惠普 ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A 评测：依靠 Zen 4 的强大办公笔记本电脑

Name: HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A
Brand: HP

长跑运动员 惠普的一些笔记本给人的感觉更像是塑料炸弹，而 ZBook Firefly 看起来却相当高端。我们测试了目前基于 AMD 的 14 英寸 G10 A 机型，并揭示了它的优缺点。

Florian Glaser, 👁 Florian Glaser (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 10/14/2023 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

AMD Laptop / Notebook Radeon Ryzen (Zen) Windows Zen 4

2023 年，萤火虫 14 提供了一系列配置供用户选择。英特尔爱好者可以选择 Raptor Lake 系列处理器，而 AMD 版本则配备 Zen 4 芯片。除了 Ryzen 7 7840HS之外，惠普还提供 Ryzen 5 Pro 7640HS，我们评测的机型采用的就是这款处理器。而不是 Radeon 780M而不是 Radeon 760M作为 iGPU，但与英特尔 iGPU 相比，后者的性能仍然可圈可点。目前的 5G3G5ES#ABD 型号在我们评估期间的售价约为 1260 美元至 1360 美元。该机型配备 16GB DDR5-5600 内存和 512GB NVMe 固态硬盘，采用 16:10 宽高比的雾面 IPS 面板，分辨率为 1920 x 1200 像素。显示屏亮度为 400 cd/m²，覆盖 100% sRGB 色彩空间（稍后将详细介绍）。Windows 11 Pro 版本完善了整套配置。

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A (ZBook Firefly 14 Series)

Processor

AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS 6 x 4.3 - 5 GHz, 55 W PL2 / Short Burst, 41 W PL1 / Sustained, Phoenix (Zen4)

Graphics adapter

AMD Radeon 760M - 512 MB VRAM, Memory: 2800 MHz, DDR5, Adrenalin 22.40.03.38

Memory

16 GB

, DDR5-5600 SO-DIMM

Display

14.00 inch 16:10, 1920 x 1200 pixel 162 PPI, CMN1435, IPS, glossy: no, 60 Hz

Mainboard

AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH

Storage

Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU, 512 GB

, NVMe-SSD

Soundcard

Realtek ALC245 @ AMD K19.7 - Audio Processor - High Definition Audio Controller

Connections

2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 2 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 2 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: Combined (Headset/Mic), 1 SmartCard, 1 Fingerprint Reader

Networking

MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.3

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 20 x 316 x 224

Battery

51 Wh Lithium-Polymer, 3 Cells

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 11 Pro

Camera

Webcam: 5 MP

Additional features

Speakers: 2.0 Bang & Olufsen, Keyboard: Chiclet, 65 W USB C Power Supply, 12 Months Warranty

Weight

1.5 kg, Power Supply: 300 g

Price

1200 EUR

Links

HP homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Firefly 14 面临着其他采用当前 AMD CPU 的办公笔记本（如联想 LOQ 15APH8 和惠普 EliteBook 845 G10）以及采用英特尔 CPU 的设备（如联想 Yoga 9 14IRP G8 和华为 MateBook X Pro）的竞争。这些设备都包含在我们的对比表中，以供参考。

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
87.4 %	10/2023	HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A R5 PRO 7640HS, Radeon 760M	1.5 kg	20 mm	14.00"	1920x1200
	08/2023	Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 Ryzen 5 R5 7640HS, Radeon 760M	2.5 kg	25.2 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
90.1 %	08/2023	HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA R9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon 780M	1.5 kg	17.9 mm	14.00"	2560x1600
89.3 %	03/2023	Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	1.4 kg	15.25 mm	14.00"	2880x1800
89.6 %	06/2023	Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	1.3 kg	15.6 mm	14.20"	3120x2080

由于该机箱与 2022 年测试的 Firefly 14 G9 看起来完全相同，只是盖子上的标志有所变化（现在是 HP 而不是 Z），因此我们不会在本文中深入探讨机箱、设备（端口等）和输入设备。您可以参考链接文章了解这些方面的详细信息。

尺寸比较

HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 DIN A4 ❌

交流

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1584 (1475^min, 1490.08^P1 - 1736^max) MBit/s +143%
Average MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card (358 - 1785, n=38)	1328 MBit/s +103%
Average of class Workstation (521 - 1838, n=20, last 2 years)	1086 MBit/s +66%
HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	653 (323^min - 1015^max) MBit/s
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	591 (549^min - 636^max) MBit/s -9%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	1720 (1696^min - 1743^max) MBit/s
Average of class Workstation (845 - 1777, n=20, last 2 years)	1437 MBit/s -16%
Average MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card (848 - 1775, n=38)	1435 MBit/s -17%
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1430 (1392^min, 1397.22^P1 - 1459^max) MBit/s -17%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	938 (925^min - 950^max) MBit/s -45%

HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø653 (323-1015)

Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø1584 (1475-1736)

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø591 (549-636)

HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1720 (1696-1743)

Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø1430 (1392-1459)

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø938 (925-950)

网络摄像头

ColorChecker HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A: 7.07 ∆E min: 1.76 - max: 11.04 ∆E

显示屏

显示屏方面没有任何变化。惠普继续使用与前代机型相同的 IPS 面板（CMN1435）。与上次测试相比，显示屏的显示率略有偏差，部分原因是典型的系列变化。


351 cd/m²	343 cd/m²	352 cd/m²
389 cd/m²	397 cd/m²	367 cd/m²
375 cd/m²	371 cd/m²	360 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

CMN1435 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 397 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 367.2 cd/m² Minimum: 16 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 86 %
Center on Battery: 397 cd/m²
Contrast: 1588:1 (Black: 0.25 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.35 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 1.15
ΔE Greyscale 2.4 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
70.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
68.7% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.067

