Notebookcheck

苹果 iPad Pro 10.5 平板电脑简短评测

Daniel Schmidt (translated by Kangfei Zheng), 07/02/2017
Apple iPad Pro Tablet Touchscreen

优秀平板,并非专业。 iPad Pro 10.5是苹果的Pro系列的第二代。屏幕绝对是最亮眼的明星。它不仅尺寸大,还提供了120 Hz,HDR,并宣称覆盖了的P3色彩空间。平板电脑采用A10X系统芯片,但仍然不会是令人满意的笔记本替代品。

Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017 (iPad Pro Series)
Processor
Apple A10X Fusion
Graphics adapter
Apple A10X Fusion GPU / PowerVR
Memory
4096 MB 
, LPDDR4, 1.600 MHz
Display
10.5 inch 4:3, 2224x1668 pixel 265 PPI, 电容式触控屏, native pen support, IPS, glossy: yes
Storage
Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND , 64 GB 
, 51.32 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 HDMI, Audio Connections: 3.5 毫米耳麦接口, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Touch ID, 3 axis gyro and acceleration sensor, barometer, digital compass, Smart Connector
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM/GPRS/EDGE (850, 900, 1.800, 1.900 MHz), UMTS/HSPA+ (850, 900, 1.700/2.100, 1.900, 2.100 MHz), CDMA EV-DO Rev. A+B (800, 1.900 MHz), LTE Cat. 9 (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 11, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41), LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 6.1 x 250.6 x 174.1
Battery
30.8 Wh, 8134 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 3,77 V, Battery runtime (according to manufacturer): 10 h
Operating System
Apple iOS 10
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix (f/1.8, 5x digital zoom, OIS, auto HDR, UHD-video)
Secondary Camera: 7 MPix (f/2.2, auto HDR, 1080p-video)
Additional features
Speakers: 4扬声器, Keyboard: 虚拟键盘, lightning cable, modular power adapter, Quick-Start Guide, security warnings and warranty information, 12 Months Warranty, lightning port, fanless
Weight
469 g, Power Supply: 99 g
Price
889 Euro

 

Apple iPad Pro 10.5 (front) and Apple iPad 12.9 (2017)
Apple iPad Pro 10.5
Apple iPad Pro 10.5
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 - Touch ID
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 - SIM tool
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 - Nano-SIM slot
Apple iPad Pro 10.5
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 - camera
Apple iPad Pro 10.5

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
615 MBit/s ∼100% +16%
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
528 MBit/s ∼86%
Huawei MediaPad T3 10
Adreno 308, 425, 16 GB eMMC Flash
122 MBit/s ∼20% -77%
Asus ZenPad 3S 10 Z500KL
Adreno 510, 650 MSM8956, 32 GB eMMC Flash
33.4 MBit/s ∼5% -94%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
569 MBit/s ∼100% +14%
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
497 MBit/s ∼87%
Huawei MediaPad T3 10
Adreno 308, 425, 16 GB eMMC Flash
112 MBit/s ∼20% -77%
Asus ZenPad 3S 10 Z500KL
Adreno 510, 650 MSM8956, 32 GB eMMC Flash
37.6 MBit/s ∼7% -92%

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
The iPad Pro 10.5 without (left) and with (right) the True Tone function activated.
The iPad Pro 10.5 without (left) and with (right) the True Tone function activated.
634
cd/m²
627
cd/m²
617
cd/m²
665
cd/m²
634
cd/m²
610
cd/m²
651
cd/m²
610
cd/m²
580
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 665 cd/m² Average: 625.3 cd/m² Minimum: 2.81 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 634 cd/m²
Contrast: 1626:1 (Black: 0.39 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.9 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 2.8 | - Ø
Gamma: 2.26
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
IPS, 2224x1668, 10.5
Apple iPad Pro 9.7
IPS, 2048x1536, 9.7
Apple iPad (2017)
IPS, 2048x1536, 9.7
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Super AMOLED, 2048x1526, 9.7
Huawei MediaPad T3 10
IPS, 1280x800, 9.6
Asus ZenPad 3S 10 Z500KL
IPS, 2048x1536, 9.7
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F
IPS, 1920x1080, 10.1
Screen
1%
-3%
8%
-23%
-32%
-40%
Brightness
625
500
-20%
485
-22%
468
-25%
409
-35%
457
-27%
421
-33%
Brightness Distribution
87
93
7%
88
1%
82
-6%
92
6%
88
1%
86
-1%
Black Level *
0.39
0.52
-33%
0.46
-18%
0.32
18%
0.25
36%
0.32
18%
Contrast
1626
1006
-38%
1117
-31%
1281
-21%
1944
20%
1403
-14%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
1.9
1.1
42%
1.4
26%
1.8
5%
4.5
-137%
5.2
-174%
4.7
-147%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.8
1.4
50%
2.1
25%
1.2
57%
2
29%
4.1
-46%
4.5
-61%
Gamma
2.26 106%
2.11 114%
2.22 108%
2.11 114%
2.17 111%
2.73 88%
2.22 108%
CCT
7027 93%
6662 98%
6647 98%
6500 100%
6930 94%
6579 99%
7122 91%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
62.97
82.32
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.55
99.06

