专为精明消费者打造的功能强大的一体化平板电脑--小米 Poco Pad X1 评测

Name: Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
Brand: Xiaomi

iPad 杀手

通过 Poco Pad X1，小米将目光瞄准了经典的 iPad，不仅提供了更好的功能，而且价格更低，质量却丝毫不打折扣。这是一款适合所有人的完美平板电脑吗？
Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 02/09/2026 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Android Touchscreen Tablet

结论 - Poco Pad X1

小米 Poco Pad X1 是一款高端中档平板电脑，采用纤薄的金属外壳，做工令人印象深刻。突出的摄像头在日常使用中有些恼人，但可以通过使用保护套来避免。显示屏具有出色的图像质量、无闪烁显示和高亮度。

Test device courtesy of Xiaomi

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

骁龙芯片负责提供流畅的性能，即使在玩游戏时也是如此。不过，它缺少耳机插孔、指纹传感器和振动马达。好的一面是，它配备了 Wi-Fi 6E、NFC 和良好的手写笔支持，尽管摄像头效果一般。

Poco Pad X1 运行基于Android 16 的 HyperOS 3.0，软件与时俱进，但广告和预装应用程序略微影响了用户体验。更新保证期为五年，对于这个价位的设备来说还算不错。

Pros

+ 无闪烁 144Hz 显示屏

+ 音效不错

+ 支持笔和键盘

+ 高速 SoC

Cons

- 仅提供 12 个月保修

- 无指纹传感器

- 配件价格昂贵

价格和供应情况

小米 Poco Pad X1 可在英国亚马逊小米商店或阿里速卖通购买。或阿里速卖通。

Ibywind for Xiaomi Pad 7/Pad 7 Pro/Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 Screen Protector,2-Pack,9H Hardness Tempered Glass with Easy Installation Tool,Bubble-Free,Fingerprint Unlock,Anti-Shatter,Anti-Scratch
Keyboard Case Compatible with Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 11.2 inch (2025) Backlit Detachable Bluetooth Wireless Keyboard Case PU Leather Cover Compatible with Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 11.2" Tablet (Black)
Suttkue for Redmi pad pro/Xiaomi Poco Pad/Redmi pad 2 pro 12.1 inch Screen Protector,9H Hardness, Anti-Scratch, Tempered Glass flim, Case Friendly, Anti-Scratch,(2PACK)

结论 - Poco Pad X1
规格Poco Pad X1
外壳 - Poco Pad X1 采用金属一体成型机身
功能 - 具备高级功能的 Poco 平板电脑
软件 - HyperOS 3.0 已经面世
通信 - Pad X1 的快速 Wi-Fi
相机 - 白天使用固体光学器件
配件和保修 - 仅提供 12 个月的保修服务
输入设备和操作 - Poco 平板电脑提供人脸识别功能
显示屏 - Poco Pad X1 采用高对比度、无闪烁 LCD 显示屏
性能 - Poco 平板电脑搭载骁龙 7+ 第三代处理器
排放 - 在负载情况下仅有轻微损失
电池运行时间 - 短得出奇
Notebookcheck 总体评分
可能的替代品比较

Pad X1 是 Poco 平板电脑系列中的旗舰产品，与 Poco Pad M1 同时发布。 Poco Pad M1.虽然它也主打多媒体，但显示屏略小，元件质量更高，可选配件也有区别。

Poco Pad X1 并不正式面向欧洲市场，欧洲市场的代表产品是几乎完全相同的小米 Pad 7.因此，这款平板电脑没有官方的建议零售价，但它已经可以从不同的零售商那里以低于 330 英镑的价格买到。

规格Poco Pad X1

Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 (Poco Pad Series)

Processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, 1 x 2.8 GHz ARM Cortex-X4, 4 x 2.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A720, 3 x 1.9 GHz ARM Cortex-A520, Cortex-X4, A720, A520

Graphics adapter

Qualcomm Adreno 732

Memory

8 GB

, LPDDR5x

Display

11.20 inch 3:2, 3200 x 2136 pixel 344 PPI, Capacitive touchscreen, native pen support, TFT-LCD, up to 360 Hz touch sampling rate, Wet touch technology, glossy: yes, HDR, 144 Hz

