Notebookcheck Logo
Google Pixel 9 smartphone review notebookcheck

谷歌 Pixel 9 评测--谷歌小型智能手机走错了路

告别最棒的相机套件

除了旗舰级 SoC 之外,小巧的 Pixel 9 还拥有令人印象深刻的更新交付时间以及超亮的 OLED 面板。在这篇关于 Pixel 手机的 Notebookcheck 评测中,您可以了解到它是否仍是千元以下智能手机的相机标杆。
Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
5G Android Smartphone Touchscreen

对谷歌 Pixel 9 的评价

在过去的几年里,谷歌的普通 Pixel 系列在所有的照片质量方面都成为了 "经济实惠 "的Android 智能手机的参照标准。该制造商再次将重点放在 Pixel 9 的摄像头上,也不是没有原因的。然而,自 Pixel 7 以来,其从中高档到高档的飞跃仅用了两代产品的时间。尽管 Pixel 9 依然拥有不俗的拍照性能,但不到 1000 美元的售价让竞争对手迅速迎头赶上。尤其是在变焦摄影方面,最新一代的 Pixel 令人失望,其主摄像头也没有比竞争对手的更好,如果有的话,那就是完全相反。

Pixel 9 的优势包括良好的照片质量、超长的运行时间、超亮的 OLED 显示屏和广泛的软件支持。我们还非常喜欢它的全新超声波指纹传感器。Galaxy S24 也具备这些优点,但三星手机的整体性能更好,而且还采用了高端 SoC。尤其是 Pixel 9 内置的 Tensor G4,丝毫不比高通和联发科的竞争对手逊色。此外,Pixel 9 缓慢的充电速度也不是购买这款手机的理由。与前代产品相比,我们希望它在这方面能有更明显的进步,更何况这款机型甚至没有配备电源。

那些对顶级手机感兴趣的人可以从小米 14 或 14T Pro 等手机中获得更强的性能和更快的充电时间。Oneplus 12 也是 Pixel 9 的不错替代品。

Pros

+ 明亮的 OLED 面板
+ 高品质外壳
+ 出色的连接性
+ 超长更新时间
+ 大量 5G 和 4G 频率
+ 良好的主摄像头

Cons

- ...... 锐度不足
- 没有 LTPO 技术
- 无长焦镜头
- 拉登充电慢 + 不含电源
- 节流
- SoC 相当中端
- 宽边框
- 存储缓慢 + 基本版本仅有 128 GB
- 低 PWM

价格和供应情况

谷歌 Pixel 9 基础版的 MRSP 为 799 美元,可通过亚马逊等在线零售商购买。

Amazon Logo
$641.98
Google Pixel 9 - Unlocked Android Smartphone with Gemini, 24-Hour Battery, Advanced Camera, and 6.3" Actua Display - Obsidian - 128 GB
  • $799.00
    Google Pixel 9 Pro - Unlocked Android Smartphone with Gemini, Triple Rear Camera System, 24-Hour Battery, and 6.3" Super Actua Display - Obsidian - 128 GB
  • $7.99
    Supershieldz (3 Pack) Designed for Google Pixel 9 Tempered Glass Screen Protector, Anti Scratch, Bubble Free
Bestpreis 818.99€ PreiswertePC.de
Google Pixel 9 256GB Obsidian (GA05842)
2. 849 € expert TechnoMarkt
3. 849 € Gomibo.de
4. 849 € Alternate

潜在的竞争对手比较

Image
Model / Review
Geizhals
Weight
Drive
Display
1.
84.9%
Google Pixel 9
Google Pixel 9
Google Tensor G4 ⎘
ARM Mali-G715 MP7 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 128 GB 
Bestpreis 818.99€ PreiswertePC.de
2. 849€ expert TechnoMarkt
3. 849€ Gomibo.de
198 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.30"
2424x1080
421 PPI
OLED
2.
89.8% v7 (old)
Xiaomi 14
Xiaomi 14
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 750 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB 
Bestpreis 693€ Gomibo.at
2. 696€ Gomibo.de
3. 696€ computeruniverse.net
193 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.36"
2670x1200
460 PPI
OLED
3.
90% v7 (old)
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400 ⎘
Samsung Xclipse 940 ⎘
8 GB Memory, 256 GB 
Bestpreis 589€ Coolblue
2. 619€ fritzz
3. 619.49€ Mindfactory
167 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.20"
2340x1080
416 PPI
Dynamic AMOLED 2X
4.
88.1%
OnePlus 12
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 750 ⎘
16 GB Memory, 512 GB 
Bestpreis 735€ Proshop.at
2. 735€ Proshop.de
3. 735€ Coolblue
220 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.82"
3168x1440
510 PPI
AMOLED
5.
88.9% v7 (old)
Google Pixel 8
Google Pixel 8
Google Tensor G3 ⎘
ARM Mali-G715 MP7 ⎘
8 GB Memory, 128 GB 
Bestpreis 473.98€ Mindfactory
2. 473.99€ galaxus
3. 478.69€ Jacob Elektronik direkt
187 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.20"
2400x1080
424 PPI
OLED

谷歌推出的第九代小型 Pixel 手机再次将小巧的尺寸与精选的功能完美结合,无需做出任何妥协。今年,Pixel 9 再次使用了 Pro 机型上的许多组件。谷歌 Pixel 9 的核心是全新的 张量 G4与去年的 SoC 相比,理论上只是小幅升级。 去年的 SoC.除此之外,很多方面都没有变化,改进似乎也很有限。不过,Pixel 8 的继任者拥有更多的 RAM(即 12 GB),电池容量也稍大,达到 4,700 mAh。

虽然事实证明,Pixel 9 代的升级幅度有限,而且谷歌去年已经大幅提高了价格,但进入 Pixel 世界的门槛再次大幅上调。基础版本的 Pixel 手机仍然是 128 GB,但现在的 MRSP 为 799 美元。存储容量为 256 GB 的 Pixel 9 版本现在已接近千元大关(MRSP:899 美元)。