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 54 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8568 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
17.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6 ms rise
↘ 11.6 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 11 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (26.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
39.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 19.2 ms rise
↘ 20.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 42 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (42.5 ms).
AnTuTu Benchmark v6 - Total Score
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
217439 Points ∼95%
HTC U11
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
175032 Points ∼77% -20%
Apple iPad Pro 9.7
A9X / PowerVR GT7xxx, A9X, Apple 256 GB (iPad Pro 9.7 NVMe)
168840 Points ∼74% -22%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
144426 Points ∼63% -34%
Apple iPad (2017)
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 128 GB NVMe
128706 Points ∼56% -41%
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F
HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Z8550, 64 GB eMMC Flash
88989 Points ∼39% -59%
Asus ZenPad 3S 10 Z500KL
Adreno 510, 650 MSM8956, 32 GB eMMC Flash
77540 Points ∼34% -64%
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
9358 Points ∼37%
HTC U11
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
6443 Points ∼26% -31%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
4187 Points ∼17% -55%
Asus ZenPad 3S 10 Z500KL
Adreno 510, 650 MSM8956, 32 GB eMMC Flash
2869 Points ∼11% -69%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
3933 Points ∼66%
HTC U11
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1906 Points ∼32% -52%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1745 Points ∼29% -56%
Asus ZenPad 3S 10 Z500KL
Adreno 510, 650 MSM8956, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1458 Points ∼25% -63%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
HTC U11
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3085 Points ∼100% +52%
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
2036 Points ∼66%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1754 Points ∼57% -14%
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F
HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Z8550, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1520 Points ∼49% -25%
Apple iPad (2017)
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 128 GB NVMe
1094 Points ∼35% -46%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
5459 Points ∼78%
HTC U11
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3324 Points ∼48% -39%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
3196 Points ∼46% -41%
Apple iPad (2017)
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 128 GB NVMe
2651 Points ∼38% -51%
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F
HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Z8550, 64 GB eMMC Flash
977 Points ∼14% -82%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
3975 Points ∼78%
HTC U11
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3268 Points ∼64% -18%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
2702 Points ∼53% -32%
Apple iPad (2017)
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 128 GB NVMe
2015 Points ∼40% -49%
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F
HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Z8550, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1180 Points ∼23% -70%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
HTC U11
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2841 Points ∼92% +40%
Apple iPad Pro 9.7
A9X / PowerVR GT7xxx, A9X, Apple 256 GB (iPad Pro 9.7 NVMe)
2030 Points ∼66% 0%
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
2027 Points ∼66%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1798 Points ∼58% -11%
Asus ZenPad 3S 10 Z500KL
Adreno 510, 650 MSM8956, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1532 Points ∼50% -24%
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F
HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Z8550, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1499 Points ∼49% -26%
Apple iPad (2017)
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 128 GB NVMe
1098 Points ∼36% -46%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
4537 Points ∼84%
Apple iPad Pro 9.7
A9X / PowerVR GT7xxx, A9X, Apple 256 GB (iPad Pro 9.7 NVMe)
4107 Points ∼76% -9%
HTC U11
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3883 Points ∼72% -14%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
2943 Points ∼55% -35%
Apple iPad (2017)
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 128 GB NVMe
2519 Points ∼47% -44%
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F
HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Z8550, 64 GB eMMC Flash
967 Points ∼18% -79%
Asus ZenPad 3S 10 Z500KL
Adreno 510, 650 MSM8956, 32 GB eMMC Flash
782 Points ∼15% -83%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
HTC U11
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3590 Points ∼92% +1%
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
3558 Points ∼92%
Apple iPad Pro 9.7
A9X / PowerVR GT7xxx, A9X, Apple 256 GB (iPad Pro 9.7 NVMe)
3346 Points ∼86% -6%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
2578 Points ∼66% -28%
Apple iPad (2017)
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 128 GB NVMe
1957 Points ∼50% -45%
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F
HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Z8550, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1050 Points ∼27% -70%
Asus ZenPad 3S 10 Z500KL
Adreno 510, 650 MSM8956, 32 GB eMMC Flash
878 Points ∼23% -75%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics
HTC U11
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2832 Points ∼92% +44%
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
1960 Points ∼64%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1811 Points ∼59% -8%
Apple iPad Pro 9.7
A9X / PowerVR GT7xxx, A9X, Apple 256 GB (iPad Pro 9.7 NVMe)
1807 Points ∼59% -8%
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F
HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Z8550, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1643 Points ∼53% -16%
Asus ZenPad 3S 10 Z500KL
Adreno 510, 650 MSM8956, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1539 Points ∼50% -21%
Apple iPad (2017)
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 128 GB NVMe
1074 Points ∼35% -45%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
7212 Points ∼93%
Apple iPad Pro 9.7
A9X / PowerVR GT7xxx, A9X, Apple 256 GB (iPad Pro 9.7 NVMe)
6127 Points ∼79% -15%
HTC U11
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
5877 Points ∼76% -19%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
4626 Points ∼60% -36%
Apple iPad (2017)
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 128 GB NVMe
4320 Points ∼56% -40%
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F
HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Z8550, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1431 Points ∼19% -80%
Asus ZenPad 3S 10 Z500KL
Adreno 510, 650 MSM8956, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1304 Points ∼17% -82%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0
HTC U11
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
4744 Points ∼95% +5%
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
4521 Points ∼91%
Apple iPad Pro 9.7
A9X / PowerVR GT7xxx, A9X, Apple 256 GB (iPad Pro 9.7 NVMe)
4002 Points ∼80% -11%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
3438 Points ∼69% -24%
Apple iPad (2017)
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 128 GB NVMe
2584 Points ∼52% -43%
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F
HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Z8550, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1473 Points ∼30% -67%
Asus ZenPad 3S 10 Z500KL
Adreno 510, 650 MSM8956, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1350 Points ∼27% -70%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
21886 Points ∼30% +12%
HTC U11
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
20140 Points ∼28% +3%
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
19534 Points ∼27%
Apple iPad Pro 9.7
A9X / PowerVR GT7xxx, A9X, Apple 256 GB (iPad Pro 9.7 NVMe)
16023 Points ∼22% -18%
Apple iPad (2017)
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 128 GB NVMe
13324 Points ∼19% -32%
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F
HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Z8550, 64 GB eMMC Flash
13056 Points ∼18% -33%
Asus ZenPad 3S 10 Z500KL
Adreno 510, 650 MSM8956, 32 GB eMMC Flash
11515 Points ∼16% -41%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
110148 Points ∼24%
HTC U11
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
55725 Points ∼12% -49%
Apple iPad Pro 9.7
A9X / PowerVR GT7xxx, A9X, Apple 256 GB (iPad Pro 9.7 NVMe)
50084 Points ∼11% -55%
Apple iPad (2017)
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 128 GB NVMe
44645 Points ∼10% -59%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
34002 Points ∼7% -69%
Asus ZenPad 3S 10 Z500KL
Adreno 510, 650 MSM8956, 32 GB eMMC Flash
22041 Points ∼5% -80%
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F
HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Z8550, 64 GB eMMC Flash
18258 Points ∼4% -83%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
54237 Points ∼28%
HTC U11
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
40014 Points ∼20% -26%
Apple iPad Pro 9.7
A9X / PowerVR GT7xxx, A9X, Apple 256 GB (iPad Pro 9.7 NVMe)
34015 Points ∼17% -37%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
30277 Points ∼15% -44%
Apple iPad (2017)
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 128 GB NVMe
29326 Points ∼15% -46%
Asus ZenPad 3S 10 Z500KL
Adreno 510, 650 MSM8956, 32 GB eMMC Flash
18320 Points ∼9% -66%
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F
HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Z8550, 64 GB eMMC Flash
16773 Points ∼9% -69%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
225 fps ∼16%
Apple iPad Pro 9.7
A9X / PowerVR GT7xxx, A9X, Apple 256 GB (iPad Pro 9.7 NVMe)
117.1 fps ∼9% -48%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
92 fps ∼7% -59%
HTC U11
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
91 fps ∼7% -60%
Apple iPad (2017)
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 128 GB NVMe
80.8 fps ∼6% -64%
Asus ZenPad 3S 10 Z500KL
Adreno 510, 650 MSM8956, 32 GB eMMC Flash
32 fps ∼2% -86%
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F
HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Z8550, 64 GB eMMC Flash
31 fps ∼2% -86%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16
Apple iPad Pro 9.7
A9X / PowerVR GT7xxx, A9X, Apple 256 GB (iPad Pro 9.7 NVMe)
59.4 fps ∼13% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
59 fps ∼13% 0%
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
59 fps ∼13%
HTC U11