Storage

512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash, 512 GB

, 480.3 GB free

Connections

1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: USB-C, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, OTG, IR-Blaster

Networking

Wi-Fi 6E (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.4

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 6.18 x 251.22 x 173.42

Battery

8850 mAh Lithium-Ion, QC3+, QC3.0, QC2.0, PD3.0, PD2.0, MI FC2.0

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 16

Camera

Primary Camera: 13 MPix (OV13B10, 1/3.06", 1.12 µm, f/2.2, 28 mm); Camera2-API-Level: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix (OV08D10, 1/4", 1.12 µm, f/2.28, 18 mm)

Additional features

Keyboard: OnScreen, 45W-Chaerger, USB-Cabel, HyperOS 3.0, 12 Months Warranty, Bluetooth Audio Codecs: SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX TWS+, LHDC 5.0, LDAC | GNSS: not supported | HDR: HLG, HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision | DRM Widevine L1 | USB Copy Test: 346.51 MB/s (connected to Samsung Portable SSD T7 (USB 3.2 Gen. 2), Supported File Systems for external storages: FAT32, exFAT, NTFS | max. charging speed: 45 W (wired), fanless

Released

11/26/2025

Weight

500 g

Price

389 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

外壳 - Poco Pad X1 采用金属一体成型机身

小米 Poco Pad X1 有蓝色和灰色两种颜色，厚度仅为 6.18 毫米，不过我们测量的厚度为 6.45 毫米。摄像头突出 3.2 毫米，这可能会导致平板电脑放在桌子上时晃动。选配的保护套可以解决这个问题。

金属一体成型外壳的制造质量令人印象深刻。它的触感非常出色，扭动时只会发出轻微的吱吱声。缝隙紧密均匀。金属外壳有点容易沾染指纹，但很容易清洁。

小米尚未提供任何有关 IP 等级的信息。

尺寸比较

Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 Xiaomi Pad 7 Apple iPad 11 (2025) DIN A5 ❌

功能 - 具备高级功能的 Poco 平板电脑

Poco Pad X1 配备了快速 USB 3.2 端口，也可用于有线视频输出。它可以镜像平板电脑的屏幕，但缺少桌面模式。

除了小米的连接选项外，X1 还提供 NFC 功能，并可通过 Miracast 作为电脑的附加屏幕。此外，X1 还配备了红外爆破器。不过，它没有配备振动电机和指纹传感器。此外，还缺少耳机插孔和 microSD 卡支持。

软件 - HyperOS 3.0 已经面世

Poco Pad X1 最初搭载的是谷歌Android 15 和小米 HyperOS 2.0，但在我们的评测开始后不久，它就更新到了目前的 HyperOS 3.0，它基于Android 16。小米平板电脑计划三年内接受主要更新，五年内接受安全补丁。小米的 HyperAI 也包括在内。

遗憾的是，这款平板电脑还包含一些广告和几个预装的第三方应用程序。不过，这些都可以轻松卸载。您可以在本文中了解如何删除广告在本文中.

可持续性

小米尚未提供有关 Poco Pad X1 可持续性的任何具体信息。包装不含塑料，但用透明薄膜密封。

由于 Poco Pad X1 没有在德国正式发售，因此小米没有提供任何维修手册或备件。不过，这款平板电脑与相同的 Pad 7i兼容，因此可以使用姊妹机型的资源。

通信 - Pad X1 的快速 Wi-Fi

Poco Pad X1 采用快速 Wi-Fi 6E，因此可以在 6 GHz 频段上运行。因此，与华硕Rapture GT-AXE11000参考路由器的数据传输速度非常快。

不过，小米平板电脑不支持卫星定位。在视频会议方面，小米平板电脑具有降噪功能、"FocusFrame"（类似于Apple 的 Center Stage）和跨设备摄像头。后者允许通过小米的互联技术连接智能手机的摄像头。

