Notebookcheck

Honor 50智能手机的回顾。没有华为就有谷歌

5G也在其中。 华为的子公司Honor ,也受到了针对该公司的限制。现在,它在市场上独立运作,Honor 50可以用谷歌服务和5G发货。我们的评论显示了这款Android 智能手机除此之外还能提供什么。
Mike Wobker, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
5G Android Smartphone Touchscreen
Honor 50

围绕着Honor ,事情已经平静了相当长的一段时间,这就是为什么我们最后一次Honor 的评论,即 Honor 10X Lite是在一年多以前。我们数据库中最后一款高端Honor 智能手机是 Honor 20.该制造商现在正以Honor 50重新开始,在与华为分离后,除了谷歌服务外,还使用现代5G SoC。

Honor 50配备了一个 高通骁龙778G 5G与集成的 Adreno 642L图形以及8GB的内存和256GB的内部存储。这款Android 智能手机的售价约为600欧元。

, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 
Honor 50 (50 Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G 8 x 1.8 - 2.4 GHz, Kryo 670 (Cortex-A78/A55)
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 642L
Memory
8192 MB 
Display
6.57 inch 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixel 392 PPI, Capacitive, OLED, glossy: yes, 120 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 256 GB 
, 235 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyroscope, proximity, compass
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.2, 2G GSM (900/1800 MHz), 3G UMTS WCDMA (900/2100 MHz), 4G LTE (B1/B3/B7/B8/B20/B28/B34/B38/B40), 5G (n1/n3/n7/n8/n28/n38/n40/n41/n77/n78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7.78 x 159.96 x 73.76
Battery
4300 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 11
Camera
Primary Camera: 108 MPix (f/1.9, 1/1.52", 0.7µm) + 8MP (ultra-wide, f/2.2, 120˚, 17mm) + 2MP (Bokeh, f/2.4) + 2MP (Macro, f/2.4)
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix f/2.2, 1/3.14"
Additional features
Speakers: Dual, Keyboard: onscreen, Keyboard Light: yes, power supply, usb-c cable, sim-needle, silicon case, Magic UI 4.2, 24 Months Warranty, SAR-Value (head): 0,8 W/kg, SAR-Value (body): 1,1 W/kg, fanless
Weight
175 g, Power Supply: 135 g
Price
600 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible competitors in comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
85.2 %
12/2021
Honor 50
SD 778G 5G, Adreno 642
175 g256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.57"2340x1080
84 %
11/2021
Motorola Edge 20
SD 778G 5G, Adreno 642
163 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.70"2400x1080
84.9 %
10/2021
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
SD 778G 5G, Adreno 642
189 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.50"2400x1080
86.4 %
10/2021
Xiaomi 11T
Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9
203 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.67"2400x1080
85.1 %
12/2021
Huawei Nova 9
SD 778G 5G, Adreno 642
175 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.57"2340x1080

Honor ,这款智能手机采用金属框架,正面和背面由玻璃制成。制造质量非常高,控制装置牢牢地坐在边框中。然而,这款智能手机没有IP认证。与我们的其他审查样本相比,Honor 50是目前较轻的智能手机之一,比同级别的其他手机略短。

Honor 50
Honor 50
Honor 50
Honor 50
Honor 50

Size comparison

164.1 mm 76.9 mm 8.8 mm 203 g163 mm 76 mm 7 mm 163 g159.9 mm 75.1 mm 8.4 mm 189 g160 mm 73.7 mm 7.77 mm 175 g159.96 mm 73.76 mm 7.78 mm 175 g

特点。Honor 50中没有微型SD

Honor 50允许使用两张NanoSIM卡。支持VoLTE和VoWi-Fi。省去了一个microSD读卡器,并提供了一个USB2.0标准的USB-C端口,用于有线数据传输。提供了DRM Widevine L1,还提供了Level 3 Camera2 API。没有通知LED或3.5毫米插孔。

右侧:音量摇杆、电源键
右侧:音量摇杆、电源键
左侧。没有连接
左侧。没有连接

软件:Honor 带有谷歌服务的智能手机

Honor 50的操作系统是基于Android 11,使用制造商自己的Magic UI 4.2作为用户界面。这个用户界面让人联想到库存的Android ,但依赖于不同的设置菜单结构,并为图片、视频和文件管理器带来自己的应用。

相应的谷歌应用程序也可以使用,并且可以顺利使用Play Store。制造商没有安装任何第三方应用程序。

软件Honor 50
软件Honor 50
软件Honor 50
软件Honor 50
软件Honor 50
软件Honor 50

通信和GNSS:有了5G和快速WLAN

Honor 50可以在GSM、3G、LTE和5G网络中建立移动连接。然而,只支持两个GSM和3G频段。安装的SoC支持LTE Cat.18,理论上允许高达1200MBit/s的下行链路和最高225MBit/s的上传数据。