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
58 fps ∼13% -2%
Apple iPad (2017)
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 128 GB NVMe
56 fps ∼12% -5%
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F
HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Z8550, 64 GB eMMC Flash
31 fps ∼7% -47%
Asus ZenPad 3S 10 Z500KL
Adreno 510, 650 MSM8956, 32 GB eMMC Flash
25 fps ∼5% -58%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
109 fps ∼20%
Apple iPad Pro 9.7
A9X / PowerVR GT7xxx, A9X, Apple 256 GB (iPad Pro 9.7 NVMe)
51 fps ∼9% -53%
HTC U11
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
51 fps ∼9% -53%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
48 fps ∼9% -56%
Apple iPad (2017)
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 128 GB NVMe
40.6 fps ∼7% -63%
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F
HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Z8550, 64 GB eMMC Flash
14 fps ∼3% -87%
Asus ZenPad 3S 10 Z500KL
Adreno 510, 650 MSM8956, 32 GB eMMC Flash
14 fps ∼3% -87%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
58 fps ∼16%
Apple iPad Pro 9.7
A9X / PowerVR GT7xxx, A9X, Apple 256 GB (iPad Pro 9.7 NVMe)
35.1 fps ∼10% -39%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
34 fps ∼9% -41%
HTC U11
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
29 fps ∼8% -50%
Apple iPad (2017)
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 128 GB NVMe
28.7 fps ∼8% -51%
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F
HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Z8550, 64 GB eMMC Flash
15 fps ∼4% -74%
Asus ZenPad 3S 10 Z500KL
Adreno 510, 650 MSM8956, 32 GB eMMC Flash
9.6 fps ∼3% -83%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
63 fps ∼15%
Apple iPad Pro 9.7
A9X / PowerVR GT7xxx, A9X, Apple 256 GB (iPad Pro 9.7 NVMe)
39.5 fps ∼9% -37%
HTC U11
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
33 fps ∼8% -48%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
32 fps ∼8% -49%
Apple iPad (2017)
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 128 GB NVMe
28.5 fps ∼7% -55%
Asus ZenPad 3S 10 Z500KL
Adreno 510, 650 MSM8956, 32 GB eMMC Flash
9.5 fps ∼2% -85%
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F
HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Z8550, 64 GB eMMC Flash
7.2 fps ∼2% -89%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
43 fps ∼24%
Apple iPad Pro 9.7
A9X / PowerVR GT7xxx, A9X, Apple 256 GB (iPad Pro 9.7 NVMe)
26.9 fps ∼15% -37%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
19 fps ∼11% -56%
Apple iPad (2017)
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 128 GB NVMe
18.5 fps ∼11% -57%
HTC U11
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
15 fps ∼9% -65%
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F
HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Z8550, 64 GB eMMC Flash
7 fps ∼4% -84%
Asus ZenPad 3S 10 Z500KL
Adreno 510, 650 MSM8956, 32 GB eMMC Flash
5.6 fps ∼3% -87%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
30333 Points ∼61%
Apple iPad Pro 9.7
A9X / PowerVR GT7xxx, A9X, Apple 256 GB (iPad Pro 9.7 NVMe)
19621 Points ∼40% -35%
Apple iPad (2017)
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 128 GB NVMe
18148 Points ∼37% -40%
HTC U11
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
11781 Points ∼24% -61%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
9531 Points ∼19% -69%
Asus ZenPad 3S 10 Z500KL
Adreno 510, 650 MSM8956, 32 GB eMMC Flash
8167 Points ∼16% -73%
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F
HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Z8550, 64 GB eMMC Flash
8060 Points ∼16% -73%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
257 Points ∼34%
Apple iPad Pro 9.7
A9X / PowerVR GT7xxx, A9X, Apple 256 GB (iPad Pro 9.7 NVMe)
225 Points ∼30% -12%
Apple iPad (2017)
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 128 GB NVMe
205 Points ∼27% -20%
HTC U11
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
162 Points ∼22% -37%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
132 Points ∼18% -49%
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F
HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Z8550, 64 GB eMMC Flash
115 Points ∼15% -55%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F
HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Z8550, 64 GB eMMC Flash
4419 ms * ∼7% -354%
Asus ZenPad 3S 10 Z500KL
Adreno 510, 650 MSM8956, 32 GB eMMC Flash
3323.5 ms * ∼6% -242%
HTC U11
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2760.3 ms * ∼5% -184%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
2244.4 ms * ∼4% -131%
Apple iPad Pro 9.7
A9X / PowerVR GT7xxx, A9X, Apple 256 GB (iPad Pro 9.7 NVMe)
1546.3 ms * ∼3% -59%
Apple iPad (2017)
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 128 GB NVMe
1457.7 ms * ∼2% -50%
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
972.7 ms * ∼2%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
200.59 Points ∼0%
Apple iPad Pro 9.7
A9X / PowerVR GT7xxx, A9X, Apple 256 GB (iPad Pro 9.7 NVMe)
143 Points ∼0% -29%
Apple iPad (2017)
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 128 GB NVMe
128.6 Points ∼0% -36%
HTC U11
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
69.51 Points ∼0% -65%
Asus ZenPad 3S 10 Z500KL
Adreno 510, 650 MSM8956, 32 GB eMMC Flash
51.72 Points ∼0% -74%
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F
HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Z8550, 64 GB eMMC Flash
44.84 Points ∼0% -78%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
42.73 Points ∼0% -79%