Networking
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 Wi-Fi 6E
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	937 (min: 835) MBit/s ∼96%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	944 (min: 831) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1804 (min: 1617) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1589 (min: 1487) MBit/s ∼100%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Wi-Fi 6E
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	905 (min: 435) MBit/s ∼93%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	698 (min: 460) MBit/s ∼74%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1798 (min: 893) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1574 (min: 765) MBit/s ∼99%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Wi-Fi 6E
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	642 (min: 539) MBit/s ∼36%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	746 (min: 680) MBit/s ∼47%
Apple iPad 11 (2025) 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	976 (min: 962) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	867 (min: 554) MBit/s ∼92%
Average Wi-Fi 6E
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	951 (min: 227) MBit/s ∼97%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	934 (min: 442) MBit/s ∼99%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1371 (min: 229) MBit/s ∼76%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1331 (min: 598) MBit/s ∼84%
Average of class Tablet
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	606 (min: 10.5) MBit/s ∼62%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	705 (min: 20.1) MBit/s ∼75%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1240 (min: 330) MBit/s ∼69%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1431 (min: 291) MBit/s ∼90%

Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1804 (1617-1884)

Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1588 (1487-1628)

Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø937 (835-971)

Apple iPad 11 (2025) 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø976 (962-992)

Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø943 (831-988)

Apple iPad 11 (2025) 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø866 (554-892)

相机 - 白天使用固体光学器件

在正面，Poco Pad X1 可为视频通话提供稳定的图像质量，但这些视频最多只能以全高清（30fps）格式录制。此外，它采用了与 Pad M1.

背面的主摄像头采用了更大的 OmniVision 传感器，分辨率略高。用它拍摄的图像看起来既自然又平衡，在日光下也能呈现高水平的细节。这甚至使偶尔拍摄快照成为可能。

Pad X1 最多可录制超高清（30fps）视频，在 1080p 下甚至能达到 60fps。不过，电子防抖很快就会被高帧率所淹没。

Image comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main camera Main camera 5x zoom Low light

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

配件和保修 - 仅提供 12 个月的保修服务

小米 Poco Pad X1 随附一个 45 瓦充电器和一条 USB 数据线（Type-A 到 Type-C）。Poco Focus 笔、保护盖和浮动键盘作为可选配件提供。

这些配件与小米 Pad 7 完全相同，根据供货情况和价格，这是一个相当有吸引力的主张。

小米为其平板电脑提供 12 个月的国际保修，这并不影响经销商保修.小米关怀服务不适用于平板电脑。

输入设备和操作 - Poco 平板电脑提供人脸识别功能

电容式触摸屏在我们的测试中表现可靠，在执行轻扫手势时提供了令人愉悦的流畅体验。它还支持 Poco Focus Pen（或小米 Focus Pen），该笔的延迟时间仅为 3 毫秒，压力灵敏度最高可达 8192 级。您可以通过磁力将笔吸附在平板电脑上，对其进行存储和充电。书写体验不错。

可选的悬浮键盘（或小米 Pad 7 Focus 键盘）可灵活调节平板电脑的视角，并提供安静的按键和自适应背光。小巧的触摸板响应精确可靠。

在光线充足的条件下，通过前置摄像头进行的人脸识别也能可靠地工作，但在黑暗中就会出现问题。遗憾的是，只能保存两张人脸，而且没有指纹传感器和振动电机。

显示屏 - Poco Pad X1 采用高对比度、无闪烁 LCD 显示屏

Poco Pad X1 的 11.2 英寸（28.45 厘米）LCD 显示屏像素密度高，因此图像清晰锐利。得益于出色的黑度，对比度也非常出色。系统可在 30 至 144 Hz 之间动态调整刷新率，并支持所有常见的 HDR 标准。

对于 LCD 而言，该面板的亮度不错，背光也很出色，我们在评测设备上无法检测到任何漏光现象。此外，小米没有使用 PWM 进行亮度控制，我们也没有观察到任何时间抖动。


712 cd/m²	730 cd/m²	711 cd/m²
720 cd/m²	794 cd/m²	704 cd/m²
717 cd/m²	736 cd/m²	715 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3

Maximum: 794 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 726.6 cd/m² Minimum: 1.46 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 89 %
Center on Battery: 794 cd/m²
Contrast: 1689:1 (Black: 0.47 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 2.2 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.76}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 3.7 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
99.2% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.25
CCT: 6962 K

	Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 TFT-LCD, 3200x2136, 11.2"	Xiaomi Pad 7 LCD, 3200x2136, 11.2"	Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE IPS, 2304x1440, 10.9"	Apple iPad 11 (2025) IPS, 2360x1640, 10.9"
Screen		-3%	13%	-21%
Brightness middle (cd/m²)	794	838 6%	663 -16%	526 -34%
Brightness (cd/m²)	727	815 12%	617 -15%	531 -27%
Brightness Distribution (%)	89	96 8%	84 -6%	93 4%
Black Level * (cd/m²)	0.47	0.88 -87%	0.39 17%	0.99 -111%
Contrast (:1)	1689	952 -44%	1700 1%	531 -69%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	2.2	1.8 18%	1.47 33%	1.9 14%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	5.8	3.9 33%	4.14 29%	4 31%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	3.7	2.5 32%	1.4 62%	2.9 22%
Gamma	2.25 ^98%	2.25 ^98%	2.199 ^100%	2.14 ^103%
CCT	6962 ^93%	6912 ^94%	6730 ^97%	6982 ^93%

* ... smaller is better

Display: APL18 Peak Brightness | HDR Peak Brightness

Display / APL18 Peak Brightness
Xiaomi Pad 7 Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	814 cd/m² +3%
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	788 cd/m²
Apple iPad 11 (2025) A16 GPU 4-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe	547 cd/m² -31%

Display / HDR Peak Brightness
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	574 cd/m²
Xiaomi Pad 7 Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	565 cd/m² -2%
Apple iPad 11 (2025) A16 GPU 4-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe	546 cd/m² -5%

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8082 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

当我们选择 "专业色彩配置文件 "和 "暖温预设 "时，色彩还原最为自然。不过，即便如此，白平衡还是有点偏冷，青色在测试中出现了明显的偏差。不过，在日常使用中，这应该不是一个大问题。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
18.09 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 4.733 ms rise
18.09 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 13.36 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 40 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.1 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
35.42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 10.83 ms rise
35.42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 24.59 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 49 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (31.5 ms).

在阴天时，平板电脑仍可轻松阅读，但在侧面观看时，反光很快就会变得令人烦恼。

视角稳定性很好，我们只注意到在广视角下亮度略有下降。

性能 - Poco 平板电脑搭载骁龙 7+ 第三代处理器

在性能方面，Poco Pad X1 定位中高端，采用了骁龙 7+ 第三代处理器8 GB LPDDR5x 内存。在 CPU 性能方面，它稍稍落后于 iPad.不过，在日常使用中，它仍能提供流畅的系统性能。

Geekbench 6.5
Single-Core
Apple iPad 11 (2025) Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 4-Core, 6144	2566 Points +37%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 12288	1893 Points +1%
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 8192	1869 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 (1168 - 1893, n=5)	1735 Points -7%
Average of class Tablet (323 - 4128, n=95, last 2 years)	1584 Points -15%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 12288	1367 Points -27%
Multi-Core
Apple iPad 11 (2025) Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 4-Core, 6144	5939 Points +14%
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 8192	5230 Points
Xiaomi Pad 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 12288	5089 Points -3%
Average of class Tablet (1104 - 16544, n=95, last 2 years)	5036 Points -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 (3865 - 5230, n=5)	4816 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 12288	3921 Points -25%

Antutu v10 - Total Score
Xiaomi Pad 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 12288	1408366 Points
Apple iPad 11 (2025) Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 4-Core, 6144	1388868 Points
Average of class Tablet (235067 - 3475590, n=67, last 2 years)	1306387 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 (1095324 - 1408366, n=3)	1282866 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 12288	894364 Points

Antutu v11 - Score
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 8192	1743279 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 (n=1)	1743279 Points 0%
Average of class Tablet (522205 - 2274547, n=5, last 2 years)	1342976 Points -23%

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 8192	16011 Points
Xiaomi Pad 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 12288	15466 Points -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 (14109 - 16011, n=3)	15195 Points -5%
Average of class Tablet (7084 - 27428, n=72, last 2 years)	13512 Points -16%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 12288	13344 Points -17%