Google Pixel 9 (Pixel 9 Series)
Processor
Google Tensor G4 8 x 2 GHz
Graphics adapter
Memory
12 GB 
Display
6.30 inch 20.2:9, 2424 x 1080 pixel 421 PPI, Capacitive Touchscreen, OLED, HDR (HLG, HDR10, HDR10+), glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 109 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer, OTG, Miracast, eSIM
Networking
Wi-Fi 7 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.3, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B2/​B4/​B5/​B6/​B8/​B19), 4G (B1/​B2/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B12/​B13/​B14/​B17/​B18/​B19/​B20/​B21/​B25/​B26/​B28/​B29/​B30/​B32/​B38/​B39/​B40/​B41/​B42/​B48/​B66/​B71/​B75), 5G (n1/​n2/​n3/​n5/​n7/​n8/​n12/​n14/​n20/​n25/​n26/​n28/​n30/​n38/​n40/​n41/​n66/​n71/​n75/​n76/​n77/​n78/​n79), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.5 x 152.8 x 72
Battery
4700 mAh Lithium-Ion
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 14
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (f/​1.68, OIS, 1/1,31", Videos @2160p/​60fps) + 48 MPix (f/​1.7, wide angle lens), camera2 API: Full
Secondary Camera: 10.5 MPix (f/2.2, AF, Videos @2160p/​60fps)
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: OnScreen, USB cable, info material, 24 Months Warranty, DRM Widevine L1, GNSS: GPS (L1, L5), Gonass (L1), Galileo (E,1, E5a), BeiDou (B1, B2a), QZSS, SAR value0.99W/​kg - Head, 1.40W/​kg - Body, BT Codecs: SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX HD, Opus, LDAC, LC3, fanless, waterproof
Weight
198 g
Price
899 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

外壳 - 通过 IP68 认证的 Pixel 9

与 2023 机型相比,Pixel 9 系列的外观略显圆润。 2023 机型略显圆润。此外,来自山景城的制造商还进一步开发了现在的标志性相机栏。即便如此,Pixel 9 依然散发着 Pixel 的基因。其在高端谷歌手机中闻名遐迩的良好制造质量以及 IP68 认证都没有改变。这意味着它的外壳可以完全防尘防水。

谷歌 Pixel 9 的配色
谷歌 Pixel 9 的配色

Pixel 9 有四种不同的颜色,相比之下 像素 8相比,其稍大的 6.3 英寸显示屏变得更宽更高了一些。另一方面,OLED 面板周围的边框变得更薄,从而使最新一代 Pixel 的屏幕与机身尺寸的比例得到改善,即 86.1%。即便如此,与其他制造商的紧凑型手机系列相比,Pixel 9 看起来并不是最现代的--S24、Pixel 9、Pixel 9 Plus、Pixel 9 Plus、Pixel 9 Plus 和 Pixel 9 Plus。 Galaxy S24为例,其屏占比(90.9%)要高得多。

设备的正面和背面都使用了大猩猩玻璃 Victus 2,与缎面金属边框相结合,手感很好,给人一种真正高品质的感觉。不过,这只是在远处欣赏 Pixel 9 时才会出现的情况,因为其光滑的背面在用户手中会变得非常容易沾染指纹。我们更倾向于使用 Pro 机型的磨砂玻璃。虽然彩色版的 Pixel 9 似乎比我们的黑色测试样机更不容易受到这个问题的影响。

黑曜石色的谷歌 Pixel 9
黑曜石色的谷歌 Pixel 9
谷歌 Pixel 9 智能手机评测笔记本检查
谷歌 Pixel 9 智能手机评测笔记本检查
谷歌 Pixel 9 智能手机评测笔记本检查
谷歌 Pixel 9 智能手机评测笔记本检查
谷歌 Pixel 9 智能手机评测笔记本检查

尺寸比较

164.3 mm 75.8 mm 9.2 mm 220 g152.8 mm 72 mm 8.5 mm 198 g152.8 mm 71.5 mm 8.2 mm 193 g150.5 mm 70.8 mm 8.9 mm 187 g147 mm 70.6 mm 7.6 mm 167 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

连接性 - 配备 USB 3.2 接口的谷歌智能手机

Pixel 9 配备了 NFC 芯片,支持 Miracast 和 Google Cast。顶级 Pixel 手机的蓝牙标准仍然是 5.3 版本,因为 Tensor G4 在这方面似乎与前代产品的 SoC 没有区别。为了安全地存储用户数据和密码,Pixel 9 依赖于内部的 Titan M2 芯片,该芯片基于自由 CPU 指令集 RISC-V,可用作硬件安全模块(HSM)。Pixel 9 没有红外测温仪或 UWB 芯片。红外温度计也是 Pro 机型独有的。

我们测试样品的 UFS 3.1 存储容量为 128 GB,在手机交付状态下,用户有 109.5 GB 的可用空间。内部存储无法扩展,但由于有 USB OTG,你可以连接存储介质。在使用三星便携式固态硬盘 T7 时,我们只能通过技术上快速的 USB 标准(3.2 Gen 1)获得 184 Mbit/s的速度,该标准支持将有线图像输出到 HDMI 或 DisplayPort 接口。我们的三星 980 Pro 无法识别,这可能是由于连接的输出功率不够高。连接的存储介质可以使用 FAT、FAT32 或 exFAT 格式化。不过,谷歌手机不支持 NTFS。

顶盖侧面(麦克风)
顶盖侧面(麦克风)
机箱右侧(按钮:开/关、音量)
机箱右侧(按钮:开/关、音量)
机身底部侧面(SIM 卡插槽、麦克风、USB 端口、扬声器)
机身底部侧面(SIM 卡插槽、麦克风、USB 端口、扬声器)
箱体左侧
箱体左侧

软件 - Pixel 9 的 7 年更新

根据制造商的说法,Pixel 9 将在七年内收到操作系统和安全更新,这确实令人印象深刻。不过,目前这一代 Pixel 在交付时仍然安装的是Android 14,这是去年推出的,而不是即将推出的后续版本。在测试时,它的安全补丁是从 2024 年 9 月开始的,每月推出一次。

与其他厂商一样,Pixel 9 当然也没有忽视人工智能。除了 Circle to Search 等 AI 功能外,内部助理 Gemini 也是为了让谷歌手机更智能。如果你愿意,还可以购买 Gemini Advanced 的付费订阅包(MRSP:25 美元),享受更强大的 AI 模型,完成编码等复杂任务。

谷歌 Pixel 9 智能手机评测笔记本检查
谷歌 Pixel 9 智能手机评测笔记本检查
谷歌 Pixel 9 智能手机评测笔记本检查
谷歌 Pixel 9 智能手机评测笔记本检查

