Notebookcheck

三星Galaxy A52s 5G智能手机评论。在其最新版本中拥有更多的力量

强大的新功能。 仅仅过了半年,三星最受欢迎的中档智能手机之一已经有了更新。乍一看,三星Galaxy A52s 5G只提供了性能上的改进,但我们在测试中仔细观察,发现了进一步的差异。
Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL/Stefan Hinum), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
5G Android ARM Smartphone
三星Galaxy A52s

一款拥有5G和良好摄像头的高质量中端智能手机?显然,买家似乎很喜欢这样。毕竟,三星的Galaxy A50系列自推出以来一直是一个真正的热门,如果你把我们评论文章的浏览量,甚至是主要在线零售商的销售排行榜作为一个标志的话。

Galaxy A52s是Galaxy A52的5G机型的一个小更新,采用了新的SoC。虽然所有其他规格保持不变,但也有一些差异,例如在性能方面,所以我们将在新的评论中看看最新的机型。

, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G (Galaxy A50 Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G 8 x 1.8 - 2.4 GHz, Kryo 670 (Cortex-A78/A55)
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 642L
Memory
6144 MB 
Display
6.50 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 405 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, AMOLED, Gorilla Glass 5, glossy: yes, 120 Hz
Storage
128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 102 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm audio jack, Card Reader: microSD up to 1 TB, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: acceleration sensor, gyroscope, compass
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G, 3G, 4G (B1/​B2/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B12/​B17/​B20/​B26/​B28/​B32/​B38/​B40/​B41/​B66), 5G (n1/​n3/​n5/​n7/​n8/​n20/​n28/​n38/​n40/​n41/​n66/​n78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.4 x 159.9 x 75.1
Battery
4500 mAh Lithium-Ion
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 11
Camera
Primary Camera: 64 MPix 64 MP f/​1.8, phase-comparison AF, OIS, LED flash, videos @2160p/​30fps (camera 1); 12 MP, f/​2.2, wide-angle lens (camera 2); 5 MP, f/​2.4, macro lens (camera 3); 5 MP, f/​2.4, depth of field (camera 4)
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix f/​2.2, videos @1080p/​30fps
Additional features
Speakers: stereo speakers, Keyboard: virtual keyboard, 15-watt charger, USB cable, SIM tool, 24 Months Warranty, IP67-certified; SAR: 0.878 W/​kg (head), 0.842W/​kg (body); A-GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo, QZSS, fanless, waterproof
Weight
189 g
Price
449 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible contenders in comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
84.9 %
10/2021
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
SD 778G 5G, Adreno 642
189 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.50"2400x1080
82.7 %
04/2021
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
SD 750G 5G, Adreno 619
189 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.50"2400x1080
84.9 %
08/2021
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9
189 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.43"2400x1080
85.4 %
05/2021
Motorola Moto G100
SD 870, Adreno 650
207 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.70"2520x1080
85.7 %
05/2021
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
SD 780G 5G, Adreno 642
159 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.55"2400x1080

看一下三星Galaxy A52s 5G的外观,我们没有注意到与前代产品相比有什么不同。重量和尺寸都是一样的,后置摄像头仍然从外壳上突出不少。

黑色、紫色和白色仍可作为颜色选择,但现在没有蓝色机型,而是有一个略微微妙的薄荷绿机型。设计仍然相当圆滑,有哑光的背面,比以前的设备更有棱角。

机箱的稳定性相当令人满意,但当你试图扭动它时,智能手机会发出吱吱的声音。

在材料方面也没有什么变化。前面是大猩猩5号玻璃,而外壳的其他部分是由塑料制成的,在侧面模仿金属框架。三星在这方面是与时俱进的。OnePlus Nord 2 5G ,例如,正面和背面也采用了大猩猩5号玻璃。因此,屏幕得到了很好的保护,不会被摔碎。Galaxy 智能手机还根据IP67标准进行了防水和防尘保护,因此它也可以在更恶劣的环境中使用。

三星Galaxy A52s
三星Galaxy A52s
三星Galaxy A52s
三星Galaxy A52s
三星Galaxy A52s
三星Galaxy A52s

Size comparison

168.4 mm 74 mm 9.7 mm 207 g159.9 mm 75.1 mm 8.4 mm 189 g159.9 mm 75.1 mm 8.4 mm 189 g159.1 mm 73.3 mm 8.3 mm 189 g160.53 mm 75.72 mm 6.81 mm 159 g

连接性 - 两个音频端口

三星提供的智能手机有两个版本,都有全部四种颜色的版本。

  • 三星Galaxy A52s 5G - 128GB存储/6GB内存:449欧元(约合521美元)。
  • 三星Galaxy A52s 5G--256GB存储/8GB内存:509欧元(约591美元)。

USB-C端口只提供USB 2.0的速度。虽然有一个专用的3.5毫米音频插孔,但你也可以使用USB-C端口进行音频输出。如果你想在没有适配器的情况下使用你的有线耳机,三星提供这两种选择的事实是非常方便的。

蓝牙5.0和NFC也是配置的一部分。

左边:没有端口
左边:没有端口
右边。待机按钮,音量摇杆
右边。待机按钮,音量摇杆
顶部:麦克风,SIM卡托盘
顶部:麦克风,SIM卡托盘
底部。 3.5毫米音频插孔、麦克风、USB-C端口、扬声器
底部。 3.5毫米音频插孔、麦克风、USB-C端口、扬声器

微型SD卡读卡器

该microSD读卡器支持容量高达1TB的卡。使用我们的Angelbird V60参考卡的速度相当快,但在读取速度方面与其他智能手机不尽相同。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Adreno 642, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Angelbird V60)
52.4 MB/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
50.32 MB/s ∼96% -4%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Adreno 642, SD 780G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
18.08 MB/s ∼35% -65%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

