联想ThinkPad P15v G3 AMD笔记本电脑评测:ThinkPad工作站现在首次配备Ryzen 6000H
如果说配备RTX GPU的ThinkPad P系列工作站有一个共同点,那就是英特尔的处理器。这些强大的企业级笔记本电脑从未配备过AMD CPU--直到现在。联想ThinkPad P15v第三代改变了现状,依靠Ryzen 6000系列的H45芯片。同时,它不是一个顶级型号,名字中的 "v "代表着 "价值"。相应地,它更像是工作站笔记本电脑中的一个预算变体,其价格低于联想ThinkPad P16。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
87.8 % | 04/2023 | Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G3 21EM001AGE R7 PRO 6850H, RTX A2000 Laptop GPU | 2.2 kg | 22.7 mm | 15.60" | 3840x2160 | |
88.2 % | 02/2023 | Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB i7-12850HX, RTX A2000 Laptop GPU | 3 kg | 30.23 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
86.2 % | 06/2022 | Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G2 21A9000XGE i7-11800H, T1200 Laptop GPU | 2.3 kg | 22.7 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
87.4 % | 01/2023 | HP ZBook Power 15 G9 6B8C4EA i7-12700H, RTX A2000 Laptop GPU | 2 kg | 22.8 mm | 15.60" | 3840x2160 | |
88.4 % | 10/2022 | Dell Precision 7670 i7-12850HX, RTX A2000 Laptop GPU | 2.7 kg | 24.7 mm | 16.00" | 3840x2400 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
外壳:质朴的ThinkPad设计,哑光黑色
在2022年的ThinkPads中,联想ThinkPad P15v Gen 3是一个特殊的野兽:它基于2020年首次作为联想ThinkPad T15p或P15v Gen 1出现的旧设计。 正因为如此,它看起来与ThinkPad T15等旧机型比目前的ThinkPad T16更相似。这表现在,除其他外,16:9的格式,特别是屏幕下方的边框明显更宽。P15v第三代也仍然是深黑色,而不是ThinkPad T16的更多烟灰色的 "雷霆黑"。因此,根据你的观点,该设计看起来要么有点老式,要么非常经典。ThinkPad P15v第三代看起来是典型的ThinkPad,与老式ThinkPad机型相似,其设计非常方正,有棱有角,这也与ThinkPad P16形成强烈对比,后者采取了非常不同的设计方法。
ThinkPad P15v第三代的设计与ThinkPad T系列非常相似。主板从下面连接到掌托或键盘框架上,该框架也是用镁合金框架加固的。这确保了键盘区域的高度稳定性,只有SD读卡器上方的塑料有点弹性。做工绝对无懈可击,但手感却落后于其他ThinkPads:不幸的是,外壳外面是ABS塑料制成的。掌托部位有一层天鹅绒般的涂层,底部和显示屏边框有粗糙的痕迹,而显示屏盖是由光滑的塑料制成,没有涂层。所有的表面都对灰尘比较敏感。说到显示屏盖:虽然联想依靠的是一个相当厚的盖子,但这个箱子还是比较容易扭转的。然而,对显示屏背面的压力似乎并不影响显示屏。
带有金属盖的两个大的下拉铰链对盖子有很好的抓地力,可以将其打开到180度,显示屏也可以用一只手打开。
与ThinkPad P16相比,联想ThinkPad P15v第三代AMD的移动性大大增强,重量减少了约0.8公斤,外壳明显更薄。惠普的主要竞争对手惠普ZBook Power 15 G9则更轻、更紧凑。
特点:大量的连接,但没有WWAN
自从ThinkPad P15v在2020年首次亮相以来,联想并没有对连接选项做太多改变。AMD版本的一个特别之处是出现了USB4,而不是Thunderbolt--只有一个这样的连接,这在一定程度上限制了它。作为回报,ThinkPad P15v G3仍有Rj45以太网,我们在更大的ThinkPad P16上错过了这一点。
SD卡阅读器
与HP ZBook Power 15不同,ThinkPad P15v有一个SD读卡器。在我们用AV Pro 128 GB V60参考卡进行的读取测试中,它的速度很高。在写入数据时,速度大约减半,但这仍然足以超过实际上更昂贵的ThinkPad P16。
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Dell Precision 7670 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G2 21A9000XGE | |
Average of class Workstation (54.8 - 200, n=16, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G3 21EM001AGE (AV Pro V60) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB (AV Pro V60) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G2 21A9000XGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G3 21EM001AGE (AV Pro V60) | |
Dell Precision 7670 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Average of class Workstation (78.6 - 226, n=16, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB (AV Pro V60) |
沟通
与目前所有基于AMD的联想ThinkPad一样,P15v Gen 3依赖于高通公司的2x2 WiFi 6E解决方案。到目前为止,这个WiFi模块在我们的测试中表现良好--这使得ThinkPad P15v G3的信号稳定性不佳更让我们感到吃惊。在发送和接收数据时,都出现了反复的、可重复的性能下降现象。在接收数据时,这种现象并不像发送时那么严重,在发送时,高通公司的模块远远没有达到其最大性能。
网络摄像头
ThinkPad P15v G3是最后一款专门出售720p网络摄像头的ThinkPads之一。画面不是特别好,外部解决方案对于视频通话来说会好很多。这里安装的摄像头应该作为最后的手段来使用。
安全问题
在安全问题上,联想并没有偷工减料:有Kensington锁,以及掌托中的专用指纹识别器、智能卡读卡器或机械式摄像头孔。BIOS具有篡改检测和Computrace等功能,还有一个专门的TPM 2.0芯片。
辅料
除了带有专用细长端口的电源适配器外,不包括其他配件。ThinkPad Thunderbolt 4工作站底座是一个特定型号的底座。
维护
通过可拆卸的底板可以接触到设备的内部结构,在松开背面的九颗螺丝和几个夹子后就可以取下底板。ThinkPad P15v G3的升级能力很强,只有处理器和WiFi模块是焊接在一起的。有两个M.2 2280插槽可供固态硬盘使用,两个SO-DIMM插槽可供64GB内存使用,电池和冷却系统也可以进行维修。另一方面,不支持WWAN,也没有相应的插槽可用。
ThinkPad P15v第三代的一个特殊功能是容易更换的键盘,松开两个螺丝后可以非常迅速地拆下。由于键盘是一个消耗性部件,这是一个非常值得称赞的设计。
担保
如果你购买的是目前配置的ThinkPad P15v第三代,联想将提供为期三年的制造商自愿保修,在全球范围内有效。服务包括标准的车厂服务,因此笔记本电脑必须送去维修。
输入设备:经典的ThinkPad打字感觉,有1.8毫米的行程
键盘
实际上,近年来所有的ThinkPad笔记本电脑都已经从1.8毫米行程的键盘换成了1.5毫米行程的键盘。 联想ThinkPad P15v第三代是一个例外,正是因为它仍然采用了2020年的设计,所以在键盘质量方面,目前没有其他ThinkPad能跟上P15v G3。额外的集线器,加上更大的按键高度,确保了豪华的、非常愉快的打字体验。黑色的按键具有光滑的手感,并具有白色和蓝色的双级背光灯。
与大多数工作站笔记本电脑一样,ThinkPad P15v第三代有一个全尺寸的键盘,数字键盘在键盘的右边。因此,键盘被移到了左边--不是很理想,但对于依赖数字键盘的用户来说,肯定是可以接受的折中方案。其他所有人都必须使用其他型号,如ThinkPad X1 Extreme G5。
触摸板
联想ThinkPad P15v G3拥有ThinkPad惯用的触摸板和TrackPoint组合。触摸板大小适中,表面由塑料制成,但它不像较新的ThinkPad那样光滑--与机箱的其他部分一样,触摸板对灰尘也非常敏感。触摸板很好地完成了它的工作,没有超越。玻璃触摸板肯定更好,但这里没有什么真正需要抱怨的。点击机制的减震效果也很好。
作为第二个选择,有已经提到的来自Synaptics的TrackPoint。TrackPoint非常有帮助,特别是在打字的时候,可以快速而准确地移动鼠标指针。在狭窄的条件下,例如在飞机上,我们发现它仍然优于触摸板。触摸板上方的专用按钮属于TrackPoint,工作起来完美无缺。 奇怪的是,鼠标右键的声音比左键要大。
显示:哑光4K-UHD面板,100% AdobeRGB
作为2022年的最后一款ThinkPad,联想ThinkPad P15v第三代仍然使用16:9的屏幕。共有三种不同的、对角线为15.6英寸的雾面IPS液晶屏可供选择:
- 全高清(1,920 x 1,080),300 cd/m²,45% NTSC
- 全高清(1,920 x 1,080),300 cd/m²,72% NTSC
- 4K UHD(3840 x 2160),600尼特,100% AdobeRGB
这里安装的京东方面板没有达到600 cd/m²的标准;它的最高值为590 cd/m²,平均值为536 cd/m²。虽然这不是很好,但该屏幕仍然比惠普ZBook Power 15 G9的4K UHD屏幕明显更亮。亮度有83%的提升空间,但幸运的是,我们用肉眼没有发现任何明显的阴影。
|
Brightness Distribution: 83 %
Center on Battery: 588 cd/m²
Contrast: 1547:1 (Black: 0.38 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 1
ΔE Greyscale 7.1 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
99.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
89.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.12
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G3 21EM001AGE NE156QUM-N6C, IPS LED, 3840x2160, 15.60 | Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB NE160QDM-N63 , IPS LED, 2560x1600, 16.00 | Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G2 21A9000XGE N156HCA-EAC, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 15.60 | HP ZBook Power 15 G9 6B8C4EA LGD073F, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.60 | Dell Precision 7670 Samsung 160YV03, OLED, 3840x2400, 16.00 | Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500 LP160UQ1-SPB1, IPS, 3840x2400, 16.00 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -16% | -47% | -18% | 3% | -4% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 89.9 | 71.5 -20% | 43.7 -51% | 69.1 -23% | 99.9 11% | 82.9 -8% |
sRGB Coverage | 100 | 100 0% | 65.1 -35% | 97.7 -2% | 100 0% | 98.9 -1% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 99.9 | 73.3 -27% | 45.3 -55% | 69.6 -30% | 97.5 -2% | 95.9 -4% |
Response Times | 12% | -3% | -2% | 95% | -17% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 46.7 ? | 37.7 ? 19% | 48 ? -3% | 45.8 ? 2% | 1.9 ? 96% | 45.6 ? 2% |
Response Time Black / White * | 27.3 ? | 26.3 ? 4% | 28 ? -3% | 28.6 ? -5% | 2 ? 93% | 36.8 ? -35% |
PWM Frequency | 59.5 ? | |||||
Screen | 16% | -68% | 14% | 6% | 14% | |
Brightness middle | 588 | 424 -28% | 305 -48% | 392 -33% | 340.1 -42% | 601.9 2% |
Brightness | 536 | 398 -26% | 281 -48% | 388 -28% | 342 -36% | 569 6% |
Brightness Distribution | 83 | 90 8% | 88 6% | 88 6% | 98 18% | 77 -7% |
Black Level * | 0.38 | 0.24 37% | 0.32 16% | 0.15 61% | 0.47 -24% | |
Contrast | 1547 | 1767 14% | 953 -38% | 2613 69% | 1281 -17% | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.9 | 2.6 33% | 5.9 -51% | 3.2 18% | 2.5 36% | 2.45 37% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.8 | 4.9 44% | 20.1 -128% | 7 20% | 8.19 7% | 4.46 49% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1 | 0.8 20% | 4.5 -350% | 1.2 -20% | ||
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 7.1 | 4.1 42% | 5.3 25% | 4.9 31% | 3.5 51% | 2.6 63% |
Gamma | 2.12 104% | 2.13 103% | 2.1 105% | 2.13 103% | 2.12 104% | 2.3 96% |
CCT | 7268 89% | 7252 90% | 6307 103% | 5982 109% | 6704 97% | 6805 96% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 4% /
9% | -39% /
-55% | -2% /
5% | 35% /
21% | -2% /
5% |
* ... smaller is better
开箱后,用CalMAN测量的灰度的偏差特别大,这一点从灰度的高deltaE值就可以看出。在用X-Rite i1Pro 2色度计和X-Rite i1Profiler校准后,整体deltaE值的平均值为1,这是一个非常好的结果。
虽然联想没有完全实现承诺的亮度,但色彩空间覆盖率的规格是正确的:我们测量了99.99%的AdobeRGB宽幅色彩空间的覆盖率。 这使得该面板成为图像编辑的一个非常好的选择。
哑光的显示表面和高于500cd/m²的亮度值,联想ThinkPads P15v Gen 3 AMD非常适合户外使用,这并不奇怪。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
27.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14.3 ms rise | |
↘ 13 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 66 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
46.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 21.5 ms rise | |
↘ 25.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 78 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17924 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
性能:非常好的CPU性能遇到有限的GPU
联想在ThinkPad P15v第三代AMD中共提供了两个处理器:你可以选择Ryzen 7 Pro 6850H或Ryzen 5 Pro 6650H。 图形芯片方面还有一个选择,所有三个都来自Nvidia:T600、RTX A1000和RTX A2000。没有没有专用GPU的变种。
最大的内存扩展是64GB DDR5-4800,有两个SO-DIMM插槽可用。还有两个M.2 2280插槽,联想提供高达4TB的存储空间(两个2TB)。
测试条件
总共有两种性能模式,可以通过Windows设置选择。在 "更高的电池效率 "模式下,处理器的功率被限制在15瓦。如果选择 "更好的性能 "或 "最佳性能",CPU可以短暂地消耗65瓦,长期的功率限制为54瓦。
ThinkPad P15v G3交付时装有Windows 10 Pro 64位。与较大的ThinkPad P16一样,我们遇到的问题是Cinebench R15作为后台任务运行,因此没有使用全部性能。因此,我们改用较新的Cinebench R23进行耐力测试。
处理器
AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 6850H是 "Rembrandt "一代的八核处理器。最大时钟频率为4.7 GHz,基本时钟为3.2 GHz。作为一个H型处理器,典型的TDP为45瓦。我们的CPU列表可用于与其他CPU进行进一步的基准比较。
考虑到更大的联想ThinkPad P16和戴尔Precision 7670使用名义上更强大的英特尔HX55 CPU,ThinkPad P15v G3 AMD在CPU基准测试中表现相当好,它甚至在连续负载中与戴尔笔记本电脑并列。然而,总体结果被单核性能拖累;英特尔的竞争对手在这里明显领先。只有ThinkPad P16在所有CPU测试中明显更快。