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A CMN1435, IPS, 1920x1200, 14.00	HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA AUO6DA8, IPS, 2560x1600, 14.00	Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 LEN140WQ+, OLED, 2880x1800, 14.00	Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 TMX1422, IPS, 3120x2080, 14.20
Display		22%	29%	17%
Display P3 Coverage	68.7	98.3 43%	99.9 45%	89.8 31%
sRGB Coverage	98.2	99.8 2%	100 2%	99.4 1%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	70.8	86.2 22%	98.3 39%	84.2 19%
Response Times		73%	97%	68%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	56.2 ?(25.6, 30.6)	12.7 ?(5.8, 7) 77%	1.04 ?(0.57, 0.57) 98%	20 ?(6, 14) 64%
Response Time Black / White *	25.2 ?(10.4, 14.8)	7.9 ?(4.1, 3.8) 69%	0.95 ?(0.48, 0.47) 96%	7 ?(2, 5) 72%
PWM Frequency			360 ?(86)	156000 ?(50)
Screen		12%	83%	11%
Brightness middle	397	546 38%	378 -5%	595 50%
Brightness	367	564 54%	379 3%	550 50%
Brightness Distribution	86	86 0%	98 14%	85 -1%
Black Level *	0.25	0.38 -52%	0.03 88%	0.25 -0%
Contrast	1588	1437 -10%	12600 693%	2380 50%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	2.35	1.3 45%	2.5 -6%	2.01 14%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	4.68	5.3 -13%	4.7 -0%	6.9 -47%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	1.15	1.2 -4%	1.9 -65%	1.22 -6%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.4	1.1 54%	1.9 21%	2.74 -14%
Gamma	2.067 ^106%	2.27 ^97%	2.2 ^100%	2.4 ^92%
CCT	6409 ^101%	6463 ^101%	6222 ^104%	6319 ^103%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		36% / 23%	70% / 73%	32% / 20%

* ... smaller is better

我们评测的样品亮度略低于宣传的 400 cd/m²，平均亮度为 367 cd/m²。虽然这个亮度值并不出众，但还是值得肯定的，毕竟 EliteBook 845 G10 和华为 MateBook X Pro 等竞争对手的亮度水平要高得多。不过，由于 0.25 cd/m² 的黑色值尚可接受，对比度仍达到 1,588:1，对于 IPS 面板来说相当不错。

另一方面，响应时间明显落后于竞争对手，从黑到白的转换时间为 25 毫秒，从灰到灰的变化时间为 56 毫秒，即使对于办公笔记本来说也是相当适中的。尽管如此，大多数买家还是会对色彩空间感到满意。虽然 Firefly 14 并不完全覆盖 DCI-P3 和 AdobeRGB（与某些竞争对手不同），但其约 98% 的 sRGB 覆盖率还是可圈可点的。此外，它的色彩已经相当自然，无需校准。

可视角度达到了通常的 IPS 水平，即使在倾斜位置也能确保相对良好的可视性。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
25.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 10.4 ms rise
25.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 14.8 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 55 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
56.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 25.6 ms rise
56.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 30.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 92 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17853 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

性能

只要你不打算运行要求苛刻的 3D 应用程序，以目前的硬件配置，Firefly 14 的资源应该足以支撑未来几年的使用。唯一的缺点是 512 GB 的存储容量有些有限。如果需要，可以安装更大的 M.2 型号来解决这个问题。

处理器

如前所述，Ryzen 5 Pro 7640HS 是 Zen 4 系列的最新成员，拥有 6 个内核，由于采用了 SMT 技术，最多可同时处理 12 个线程。在负载情况下，运行时钟频率在 4.3 至 5 GHz 之间，性能令人印象深刻。此外，该处理器还配备了 16 MB 三级缓存，进一步增强了其性能。

Ryzen 5 Pro 在基准测试中表现出强劲的性能。虽然联想 LOQ 中的 7640HS（非 Pro）计算速度稍快，但与 Ryzen 9 Pro 7940HS 的性能水平仍有差距。 Ryzen 9 Pro 7940HS的性能水平。英特尔的主要竞争对手之一酷睿 i7-1360P在 Cinebench 循环中落后于英特尔，原因是其性能发展更为稳定。

Cinebench R15 Multi Loop

HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS: Ø1837 (1822.49-1862.54)

Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 Ryzen 5 AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS: Ø2059 (1932.37-2078.89)

HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS: Ø2330 (2299.38-2359.74)

Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 Intel Core i7-1360P: Ø1703 (1611.41-2114.84)

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P: Ø1613 (1476.83-1993.62)

CPU Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Workstation	79 pt
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 Ryzen 5 AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS	75.5 pt
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS	75.2 pt
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 Intel Core i7-1360P	70.8 pt
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P	69.3 pt
HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS	65.8 pt

Cinebench R23
Multi Core
Average of class Workstation (4332 - 24560, n=29, last 2 years)	15473 Points +34%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS	14919 Points +30%
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 Ryzen 5 AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS	13029 Points +13%
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 Intel Core i7-1360P	11922 Points +4%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P	11571 Points +1%
HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS	11507 Points
Single Core
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 Intel Core i7-1360P	1877 Points +19%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P	1848 Points +17%
Average of class Workstation (1144 - 2106, n=29, last 2 years)	1761 Points +11%
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 Ryzen 5 AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS	1715 Points +8%
HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS	1581 Points
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS	1568 Points -1%

Cinebench R20
CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Workstation (1669 - 9329, n=30, last 2 years)	5876 Points +30%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS	5790 Points +28%
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 Ryzen 5 AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS	5044 Points +11%
HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS	4530 Points
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P	4526 Points 0%
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 Intel Core i7-1360P	4472 Points -1%
CPU (Single Core)
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 Intel Core i7-1360P	727 Points +19%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P	719 Points +17%
Average of class Workstation (528 - 816, n=30, last 2 years)	685 Points +12%
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 Ryzen 5 AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS	667 Points +9%
HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS	612 Points
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS	611 Points 0%

Cinebench R15
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Workstation (706 - 3625, n=29, last 2 years)	2411 Points +29%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS	2360 (2299.38^min - 2359.74^max) Points +27%
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 Intel Core i7-1360P	2115 (1611.41^min - 2114.84^max) Points +14%
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 Ryzen 5 AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS	2079 (1932.37^min - 2078.89^max) Points +12%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P	2008 Points +8%
HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS	1863 (1822.49^min - 1862.54^max) Points
CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 Intel Core i7-1360P	271 Points +9%
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 Ryzen 5 AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS	271 Points +9%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P	267 Points +7%
Average of class Workstation (166.2 - 301, n=29, last 2 years)	256 Points +3%
HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS	249 Points
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS	247 Points -1%

Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P	295 Seconds * -9%
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 Intel Core i7-1360P	289 Seconds * -7%
HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS	270 Seconds *
Average of class Workstation (137 - 684, n=29, last 2 years)	248 Seconds * +8%
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 Ryzen 5 AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS	245 Seconds * +9%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS	215 Seconds * +20%

