 帧的速度录制 1080p 格式。在光线充足的情况下，照片质量是可以接受的，但Apple 在其入门级平板电脑上省略了自动对焦功能。

背面的主摄像头也采用了 1200 万像素，f/1.8 大光圈。与 前代，现在支持智能 HDR 4。日光下拍摄的照片在日常情况下具有良好的色彩还原性，不过 iPad 11 在显示拍摄对象时往往会有些偏暖。有时，照片还会显示出明显的偏红色调。虽然噪点也比较明显，但该相机仍然非常适合拍摄文档。

1x
1x
2.5x
2.5x
5 倍（最大值）
5 倍（最大值）

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

RabbitPondLow lightZoom 5x
orginal image
click to load images
ColorChecker
4.3 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
2 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
6 ∆E
2.8 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
6 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
2.8 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
ColorChecker Apple iPad 11 (2025): 5.2 ∆E min: 1.98 - max: 8.08 ∆E
ColorChecker
30.2 ∆E
55.1 ∆E
39.8 ∆E
34.8 ∆E
45.6 ∆E
62 ∆E
53.5 ∆E
36.1 ∆E
44.2 ∆E
29 ∆E
64.7 ∆E
63.9 ∆E
31.5 ∆E
47.1 ∆E
37.8 ∆E
76.2 ∆E
44.6 ∆E
41.6 ∆E
92.9 ∆E
71 ∆E
52.5 ∆E
36.9 ∆E
23.8 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Apple iPad 11 (2025): 47.01 ∆E min: 13.42 - max: 92.94 ∆E

配件和保修 -Apple iPad 11 不含充电器

Magic Keyboard Folio 需单独购买
Magic Keyboard Folio 需单独购买

Apple 确实提供了多种可选配件，但价格不菲。例如，Magic Keyboard Folio（建议零售价：229 美元）与 Pencil Gen. 1（建议零售价：89 美元）的组合比平板电脑本身还贵。例如，Magic Keyboard Folio（建议零售价：229 美元）与Apple Pencil Gen. 1（建议零售价：89 美元）的组合比平板电脑本身还要贵。Smart Folios（建议零售价：99 美元）有配套的外壳颜色，价格也不便宜。

保修 保修期保修期只有 12 个月，但不影响零售商的保修。 Apple 平板电脑可选择购买 Care+（建议零售价：59 美元）。

输入设备和操作 -Apple 平板电脑支持Apple Pencil

电容式触摸屏对手指输入的响应良好可靠。除了Apple Pencil Gen 1 之外，iPad 11 还借助 USB-C 接口支持Apple Pencil。不过，后者的压力灵敏度较低，不适合在 10.86 英寸显示屏上绘图。除此之外，Apple ，这款入门级平板电脑的显示屏仍未完全贴合，显示屏与保护玻璃之间留有缝隙。在使用 Pencil 时，它似乎会略微悬浮在内容上方。

iPad 11 使用 Touch ID 进行解锁。指纹传感器集成在平板电脑左侧的电源按钮上，在日常使用中，它的工作可靠而迅速。

Apple iPad 11 A16 2025 平板电脑评测
Apple iPad 11 A16 2025 平板电脑评测
Apple iPad 11 A16 2025 平板电脑评测

显示屏 - iPad 11 和 Liquid Retina

LC 显示器采用经典的 RGB 子像素矩阵，由一个红色、一个蓝色和一个绿色 LED 组成。
LC 显示器采用经典的 RGB 子像素矩阵，由一个红色、一个蓝色和一个绿色 LED 组成。

与 前代与前代产品不同的是，Apple ，第 11 代产品的显示屏被宣传为 11 英寸，这并没有使它比 iPad 10 的 10.86 英寸面板更大。IPS 显示屏提供 2360 x 1640 像素，因此像素密度只有 265 PPI。iPad 11 不提供 DCI P3 色彩空间，也没有防反射涂层，例如在 Air 机型.面板的响应时间也明显较慢。

我们的测量结果也达到了制造商规定的 500 尼特。峰值亮度仅略有不同（APL18：547 cd/m²，HDR：546 cd/m²）。最大亮度可以接受，但 iPad 11 的面板并不特别亮。即使在播放 HDR 内容时，也只能看到部分动态范围效果。