NFC、蓝牙5.2和Wi-Fi 6在近场可用于Android 智能手机。用我们参考的Netgear Nighthawk AX12路由器进行测试,我们在传输过程中实现了852 MBit/s的平均速度,在数据接收过程中实现了769 MBit/s。这个结果足以在我们的测试领域的上限范围内获得一席之地。在下面的测试曲线中看到的短暂下降在三次运行中都有规律地发生。

Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi 11T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
884 (817min - 939max) MBit/s ∼100% +4%
Honor 50
Adreno 642, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
852 (384min - 906max) MBit/s ∼96%
Motorola Edge 20
Adreno 642, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
697 (664min - 716max) MBit/s ∼79% -18%
Huawei Nova 9
Adreno 642, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
692 (347min - 713max) MBit/s ∼78% -19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.59 - 1599, n=280, last 2 years)
480 MBit/s ∼54% -44%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Adreno 642, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
461 (433min - 470max) MBit/s ∼52% -46%
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi 11T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
836 (737min - 887max) MBit/s ∼100% +9%
Motorola Edge 20
Adreno 642, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
809 (717min - 844max) MBit/s ∼97% +5%
Honor 50
Adreno 642, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
769 (725min - 813max) MBit/s ∼92%
Huawei Nova 9
Adreno 642, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
727 (616min - 781max) MBit/s ∼87% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (15.5 - 1414, n=280, last 2 years)
472 MBit/s ∼56% -39%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Adreno 642, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
425 (413min - 432max) MBit/s ∼51% -45%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø768 (725-813)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø852 (384-906)
内部的GPS测试
内部的GPS测试
户外GPS测试
户外GPS测试

Honor 50可以通过GPS、GLONASS、Galileo和北斗确定位置。使用 "GPS测试 "应用程序,我们可以在户外实现高达4米的精度。

与我们参考的Garmin Edge 500设备相比,Honor 50显示的偏差略大,特别是在曲线上。然而,长的直线的记录精度是相似的。

GNSS - 摘要
GNSS - 摘要
GNSS--转折点
GNSS--转折点
GNSS - 湖泊环游
GNSS - 湖泊环游

电话功能和语音质量。与Honor 50的连接良好

Honor 50的电话应用程序提供了快速访问数字键盘、保存的收藏夹和联系人列表的功能。在通话过程中,Android 智能手机提供了一个高音量,参与者可以清楚地听到双方的声音。抑制背景噪音的工作也很可靠。

摄像机。丰富的视频功能

前置摄像头记录
前置摄像头记录

Honor 50的前置摄像头可以用3200万像素的传感器拍摄照片。质量非常好,甚至精细的细节和结构都清晰可见。颜色看起来相当自然,但也可以通过预定义的颜色过滤器进行调整。

背面的主摄像头保留了专业模式,它通过10800万像素的传感器提供详细的照片和生动的色彩。此外,还有一个800万像素的摄像头用于超广角拍摄,然而,这看起来对比度有点低,并带有轻微的模糊性。一个200万像素的传感器支持相机进行虚化拍摄,另一个传感器可用于微距拍摄。前面提到的专业模式允许手动调整焦点、ISO、快门速度、照明和白平衡。

视频录制的质量与我们测试照片中显示的类似。可用的分辨率包括30帧/秒的4K,30和60帧/秒的1080p(21:9和16:9),以及30帧/秒的720p。相机软件还提供了一个多视频功能,可以同时用前后摄像头在分屏上录制视频,也可以在前后摄像头之间无缝切换。视频录制没有专业模式。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

NahaufnahmePanoramaUltraweitwinkelZoom (5-fach)LowLight
click to load images

Honor 50的相机显示ColorChecker护照的颜色比它们应该的要强一点。测试图非常清晰,也有强烈的色彩。在下角有一个轻微的对比度弱点。

ColorChecker
5.9 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
7 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
3 ∆E
1.7 ∆E
1.4 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Honor 50: 5.87 ∆E min: 1.4 - max: 12.92 ∆E
ColorChecker
30 ∆E
55.1 ∆E
39.8 ∆E
34.8 ∆E
45.6 ∆E
62.4 ∆E
53.7 ∆E
36.1 ∆E
44.2 ∆E
29.4 ∆E
65.1 ∆E
64.1 ∆E
31.9 ∆E
47.7 ∆E
37.8 ∆E
76.8 ∆E
44.6 ∆E
42 ∆E
94.3 ∆E
71.4 ∆E
52.5 ∆E
36.9 ∆E
24.4 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Honor 50: 47.26 ∆E min: 13.91 - max: 94.33 ∆E

附件和保修。包括保护罩

Honor 50的交付范围包括一个66W的快速充电器,配有配套的USB-C电缆,一个SIM卡针,以及一个硅胶保护套。保修期为24个月。

输入设备和操作。SwiftKey是标准配置

Honor 使用微软的SwiftKey作为标准键盘。它提供了许多定制选项,很适合输入较长的文本。触摸屏的反应很安静可靠。在屏幕上进行广泛的刷卡运动也是没有问题的。

