Notebookcheck Logo

小米红米Pad评测--经济实惠的Android ,具有90Hz和4个扬声器的平板电脑

红米首次亮相。 通过红米Pad,小米推出了其第一款红米系列平板电脑。这表明,这款10.6英寸的设备以实惠的价格提供了良好的功能。虽然红米平板电脑在我们的审查中以90-Hz显示屏、光滑的金属结构和长电池寿命等特点而大放异彩,但我们也发现了一些不足之处。
Android Tablet Touchscreen
小米红米Pad

不同的设备级别,相同的目标:就像流行的红米智能手机系列一样,该系列由经济型和中档手机组成,往往能提供大量的价格,红米Pad也试图给你带来最大的收益。

小米红米Pad的起价约为240美元。这款10.6英寸的Android 12平板电脑配备了八核的 联发科Helio G99SoC和高达128GB的存储空间。附带的充电器能够以高达18瓦的功率为内部8000毫安的电池充电。虽然红米Pad在许多方面做得很好,但我们在审查中也发现了一些缺点。

Xiaomi Redmi Pad (Redmi Pad Series)
Processor
Mediatek Helio G99 8 x 2 - 2.2 GHz, Cortex-A76 / A55
Graphics adapter
Memory
4 GB 
, LPDDR4X
Display
10.61 inch 5:3, 2000 x 1200 pixel 220 PPI, capacitive, IPS, 400 Nits, glossy: yes, 90 Hz
Storage
128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 128 GB 
, 105.1 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: USB-C, Card Reader: microSD up to 1 TB, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Acceleration sensor, DRM Widevine L1, Camera2 API Full
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.3
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7.05 x 250.38 x 157.98
Battery
8000 mAh Lithium-Ion, 18W fast charging
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 12
Camera
Primary Camera: 8 MPix AF, video recording up to 1080p@30fps
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix FOV 105°, FocusFrame, video recording up to 1080p@30fps
Additional features
Speakers: Quad speakers with Dolby Atmos, Keyboard: virtual, 22.5W charger (10V/2.25A), USB cable, microSD slot eject tool, Quick start guide, Warranty information , MIUI 13, 24 Months Warranty, fanless
Weight
445 g, Power Supply: 65 g
Price
330 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
84.6 %
12/2022
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2
445 g7.05 mm10.61"2000x1200
88.5 %
10/2021
Apple iPad 2021
A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU
487 g7.5 mm10.20"2160x1620
80.9 %
04/2022
Huawei MatePad T10S
Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4
450 g7.85 mm10.10"1920x1200
81 %
02/2022
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
T618, Mali-G52 MP2
508 g6.9 mm10.50"1920x1200
80.5 %
03/2022
Teclast T40 Pro
T618, Mali-G52 MP2
480 g9.2 mm10.36"2000x1200
87.6 %
12/2021
Xiaomi Pad 5
SD 860, Adreno 640
511 g6.85 mm11.00"2560x1600

机箱 - 轻量级铝制一体成型机箱

尽管红米系列由更多面向预算的智能手机和平板电脑组成,但这并不一定意味着用户在材料或制造质量方面将不得不做出重大妥协。同样,红米Pad也不符合刻板的廉价设备原型。

扁平的金属外壳高度为7.05毫米,除了看起来相当结实外,还留下了优质的视觉和触觉印象。虽然外壳可以从较短的边缘轻微扭曲,但其刚性足以满足日常使用。然而,这款平板电脑并没有IP认证。

红米Pad的重量为445克,相当轻,比我们比较的所有具有类似尺寸的竞争对手都要轻,包括 Apple iPad 2021三星Galaxy Tab A8 2022.

小米提供三种颜色的变体。用户可以选择灰色(石墨灰),银色(月光银),以及浅绿色(薄荷绿)。

小米红米Pad
小米红米Pad
小米红米Pad
小米红米Pad
小米红米Pad
小米红米Pad
小米红米Pad
小米红米Pad
小米红米Pad
小米红米Pad
小米红米Pad
小米红米Pad

尺寸比较

254.69 mm 166.25 mm 6.85 mm 511 g250.6 mm 174.1 mm 7.5 mm 487 g250.38 mm 157.98 mm 7.05 mm 445 g248 mm 157 mm 9.2 mm 480 g246.8 mm 161.9 mm 6.9 mm 508 g240.2 mm 159 mm 7.85 mm 450 g210 mm 148 mm 1 mm 2.9 g

连接性 - 3种内存配置

小米红米Pad有三种不同的配置。在撰写本文时,该平板电脑的价格约为240美元,配备3GB LPDDR4X内存和64GB UFS-2.2存储。4/128GB和6/128GB机型的价格分别约为250美元和280美元。内部存储可以通过以exFAT格式化的microSD卡扩展,容量可达1TB。