05101520253035404550556065707580859016.822.130.23425.136.326.825.821.729.734.126.924.426.823.425.622.529.42229.823.133.222.725.824.324.428.223.425.923.131.322.329.12235.529.123.226.323.227.521.824.62227.92328.523.832.937.824.126.922.826.224.526.929.721.328.323.833.427.2233321.331.323.225.125.527.624.226.624.423.124.425.825.426.426.625.324.924.524.627.618.533.92425.525.622.131.422.926.719.829.326.124.425.823.927.526.626.322.927.421.522.924.230.323.434.12624.723.623.723.925.422.525.123.324.927.627.321.627.320.824.126.426.423.450.748.850.248.652.449.551.742.639.737.642.341.338.143.236.238.937.439.636.839.841.84141.536.840.740.739.335.540.637.740.840.241.54140.139413641.441.138.54344.338.740.737.939.141.24139.236.443.144.241.239.238.235.542.842.235.341.541.242.340.842.53641.942.645.642.941.441.941.942.44237.942.739.838.242.441.539.840.839.238.436.239.136.740.944.534.942.342.134.738.64040.239.336.742.94140.539.439.744.241.9424540.34240.840.339.445.340.23840.641.137.44440.438.538.543.937.639.637.742.442.947.743.643.446.344.1403638.436.837.53937.836.133.139.338.13737.338.737.535.529.938.837.335.841.135.735.735.639.935.338.43642.33634.236.237.538383642.137.138.235.140.236.230.835.340.936.836.533.137.836.238.632.738.438.635.936.438.335.536.437.439.23436.840.236.137.935.940.430.135.537.537.337.933.136.43739.538.837.141.536.238.235.339.735.837.635.14136.437.138.537.936.731.13934.735.937.937.638.634.437.438.138.736.742.535.438.536.940.536.138.835.240.536.338.126.434.837.230.735.840.451.552.451.150.152.351.850.246.7384640.841.940.738.842.536.638.637.436.941.44142.344.438.234.842.140.637.441.948.243.238.441.841.741.240.740.436.537.640.538.346.34139.940.239.241.337.44140.536.140.739.738.141.840.837.838.239.241.641.341.439.942.63638.940.340.936.341.741.54236.437.939.138.941.64140.338.840.240.741.537.937.444.741.43638.64041.241.942.237.142.543.442.242.538.139.343.140.139.239.636.341.241.835.440.340.842.141.936.939.343.739.442.639.83940.136.745.243.741.944.342.23941.416.822.130.23425.136.326.825.821.729.734.126.924.426.823.425.622.529.42229.823.133.222.725.824.324.428.223.425.923.131.322.329.12235.529.123.226.323.227.521.824.62227.92328.523.832.937.824.126.922.826.224.526.929.721.328.323.833.427.2233321.331.323.225.125.527.624.226.624.423.124.425.825.426.426.625.324.924.524.627.618.533.92425.525.622.131.422.926.719.829.326.124.425.823.927.526.626.322.927.421.522.924.230.323.434.12624.723.623.723.925.422.525.123.324.927.627.321.627.320.824.126.426.423.450.748.850.248.652.449.551.742.639.737.642.341.338.143.236.238.937.439.636.839.841.84141.536.840.740.739.335.540.637.740.840.241.54140.139413641.441.138.54344.338.740.737.939.141.24139.236.443.144.241.239.238.235.542.842.235.341.541.242.340.842.53641.942.645.642.941.441.941.942.44237.942.739.838.242.441.539.840.839.238.436.239.136.740.944.534.942.342.134.738.64040.239.336.742.94140.539.439.744.241.9424540.34240.840.339.445.340.23840.641.137.44440.438.538.543.937.639.637.742.442.947.743.643.446.344.1403638.436.837.53937.836.133.139.338.13737.338.737.535.529.938.837.335.841.135.735.735.639.935.338.43642.33634.236.237.538383642.137.138.235.140.236.230.835.340.936.836.533.137.836.238.632.738.438.635.936.438.335.536.437.439.23436.840.236.137.935.940.430.135.537.537.337.933.136.43739.538.837.141.536.238.235.339.735.837.635.14136.437.138.537.936.731.13934.735.937.937.638.634.437.438.138.736.742.535.438.536.940.536.138.835.240.536.338.126.434.837.230.735.840.451.552.451.150.152.351.850.246.7384640.841.940.738.842.536.638.637.436.941.44142.344.438.234.842.140.637.441.948.243.238.441.841.741.240.740.436.537.640.538.346.34139.940.239.241.337.44140.536.140.739.738.141.840.837.838.239.241.641.341.439.942.63638.940.340.936.341.741.54236.437.939.138.941.64140.338.840.240.741.537.937.444.741.43638.64041.241.942.237.142.543.442.242.538.139.343.140.139.239.636.341.241.835.440.340.842.141.936.939.343.739.442.639.83940.136.745.243.741.944.342.23941.46272.372.572.67272.572.573.371.572.871.873.172.672.271.972.272.670.372.771.572.572.171.172.673.471.272.772.672.771.572.272.872.470.872.372.573.472.872.472.674.37371.773.472.371.8737372.971.973.372.371.372.871.17271.673.972.871.772.671.971.773.771.673.472.472.470.872.171.371.373.871.773.47171.872.873.271.672.57472.872.571.772.573.771.674.771.472.372.67271.671.672.372.573.372.27273.671.77173.772.67372.472.473.472.671.273.373.150.174.671.770.173.471.571.675.671.573.162.86463.464.464.545.454.667.679.28078.975.179.579.879.480.280.161.470.269.174.97468.963.376.578.668.871.677.676.267.163.569.969.562.849.57865.879.774.667.972.871.575.371.272.677.97476.977.571.270.769.666.860.273.480.47479.478.770.376.47575.877.578.97979.67378.676.978.178.679.679.679.979.978.279.97775.978.17979.779.779.379.177.676.975.475.976.669.577.177.377.77878.779.576.379.777.478.17977.878.67673.378.579.279.378.375.678.67977.77552.368.670.176.873.478.278.37778.876.877.477.377.974.371.478.116.961.122.422.822.622.722.422.622.822.422.722.622.422.622.622.622.822.422.622.622.622.622.622.622.822.422.622.722.222.522.522.422.822.422.622.622.622.622.622.822.522.622.622.422.622.622.622.622.622.822.422.522.722.622.422.622.622.822.622.622.622.422.822.422.622.622.622.722.422.822.422.622.522.722.522.622.622.622.422.622.622.622.622.622.622.622.622.622.622.622.622.622.622.622.622.822.422.620.936.18282.281.181.582.182.382.181.48279.38579.581.782.282.981.581.982.682.183.879.881.869.768.26969.469.776.931.388.887.687.985.591.288.3888788.587.68888.583.484.782.490.579.18688.58389.888.578.491.886.888.187.588.387.988.786.888.385.188.687.188.887.688.287.281.189.487.484.889.785.288.287.48887.889.685.989.387.886.587.989.887.387.985.890.187.285.985.489.28587.881.584.685.886.788.88487.687.582.389.686.181.190.492.385.487.487.784.689.588.187.889.286.886.287.786.189.587.687.787.888.888.38887.489.185.989.686.888.287.988.287.788.987.189.884.788.486.187.983.692.588.186.984.685.984.590.287.987.587.488.3Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G Adreno 642, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Sequential write; Angelbird V60: Ø25.9 (16.8-37.8)
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Sequential write; Toshiba Exceria Pro M501: Ø40.8 (34.7-52.4)
Motorola Moto G100 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Sequential write; Angelbird : Ø37.3 (26.4-47.7)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G Adreno 642, SD 780G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Sequential write: Ø40.9 (34.8-52.4)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G Adreno 642, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Sequential read; Angelbird V60: Ø71.8 (50.1-75.6)
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Sequential read; Toshiba Exceria Pro M501: Ø74.7 (45.4-80.4)
Motorola Moto G100 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Sequential read; Angelbird V60: Ø35.4 (16.9-85)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G Adreno 642, SD 780G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Sequential read: Ø86.8 (31.3-92.5)