7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
Average of class Workstation (20087 - 99351, n=29, last 2 years)	61988 MIPS +21%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS	61303 MIPS +20%
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 Ryzen 5 AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS	54954 MIPS +8%
HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS	51096 MIPS
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 Intel Core i7-1360P	47518 MIPS -7%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P	45679 MIPS -11%
7z b 4 -mmt1
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 Ryzen 5 AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS	6465 MIPS +10%
HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS	5892 MIPS
Average of class Workstation (4777 - 6670, n=29, last 2 years)	5878 MIPS 0%
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 Intel Core i7-1360P	5863 MIPS 0%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS	5844 MIPS -1%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P	5717 MIPS -3%

Geekbench 5.5
Multi-Core
Average of class Workstation (5022 - 17487, n=29, last 2 years)	11836 Points +34%
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 Intel Core i7-1360P	10785 Points +22%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS	9897 Points +12%
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 Ryzen 5 AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS	9355 Points +6%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P	8909 Points +1%
HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS	8863 Points
Single-Core
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 Ryzen 5 AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS	1941 Points +11%
Average of class Workstation (1474 - 2095, n=29, last 2 years)	1829 Points +5%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P	1792 Points +3%
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 Intel Core i7-1360P	1790 Points +2%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS	1758 Points +1%
HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS	1748 Points

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Average of class Workstation (5.09 - 26, n=29, last 2 years)	17.2 fps +17%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS	17 fps +16%
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 Ryzen 5 AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS	16.7 fps +14%
HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS	14.7 fps
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 Intel Core i7-1360P	13 fps -12%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P	12.7 fps -14%

LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS	56.9 s *
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS	50.5 s * +11%
Average of class Workstation (36.5 - 95.2, n=29, last 2 years)	47.7 s * +16%
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 Intel Core i7-1360P	47.5 s * +17%
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 Ryzen 5 AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS	42.5 s * +25%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P	40.3 s * +29%

R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS	0.4888 sec *
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS	0.4835 sec * +1%
Average of class Workstation (0.3876 - 0.544, n=29, last 2 years)	0.4611 sec * +6%
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 Intel Core i7-1360P	0.46 sec * +6%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P	0.4578 sec * +6%
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 Ryzen 5 AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS	0.4399 sec * +10%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit

6888

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit

39399

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit

14191

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

21.61 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

2.97 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

1863 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

187.2 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

97.9 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

249 Points

Help

... in comparison

Performance Rating
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon 780M	94.1 pt
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 Ryzen 5 AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS, Radeon 760M	83.8 pt
Average of class Workstation	78.3 pt
HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS, Radeon 760M	76.7 pt
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	62.2 pt
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	58.8 pt

AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon 780M	24250 KRay/s +29%
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 Ryzen 5 AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS, Radeon 760M	21758 KRay/s +15%
HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS, Radeon 760M	18845 KRay/s
Average of class Workstation (2619 - 25776, n=29, last 2 years)	15717 KRay/s -17%
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	10472 KRay/s -44%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	9618 KRay/s -49%

AIDA64 / FPU Julia
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon 780M	101262 Points +28%
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 Ryzen 5 AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS, Radeon 760M	93503 Points +18%
HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS, Radeon 760M	79267 Points
Average of class Workstation (12909 - 109059, n=29, last 2 years)	78470 Points -1%
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	50527 Points -36%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	48441 Points -39%

AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon 780M	4418 MB/s +30%
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 Ryzen 5 AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS, Radeon 760M	3745 MB/s +10%
Average of class Workstation (824 - 4981, n=29, last 2 years)	3489 MB/s +2%
HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS, Radeon 760M	3407 MB/s
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	2404 MB/s -29%
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	2361 MB/s -31%

AIDA64 / CPU Queen
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon 780M	113016 Points +28%
Average of class Workstation (26716 - 131931, n=29, last 2 years)	97982 Points +11%
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 Ryzen 5 AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS, Radeon 760M	95660 Points +8%
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	89266 Points +1%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	89068 Points +1%
HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS, Radeon 760M	88555 Points

AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon 780M	14147 Points +33%
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 Ryzen 5 AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS, Radeon 760M	11449 Points +8%
HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS, Radeon 760M	10620 Points
Average of class Workstation (3105 - 14742, n=29, last 2 years)	10371 Points -2%
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	6996 Points -34%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	6597 Points -38%

AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon 780M	54003 Points +28%
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 Ryzen 5 AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS, Radeon 760M	50391 Points +19%
HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS, Radeon 760M	42254 Points
Average of class Workstation (6967 - 58181, n=29, last 2 years)	39314 Points -7%
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	25330 Points -40%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	23884 Points -43%

AIDA64 / CPU AES
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	87671 MB/s +40%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon 780M	76133 MB/s +21%
Average of class Workstation (19489 - 132156, n=29, last 2 years)	73296 MB/s +17%
HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS, Radeon 760M	62790 MB/s
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 Ryzen 5 AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS, Radeon 760M	51908 MB/s -17%
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	49062 MB/s -22%

AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon 780M	987 MB/s +31%
Average of class Workstation (314 - 1472, n=29, last 2 years)	943 MB/s +25%
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 Ryzen 5 AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS, Radeon 760M	841 MB/s +12%
HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS, Radeon 760M	754 MB/s
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	696 MB/s -8%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	686 MB/s -9%

AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon 780M	12755 KRay/s +28%
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 Ryzen 5 AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS, Radeon 760M	11868 KRay/s +19%
HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS, Radeon 760M	9999 KRay/s
Average of class Workstation (1473 - 13800, n=29, last 2 years)	8443 KRay/s -16%
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	5716 KRay/s -43%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	5193 KRay/s -48%

AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	44535 MPixel/s +32%
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	42386 MPixel/s +26%
Average of class Workstation (18157 - 51647, n=29, last 2 years)	37143 MPixel/s +10%
HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS, Radeon 760M	33752 MPixel/s
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 Ryzen 5 AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS, Radeon 760M	33172 MPixel/s -2%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon 780M	24030 MPixel/s -29%

系统性能

在系统性能方面，Firefly 14 在对比设备中排名第二。它在 PCMark 10 中的得分为 6336 分，以微弱劣势落后于 EliteBook 845 G10。

PCMark 10 / Score
Average of class Workstation (5488 - 8587, n=28, last 2 years)	6940 Points +10%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA Radeon 780M, R9 PRO 7940HS, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	6523 Points +3%
HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A Radeon 760M, R5 PRO 7640HS, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	6336 Points
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X101N BF	6195 Points -2%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P	5672 Points -10%

PCMark 10 / Essentials
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X101N BF	12059 Points +22%
Average of class Workstation (9151 - 12197, n=28, last 2 years)	10579 Points +7%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P	9883 Points 0%
HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A Radeon 760M, R5 PRO 7640HS, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	9882 Points
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA Radeon 780M, R9 PRO 7940HS, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	9873 Points 0%