高度可靠的显示屏内指纹传感器可用于解锁智能手机。人脸识别在测试中也运行良好。

Honor 50 - 屏幕上的键盘
Honor 50 - 屏幕上的键盘
Honor 50 - 屏幕上的键盘
Honor 50 - 屏幕上的键盘

显示。120赫兹屏幕

子像素
子像素

Honor 50的显示屏是一个6.57英寸的OLED面板,分辨率为2340 x 1,080像素。最大亮度达到了良好的722cd/m²,但在没有主动照明传感器的情况下,最高只能设置到527cd/m²。在APL50测试中,亮度最高可达933 cd/m²。最低可调亮度为3.68 cd/m²,显示器的照度达到97%。

我们的 PWM测量显示在所有亮度水平上的恒定值为120赫兹,这可以被解释为永久有效的直流调光。

722
cd/m²
730
cd/m²
722
cd/m²
721
cd/m²
731
cd/m²
724
cd/m²
715
cd/m²
722
cd/m²
711
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 731 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 722 cd/m² Minimum: 3.68 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 731 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.1 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.5
ΔE Greyscale 4.2 | 0.64-98 Ø5.7
100% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.19
Honor 50
OLED, 2340x1080, 6.57
Motorola Edge 20
OLED, 2400x1080, 6.70
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.50
Xiaomi 11T
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.67
Huawei Nova 9
OLED, 2340x1080, 6.57
Screen
0%
14%
24%
20%
Brightness middle
731
479
-34%
736
1%
781
7%
621
-15%
Brightness
722
480
-34%
751
4%
782
8%
632
-12%
Brightness Distribution
97
94
-3%
96
-1%
94
-3%
96
-1%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
3.1
2.06
34%
2.18
30%
2
35%
1.7
45%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
5.8
4.54
22%
5.69
2%
2.9
50%
2.8
52%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
4.2
3.5
17%
2.1
50%
2.3
45%
2.2
48%
Gamma
2.19 100%
2.205 100%
2.27 97%
2.28 96%
2.17 101%
CCT
6818 95%
6794 96%
6563 99%
6852 95%
6806 96%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 120.5 Hz ≤ 100 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 120.5 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 120.5 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 20917 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Honor 50的OLED屏幕以出色的对比度显示色彩,并提供深沉而丰富的黑色。色彩表现也可以在设置菜单中通过预定义模式进行调整。其中,"鲜艳 "模式与 "温暖 "色温相结合,可使色彩成分的偏差最小。

CalMAN - 色彩保真度(鲜艳、温暖、sRGB)。
CalMAN - 色彩保真度(鲜艳、温暖、sRGB)。
CalMAN - 色彩空间(鲜艳、温暖、sRGB)。
CalMAN - 色彩空间(鲜艳、温暖、sRGB)。
CalMAN - 灰度(鲜艳、温暖、sRGB)。
CalMAN - 灰度(鲜艳、温暖、sRGB)。
CalMAN - 饱和度(鲜艳、温暖、sRGB)。
CalMAN - 饱和度(鲜艳、温暖、sRGB)。

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
2.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.2 ms rise
↘ 1.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (23.8 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
2.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.2 ms rise
↘ 1.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (37.5 ms).

Honor 50可以很好地在户外使用。亮度足够高,即使在非常明亮的环境光线下也能清晰地显示内容。

Honor 50户外
Honor 50户外
Honor 50户外
Honor 50户外

Honor 50的OLED面板在非常平坦的视角下显示出轻微的绿色偏光。除此以外,显示的内容没有改变。

Honor 50 - 视角稳定
Honor 50 - 视角稳定
Honor 50 - 视角稳定
Honor 50 - 视角稳定

性能。与竞争对手持平

Honor 50配备了 高通骁龙778G 5G和8GB内存,以确保系统平稳运行,这也使得运行更多要求的应用程序没有问题。

在系统性能的基准测试中,Honor 智能手机通常在我们的测试领域中取得排名靠前的位置,仅次于 小米11T.另一方面,图形密集型测试的结果有点混杂,显示的分数比我们选择的对比设备低。

