Notebookcheck

三星 Galaxy Tab S3 平板电脑简短评测

Daniel Schmidt (translated by Kangfei Zheng), 05/08/2017
Android Tablet Touchscreen

全能王。 距离三星上次升级平板电脑已经有一段时间了。我们迫不及待想看到配备了S触控笔的新设备。该平板电脑能说服我们购买它,但是三星却没能在各个方面实现曾经的诺言。

Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 (Galaxy Tab S Series)
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 530, Core: 624 MHz
Memory
4096 MB 
Display
9.7 inch 4:3, 2048x1526 pixel 263 PPI, 电容式触摸屏, native pen support, Super AMOLED, HDR, glossy: yes
Storage
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 23.1 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, Audio Connections: 耳麦二合一 (3.5 mm), Card Reader: microSD 高达 256 GB, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 加速度计,位置,旋转,色谱,霍尔,G传感器, BeiDou, Galileo, Wifi Direct, Ant+
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM/GPRS/Edge (850, 900, 1800 and 1900 MHz), UMTS/HSPA+ (AWS (B4), 850, 900, 1900 and 2100 MHz), LTE Cat. 6 (band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 17, 20, 28 and 40), LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 6.0 x 237.3 x 169
Battery
6000 mAh Lithium-Ion, Quick Charge 3.0, Battery runtime (according to manufacturer): 12 h
Operating System
Android 7.0 Nougat
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: 4 立体声扬声器, Keyboard: 触屏, Keyboard Light: yes, 电源适配器, USB 线, S 触控笔, Samsung Smart Switch, Samsung Notes, Air Command, Samsung Flow, 24 Months Warranty, USB Type-C (3.1 Gen. 1), body SAR: 0.993 W/kg, fanless
Weight
434 g
Price
769 Euro

 

Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 LTE
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 LTE
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 LTE
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 LTE
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 LTE
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 LTE
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 LTE
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 LTE
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 LTE
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 LTE
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 LTE
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 LTE
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 LTE
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 LTE

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
615 MBit/s ∼100%
Apple iPad (2017)
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 128 GB NVMe
465 MBit/s ∼76% -24%
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
PowerVR GX6250, MT8176, 64 GB eMMC Flash
254 MBit/s ∼41% -59%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
209 MBit/s ∼34% -66%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
569 MBit/s ∼100%
Apple iPad (2017)
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 128 GB NVMe
389 MBit/s ∼68% -32%
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
PowerVR GX6250, MT8176, 64 GB eMMC Flash
246 MBit/s ∼43% -57%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
209 MBit/s ∼37% -63%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 (SM-T825)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 (SM-T825)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 (SM-T825)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 (SM-T825)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 (SM-T825)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 (SM-T825)
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
433
cd/m²
438
cd/m²
472
cd/m²
442
cd/m²
452
cd/m²
488
cd/m²
476
cd/m²
487
cd/m²
526
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 526 cd/m² Average: 468.2 cd/m² Minimum: 1.56 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 82 %
Center on Battery: 452 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.8 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 1.2 | - Ø
99.06% sRGB (Argyll) 82.32% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll)
Gamma: 2.11
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Super AMOLED, 2048x1526, 9.7
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
Super AMOLED, 2048x1536, 9.7
Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro
IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1
Apple iPad Pro 9.7
IPS, 2048x1536, 9.7
Google Pixel C
LTPS, 2560x1800, 10.2
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
IPS, 2048x1536, 9.7
Apple iPad (2017)
IPS, 2048x1536, 9.7
Screen
-8%
-114%
3%
-184%
-166%
-11%
Brightness
468
357
-24%
385
-18%
500
7%
510
9%
443
-5%
485
4%
Brightness Distribution
82
86
5%
91
11%
93
13%
91
11%
86
5%
88
7%
Black Level *
0.59
0.52
0.39
0.43
0.46
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
1.8
1.78
1%
4.5
-150%
1.1
39%
5.24
-191%
5.5
-206%
1.4
22%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.2
1.38
-15%
4.8
-300%
1.4
-17%
7.95
-563%
6.7
-458%
2.1
-75%
Gamma
2.11 114%
2.24 107%
2.47 97%
2.11 114%
2.16 111%
2.06 117%
2.22 108%
CCT
6500 100%
6366 102%
7426 88%
6662 98%
6565 99%
7457 87%
6647 98%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
82.32
62.97
-24%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.06
99.55
0%
Contrast
664
1006
1249
1137
1117