在电池模式下,处理器的性能有所下降。 在Cinebench R23多核测试中,ThinkPad P15v G3没有达到4946分,而是达到2990分。这相当于降低了40%的功率。
Cinebench R23 Multi endurance test
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB | |
Average of class Workstation | |
Dell Precision 7670 | |
HP ZBook Power 15 G9 6B8C4EA | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G3 21EM001AGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G2 21A9000XGE -1! |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB | |
Average of class Workstation (4332 - 24560, n=27, last 2 years) | |
Dell Precision 7670 | |
HP ZBook Power 15 G9 6B8C4EA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G3 21EM001AGE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H (12016 - 12770, n=2) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G2 21A9000XGE |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB | |
HP ZBook Power 15 G9 6B8C4EA | |
Average of class Workstation (1144 - 2106, n=27, last 2 years) | |
Dell Precision 7670 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H (1469 - 1491, n=2) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G3 21EM001AGE |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB | |
Dell Precision 7670 | |
Average of class Workstation (1669 - 9329, n=28, last 2 years) | |
HP ZBook Power 15 G9 6B8C4EA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G3 21EM001AGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G3 21EM001AGE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H (2990 - 4946, n=3) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G2 21A9000XGE |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB | |
Dell Precision 7670 | |
HP ZBook Power 15 G9 6B8C4EA | |
Average of class Workstation (528 - 816, n=28, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G3 21EM001AGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G3 21EM001AGE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H (564 - 583, n=3) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G2 21A9000XGE |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB | |
Dell Precision 7670 | |
Average of class Workstation (706 - 3625, n=27, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G3 21EM001AGE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H (2081 - 2090, n=2) | |
HP ZBook Power 15 G9 6B8C4EA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G2 21A9000XGE |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB | |
Average of class Workstation (166.2 - 301, n=27, last 2 years) | |
Dell Precision 7670 | |
HP ZBook Power 15 G9 6B8C4EA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G2 21A9000XGE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H (166.2 - 244, n=2) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G3 21EM001AGE |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G2 21A9000XGE | |
Average of class Workstation (137 - 684, n=27, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G3 21EM001AGE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H (235 - 248, n=2) | |
HP ZBook Power 15 G9 6B8C4EA | |
Dell Precision 7670 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB | |
Average of class Workstation (20087 - 99351, n=27, last 2 years) | |
HP ZBook Power 15 G9 6B8C4EA | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H (52391 - 56498, n=2) | |
Dell Precision 7670 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G3 21EM001AGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G2 21A9000XGE |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Average of class Workstation (4777 - 6670, n=27, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB | |
HP ZBook Power 15 G9 6B8C4EA | |
Dell Precision 7670 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G3 21EM001AGE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H (5374 - 5460, n=2) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G2 21A9000XGE |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB | |
Average of class Workstation (5022 - 17487, n=27, last 2 years) | |
HP ZBook Power 15 G9 6B8C4EA | |
Dell Precision 7670 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H (8093 - 8851, n=2) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G3 21EM001AGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G2 21A9000XGE |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Average of class Workstation (1474 - 2095, n=27, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB | |
Dell Precision 7670 | |