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 8192	8570 Points
Xiaomi Pad 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 12288	8323 Points -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 (6899 - 8570, n=4)	8036 Points -6%
Average of class Tablet (195 - 13159, n=64, last 2 years)	6436 Points -25%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 12288	6058 Points -29%
System
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 8192	11365 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 (9114 - 11365, n=4)	10172 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 12288	10013 Points -12%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 12288	9977 Points -12%
Average of class Tablet (904 - 18343, n=64, last 2 years)	9714 Points -15%
Memory
Xiaomi Pad 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 12288	10045 Points +8%
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 8192	9332 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 (6544 - 10045, n=4)	8776 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 12288	7554 Points -19%
Average of class Tablet (401 - 17963, n=64, last 2 years)	7511 Points -20%
Graphics
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 8192	25400 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 (23684 - 27713, n=4)	25242 Points -1%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 12288	24169 Points -5%
Average of class Tablet (88 - 57192, n=64, last 2 years)	17887 Points -30%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 12288	10293 Points -59%
Web
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 8192	2002 Points
Xiaomi Pad 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 12288	1887 Points -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 (1604 - 2002, n=4)	1841 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 12288	1730 Points -14%
Average of class Tablet (10 - 2370, n=64, last 2 years)	1590 Points -21%

UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Average of class Tablet (3164 - 76852, n=60, last 2 years)	18727 Points +28%
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 8192	14598 Points
Xiaomi Pad 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 12288	13965 Points -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 (10851 - 14598, n=3)	13138 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 12288	10741 Points -26%

Geekbench AI
Single Precision NPU 1.5
Average of class Tablet (166 - 5295, n=33, last 2 years)	645 Points +47%
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 8192	440 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 (413 - 440, n=3)	431 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 12288	268 Points -39%
Half Precision NPU 1.5
Average of class Tablet (154 - 41155, n=33, last 2 years)	2980 Points +574%
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 8192	442 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 (414 - 442, n=3)	433 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 12288	270 Points -39%
Quantized NPU 1.5
Average of class Tablet (88 - 57388, n=33, last 2 years)	4322 Points +327%
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 8192	1012 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 (954 - 1019, n=3)	995 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 12288	634 Points -37%

AI Benchmark - Score V6
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 8192	5079 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 (3671 - 5079, n=2)	4375 Points -14%
Average of class Tablet (70.4 - 17293, n=31, last 2 years)	3836 Points -24%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 12288	3671 Points -28%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 12288	300 Points -94%

图形处理由 Adreno 732负责图形处理，它不支持光线追踪，但名义上比 A16 GPU的 iPad.不过，根据不同的基准测试场景，这一优势会被更高的分辨率所抵消。

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Xiaomi Pad 7 Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3107 Points +7%
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	2893 Points
Apple iPad 11 (2025) A16 GPU 4-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe	2559 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1488 Points -49%

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Xiaomi Pad 7 Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3098 Points +5%
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	2960 Points
Apple iPad 11 (2025) A16 GPU 4-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe	2611 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1519 Points -49%

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Xiaomi Pad 7 Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	11654 Points +2%
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	11377 Points
Apple iPad 11 (2025) A16 GPU 4-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe	10598 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	5184 Points -54%

3DMark / Solar Bay Score
Apple iPad 11 (2025) A16 GPU 4-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe	3698 Points
Xiaomi Pad 7 Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	Points

3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Apple iPad 11 (2025) A16 GPU 4-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe	3654 Points

3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Xiaomi Pad 7 Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	974 Points +4%
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	939 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	677 Points -28%

3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Xiaomi Pad 7 Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	987 Points +6%
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	934 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	696 Points -25%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi Pad 7 Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps 0%
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	89 fps -26%
Apple iPad 11 (2025) A16 GPU 4-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe	60 fps -50%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi Pad 7 Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	501 fps +4%
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	484 fps
Apple iPad 11 (2025) A16 GPU 4-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe	378.9 fps -22%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	153 fps -68%

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi Pad 7 Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	111 fps +11%
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	100 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	71 fps -29%
Apple iPad 11 (2025) A16 GPU 4-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe	60 fps -40%

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi Pad 7 Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	297 fps +12%
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	265 fps
Apple iPad 11 (2025) A16 GPU 4-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe	205.2 fps -23%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	109 fps -59%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi Pad 7 Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	63 fps +13%
Apple iPad 11 (2025) A16 GPU 4-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe	60 fps +7%
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	56 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	54 fps -4%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi Pad 7 Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	198 fps +7%
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	185 fps
Apple iPad 11 (2025) A16 GPU 4-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe	141.6 fps -23%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	81 fps -56%