可持续性

谷歌不仅在手机的长更新周期上体现了其可持续发展意识,而且在生产过程中使用的材料上也体现了这一点。制造商没有提供确切的二氧化碳排放值,但表示产品重量的至少 20% 是由可回收材料制成的。其中回收铝(12%)所占比例最大。包装盒使用的材料是 100% 的可回收材料。交付给客户的 Pixel 9 包装也不含塑料。

通信与全球导航卫星系统 - 配备 5G 技术的谷歌手机

事实证明,Pixel 9 在无线标准方面面向未来--无论是在家中使用还是在外出时使用。它支持 Wi-Fi 7,包括 6 GHz WLAN,与华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 参考路由器配合使用,传输速率非常高且稳定。

在移动互联网接入方面,这款谷歌手机支持 5G 和 4G 网络,并拥有广泛的频率覆盖范围。Pixel 9 的设置非常适合在德国使用,但用户在更远的地方也应该不会遇到连接问题。对 30 个 LTE 频段的支持几乎等同于全球手机。

Networking
Google Pixel 9
iperf3 receive AXE11000
911 (min: 857) MBit/s ∼49%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
955 (min: 739) MBit/s ∼56%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1855 (min: 1826) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1851 (min: 886) MBit/s ∼100%
Xiaomi 14
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1623 (min: 1502) MBit/s ∼87%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1716 (min: 1119) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1738 (min: 1597) MBit/s ∼94%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1737 (min: 873) MBit/s ∼94%
Samsung Galaxy S24
iperf3 receive AXE11000
774 (min: 699) MBit/s ∼42%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
913 (min: 688) MBit/s ∼53%
OnePlus 12
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1857 (min: 1766) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1119 (min: 1086) MBit/s ∼65%
Google Pixel 8
iperf3 receive AXE11000
891 (min: 440) MBit/s ∼48%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
867 (min: 459) MBit/s ∼51%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1570 (min: 1043) MBit/s ∼85%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1521 (min: 1325) MBit/s ∼82%
Average of class Smartphone
iperf3 receive AXE11000
719 (min: 34.8) MBit/s ∼39%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
736 (min: 40.5) MBit/s ∼43%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1451 (min: 229) MBit/s ∼78%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1385 (min: 668) MBit/s ∼75%
095190285380475570665760855950104511401235133014251520161517101805Tooltip
Google Pixel 9 Google Tensor G4, ARM Mali-G715 MP7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1855 (1826-1894)
Google Pixel 8 Google Tensor G3, ARM Mali-G715 MP7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1570 (1043-1725)
Google Pixel 9 Google Tensor G4, ARM Mali-G715 MP7; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1821 (886-1889)
Google Pixel 8 Google Tensor G3, ARM Mali-G715 MP7; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1520 (1325-1685)
Google Pixel 9 Google Tensor G4, ARM Mali-G715 MP7; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø910 (857-930)
Google Pixel 8 Google Tensor G3, ARM Mali-G715 MP7; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø876 (440-911)
Google Pixel 9 Google Tensor G4, ARM Mali-G715 MP7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø955 (739-994)
Google Pixel 8 Google Tensor G3, ARM Mali-G715 MP7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø852 (459-948)
室内定位服务
室内定位服务
外部定位服务
外部定位服务

Pixel 9 的定位功能在室外非常快速准确。在建筑物内部,它的精确度虽然没有那么高,但仍然可以称得上不错。它支持双频 GNSS,包括所有全球卫星导航系统和 NavIC。

为了在实践中测试其定位服务的准确性,我们带着测试样品进行了一次短途自行车旅行,并用 Garmin Venu 2 记录了我们的路线,以进行比较。我们总体上喜欢 Pixel 9 的定位能力,但在测试过程中也出现了一些偏差。我们选择的路线经常会被谷歌手机甩在后面。尽管如此,Pixel 9 仍然可以毫不犹豫地用于汽车导航任务。

Garmin Venu 2 与 Pixel 9 的对比
Garmin Venu 2 与 Pixel 9 的对比

电话功能和通话质量 - Pixel 9 支持 eSIM 卡

谷歌 Pixel 9 智能手机评测笔记本检查
谷歌 Pixel 9 智能手机评测笔记本检查

Pixel 9 支持双 SIM 卡,但前提是用户必须在系统中集成一张 eSIM 卡,因为 SIM 卡插槽只能容纳一张卡。您也可以通过手机设置连接两个 eSIM 卡。

将手机放在耳边,通话质量感觉很自然,大部分背景噪音都能被可靠地过滤掉。通话既可以使用 WLAN 网络,也可以通过 LTE 网络进行。谷歌还为 VoWiFi 和 VoLTE 提供了所谓的 "水晶般清晰的通话 "功能,可以提高噪音过滤效果。根据谷歌的说法,声音数据是在 Pixel 9 本身进行处理的。

摄像头 - 配备光学防抖功能的谷歌智能手机

谷歌 Pixel 9 的自拍照
谷歌 Pixel 9 的自拍照

Pixel 8Pixel 9 配备了分辨率为 1050 万像素的 f/2.2 自拍摄像头。前置镜头现在可以使用自动对焦功能,这在以前是为 专业机型.拍摄效果清晰锐利,细节丰富,但就我们的口味而言,谷歌在锐化和饱和度方面做得有点过头了。视频最多只能以 60fps 的超高清速度录制,而 HDR 的录制速度则限制在 30fps。

关于背面的摄像头,Pixel 9 现在使用了与 Pro 机型相同的主镜头和超广角镜头,只是少了一个长焦镜头。后者导致 Pixel 9 上的变焦镜头只有在传感器裁剪范围(2 倍)内才能使用。此外,谷歌手机的放大倍率已经达到了 8 倍的极限。

0.6x
0.6x
1x
1x
2x
2x
5x
5x
8 倍(最大值)
8 倍(最大值)

另一方面,光圈为 f/1.7 的 5000 万像素主摄像头可拍摄出色彩自然的优质照片。在我们看来,1/1.31 英寸的传感器与谷歌的后期处理技术相结合,在照片质量方面是同类产品中最好的吗?Pixel 9 暴露出的缺点实在太多了。边缘明显模糊的现象尤为明显。虽然曝光效果不错,照片也没有人为增亮,但谷歌手机也容易 "吞没 "一些细节,例如湖边照片(测试照片 2)中一些房屋的屋顶瓦片。