PCMark 10 / Productivity
HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A Radeon 760M, R5 PRO 7640HS, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	9203 Points
Average of class Workstation (7846 - 10820, n=28, last 2 years)	9195 Points 0%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA Radeon 780M, R9 PRO 7940HS, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	9192 Points 0%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P	7180 Points -22%
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X101N BF	7162 Points -22%

PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Average of class Workstation (5399 - 13947, n=28, last 2 years)	9443 Points +24%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA Radeon 780M, R9 PRO 7940HS, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	8299 Points +9%
HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A Radeon 760M, R5 PRO 7640HS, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	7589 Points
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X101N BF	7472 Points -2%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P	6982 Points -8%

CrossMark / Overall
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P	1876 Points
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X101N BF	1756 Points
Average of class Workstation (1154 - 1972, n=28, last 2 years)	1731 Points
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA Radeon 780M, R9 PRO 7940HS, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	1423 Points

CrossMark / Productivity
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P	1829 Points
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X101N BF	1669 Points
Average of class Workstation (1188 - 1842, n=28, last 2 years)	1653 Points
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA Radeon 780M, R9 PRO 7940HS, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	1400 Points

CrossMark / Creativity
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X101N BF	1947 Points
Average of class Workstation (1180 - 2248, n=28, last 2 years)	1920 Points
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P	1917 Points
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA Radeon 780M, R9 PRO 7940HS, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	1549 Points

CrossMark / Responsiveness
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P	1899 Points
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X101N BF	1500 Points
Average of class Workstation (990 - 1865, n=28, last 2 years)	1466 Points
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA Radeon 780M, R9 PRO 7940HS, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	1161 Points

PCMark 10 Score		6336 points
Help

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency

AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	67015 MB/s +7%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	64187 MB/s +3%
HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS, Radeon 760M	62397 MB/s
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 Ryzen 5 AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS, Radeon 760M	61720 MB/s -1%
Average of class Workstation (30324 - 95718, n=29, last 2 years)	61037 MB/s -2%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon 780M	34938 MB/s -44%

AIDA64 / Memory Read
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	63509 MB/s +3%
HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS, Radeon 760M	61683 MB/s
Average of class Workstation (30787 - 86584, n=29, last 2 years)	59791 MB/s -3%
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	57493 MB/s -7%
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 Ryzen 5 AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS, Radeon 760M	56203 MB/s -9%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon 780M	30289 MB/s -51%

AIDA64 / Memory Write
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	83155 MB/s +6%
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 Ryzen 5 AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS, Radeon 760M	78869 MB/s +1%
HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS, Radeon 760M	78276 MB/s
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	74086 MB/s -5%
Average of class Workstation (32728 - 93871, n=29, last 2 years)	64490 MB/s -18%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon 780M	40169 MB/s -49%

AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	106.4 ns * -6%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon 780M	102.6 ns * -2%
HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS, Radeon 760M	100.7 ns *
Average of class Workstation (83.4 - 140.8, n=29, last 2 years)	100.3 ns * -0%
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	98.7 ns * +2%
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 Ryzen 5 AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS, Radeon 760M	92.4 ns * +8%

* ... smaller is better

DPC 延迟

延迟值不是最佳值，这是许多设备的常见问题。根据 LatencyMon 工具，某些活动（如实时音频和视频编辑）可能会遇到问题。

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P	6070.1 μs * -313%
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X101N BF	1820.8 μs * -24%
HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A Radeon 760M, R5 PRO 7640HS, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	1470.6 μs *
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA Radeon 780M, R9 PRO 7940HS, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	697.4 μs * +53%

* ... smaller is better

存储设备

尽管系统性能名列前茅，但大容量存储设备在测试中却排名最后。512 GB 三星硬盘（PM9B1）的速度绝对不慢，但与竞争对手提供的速度更快的 NVMe 硬盘相比仍有差距。至少，即使在长期负载的情况下，速度也能保持不变。

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3619 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2517 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 425.6 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 345.1 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 2344 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 1723 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 58.99 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 107.2 MB/s

Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023	75.7 pt
Average of class Workstation	74.3 pt
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	72.2 pt
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X101N BF	68.6 pt
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 Ryzen 5 ^-11!	58.5 pt
Average Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	57.7 pt
HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	43 pt