另外一个8/128-GB的配置目前在中国市场上独家提供。它是否会进入其他地区,目前还不确定。

红米Pad使用USB-C 2.0接口进行充电和数据传输。由于缺乏3.5毫米耳机插孔,支持USB-OTG的端口也可作为音频输出。红米Pad通过其四扬声器产生杜比全景声,这些扬声器成对地占据了设备的短边。

左边:电源按钮,2个扬声器
左边:电源按钮,2个扬声器
对。扬声器,USB-C 2.0,扬声器
对。扬声器,USB-C 2.0,扬声器
顶部:microSD卡插槽,麦克风,音量摇杆
顶部:microSD卡插槽,麦克风,音量摇杆
底部。没有连接
底部。没有连接

微型SD卡读卡器

红米Tab的microSD读卡器与我们参考的Angelbird AV Pro V60存储卡一起使用时只能达到平均速度。

虽然连续读取和写入速度分别为66.1MB/s和35.8MB/s,是一个体面的,但特别是在读取操作期间,性能反复出现下滑。此外,在我们的复制测试中,小米平板电脑的速度非常慢,只有9.48MB/s。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
49.18 MB/s +419%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
18.12 MB/s +91%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird V60)
17.9 MB/s +89%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
9.48 MB/s

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø35.8 (6.67-45.8)
Huawei MatePad T10S Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø40.5 (23.8-57.4)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø32.7 (13.3-40.3)
Teclast T40 Pro Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø34.1 (16.3-45.8)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø66.1 (7.54-78.5)
Huawei MatePad T10S Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø76.1 (44.6-84.2)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø74.6 (37.9-86.8)
Teclast T40 Pro Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø78.1 (47.9-85.6)

软件 -Android 12和MIUI 13用于小米红米Pad

红米Pad运行Android 12,带有小米自己的MIUI用户界面13.1版本。制造商在额外的软件方面没有包括很多。除了谷歌应用程序和小米工具的小集合,只有两个第三方应用程序WPS Office和Netflix--这两个都可以删除--预装了。由于支持DRM Widevine L1,这款平板电脑可以用来流传高清质量的内容。

MIUI 13不仅允许应用程序在全屏模式下运行,而且还允许在窗口视图中同时打开多个应用程序。此外,两个应用程序窗口可以自动对齐,各占一半的屏幕。然而,使用这一功能需要4GB版本的平板电脑(或更高版本),因为3GB型号不支持分割视图。

在测试时(12月初),红米平板电脑的Android 安全补丁可以追溯到01.09.22,使它们相当过时。根据小米公司的说法,操作系统更新和安全补丁没有官方支持窗口。

小米红米Pad
小米红米Pad
小米红米Pad
小米红米Pad
小米红米Pad
小米红米Pad

通信和GNSS - 蓝牙5.3和WiFi 5

凭借蓝牙5.3和Wi-Fi 5,小米红米Pad只支持两个通信渠道,因为NFC和WWAN选项都没有。也没有GPS模块。

结合我们的华硕ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000参考路由器,小米达到了非常稳定的Wi-Fi传输速度,接近Wi-Fi 5的极限,最高可达369 Mb/s。初始传输速度低是由路由器 "唤醒 "造成的。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Xiaomi Pad 5
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
635 (320min - 652max) MBit/s
Apple iPad 2021
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
587 (290min - 624max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Xiaomi Pad 5
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
538 (317min - 618max) MBit/s
Apple iPad 2021
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
485 (191min - 554max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
367 (358min - 370max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
325 (163min - 328max) MBit/s -11%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
322 (315min - 326max) MBit/s -12%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
203 (158min - 227max) MBit/s -45%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
369 (179min - 379max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
349 (178min - 357max) MBit/s -5%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
346 (335min - 360max) MBit/s -6%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
239 (202min - 259max) MBit/s -35%
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340360Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mediatek Helio G99, ARM Mali-G57 MP2; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø367 (358-370)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 UNISOC T618, ARM Mali-G52 MP2; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø319 (163-328)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mediatek Helio G99, ARM Mali-G57 MP2; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø363 (179-379)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 UNISOC T618, ARM Mali-G52 MP2; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø343 (178-357)

摄像机 - 团体视频聊天的特殊功能

用自拍相机拍摄的照片
用自拍相机拍摄的照片

小米红米Pad在平板电脑的最长边上有一个800万像素的自拍摄像头。它覆盖了105°的视野,以每秒30帧的速度拍摄高达1080p的视频,并配有FocusFrame功能,这应该是为了加强团体视频通话。

FocusFrame的工作原理类似于Apple's Center Stage。在视频通话过程中,红米Tab的自拍相机会自动检测所有当前参与者,并保持他们的焦点,即使他们在移动。然而,目前只支持少数几个应用程序。据小米称,FocusFrame可用于Facebook Messenger、微信和WhatsApp。