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Apple iPad 11 (2025) A16 GPU 4-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe	57.6 fps +75%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	36 fps +9%
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	33 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	32 fps -3%

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Xiaomi Pad 7 Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	113 fps +12%
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	101 fps
Apple iPad 11 (2025) A16 GPU 4-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe	90.3 fps -11%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	46 fps -54%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Apple iPad 11 (2025) A16 GPU 4-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe	40.9 fps +41%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	29 fps 0%
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	29 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	25 fps -14%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	52 fps
Xiaomi Pad 7 Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	50 fps -4%
Apple iPad 11 (2025) A16 GPU 4-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe	40.1 fps -23%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	22 fps -58%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Apple iPad 11 (2025) A16 GPU 4-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe	55.9 fps +22%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	47 fps +2%
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	46 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	37 fps -20%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	136 fps
Xiaomi Pad 7 Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	131 fps -4%
Apple iPad 11 (2025) A16 GPU 4-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe	104.1 fps -23%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	53 fps -61%

GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	24 fps
Xiaomi Pad 7 Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	23 fps -4%
Apple iPad 11 (2025) A16 GPU 4-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe	16.7 fps -30%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	9.7 fps -60%

Jetstream 2 | WebXPRT 4 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1

Jetstream 2 - 2.2 Total Score
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 (Chrome 143)	256.364 Points
Apple iPad 11 (2025) (Chrome 135)	253.674 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 (229 - 256, n=2)	243 Points -5%
Xiaomi Pad 7 (Chrome 135)	228.764 Points -11%
Average of class Tablet (61.3 - 579, n=34, last 2 years)	212 Points -17%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE (Chrome 135)	169.88 Points -34%

WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Apple iPad 11 (2025) (Chrome 135)	236 Points +55%
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 (Chrome 143)	152 Points
Xiaomi Pad 7 (Chrome 135)	151 Points -1%
Average of class Tablet (39 - 376, n=69, last 2 years)	146.4 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE (Chrome 135)	138 Points -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 (110 - 152, n=3)	137.7 Points -9%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPad 11 (2025) (Chrome 135)	74543 Points +6%
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 (Chrome 143)	70183 Points
Xiaomi Pad 7 (Chrome 135)	66744 Points -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 (55668 - 70183, n=3)	64198 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE (Chrome 135)	50864 Points -28%
Average of class Tablet (763 - 138481, n=89, last 2 years)	47209 Points -33%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Tablet (243 - 27101, n=78, last 2 years)	2310 ms * -325%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE (Chrome 135)	790.8 ms * -45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 (544 - 1153, n=3)	754 ms * -39%
Xiaomi Pad 7 (Chrome 135)	564.8 ms * -4%
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 (Chrome 143)	543.9 ms *
Apple iPad 11 (2025) (Chrome 135)	411.4 ms * +24%

* ... smaller is better

	Xiaomi Poco Pad X1	Xiaomi Pad 7	Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE	Lenovo Idea Tab Pro	Average 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	Average of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5		21%	-33%	73%	41%	-15%
Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s)	4068.41	3911.82 -4%	1602.8 -61%	3648.3 -10%	3709 ?(1851 - 4512, n=51) -9%	1924 ?(126.9 - 4093, n=82, last 2 years) -53%
Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s)	3751.24	3387.43 -10%	1271.5 -66%	3298.5 -12%	3123 ?(1494 - 4051, n=51) -17%	1462 ?(80.4 - 3773, n=82, last 2 years) -61%
Random Read 4KB (MB/s)	203.66	311.09 53%	225.1 11%	474.4 133%	383 ?(204 - 512, n=51) 88%	258 ?(20.1 - 475, n=82, last 2 years) 27%
Random Write 4KB (MB/s)	237.72	344.51 45%	204.2 -14%	668 181%	479 ?(45.7 - 987, n=51) 101%	299 ?(9.1 - 989, n=82, last 2 years) 26%

排放 - 在负载情况下仅有轻微损失

温度

在各种可能的情况下，表面温度都保持安全。SoC 冷却也很成功，在压力测试中仅导致了相对较小程度的节流，但在对比中仍然产生了最多的帧数。

Max. Load

Idle


34.4 °C	40.2 °C	38.8 °C
30.1 °C	31.6 °C	31.6 °C
30.5 °C	31 °C	31.8 °C

Maximum: 40.2 °C
Average: 33.3 °C


38.1 °C	40.4 °C	34.7 °C
32.4 °C	35.3 °C	30.6 °C
29.8 °C	30.8 °C	29.6 °C

Maximum: 40.4 °C
Average: 33.5 °C

Power Supply (max.) 38.1 °C | Room Temperature 20.6 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.3 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.2 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 33.6 °C / 92 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.4 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.4 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.