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 221.2 Hz100 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 221.2 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 221.2 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 54 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8568 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

vs. sRGB (99.06%)
vs. sRGB (99.06%)
vs. AdobeRGB (82.32%)
vs. AdobeRGB (82.32%)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
3.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2 ms rise
↘ 1.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (26.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2 ms rise
↘ 2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (42.5 ms).
AnTuTu Benchmark v6 - Total Score
Apple iPad Pro 9.7
168840 Points ∼74% +17%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
165382 Points ∼73% +15%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
144426 Points ∼63%
Apple iPad (2017)
128706 Points ∼56% -11%
Google Pixel C
90568 Points ∼40% -37%
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F
88989 Points ∼39% -38%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
86735 Points ∼38% -40%
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
74177 Points ∼33% -49%
Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro
29823 Points ∼13% -79%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
Apple iPad Pro 9.7
117.1 fps ∼9% +27%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
104 fps ∼8% +13%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
92 fps ∼7%
Apple iPad (2017)
80.8 fps ∼6% -12%
Google Pixel C
69 fps ∼5% -25%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
38 fps ∼3% -59%
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F
31 fps ∼2% -66%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
29 fps ∼2% -68%
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
29 fps ∼2% -68%
Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro
14 fps ∼1% -85%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16
Apple iPad Pro 9.7
59.4 fps ∼13% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
59 fps ∼13%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
58 fps ∼13% -2%
Apple iPad (2017)
56 fps ∼12% -5%
Google Pixel C
39 fps ∼9% -34%
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F
31 fps ∼7% -47%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
29 fps ∼6% -51%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
23 fps ∼5% -61%
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
23 fps ∼5% -61%
Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro
13 fps ∼3% -78%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL
Apple iPad Pro 9.7
51 fps ∼9% +6%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
50 fps ∼9% +4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
48 fps ∼9%
Apple iPad (2017)
40.6 fps ∼7% -15%
Google Pixel C
40 fps ∼7% -17%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
17 fps ∼3% -65%
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F
14 fps ∼3% -71%
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
14 fps ∼3% -71%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
13 fps ∼2% -73%
Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro
5.6 fps ∼1% -88%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
38 fps ∼10% +12%
Apple iPad Pro 9.7
35.1 fps ∼10% +3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
34 fps ∼9%
Apple iPad (2017)
28.7 fps ∼8% -16%
Google Pixel C
22 fps ∼6% -35%
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F
15 fps ∼4% -56%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
12 fps ∼3% -65%
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
9.7 fps ∼3% -71%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
9 fps ∼2% -74%
Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro
5.2 fps ∼1% -85%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
42 fps ∼10% +31%
Apple iPad Pro 9.7
39.5 fps ∼9% +23%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
32 fps ∼8%
Google Pixel C
31 fps ∼7% -3%
Apple iPad (2017)
28.5 fps ∼7% -11%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
7.7 fps ∼2% -76%
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F
7.2 fps ∼2% -77%
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
fps ∼0% -100%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Apple iPad Pro 9.7
26.9 fps ∼15% +42%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
23 fps ∼13% +21%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
19 fps ∼11%
Apple iPad (2017)
18.5 fps ∼11% -3%
Google Pixel C
13 fps ∼7% -32%
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F
7 fps ∼4% -63%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
4.2 fps ∼2% -78%
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
fps ∼0% -100%
GFXBench 4.0
off screen Car Chase Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
25 fps ∼7% +32%
Google Pixel C
24 fps ∼7% +26%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
19 fps ∼5%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
4.8 fps ∼1% -75%
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
fps ∼0% -100%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
13 fps ∼0%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
13 fps ∼0% 0%
Google Pixel C
12 fps ∼0% -8%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
3.1 fps ∼0% -76%
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
fps ∼0% -100%
PCMark for Android
Storage score
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
4585 Points ∼30% +59%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
2884 Points ∼19%
Work 2.0 performance score
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
5432 Points ∼53%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
5195 Points ∼50% -4%
Work performance score
Google Pixel C
6858 Points ∼80% +22%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
5830 Points ∼68% +4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
5608 Points ∼66%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