DiskSpd
seq read
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X101N BF	3676 (3619.26^min - 3676.31^max) MB/s +51%
Average of class Workstation (1844 - 5715, n=28, last 2 years)	3426 MB/s +40%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	2989 (2968.66^min - 2989.28^max) MB/s +23%
Average Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU (2440 - 2710, n=7)	2621 MB/s +7%
HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	2440 (2385.72^min - 2439.62^max) MB/s
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 Ryzen 5	2107 (2097.99^min - 2107.01^max) MB/s -14%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023	2089 (1958.25^min - 2089.39^max) MB/s -14%
seq write
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023	3772 (213.28^min - 3772.36^max) MB/s +113%
Average of class Workstation (1309 - 7289, n=28, last 2 years)	3771 MB/s +113%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	3566 (3496.37^min - 3566.41^max) MB/s +102%
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 Ryzen 5	2596 (2438.36^min - 2595.7^max) MB/s +47%
Average Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU (1768 - 2472, n=7)	2114 MB/s +20%
HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	1768 (1717.28^min - 1767.69^max) MB/s
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X101N BF	1439 (1119.46^min - 1438.8^max) MB/s -19%
seq q8 t1 read
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	6683 (6134.38^min - 6682.57^max) MB/s +86%
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X101N BF	6592 (5400.38^min - 6592.37^max) MB/s +83%
Average of class Workstation (3361 - 12631, n=28, last 2 years)	6519 MB/s +81%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023	4886 (4359.86^min - 4886.36^max) MB/s +36%
HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	3600 (3082.18^min - 3600.18^max) MB/s
Average Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU (3562 - 3623, n=7)	3597 MB/s 0%
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 Ryzen 5	2803 (2605.95^min - 2803.05^max) MB/s -22%
seq q8 t1 write
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	6037 (6002.26^min - 6037.19^max) MB/s +139%
Average of class Workstation (2526 - 9890, n=28, last 2 years)	5502 MB/s +118%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023	3881 (113.46^min - 3881.41^max) MB/s +54%
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 Ryzen 5	2602 (2575.19^min - 2601.77^max) MB/s +3%
HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	2526 (2510.28^min - 2526.21^max) MB/s
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X101N BF	2487 (1182.32^min - 2486.59^max) MB/s -2%
Average Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU (2291 - 2526, n=7)	2433 MB/s -4%
4k q1 t1 read
Average Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU (58.4 - 80.8, n=7)	74.9 MB/s +28%
Average of class Workstation (45.4 - 92.2, n=28, last 2 years)	64.3 MB/s +10%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	60.7 (60^min - 60.68^max) MB/s +4%
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X101N BF	59.7 (58.73^min - 59.66^max) MB/s +2%
HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	58.4 (56.95^min - 58.41^max) MB/s
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 Ryzen 5	51.2 (49.81^min - 51.16^max) MB/s -12%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023	43.7 (23.85^min - 43.65^max) MB/s -25%
4k q1 t1 write
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023	360 (353.95^min - 359.55^max) MB/s +237%
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 Ryzen 5	272 (268.13^min - 271.58^max) MB/s +155%
Average Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU (106.8 - 237, n=7)	171.4 MB/s +60%
Average of class Workstation (106.8 - 251, n=28, last 2 years)	152.1 MB/s +42%
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X101N BF	150.3 (141.14^min - 150.34^max) MB/s +41%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	132.4 (130.43^min - 132.37^max) MB/s +24%
HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	106.8 (102.65^min - 106.79^max) MB/s
4k q32 t16 read
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023	2252 (2223.45^min - 2252.41^max) MB/s +143%
Average Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU (857 - 1837, n=7)	1435 MB/s +55%
Average of class Workstation (561 - 3965, n=28, last 2 years)	1308 MB/s +41%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	981 (956.75^min - 980.97^max) MB/s +6%
HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	927 (892.22^min - 927.05^max) MB/s
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X101N BF	777 (765.59^min - 777.23^max) MB/s -16%
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 Ryzen 5	715 (711.02^min - 715.15^max) MB/s -23%
4k q32 t16 write
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023	1611 (217.51^min - 1610.59^max) MB/s +346%
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 Ryzen 5	1305 (1257.81^min - 1305.21^max) MB/s +261%
Average Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU (361 - 1919, n=7)	1235 MB/s +242%
Average of class Workstation (360 - 3306, n=28, last 2 years)	906 MB/s +151%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	456 (447.45^min - 455.69^max) MB/s +26%
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X101N BF	431 (416.68^min - 431.09^max) MB/s +19%
HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	361 (350.01^min - 361.34^max) MB/s

AS SSD
Score Total
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023	6213 Points +147%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	5918 Points +136%
Average of class Workstation (2512 - 8992, n=27, last 2 years)	5495 Points +119%
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X101N BF	5343 Points +113%
Average Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU (2512 - 5210, n=7)	4130 Points +64%
HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	2512 Points
Score Read
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023	2872 Points +142%
Average of class Workstation (983 - 26650, n=27, last 2 years)	2640 Points +122%
Average Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU (1188 - 2027, n=7)	1631 Points +37%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	1419 Points +19%
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X101N BF	1389 Points +17%
HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	1188 Points
Score Write
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	3831 Points +416%
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X101N BF	3348 Points +351%
Average of class Workstation (742 - 4410, n=27, last 2 years)	2935 Points +296%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023	1894 Points +155%
Average Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU (742 - 2182, n=7)	1704 Points +130%
HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	742 Points
Seq Read
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X101N BF	5226 MB/s +81%
Average of class Workstation (2873 - 7437, n=27, last 2 years)	5183 MB/s +79%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	4270 MB/s +48%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023	3934 MB/s +36%
Average Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU (2856 - 3189, n=7)	3061 MB/s +6%
HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	2888.21 MB/s
Seq Write
Average of class Workstation (1785 - 6302, n=27, last 2 years)	3232 MB/s +52%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023	3205 MB/s +51%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	2853 MB/s +34%
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X101N BF	2759 MB/s +30%
HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	2124.11 MB/s
Average Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU (1430 - 2260, n=7)	1987 MB/s -6%
4K Read
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023	96.2 MB/s +87%
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X101N BF	68.6 MB/s +33%
Average Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU (51.5 - 78.1, n=7)	67.8 MB/s +32%
Average of class Workstation (46.6 - 84, n=27, last 2 years)	62.8 MB/s +22%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	59 MB/s +15%
HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	51.48 MB/s
4K Write
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X101N BF	217 MB/s +120%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023	189.9 MB/s +93%
Average of class Workstation (97.9 - 237, n=27, last 2 years)	169.3 MB/s +72%
Average Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU (98.6 - 228, n=7)	168.6 MB/s +71%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	152 MB/s +54%
HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	98.57 MB/s
4K-64 Read
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023	2382 MB/s +181%
Average Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU (848 - 1641, n=7)	1257 MB/s +48%
Average of class Workstation (421 - 2790, n=27, last 2 years)	1170 MB/s +38%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	933 MB/s +10%
HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	847.84 MB/s
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X101N BF	798 MB/s -6%
4K-64 Write
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	3394 MB/s +687%
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X101N BF	2855 MB/s +562%
Average of class Workstation (431 - 3818, n=27, last 2 years)	2442 MB/s +466%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023	1384 MB/s +221%
Average Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU (431 - 1797, n=7)	1337 MB/s +210%
HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	431.45 MB/s
Access Time Read
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023	0.136 ms * -167%
Average Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU (0.033 - 0.105, n=7)	0.06271 ms * -23%
HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	0.051 ms *
Average of class Workstation (0.017 - 0.092, n=27, last 2 years)	0.04441 ms * +13%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	0.031 ms * +39%
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X101N BF	0.021 ms * +59%
Access Time Write
Average of class Workstation (0.017 - 0.092, n=27, last 2 years)	0.04456 ms * -6%
Average Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU (0.03 - 0.097, n=7)	0.04214 ms * -0%
HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	0.042 ms *
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023	0.03 ms * +29%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	0.025 ms * +40%
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X101N BF	0.017 ms * +60%

* ... smaller is better

Dauerleistung Lesen: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU: Ø3608 (3131.47-3627.53)

Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 Ryzen 5 : Ø2780 (2567.65-2792.36)

HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N: Ø6531 (5688.05-6597.22)

Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X101N BF: Ø6514 (5471.68-6562.91)

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 : Ø3847 (1643.61-4890.01)

图形卡

Firefly 14 最大的亮点之一是相对较快的 iGPU。尽管与 Radeon 780M 的 768 个着色器单元相比，Radeon 760M 只有 512 个着色器单元，但其性能却超过了英特尔的同类产品、 Iris Xe Graphics G7在大多数情况下都优于英特尔同类产品 Iris Xe Graphics G7。这主要归功于 AMD 出色的图形驱动程序，尤其是在游戏支持方面。在 3DMarks 中，Firefly 14 的性能与同样配备 Radeon 760M 的联想 LOQ 相当。