HP ZBook Power 15 G9 6B8C4EA | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H (1474 - 1481, n=2) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G2 21A9000XGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G3 21EM001AGE |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Dell Precision 7670 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB | |
Average of class Workstation (5.09 - 26, n=27, last 2 years) | |
HP ZBook Power 15 G9 6B8C4EA | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H (12.7 - 15.9, n=2) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G3 21EM001AGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G2 21A9000XGE |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G3 21EM001AGE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H (50.7 - 95.2, n=2) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G2 21A9000XGE | |
Dell Precision 7670 | |
Average of class Workstation (36.5 - 95.2, n=27, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB | |
HP ZBook Power 15 G9 6B8C4EA |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G2 21A9000XGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G3 21EM001AGE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H (0.516 - 0.524, n=2) | |
HP ZBook Power 15 G9 6B8C4EA | |
Dell Precision 7670 | |
Average of class Workstation (0.3876 - 0.544, n=27, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G3 21EM001AGE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H | |
Average of class Workstation | |
HP ZBook Power 15 G9 6B8C4EA | |
Dell Precision 7670 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G2 21A9000XGE |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB | |
Average of class Workstation (2619 - 25776, n=27, last 2 years) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H (15009 - 15301, n=2) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G3 21EM001AGE | |
HP ZBook Power 15 G9 6B8C4EA | |
Dell Precision 7670 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G2 21A9000XGE |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H (93021 - 94997, n=2) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G3 21EM001AGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB | |
Average of class Workstation (12909 - 109059, n=27, last 2 years) | |
Dell Precision 7670 | |
HP ZBook Power 15 G9 6B8C4EA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G2 21A9000XGE |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB | |
Average of class Workstation (824 - 4981, n=27, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G2 21A9000XGE | |
HP ZBook Power 15 G9 6B8C4EA | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H (3155 - 3169, n=2) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G3 21EM001AGE | |
Dell Precision 7670 |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H (100724 - 102905, n=2) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G3 21EM001AGE | |
HP ZBook Power 15 G9 6B8C4EA | |
Average of class Workstation (26716 - 131931, n=27, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G2 21A9000XGE | |
Dell Precision 7670 |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H (12309 - 12638, n=2) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G3 21EM001AGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB | |
Average of class Workstation (3105 - 14742, n=27, last 2 years) | |
Dell Precision 7670 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G2 21A9000XGE | |
HP ZBook Power 15 G9 6B8C4EA |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H (51299 - 51802, n=2) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G3 21EM001AGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB | |
Average of class Workstation (6967 - 58181, n=27, last 2 years) | |
Dell Precision 7670 | |
HP ZBook Power 15 G9 6B8C4EA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G2 21A9000XGE |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G3 21EM001AGE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H (60476 - 128243, n=2) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G2 21A9000XGE | |
Average of class Workstation (19489 - 132156, n=27, last 2 years) | |
Dell Precision 7670 | |
HP ZBook Power 15 G9 6B8C4EA |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB | |
Average of class Workstation (314 - 1472, n=27, last 2 years) | |
HP ZBook Power 15 G9 6B8C4EA | |