5565 Points ∼65% -1%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
5204 Points ∼61% -7%
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F
4504 Points ∼53% -20%
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
3898 Points ∼46% -30%
Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro
3536 Points ∼41% -37%
BaseMark OS II
Web
Apple iPad (2017)
1213 Points ∼72% +20%
Apple iPad Pro 9.7
1185 Points ∼70% +18%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
1163 Points ∼69% +15%
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
1086 Points ∼64% +8%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
1022 Points ∼60% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
1007 Points ∼59%
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F
973 Points ∼57% -3%
Google Pixel C
884 Points ∼52% -12%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
648 Points ∼38% -36%
Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro
9 Points ∼1% -99%
Graphics
Apple iPad Pro 9.7
6485 Points ∼70% +31%
Google Pixel C
6355 Points ∼69% +29%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
6126 Points ∼66% +24%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
4941 Points ∼53%
Apple iPad (2017)
4569 Points ∼49% -8%
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F
2035 Points ∼22% -59%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
1385 Points ∼15% -72%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
1302 Points ∼14% -74%
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
1185 Points ∼13% -76%
Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro
729 Points ∼8% -85%
Memory
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3135 Points ∼71% +62%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
2212 Points ∼50% +15%
Apple iPad Pro 9.7
2185 Points ∼49% +13%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
1931 Points ∼44%
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
1887 Points ∼43% -2%
Apple iPad (2017)
1341 Points ∼30% -31%
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F
1270 Points ∼29% -34%
Google Pixel C
868 Points ∼20% -55%
Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro
750 Points ∼17% -61%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
590 Points ∼13% -69%
System
Apple iPad Pro 9.7
6098 Points ∼59% +74%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
5319 Points ∼52% +52%
Apple iPad (2017)
4680 Points ∼46% +34%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
3581 Points ∼35% +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
3505 Points ∼34%
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
3071 Points ∼30% -12%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
2867 Points ∼28% -18%
Google Pixel C
2724 Points ∼26% -22%
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F
2047 Points ∼20% -42%
Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro
1250 Points ∼12% -64%
Overall
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3301 Points ∼87% +37%
Apple iPad Pro 9.7
3181 Points ∼84% +32%
Apple iPad (2017)
2441 Points ∼64% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
2409 Points ∼64%
Google Pixel C
1909 Points ∼50% -21%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
1800 Points ∼47% -25%
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
1652 Points ∼44% -31%
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F
1506 Points ∼40% -37%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
1103 Points ∼29% -54%
Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro
283 Points ∼7% -88%
Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
6375 Points ∼23% +64%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
5277 Points ∼19% +36%
Apple iPad (2017)
4432 Points ∼16% +14%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
3884 Points ∼14%
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
3324 Points ∼12% -14%
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F
3118 Points ∼11% -20%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Apple iPad (2017)
2550 Points ∼44% +53%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
1952 Points ∼34% +17%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
1726 Points ∼30% +3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
1668 Points ∼29%
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
1592 Points ∼28% -5%
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F
1025 Points ∼18% -39%
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
6695 Points ∼27% +60%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
4187 Points ∼17%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
2015 Points ∼34% +15%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
1745 Points ∼29%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
1280 Points ∼68% +108%
Apple iPad Pro 9.7
1206 Points ∼64% +96%
Apple iPad (2017)
1061 Points ∼57% +73%
Google Pixel C
764 Points ∼41% +24%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
615 Points ∼33%
ANDEBench PRO
3D
Google Pixel C
104.7 fps ∼80% +75%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
60 fps ∼46%
Platform
Google Pixel C
268.9 Points ∼4% +20%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
224.2 Points ∼3%
Storage
Google Pixel C
6135 KB/s ∼6% +51%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
4069 KB/s ∼4%
Memory Latency
Google Pixel C
6624 KOps/s ∼82% +63%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
4056 KOps/s ∼50%
Memory Bandwidth
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
18870 MB/s ∼90%
Google Pixel C
9465 MB/s ∼45% -50%
CoreMark-PRO/HPC (Base)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
5299 Points ∼83%
Google Pixel C
3617 Points ∼56% -32%
Device Score
Google Pixel C
13745 Points ∼53% +11%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
12353 Points ∼47%
Epic Citadel - Ultra High Quality
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
59.7 fps ∼97% +15%
Google Pixel C
56.6 fps ∼92% +9%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
52.1 fps ∼85%