Geekbench 5.3
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Honor 50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
788 Points ∼92%
Motorola Edge 20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
767 Points ∼89% -3%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
771 Points ∼90% -2%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
857 Points ∼100% +9%
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
790 Points ∼92% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (765 - 791, n=7)
780 Points ∼91% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (58 - 1755, n=267, last 2 years)
610 Points ∼71% -23%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Honor 50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
2889 Points ∼96%
Motorola Edge 20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
2785 Points ∼93% -4%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
2808 Points ∼94% -3%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
2916 Points ∼97% +1%
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
3000 Points ∼100% +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (2785 - 3000, n=7)
2864 Points ∼95% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (248 - 4914, n=267, last 2 years)
2069 Points ∼69% -28%
Vulkan Score 5.3 (sort by value)
Honor 50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
2238 Points ∼44%
Motorola Edge 20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
2304 Points ∼45% +3%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
2216 Points ∼44% -1%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
5078 Points ∼100% +127%
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
2423 Points ∼48% +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (2216 - 2423, n=7)
2293 Points ∼45% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (72 - 7701, n=170, last 2 years)
2233 Points ∼44% 0%
OpenCL Score 5.3 (sort by value)
Honor 50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
2236 Points ∼44%
Motorola Edge 20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
2226 Points ∼44% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
2359 Points ∼47% +6%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
5037 Points ∼100% +125%
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
2243 Points ∼45% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (2207 - 2359, n=7)
2249 Points ∼45% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (255 - 7514, n=170, last 2 years)
2279 Points ∼45% +2%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0 (sort by value)
Honor 50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
12076 Points ∼91%
Motorola Edge 20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
13296 Points ∼100% +10%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
12625 Points ∼95% +5%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
12120 Points ∼91% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (9330 - 13296, n=6)
11639 Points ∼88% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4436 - 17085, n=90, last 2 years)
9994 Points ∼75% -17%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Honor 50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
6340 Points ∼99%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
6352 Points ∼100% 0%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
Points ∼0% -100%
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
6358 Points ∼100% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (6340 - 6409, n=6)
6373 Points ∼100% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 11256, n=226, last 2 years)
3598 Points ∼56% -43%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Honor 50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
7224 Points ∼99%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
7241 Points ∼100% 0%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
Points ∼0% -100%
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
7276 Points ∼100% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (7189 - 7276, n=6)
7235 Points ∼99% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (54 - 16670, n=226, last 2 years)
4194 Points ∼58% -42%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Honor 50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
4439 Points ∼99%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
4442 Points ∼99% 0%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
Points ∼0% -100%
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
4410 Points ∼98% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (4410 - 4605, n=6)
4493 Points ∼100% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (677 - 5301, n=226, last 2 years)
2896 Points ∼64% -35%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Honor 50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
6638 Points ∼83%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
6559 Points ∼82% -1%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
8041 Points ∼100% +21%
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
6639 Points ∼83% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (6398 - 6703, n=6)
6566 Points ∼82% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (149 - 11895, n=254, last 2 years)
4466 Points ∼56% -33%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Honor 50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
7536 Points ∼64%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
7496 Points ∼64% -1%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
11770 Points ∼100% +56%
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
7618 Points ∼65% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (7199 - 7618, n=6)
7488 Points ∼64% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (122 - 31940, n=254, last 2 years)
5783 Points ∼49% -23%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Honor 50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
4684 Points ∼96%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
4563 Points ∼93% -3%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
3813 Points ∼78% -19%
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
4580 Points ∼94% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (4224 - 6394, n=6)
4895 Points ∼100% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (651 - 6394, n=252, last 2 years)
3139 Points ∼64% -33%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Honor 50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
5027 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
4967 Points ∼99% -1%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
Points ∼0% -100%
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
5018 Points ∼100% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (4967 - 5065, n=6)
5029 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (78 - 9138, n=223, last 2 years)
2780 Points ∼55% -45%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Honor 50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
5178 Points ∼99%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
5140 Points ∼99% -1%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
Points ∼0% -100%
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
5218 Points ∼100% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (5140 - 5218, n=6)
5192 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (62 - 11573, n=223, last 2 years)
2940 Points ∼56% -43%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Honor 50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
4561 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
4444 Points ∼97% -3%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
Points ∼0% -100%
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
4423 Points ∼97% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (4423 - 4592, n=6)
4509 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (688 - 5318, n=223, last 2 years)
2920 Points ∼64% -36%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Honor 50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
5375 Points ∼74%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
5355 Points ∼74% 0%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
7256 Points ∼100% +35%
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
5435 Points ∼75% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (5032 - 5469, n=6)
5317 Points ∼73% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (91 - 9839, n=256, last 2 years)
3675 Points ∼51% -32%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Honor 50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
5614 Points ∼67%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
5591 Points ∼67% 0%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
8353 Points ∼100% +49%
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
5637 Points ∼67% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (5103 - 5651, n=6)
5540 Points ∼66% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (73 - 16221, n=256, last 2 years)
4306 Points ∼52% -23%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Honor 50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
4677 Points ∼94%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
4664 Points ∼94% 0%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
4971 Points ∼100% +6%
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
4831 Points ∼97% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (4166 - 4942, n=6)
4634 Points ∼93% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (635 - 5793, n=256, last 2 years)
3167 Points ∼64% -32%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Honor 50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
4300 Points ∼89%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
4250 Points ∼88% -1%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
Points ∼0% -100%
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
4810 Points ∼100% +12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (4002 - 4810, n=6)
4320 Points ∼90% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (426 - 6977, n=196, last 2 years)
2672 Points ∼56% -38%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Honor 50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
5302 Points ∼99%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
5263 Points ∼98% -1%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
Points ∼0% -100%
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
5370 Points ∼100% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (5263 - 5370, n=6)
5321 Points ∼99% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (349 - 11259, n=196, last 2 years)
3006 Points ∼56% -43%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Honor 50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
2588 Points ∼73%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
2539 Points ∼72% -2%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
Points ∼0% -100%
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
3523 Points ∼100% +36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (2137 - 3523, n=6)
2654 Points ∼75% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1786 - 4061, n=196, last 2 years)
2652 Points ∼75% +2%
Wild Life Score (sort by value)
Honor 50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
2492 Points ∼60%
Motorola Edge 20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
2505 Points ∼60% +1%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
2490 Points ∼60% 0%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
4179 Points ∼100% +68%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (2465 - 2505, n=6)
2490 Points ∼60% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (153 - 9680, n=134, last 2 years)
2955 Points ∼71% +19%
Wild Life Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Honor 50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
2501 Points ∼60%
Motorola Edge 20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
2499 Points ∼60% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
2485 Points ∼59% -1%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
4194 Points ∼100% +68%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (2321 - 2501, n=6)