弱光照片的照明效果不错,清晰度也不差。如果 Pixel 9 的价格还在Pixel 7 (MRSP:665 美元)的范围内,我们就没什么可批评的了,但对于一款 800 美元的手机来说,它在弱光下的柔焦效果相当明显。Galaxy S24 在这方面明显做得更好,尽管差异并不明显。

Pixel 可以 60fps 的速度录制超高清视频,但没有 8K 选项。另一方面,它的防抖和自动对焦功能非常出色。

谷歌 Pixel 9 智能手机评测笔记本检查
谷歌 Pixel 9 智能手机评测笔记本检查
谷歌 Pixel 9 智能手机评测笔记本检查
谷歌 Pixel 9 智能手机评测笔记本检查
谷歌 Pixel 9 智能手机评测笔记本检查

在超广角摄像头方面,谷歌将前代产品的 1200 万像素镜头换成了 4800 万像素镜头,配备更大的 1/2.55 英寸传感器和更亮的 f/1.7 光圈。这使得 Pixel 9 的画质达到了顶级水平。谷歌手机的图像错误很少,动态范围也很好。不过,我们对其图像边缘的锐利度并不完全满意,有时竞争对手对细节的捕捉更胜一筹。

如果你愿意,可以使用众多 AI 功能进行后期处理。名为 Magic Editor 的智能图像和视频编辑功能可用于此目的。除其他功能外,它还可以更改照片背景或删除元素。添加我 "功能可确保使用增强现实技术多次录制合影,这样所有的人都会出现在一个镜头中。另一项新功能是 "最佳图像部分",这是为已拍摄的照片生成新图像部分的选项。您还可以使用生成式人工智能扩展照片。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Wide-angleWide-angleLow lightUltra-wide angle5x Zoom
orginal image
click to load images

在可控的照明条件下,我们将主摄像头的色彩表现与实际参考色彩进行了对比分析。除了智能手机经常出现的变亮现象外,Pixel 9 在描绘 ColorChecker 通行证时没有出现任何重大偏差,白平衡也很稳定。只有在描绘青色时,这款高级手机才会出现色彩异常值(>10)。

ColorChecker
8.6 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
3 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Google Pixel 9: 6.45 ∆E min: 2.47 - max: 10.78 ∆E
ColorChecker
16.1 ∆E
21.3 ∆E
17.2 ∆E
21.2 ∆E
20.3 ∆E
27.9 ∆E
23.8 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
15.5 ∆E
12.5 ∆E
30.5 ∆E
30.8 ∆E
11 ∆E
26.7 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
24.1 ∆E
18.2 ∆E
22.8 ∆E
23 ∆E
22.6 ∆E
24.4 ∆E
24.1 ∆E
21.1 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Google Pixel 9: 20.52 ∆E min: 11.01 - max: 30.82 ∆E

配件和保修 - Pixel 9 缺少一个电源供应器

Pixel 9 的可选保护套
Pixel 9 的可选保护套

开箱后,Pixel 9 没有安装屏幕保护膜,交付范围非常有限。谷歌手机附带了一条 USB-C 至 USB-C 连接线(USB 2.0),但除此之外,只包括必备的宣传单和 SIM 卡工具。您可以选择购买其他配件,如 45 瓦电源(MRSP:29.99 美元)和各种保护套。

在美国,Pixel 9 享有 12 个月的标准保修服务。你可以通过谷歌官方商店购买额外的保修服务,2 年的保修服务费用为 159 美元,或者你也可以注册一个月租计划,费用为 8 美元。谷歌与 iFixit 合作已有数年。在测试期间,更换电池和工具的价格约为 45 美元。

输入设备和操作 - 配备面部解锁功能的谷歌手机

安装的 160 毫米 Actua 全屏显示屏刷新率为 120 Hz,使网站上的动画和滚动看起来非常流畅。OLED 面板上的输入可以快速、准确地直接输入到触摸屏的边角。Pixel 手机内部的线性振动电机(Z 轴)也确保了愉悦的打字体验。

另一方面,按键的位置需要一些时间来适应--至少如果用户是从其他制造商的产品换到 Pixel 手机的话。这些按键采用了典型的谷歌排列方式,开/关机键位于音量摇杆上方。相比之下,Pixel 9 的指纹传感器几乎不需要适应。它首次采用了超声波技术,响应速度非常快。传感器的识别率也同样出色,而且位置很高。

前置摄像头利用面部数据提供生物识别安全功能。在光线良好的条件下,解锁速度也很快,但这种面部识别依赖于二维过程,安全性较低。

谷歌 Pixel 9 智能手机评测笔记本检查
谷歌 Pixel 9 智能手机评测笔记本检查
谷歌 Pixel 9 智能手机评测笔记本检查

显示屏 - 谷歌 Pixel 9 采用 OLED 显示屏

OLED 显示屏基于 RG/BG 子像素矩阵,每个子像素由一个红色、一个蓝色和一个绿色发光二极管组成。
OLED 显示屏基于 RG/BG 子像素矩阵,每个子像素由一个红色、一个蓝色和一个绿色发光二极管组成。

Pixel 9 的 6.3 英寸 OLED 面板分辨率为 1080p,ppi 为 422,长宽比为 20:9。谷歌手机不支持根据显示内容调整动态刷新率;目前只有 Pro 机型受益于 LTPO 技术。面板运行频率仅为 60 Hz。另外,也可以通过选择 "平滑模式 "将刷新率调整为 120 Hz。

Pixel 9 在亮度方面表现出色。在我们的测量中,谷歌手机在激活环境光传感器并显示纯白色显示屏的情况下,亮度高达 2,063 cd/m²,几乎打破了记录。相比之下,它的光照是不均匀的,这对于 OLED 面板来说是非常不典型的。我们测量到,在显示明亮和黑暗区域(APL18 模式)时,亮度高达 2,844 cd/m²,而在 HDR 播放时,亮度高达 2,793 cd/m²。因此,我们的结果完全符合制造商的规格要求(最高 2,700 cd/m²)。