软件--三星手机上最新的安全补丁

Android 11被预装在智能手机上,而三星内部的OneUI 3.1被安装在它上面。它强烈地定制了外观,并尽可能地将控制权转移到屏幕的下半部分,这样,即使是手小的用户也能轻松使用。

堪称典范。在测试时,安全补丁是完全最新的。三星承诺为许多智能手机提供至少4年的安全补丁 几个月前,而Galaxy A52s 5G目前甚至收到每月的更新 。然而,当涉及到新的Android 版本时,由于三星没有做出任何声明,因此此事还没有定论。毕竟,根据三星的更新网站 ,硬件有可能在未来的Android 代不再得到支持。

这听起来不是很可信,原因有三。首先,其他制造商至少能够承诺一个或两个新的Android 。其次,智能手机组件的标准化程度很高,对几代Android 的支持应该得到保证。第三,作为世界上最大的Android 智能手机制造商之一,三星在这里肯定有一些影响。

因此,我们只能根据经验,假设为目前的中档智能手机(如Galaxy A52s 5G)更新到Android 12是很有可能发生的。但目前,没有人可以肯定,事情会如何发展。

通常的三星应用程序都在船上,但它们重复了一些Android 已经提供的功能,如谷歌游戏商店或浏览器。此外,你必须处理一些预装的广告应用程序,但它们可以轻易卸载。

三星Galaxy A52s 5G软件
三星Galaxy A52s 5G软件
三星Galaxy A52s 5G软件
三星Galaxy A52s 5G软件

通信和GNSS - 平均速度

三星Galaxy A52s 5G的名字已经暗示它支持快速移动互联网,就像LTE一样,可以使用几个频率,这通常应该足够在国外旅行。在我们的样本测试中,信号质量比其他智能手机差。虽然在大楼的一个地方显示了完整的网络强度,但Galaxy A52s 5G只处理了一半的接收。

当涉及到Wi-Fi 5时,三星Galaxy A52s 5G落后于其他中档智能手机。虽然在Wi-Fi速度方面比Galaxy A52 5G有明显的优势,但由于支持Wi-Fi 6,小米11 LiteOnePlus Nord 2要领先很多。当它靠近路由器时,Wi-Fi模块的接收强度非常好,但在10米的距离和穿过三面墙时,只有一半的接收效果,而且速度也明显节流。

Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Adreno 642, SD 780G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
891 (847min - 921max) MBit/s ∼100% +93%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
888 (842min - 904max) MBit/s ∼100% +93%
Motorola Moto G100
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
692 (643min - 704max) MBit/s ∼78% +50%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Adreno 642, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
461 (433min - 470max) MBit/s ∼52%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.59 - 1599, n=285, last 2 years)
453 MBit/s ∼51% -2%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
282 (275min - 287max) MBit/s ∼32% -39%
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
877 (657min - 928max) MBit/s ∼100% +106%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Adreno 642, SD 780G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
874 (833min - 900max) MBit/s ∼100% +106%
Motorola Moto G100
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
788 (733min - 833max) MBit/s ∼90% +85%
Average of class Smartphone
  (15.5 - 1414, n=285, last 2 years)
448 MBit/s ∼51% +5%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Adreno 642, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
425 (413min - 432max) MBit/s ∼48%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
331 (322min - 337max) MBit/s ∼38% -22%
0255075100125150175200225250275300325350375400425450422420413422425426427425425429427421426429424432426422431423421426426421422429427426426421422420413422425426427425425429427421426429424432426422431423421426426421422429427426426421433457456453470458464464466467457463461463463456463469468454469461460460467461466466454458Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø425 (413-432)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø461 (433-470)
室外的GPS测试
室外的GPS测试
可用的卫星
可用的卫星

A-GPS、GLONASS、BeiDou、Galileo和QZSS被用于定位。在户外,我们的位置被确定,精确度达到3米,几乎没有延迟。找到的卫星数量是足够的。

Galaxy A52s 5G必须在我们的自行车骑行实践中再次证明自己,这段路程几乎有15公里长。我们带着Garmin Edge 520作为对比设备。两台设备在测量距离方面的差异是160米,这相当于大约1%的偏差。

Galaxy A52s 5G似乎做得相当好,细节也显示我们的位置通常是正确的。过桥或穿过森林并没有给智能手机的追踪模块带来任何重大挑战。

因此,我们可以推荐这款智能手机用于在私人区域进行导航。

Garmin Edge 520定位 - 概述
Garmin Edge 520定位 - 概述
Garmin Edge 520定位 - 桥梁
Garmin Edge 520定位 - 桥梁
Garmin Edge 520定位 - 转折点
Garmin Edge 520定位 - 转折点
三星Galaxy A52s 5G定位 - 概述
三星Galaxy A52s 5G定位 - 概述
三星Galaxy A52s 5G定位 - Bridge
三星Galaxy A52s 5G定位 - Bridge
三星Galaxy A52s 5G定位 - 转折点
三星Galaxy A52s 5G定位 - 转折点