538
cd/m²		544
cd/m²		538
cd/m²
548
cd/m²		526
cd/m²		535
cd/m²
516
cd/m²		512
cd/m²		518
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 548 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 530.6 cd/m² Minimum: 2.83 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 526 cd/m²
Contrast: 531:1 (Black: 0.99 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.86
ΔE Greyscale 2.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.1
96.2% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.14
Apple iPad 11 (2025)
IPS, 2360x1640, 10.9"		Apple iPad 10
IPS, 2360x1640, 10.9"		Xiaomi Pad 7
LCD, 3200x2136, 11.2"		Honor Pad V9
IPS, 2800x1840, 11.5"		OnePlus Pad 2
IPS, 3000x2120, 12.1"
Screen
21%
28%
-134%
50%
Brightness middle
526
467
-11%
838
59%
543
3%
833
58%
Brightness
531
468
-12%
815
53%
501
-6%
771
45%
Brightness Distribution
93
92
-1%
96
3%
89
-4%
84
-10%
Black Level *
0.99
0.49
51%
0.88
11%
0.62
37%
0.45
55%
Contrast
531
953
79%
952
79%
876
65%
1851
249%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.9
1.4
26%
1.8
5%
12.4
-553%
1.79
6%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
4
3.3
17%
3.9
2%
15.9
-298%
4.01
-0%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.9
2.3
21%
2.5
14%
12.1
-317%
3
-3%
Gamma
2.14 103%
2.21 100%
2.25 98%
0.58 379%
2.254 98%
CCT
6982 93%
6852 95%
6912 94%
6175 105%
6419 101%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 21120 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 21120 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 21120 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8460 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

IPS 显示屏的黑度大幅提高。这导致对比度不够理想。在 iPad 11 上，黑色色调显得更加灰暗。在使用光谱仪和 CalMAN 进行色彩分析时，Apple 平板电脑的表现比前代产品更差。 前代产品但成像性能仍然很好。

色彩准确度（禁用真实色调，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩准确度（禁用真实色调，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩空间（禁用 "真实色调"，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩空间（禁用 "真实色调"，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
灰度（禁用真实色调，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
灰度（禁用真实色调，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩饱和度（禁用真实色调，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩饱和度（禁用真实色调，目标色彩空间：sRGB）

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
32.59 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 18.18 ms rise
↘ 14.41 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 87 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.7 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
43.55 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 21.22 ms rise
↘ 22.33 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 71 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.4 ms).

在室外，iPad 11 只能在阴凉处清晰辨认，而一旦阳光照射，其表面的显示屏反光就会让人极为分心。可视角度稳定，液晶显示屏上几乎没有光斑。

性能 - 配备Apple A16 的 iPad 11

与Android 竞争对手相比，iPad 11 的最大优势在于其作为一款中端设备所拥有的巨大 CPU 性能。处理器 Apple A16在 Geekbench 上的多核和单核性能都明显优于 骁龙 7+ Gen 3的 小米 Pad 7.不过，即使是与前代产品相比，iPad 11 采用了更新两年的芯片组，性能也有两位数的提升。

Geekbench 6.4 | Antutu v10 | Geekbench AI
Geekbench 6.4
Single-Core
Average Apple A16 Bionic
  (2465 - 2644, n=5)
2574 Points 0%
Apple iPad 11 (2025)
Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 4-Core, 6144
2566 Points
Xiaomi Pad 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 12288
1893 Points -26%
Honor Pad V9
MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
1359 Points -47%
Average of class Tablet
  (185 - 3715, n=86, last 2 years)
1204 Points -53%
OnePlus Pad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
954 Points -63%
Multi-Core
Average Apple A16 Bionic
  (5939 - 6923, n=5)
6448 Points +9%
Apple iPad 11 (2025)
Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 4-Core, 6144
5939 Points
Xiaomi Pad 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 12288
5089 Points -14%
OnePlus Pad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
4564 Points -23%
Honor Pad V9
MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
4119 Points -31%
Average of class Tablet
  (493 - 14690, n=86, last 2 years)
3872 Points -35%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Average Apple A16 Bionic
  (1388868 - 1464078, n=4)
1413008 Points +2%
Xiaomi Pad 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 12288
1408366 Points +1%
Apple iPad 11 (2025)
Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 4-Core, 6144
1388868 Points
Honor Pad V9
MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
1133809 Points -18%
Average of class Tablet
  (164396 - 2716980, n=51, last 2 years)
888118 Points -36%
Geekbench AI
Half Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2
Honor Pad V9
MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
4545 Points
Average of class Tablet
  (84 - 4545, n=10, last 2 years)
1100 Points
Xiaomi Pad 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 12288
401 Points
Half Precision Core ML Neural Engine 1.2
Apple iPad 11 (2025)
Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 4-Core, 6144
25011 Points
Average Apple A16 Bionic
  (22072 - 25011, n=2)
23542 Points -6%
Average of class Tablet
  (6923 - 36754, n=5, last 2 years)
21291 Points -15%
Quantized Core ML Neural Engine 1.2
Average Apple A16 Bionic
  (25431 - 26006, n=2)
25719 Points +1%
Apple iPad 11 (2025)
Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 4-Core, 6144
25431 Points
Average of class Tablet
  (5648 - 51561, n=5, last 2 years)
24532 Points -4%
Single Precision Core ML Neural Engine 1.2
Average of class Tablet
  (3575 - 4823, n=5, last 2 years)
4157 Points +16%
Apple iPad 11 (2025)
Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 4-Core, 6144
3575 Points
Average Apple A16 Bionic
  (3564 - 3575, n=2)
3570 Points 0%