2466 Points ∼59% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (174 - 11700, n=131, last 2 years)
3058 Points ∼73% +22%
Wild Life Extreme (sort by value)
Honor 50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
694 Points ∼54%
Motorola Edge 20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
695 Points ∼54% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
690 Points ∼53% -1%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
1291 Points ∼100% +86%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (690 - 695, n=6)
693 Points ∼54% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (102 - 3080, n=82, last 2 years)
917 Points ∼71% +32%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited (sort by value)
Honor 50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
689 Points ∼57%
Motorola Edge 20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
690 Points ∼57% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
687 Points ∼57% 0%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
1205 Points ∼100% +75%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (684 - 690, n=6)
688 Points ∼57% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (101 - 4236, n=81, last 2 years)
936 Points ∼78% +36%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Honor 50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
99 fps ∼85%
Motorola Edge 20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
116 fps ∼100% +17%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
108 fps ∼93% +9%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
116 fps ∼100% +17%
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
60 fps ∼52% -39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (60 - 116, n=7)
91.3 fps ∼79% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8.2 - 143, n=206, last 2 years)
64.7 fps ∼56% -35%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Honor 50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
133 fps ∼72%
Motorola Edge 20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
133 fps ∼72% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
132 fps ∼71% -1%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
185 fps ∼100% +39%
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
133 fps ∼72% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (132 - 134, n=7)
133 fps ∼72% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.3 - 425, n=206, last 2 years)
123 fps ∼66% -8%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Honor 50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
68 fps ∼64%
Motorola Edge 20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
69 fps ∼65% +1%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
69 fps ∼65% +1%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
106 fps ∼100% +56%
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
59 fps ∼56% -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (59 - 69, n=7)
65.9 fps ∼62% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.5 - 121, n=205, last 2 years)
52 fps ∼49% -24%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Honor 50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
77 fps ∼63%
Motorola Edge 20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
78 fps ∼64% +1%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
77 fps ∼63% 0%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
122 fps ∼100% +58%
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
79 fps ∼65% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (77 - 79, n=7)
78 fps ∼64% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 251, n=206, last 2 years)
71.5 fps ∼59% -7%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Honor 50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
48 fps ∼64%
Motorola Edge 20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
49 fps ∼65% +2%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
49 fps ∼65% +2%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
75 fps ∼100% +56%
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
53 fps ∼71% +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (48 - 53, n=7)
49.9 fps ∼67% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.1 - 106, n=204, last 2 years)
40.5 fps ∼54% -16%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Honor 50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
56 fps ∼71%
Motorola Edge 20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
56 fps ∼71% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
56 fps ∼71% 0%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
79 fps ∼100% +41%
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
57 fps ∼72% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (56 - 57, n=7)
56.4 fps ∼71% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 169, n=204, last 2 years)
49.2 fps ∼62% -12%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Honor 50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
28 fps ∼64%
Motorola Edge 20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
29 fps ∼66% +4%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
28 fps ∼64% 0%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
44 fps ∼100% +57%
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
31 fps ∼70% +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (28 - 31, n=7)
28.9 fps ∼66% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.3 - 61, n=203, last 2 years)
25.3 fps ∼58% -10%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Honor 50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
33 fps ∼72%
Motorola Edge 20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
33 fps ∼72% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
33 fps ∼72% 0%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
46 fps ∼100% +39%
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
33 fps ∼72% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (33 - 33, n=7)
33 fps ∼72% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.8 - 96.6, n=203, last 2 years)
29.5 fps ∼64% -11%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Honor 50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
32 fps ∼65%
Motorola Edge 20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
30 fps ∼61% -6%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
30 fps ∼61% -6%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
49 fps ∼100% +53%
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
35 fps ∼71% +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (30 - 35, n=7)
31.6 fps ∼64% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.5 - 73, n=267, last 2 years)
25.8 fps ∼53% -19%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Honor 50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
38 fps ∼72%
Motorola Edge 20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
34 fps ∼64% -11%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
34 fps ∼64% -11%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
53 fps ∼100% +39%
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
38 fps ∼72% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (34 - 39, n=7)
36 fps ∼68% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.9 - 257, n=267, last 2 years)
30.3 fps ∼57% -20%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Honor 50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
20 fps ∼61%
Motorola Edge 20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
19 fps ∼58% -5%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
19 fps ∼58% -5%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
33 fps ∼100% +65%
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
22 fps ∼67% +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (19 - 22, n=7)
19.9 fps ∼60% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.1 - 60, n=268, last 2 years)
17.3 fps ∼52% -13%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Honor 50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
14 fps ∼67%
Motorola Edge 20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
13 fps ∼62% -7%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
13 fps ∼62% -7%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
21 fps ∼100% +50%
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
14 fps ∼67% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (13 - 14, n=7)
13.4 fps ∼64% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.7 - 101, n=268, last 2 years)
11.7 fps ∼56% -16%
Antutu v9 - Total Score (sort by value)
Honor 50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
519177 Points ∼91%
Motorola Edge 20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
520706 Points ∼91% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
438254 Points ∼77% -16%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
570375 Points ∼100% +10%
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
467593 Points ∼82% -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (438254 - 520706, n=7)
495281 Points ∼87% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (117053 - 815441, n=70, last 2 years)
504373 Points ∼88% -3%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Honor 50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
5002 Points ∼94%
Motorola Edge 20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
4615 Points ∼87% -8%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
4349 Points ∼82% -13%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
5319 Points ∼100% +6%
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
4950 Points ∼93% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (4321 - 5002, n=7)
4688 Points ∼88% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (615 - 8124, n=191, last 2 years)
3935 Points ∼74% -21%
System (sort by value)
Honor 50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
9880 Points ∼91%
Motorola Edge 20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
8751 Points ∼81% -11%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
9089 Points ∼84% -8%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
9292 Points ∼86% -6%
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
10816 Points ∼100% +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (8751 - 10816, n=7)
9755 Points ∼90% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1160 - 19657, n=191, last 2 years)
7133 Points ∼66% -28%
Memory (sort by value)
Honor 50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
6307 Points ∼88%
Motorola Edge 20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
5234 Points ∼73% -17%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
4269 Points ∼60% -32%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
7144 Points ∼100% +13%
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
6372 Points ∼89% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (3956 - 6372, n=7)
5217 Points ∼73% -17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (522 - 9044, n=191, last 2 years)
4628 Points ∼65% -27%
Graphics (sort by value)
Honor 50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
6659 Points ∼89%
Motorola Edge 20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
6763 Points ∼90% +2%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
6783 Points ∼90% +2%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
7516 Points ∼100% +13%
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
6726 Points ∼89% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (6654 - 6783, n=7)
6714 Points ∼89% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (349 - 25642, n=191, last 2 years)
6256 Points ∼83% -6%
Web (sort by value)
Honor 50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
1509 Points ∼94%
Motorola Edge 20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
1465 Points ∼91% -3%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
1359 Points ∼85% -10%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
1604 Points ∼100% +6%
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
1295 Points ∼81% -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (1295 - 1534, n=7)
1419 Points ∼88% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10 - 2392, n=191, last 2 years)
1332 Points ∼83% -12%

