Notebookcheck Logo

联想 ThinkPad E570 (酷睿 i5, GTX 950M) 笔记本电脑简短评测

实惠型ThinkPad新机。 在尺寸稍小的E470给我们不错的印象之后,我们现在又拿到了联想的15.6寸Kaby Lake ThinkPad E570。我们的深入评测将会考察这台大尺寸的E系列机型表现如何。
Business Kaby Lake Laptop / Notebook Skylake Windows
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 (ThinkPad E570 Series)
Processor
Intel Core i5-7200U 2 x 2.5 - 3.1 GHz, Kaby Lake
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M - 2048 MB VRAM, Core: 927 MHz, Memory: 1252 MHz, GDDR5, 369.59, Nvidia Optimus mit Intel HD 620
Memory
8 GB 
, DDR4-2133, 两个内存槽一个已占用
Display
15.60 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, AUO B156HAN04.4, IPS LED, glossy: no
Mainboard
Intel Kaby Lake-U Premium PCH
Storage
Toshiba THNSF5256GPUK, 256 GB 
, 2280 M.2 PCIe NVMe 固态硬盘
Soundcard
Conexant CX11852
Connections
1 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 VGA, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 3.5毫米耳机接口, Card Reader: 四合一SD读卡器
Networking
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit/s), Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2
Optical drive
DVD +/- RW Double Layer
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 25.4 x 379 x 261
Battery
41 Wh Lithium-Ion, removeable
Camera
Webcam: 720p
Additional features
Speakers: JBL 2瓦 立体声扬声器, Keyboard: 6行孤岛式键盘搭配数字键盘区, Keyboard Light: no, 12 Months Warranty
Weight
2.3 kg, Power Supply: 451 g
Price
699 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Opened
Opened
Display lid with velvety finish
From the side
Half-opened display from the right
Screen with relatively wide display bezel
Underside
Numpad
F10-F12 with new second assignment
HD webcam

Size Comparison

382 mm 259 mm 29.2 mm 2.4 kg382 mm 263 mm 24 mm 2 kg379 mm 261 mm 25.4 mm 2.3 kg377 mm 255 mm 27 mm 2.4 kg380 mm 260 mm 23.25 mm 2.1 kg379 mm 260 mm 22.9 mm 2.2 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
Left: power-in, VGA, HDMI, 2x USB 3.0
Left: power-in, VGA, HDMI, 2x USB 3.0
Right: 3.5-mm audio, 1x USB 2.0, Ethernet, DVD drive, Kensington lock
Right: 3.5-mm audio, 1x USB 2.0, Ethernet, DVD drive, Kensington lock
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
 