Dell Precision 7670 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G3 21EM001AGE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H (806 - 809, n=2) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G2 21A9000XGE |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB | |
Average of class Workstation (1473 - 13800, n=27, last 2 years) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H (7876 - 8104, n=2) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G3 21EM001AGE | |
Dell Precision 7670 | |
HP ZBook Power 15 G9 6B8C4EA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G2 21A9000XGE |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
HP ZBook Power 15 G9 6B8C4EA | |
Dell Precision 7670 | |
Average of class Workstation (18157 - 48483, n=27, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H (18157 - 26176, n=2) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G3 21EM001AGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G2 21A9000XGE |
系统性能
系统性能基准测试描绘了一幅混合画面。ThinkPad P15v第三代AMD在PCMark 10中取得了非常好的成绩,但在CrossMark中却比竞争对手慢。特别是内存比英特尔的型号要慢。然而,在日常使用中,P15v的运行速度非常快。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Average of class Workstation (5488 - 8587, n=26, last 2 years) | |
Dell Precision 7670 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G3 21EM001AGE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H, NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU () | |
HP ZBook Power 15 G9 6B8C4EA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G2 21A9000XGE |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Dell Precision 7670 | |
Average of class Workstation (9151 - 12197, n=26, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G3 21EM001AGE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H, NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU () | |
HP ZBook Power 15 G9 6B8C4EA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G2 21A9000XGE |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB | |
Average of class Workstation (7846 - 10820, n=26, last 2 years) | |
Dell Precision 7670 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G3 21EM001AGE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H, NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU () | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G2 21A9000XGE | |
HP ZBook Power 15 G9 6B8C4EA |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Average of class Workstation (5399 - 13947, n=26, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G3 21EM001AGE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H, NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU () | |
HP ZBook Power 15 G9 6B8C4EA | |
Dell Precision 7670 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G2 21A9000XGE |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Average of class Workstation (1154 - 1972, n=26, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB | |
HP ZBook Power 15 G9 6B8C4EA | |
Dell Precision 7670 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G2 21A9000XGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G3 21EM001AGE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H, NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU () |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Average of class Workstation (1188 - 1842, n=26, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB | |
HP ZBook Power 15 G9 6B8C4EA | |
Dell Precision 7670 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G3 21EM001AGE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H, NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU () | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G2 21A9000XGE |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB | |
HP ZBook Power 15 G9 6B8C4EA | |
Average of class Workstation (1180 - 2248, n=26, last 2 years) | |
Dell Precision 7670 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G2 21A9000XGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G3 21EM001AGE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H, NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU () |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Average of class Workstation (990 - 1865, n=26, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB | |
HP ZBook Power 15 G9 6B8C4EA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G3 21EM001AGE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H, NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU () | |
Dell Precision 7670 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G2 21A9000XGE |
PCMark 10 Score | 6457 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