3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Workstation	100 pt
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 Ryzen 5 AMD Radeon 760M	47.4 pt
HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A AMD Radeon 760M	45.5 pt
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	34.8 pt
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA AMD Radeon 780M	33.8 pt
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 ^-1! Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	31 pt

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Workstation (7432 - 54334, n=29, last 2 years)	24566 Points +163%
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 Ryzen 5 AMD Radeon 760M	9850 Points +5%
HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A AMD Radeon 760M	9356 Points
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA AMD Radeon 780M	7868 Points -16%
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	7222 Points -23%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	6752 Points -28%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Average of class Workstation (32743 - 133204, n=15, last 2 years)	64727 Points +59%
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 Ryzen 5 AMD Radeon 760M	42919 Points +6%
HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A AMD Radeon 760M	40615 Points
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	29086 Points -28%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA AMD Radeon 780M	27771 Points -32%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Workstation (4816 - 35868, n=29, last 2 years)	17159 Points +180%
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 Ryzen 5 AMD Radeon 760M	6162 Points +1%
HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A AMD Radeon 760M	6121 Points
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	5601 Points -8%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	5477 Points -11%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA AMD Radeon 780M	4550 Points -26%

3DMark 06 Standard Score		35337 points
3DMark Vantage P Result		32985 points
3DMark 11 Performance		9564 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score		176563 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		27608 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		5724 points
3DMark Time Spy Score		2244 points
Help

... in comparison

Blender - v3.3 Classroom CPU
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1360P	537 Seconds * -21%
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1360P	527 Seconds * -19%
HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A AMD Radeon 760M, AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS	444 Seconds *
Average of class Workstation (254 - 1326, n=30, last 2 years)	429 Seconds * +3%
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 Ryzen 5 AMD Radeon 760M, AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS	393 Seconds * +11%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS	345 Seconds * +22%

* ... smaller is better

游戏性能

如果我们忽略测试期间惠普没有提供最新的 GPU 驱动程序（AMD 官方驱动程序无法在 Firefly 14 上运行），以及由此导致的某些游戏问题（如星球大战绝地求生和装甲核心 6这两款游戏在启动时都会崩溃），事实证明 Radeon 760M 适用于较老或要求不高的游戏。如下表所示，在最佳情况下，iGPU 可以处理高至最高的细节。不过，用户通常不得不通过选择较低的设置来妥协，但前提是它们能在全高清环境下提供相当流畅的性能。

Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Workstation	100 pt
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 Ryzen 5 Radeon 760M, R5 7640HS	37.1 pt
HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A Radeon 760M, R5 PRO 7640HS	35.6 pt
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P	33.4 pt
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P	32.6 pt
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA Radeon 780M, R9 PRO 7940HS	27.2 pt

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Workstation (19.6 - 156.5, n=30, last 2 years)	65.9 fps +183%
HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A Radeon 760M, R5 PRO 7640HS	23.3 fps
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 Ryzen 5 Radeon 760M, R5 7640HS	23 fps -1%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P	16.4 fps -30%
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P	14.8 (14^min, 14^P1) fps -36%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA Radeon 780M, R9 PRO 7940HS	14.3 (12^min, 13^P1) fps -39%

GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Average of class Workstation (18.3 - 124.4, n=26, last 2 years)	70.9 fps +287%
HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A Radeon 760M, R5 PRO 7640HS	18.3 (1.834^min, 12.5^P1) fps
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 Ryzen 5 Radeon 760M, R5 7640HS	18.1 (1.041^min, 12.3^P1) fps -1%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA Radeon 780M, R9 PRO 7940HS	12.2 (4.27^min, 8.4^P1) fps -33%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P	11.5 (6.52^min, 7.87^P1) fps -37%
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P	10.7 (4.92^min, 7.09^P1) fps -42%

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Average of class Workstation (21.2 - 149.1, n=30, last 2 years)	66.1 fps +212%
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P	24.8 fps +17%
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 Ryzen 5 Radeon 760M, R5 7640HS	22.7 fps +7%
HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A Radeon 760M, R5 PRO 7640HS	21.2 fps
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P	19 fps -10%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA Radeon 780M, R9 PRO 7940HS	15.9 fps -25%

Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Average of class Workstation (33.2 - 283, n=28, last 2 years)	108.5 fps +203%
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 Ryzen 5 Radeon 760M, R5 7640HS	38 fps +6%
HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A Radeon 760M, R5 PRO 7640HS	35.8 (7.5^min, 11.4^P1) fps
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P	28.7 (6.7^min, 10.1^P1) fps -20%
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P	28.3 (5.4^min, 9.07^P1) fps -21%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA Radeon 780M, R9 PRO 7940HS	25 (17.4^min, 19.8^P1) fps -30%

Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Average of class Workstation (57.8 - 166.7, n=30, last 2 years)	123.4 fps +90%
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 Ryzen 5 Radeon 760M, R5 7640HS	68.2 (58^min) fps +5%
HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A Radeon 760M, R5 PRO 7640HS	64.8 (52.8^min) fps
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P	62.7 (53.2^min) fps -3%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P	59.6 (50.1^min) fps -8%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA Radeon 780M, R9 PRO 7940HS	51.5 (43.1^min) fps -21%

X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Average of class Workstation (27.7 - 122.4, n=31, last 2 years)	79.9 fps +188%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P	40.8 fps +47%
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P	38.6 fps +39%
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 Ryzen 5 Radeon 760M, R5 7640HS	29.8 fps +8%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA Radeon 780M, R9 PRO 7940HS	28.2 fps +2%
HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A Radeon 760M, R5 PRO 7640HS	27.7 fps