电话和通话质量--三星公司的电话听起来有些发闷

三星使用其内部的电话应用,与谷歌的标准应用相比,它更注重键盘,但在短暂的熟悉期后,它也非常容易上手。

这款手机的通话质量相当一般。另一端的人通过内置的听筒听起来有点闷,但如果需要的话,声音还算大。即使我们说得再小声,对方也能听到我们说什么。这里的质量也很一般。

当我们使用扬声器和免提麦克风时,电话另一端的人听起来非常高亢,这使得声音有点单薄,但很清晰。我们的声音能很好地传递给对方。然而,当我们说得更小声时,他们必须仔细听,才能听懂我们的话。

照相机 - 没有混合变焦

前置摄像头样本
前置摄像头样本

三星Galaxy A52 5G

相比,相机系统没有变化:你继续主要用6400万像素的镜头拍照,通常是将每四个像素组合成一个光线密集的图像点。这导致了1600万像素的照片,但你也可以在一个特殊模式下使用全分辨率。当然,也有一个光学图像稳定器,以及一个用于景深的辅助镜头。

用主镜头拍摄的照片对于这个价格范围来说是不错的;花的主体看起来非常明亮,周围图像的动态也很好。然而,在仔细观察时,细节被冲淡了。在低光下可接受的细节再现是令人高兴的,但该镜头在提亮黑暗区域方面仍然可以做得更好一些。

如果你想获得更大的视野,你可以使用广角镜头。它在色彩方面产生的照片还不错,但在细节上相当不准确,而且在边缘也有相当大的扭曲。在主镜头和超广角镜头之间没有平滑的混合变焦,你只能在这两个镜头之间直接交替使用。这使得该系统有点不太灵活。

视频可以以最高4K和30帧的速度录制;60帧的全高清分辨率也是可能的。甚至在录制时也可以在主摄像头和广角摄像头之间切换。在我们的测试中,自动对焦和亮度调节工作相当可靠、快速和流畅。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main camera - FlowersMain camera - SurroundingsMain camera - Low lightWide-angle lens

我们在实验室里再次评估了该相机在固定照明条件下的成像性能。事实证明,只要你不看细节,三星Galaxy A52s 5G的主镜头在全光照下是相当好的。你会得到苍白的颜色,部分模糊的文字,以及边缘模糊的地方。

在1勒克斯的照度下,图像内容几乎是可识别的,但细节看起来被冲淡了,而且区域模糊不清。

ColorChecker
19.8 ∆E
17 ∆E
20.9 ∆E
19.8 ∆E
20.3 ∆E
15.3 ∆E
20.1 ∆E
19.4 ∆E
14.5 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
16.8 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
14.6 ∆E
10.9 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
16.3 ∆E
5 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
14.3 ∆E
15.9 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G: 14.45 ∆E min: 4.96 - max: 20.88 ∆E
ColorChecker
28.6 ∆E
42.9 ∆E
35.4 ∆E
33.9 ∆E
41.2 ∆E
55.6 ∆E
40.4 ∆E
32.1 ∆E
29.5 ∆E
28.6 ∆E
51.4 ∆E
52.7 ∆E
31.2 ∆E
38.1 ∆E
24.2 ∆E
49.4 ∆E
35 ∆E
40.5 ∆E
51.1 ∆E
52.6 ∆E
43.9 ∆E
34.2 ∆E
23.3 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G: 37.88 ∆E min: 13.35 - max: 55.57 ∆E

附件和保修 - 盒子里的电源适配器很弱

那么,三星。你制造了一个可以用25瓦特充电的智能手机,然后你只包括一个15瓦特的充电器?真的吗?同时,竞争对手证明,在这个价格范围内可以做得更好。你不必像OnePlus的65瓦快速充电那样。小米,甚至摩托罗拉在Moto G100中的20瓦充电器,提供更好的设备。

然后你在你的德国网上商店 ,甚至不提供25瓦的兼容充电器,而只提供20瓦的充电器?当然,Galaxy A52s 5G也可以使用通用充电器。但这一切都非常令人困惑,特别是对于那些不那么懂技术的客户。而且,任何得到一个更快的充电器的人,到时家里都会多出一块电子垃圾,即原始电源适配器。

除了USB线和一个SIM卡工具,盒子里没有其他配件。

三星在中欧为其智能手机提供24个月的保修。制造商在较大的城市设有维修中心,甚至是移动维修巴士。此外,你可以在三星的网站 ,轻松查询保修期外的维修费用

输入设备和处理 - 120赫兹的显示屏提供了流畅的滚动功能

120赫兹的显示屏和准确的触摸屏使智能手机的反应非常灵敏。当你浏览菜单时,延迟或滞后现象几乎不存在。在应用程序中,情况可能会有点不同,因为这并不是一个固定的120赫兹速率。为了节省电池寿命,显示屏会自动检测适当的刷新率,并在必要时降低刷新率。这工作相当可靠。在测试中,我们偶尔会注意到微小的停顿,但这是非常罕见的,只有在仔细检查时才能看到。

唯一的硬件按钮在机箱的右侧,它们专门用于待机和音量控制功能。它们突出于机身,因此很容易被发现。然而,由于其非常狭窄的形状,它们按起来并不舒服。

指纹传感器位于屏幕下方,对我们来说有点太靠近底部边缘了。一旦你习惯了它,解锁设备是相当快的,但有一点延迟是明显的。指纹传感器在屏幕关闭时也能发挥作用,只要你碰到正确的位置。

通过面部识别解锁手机也是可能的,这也是相当可靠的工作。

纵向模式下的键盘
纵向模式下的键盘
横向模式下的键盘
横向模式下的键盘

显示屏 - 采用AMOLED技术的三星智能手机

子像素网格
子像素网格

我们已经在三星Galaxy A52 5G 中看到了这种AMOLED显示屏:它有一个扩展的全高清分辨率,在需要时可以变得非常明亮。

由于该技术,单个OLED可以完全关闭,这在理论上允许显示屏显示全黑,同时提供无限高的对比度。尽管由于环境光和杂散光的影响,这在实践中并不能100%实现,但你肯定会得到明亮的色彩和深邃的黑色。