在浏览器基准测试中,Honor 50在我们的测试中总是取得第二名的成绩。紧跟在Honor 50后面的是 小米11T摩托罗拉Edge 20而Edge 20总是在比较中领先。在日常使用中,这一评价体现在网站的流畅滚动和媒体内容的快速加载。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Motorola Edge 20 (Chrome 95)
86.797 Points ∼100% +14%
Honor 50 (Chrome 96)
76.107 Points ∼88%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G (58.8 - 86.8, n=7)
74.6 Points ∼86% -2%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G (Chrome 93)
71.757 Points ∼83% -6%
Huawei Nova 9 (Huawei Browser 12.0.0.303)
58.793 Points ∼68% -23%
Average of class Smartphone (12.4 - 182, n=184, last 2 years)
55.1 Points ∼63% -28%
Xiaomi 11T (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
51.758 Points ∼60% -32%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Motorola Edge 20 (Chrome 95)
148.8 Points ∼100% +1%
Honor 50 (Chrome 96)
147.5 Points ∼99%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G (103 - 155, n=7)
132 Points ∼89% -11%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G (Chrome 93)
118.13 Points ∼79% -20%
Xiaomi 11T (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
117.59 Points ∼79% -20%
Huawei Nova 9 (Huawei Browser 12.0.0.303)
102.59 Points ∼69% -30%
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 414, n=192, last 2 years)
101 Points ∼68% -32%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Motorola Edge 20 (Chrome 95)
131 Points ∼100% +28%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G (Chrome 93)
107 Points ∼82% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G (93 - 131, n=7)
106 Points ∼81% +4%
Honor 50 (Chrome 96)
102 Points ∼78%
Huawei Nova 9 (Huawei Browser 12.0.0.303)
96 Points ∼73% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (20 - 252, n=197, last 2 years)
83.5 Points ∼64% -18%
Xiaomi 11T (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
70 Points ∼53% -31%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Motorola Edge 20 (Chrome 95)
31783 Points ∼100% +2%
Honor 50 (Chrome 96)
31134 Points ∼98%
Xiaomi 11T (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
29912 Points ∼94% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G (23915 - 31915, n=7)
28217 Points ∼89% -9%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G (Chrome 93)
25119 Points ∼79% -19%
Huawei Nova 9 (Huawei Browser 12.0.0.303)
23915 Points ∼75% -23%
Average of class Smartphone (1986 - 64222, n=203, last 2 years)
19795 Points ∼62% -36%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (414 - 29635, n=205, last 2 years)
3599 ms * ∼100% -152%
Huawei Nova 9 (Huawei Browser 12.0.0.303)
1892.7 ms * ∼53% -33%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G (Chrome 93)
1802.2 ms * ∼50% -26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G (1323 - 1893, n=7)
1569 ms * ∼44% -10%
Xiaomi 11T (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
1444.3 ms * ∼40% -1%
Honor 50 (Chrome 96)
1426.7 ms * ∼40%
Motorola Edge 20 (Chrome 95)
1344.1 ms * ∼37% +6%