主摄像头的分辨率为800万像素,还支持高达1080p、30FPS的视频录制。与自拍相机一样,在良好的照明条件下,它以良好的视频质量闪亮登场,在低光照条件下,由于明显的图像噪音,它受到了很大的冲击。图片的情况也是如此。

在良好的环境光线下,主摄像头可以拍摄出色彩自然、对比度良好的照片。由于图像缺乏细节,放大是不可取的。与自拍相机一样,主摄像头在低光照情况下也不太适合。

用主摄像头拍摄的照片
用主摄像头拍摄的照片
用主摄像头拍摄的照片
用主摄像头拍摄的照片
用主摄像头拍摄的照片
用主摄像头拍摄的照片

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Tageslicht-Aufnahme 1Tageslicht-Aufnahme 25-facher ZoomLowlight-Aufnahme
click to load images

在我们测试实验室的理想条件下,主摄像头显示自己非常准确(最大deltaE为8.64)。在恶劣的照明条件下,我们用1勒克斯的场景来模拟,这不再是真的。这时,色彩准确性大大偏离了它的理想范围,以前清晰可见的测试图在黑暗中几乎完全消失了。

ColorChecker
5.4 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi Pad: 5.41 ∆E min: 3.07 - max: 8.64 ∆E
ColorChecker
30 ∆E
54.9 ∆E
40.2 ∆E
35.3 ∆E
46.1 ∆E
62.4 ∆E
53.7 ∆E
36.5 ∆E
44.6 ∆E
29.4 ∆E
64.9 ∆E
63.9 ∆E
31.9 ∆E
47.5 ∆E
38.2 ∆E
76.6 ∆E
45 ∆E
42.5 ∆E
93.7 ∆E
71.4 ∆E
52.5 ∆E
37.5 ∆E
24.4 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi Pad: 47.37 ∆E min: 13.91 - max: 93.7 ∆E

配件和保修 - 包括22.5瓦的充电器

小米包括一个22.5瓦的充电器,一条USB线(type-A-type-C),一个从插槽中弹出microSD卡的工具,一份快速启动指南,以及一张随Redmi Tab而来的保修卡。制造商没有提供专门为该平板电脑制作的配件。

由于在美国没有小米红米平板电脑的官方保修信息,买家应了解个别零售商的条件和 我们的保修常见问题.

输入设备和处理 - 90-Hz und 2D面部识别

由于90-Hz的显示屏和8核的 联发科Helio G99SoC,小米红米Pad在使用过程中感觉反应非常灵敏和流畅。即使是要求较高的应用程序的运行通常也没有任何问题,其性能足以同时打开多个应用程序。应该注意的是,这适用于我们的测试模型,有4GB的内存。相比之下,3GB版本可能偶尔会出现卡顿。

由于没有指纹传感器,2D面部识别是唯一可用的生物识别认证选项。虽然人脸解锁的工作没有任何障碍,而且解锁红米平板电脑没有任何明显的延迟,但由于其基于软件的性质,它的安全性不如密码或图案解锁。该平板电脑也可以用蓝牙设备解锁,但这只适用于某些小米智能手表和智能手环。

键盘横向模式
键盘横向模式
键盘纵向模式
键盘纵向模式

显示器 - IPS屏幕,400尼特

子像素阵列
子像素阵列

红米Pad的10.6英寸屏幕的原始分辨率为2000 x 1200像素,长宽比为15:9,像素密度为220PPI。IPS面板的标称亮度为400尼特,不使用脉宽调制,使该平板电脑有可能成为敏感用户的好选择。正如我们用显微镜进行的慢动作观察所显示的那样,时空抖动也是不存在的。

当显示纯白色图像(APL50)时,显示屏的平均亮度达到401.6尼特。当用较小的图像(APL18)重复这一测试时,这一数值增加到414尼特。在禁用环境光传感器的情况下,可以达到418尼特的最高亮度。我们在最低亮度设置下测得1.54尼特。

390
cd/m²
408
cd/m²
415
cd/m²
376
cd/m²
418
cd/m²
419
cd/m²
381
cd/m²
392
cd/m²
415
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 419 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 401.6 cd/m² Minimum: 1.54 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 418 cd/m²
Contrast: 1493:1 (Black: 0.28 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.3 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 3.7 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
96.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.21
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
IPS, 2000x1200, 10.61
Apple iPad 2021
IPS, 2160x1620, 10.20
Huawei MatePad T10S
LCD IPS, 1920x1200, 10.10
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
TFT-LCD, 1920x1200, 10.50
Teclast T40 Pro
IPS, 2000x1200, 10.36
Xiaomi Pad 5
IPS, 2560x1600, 11.00
Screen
3%
-29%
-78%
-24%
-22%
Brightness middle
418
507
21%
285
-32%
368
-12%
433
4%
491
17%
Brightness
402
491
22%
282
-30%
346
-14%
412
2%
473
18%
Brightness Distribution
90
90
0%
91
1%
91
1%
86
-4%
91
1%
Black Level *
0.28
0.5
-79%
0.3
-7%
0.61
-118%
0.48
-71%
0.87
-211%
Contrast
1493
1014
-32%
950
-36%
603
-60%
902
-40%
564
-62%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.3
1.7
26%
3.53
-53%
6.9
-200%
3
-30%
1.9
17%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
5.4
3.9
28%
5.84
-8%
11.4
-111%
7.2
-33%
4.1
24%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
3.7
2.4
35%
6.2
-68%
7.7
-108%
4.4
-19%
3
19%
Gamma
2.21 100%
2.25 98%
2.044 108%
2.16 102%
2.12 104%
2.21 100%
CCT
6595 99%
6923 94%
8130 80%
8547 76%
7003 93%
7182 91%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