该显示屏还获得了HDR10+认证,这并不令人惊讶。

751
cd/m²
746
cd/m²
769
cd/m²
747
cd/m²
736
cd/m²
764
cd/m²
743
cd/m²
739
cd/m²
763
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 769 cd/m² Average: 750.9 cd/m² Minimum: 2.56 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 96 %
Center on Battery: 736 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.18 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.5
ΔE Greyscale 2.1 | 0.64-98 Ø5.7
138.1% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.27
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.50
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Super AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.50
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.43
Motorola Moto G100
IPS/LTPS, 2520x1080, 6.70
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.55
Screen
-4%
-28%
-71%
-16%
Brightness middle
736
744
1%
594
-19%
562
-24%
863
17%
Brightness
751
749
0%
594
-21%
535
-29%
860
15%
Brightness Distribution
96
98
2%
99
3%
90
-6%
93
-3%
Black Level *
0.57
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.18
2.2
-1%
2.74
-26%
3.99
-83%
3.2
-47%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
5.69
7
-23%
6
-5%
9.74
-71%
5.2
9%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.1
2.1
-0%
4.2
-100%
6.5
-210%
3.9
-86%
Gamma
2.27 97%
2.06 107%
2.278 97%
2.174 101%
2.33 94%
CCT
6563 99%
6516 100%
7322 89%
6882 94%
7299 89%
Contrast
986

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 231.5 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 231.5 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 231.5 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17043 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

在我们的CalMAN测量中,显示器做得非常好,特别是在 "自然 "色彩模式下,只有在色彩和灰度上有轻微的偏差。然而,在这种模式下,强烈的红色和绿色看起来也略有失真,所以对于专业的图像再现来说,它还不是很够用。

CalMAN灰度 - "饱和 "色彩模式
CalMAN灰度 - "饱和 "色彩模式
卡尔曼灰度 - "自然 "色彩模式
卡尔曼灰度 - "自然 "色彩模式
CalMAN色彩精度 - "饱和 "色彩模式
CalMAN色彩精度 - "饱和 "色彩模式
CalMAN色彩精度 - "自然 "色彩模式
CalMAN色彩精度 - "自然 "色彩模式
卡尔曼sRGB色彩空间
卡尔曼sRGB色彩空间
CalMAN AdobeRGB色彩空间
CalMAN AdobeRGB色彩空间
卡尔曼DCI-P3色彩空间
卡尔曼DCI-P3色彩空间
卡尔曼饱和度
卡尔曼饱和度

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5 ms rise
↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 9 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (23.8 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6 ms rise
↘ 4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 11 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (37.7 ms).

虽然当你从很平的角度看显示屏时,你必须忍受轻微的变暗,但在日常使用中并不十分明显。

明亮的显示屏也可以在户外阳光充足的环境中使用,但上面的反光会让你想移到阴凉处。

视角
视角
户外使用
户外使用

性能--现在动力更强

高通公司相当新的骁龙778G,是一款用于中高端的SoC,因此正好适合我们的测试设备。这也导致了与Galaxy A52 5G前身相比最明显的区别。系统性能显著提高。在Geekbench 5.3多核测试中增加了50%,这说明了一切。这款Galaxy 智能手机现在也能与其余的对比设备竞争。

当涉及到图形时,我们可以看到这里也实现了大幅度的性能提升。Adreno 642L与前代产品Adreno 619相比,现在实现了70%甚至80%的基准测试结果。同时,其余的比较设备提供了相当多的图形能力。