Legend

 
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Apple iPad Pro 9.7 Apple A9X, Apple A9X / PowerVR Series 7XT, Apple 256 GB (iPad Pro 9.7 NVMe)
 
Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939, Qualcomm Adreno 405, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE Samsung Exynos 5433 Octa, ARM Mali-T760 MP6, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Google Pixel C Nvidia Tegra X1, NVIDIA Tegra X1 Maxwell GPU, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch HiSilicon Kirin 950, ARM Mali-T880 MP4, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M Mediatek MT8176, PowerVR GX6250, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F Intel Atom x5-Z8550, Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Apple iPad (2017) Apple A9, Apple A9 / PowerVR GT7600, 128 GB NVMe
 
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus Samsung Exynos 8895 Octa, ARM Mali-G71 MP20, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Apple iPad Pro 9.7
225 Points ∼30% +70%
Apple iPad (2017)
205 Points ∼27% +55%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
154 Points ∼20% +17%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
136 Points ∼18% +3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
132 Points ∼18%
Google Pixel C
128 Points ∼17% -3%
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F
115 Points ∼15% -13%
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
98 Points ∼13% -26%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
79 Points ∼11% -40%
Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro
56 Points ∼7% -58%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPad Pro 9.7
19621 Points ∼40% +106%
Apple iPad (2017)
18148 Points ∼37% +90%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
14050 Points ∼28% +47%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
11404 Points ∼23% +20%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
9531 Points ∼19%
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F
8060 Points ∼16% -15%
Google Pixel C
7563 Points ∼15% -21%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
6885 Points ∼14% -28%
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
3596 Points ∼7% -62%
Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro
2672 Points ∼5% -72%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro
14064 ms * ∼24% -527%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
6483.2 ms * ∼11% -189%
Google Pixel C
5533.1 ms * ∼9% -147%
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F
4419 ms * ∼7% -97%
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
3001 ms * ∼5% -34%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
2822.9 ms * ∼5% -26%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
2244.4 ms * ∼4%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
2236.7 ms * ∼4% -0%
Apple iPad Pro 9.7
1546.3 ms * ∼3% +31%
Apple iPad (2017)
1457.7 ms * ∼2% +35%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Apple iPad Pro 9.7
143 Points ∼0% +235%
Apple iPad (2017)
128.6 Points ∼0% +201%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
62.198 Points ∼0% +46%
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
57.4 Points ∼0% +34%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
53.7 Points ∼0% +26%
Google Pixel C
47.4 Points ∼0% +11%
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F
44.84 Points ∼0% +5%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
42.73 Points ∼0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
41.12 Points ∼0% -4%
Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro
18 Points ∼0% -58%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTEHuawei MediaPad T2 10.0 ProGoogle Pixel CHuawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inchAsus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500MLenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90FSamsung Galaxy S8 Plus
AndroBench 3-5
-32%
-52%
-25%
9%
-27%
-34%
80%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
58.56
13.98
-76%
23.52
-60%
26.9
-54%
30.6
-48%
57.24
-2%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
76.39
17.57
-77%
61.65
-19%
45.15
-41%
48.9
-36%
71.12
-7%
Random Write 4KB
13.13
9.82
-25%
9.86
-25%
10.08
-23%
31.35
139%
6.8
-48%
11.7
-11%
15.27
16%
Random Read 4KB
45.82
25.56
-44%
14.59
-68%
19.96
-56%
32.04
-30%
24.85
-46%
23.5
-49%
127.18
178%
Sequential Write 256KB
87.6
49.37
-44%
78.2
-11%
109.38
25%
117.15
34%
136.5
56%
80.6
-8%
194.18
122%
Sequential Read 256KB
288.58
248.24
-14%
131.04
-55%
154.29
-47%
249.68
-13%
209.3
-27%
143.4
-50%
787.6
173%
Dead Trigger 2
 SettingsValue
 high30 fps
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 SettingsValue
 high30 fps
 very low30 fps
Max. Load
 31.6 °C34.4 °C28.3 °C 