IPS显示器的颜色可以通过在三种颜色预设中选择鲜艳饱和标准来调整。此外,色温可以通过色轮或三种预设之一来改变(标准温暖)。

标准颜色和色温设置提供最准确的结果。通过这些设置,屏幕可以实现良好的对比度、黑值和色温。对于日常使用来说,色彩准确性也是绰绰有余的。

色彩准确度(颜色配置文件标准,色温标准,目标色彩空间sRGB)
色彩准确度(颜色配置文件标准,色温标准,目标色彩空间sRGB)
色彩空间(色彩配置文件标准,色温标准,目标色彩空间sRGB)。
色彩空间(色彩配置文件标准,色温标准,目标色彩空间sRGB)。
灰度(色彩配置文件标准,色温标准,目标色彩空间sRGB)。
灰度(色彩配置文件标准,色温标准,目标色彩空间sRGB)。
色彩饱和度(色彩配置文件标准,色温标准,目标色彩空间sRGB)。
色彩饱和度(色彩配置文件标准,色温标准,目标色彩空间sRGB)。

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
22.89 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 10.42 ms rise
↘ 12.47 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 45 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
38.13 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 17.15 ms rise
↘ 20.98 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 52 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

凭借良好的视角,小米红米Pad的IPS面板在户外使用时表现良好,只要环境光线条件不是太亮。由于最大亮度有点低,在阳光直射下,显示屏的可读性很快就会变差,因此,移动到阴凉处几乎是必要的。

户外使用
户外使用
户外使用
户外使用
视角
视角

性能 - 搭载联发科Helio G99的红米Pad

随着 联发科Helio G992022年8月推出,小米红米Pad是基于中端ARM SoC的。这款6纳米的八核处理器依靠两个ARM Cortex-A76内核,其时钟速度高达2.2GHz,用于执行苛刻的任务,还有一个由六个高能效的Cortex-A55内核组成的集群,时钟速度高达2GHz。GPU是一个 ARM Mali-G57 MP2.