3DMark 压力测试

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	98.9 % +15%
Apple iPad 11 (2025) A16 GPU 4-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe	90.8 % +6%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	86.9 % +1%
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	86 %
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	97.7 % +3%
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	95.1 %
Apple iPad 11 (2025) A16 GPU 4-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe	90.7 % -5%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	89.4 % -6%
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	99.1 % +2%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	98.6 % +1%
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	97.4 %

Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.14.3: Ø17.5 (17.4-18.3)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø8.98 (8.89-9.1)

Apple iPad 11 (2025) A16 GPU 4-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 0.0.0.0: Ø14 (13.8-15.2)

Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø61.7 (56.1-65.2)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø31.8 (31.6-32)

Apple iPad 11 (2025) A16 GPU 4-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø52.5 (51.5-56.8)

Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.2: Ø6.87 (6.78-6.96)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø5.01 (4.99-5.03)

发言人

小米 Poco Pad X1 的四个扬声器支持杜比全景声（Dolby Atmos），虽然缺乏深度，但音质相对较好。

此外，还可以通过 USB-C 或蓝牙进行音频输出。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 24% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 20%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 13% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Apple iPad 11 (2025) audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 34% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 20%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 21% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

电池运行时间 - 短得出奇

耗电量

Poco Pad X1 的耗电量竟然略高于几乎完全相同的小米 Pad 7略高，但与市场上的其他平板电脑相比，仍处于可观的水平。

这款平板电脑的充电功率高达 45 瓦，在我们的测试中，充电时间为 88 分钟（50%：37 分钟；80%：66 分钟）。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.07 / 0.16 Watt
Idle	0.7 / 2.45 / 2.58 Watt
Load	7.31 / 9.17 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 8850 mAh	Xiaomi Pad 7 8850 mAh	Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE 8000 mAh	Apple iPad 11 (2025) 7698 mAh	Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3	Average of class Tablet
Power Consumption		14%	-36%	-119%	-30%	-83%
Idle Minimum * (Watt)	0.7	0.74 -6%	2.1 -200%	1.43 -104%	1.1 ?(0.7 - 1.8, n=5) -57%	2.06 ?(0.7 - 5.6, n=76, last 2 years) -194%
Idle Average * (Watt)	2.45	1.72 30%	2.5 -2%	7.16 -192%	3.6 ?(1.1 - 8.55, n=5) -47%	4.13 ?(1.2 - 9.2, n=76, last 2 years) -69%
Idle Maximum * (Watt)	2.58	1.74 33%	2.9 -12%	7.2 -179%	3.72 ?(1.5 - 8.57, n=5) -44%	4.48 ?(1.37 - 9.5, n=76, last 2 years) -74%
Load Average * (Watt)	7.31	7.26 1%	5.8 21%	11.23 -54%	7.09 ?(6.7 - 7.31, n=3) 3%	9.51 ?(2.5 - 34.9, n=68, last 2 years) -30%
Load Maximum * (Watt)	9.17	8.11 12%	7.9 14%	15.03 -64%	9.53 ?(8.11 - 11.3, n=3) -4%	13.8 ?(5.7 - 41.6, n=68, last 2 years) -50%

* ... smaller is better

耗电量：Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø5.29 (0.969-9.16)

Xiaomi Pad 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø4.53 (0.924-8.1)

Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.726 (0.693-0.912)

Xiaomi Pad 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.76 (0.702-1.424)

功耗：GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø8.98 (8.77-9.12)

Xiaomi Pad 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø8.05 (7.98-8.09)

Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.726 (0.693-0.912)

Xiaomi Pad 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.76 (0.702-1.424)

电池寿命

在功耗测试中已经很明显的问题，现在在电池测试中变成了痛苦的现实。 Pad 7.