107.8 MB/s +72%
HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA
 
72.7 MB/s +16%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000
 
62.5 MB/s
Dell Latitude 15-3570
 
22.24 MB/s -64%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
 
250.6 MB/s +207%
HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA
 
89 MB/s +9%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000
 
81.7 MB/s
Dell Latitude 15-3570
 
24.15 MB/s -70%
Networking
iperf3 receive AX12
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000
Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174
495 MBit/s
Acer Spin 5 SP513-51
Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter
347 MBit/s -30%
HP 15-ba077ng
Realtek RTL8723BE Wireless LAN 802.11n PCI-E NIC
43 MBit/s -91%
iperf3 transmit AX12
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000
Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174
434 MBit/s
Acer Spin 5 SP513-51
Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter
349 MBit/s -20%
HP 15-ba077ng
Realtek RTL8723BE Wireless LAN 802.11n PCI-E NIC
54 MBit/s -88%
Keyboard area ThinkPad E570
Keyboard area ThinkPad E570
289
cd/m²
265
cd/m²
265
cd/m²
233
cd/m²
242
cd/m²
226
cd/m²
230
cd/m²
223
cd/m²
216
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
AUO B156HAN04.4 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 289 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 243.2 cd/m² Minimum: 2 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 75 %
Center on Battery: 245 cd/m²
Contrast: 1008:1 (Black: 0.24 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.65 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 3.39 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
57.66% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
36.69% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
39.94% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
58% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
38.65% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.7
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000
AUO B156HAN04.4, , 1920x1080, 15.60
Lenovo ThinkPad E560 20EV000XPB
LG Display LEN40BA / LP156WF6-SPK1, , 1920x1080, 15.60
HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA
Chi Mei CMN15C4, , 1920x1080, 15.60
Dell Latitude 15-3570
LG Philips LGD04AF / 156WHU, , 1366x768, 15.60
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
Chi Mei CMN15C4, , 1920x1080, 15.60
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE
BOE HF NV156FHM-N42, , 1920x1080, 15.60
Display
-7%
3%
5%
-0%
10%
Display P3 Coverage
38.65
36.05
-7%
39.89
3%
40.61
5%
38.57
0%
42.66
10%
sRGB Coverage
58
53.2
-8%
59.5
3%
61.1
5%
57.4
-1%
64.1
11%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
39.94
37.4
-6%
41.24
3%
41.96
5%
39.89
0%
44.08
10%
Response Times
-16%
-14%
10%
-31%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
44.8 ?(16.4, 28.4)
51 ?(23, 28)
-14%
37 ?(13, 24)
17%
39 ?(21, 18)
13%
51 ?(18, 33)
-14%
Response Time Black / White *
25.6 ?(6.8, 18.8)
30 ?(10, 20)
-17%
37 ?(20, 17)
-45%
24 ?(19, 5)
6%
38 ?(8, 30)
-48%
PWM Frequency
50 ?(40)
50 ?(10)
Screen
-3%
-60%
-80%
-50%
9%
Brightness middle
242
332.2
37%
214
-12%
202
-17%
176
-27%
291
20%
Brightness
243
301
24%
201
-17%
211
-13%
169
-30%
265
9%
Brightness Distribution
75
80
7%
77
3%
88
17%
91
21%
86
15%
Black Level *
0.24
0.4
-67%
0.43
-79%
0.62
-158%
0.47
-96%
0.23
4%
Contrast
1008
831
-18%
498
-51%
326
-68%
374
-63%
1265
25%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
4.65
10.68
-130%
12.35
-166%
8.83
-90%
4.78
-3%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
9.64
18.07
-87%
19.9
-106%
14.01
-45%
9.51
1%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
3.39
11.32
-234%
13.46
-297%
8.97
-165%
3.49
-3%
Gamma
2.7 81%
2.26 97%
2.44 90%
2.43 91%
2.58 85%
CCT
6246 104%
12204 53%
15217 43%
10234 64%
6013 108%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
36.69
38
4%
39
6%
36.8
0%
40
9%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
57.66
59
2%
61
6%
57.3
-1%
64
11%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-5% / -5%
-24% / -42%
-30% / -54%
-13% / -32%
-4% / 4%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
25.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6.8 ms rise
↘ 18.8 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 56 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
44.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 16.4 ms rise
↘ 28.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 73 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18110 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE
Intel Core i7-7500U
148 Points +15%
HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA
Intel Core i7-7500U
146 Points +13%
Lenovo ThinkPad E560 20EV000XPB
Intel Core i7-6500U
132 Points +2%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
Intel Core i5-7200U
129 Points 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000
Intel Core i5-7200U
129 Points
Dell Latitude 15-3570
Intel Core i5-6200U
116 Points -10%
CPU Multi 64Bit
HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA
Intel Core i7-7500U
355 Points +8%
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE
Intel Core i7-7500U
338 Points +2%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
Intel Core i5-7200U
331 Points 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000
Intel Core i5-7200U
330 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad E560 20EV000XPB
Intel Core i7-6500U
305 Points -8%
Dell Latitude 15-3570
Intel Core i5-6200U
290 Points -12%
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
72.2 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
330 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
129 Points
Help
PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE
GeForce 940MX, i7-7500U, Liteonit CV3-DE256
3778 Points +6%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000
GeForce GTX 950M, i5-7200U, Toshiba THNSF5256GPUK
3550 Points
Dell Latitude 15-3570
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP
3337 Points -6%
HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA
GeForce 930MX, i7-7500U, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002
3163 Points -11%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
GeForce GTX 950M, i5-7200U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
3162 Points -11%
Work Score Accelerated v2
HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA
GeForce 930MX, i7-7500U, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002
4725 Points +1%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000
GeForce GTX 950M, i5-7200U, Toshiba THNSF5256GPUK
4666 Points
Dell Latitude 15-3570
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP
4477 Points -4%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
GeForce GTX 950M, i5-7200U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
4047 Points -13%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3550 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4666 points
Help
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000
Toshiba THNSF5256GPUK
Lenovo ThinkPad E560 20EV000XPB
Samsung CM871 MZ7LF192HCGS
HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA
SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002
Dell Latitude 15-3570
Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE
Liteonit CV3-DE256
AS SSD
-70%
-46%
-75%
-33%
Seq Read
1227
489.5
-60%
493.8
-60%
489.1
-60%
479.8
-61%
Seq Write
636
169.9
-73%
315.9
-50%
130
-80%
377.8
-41%
4K Read
37.12
17.46
-53%
17.96
-52%
17.25
-54%
32.4
-13%
4K Write
73.1
34.76
-52%
73.4
0%
21.57
-70%
59.7
-18%
4K-64 Read
654
84.6
-87%
137.1
-79%
81.8
-87%
345.5
-47%
4K-64 Write
232.5
33.68
-86%
195.5
-16%
19.37
-92%
203.7
-12%
Score Total
1578
305
-81%
607
-62%
267
-83%
951
-40%
Toshiba THNSF5256GPUK
Sequential Read: 1140 MB/s
Sequential Write: 468.1 MB/s
512K Read: 759 MB/s
512K Write: 414 MB/s
4K Read: 34.3 MB/s
4K Write: 123.4 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 530 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 319.2 MB/s
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i5-7200U
4251 Points 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i5-7200U
4243 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad E560 20EV000XPB
AMD Radeon R7 M370, Intel Core i7-6500U
2524 Points -41%
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i7-7500U
2436 Points -43%
HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA
NVIDIA GeForce 930MX, Intel Core i7-7500U
2092 Points -51%
Dell Latitude 15-3570
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U
1273 Points -70%
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i5-7200U
22439 Points +3%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i5-7200U
21835 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad E560 20EV000XPB
AMD Radeon R7 M370, Intel Core i7-6500U
10364 Points -53%
HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA
NVIDIA GeForce 930MX, Intel Core i7-7500U
9122 Points -58%
Dell Latitude 15-3570
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U
5909 Points -73%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i5-7200U
3574 Points +1%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i5-7200U
3545 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad E560 20EV000XPB
AMD Radeon R7 M370, Intel Core i7-6500U
1693 Points -52%
HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA
NVIDIA GeForce 930MX, Intel Core i7-7500U
1637 Points -54%
3DMark 11 Performance
4255 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
10297 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
3244 points
Help
low med. high ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 138.1 95.4 86.8 35.66
Company of Heroes 2 (2013) 47.25 40.03 27.41 16.89
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 71.4 40.32 21.2