The Witcher 3
1366x768 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing
Average of class Workstation (73 - 430, n=28, last 2 years)	205 fps +177%
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 Ryzen 5 Radeon 760M, R5 7640HS	78 fps +6%
Average AMD Radeon 760M (73.9 - 78, n=2)	76 fps +3%
HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A Radeon 760M, R5 PRO 7640HS	73.9 (64^min) fps
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P	66 fps -11%
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P	65 fps -12%
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Average of class Workstation (34.9 - 298, n=29, last 2 years)	119.5 fps +242%
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 Ryzen 5 Radeon 760M, R5 7640HS	38 fps +9%
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P	37 fps +6%
Average AMD Radeon 760M (34.9 - 38, n=2)	36.5 fps +5%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P	35.7 fps +2%
HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A Radeon 760M, R5 PRO 7640HS	34.9 (28^min) fps
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA Radeon 780M, R9 PRO 7940HS	22 fps -37%
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Workstation (19.6 - 156.5, n=30, last 2 years)	65.9 fps +183%
HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A Radeon 760M, R5 PRO 7640HS	23.3 fps
Average AMD Radeon 760M (23 - 23.3, n=2)	23.2 fps 0%
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 Ryzen 5 Radeon 760M, R5 7640HS	23 fps -1%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P	16.4 fps -30%
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P	14.8 (14^min, 14^P1) fps -36%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA Radeon 780M, R9 PRO 7940HS	14.3 (12^min, 13^P1) fps -39%

我们使用角色扮演游戏对 3D 性能进行了长时间测试的 3D 性能进行了长时间测试。Witcher 3除了短暂的性能下降外，帧速率相当稳定。

Witcher 3 FPS chart

HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A R5 PRO 7640HS, Radeon 760M: Ø23.3 (14-25)

HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA R9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon 780M: Ø14.3 (12-16)

Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs: Ø14.8 (14-17)

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs: Ø16 (15-17)

	low	med.	high	ultra
GTA V (2015)	150.4	138.4	50.2	18.3
The Witcher 3 (2015)	115	73.9	34.9	23.3
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	143.7	113.4	70.2	64.8
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)	55.3	27.5	21.2
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	45.1	33.1	27.7
Strange Brigade (2018)	121	50.2	42.8	35.8
A Plague Tale Requiem (2022)	18.8	15.7	13.7
High On Life (2023)	50.6	28.8	23.5
Hogwarts Legacy (2023)	25.8	19.8	15.2
Returnal (2023)	20	19	17
Atomic Heart (2023)	38.6	28.8	16.7
Company of Heroes 3 (2023)	46.4	38.9	29.6
Sons of the Forest (2023)	32	19.6	19
Resident Evil 4 Remake (2023)	23.5	16.8	14.6
Star Wars Jedi Survivor (2023)	0 game wont start (crash)	0 game wont start (crash)	0 game wont start (crash)
Ratchet & Clank Rift Apart (2023)	20.5	0 ()	0 ()
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023)	29.5	25	19.1
Atlas Fallen (2023)	31.1	29.2	24.2
Immortals of Aveum (2023)	15.4		13.3
Armored Core 6 (2023)	0 game wont start (crash)	0 game wont start (crash)	0 game wont start (crash)
Starfield (2023)	14.3	7.99	5.04
The Crew Motorfest (2023)	25	23	19
Lies of P (2023)	33.7	27.9	24

排放量

系统噪音

Firefly 14 是为数不多的理论上适合对噪音敏感的用户使用的笔记本之一，尤其是在执行简单任务时。虽然风扇在空闲模式和轻度活动（如办公、视频播放和网页浏览）时并不总是完全静音的，但它的运行频率很低，即使在安静的环境中也很难察觉。唯一的问题是：我们的评测样本不得不面对明显的线圈啸叫，尤其是在空闲时，这可能会困扰一些用户。在负载情况下，它的表现一般不会太好。45 至 46 分贝（A）的噪音清晰可闻，尽管 CPU/GPU 性能较弱，但有时明显高于 EliteBook 845 G10（34 至 43 分贝）。

Noise Level

Idle		25 / 26 / 27 dB(A)
Load		45 / 46 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 25 dB(A)

	HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A R5 PRO 7640HS, Radeon 760M	HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA R9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon 780M	Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
Noise		6%	5%	1%
off / environment *	25	25.3 -1%	23.6 6%	25.4 -2%
Idle Minimum *	25	25.3 -1%	23.6 6%	25.4 -2%
Idle Average *	26	25.3 3%	23.6 9%	25.4 2%
Idle Maximum *	27	25.3 6%	24.6 9%	29.6 -10%
Load Average *	45	34.4 24%	45 -0%	42 7%
Witcher 3 ultra *	45	43.4 4%	45 -0%
Load Maximum *	46	43.4 6%	45 2%	40.9 11%

* ... smaller is better

温度

在温度方面，Firefly 14 的表现与其前代 EliteBook 相似。在空闲模式下，机箱表面的平均温度仅为 25°C，非常舒适。在 3D 模式下，我们的测试设备在机箱后三分之一处测得的温度高达 50°C（顶部）和 51°C（底部）。不过，42°C 的平均温度还是可以承受的，尽管其英特尔竞争对手联想 Yoga 9 和华为 Matebook X Pro 的温度更低。

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


46 °C	50 °C	48 °C
46 °C	45 °C	39 °C
37 °C	38 °C	33 °C

Maximum: 50 °C
Average: 42.4 °C


47 °C	51 °C	44 °C
40 °C	48 °C	44 °C
35 °C	38 °C	38 °C

Maximum: 51 °C
Average: 42.8 °C

Power Supply (max.) 48 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


25 °C	25 °C	25 °C
25 °C	25 °C	25 °C
25 °C	24 °C	24 °C

Maximum: 25 °C
Average: 24.8 °C


26 °C	27 °C	26 °C
25 °C	26 °C	26 °C
25 °C	25 °C	25 °C

Maximum: 27 °C
Average: 25.7 °C

Power Supply (max.) 26 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


44 °C	46 °C	45 °C
44 °C	43 °C	40 °C
35 °C	37 °C	33 °C

Maximum: 46 °C
Average: 40.8 °C


47 °C	48 °C	46 °C
36 °C	47 °C	44 °C
35 °C	37 °C	37 °C

Maximum: 48 °C
Average: 41.9 °C

Power Supply (max.) 47 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 42.4 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 32 °C / 90 F for the devices in the class Workstation.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 50 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 38.1 °C / 101 F, ranging from 22.2 to 69.8 °C for the class Workstation.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 51 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 41.3 °C / 106 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.8 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 32 °C / 90 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 40.8 °C / 105 F, compared to the device average of 32 °C / 90 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 38 °C / 100.4 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.8 °C / 82 F (-10.2 °C / -18.4 F).

	HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A R5 PRO 7640HS, Radeon 760M	HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA R9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon 780M	Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
Heat		0%	8%	-11%
Maximum Upper Side *	50	45.6 9%	39.7 21%	46.5 7%
Maximum Bottom *	51	51.9 -2%	45.4 11%	44.7 12%
Idle Upper Side *	25	26.5 -6%	25.7 -3%	34.9 -40%
Idle Bottom *	27	27 -0%	26.4 2%	32.9 -22%

* ... smaller is better

压力测试

Furmark 和 Prime95 压力测试没有发现严重问题。CPU 的节流低于基本速率的情况并不少见（如截图所示），特别是考虑到 CPU 的平均温度约为 75°C，远远低于临界极限。游戏时的表现，尤其是在《Witcher 3 》中的表现，在测试中被证明是比较麻烦的。Radeon 760M 保持了较高的时钟频率，而 Ryzen 5 Pro 7640HS 却降到了 1.4 GHz。惠普应该考虑解决和改进这种做法。

发言人

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 24% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 18%, worst was 35%
Compared to all devices tested
» 14% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 14% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

能源管理

耗电量

Firefly 14 的低功耗特别值得称赞。它的闲置功耗为 3 至 8 瓦，是测试领域中任何竞争对手都无法比拟的出色功耗。在负载情况下，鉴于设备的性能水平，56 至 66 瓦的功耗也值得称赞。此外，随附的 65 瓦电源足以支持该设备。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.5 / Watt
Idle	3 / 4 / 8 Watt
Load	56 / 66 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A R5 PRO 7640HS, Radeon 760M	HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA R9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon 780M	Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	Average of class Workstation
Power Consumption		-42%	-59%	-24%	-146%
Idle Minimum *	3	4.3 -43%	7.8 -160%	4.1 -37%	7.95 ?(2.6 - 19.5, n=26, last 2 years) -165%
Idle Average *	4	10.1 -153%	9.3 -133%	6.6 -65%	12.8 ?(4 - 35.9, n=26, last 2 years) -220%
Idle Maximum *	8	11.2 -40%	9.8 -23%	8 -0%	18.6 ?(5.6 - 47, n=26, last 2 years) -133%
Load Average *	56	64.4 -15%	62.8 -12%	61 -9%	95.5 ?(47.7 - 182, n=26, last 2 years) -71%
Witcher 3 ultra *	58.2	59.4 -2%	46.5 20%	56 4%
Load Maximum *	66	66.7 -1%	96 -45%	90 -36%	158 ?(60.2 - 311, n=26, last 2 years) -139%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stress test

HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø58.2 (57.4-62.1)

HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø61.5 (61-64.2)

HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø4.3 (3.56-8.21)

Power consumption with external monitor

HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø53 (51.7-60.1)

HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø52.3 (49.4-65.2)

HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø57.6 (56.9-60.7)

HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø55.5 (54-57.6)

HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø3.41 (2.85-5.57)

电池寿命

由于能耗低，这款笔记本电脑的电池续航时间非常出色。尽管在同类竞争产品中，它的电池性能不是最强劲的，但它的性能却是迄今为止测试阵容中最强的，在亮度为 150 cd/m2 的条件下，可以浏览约 13 个小时的互联网。

Battery Runtime

WiFi Websurfing

13h 02min

	HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A R5 PRO 7640HS, Radeon 760M, 51 Wh	HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA R9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon 780M, 51 Wh	Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 75 Wh	Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 60 Wh	Average of class Workstation
Battery Runtime		-40%	-40%	-26%	-31%
WiFi v1.3	782	471 -40%	472 -40%	580 -26%	541 ?(252 - 897, n=26, last 2 years) -31%
H.264		557	651	527	717 ?(347 - 1104, n=9, last 2 years)
Load		56	81	124	81.3 ?(55 - 118, n=15, last 2 years)
Reader / Idle				1292	700 ?(319 - 1072, n=5, last 2 years)

Pros

+ 强大的处理器和稳定的 iGPU

+ 稳定而高质量的外壳

+ 一流的电池寿命

+ 出色的输入设备

+ 低能耗

+ 网络摄像头快门

+ 花哨的设计

+ 2x USB 4

Cons

- 响应时间短

- 部分线圈啸叫声大

判决

惠普的 Firefly 14 G10 A 是一款引人注目的办公笔记本电脑，配备 AMD 部件，具有类似工作站的功能。

测试机型配备了 Ryzen 5 Pro 7640HS的测试机型，不仅能效高，性能也令人印象深刻（尤其是 Radeon 760M集成图形处理器）。

强大的硬件被包裹在优雅、坚固和高品质的机身中，机身拥有出色的输入设备和现代化的端口，包括 2x USB 4。其他显著特点还包括出色的电池续航时间和强劲的音频质量。

这款 14 英寸笔记本电脑的辐射会引起不同的反应。尽管线圈发出呜呜声，但在适度负载的情况下，它仍能保持非常安静和凉爽。但是，当负载较重时，小工具就会变得相对嘈杂和发热。此外，显示屏的响应时间还有待改进，这也是惠普可能改进的一个方面。

考虑到上述缺点，Firefly 14 G10 A 无疑是目前市场上最好的办公笔记本。但竞争依然存在，联想（Lenovo）的笔记本电脑就证明了这一点。Yoga 9 14IRP G8）和华为（MateBook X Pro)的竞争，尽管它们的价格略高。

价格和供应情况

经评测的配备 Ryzen 5 Pro 7640HS 的 HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A 目前可在多家在线零售商处购买，例如（Connection）。).

HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A - 2023-10-11 10/11/2023 v7
Florian Glaser

Chassis

88 / 98 → 89%

Keyboard

89%

Pointing Device

89%

Connectivity

66 / 80 → 82%

Weight

69 / 10-66 → 100%

Battery

90 / 95 → 94%

Display

90%

Games Performance

74%

Application Performance

94%

Temperature

83 / 95 → 87%

Noise

83 / 90 → 92%

Audio

79%

Camera

43 / 85 → 50%

Average

80%

87%

Workstation - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Carmen Pol - Translator - 116 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2023

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 391930 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 惠普 ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A 评测：依靠 Zen 4 的强大办公笔记本电脑

Florian Glaser, 2023-10-14 (Update: 2023-10-14)

惠普 ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A 评测：依靠 Zen 4 的强大办公笔记本电脑

潜在的竞争对手比较

尺寸比较

交流

网络摄像头

显示屏

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

性能

处理器

Cinebench R15 Multi Loop

系统性能

DPC 延迟

存储设备

Dauerleistung Lesen: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

图形卡

游戏性能

Witcher 3 FPS chart

排放量

系统噪音

温度

压力测试

发言人

HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A audio analysis

HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA audio analysis

能源管理

耗电量

Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stress test

Power consumption with external monitor

电池寿命

Pros

Cons

判决

价格和供应情况

More articles related to this device

Transparency

Pricecompare