 29.2 °C28.5 °C27.6 °C 
 27.3 °C28.3 °C29.7 °C 
Maximum: 34.4 °C
Average: 29.4 °C
26.8 °C30.2 °C31.1 °C
26.7 °C26.4 °C28.8 °C
26.9 °C26.5 °C26.9 °C
Maximum: 31.1 °C
Average: 27.8 °C
Power Supply (max.)  30.6 °C | Room Temperature 21.3 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 thermal image under load with a Flir thermal camera
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 thermal image under load with a Flir thermal camera
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.639.82525.430.73125.330.64032.933.55033.632.26331.630.38028.425.91002726.612520.826.81602236.220021.346.325020.861.331521.27240019.475.350019.573.863017.780.880017.980.5100017.879.2125017.373.4160017.474.1200016.772250017.268.5315018.267.7400017.970.7500017.672.8630017.769800017.873.51000017.970.31250018.167.71600018.264.4SPL3086.5N1.371median 17.9Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825median 70.7Delta1.38.339.631.432.735.235.439.635.230.636.927.629.735.227.530.127.224.829.527.527.828.428.227.129.727.834.845.632.435.439.734.831.934.833.53733.931.931.633.628.530.328.531.63437.733.527.828.2344345.529.434.126434650.636.736.520.64650.854.239.840.120.750.855.560.842.342.820.655.561.363.246.147.42161.359.266.746.447.118.459.26368.445.44618.76359.166.447.74817.959.164.770.950.752.918.664.768.173.853.254.817.568.173.178.65860.416.973.175.178.859.259.317.475.169.575.854.455.716.269.569.378.954.559.416.969.371.776.556.656.317.571.770.378.953.858.317.270.369.481.452.960.917.769.472.482.955.862.517.472.469.48253.160.317.669.461.678.345.15617.661.65875.239.851.617.85848.868.73145.717.948.882.490.666.970.529.882.453.28520.625.51.353.2median 63Apple iPad Pro 9.7median 73.8median 47.7median 52.9median 17.8median 638.49.37.27.31.68.43730.934.43725.629.328.925.628.931.523.728.929.331.830.929.33935.937.23933.535.130.533.52730.928.52722.432.722.322.423.534.522.923.530.438.92030.434.443.420.434.440.649.719.840.644.255.620.344.247.158.619.247.152.265.917.952.257.172.616.357.15770.417.65758.472.41858.46176.917.66163.779.21763.760.376.717.260.359.275.717.759.256.977.717.356.963.181.917.463.166.688.517.766.664.584.81864.553.975.617.753.947.569.518.247.542.164.217.942.133.357.317.833.373.392.829.873.329.588.31.329.5median 53.9Google Pixel Cmedian 70.4median 17.9median 53.99.411.71.39.4hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.51 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 26% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 33%
Compared to all devices tested
» 33% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Apple iPad Pro 9.7 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.59 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 33%
Compared to all devices tested
» 24% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Google Pixel C audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (92.79 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 62% of all tested devices in this class were better, 15% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 33%
Compared to all devices tested
» 64% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.03 / 0.29 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 2.08 / 3.5 / 3.58 Watt
Load midlight 6.97 / 7.4 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
6000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
5870 mAh
Apple iPad Pro 9.7
7306 mAh
Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro
6600 mAh
Google Pixel C
 mAh
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
5900 mAh
Apple iPad (2017)
 mAh
Power Consumption
-31%
-59%
-5%
-32%
-25%
-64%
Idle Minimum *
2.08
2.3
-11%
1.71
18%
1.58
24%
1.82
12%
1.59
24%
2.06
1%
Idle Average *
3.5
4.5
-29%
7.55
-116%
4.12
-18%
4.26
-22%
4.14
-18%
7.42
-112%
Idle Maximum *
3.58
5
-40%
7.62
-113%
4.15
-16%
4.33
-21%
4.23
-18%
7.47
-109%
Load Average *
6.97
9.4
-35%
8.39
-20%
6.2
11%
9.82
-41%
10.89
-56%
9.45
-36%
Load Maximum *
7.4
10.4
-41%
12.08
-63%
9.27
-25%
13.99
-89%
11.58
-56%
12.31
-66%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
31h 43min
WiFi Surfing v1.3
12h 40min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
9h 11min
Load (maximum brightness)
6h 15min
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
6000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
5870 mAh
Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro
6600 mAh
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
5900 mAh
Apple iPad (2017)
 mAh
Apple iPad Pro 9.7
7306 mAh
Battery Runtime
-26%
-27%
-22%
-2%
-6%
Reader / Idle
1903
918
-52%
1230
-35%
1453
-24%
1496
-21%
1850
-3%
H.264
551
651
18%
593
8%
600
9%
845
53%
708
28%
WiFi v1.3
760
393
-48%
416
-45%
518
-32%
764
1%
779
3%
Load
375
291
-22%
248
-34%
225
-40%
225
-40%
186
-50%