1984
cd/m²
2049
cd/m²
1729
cd/m²
1950
cd/m²
2063
cd/m²
1769
cd/m²
1908
cd/m²
2051
cd/m²
1724
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 2063 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1914.1 cd/m² Minimum: 2.02 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 84 %
Center on Battery: 2063 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.7 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 1.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.23
Google Pixel 9
OLED, 2424x1080, 6.3"
Xiaomi 14
OLED, 2670x1200, 6.4"
Samsung Galaxy S24
Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 2340x1080, 6.2"
OnePlus 12
AMOLED, 3168x1440, 6.8"
Google Pixel 8
OLED, 2400x1080, 6.2"
Screen
-37%
-108%
-52%
-45%
Brightness middle
2063
1043
-49%
1349
-35%
1026
-50%
1450
-30%
Brightness
1914
1052
-45%
1369
-28%
991
-48%
1410
-26%
Brightness Distribution
84
96
14%
97
15%
91
8%
92
10%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
0.7
1.1
-57%
3.3
-371%
1.19
-70%
1.1
-57%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
2.2
2.8
-27%
5
-127%
3.3
-50%
4.2
-91%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.2
1.9
-58%
2.4
-100%
2.4
-100%
2.1
-75%
Gamma
2.23 99%
2.23 99%
1.97 112%
2.24 98%
2.24 98%
CCT
6524 100%
6740 96%
6635 98%
6920 94%
6584 99%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.5

* ... smaller is better

由于采用了 OLED 技术,谷歌依靠脉宽调制来控制屏幕亮度。不过,谷歌并没有采用像小米智能手机那样的 PWM 调光方式,而是采用了高频闪烁(3845 Hz)的 OLED 显示屏。在 Pixel 9 上,我们使用示波器测得的频率为 120 Hz,虽然很低,但很稳定。因此,对显示屏闪烁敏感的人应该会有怨言。超过 22% 的振幅偏差并不能改变这种情况--对于 120 Hz 的面板来说,低于 20% 的数值是最理想的。该值偏离 0% 的幅度越大,亮度控制的变化就越有可能引起负面注意。

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 120 Hz
Amplitude: 22.22 %

The display backlight flickers at 120 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 120 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

最低显示亮度
分钟
25 % 显示屏亮度
25 %
显示屏亮度为 50
50 %
75 % 显示亮度
75 %
最大手动显示亮度
100 %

固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置下的测量系列(最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来很平,但这是缩放造成的。信息框显示的是最小亮度下的振幅放大图)。

在调整显示屏校准选项方面,谷歌手机也没有展现出它最好的一面。两个预设配置文件并不丰富,但对大多数人来说可能已经足够。不过,令人遗憾的是,白平衡在两种模式下都无法调整。用户界面应该在 2024 年提供这一选项。

使用 "自然 "模式,色彩显示非常准确,灰度偏差也令人印象深刻。我们测得没有明显偏色。

色彩准确度(配置文件:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩准确度(配置文件:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩空间(配置文件:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩空间(配置文件:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
灰度(配置文件:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
灰度(配置文件:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩饱和度(配置文件:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩饱和度(配置文件:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
1.04 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.5335 ms rise
↘ 0.502 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.55 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.9135 ms rise
↘ 0.6375 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

外观方面,Pixel 9 得益于其 OLED 面板的高亮度,给人留下了一流的印象。谷歌手机拥有足够的亮度储备,能够应对任何光线环境。反光几乎不会影响其可读性。需要注意的是,在未激活环境光传感器的情况下,其最大亮度 "仅 "为 1,017 cd/m²。

即使在平视时,色彩也能保持稳定和鲜艳,亮度损失也控制在一定范围内。

谷歌 Pixel 9 智能手机评测笔记本检查
谷歌 Pixel 9 智能手机评测笔记本检查
谷歌 Pixel 9 智能手机评测笔记本检查

性能--Pixel 9 内置的张量 SoC 存在缺陷

正如你对 Pixel 手机所期待的那样,它配备了一款 内置 SoC.根据制造商的说法,Tensor 芯片组是专门为优化人工智能性能而开发的。我们的人工智能基准测试也证实了这一点,这款手机的性能值很高。不过,就纯 CPU 性能而言,Pixel 9 在这个价格范围内显得相当一般。Tensor G4 甚至无法与当前的高端 SoC 相媲美,尤其是在 Geekbench 多核测试中。A 骁龙 8 代 3联发科 Dimensity 9300+要强大得多。

谷歌认为,自己的芯片组不应在基准测试中占主导地位,而应在日常可用性和用户体验方面表现出色。不过,我们也注意到 Pixel 9 在这方面略有不足。在我们的测试过程中,偶尔会出现(不可重现的)图形错误,例如在打开设置菜单时,只出现了一个没有内容的白色背景。谷歌手机加载复杂应用程序(如游戏)的时间也比小米 14T Pro 长一秒。 小米 14T Pro.