在我们的合成基准测试中,红米Pad的定位领先于许多同等价位的平板电脑。就性能而言,我们的测试设备介于 红米T40 Pro(UNISOC T618)和其内部竞争者 小米Pad 5,其性能明显更快,这要归功于其 骁龙 860SoC。小米5 Apple iPad 2021具有更好的性能,击败了其所有的Android 替代品。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Apple iPad 2021
1328 Points +138%
Xiaomi Pad 5
784 Points +41%
Average of class Tablet (140 - 1892, n=68, last 2 years)
664 Points +19%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
558 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (490 - 576, n=14)
546 Points -2%
Teclast T40 Pro
380 Points -32%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
365 Points -35%
Huawei MatePad T10S
296 Points -47%
Multi-Core
Apple iPad 2021
3235 Points +71%
Xiaomi Pad 5
2768 Points +47%
Average of class Tablet (312 - 8524, n=68, last 2 years)
2362 Points +25%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
1889 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (1670 - 1981, n=14)
1834 Points -3%
Teclast T40 Pro
1303 Points -31%
Huawei MatePad T10S
1256 Points -34%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
1229 Points -35%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Apple iPad 2021
622382 Points +97%
Xiaomi Pad 5
575553 Points +82%
Average of class Tablet (92766 - 1416727, n=52, last 2 years)
453858 Points +44%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
316212 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (229468 - 337968, n=6)
306552 Points -3%
Teclast T40 Pro
240502 Points -24%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
201310 Points -36%
Huawei MatePad T10S
182567 Points -42%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Xiaomi Pad 5
11318 Points +19%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (8973 - 11027, n=14)
9786 Points +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
9475 Points
Average of class Tablet (3195 - 17267, n=65, last 2 years)
8736 Points -8%
Teclast T40 Pro
8364 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
7447 Points -21%
Huawei MatePad T10S
6622 Points -30%
CrossMark - Overall
Apple iPad 2021
842 Points +46%
Average of class Tablet (172 - 1585, n=51, last 2 years)
672 Points +17%
Xiaomi Pad 5
635 Points +10%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
575 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (526 - 602, n=8)
568 Points -1%
Teclast T40 Pro
384 Points -33%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
361 Points -37%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Xiaomi Pad 5
5154 Points +72%
Average of class Tablet (444 - 8886, n=52, last 2 years)
3631 Points +22%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (2855 - 3120, n=8)
3023 Points +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
2988 Points
Teclast T40 Pro
2145 Points -28%
Huawei MatePad T10S
2013 Points -33%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
1839 Points -38%
Apple iPad 2021
Points -100%
System
Xiaomi Pad 5
8805 Points +35%
Average of class Tablet (1103 - 14097, n=52, last 2 years)
6543 Points +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
6509 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (5261 - 6776, n=8)
6309 Points -3%
Teclast T40 Pro
4863 Points -25%
Huawei MatePad T10S
4845 Points -26%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
4729 Points -27%
Memory
Xiaomi Pad 5
5788 Points +63%
Average of class Tablet (916 - 8890, n=52, last 2 years)
4284 Points +21%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (3454 - 4152, n=8)
3739 Points +5%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
3550 Points
Huawei MatePad T10S
2896 Points -18%
Teclast T40 Pro
1608 Points -55%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
970 Points -73%
Graphics
Xiaomi Pad 5
10293 Points +258%
Average of class Tablet (580 - 31738, n=52, last 2 years)
6639 Points +131%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
2875 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (2683 - 3002, n=8)
2819 Points -2%
Teclast T40 Pro
2063 Points -28%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
2001 Points -30%
Huawei MatePad T10S
1452 Points -49%
Web
Xiaomi Pad 5
1346 Points +12%
Teclast T40 Pro
1313 Points +9%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (1201 - 1325, n=8)
1265 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
1246 Points +4%
Average of class Tablet (10 - 1907, n=52, last 2 years)
1205 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
1201 Points
Huawei MatePad T10S
956 Points -20%
AImark - Score v2.x
Xiaomi Pad 5
46413 Points +939%
Average of class Tablet (4468 - 6865, n=6, last 2 years)
5427 Points +21%
Teclast T40 Pro
4695 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
4659 Points +4%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
4468 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G99 ()
4468 Points 0%
Huawei MatePad T10S
4455 Points 0%
Apple iPad 2021
Points -100%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
9213 Points
Average of class Tablet (1662 - 44323, n=49, last 2 years)
8899 Points -3%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (6323 - 9695, n=7)
8508 Points -8%
VRMark - Amber Room
Average of class Tablet (1183 - 8816, n=4, last 2 years)
3565 Score +23%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
2909 Score
Average Mediatek Helio G99 ()
2909 Score 0%

Legend

 
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mediatek Helio G99, ARM Mali-G57 MP2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
 
Apple iPad 2021 Apple A13 Bionic, Apple A13 Bionic GPU, 64 GB SSD
 
Huawei MatePad T10S HiSilicon Kirin 710A, ARM Mali-G51 MP4, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 UNISOC T618, ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Teclast T40 Pro UNISOC T618, ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 128 GB eMMC Flash
 
Xiaomi Pad 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Qualcomm Adreno 640, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