集成的 Apple A16 GPU负责图形计算，确保了良好的性能。与 CPU 不同，Android 的竞争对手可以轻松赶上 iPad 11，尤其是强大的 Adreno 732的 小米 Pad 7.与 iPhone 不同，iPad 11 只配备了 4 核 GPU。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Solar Bay Score | Solar Bay Unlimited Score | Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | Steel Nomad Light Score
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4454 Points +74%
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3107 Points +21%
Honor Pad V9
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2594 Points +1%
Apple iPad 11 (2025)
A16 GPU 4-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
2559 Points
Apple iPad 10
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD
2124 Points -17%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4485 Points +72%
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3098 Points +19%
Honor Pad V9
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2649 Points +1%
Apple iPad 11 (2025)
A16 GPU 4-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
2611 Points
Apple iPad 10
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD
2250 Points -14%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
11654 Points +10%
Apple iPad 11 (2025)
A16 GPU 4-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
10598 Points
Honor Pad V9
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9759 Points -8%
Apple iPad 10
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD
8539 Points -19%
3DMark / Solar Bay Score
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8315 Points +125%
Honor Pad V9
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4738 Points +28%
Apple iPad 11 (2025)
A16 GPU 4-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
3698 Points
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
Points -100%
3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8321 Points +128%
Honor Pad V9
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4613 Points +26%
Apple iPad 11 (2025)
A16 GPU 4-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
3654 Points
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1626 Points
Honor Pad V9
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1093 Points
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
974 Points
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1639 Points
Honor Pad V9
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1137 Points
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
987 Points
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +100%
Apple iPad 10
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD
60 fps 0%
Honor Pad V9
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps 0%
Apple iPad 11 (2025)
A16 GPU 4-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
501 fps +32%
Apple iPad 11 (2025)
A16 GPU 4-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
378.9 fps
Honor Pad V9
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
375 fps -1%
Apple iPad 10
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD
317 fps -16%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
111 fps +85%
Apple iPad 10
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD
60 fps 0%
Honor Pad V9
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps 0%
Apple iPad 11 (2025)
A16 GPU 4-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
297 fps +45%
Apple iPad 11 (2025)
A16 GPU 4-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
205.2 fps
Apple iPad 10
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD
171 fps -17%
Honor Pad V9
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
151 fps -26%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
63 fps +5%
Apple iPad 11 (2025)
A16 GPU 4-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps
Honor Pad V9
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
59 fps -2%
Apple iPad 10
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD
58 fps -3%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
198 fps +40%
Apple iPad 11 (2025)
A16 GPU 4-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
141.6 fps
Apple iPad 10
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD
120 fps -15%
Honor Pad V9
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
116 fps -18%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Apple iPad 11 (2025)
A16 GPU 4-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
57.6 fps
Apple iPad 10