* ... smaller is better

Max. Load
 34.5 °C35.5 °C40.8 °C 
 34.2 °C36.4 °C40.6 °C 
 33.4 °C35.3 °C40.3 °C 
Maximum: 40.8 °C
Average: 36.8 °C
35.2 °C35.3 °C34 °C
35 °C35.8 °C34.3 °C
34.7 °C34.9 °C33.2 °C
Maximum: 35.8 °C
Average: 34.7 °C
Power Supply (max.)  51.4 °C | Room Temperature 21.6 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
Apple iPad Pro 10.5: heat image
Apple iPad Pro 10.5: heat image
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.641.12525.436.93125.335.84032.934.55033.630.76331.632.18028.429.91002742.512520.850.11602253.220021.357.525020.863.931521.265.240019.465.850019.567.263017.769.180017.967.3100017.872.6125017.375.7160017.477.9200016.777.7250017.274.4315018.275.1400017.970.7500017.667.9630017.763.9800017.855.91000017.956.41250018.158.81600018.260.9SPL3084.6N1.359.1median 17.9Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017median 65.8Delta1.37.531.639.825.430.725.330.632.933.533.632.231.630.328.425.92726.620.826.82236.221.346.320.861.321.27219.475.319.573.817.780.817.980.517.879.217.373.417.474.116.77217.268.518.267.717.970.717.672.817.76917.873.517.970.318.167.718.264.43086.51.371median 17.9Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825median 70.71.38.331.637.525.435.825.330.832.927.833.632.531.630.428.429.52726.220.833.32243.521.352.920.856.521.263.919.468.119.570.317.772.817.976.517.876.917.374.817.473.916.772.417.272.618.275.517.97717.675.417.768.717.863.917.960.518.158.418.257.13085.91.365.9median 17.9Asus ZenPad 3S 10 Z500KLmedian 68.71.38.8hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.8% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 33%
Compared to all devices tested
» 17% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.51 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 26% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 33%
Compared to all devices tested
» 33% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Asus ZenPad 3S 10 Z500KL audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 38% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 59% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 33%
Compared to all devices tested
» 41% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.02 / 0.2 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.44 / 6.12 / 6.14 Watt
Load midlight 8.55 / 10.62 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
8134 mAh
Apple iPad Pro 9.7
7306 mAh
Google Pixel C
 mAh
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F
8500 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
6000 mAh
Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro
6600 mAh
Power Consumption
-16%
-3%
0%
18%
19%
Idle Minimum *
1.44
1.71
-19%
1.82
-26%
2.19
-52%
2.08
-44%
1.58
-10%
Idle Average *
6.12
7.55
-23%
4.26
30%
4.3
30%
3.5
43%
4.12
33%
Idle Maximum *
6.14
7.62
-24%
4.33
29%
4.37
29%
3.58
42%
4.15
32%
Load Average *
8.55
8.39
2%
9.82
-15%
8.62
-1%
6.97
18%
6.2
27%
Load Maximum *
10.62
12.08
-14%
13.99
-32%
11.26
-6%
7.4
30%
9.27
13%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
33h 56min
WiFi Surfing v1.3
11h 33min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
10h 29min
Load (maximum brightness)
3h 19min
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
8134 mAh
Apple iPad Pro 9.7
7306 mAh
Apple iPad (2017)
 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
6000 mAh
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F
8500 mAh
Google Pixel C
 mAh
Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro
6600 mAh
Asus ZenPad 3S 10 Z500KL
7800 mAh
Battery Runtime
2%
8%
20%
2%
15%
-15%
-16%
Reader / Idle
2036
1850
-9%
1496
-27%
1903
-7%
1985
-3%
2090
3%
1230
-40%
H.264
629
708
13%
845
34%
551
-12%
702
12%
740
18%
593
-6%
WiFi v1.3
693
779
12%
764
10%
760
10%
602
-13%
638
-8%
416
-40%
579
-16%
Load
199
186
-7%
225
13%
375
88%
222
12%
294
48%
248
25%