同样,与竞争对手相比,小米红米Pad在图形基准测试中的表现也很一般。这两款 小米Pad 5Apple iPad 2021仍然能够以明显的优势超过它。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Wild Life Score | 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited | 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 | 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal: offscreen Overall Score
Basemark GPU 1.2: Vulkan Medium Native | 1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen | OpenGL Medium Native | 1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Apple iPad 2021
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
1872 Points +469%
Xiaomi Pad 5
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
970 Points +195%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
329 Points
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
180 Points -45%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
179 Points -46%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
152 Points -54%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Apple iPad 2021
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
1992 Points +481%
Xiaomi Pad 5
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
985 Points +187%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
343 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
184 Points -46%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
182 Points -47%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
153 Points -55%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Apple iPad 2021
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
7858 Points +547%
Xiaomi Pad 5
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3436 Points +183%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1215 Points
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
709 Points -42%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
708 Points -42%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
564 Points -54%
3DMark / Wild Life Score
Apple iPad 2021
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
7457 Points +503%
Xiaomi Pad 5
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3428 Points +177%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1237 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
712 Points -42%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
709 Points -43%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
557 Points -55%
3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited
Xiaomi Pad 5
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8661 Points +129%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3780 Points
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
2158 Points -43%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
2105 Points -44%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1501 Points -60%
Apple iPad 2021
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
Points -100%
3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics
Xiaomi Pad 5
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
12007 Points +215%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3809 Points
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
2002 Points -47%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1957 Points -49%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1356 Points -64%
Apple iPad 2021
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
Points -100%
3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi Pad 5
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4385 Points +19%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3683 Points
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
2969 Points -19%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
2862 Points -22%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2441 Points -34%
Apple iPad 2021
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
Points -100%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Xiaomi Pad 5
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6981 Points +164%
Apple iPad 2021
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
5362 Points +103%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2644 Points
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1526 Points -42%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1463 Points -45%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1124 Points -57%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Apple iPad 2021
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
9773 Points +300%
Xiaomi Pad 5
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8202 Points +236%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2442 Points
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1338 Points -45%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1284 Points -47%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
981 Points -60%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi Pad 5
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4590 Points +23%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3717 Points
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
3007 Points -19%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
2865 Points -23%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2365 Points -36%
Apple iPad 2021
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
2078 Points -44%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited
Xiaomi Pad 5
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5000 Points +104%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2452 Points
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1518 Points -38%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1488 Points -39%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1059 Points -57%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics
Xiaomi Pad 5
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6876 Points +191%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2360 Points
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1361 Points -42%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1340 Points -43%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
954 Points -60%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2841 Points
Xiaomi Pad 5
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2558 Points -10%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
2541 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
2422 Points -15%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
230 Points -92%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2583 Points
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1456 Points -44%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1425 Points -45%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1085 Points -58%
Xiaomi Pad 5
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points -100%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2412 Points
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1281 Points -47%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1252 Points -48%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
955 Points -60%
Xiaomi Pad 5
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points -100%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3439 Points
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
2783 Points -19%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
2768 Points -20%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2236 Points -35%
Xiaomi Pad 5
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points -100%
3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3473 Points
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
2140 Points -38%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
2084 Points -40%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1445 Points -58%
Xiaomi Pad 5
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points -100%
3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3482 Points
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1998 Points -43%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1958 Points -44%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1333 Points -62%
Xiaomi Pad 5
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points -100%
3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3441 Points
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
2850 Points -17%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
2692 Points -22%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2256 Points -34%
Xiaomi Pad 5
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points -100%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi Pad 5
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
112 fps +104%
Apple iPad 2021
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
60 fps +9%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
55 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
39 fps -29%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
39 fps -29%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
38 fps -31%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Apple iPad 2021
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
307 fps +387%
Xiaomi Pad 5
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
184 fps +192%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
63 fps
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
41 fps -35%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
41 fps -35%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
41 fps -35%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi Pad 5
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
65 fps +86%
Apple iPad 2021
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
60 fps +71%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
35 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
25 fps -29%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
25 fps -29%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
20 fps -43%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Apple iPad 2021
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
167 fps +318%
Xiaomi Pad 5
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
109 fps +173%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
40 fps
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
28 fps -30%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
26 fps -35%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
26 fps -35%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Apple iPad 2021
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
57 fps +148%
Xiaomi Pad 5
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
40 fps +74%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
23 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
15 fps -35%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
15 fps -35%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
14 fps -39%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Apple iPad 2021
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
110 fps +340%
Xiaomi Pad 5
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
78 fps +212%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
25 fps
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
16 fps -36%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
15 fps -40%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
15 fps -40%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Apple iPad 2021
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
43 fps +231%
Xiaomi Pad 5
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
25 fps +92%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
13 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
9.2 fps -29%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
8.5 fps -35%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
8.1 fps -38%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Apple iPad 2021
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
69 fps +360%
Xiaomi Pad 5
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
47 fps +213%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
15 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
9.7 fps -35%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
9.1 fps -39%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
8.7 fps -42%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Apple iPad 2021
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
35 fps +317%
Xiaomi Pad 5
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
17 fps +102%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
8.4 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
6 fps -29%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
6 fps -29%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
4.8 fps -43%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Apple iPad 2021
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
31 fps +474%
Xiaomi Pad 5
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
18 fps +233%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.4 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
3.6 fps -33%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
3.6 fps -33%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2.9 fps -46%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Apple iPad 2021
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
50 fps +317%
Xiaomi Pad 5
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
26 fps +117%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
12 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
9.9 fps -17%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
9.9 fps -17%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
7.6 fps -37%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Apple iPad 2021
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
82 fps +486%
Xiaomi Pad 5
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
47 fps +236%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
14 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
10 fps -29%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
10 fps -29%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
4.3 fps -69%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal / Overall Score
Apple iPad 2021
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
2965 Points +223%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
917 Points
Basemark GPU 1.2 / Vulkan Medium Native
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
24.45 fps
Basemark GPU 1.2 / Vulkan Medium Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
26.11 fps
Basemark GPU 1.2 / OpenGL Medium Native
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
23.79 fps
Basemark GPU 1.2 / OpenGL Medium Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
26.81 fps