尽管如此，Poco Pad X1 的电池续航能力还是不错的，比 iPad 的续航时间要长得多。小米可能还会通过更新进一步改善这一情况。

Battery Runtime


WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 142)		13h 54min

Battery runtime - WiFi v1.3
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 8850 mAh	13.9 h
Xiaomi Pad 7 8850 mAh	18.1 h
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE 8000 mAh	14.8 h
Apple iPad 11 (2025) 7698 mAh	10.6 h

Notebookcheck 总体评分

小米 Poco Pad X1 是一款做工精良的中端平板电脑，具有出色的显示屏和快速的性能，但可选配件很快就会变得昂贵。

Back to the verdict

Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 - 02/06/2026 v8
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis

84 / 98 → 86%

Keyboard

70 / 80 → 87%

Pointing Device

93%

Connectivity

58 / 69 → 84%

Weight

83 / 40-88 → 90%

Battery

90%

Display

84%

Games Performance

42 / 65 → 64%

Application Performance

72 / 92 → 78%

AI Performance

30%

Temperature

91%

Noise

100%

Audio

84 / 91 → 92%

Camera

60 / 90 → 66%

Average

65%

86%

Tablet - Weighted Average

CO2 Emissions
No Data

Materials
0%

Packaging
75%

Power Use
97.1%

Repairability
40%

Software Updates
72.3%

Total Sustainability Score: 47.4%

可能的替代品比较

Image	Model / Review	Price	Weight	Drive	Display
1. 85.8%	Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 732 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 512 GB	Amazon: 1. Ibywind for Xiaomi Pad 7/Pad... 2. Keyboard Case Compatible wit... 3. Suttkue for Redmi pad pro/Xi... List Price: 389€	500 g	512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	11.20" 3200x2136 344 PPI TFT-LCD
2. 85.9%	Xiaomi Pad 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 732 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB	Amazon: 1. XIAOMI Pad 7 Ai WiFi Version... 2. XIAOMI Pad 7 Ai WiFi Version... 3. Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Ai WiFi Ver... List Price: 400€	500 g	256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	11.20" 3200x2136 344 PPI LCD
3. 81.6%	Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Samsung Exynos 1580 ⎘ Samsung Xclipse 540 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB	Amazon: List Price: 779€	497 g	256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	10.90" 2304x1440 249 PPI IPS
4. 83.9%	Apple iPad 11 (2025) Apple A16 Bionic ⎘ Apple A16 GPU 4-Core ⎘ 6 GB Memory, 128 GB NVMe	Amazon: 1. Apple iPad 11-inch: A16 chip... 2. Apple iPad 11-inch: A16 chip... 3. Apple iPad 11-inch: A16 chip... List Price: 399€	477 g	128 GB NVMe	10.86" 2360x1640 265 PPI IPS

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was given to the author by the manufacturer free of charge for the purposes of review. There was no third-party influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Please share our article, every link counts!

专为精明消费者打造的功能强大的一体化平板电脑--小米 Poco Pad X1 评测

iPad 杀手

结论 - Poco Pad X1

Pros

Cons

价格和供应情况

Table of Contents

规格Poco Pad X1

外壳 - Poco Pad X1 采用金属一体成型机身

尺寸比较

功能 - 具备高级功能的 Poco 平板电脑

软件 - HyperOS 3.0 已经面世

可持续性

通信 - Pad X1 的快速 Wi-Fi

相机 - 白天使用固体光学器件

配件和保修 - 仅提供 12 个月的保修服务

输入设备和操作 - Poco 平板电脑提供人脸识别功能

显示屏 - Poco Pad X1 采用高对比度、无闪烁 LCD 显示屏

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

性能 - Poco 平板电脑搭载骁龙 7+ 第三代处理器

排放 - 在负载情况下仅有轻微损失

温度

3DMark 压力测试

发言人

Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 audio analysis

Apple iPad 11 (2025) audio analysis

电池运行时间 - 短得出奇

耗电量

耗电量：Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

功耗：GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

电池寿命

Notebookcheck 总体评分

可能的替代品比较

Transparency

More articles related to this device