Pros

+ 非常好的显示效果
+ 快速Wi-Fi
+ 可使用SIM卡(仅限LTE版本)
+ 快速的系统芯片
+ 优秀的扬声器
+ 良好的电池续航时间

Cons

- 不支持伽利略全球导航系统
- 机身对压力敏感
- 一年保修
- 尽管声称支持,但是却不支持P3
- 比前上一代存储速度慢
- 充电时间长
Review: Apple iPad Pro 10.5
Review: Apple iPad Pro 10.5

苹果没有对iPad Pro 10.5进行全面的改造,而是在最重要的地方做出了真正的改进。特别是新的显示器,它令人印象深刻——其强大的显示性能和HDR功能,将吸引那些对电影、电视剧和游戏感兴趣的用户。可惜,我们无法测量到其宣传的P3颜色空间覆盖,只有较小的sRGB颜色空间。

该平板电脑具有高质量的通信模块,但仍然不支持欧洲GNSS定位系统。苹果也试图在内存上节约成本,这使得它比上一代慢。好在,在日常使用中并不明显。

Apple iPad Pro 10.5的许多小细节都得到了改进,这绝对是当前最好的平板电脑之一。

总的来说,苹果公司已经创造出了一个优秀的产品,并为平板电脑设置了很高的标准。它唯一的对手是三星的 Galaxy Tab S3,不过后者的系统芯片更老而且存储空间较少。iPad Pro的存储容量有所增加,起步价为649美元。最小的规格(64 GB) 低大部分用户来说也已经足够。尤其是在视频音频内容都是在线获取的今天。我们认为256 GB 的规格是最具性价比的,甚至比同等容量的前代还便宜。512GB规格则适合那些想要离线查看自己的多媒体文件的用户,或者需要离线标记视频查看相片的用户。

iPad Pro 10.5具有如此出色的性能,甚至可以考虑将其用作完整的笔记本电脑替代品。无论是用来编辑超高清视频,还是通过Adobe Lightroom进行图像处理,iPad Pro 10.5都能快速有效地运行。尽管我们觉得智能键盘的灵活性不够,只能在硬桌面上运行良好。Safari浏览器对CMS和其他基于Web的复杂应用程序的支持问题令人烦恼。文件管理太死板。因此,我们认为iPad Pro是一款很棒的平板电脑,但不能替代笔记本电脑。

 注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里

 

 

Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017 - 06/26/2017 v6
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis
88%
Keyboard
77 / 80 → 96%
Pointing Device
96%
Connectivity
49 / 65 → 76%
Weight
84 / 88 → 91%
Battery
93%
Display
91%
Games Performance
71 / 68 → 100%
Application Performance
80 / 76 → 100%
Temperature
88%
Noise
100%
Audio
73 / 91 → 80%
Camera
81 / 85 → 95%
Average
82%
92%
Tablet - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 苹果 iPad Pro 10.5 平板电脑简短评测
Daniel Schmidt, 2017-07- 2 (Update: 2017-07- 2)