Geekbench 6.3
Single-Core
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
2148 Points +19%
Xiaomi 14
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
2144 Points +19%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
2045 Points +14%
Average Google Tensor G4
  (1798 - 1982, n=4)
1925 Points +7%
Google Pixel 9
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
1798 Points
Google Pixel 8
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
1653 Points -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (193 - 3479, n=165, last 2 years)
1478 Points -18%
Multi-Core
Xiaomi 14
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
6914 Points +54%
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
6630 Points +47%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
6456 Points +43%
Average Google Tensor G4
  (4501 - 4820, n=4)
4650 Points +3%
Google Pixel 9
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
4501 Points
Google Pixel 8
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
4225 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (845 - 10401, n=165, last 2 years)
4126 Points -8%
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Xiaomi 14
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1684 Points +18%
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
1672 Points +17%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
1553 Points +9%
Google Pixel 9
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
1423 Points
Average Google Tensor G4
  (1372 - 1423, n=3)
1390 Points -2%
Google Pixel 8
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
1260 Points -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (126 - 2437, n=174, last 2 years)
1021 Points -28%
Multi-Core
Xiaomi 14
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
6307 Points +77%
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
6088 Points +71%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
5561 Points +56%
Average Google Tensor G4
  (3563 - 3874, n=3)
3741 Points +5%
Google Pixel 9
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
3563 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 8816, n=174, last 2 years)
3404 Points -4%
Google Pixel 8
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
3395 Points -5%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
2005881 Points +96%
Xiaomi 14
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1980553 Points +94%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
1616403 Points +58%
Average of class Smartphone
  (142748 - 3015111, n=101, last 2 years)
1259783 Points +23%
Average Google Tensor G4
  (1022007 - 1322101, n=3)
1161163 Points +14%
Google Pixel 8
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
1107295 Points +8%
Google Pixel 9
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
1022007 Points
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
17763 Points +27%
Xiaomi 14
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
17620 Points +26%
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
15690 Points +12%
Google Pixel 9
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
13948 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (4609 - 26863, n=191, last 2 years)
13055 Points -6%
Average Google Tensor G4
  (11823 - 13948, n=4)
12986 Points -7%
Google Pixel 8
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
10897 Points -22%
CrossMark - Overall
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
1304 Points +37%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
1256 Points +32%
Xiaomi 14
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1165 Points +23%
Average Google Tensor G4
  (951 - 1102, n=4)
1039 Points +9%
Google Pixel 8
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
955 Points 0%
Google Pixel 9
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
951 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (187 - 2044, n=160, last 2 years)
894 Points -6%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
10522 Points +53%
Xiaomi 14
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
10370 Points +50%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
9287 Points +35%
Average Google Tensor G4
  (6894 - 7716, n=3)
7416 Points +8%
Google Pixel 8
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
6974 Points +1%
Google Pixel 9
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
6894 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 11976, n=154, last 2 years)
6363 Points -8%
System
Xiaomi 14
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
15741 Points +107%
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
14531 Points +91%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
14406 Points +90%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 16475, n=154, last 2 years)
10203 Points +34%
Google Pixel 8
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
8251 Points +9%
Average Google Tensor G4
  (7593 - 8038, n=3)
7887 Points +4%
Google Pixel 9
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
7593 Points
Memory
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
11357 Points +32%
Xiaomi 14
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
11252 Points +31%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
10193 Points +19%
Average Google Tensor G4
  (8573 - 10197, n=3)
9598 Points +12%
Google Pixel 8
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
9115 Points +6%
Google Pixel 9
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
8573 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 12716, n=154, last 2 years)
6843 Points -20%
Graphics
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
38959 Points +86%
Xiaomi 14
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
31876 Points +52%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
26783 Points +28%
Average Google Tensor G4
  (20938 - 23041, n=3)
21902 Points +5%
Google Pixel 9
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
20938 Points
Google Pixel 8
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
18975 Points -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1017 - 58651, n=154, last 2 years)
17343 Points -17%
Web
Xiaomi 14
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
2048 Points +24%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
1908 Points +16%
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
1907 Points +16%
Average Google Tensor G4
  (1648 - 1983, n=3)
1837 Points +11%
Google Pixel 8
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
1657 Points +1%
Google Pixel 9
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
1648 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (841 - 2145, n=154, last 2 years)
1569 Points -5%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Average Google Tensor G4
  (35227 - 36578, n=3)
35951 Points +2%
Google Pixel 9
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
35227 Points
Google Pixel 8
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
25563 Points -27%
Xiaomi 14
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
18370 Points -48%
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
18127 Points -49%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1267 - 75143, n=146, last 2 years)
17392 Points -51%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
11574 Points -67%
AImark - Score v3.x
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 307528, n=138, last 2 years)
25706 Points +2851%
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
1473 Points +69%
Xiaomi 14
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1381 Points +59%
Average Google Tensor G4
  (871 - 1434, n=3)
1150 Points +32%
Google Pixel 8
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
1136 Points +30%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
1134 Points +30%
Google Pixel 9
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
871 Points
Geekbench AI
Single Precision TensorFlow NNAPI
Average of class Smartphone
  (191 - 4619, n=35, last 2 years)
845 Points +10%
Google Pixel 9
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
771 Points
Average Google Tensor G4
  (376 - 771, n=4)
500 Points -35%
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
488 Points -37%
Half Precision TensorFlow NNAPI
Google Pixel 9
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
4666 Points
Average Google Tensor G4
  (4176 - 4754, n=4)
4480 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (192 - 32432, n=35, last 2 years)
4196 Points -10%
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
487 Points -90%
Quantized TensorFlow NNAPI
Google Pixel 9
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
6451 Points
Average Google Tensor G4
  (6269 - 6451, n=4)
6333 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (118 - 44657, n=35, last 2 years)
5989 Points -7%
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
1128 Points -83%

在图形处理器性能方面,ARM Mali-G715 MP7 ARM Mali-G715 MP7之间的差距变得更大,甚至比 CPU 测试中的差距更加明显。有时 小米 14在 GFXBench 中的表现比谷歌手机高出 50%。

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4729 Points +82%
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4331 Points +67%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3933 Points +51%
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2601 Points
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2439 Points -6%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4744 Points +85%
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4444 Points +73%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3902 Points +52%
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2567 Points
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2422 Points -6%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
19319 Points +115%
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
17681 Points +96%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
12652 Points +41%
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8998 Points
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8977 Points 0%
3DMark / Wild Life Score
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8909 Points
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8635 Points -3%
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
Points -100%
3DMark / Solar Bay Score
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
8264 Points
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
8237 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6649 Points
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points
3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
8689 Points
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
8017 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6673 Points
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1598 Points +56%
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1023 Points
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1667 Points +54%
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1083 Points
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
121 fps +1%
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps 0%
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
119 fps -1%
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -50%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
539 fps +29%
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
538 fps +28%
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
419 fps
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
403 fps -4%
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
317 fps -24%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
121 fps +1%
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
119 fps -1%
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
78 fps -35%
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -50%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
331 fps +29%
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
294 fps +14%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
289 fps +12%
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
257 fps
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
97 fps -62%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
121 fps +2%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +1%
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
65 fps -45%
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -50%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
264 fps +58%
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
231 fps +38%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
214 fps +28%
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
167 fps
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
92 fps -45%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
110 fps +47%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
105 fps +40%
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
75 fps
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -20%
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
58 fps -23%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
156 fps +95%
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
147 fps +84%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
131 fps +64%
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
80 fps
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
74 fps -7%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
105 fps +59%
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
93 fps +41%
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
66 fps
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -9%
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
56 fps -15%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
84 fps +110%
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
78 fps +95%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
69 fps +73%
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
40 fps
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
37 fps -7%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
121 fps +21%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
118 fps +18%
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
100 fps
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
75 fps -25%
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -40%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
207 fps +92%
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
188 fps +74%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
153 fps +42%
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
108 fps
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99 fps -8%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
38 fps +100%
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
35 fps +84%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
32 fps +68%
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
19 fps
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
16 fps -16%