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD
45 fps -22%
Honor Pad V9
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
44 fps -24%
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
36 fps -37%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
113 fps +25%
Apple iPad 11 (2025)
A16 GPU 4-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
90.3 fps
Honor Pad V9
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
85 fps -6%
Apple iPad 10
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD
75 fps -17%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
42 fps +3%
Apple iPad 11 (2025)
A16 GPU 4-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
40.9 fps
Apple iPad 10
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD
34 fps -17%
Honor Pad V9
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
33 fps -19%
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
29 fps -29%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
69 fps +72%
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
50 fps +25%
Honor Pad V9
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
45 fps +12%
Apple iPad 11 (2025)
A16 GPU 4-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
40.1 fps
Apple iPad 10
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD
32 fps -20%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Apple iPad 11 (2025)
A16 GPU 4-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
55.9 fps
Honor Pad V9
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
51 fps -9%
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
50 fps -11%
Apple iPad 10
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD
47 fps -16%
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
47 fps -16%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
170 fps +63%
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
131 fps +26%
Honor Pad V9
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
116 fps +11%
Apple iPad 11 (2025)
A16 GPU 4-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
104.1 fps
Apple iPad 10
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD
94 fps -10%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
32 fps +92%
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
23 fps +38%
Honor Pad V9
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
20 fps +20%
Apple iPad 11 (2025)
A16 GPU 4-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
16.7 fps
Apple iPad 10
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD
16 fps -4%
Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 3.0 | WebXPRT 4 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total Score
Average Apple A16 Bionic (228 - 282, n=5)
261 Points +2%
Apple iPad 11 (2025) (Chrome 135)
255.763 Points
Xiaomi Pad 7 (Chrome 135)
187.643 Points -27%
Apple iPad 10 (Safari Mobile 16.1)
178.932 Points -30%
Honor Pad V9 (Chrome 134.0.6998.96)
138.702 Points -46%
Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 393, n=72, last 2 years)
129.1 Points -50%
Speedometer 3.0 - Score
Apple iPad 11 (2025) (Chrome 135)
22.7 runs/min
Average Apple A16 Bionic (n=1)
22.7 runs/min 0%
Xiaomi Pad 7 (Chrome 135)
15.9 runs/min -30%
Average of class Tablet (1.25 - 34.4, n=42, last 2 years)
14 runs/min -38%
Honor Pad V9
12.3 runs/min -46%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Apple iPad 11 (2025) (Chrome 135)
236 Points
Average Apple A16 Bionic (201 - 236, n=3)
213 Points -10%
Xiaomi Pad 7 (Chrome 135)
151 Points -36%
Honor Pad V9 (Chrome 134.0.6998.96)
148 Points -37%
Apple iPad 10 (Safari Mobile 16.1)
147 Points -38%
Average of class Tablet (21 - 315, n=71, last 2 years)
119 Points -50%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPad 11 (2025) (Chrome 135)
74543 Points
Average Apple A16 Bionic (68554 - 75718, n=5)
73020 Points -2%
Xiaomi Pad 7 (Chrome 135)
66744 Points -10%
Apple iPad 10 (Safari Mobile 16.1)
59963 Points -20%
Honor Pad V9 (Chrome 134.0.6998.96)
49086 Points -34%
OnePlus Pad 2 (Chrome 128)
45083 Points -40%
Average of class Tablet (763 - 111219, n=94, last 2 years)
34919 Points -53%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=80, last 2 years)
3315 ms * -706%
Honor Pad V9 (Chrome 134.0.6998.96)
847.4 ms * -106%
Xiaomi Pad 7 (Chrome 135)
564.8 ms * -37%
Apple iPad 10 (Safari Mobile 16.1)
547 ms * -33%
Average Apple A16 Bionic (411 - 506, n=5)
463 ms * -13%
Apple iPad 11 (2025) (Chrome 135)
411.4 ms *