Geekbench 5.3
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
771 Points ∼79%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
636 Points ∼65% -18%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
809 Points ∼83% +5%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
972 Points ∼100% +26%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
809 Points ∼83% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (771 - 791, n=2)
781 Points ∼80% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (58 - 1755, n=249, last 2 years)
596 Points ∼61% -23%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
2808 Points ∼94%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1878 Points ∼63% -33%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
2463 Points ∼82% -12%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
2870 Points ∼96% +2%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
2998 Points ∼100% +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (2808 - 2810, n=2)
2809 Points ∼94% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (248 - 4829, n=249, last 2 years)
2028 Points ∼68% -28%
Vulkan Score 5.3 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
2216 Points ∼49%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1272 Points ∼28% -43%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
4501 Points ∼100% +103%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
3369 Points ∼75% +52%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
2805 Points ∼62% +27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (2216 - 2233, n=2)
2225 Points ∼49% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (72 - 6524, n=146, last 2 years)
2188 Points ∼49% -1%
OpenCL Score 5.3 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
2359 Points ∼50%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1304 Points ∼28% -45%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
4726 Points ∼100% +100%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
3555 Points ∼75% +51%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
2809 Points ∼59% +19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (2218 - 2359, n=2)
2289 Points ∼48% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (255 - 7514, n=148, last 2 years)
2273 Points ∼48% -4%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
12625 Points ∼100%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
8486 Points ∼67% -33%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
11218 Points ∼89% -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (9330 - 12625, n=2)
10978 Points ∼87% -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4436 - 17085, n=68, last 2 years)
9959 Points ∼79% -21%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
6352 Points ∼91%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3902 Points ∼56% -39%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
6989 Points ∼100% +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (6352 - 6392, n=2)
6372 Points ∼91% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 11256, n=236, last 2 years)
3483 Points ∼50% -45%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
7241 Points ∼84%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
4076 Points ∼47% -44%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
8588 Points ∼100% +19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (7189 - 7241, n=2)
7215 Points ∼84% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (54 - 16670, n=236, last 2 years)
4066 Points ∼47% -44%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
4442 Points ∼98%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3394 Points ∼75% -24%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
4233 Points ∼94% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (4442 - 4605, n=2)
4524 Points ∼100% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (607 - 5301, n=236, last 2 years)
2816 Points ∼62% -37%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
6559 Points ∼82%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
4040 Points ∼50% -38%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
8035 Points ∼100% +23%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
5587 Points ∼70% -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (6559 - 6703, n=2)
6631 Points ∼83% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (149 - 11895, n=259, last 2 years)
4237 Points ∼53% -35%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
7496 Points ∼55%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
4239 Points ∼31% -43%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
13531 Points ∼100% +81%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
8380 Points ∼62% +12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (7473 - 7496, n=2)
7485 Points ∼55% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (122 - 31940, n=259, last 2 years)
5444 Points ∼40% -27%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
4563 Points ∼96%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3469 Points ∼73% -24%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
3318 Points ∼70% -27%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
2567 Points ∼54% -44%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (4563 - 4926, n=2)
4745 Points ∼100% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (620 - 5784, n=257, last 2 years)
3019 Points ∼64% -34%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
4967 Points ∼97%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2750 Points ∼54% -45%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
5098 Points ∼100% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (4967 - 5062, n=2)
5015 Points ∼98% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (78 - 9138, n=233, last 2 years)
2678 Points ∼53% -46%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
5140 Points ∼84%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2603 Points ∼43% -49%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
6087 Points ∼100% +18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (5140 - 5215, n=2)
5178 Points ∼85% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (62 - 11573, n=233, last 2 years)
2836 Points ∼47% -45%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
4444 Points ∼98%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3428 Points ∼76% -23%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
3144 Points ∼70% -29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (4444 - 4592, n=2)
4518 Points ∼100% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 5318, n=233, last 2 years)
2835 Points ∼63% -36%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
5355 Points ∼77%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2927 Points ∼42% -45%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
6960 Points ∼100% +30%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
4478 Points ∼64% -16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (5355 - 5469, n=2)
5412 Points ∼78% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (91 - 9839, n=260, last 2 years)
3460 Points ∼50% -35%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
5591 Points ∼55%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2802 Points ∼27% -50%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
10199 Points ∼100% +82%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
6148 Points ∼60% +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (5591 - 5641, n=2)
5616 Points ∼55% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (73 - 16221, n=260, last 2 years)
3993 Points ∼39% -29%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
4664 Points ∼97%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3466 Points ∼72% -26%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
3296 Points ∼69% -29%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
2354 Points ∼49% -50%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (4664 - 4942, n=2)
4803 Points ∼100% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (620 - 5793, n=260, last 2 years)
3055 Points ∼64% -34%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
4250 Points ∼90%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2582 Points ∼55% -39%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
4699 Points ∼100% +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (4002 - 4250, n=2)
4126 Points ∼88% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (426 - 6977, n=198, last 2 years)
2620 Points ∼56% -38%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
5263 Points ∼91%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2520 Points ∼44% -52%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
5785 Points ∼100% +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (5263 - 5332, n=2)
5298 Points ∼92% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (349 - 11259, n=198, last 2 years)
2940 Points ∼51% -44%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
2539 Points ∼90%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2823 Points ∼100% +11%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
2795 Points ∼99% +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (2137 - 2539, n=2)
2338 Points ∼83% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1786 - 4061, n=198, last 2 years)
2641 Points ∼94% +4%
Wild Life Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
2490 Points ∼59%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1103 Points ∼26% -56%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
4208 Points ∼100% +69%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
4166 Points ∼99% +67%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
3196 Points ∼76% +28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (2484 - 2490, n=2)
2487 Points ∼59% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (153 - 9386, n=113, last 2 years)
2968 Points ∼71% +19%
Wild Life Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
2485 Points ∼59%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1097 Points ∼26% -56%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
4214 Points ∼100% +70%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
4152 Points ∼99% +67%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
3212 Points ∼76% +29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (2485 - 2488, n=2)
2487 Points ∼59% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (174 - 11700, n=109, last 2 years)
3100 Points ∼74% +25%
Wild Life Extreme (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
690 Points ∼54%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
1283 Points ∼100% +86%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
865 Points ∼67% +25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (690 - 692, n=2)
691 Points ∼54% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (83 - 3059, n=61, last 2 years)
953 Points ∼74% +38%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
687 Points ∼55%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
1256 Points ∼100% +83%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
786 Points ∼63% +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (687 - 690, n=2)
689 Points ∼55% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (101 - 2864, n=58, last 2 years)
931 Points ∼74% +36%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
108 fps ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
53 fps ∼49% -51%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
59 fps ∼55% -45%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
90 fps ∼83% -17%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
90 fps ∼83% -17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (60 - 108, n=2)
84 fps ∼78% -22%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8.2 - 143, n=204, last 2 years)
61.7 fps ∼57% -43%
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
132 fps ∼59%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
56 fps ∼25% -58%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
178 fps ∼79% +35%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
224 fps ∼100% +70%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
153 fps ∼68% +16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (132 - 134, n=2)
133 fps ∼59% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.3 - 417, n=204, last 2 years)
117 fps ∼52% -11%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
69 fps ∼78%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
33 fps ∼37% -52%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
60 fps ∼67% -13%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
89 fps ∼100% +29%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
79 fps ∼89% +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (59 - 69, n=2)
64 fps ∼72% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.5 - 120, n=202, last 2 years)
49.3 fps ∼55% -29%
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
77 fps ∼59%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
33 fps ∼25% -57%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
124 fps ∼95% +61%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
131 fps ∼100% +70%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
90 fps ∼69% +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (77 - 79, n=2)
78 fps ∼60% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 229, n=203, last 2 years)
68.1 fps ∼52% -12%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
49 fps ∼62%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
25 fps ∼32% -49%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
58 fps ∼73% +18%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
79 fps ∼100% +61%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
57 fps ∼72% +16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (49 - 50, n=2)
49.5 fps ∼63% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.1 - 106, n=201, last 2 years)
38.3 fps ∼48% -22%
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
56 fps ∼61%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
26 fps ∼28% -54%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
77 fps ∼84% +38%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
92 fps ∼100% +64%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
65 fps ∼71% +16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (56 - 57, n=2)
56.5 fps ∼61% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 151, n=201, last 2 years)
46.8 fps ∼51% -16%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
28 fps ∼60%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
16 fps ∼34% -43%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
41 fps ∼87% +46%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
47 fps ∼100% +68%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
35 fps ∼74% +25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (28 - 29, n=2)
28.5 fps ∼61% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.3 - 61, n=200, last 2 years)
24.1 fps ∼51% -14%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
33 fps ∼58%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
16 fps ∼28% -52%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
47 fps ∼82% +42%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
57 fps ∼100% +73%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
40 fps ∼70% +21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (33 - 33, n=2)
33 fps ∼58% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.8 - 96.6, n=200, last 2 years)
28.2 fps ∼49% -15%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
30 fps ∼61%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
18 fps ∼37% -40%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
48 fps ∼98% +60%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
49 fps ∼100% +63%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
42 fps ∼86% +40%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (30 - 31, n=2)
30.5 fps ∼62% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.5 - 73, n=267, last 2 years)
24.1 fps ∼49% -20%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
34 fps ∼60%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
20 fps ∼35% -41%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
54 fps ∼95% +59%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
57 fps ∼100% +68%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
50 fps ∼88% +47%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (34 - 35, n=2)
34.5 fps ∼61% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.95 - 257, n=267, last 2 years)
28.4 fps ∼50% -16%
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
19 fps ∼61%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
11 fps ∼35% -42%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
31 fps ∼100% +63%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
31 fps ∼100% +63%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
26 fps ∼84% +37%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (19 - 20, n=2)
19.5 fps ∼63% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 60, n=268, last 2 years)
16.2 fps ∼52% -15%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
13 fps ∼59%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
7.6 fps ∼35% -42%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
21 fps ∼95% +62%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
22 fps ∼100% +69%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
18 fps ∼82% +38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (13 - 13, n=2)
13 fps ∼59% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.35 - 101, n=268, last 2 years)
11 fps ∼50% -15%
Antutu v9 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
438254 Points ∼65%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
393060 Points ∼58% -10%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
604538 Points ∼89% +38%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
678958 Points ∼100% +55%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
521880 Points ∼77% +19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (438254 - 508662, n=2)
473458 Points ∼70% +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (121238 - 815441, n=58, last 2 years)
502616 Points ∼74% +15%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
422597 Points ∼72%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
334292 Points ∼57% -21%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
534286 Points ∼91% +26%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
588115 Points ∼100% +39%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
468196 Points ∼80% +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (422597 - 435272, n=2)
428935 Points ∼73% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53335 - 727247, n=178, last 2 years)
346046 Points ∼59% -18%
AImark - Score v2.x (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
139024 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
42629 Points ∼31% -69%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
71083 Points ∼51% -49%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
6472 Points ∼5% -95%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (139024 - 140376, n=2)
139700 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4293 - 273221, n=78, last 2 years)
69094 Points ∼49% -50%
Basemark GPU 1.2
1280x720 OpenGL Simple Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
327.47 fps ∼100%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
262.8 fps ∼80% -20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
 