由于 Pixel 9 的计算能力在同类产品中是最低的,因此谷歌的顶级设备在浏览器基准测试中没有取得第一名的成绩也就不足为奇了。主观而言,浏览速度仍然很快,没有明显的延迟。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Xiaomi 14 (Chrome 120.0.6099.210)
215.569 Points +101%
OnePlus 12 (Chrome 126)
215.5 Points +101%
Samsung Galaxy S24 (Chrome 122)
128.638 Points +20%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=164, last 2 years)
121.7 Points +13%
Average Google Tensor G4 (107.5 - 117.5, n=3)
111.1 Points +3%
Google Pixel 9 (Chrome 129)
107.467 Points
Google Pixel 8 (chrome 116)
104.25 Points -3%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
OnePlus 12 (Chrome 126)
289 runs/min +56%
Samsung Galaxy S24 (Chrome 122)
267 runs/min +44%
Xiaomi 14 (Chrome 120.0.6099.210)
264 runs/min +43%
Average Google Tensor G4 (182 - 207, n=3)
191.3 runs/min +3%
Google Pixel 9 (Chrome 129)
185 runs/min
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=150, last 2 years)
139.5 runs/min -25%
Google Pixel 8 (chrome 116)
136 runs/min -26%
Speedometer 3.0 - Score
Average Google Tensor G4 (14.9 - 15.8, n=3)
15.2 runs/min +2%
OnePlus 12 (Chrome 126)
14.9 runs/min 0%
Google Pixel 9 (Chrome 129)
14.9 runs/min
Xiaomi 14 (Chrome 122)
11.6 runs/min -22%
Average of class Smartphone (1.03 - 34, n=61, last 2 years)
11.2 runs/min -25%
Google Pixel 8 (Chrome 122)
9.37 runs/min -37%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
OnePlus 12 (Chrome 126)
212 Points +106%
Xiaomi 14 (Chrome 120.0.6099.210)
196 Points +90%
Samsung Galaxy S24 (Chrome 122)
176 Points +71%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 271, n=155, last 2 years)
114.5 Points +11%
Average Google Tensor G4 (103 - 112, n=3)
107 Points +4%
Google Pixel 9 (Chrome 129)
103 Points
Google Pixel 8 (chrome 116)
94 Points -9%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi 14 (Chrome 120.0.6099.210)
68454 Points +21%
OnePlus 12 (Chrome 126)
68223 Points +20%
Samsung Galaxy S24 (Chrome 122)
63748 Points +12%
Average Google Tensor G4 (56737 - 62374, n=4)
60391 Points +6%
Google Pixel 9
56737 Points
Google Pixel 8 (chrome 116)
47776 Points -16%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=204, last 2 years)
37721 Points -34%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=163, last 2 years)
1551 ms * -108%
Google Pixel 8 (chrome 116)
998 ms * -34%
Google Pixel 9 (Chrome 129)
744.57 ms *
Average Google Tensor G4 (699 - 745, n=3)
718 ms * +4%
Samsung Galaxy S24 (Chrome 122)
662.3 ms * +11%
OnePlus 12 (Chrome 126)
624.1 ms * +16%
Xiaomi 14 (Chrome 120.0.6099.210)
623.9 ms * +16%

* ... smaller is better

Pixel 9 在存储连接性方面给人带来了惊喜--但不幸的是,它又是以一种相当负面的方式出现的。这款谷歌手机(很可能)仍然采用 UFS 3.1 标准--谷歌尚未提供确切细节。它的读取率与前代 前代但 Pixel 9 的写入速度极低。读取速度低的原因可能是 Tensor SoC 的内存控制器造成的,但这不可能是写入速度低的原因。

Google Pixel 9Xiaomi 14Samsung Galaxy S24OnePlus 12Google Pixel 8Average 128 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
339%
156%
378%
59%
48%
131%
Sequential Read 256KB
1584.56
3385.74
114%
3701.23
134%
3297.57
108%
1655.48
4%
Sequential Write 256KB
256.48
2906.65
1033%
1435.39
460%
3246.21
1166%
895.86
249%
Random Read 4KB
226.41
420.99
86%
373.12
65%
438.5
94%
183.55
-19%
Random Write 4KB
266.19
594.78
123%
175.98
-34%
652.8
145%
266.68
0%

游戏 - Pixel 9 可以玩游戏

我们在使用GameBench 应用程序记录帧速率时遇到的问题这几乎是 Pixel 手机的传统。不过,在谷歌手机上玩游戏还是很有可能的。我们测试的Android 游戏运行流畅,没有任何明显的问题。即使是图形要求较高的《源氏冲击》,在高图形设置下也能运行良好--可以激活Android 上的最高 60fps。游戏《PUBG Mobile》可以激活 UHD 模式,甚至在低细节下也能达到 "极限 "帧率。这在理论上应该可以达到 90fps。由于 Mali-G715 MP7在 Pixel 9 中不支持光线追踪,因此它在游戏方面的前景值得怀疑。

一旦我们解决了录制过程中的问题,我们将提供 Pixel 9 的准确帧率。

Geshin Impact
Geshin Impact
死亡扳机 2
死亡扳机 2
PUBG 手机
PUBG 手机

排放物 - 谷歌手机温度过低

温度

Pixel 9 的机箱表面温度一直处于可控范围内;在使用 Burnout 基准的负载情况下,我们测得的废热约为 43 摄氏度,相当低。不过,在 3DMark 压力测试中,这导致系统性能适度下降了约 20% 至 30%。

Max. Load
 43 °C43.2 °C40.3 °C 
 42.1 °C43.1 °C40.1 °C 
 42 °C41.7 °C39.7 °C 
Maximum: 43.2 °C
Average: 41.7 °C
38.5 °C41.3 °C41.2 °C
38 °C40.2 °C40 °C
36.8 °C39.5 °C38.5 °C
Maximum: 41.3 °C
Average: 39.3 °C
Room Temperature 21.4 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 41.7 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.2 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.3 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.7 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Steel Nomad Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
75.5 % +10%
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
68.5 %
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
71.3 %
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
57 % -20%
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
78.5 %
0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
Google Pixel 9 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø13.2 (10.9-15.3)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø17.9 (14.7-25.8)
Google Pixel 9 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø46.2 (36.3-53.1)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø73 (66.2-87.7)
Google Pixel 9 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø52.2 (45.1-55.7)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø76.6 (62-85.7)
Google Pixel 9 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø6.79 (5.95-7.59)