* ... smaller is better

排放 -Apple 平板电脑只会变热

温度

A16 Apple A16 的在 Wild Life 3DMark 压力测试中，iPad 11 的表现相当稳定。

Max. Load
 33.5 °C34.6 °C36.4 °C 
 31.2 °C32.5 °C33.5 °C 
 30.7 °C32.2 °C33 °C 
Maximum: 36.4 °C
Average: 33.1 °C
38.4 °C38.2 °C37.3 °C
34.4 °C35 °C32.8 °C
32.6 °C33 °C32.5 °C
Maximum: 38.4 °C
Average: 34.9 °C
Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.1 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.4 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.4 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.1 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.

3DMark Steel Nomad Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Apple iPad 11 (2025)
A16 GPU 4-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
90.8 %
Honor Pad V9
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
87.7 % -3%
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
86.9 % -4%
Apple iPad 10
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD
86.2 % -5%
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
77 % -15%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Apple iPad 11 (2025)
A16 GPU 4-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
90.7 %
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
89.4 % -1%
Apple iPad 10
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD
86.3 % -5%
Honor Pad V9
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
84.7 % -7%
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
83.8 % -8%
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Apple iPad 11 (2025)
A16 GPU 4-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
88.9 %
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
86.9 % -2%
Honor Pad V9
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
81.3 % -9%
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
98.6 %
Honor Pad V9
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
89 %
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
86.5 %
0510152025303540455055Tooltip
Apple iPad 11 (2025) A16 GPU 4-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 0.0.0.0: Ø14 (13.8-15.2)
Apple iPad 10 A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test: Ø11.8 (11.6-13.5)
Apple iPad 11 (2025) A16 GPU 4-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø52.5 (51.5-56.8)
Apple iPad 10 A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø42.4 (41.9-48.6)
Apple iPad 10 A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø43.4 (42.4-51.8)
Apple iPad 11 (2025) A16 GPU 4-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø9.48 (9.2-10.3)

发言人

立体声扬声器的低音轻盈、高音清晰，带来愉悦的音效体验。有线耳机可通过 USB 端口连接，蓝牙 5.3 支持无线连接，但音频编解码器很少。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2038.239.92532.5343121.931.44031.431.55033.538.56321.730.3802426.910017.837.312516.640.916019.754.72001956.825017.559.231516.259.440016.559.450012.368.163012.370.48001569.5100013.267125012.472.3160011.670.9200013.376.825001275.9315012.775.4400012.977.1500013.37763001373.4800013.173.91000013.566.31250013.665.61600013.458.3SPL25.486.1N0.765.9median 13.3median 68.1Delta1.77.437.539.526.327.423.723.535.926.13631.824.924.620.424.918.530.816.938.517.951.11652.914.154.212.258.113.358.310.965.812.364.512.168.312.567.511.869.511.971.612.474.212.87513.174.71376.313.275.813.670.413.670.513.759.41459.413.851.52584.60.658.9median 13.2median 65.81.68.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseApple iPad 11 (2025)Apple iPad 10
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Apple iPad 11 (2025) audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 30% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 20% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Apple iPad 10 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 43% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 37% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

电池使用时间 - iPad 2025 的电池容量略有增加


耗电量

与前代产品相比 iPad 10相比，电池功率略有增加，达到 28.93 瓦。不过，使用 小米 25000，电池需要近三个小时才能完全充满。耗电量明显高于Android 竞争对手，总体而言，略高于前代产品。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.12 / 0.17 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.43 / 7.16 / 7.2 Watt
Load midlight 11.23 / 15.03 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Apple iPad 11 (2025)
7698 mAh		Apple iPad 10
7606 mAh		Xiaomi Pad 7
8850 mAh		Honor Pad V9
10100 mAh		Average Apple A16 Bionic
 		Average of class Tablet
 
Power Consumption
8%
56%
12%
51%
18%
Idle Minimum *
1.43
1.34
6%
0.74
48%
1.26
12%
0.842 ?(0.56 - 1.43, n=5)
41%
1.766 ?(0.63 - 4.66, n=72, last 2 years)
-23%
Idle Average *
7.16
7.78
-9%
1.72
76%
5.57
22%
2.66 ?(1 - 7.16, n=5)
63%
3.76 ?(1 - 9.2, n=72, last 2 years)
47%
Idle Maximum *
7.2
7.89
-10%
1.74
76%
5.61
22%
2.71 ?(1.1 - 7.2, n=5)
62%
4.25 ?(1.3 - 15.3, n=72, last 2 years)
41%
Load Average *
11.23
9.05
19%
7.26
35%
12
-7%
5.76 ?(3.42 - 11.2, n=5)
49%
9.51 ?(2.5 - 34.9, n=72, last 2 years)
15%
Load Maximum *
15.03
9.98
34%
8.11
46%
13.36
11%
9.28 ?(5.56 - 15, n=5)
38%
13.3 ?(4.6 - 46.7, n=72, last 2 years)
12%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

0123456789101112131415Tooltip
Apple iPad 11 (2025) Apple A16 Bionic; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd; Geekbench 6.4: Ø6.25 (2.65-15.7)
Apple iPad 10 Apple A14 Bionic; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø7.3 (2.93-13.3)
Apple iPad 11 (2025) Apple A16 Bionic; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø2.87 (2.83-3.05)
Apple iPad 10 Apple A14 Bionic; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø3.05 (3.02-3.16)