327 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (38.8 - 537, n=15, last 2 years)
228 fps ∼70% -30%
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
48.57 fps ∼60%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
63.4 fps ∼79% +31%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
80.6 fps ∼100% +66%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
54.98 (26.87min - 84.59max) fps ∼68% +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (48.6 - 49.6, n=2)
49.1 fps ∼61% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.7 - 1902, n=49, last 2 years)
76.3 fps ∼95% +57%
OpenGL Medium Native (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
43.27 fps ∼63%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
62.3 fps ∼90% +44%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
68.5 fps ∼99% +58%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
49.69 (25.09min - 83.87max) fps ∼72% +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (43.3 - 44.6, n=2)
43.9 fps ∼64% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5 - 1736, n=48, last 2 years)
69 fps ∼100% +59%
1280x720 Vulkan Simple Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
322.06 fps ∼62%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
221.6 fps ∼43% -31%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
517.72 fps ∼100% +61%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
327.65 (128.58min - 2098.43max) fps ∼63% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (315 - 322, n=2)
318 fps ∼61% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (36.2 - 2982, n=43, last 2 years)
302 fps ∼58% -6%
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
45.96 fps ∼59%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
71.3 fps ∼91% +55%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
74.19 fps ∼95% +61%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
47.98 (24.754min - 71.53max) fps ∼61% +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (46 - 46.9, n=2)
46.4 fps ∼59% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8.79 - 1962, n=47, last 2 years)
78.4 fps ∼100% +71%
Vulkan Medium Native (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
39.55 fps ∼58%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
63.7 fps ∼94% +61%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
63.85 fps ∼94% +61%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
52.56 (25.32min - 86.8max) fps ∼77% +33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (39.6 - 41.4, n=2)
40.5 fps ∼59% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10.5 - 1746, n=47, last 2 years)
68.1 fps ∼100% +72%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
4349 Points ∼74%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3459 Points ∼58% -20%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
5130 Points ∼87% +18%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
5916 Points ∼100% +36%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
5068 Points ∼86% +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (4349 - 4772, n=2)
4561 Points ∼77% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (615 - 7123, n=189, last 2 years)
3806 Points ∼64% -12%
System (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
9089 Points ∼94%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
6242 Points ∼64% -31%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
9622 Points ∼99% +6%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
8852 Points ∼91% -3%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
9557 Points ∼98% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (9089 - 10333, n=2)
9711 Points ∼100% +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1160 - 11774, n=189, last 2 years)
6883 Points ∼71% -24%
Memory (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
4269 Points ∼59%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
4211 Points ∼58% -1%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
7277 Points ∼100% +70%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
6757 Points ∼93% +58%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
6172 Points ∼85% +45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (4269 - 5425, n=2)
4847 Points ∼67% +14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (522 - 9044, n=189, last 2 years)
4527 Points ∼62% +6%
Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
6783 Points ∼59%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3989 Points ∼35% -41%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
7754 Points ∼68% +14%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
11431 Points ∼100% +69%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
7202 Points ∼63% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (6681 - 6783, n=2)
6732 Points ∼59% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (349 - 15739, n=189, last 2 years)
5945 Points ∼52% -12%
Web (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
1359 Points ∼76%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1365 Points ∼76% 0%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
1276 Points ∼71% -6%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
1791 Points ∼100% +32%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
1563 Points ∼87% +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (1359 - 1385, n=2)
1372 Points ∼77% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10 - 2169, n=189, last 2 years)
1302 Points ∼73% -4%