Pros

+ 高品质和超薄外壳
+ 可扩展存储
+ USB 3.1
+ 长运行时间
+ 强大的SoC
+ 快速Wi-Fi
+ 包含HDR的优秀显示
+ 附送S触控笔
+ 扬声器优秀
+ 有通话功能

Cons

- 仅仅是 LTE Cat. 6
- 存储缓慢
- 摄像头薄弱
- 没有NFC
- 廉价感
In review: Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 LTE (SM-T825). Test model courtesy of Samsung Germany.
In review: Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 LTE (SM-T825). Test model courtesy of Samsung Germany.

三星Galaxy Tab S3 LTE是一款非常出色的平板电脑,不依赖高端硬件(就像Apple iPad 2017那样),但整体包装非常引人注目。

三星Galaxy Tab S3可能不会那么出类拔萃,但它是目前最好的Android平板电脑。

除了支持HDR的显示器,良好的扬声器,增强后的电池续航时间和支持S触控笔之外,Wi-Fi模块还特别快。集成的骁龙820虽然说比不上最新的高通SoC,但它的性能还是很棒。只不过小而慢的eMMC存储不太适合高级多媒体平板电脑。三星同样没有配备非常好的摄像头,所以没有真正的物超所值的感觉。

我们真的很喜欢S触控笔。它将随Tab S3一起发货。这给我们留下了很好的印象。770欧元(〜839美元)对于平板电脑来说,依旧昂贵。如果您已经有了Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 而且不需要触控笔,那就没有必要换新机。

注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里

 

Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 - 04/26/2017 v6
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis
88%
Keyboard
77 / 80 → 96%
Pointing Device
94%
Connectivity
51 / 65 → 79%
Weight
84 / 88 → 92%
Battery
93%
Display
90%
Games Performance
61 / 68 → 90%
Application Performance
58 / 76 → 77%
Temperature
94%
Noise
100%
Audio
76 / 91 → 83%
Camera
61 / 85 → 72%
Average
79%
91%
Tablet - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 三星 Galaxy Tab S3 平板电脑简短评测
Daniel Schmidt, 2017-05- 8 (Update: 2017-05-14)