HP ZBook Power 15 G9 6B8C4EA | |
Dell Precision 7670 | |
Average of class Workstation (30324 - 74486, n=27, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H (30324 - 48504, n=2) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G3 21EM001AGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G2 21A9000XGE |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Dell Precision 7670 | |
HP ZBook Power 15 G9 6B8C4EA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB | |
Average of class Workstation (30787 - 73331, n=27, last 2 years) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H (33791 - 42736, n=2) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G3 21EM001AGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G2 21A9000XGE |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
HP ZBook Power 15 G9 6B8C4EA | |
Dell Precision 7670 | |
Average of class Workstation (32728 - 92336, n=27, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H (32728 - 51157, n=2) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G3 21EM001AGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G2 21A9000XGE |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H (93.5 - 132.1, n=2) | |
Average of class Workstation (83.4 - 138.9, n=27, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G2 21A9000XGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G3 21EM001AGE | |
HP ZBook Power 15 G9 6B8C4EA | |
Dell Precision 7670 |
* ... smaller is better
DPC延时
DPC延迟比竞争对手低,但这款联想笔记本电脑在视频播放方面仍有问题。我们在YouTube的测试中观察到总共32个丢帧。然而,这种行为可能会随着驱动程序的更新而随时改变。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G2 21A9000XGE | |
Dell Precision 7670 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB | |
HP ZBook Power 15 G9 6B8C4EA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G3 21EM001AGE |
* ... smaller is better
大容量存储
联想为ThinkPad P15v G3 AMD配备了最多两个M.2 2280固态硬盘。我们的测试单元不得不使用一块固态硬盘,这是一块来自SK海力士的快速1TB NVMe PCIe 4.0固态硬盘。它的性能相当高,而且在连续负载下也很好。
* ... smaller is better
Continuous read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
GPU
Nvidia RTX A2000是Nvidia为专业应用提供的入门级GPU,经过ISV认证的驱动程序对CAD进行了特别优化。2560个着色器单元的工作频率最高为1.69GHz,TGP最高为95瓦,而主内存为4至8G。 通过我们的GPU比较列表可以进行基准比较。
联想规定GPU的TGP为35瓦,是RTX A2000的绝对最低值。这也是具有4GB内存的较弱变体。我们测试设备的最大消耗是40瓦,这仍然是相当低的。 ThinkPad P16 G1(60瓦)和戴尔Precision 7670(95瓦)都允许相同的图形芯片消耗明显更多。在这方面,P15v Gen 3的GPU基准测试结果相当低并不令人惊讶--同时,它仍然是采用AMD处理器的最强大的ThinkPad工作站。
在电池模式下,这台联想工作站在3DMark 11图形测试中仍然取得了11792分。这相当于GPU性能降低了约20%。
SPECviewperf Performance Rating - Percent | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500 | |
Average of class Workstation | |
Dell Precision 7670 -1! | |
HP ZBook Power 15 G9 6B8C4EA -8! | |
Average NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G3 21EM001AGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G2 21A9000XGE -8! |
3DMark 11 Performance | 14564 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 36070 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 10333 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 4566 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
游戏性能大致符合我们从合成基准中的预期:性能比配备Nvidia T1200的ThinkPad P15v Gen 2好,但比所有其他竞争对手差。它对全高清游戏来说是足够的,但在更高的分辨率下,帧率迅速下降。
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500 | |
Average of class Workstation (19.6 - 156.5, n=28, last 2 years) | |
Dell Precision 7670 | |
HP ZBook Power 15 G9 6B8C4EA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G3 21EM001AGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G2 21A9000XGE |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500 | |
Dell Precision 7670 | |
Average of class Workstation (18.3 - 124.4, n=26, last 2 years) | |
HP ZBook Power 15 G9 6B8C4EA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G3 21EM001AGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G2 21A9000XGE |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500 | |
Average of class Workstation (21.2 - 149.1, n=28, last 2 years) | |
Dell Precision 7670 | |
HP ZBook Power 15 G9 6B8C4EA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G3 21EM001AGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G2 21A9000XGE |
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500 | |
Dell Precision 7670 | |
Average of class Workstation (57.8 - 166.7, n=28, last 2 years) | |
HP ZBook Power 15 G9 6B8C4EA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G2 21A9000XGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G3 21EM001AGE |
Witcher 3 FPS diagram
low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | 4K | |