尽管有快速的SoC,三星Galaxy A52s 5G在浏览互联网时只能在中场占有一席之地。在日常使用中,在滚动时,你有时不得不等待图片的加载。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Motorola Moto G100 (Chrome 90)
91.208 Points ∼100% +27%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G (Chrome90)
75.831 Points ∼83% +6%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G (Chrome 93)
71.757 Points ∼79%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G (68 - 71.8, n=2)
69.9 Points ∼77% -3%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G (Chrome 89)
56.483 Points ∼62% -21%
Average of class Smartphone (12.4 - 182, n=177, last 2 years)
52.7 Points ∼58% -27%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G (Chrome 92)
51.066 Points ∼56% -29%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Motorola Moto G100 (Chrome 90)
160.92 Points ∼100% +36%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G (Chrome90)
135.67 Points ∼84% +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G (118 - 134, n=2)
126 Points ∼78% +7%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G (Chrome 93)
118.13 Points ∼73%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G (Chrome 92)
108.77 Points ∼68% -8%
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 414, n=187, last 2 years)
95.6 Points ∼59% -19%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G (Chrome 89)
92.34 Points ∼57% -22%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Motorola Moto G100 (Chome 90)
73.6 runs/min ∼100% +38%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G (Chrome90)
70.8 runs/min ∼96% +33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G (53.2 - 55, n=2)
54.1 runs/min ∼74% +2%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G (Chome 93)
53.23 runs/min ∼72%
Average of class Smartphone (9 - 244, n=163, last 2 years)
52.2 runs/min ∼71% -2%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G (Chome 92)
50.2 runs/min ∼68% -6%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G (Chrome 89)
45.44 runs/min ∼62% -15%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Motorola Moto G100 (Chrome 90)
147 Points ∼100% +37%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G (Chrome 93)
107 Points ∼73%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G (Chrome90)
106 Points ∼72% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G (93 - 107, n=2)
100 Points ∼68% -7%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G (Chrome 89)
82 Points ∼56% -23%
Average of class Smartphone (20 - 252, n=193, last 2 years)
80.9 Points ∼55% -24%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G (Chrome 92)
69 Points ∼47% -36%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Motorola Moto G100 (Chrome 90)
34161 Points ∼100% +36%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G (Chrome90)
26943 Points ∼79% +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G (25119 - 28221, n=2)
26670 Points ∼78% +6%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G (Chrome 92)
26207 Points ∼77% +4%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G (Chrome 93)
25119 Points ∼74%
Average of class Smartphone (1986 - 64222, n=201, last 2 years)
18720 Points ∼55% -25%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G (Chrome 89)
17730 Points ∼52% -29%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (414 - 29635, n=203, last 2 years)
3764 ms * ∼100% -109%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G (Chrome 89)
2393.3 ms * ∼64% -33%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G (Chrome 92)
1808.9 ms * ∼48% -0%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G (Chrome90)
1802.32 ms * ∼48% -0%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G (Chrome 93)
1802.2 ms * ∼48%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G (1405 - 1802, n=2)
1604 ms * ∼43% +11%
Motorola Moto G100 (Chrome 90)
1589.3 ms * ∼42% +12%

* ... smaller is better

该设备的UFS 2.1存储已经不完全是最新的了。UFS 3.0或UFS 3.1存储现在已经成为这个价格范围内的标准。速度上的差异在基准测试中是很明显的,但可能只有在日常使用中数据量较大时才会明显。

Samsung Galaxy A52s 5GSamsung Galaxy A52 5GOnePlus Nord 2 5GMotorola Moto G100Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5GAverage 128 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-1%
77%
53%
19%
-29%
-22%
Sequential Read 256KB
951
926.67
-3%
1827
92%
1729.8
82%
949.43
0%
772 ?(427 - 999, n=89)
-19%
807 ?(41.9 - 2037, n=273, last 2 years)
-15%
Sequential Write 256KB
486.5
484.62
0%
1256.4
158%
716.8
47%
710.31
46%
267 ?(13.6 - 707, n=89)
-45%
365 ?(11.9 - 1321, n=273, last 2 years)
-25%
Random Read 4KB
168.2
176.05
5%
223.7
33%
253.6
51%
207.95
24%
147 ?(92.6 - 239, n=89)
-13%
142 ?(13.5 - 325, n=273, last 2 years)
-16%
Random Write 4KB
192.5
179.23
-7%
239
24%
252.9
31%
206.89
7%
122 ?(18.2 - 290, n=89)
-37%
132 ?(5.5 - 330, n=273, last 2 years)
-31%

游戏--在Galaxy A52s上快速游戏

在全速120赫兹下进行游戏几乎是不可能的。在快速2D射击游戏Armajet中,性能足以能够达到每秒100帧左右。在PUBG Mobile中,当你降低设置时,至少60帧还是可能的。在30帧的情况下也可以毫无问题地进行游戏,但不像在更高的帧率下那样流畅。对于动作游戏的高要求玩家来说,每一帧允许的反应都很重要。我们用 GameBench的工具测量了帧率

触摸屏和位置传感器是准确的,很适合控制游戏。

氩氦刀
氩氦刀
沥青9
沥青9
PUBG手机版
PUBG手机版
01020304050607080901001108592117118109105101104889910410094891041059695919086888391788995971059910810810710410496918810193909386991019510210510710310310110091798582959292103102101939983110108109102108103111889090849610210810910810885921171181091051011048899104100948910410596959190868883917889959710599108108107104104969188101939093869910195102105107103103101100917985829592921031021019399831101081091021081031118890908496102108109108108303030303029303130303030253030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303085921171181091051011048899104100948910410596959190868883917889959710599108108107104104969188101939093869910195102105107103103101100917985829592921031021019399831101081091021081031118890908496102108109108108303030303029303130303030253030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030292430302931303029303030313030293030303130303030303029303031293031859211711810910510110488991041009489104105969591908688839178899597105991081081071041049691881019390938699101951021051071031031011009179858295929210310210193998311010810910210810311188909084961021081091081083030303030293031303030302530303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030302924303029313030293030303130302930303031303030303030293030312930315956595855585756606060596059606060606060596059615860606060595959606060606060606060605961596060606160605960606060605960595985921171181091051011048899104100948910410596959190868883917889959710599108108107104104969188101939093869910195102105107103103101100917985829592921031021019399831101081091021081031118890908496102108109108108303030303029303130303030253030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030292430302931303029303030313030293030303130303030303029303031293031595659585558575660606059605960606060606059605961586060606059595960606060606060606060596159606060616060596060606060596059594039374140404040404040404040404039403740404040404040404040404040403940394040403940404041394040414039404038404040404039404040404040Tooltip
; Armajet; 1.61.6: Ø97.7 (78-118)
; Asphalt 9: Legends; Standard / low; 3.1.2a: Ø29.9 (25-31)
; Asphalt 9: Legends; High Quality; 3.1.2a: Ø29.8 (24-31)
; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 1.6.0: Ø59.4 (55-61)
; PUBG Mobile; HD; 1.6.0: Ø39.8 (37-41)

排放--热门竞争者

温度

3DMark Wild Life压力测试
3DMark Wild Life压力测试
3DMark Wild Life Extreme压力测试
3DMark Wild Life Extreme压力测试

我们几乎无法检测到Galaxy A52 5G长时间负载后的温度上升,但我们的评测样品的后继者肯定会变热。我们在机箱上测量到高达45.4°C(约114°F)的温度,这绝对是明显的,在更高的环境温度下也可能变得不舒服。

另一方面,性能并没有因此受到影响。即使经过长时间的负载,Galaxy ,手机的性能仍然与开始时类似。