* ... smaller is better

Honor ,在我们的测试机型Honor 50中安装了256GB的UFS 2.1存储。它达到了平均速度,因此与同类智能手机相差无几。另外,Honor 50也提供128GB的内部存储。

Honor 50Motorola Edge 20Samsung Galaxy A52s 5GXiaomi 11THuawei Nova 9Average 256 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-17%
-22%
11%
2%
-37%
-35%
Sequential Read 256KB
984.07
1010.9
3%
951
-3%
1789.59
82%
1030.02
5%
819 ?(496 - 984, n=21)
-17%
845 ?(45.6 - 2037, n=270, last 2 years)
-14%
Sequential Write 256KB
609
471.4
-23%
486.5
-20%
942.08
55%
758.84
25%
331 ?(199 - 609, n=21)
-46%
387 ?(11.9 - 1321, n=270, last 2 years)
-36%
Random Read 4KB
245.71
190.2
-23%
168.2
-32%
139.3
-43%
229.56
-7%
162 ?(108 - 246, n=21)
-34%
148 ?(13.5 - 325, n=270, last 2 years)
-40%
Random Write 4KB
280.18
210.6
-25%
192.5
-31%
133.27
-52%
239.23
-15%
135 ?(22.1 - 280, n=21)
-52%
140 ?(5.5 - 330, n=270, last 2 years)
-50%

游戏。高细节下的游戏

内部图形单元 高通公司Adreno 642L Honor 50的内部图形单元提供了足够的性能,甚至可以流畅地渲染要求更高的游戏。我们测试的游戏即使在高图形设置下也没有出现任何卡顿或类似情况。通过触摸屏的操作也非常好。

氩氦刀
氩氦刀
PUBG手机版
PUBG手机版

排放。负载下性能稳定

温度

Honor 50的表面温度在重载时上升到34.7℃。因此,智能手机感觉温暖,但绝不会太热。苛刻的3DMark压力测试也表明,性能在很长一段时间内保持不下降。

Max. Load
 34.7 °C34.2 °C34.5 °C 
 34.3 °C32.7 °C33.1 °C 
 33.4 °C32.7 °C33 °C 
Maximum: 34.7 °C
Average: 33.6 °C
30.7 °C31 °C32.5 °C
29.8 °C30.6 °C33 °C
29 °C29.4 °C32.1 °C
Maximum: 33 °C
Average: 30.9 °C
Power Supply (max.)  28.3 °C | Room Temperature 21.5 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.6 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34.7 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22 to 52.9 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.4 °C / 90 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Honor 50
Adreno 642, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
99.4 (14.9min) % ∼100%
Xiaomi 11T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
95.2 (23.7min) % ∼96% -4%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Honor 50
Adreno 642, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
99.8 (4.14min) % ∼100%
Xiaomi 11T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
91 (6.98min) % ∼91% -9%
05101520Tooltip
Honor 50 Adreno 642, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.5.1: Ø4.15 (4.14-4.15)
Xiaomi 11T Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.5.1: Ø7.08 (6.98-7.67)
Honor 50 Adreno 642, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø14.9 (14.9-15)
Xiaomi 11T Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø24.6 (23.7-24.8)
热图像-顶部
热图像-顶部
热图像-底面
热图像-底面

扬声器

Honor 50的扬声器播放的声音相对较大,并提供了一个在高音调上很明显的声谱。因此,它们非常适用于再现语音内容。然而,在听音乐或进行更广泛的媒体消费时,建议使用外部扬声器或耳机。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.838.8252445.43116.140.84027.641.35032.342.46323.440.9802245.71002242.21252143.116017.947.920013.355.125015.257.131513.258.540011.564.250012.269.663012.371.880013.369.7100014.574.4125012.276160011.280.1200011.781250012.184.2315012.785.6400013.683.6500013.180.5630013.677.9800013.178.41000013.675.91250013.672.71600013.563.8SPL2592.7N0.689.8median 13.3median 72.7Delta1.210.5373825.628.229.12523.425.336.839.428.431.924.836.322.436.719.242.916.955.615.650.813.854.713.461.913.361.213.865.81268.512.774.612.276.11378.213.779.813.276.513.474.81376.213.377.213.674.613.379.813.878.113.774.61463.913.55825.588.60.777.4median 13.5median 74.60.79.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHonor 50Xiaomi 11T
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Honor 50 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (92.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.1% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 29% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Xiaomi 11T audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.1% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 23% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