GTA V (2015) | 167.3 | 157.6 | 117.2 | 61.1 | 44.1 | 41.2 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 218 | 145.6 | 82.2 | 43.9 | 29.2 | |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 122.3 | 111.1 | 105.3 | 100.4 | 64.2 | |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 112.5 | 62.5 | 46 | 33.4 | 17.7 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 88.2 | 77 | 63.2 | 51.3 | ||
Strange Brigade (2018) | 238 | 113.8 | 89.9 | 77.9 | 57.1 | 33 |
F1 22 (2022) | 130.3 | 125.8 | 89.5 | 27.6 | 16.7 | 7.1 |
排放:ThinkPad P15v运行时比竞争对手更安静
噪声排放
对于工作站来说,联想ThinkPad P15v G3的冷却系统很弱,只有一个风扇。尽管笔记本的性能很好,但风扇通常保持沉默或相对安静。风扇的最大噪音保持在40dB(a)以下--一些对比设备的噪音明显更大。
我们在联想ThinkPad上没有发现任何线圈的啸叫。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 23.2 / 23.2 / 23.2 dB(A) |
Load |
| 35 / 37.5 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23.2 dB(A) |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G3 21EM001AGE RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, R7 PRO 6850H, SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X081N | Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, i7-12850HX, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH | Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G2 21A9000XGE T1200 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Toshiba XG6 KXG6AZNV512G | HP ZBook Power 15 G9 6B8C4EA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | Dell Precision 7670 RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, i7-12850HX, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -11% | -9% | -11% | -14% | |
off / environment * | 23.2 | 23.2 -0% | 25.21 -9% | 23.8 -3% | 22.7 2% |
Idle Minimum * | 23.2 | 23.2 -0% | 25.21 -9% | 23.8 -3% | 22.9 1% |
Idle Average * | 23.2 | 23.2 -0% | 25.21 -9% | 23.8 -3% | 22.9 1% |
Idle Maximum * | 23.2 | 23.2 -0% | 25.21 -9% | 23.8 -3% | 24.5 -6% |
Load Average * | 35 | 47.8 -37% | 39.09 -12% | 42.9 -23% | 48.7 -39% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 37.9 | 34.1 10% | 36.6 3% | 44.5 -17% | 45.2 -19% |
Load Maximum * | 37.5 | 56.3 -50% | 43.53 -16% | 47.9 -28% | 52.1 -39% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
联想笔记本电脑在键盘上方和底部的中间位置变得特别热,在Witcher 3 ,ThinkPad的温度略高。我们记录的最高温度是底部的53摄氏度,掌托在任何情况下都保持相对凉爽。
经过大约一个小时的连续压力测试,CPU的功率限制为45瓦,图形芯片的消耗量为35瓦。没有出现节流现象。
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48.7 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 38.1 °C / 101 F, ranging from 22.2 to 69.8 °C for the class Workstation.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 50.5 °C / 123 F, compared to the average of 41.3 °C / 106 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.3 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 32 °C / 90 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 38.8 °C / 102 F, compared to the device average of 32 °C / 90 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (35.1 °C / 95.2 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.8 °C / 82 F (-7.3 °C / -13.2 F).
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G3 21EM001AGE AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H, NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU | Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB Intel Core i7-12850HX, NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU | Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G2 21A9000XGE Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA T1200 Laptop GPU | HP ZBook Power 15 G9 6B8C4EA Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU | Dell Precision 7670 Intel Core i7-12850HX, NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 5% | -8% | 8% | -13% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 48.7 | 43.1 11% | 53.8 -10% | 40.3 17% | 51 -5% |
Maximum Bottom * | 50.5 | 39.9 21% | 52.1 -3% | 48.3 4% | 45.8 9% |
Idle Upper Side * | 25 | 26 -4% | 27.6 -10% | 23.7 5% | 31.8 -27% |
Idle Bottom * | 25.4 | 27.6 -9% | 27.7 -9% | 23.8 6% | 32.6 -28% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
ThinkPad P15v G3 AMD的扬声器还需要改进。最重要的是,它们相对安静,而且基本上缺乏低音。惠普ZBook Power 15的扬声器没有明显改善,但至少声音大了一点。
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G3 21EM001AGE audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (70.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 72% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 18%, worst was 35%
Compared to all devices tested
» 55% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