发言人

Pixel 9 使用两个扬声器,其中一个位于耳罩内侧,因此没有等效的立体声。声音相当饱满,但粉红噪声测量中的阶梯形频率曲线并不理想。对于一款设计紧凑的智能手机来说,谷歌手机的低音和重低音都很清晰。

如果你想要外部声音输出,可以使用有线 USB 端口或无线蓝牙 5.3。后者依赖于大量的编解码器。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.237.82526.831.53123.6214022.326.85027.5336320.523.98020.724.610019.328.212515.735.916013.655.720016.255.425015.553.731515.155.840010.961.65009.969.563012.166.680014.172.2100014.275.6125012.974.6160014.271.3200012.772.2250012.771315013.575.8400013.180.3500013.180.5630013.478.3800012.772.21000013.471.31250013.473.21600013.163.2SPL25.487.7N0.771.4median 13.4median 71.3Delta1.17.638.439.631.239.125.129.629.932.132.137.623.133.523.63422.433.316.839.316.550.513.45414.153.512.954.31357.211.768.111.671.712.97613.377.213.176.312.473.812.673.512.571.912.475.712.778.413.181.413.579.713.678.213.478.113.681.313.474.425890.677.6median 13.1median 74.41.29.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseGoogle Pixel 9Google Pixel 8
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Google Pixel 9 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 21% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Google Pixel 8 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 23% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池续航时间 - Pixel 9 的充电速度仍然很慢

耗电量

Pixel 9 在负载和空闲模式下的功耗都不高。闲置模式下的功耗接近 1.5 瓦,当然仍有一定的优化空间,尽管其明亮的显示屏会在这方面做出重大贡献。

它的电池容量为 4,700 毫安时,使用数据线充电时的功率可达 27 瓦。这已经不算快了,但如果没有合适的电源装置,日常使用时充电功率可能会更低。制造商没有说明 Pixel 9 支持哪些标准;在我们的测试中,我们使用一个电源箱(PD 3.0,最大功率 100 瓦)为电池充电大约需要 2 个小时。我们试用了三种不同的电源适配器(功率在 18 瓦到 30 瓦之间),结果发现 Pixel 9 几乎需要连接电源 3 个小时。不过,我们无法测试它在使用谷歌原装电源时的表现。使用 Qi 标准进行无线充电的功率可达 15 瓦。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.02 / 0.1 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.66 / 1.49 / 1.78 Watt
Load midlight 7.44 / 16.64 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Google Pixel 9
4700 mAh
Xiaomi 14
4610 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S24
4000 mAh
OnePlus 12
5400 mAh
Google Pixel 8
4575 mAh
Average Google Tensor G4
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
27%
2%
-7%
23%
-12%
6%
Idle Minimum *
0.66
0.51
23%
0.42
36%
1.3
-97%
0.56
15%
0.753 ?(0.48 - 1.28, n=4)
-14%
Idle Average *
1.49
0.89
40%
0.93
38%
0.95
36%
1.08
28%
1.778 ?(1.1 - 2.99, n=4)
-19%
Idle Maximum *
1.78
0.92
48%
1.07
40%
1.12
37%
1.17
34%
2.04 ?(1.2 - 3.32, n=4)
-15%
Load Average *
7.44
9.08
-22%
15.43
-107%
10.55
-42%
8.01
-8%
Load Maximum *
16.64
9.11
45%
16.51
1%
11.72
30%
8.89
47%
18.8 ?(16.6 - 20.4, n=3)
-13%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910111213Tooltip
Google Pixel 9 Google Tensor G4; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø6.43 (0.81-13.9)
Google Pixel 8 Google Tensor G3; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø4.63 (0.824-8.03)
Google Pixel 9 Google Tensor G4; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.645 (0.596-0.931)
Google Pixel 8 Google Tensor G3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.683 (0.654-0.835)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

012345678Tooltip
Google Pixel 9 Google Tensor G4; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø8.15 (7.27-8.9)
Google Pixel 8 Google Tensor G3; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø6.05 (4.07-6.98)
Google Pixel 9 Google Tensor G4; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.645 (0.596-0.931)
Google Pixel 8 Google Tensor G3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.683 (0.654-0.835)

运行时间

作为一款紧凑型智能手机,Pixel 9 的运行时间非常出色。在调整显示屏亮度(150 cd/m²)的情况下,可以进行最佳比较。在这种情况下,谷歌手机的续航时间比其前代产品延长了三个小时。 前代产品在使用 Wi-Fi 上网时。实际上,我们的测试设备在无 Wi-Fi 无休止播放视频时的续航时间更长,但 Pixel 9 是个例外,它的续航时间约为 16 小时。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
34h 58min
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 129)
16h 30min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
16h 17min
Load (maximum brightness)
3h 52min
Google Pixel 9
4700 mAh
Xiaomi 14
4610 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S24
4000 mAh
OnePlus 12
5400 mAh
Google Pixel 8
4575 mAh
Battery Runtime
35%
-1%
35%
-5%
Reader / Idle
2098
2926
39%
2398
14%
1965
-6%
1493
-29%
H.264
977
1674
71%
1227
26%
1820
86%
1363
40%
WiFi v1.3
990
1092
10%
880
-11%
1237
25%
814
-18%
Load
232
277
19%
159
-31%
205
-12%

Notebookcheck 总体评分

如果您正在寻找一款可能经久耐用的日常伴侣,并始终希望使用最新的软件,那么 Pixel 9 可能就是您的高品质高端手机。

Google Pixel 9 - 10/23/2024 v8
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis
89%
Keyboard
66 / 75 → 88%
Pointing Device
94%
Connectivity
66 / 69 → 96%
Weight
88%
Battery
91%
Display
92%
Games Performance
30 / 55 → 54%
Application Performance
63 / 85 → 74%
AI Performance
70%
Temperature
88%
Noise
100%
Audio
80 / 90 → 89%
Camera
82%
Average
76%
85%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
60%
Packaging
100%
Power Use
98.7%
Repairability
60%
Software Updates
100%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 69.8%

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 谷歌 Pixel 9 评测--谷歌小型智能手机走错了路
Marcus Herbrich, 2024-10-26 (Update: 2024-10-26)