小米红米Pad是浏览网页的绝佳选择,甚至能够快速加载复杂的网站。不管怎么说,它的排名低于 小米Pad 5在我们的浏览器基准中排名较低。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPad 2021 (Safari 15)
142.2 Points +155%
Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 236, n=59, last 2 years)
84.9 Points +52%
Xiaomi Pad 5 (Chrome 96.0.4664.45)
73 Points +31%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (46.9 - 74.2, n=7)
62.5 Points +12%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad (Chrome 107.0.5304.105)
55.842 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
43.98 Points -21%
Huawei MatePad T10S (Huawei V12)
30.25 Points -46%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPad 2021 (Safari 15)
291.1 Points +222%
Xiaomi Pad 5 (Chrome 96.0.4664.45)
128.1 Points +42%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 ()
90.4 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad (Chrome 107.0.5304.105)
90.377 Points
Average of class Tablet (57.3 - 135.7, n=5, last 2 years)
85.4 Points -6%
Teclast T40 Pro (Chrome 98)
75.3 Points -17%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
66.5 Points -26%
Huawei MatePad T10S (Huawei V12)
48.12 Points -47%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Average of class Tablet (21 - 227, n=57, last 2 years)
85.7 Points +53%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (39 - 81, n=7)
64.3 Points +15%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad (Chrome 107.0.5304.105)
56 Points
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Apple iPad 2021 (Safari 15)
202 Points +140%
Average of class Tablet (34 - 342, n=42, last 2 years)
120.7 Points +44%
Xiaomi Pad 5 (Chrome 96.0.4664.45)
96 Points +14%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (80 - 112, n=6)
91.8 Points +9%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad (Chrome 107.0.5304.105)
84 Points
Teclast T40 Pro (Chrome 98)
76 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
75 Points -11%
Huawei MatePad T10S (Huawei V12)
55 Points -35%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPad 2021 (Safari 15)
171 runs/min +349%
Average of class Tablet (14.7 - 376, n=52, last 2 years)
77.2 runs/min +103%
Xiaomi Pad 5 (Chrome 96.0.4664.45)
61.3 runs/min +61%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (24.1 - 65.5, n=7)
45.8 runs/min +20%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad (Chrome 107.0.5304.105)
38.1 runs/min
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
33.35 runs/min -12%
Huawei MatePad T10S (Huawei V12)
25.64 runs/min -33%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPad 2021 (Safari 15)
47288 Points +169%
Xiaomi Pad 5 (Chrome 96.0.4664.45)
28456 Points +62%
Average of class Tablet (2672 - 74614, n=72, last 2 years)
23028 Points +31%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (17228 - 25005, n=14)
20523 Points +17%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad (Chrome 107.0.5304.105)
17557 Points
Teclast T40 Pro (Chrome 98)
14722 Points -16%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
10787 Points -39%
Huawei MatePad T10S (Huawei V12)
9996 Points -43%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Huawei MatePad T10S (Huawei V12)
4122 ms * -69%
Average of class Tablet (451 - 34733, n=59, last 2 years)
3209 ms * -31%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
3060 ms * -25%
Teclast T40 Pro (Chrome 98)
2762 ms * -13%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad (Chrome 107.0.5304.105)
2443.7 ms *
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (1922 - 2444, n=7)
2145 ms * +12%
Xiaomi Pad 5 (Chrome 96.0.4664.45)
1603 ms * +34%
Apple iPad 2021 (Safari 15)
545 ms * +78%

* ... smaller is better

红米Tab内的UFS-2.2存储允许短的加载时间和高于其价格类别的平均速度。甚至小米Pad 5也无法在整体上跟上它,尽管它实现了明显更快的连续读取速度。

Xiaomi Redmi PadHuawei MatePad T10SSamsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022Teclast T40 ProXiaomi Pad 5Average 128 GB UFS 2.2 FlashAverage of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5
-79%
-79%
-70%
-12%
-31%
-32%
Sequential Read 256KB
976.9
302.9
-69%
255.1
-74%
260.9
-73%
1459
49%
Sequential Write 256KB
883.6
99
-89%
101.1
-89%
199.2
-77%
534
-40%
Random Read 4KB
250.82
51.1
-80%
68.3
-73%
94.2
-62%
208.7
-17%
Random Write 4KB
257.02
57.8
-78%
57.5
-78%
83.6
-67%
158.9
-38%
182.5 ?(68.8 - 419, n=61)
-29%

游戏--即使在高要求的游戏中也能达到30FPS

集成的 的ARM Mali-G57 MP2的图形解决方案。 联发科Helio G99足以流畅地玩所有当前的游戏。也就是说,由于集成GPU的性能储备有限,在很多游戏中不太可能达到90-FPS的最大值。在我们的测试中,ArmajetSubway Surfers都一直以接近60FPS的速度运行。在其最大的可用HD/高设置下,PUBG Mobile被限制在30 FPS。

我们使用Gamebench来确定帧率。

PUBG手机版
PUBG手机版
氩氦刀
氩氦刀
地铁冲浪者
地铁冲浪者
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Pad; Armajet; 1.61.6: Ø58.4 (52-61)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad; PUBG Mobile; 2.3.0: Ø29.8 (27-31)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad; Subway Surfers; 3.4.0: Ø60.1 (50-61)