Noise Level

Idle
29 / 29 / 29 dB(A)
Load
34.3 / 40.1 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 29 dB(A)
Max. Load
 38.5 °C41.7 °C25.1 °C 
 41.5 °C46.6 °C24.8 °C 
 26.8 °C35.3 °C21.1 °C 
Maximum: 46.6 °C
Average: 33.5 °C
23.5 °C39.7 °C34 °C
24.5 °C49.1 °C41.1 °C
22 °C33 °C32.1 °C
Maximum: 49.1 °C
Average: 33.2 °C
Power Supply (max.)  40.9 °C | Room Temperature 19.8 °C | Fluke 62 Max
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.5 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 31.2 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.6 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49.1 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 39.1 °C / 102 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.1 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 31.2 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (35.3 °C / 95.5 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-6.5 °C / -11.7 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2030.331.12530.331.7313133.24029.2305029.131.36328.429.58034.133.510038.236.812531.333.616025.539.720026.354.825025.266.931526.670.840024.368.250022.764.363019.461.180019.656.5100018.657.5125018.764.5160018.570.9200018.276250018.371315018.566.9400020.965500020.364.8630019.563.6800019.764.21000019.756.81250020.554.21600019.652.3SPL32.480.7N1.945.7median 19.7median 64.2Delta3.36.935.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.72.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseLenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.8% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (16.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 59% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 43% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 49% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.4 / 0.48 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 2.8 / 6.3 / 6.9 Watt
Load midlight 51.6 / 69.7 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000
i5-7200U, GeForce GTX 950M, Toshiba THNSF5256GPUK, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 15.60
Lenovo ThinkPad E560 20EV000XPB
6500U, Radeon R7 M370, Samsung CM871 MZ7LF192HCGS, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA
i7-7500U, GeForce 930MX, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002, TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.60
Dell Latitude 15-3570
6200U, HD Graphics 520, Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP, TN LED, 1366x768, 15.60
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
i5-7200U, GeForce GTX 950M, Toshiba MQ01ABD100, TN, 1920x1080, 15.60
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE
i7-7500U, GeForce 940MX, Liteonit CV3-DE256, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Power Consumption
-29%
-9%
3%
-41%
-8%
Idle Minimum *
2.8
3.6
-29%
3.8
-36%
4.9
-75%
6
-114%
3.9
-39%
Idle Average *
6.3
8.7
-38%
6.6
-5%
7.2
-14%
8.1
-29%
7.4
-17%
Idle Maximum *
6.9
11.5
-67%
11.3
-64%
7.5
-9%
9.8
-42%
9.5
-38%
Load Average *
51.6
61.9
-20%
38
26%
25.4
51%
52.5
-2%
41
21%
Load Maximum *
69.7
64.8
7%
45
35%
28
60%
81.6
-17%
48
31%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
14h 43min
WiFi Websurfing (Edge)
7h 42min
Load (maximum brightness)
2h 9min
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000
i5-7200U, GeForce GTX 950M, 41 Wh
Lenovo ThinkPad E560 20EV000XPB
6500U, Radeon R7 M370, 48 Wh
HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA
i7-7500U, GeForce 930MX, 45 Wh
Dell Latitude 15-3570
6200U, HD Graphics 520, 65 Wh
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
i5-7200U, GeForce GTX 950M, 62 Wh
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE
i7-7500U, GeForce 940MX, 30 Wh
Battery Runtime
-11%
-3%
18%
-19%
-40%
Reader / Idle
883
789
-11%
746
-16%
1024
16%
767
-13%
WiFi v1.3
462
513
11%
542
17%
451
-2%
275
-40%
Load
129
123
-5%
157
22%
75
-42%
WiFi
331
H.264
460