Power consumption: GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

0123456789101112Tooltip
Apple iPad 11 (2025) Apple A16 Bionic; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø11.7 (10.6-12.3)
Apple iPad 10 Apple A14 Bionic; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø11.5 (10-12.6)
Apple iPad 11 (2025) Apple A16 Bionic; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø2.87 (2.83-3.05)
Apple iPad 10 Apple A14 Bionic; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø3.05 (3.02-3.16)

电池运行时间

在亮度为 150 cd/m² 的实际电池测试中，iPad 11 在 Wi-Fi 网络上冲浪时的续航时间为 10.5 小时。

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 135)
10h 33min
Battery Runtime - WiFi v1.3
Apple iPad 11 (2025)
7698 mAh
633 min
Apple iPad 10
7606 mAh
647 min
Xiaomi Pad 7
8850 mAh
1086 min
Honor Pad V9
10100 mAh
1074 min
OnePlus Pad 2
9510 mAh
866 min

Notebookcheck 总体评分

作为一款中端设备，iPad 11 提供了强大的功能，但在显示屏方面仍有很大的不足。

Apple iPad 11 (2025) - 04/23/2025 v8
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis
83 / 98 → 85%
Keyboard
69 / 80 → 86%
Pointing Device
89%
Connectivity
52 / 69 → 76%
Weight
84 / 40-88 → 91%
Battery
88%
Display
80%
Games Performance
35 / 65 → 54%
Application Performance
84 / 92 → 92%
AI Performance
94%
Temperature
92%
Noise
100%
Audio
79 / 91 → 86%
Camera
60 / 90 → 67%
Average
79%
84%
Tablet - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
87.4%
Materials
80%
Packaging
95%
Power Use
94.1%
Repairability
50%
Software Updates
83.5%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 81.7%

Possible alternatives compared

Image
Model / Review
Price
Weight
Drive
Display
1.
83.9%
Apple iPad 11 (2025)
Apple iPad 11 (2025)
Apple A16 Bionic ⎘
Apple A16 GPU 4-Core ⎘
6 GB Memory, 128 GB NVMe		Amazon:
1. $299.00
Apple iPad 11-inch: A16 chip...
2. $599.00
Apple iPad Air 11-inch with ...
3. $6.98
Ailun Screen Protector for i...
List Price: 399€		477 g128 GB NVMe10.86"
2360x1640
265 PPI
IPS
2.
88.6% v7 (old)
Apple iPad 10
Apple iPad 10
Apple A14 Bionic ⎘
Apple A14 Bionic GPU ⎘
4 GB Memory, 64 GB SSD		Amazon:
1. $299.00
Apple iPad 11-inch: A16 chip...
2. $20.79
Stylus Pen for iPad 2018-202...
3. $15.99
Metapen Pencil A8 for Apple ...
List Price: 579€		477 g64 GB SSD10.90"
2360x1640
264 PPI
IPS
3.
85.9%
Xiaomi Pad 7
Xiaomi Pad 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 732 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB 		Amazon:
1. $519.99
Xiaomi Pad 7 Ai WiFi Version...
2. $449.99
Xiaomi Pad 6 WiFi Version 11...
3. $37.99
Keyboard Case for Xiaomi Pad...
List Price: 400€		500 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash11.20"
3200x2136
344 PPI
LCD
4.
82.2%
Honor Pad V9
Honor Pad V9
MediaTek Dimensity 8350 ⎘
ARM Mali-G615 MP6 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB 		Amazon:
1. $12.95
Mr.Shield Screen Protector c...
2. $12.99
Vaxson 2-Pack Film Protector...
3. $11.90
Case Compatible for Honor Pa...
List Price: 500€		475 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash11.50"
2800x1840
291 PPI
IPS
5.
86.1%
OnePlus Pad 2
OnePlus Pad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 750 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB 		Amazon: $569.99
List Price: 549€		584 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash12.10"
3000x2120
304 PPI
IPS

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > Apple iPad 11 (2025) 评测--这款经济实惠的平板电脑在最重要的方面落后了
Marcus Herbrich, 2025-04-30 (Update: 2025-04-30)