HP ZBook Power 15 G9 6B8C4EA audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 78% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 18%, worst was 35%
Compared to all devices tested
» 63% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理:尽管电池很小,但电池寿命并不差
消耗功率
联想ThinkPad P15v第三代AMD的运行效率并不高,考虑到低效的组件,尤其是4K UHD显示屏,这并不令人惊讶。相比之下,惠普ZBook Power 15的低消耗相当令人惊讶,而ThinkPad P16(带4K LCD)和戴尔Precision 7670的整体闲置消耗甚至更高。
ThinkPad P15v G3在峰值负载时的最大功率为124瓦,并不是一个节能奇迹。不过,消耗量保持在135瓦的紧凑型电源适配器的范围内。
Off / Standby | 0.47 / 0.83 Watt |
Idle | 6.3 / 13.9 / 14.5 Watt |
Load |
82.8 / 124.8 Watt |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G3 21EM001AGE R7 PRO 6850H, RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X081N, IPS LED, 3840x2160, 15.60 | Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB i7-12850HX, RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH, IPS LED, 2560x1600, 16.00 | Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G2 21A9000XGE i7-11800H, T1200 Laptop GPU, Toshiba XG6 KXG6AZNV512G, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 15.60 | HP ZBook Power 15 G9 6B8C4EA i7-12700H, RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.60 | Dell Precision 7670 i7-12850HX, RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N, OLED, 3840x2400, 16.00 | Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500 i9-12950HX, RTX A5500 Laptop GPU, WDC PC SN810 2TB, IPS, 3840x2400, 16.00 | Average NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU | Average of class Workstation | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 0% | 9% | 19% | -47% | -95% | -16% | -18% | |
Idle Minimum * | 6.3 | 5.1 19% | 5.96 5% | 3.9 38% | 7.5 -19% | 7.5 -19% | 6.6 ? -5% | 7.82 ? -24% |
Idle Average * | 13.9 | 9.2 34% | 8.37 40% | 7.2 48% | 9.5 32% | 20.1 -45% | 11.8 ? 15% | 12.7 ? 9% |
Idle Maximum * | 14.5 | 9.9 32% | 9.05 38% | 8.5 41% | 28.4 -96% | 40 -176% | 16.7 ? -15% | 18.7 ? -29% |
Load Average * | 82.8 | 124.1 -50% | 91.82 -11% | 87.2 -5% | 139.1 -68% | 137 -65% | 116.3 ? -40% | 96.5 ? -17% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 88.8 | 87.7 1% | 102 -15% | 86.8 2% | 134 -51% | 208 -134% | ||
Load Maximum * | 124.8 | 168.9 -35% | 126.38 -1% | 139 -11% | 220.8 -77% | 285.9 -129% | 171.3 ? -37% | 158.9 ? -27% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Witcher 3 / Stress test
Power consumption with an external monitor
电池寿命
内部锂聚合物电池的容量只有68瓦时,而我们比较的所有设备的电池容量都更大。 尽管如此,联想ThinkPad P15v G3 AMD实现了可观的电池寿命--如果有更大的电池或节能的全高清显示屏,它甚至可以成为工作站中的电池寿命冠军。
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G3 21EM001AGE R7 PRO 6850H, RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, 68 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB i7-12850HX, RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, 94 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G2 21A9000XGE i7-11800H, T1200 Laptop GPU, 68 Wh | HP ZBook Power 15 G9 6B8C4EA i7-12700H, RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, 83 Wh | Dell Precision 7670 i7-12850HX, RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, 83 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500 i9-12950HX, RTX A5500 Laptop GPU, 94 Wh | Average of class Workstation | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 16% | -22% | 44% | -24% | -16% | 5% | |
H.264 | 641 | 482 -25% | 717 ? 12% | ||||
WiFi v1.3 | 416 | 564 36% | 452 9% | 599 44% | 355 -15% | 350 -16% | 536 ? 29% |
Load | 110 | 106 -4% | 54 -51% | 75 -32% | 81.3 ? -26% |
Pros
Cons
结论:ThinkPad P15v第三代AMD是一个罕见的组合,有优势也有劣势
联想ThinkPad P15v第三代代表了进入更强大的ThinkPad工作站系列的入门级别。正因为如此,有几个地方联想走了一些弯路。我们测试的模型有一个小电池,WWAN在AMD版本中不可用,显示屏仍然是过时的16:9格式,联想采用了一个弱的720p网络摄像头和太安静的扬声器。这些都是合理的批评意见;此外,WiFi性能也时好时坏。
同时,这款联想笔记本电脑也有一些很好的优点,甚至比更贵的ThinkPad P16还有些优势。例如,P15v Gen 3有更好的键盘,而且运行起来更安静,即使在负载下也是如此,这要归功于高效的AMD处理器,尽管电池容量有限,但这也有助于将电池寿命提升到可接受的水平。P15v第3代有一个快速的SD读卡器以及RJ45以太网,一个明亮的哑光4K UHD显示屏,覆盖了AdobeRGB色彩空间,而且由于采用了AMD-H CPU,还提供了非常好的处理器性能。同时,该机型的可升级性或可维护性也相当高。GPU相当弱,但公平地说,惠普在这个价格范围内的直接竞争对手在这方面也没有真正做得更好。
ThinkPad P15v G3 AMD:具有长行程的键盘加上AMD Ryzen 6000是一个成功的组合--但有一些明显的弱点。
在联想的产品线中,联想ThinkPad P15v第三代AMD是一个非常有趣的机型--是最后一个采用旧设计的机型之一,但同时现在又配备了非常高效和现代的AMD处理器。令人遗憾的是,联想没有在该机型中加入WWAN功能,也没有提供更大的电池,至少没有作为一个升级选项。这些错误使P15v失去了这个类别中的绝对头把交椅,但它仍然是一台非常有用的、好的工作笔记本电脑。
P15v的主要竞争对手惠普的ZBook Power 15也有类似情况,它有更高质量的金属外壳和更大的电池,但只提供英特尔CPU,而且没有SD读卡器。
价格和可用性
联想ThinkPad P15v第三代AMD的测试配置为 2,293美元,由亚马逊提供。.它也可以在联想的网站上找到,起价为1,496.95美元。.
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G3 21EM001AGE
-
04/24/2023 v7
Benjamin Herzig
Transparency
The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.