电池寿命。运行时间长的智能手机

消耗功率

我们的测量表明,Honor 50在空闲情况下的平均功耗为2.98瓦,比我们测试中的其他智能手机略高。另一方面,负载下的数值与同类设备持平。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.03 / 0.19 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.02 / 2.98 / 3.11 Watt
Load midlight 3.59 / 7.12 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Honor 50
4300 mAh
Motorola Edge 20
4000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
4500 mAh
Xiaomi 11T
5000 mAh
Huawei Nova 9
4300 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
19%
17%
14%
6%
14%
12%
Idle Minimum *
1.02
1
2%
1.2
-18%
0.78
24%
0.96
6%
0.977 ?(0.78 - 1.2, n=6)
4%
0.933 ?(0.12 - 2.5, n=215, last 2 years)
9%
Idle Average *
2.98
1.3
56%
1.4
53%
1.86
38%
2.47
17%
1.903 ?(1.3 - 2.98, n=6)
36%
1.774 ?(0.65 - 3.94, n=215, last 2 years)
40%
Idle Maximum *
3.11
1.6
49%
1.7
45%
1.88
40%
2.55
18%
2.09 ?(1.6 - 3.11, n=6)
33%
2 ?(0.69 - 4.01, n=215, last 2 years)
36%
Load Average *
3.59
3.9
-9%
3.6
-0%
3.98
-11%
3.85
-7%
3.68 ?(3.23 - 3.9, n=6)
-3%
4.43 ?(2.1 - 8.4, n=215, last 2 years)
-23%
Load Maximum *
7.12
7.2
-1%
6.9
3%
8.78
-23%
7.43
-4%
7.19 ?(6.9 - 7.43, n=6)
-1%
7.33 ?(3.56 - 12.3, n=215, last 2 years)
-3%

* ... smaller is better

Leistungsaufnahme: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

0123456789Tooltip
Honor 50 Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G: Ø3.88 (1.16-7.96)
Xiaomi 11T MediaTek Dimensity 1200: Ø4.27 (1.04-9.35)

Leistungsaufnahme: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

012345678Tooltip
Xiaomi 11T MediaTek Dimensity 1200; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø6.92 (4.23-8.2)
Honor 50 Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø3.99 (3.04-4.7)
Honor 50 Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G; Idle 1min: Ø1.585 (1.497-1.802)
Xiaomi 11T MediaTek Dimensity 1200; Idle 1min: Ø1.202 (1.149-1.311)

电池寿命

在我们的实际WLAN测试中,Honor 50实现了略高于15小时的运行时间。因此,它可以很好地利用其4300毫安时的电池。

附带的66瓦电源适配器可以在大约45分钟内为Honor 智能手机完全充电。

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
15h 07min
Honor 50
4300 mAh
Motorola Edge 20
4000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
4500 mAh
Xiaomi 11T
5000 mAh
Huawei Nova 9
4300 mAh
Battery Runtime
WiFi v1.3
907
716
-21%
721
-21%
813
-10%
652
-28%

Pros

+ 120赫兹显示
+ 再次支持谷歌服务
+ 良好的相机
+ 良好的性能

Cons

- 没有插孔连接器
- 只有两个GSM频段
- 没有存储卡插槽

评语:Honor ,再次与竞争对手持平

审查中:Honor 50。测试装置由。Honor 德国
审查中:Honor 50。测试装置由。Honor 德国

Honor 50是一款高质量的智能手机,这是众所周知的,也是制造商所期望的。制造质量也相应不错,相机的照片和整体系统性能也相当令人信服。较长的电池寿命和附带的快速充电器完善了智能手机的包装。

有了谷歌服务和5G,Honor 50再次成为中高档智能手机的严重竞争者。

与华为的正式分离也意味着Honor ,不再受制于阻止使用不同技术的贸易限制。因此,Android 手机现在可以再次使用谷歌服务发货,并被允许使用目前的高通芯片与5G。这确保了与像小米11T这样的设备进行体面的竞争。 小米11T摩托罗拉Edge 20.

哪些限制将继续存在于母公司中,将在不久后公布的外部相同的审查中得知 华为Nova 9.

价格和可用性

Honor 50现在已经上市,可以在以下网站购买 亚马逊购买,价格大大低于 比零售价低得多。.

Honor 50 - 12/20/2021 v7
Mike Wobker

Chassis
86%
Keyboard
66 / 75 → 88%
Pointing Device
95%
Connectivity
51 / 70 → 73%
Weight
90%
Battery
91%
Display
87%
Games Performance
53 / 64 → 82%
Application Performance
80 / 86 → 93%
Temperature
92%
Noise
100%
Audio
79 / 90 → 88%
Camera
62%
Average
79%
85%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Ninh Duy
Editor of the original article: Ninh Duy - Editorial Assistant - 214745 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008
contact me via: Facebook
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > Honor 50智能手机的回顾。没有华为就有谷歌
Mike Wobker, 2021-12-27 (Update: 2021-12-27)