排放 - 四个带杜比全景声的扬声器

温度

小米红米Pad在使用过程中始终保持低温。即使经过一小时的压力测试,我们在平板电脑的表面也只测量到30.2℃,使其不至于温热。正如我们的3DMark Wild Life压力测试所显示的,联发科Helio G99的核心温度仍然相当低,没有大的节流现象。

最好的和最差的3DMark Wild Life Extreme运行只相差2%(345分和338分)。即使在最坏的基准情况下,性能水平也不会下降到98%以下。因此,在日常使用中,明显的性能下降基本上是不可能的。

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

0510152025303540Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.45 (7.39-7.47)
Apple iPad 2021 A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø39.5 (38.7-44.5)
Huawei MatePad T10S Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø3.34 (3.33-3.35)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø4.26 (4.25-4.27)
Teclast T40 Pro Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø4.27 (4.26-4.29)
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø20.5 (20.3-20.6)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø2.05 (2.03-2.07)
Apple iPad 2021 A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test: Ø10.7 (10.6-12.2)
Huawei MatePad T10S Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.7.2: Ø0.92 (0.907-0.927)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.7.2: Ø1.096 (1.091-1.101)
Teclast T40 Pro Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.8.1: Ø1.097 (1.093-1.102)
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.5.1: Ø5.86 (5.85-5.89)
Teclast T40 Pro Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø4.25 (4.24-4.25)
Max. Load
 29 °C28.7 °C27.4 °C 
 30.2 °C27.9 °C27.8 °C 
 30 °C27.9 °C27.4 °C 
Maximum: 30.2 °C
Average: 28.5 °C
27.4 °C28.1 °C28.5 °C
26.6 °C26.9 °C28.3 °C
26.3 °C27.3 °C27.7 °C
Maximum: 28.5 °C
Average: 27.5 °C
Power Supply (max.)  29.1 °C | Room Temperature 21.1 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 28.5 °C / 83 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 30.2 °C / 86 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 28.5 °C / 83 F, compared to the average of 33.3 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.9 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
小米红米Pad
小米红米Pad

发言人

虽然红米Pad的四扬声器能产生体面的环绕声,但对中音和高音的过度强调使音频体验无法达到丰富和平衡。杜比全景声在默认情况下是启用的,可以通过Android ,以及动态、视频、音乐和语音四个声音预设来调整。

外部音频设备可以通过USB-C或蓝牙5.3连接到平板电脑。支持流行的蓝牙编解码器,如AAC、LDAC、aptX和aptX HD。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.538.52526.323.53123.725.14035.925.5503637.16324.9248020.424.110018.53212516.941.116017.955.12001654.525014.159.231512.259.940013.360.150010.967.463012.371.780012.176.9100012.578.9125011.877.4160011.976.6200012.475.9250012.875.8315013.168.840001365.1500013.266630013.667.8800013.670.61000013.769.3125001466.31600013.853.8SPL2586N0.663.7median 13.2median 67.4Delta1.66.831.837.62422.816.123.727.625.232.337.623.430.22236.62239.52146.317.954.813.355.915.259.813.260.911.563.212.269.912.372.113.372.114.571.212.274.711.27211.770.212.168.512.767.213.672.313.17613.677.313.170.713.661.213.655.113.560.72584.40.663.1median 13.3median 68.51.36.1hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Redmi PadXiaomi Pad 5
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 27% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 23%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 21% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi Pad 5 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 21% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 77% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 23%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 13% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

能源管理--高效电源和大型电池

能源消耗

我们对红米Pad非常低的能源消耗感到惊喜。虽然竞争者,如 华为MatePad T10S在某些负载下甚至可以更经济,但小米平板电脑总体上是最高效的模型。

红米平板电脑的内部8000毫安时电池可以用附带的22.5瓦充电器进行充电。然而,这款平板电脑的最大充电功率限制在18瓦。为空电池完全充电,我们花了2:37小时。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.03 / 0.17 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.93 / 4.02 / 4.07 Watt
Load midlight 5.52 / 6.89 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
8000 mAh
Apple iPad 2021
8686 mAh
Huawei MatePad T10S
5100 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
7040 mAh
Teclast T40 Pro
7000 mAh
Xiaomi Pad 5
8720 mAh
Power Consumption
-71%
-28%
-25%
-21%
-22%
Idle Minimum *
0.93
1.3
-40%
1.6
-72%
1.19
-28%
1.44
-55%
0.99
-6%
Idle Average *
4.02
7.5
-87%
2.8
30%
4.63
-15%
3.87
4%
4.2
-4%
Idle Maximum *
4.07
7.58
-86%
3.5
14%
4.68
-15%
3.91
4%
4.22
-4%
Load Average *
5.52
10.03
-82%
7.9
-43%
7.27
-32%
7.1
-29%
7.88
-43%
Load Maximum *
6.89
10.91
-58%
11.5
-67%
9.17
-33%
8.88
-29%
10.63
-54%

* ... smaller is better

Consumption: Geekbench (150 nits)