Pros

+ 易用的输入设备
+ 可以令人满意的屏幕
+ 几乎无噪音
+ 高于平均水平的扬声器
+ 作为商务本显卡性能强劲

Cons

- 屏幕上盖:稳定性和工艺品质较差
- 不支持USB-C
- 接口布局不够理想
- 在负载下有降频问题
In review: Lenovo Thinkpad E570. Review sample courtesy of Campuspoint.de
In review: Lenovo Thinkpad E570. Review sample courtesy of Campuspoint.de

E570作为第一台上市的15.6寸Kaby Lake ThinkPad设备,具备不少优秀特性:它的优秀输入设备更是其中的亮点。联想在屏幕的选择上没有重大失误;它的色域覆盖对于低售价设备来说并不算无法接受,而其他方面都表现不错。E570也十分易于维护,搭配了优秀的扬声器,和相对较强的显卡,为它带来了十分不错的多媒体性能。另外,我们发现这台设备在低负载下可以保持清凉和完全安静。

遗憾的是,联想的设计也有一些不足之处,它的接口布局不是特别合理,尽管搭配了DVD光驱,如果安排得当的话它的接口布局还可以得到不小的改善。在负载下它的处理器和显卡也有降频现象,这意味着散热系统能力不足。最后我们还需要提到它的机身,它的屏幕上盖不论在工艺还是坚固度上都难以令人满意。

十分遗憾联想在工艺品质上留下了这样的缺陷。E570实际上对于学生来说是一台十分有吸引力的设备——不过,尺寸稍小的E470可能更胜一筹。

不论如何,我们认为E570由于整体性价比优秀十分值得推荐。它对于需要一台搭配输入设备的机型的学生或者个人用户来说十分适合。不过对于除学生以外的消费者来说它的性价比并不算出色:固定配置机型售价750欧元(约5489人民币),但没有搭配固态硬盘仅提供了1TB的机械硬盘,同时没有搭载独立显卡。当从联想直接购买时,它至少搭配了较弱的940MX惠普 ProBook 450 G4的售价相比稍低,不过采用了较差的TN屏幕。

注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里。 

Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 - 02/03/2017 v6(old)
Benjamin Herzig

Chassis
73 / 98 → 74%
Keyboard
87%
Pointing Device
84%
Connectivity
49 / 81 → 60%
Weight
61 / 20-67 → 87%
Battery
90%
Display
84%
Games Performance
76 / 85 → 89%
Application Performance
88 / 92 → 95%
Temperature
90%
Noise
94 / 95 → 99%
Audio
69%
Camera
40 / 85 → 46%
Average
76%
84%
Multimedia - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 联想 ThinkPad E570 (酷睿 i5, GTX 950M) 笔记本电脑简短评测
Benjamin Herzig, 2017-02-11 (Update: 2017-02-11)