索尼Xperia 10 IV智能手机评论。具有出色电池寿命的迷你智能手机

Name: Sony Xperia 10 IV
Brand: Sony

任何智能手机都可以做大。 索尼正在重新推出其6英寸的智能手机，并向紧凑型移动设备的粉丝提供一个有趣的提议。Xperia 10 IV的得分是一个非常纤细和防水的外壳，有一个锐利的AMOLED显示屏，在电池寿命方面明显优于许多XXL智能手机。然而，也有一些弱点。

Manuel Masiero, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 09/15/2022 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

5G Android Smartphone Touchscreen

Apple第一部iPhone于2007年推出，配备3.5英寸显示屏。以今天的标准来看，它简直是小巫见大巫，很难找到任何买家，因为买家现在早已习惯了更大的显示屏。目前，智能手机的标准外形尺寸已经远远超过6英寸，而且还在不断增加。

然而，许多用户对小尺寸的智能手机充满信心。它们轻巧、紧凑，可以用一只手很好地操作，而且在性能上仍然可以与 "大的 "竞争。

索尼的Xperia 10 IV正好属于这个类别。它拥有6英寸AMOLED屏幕和中档的骁龙695 5G的性能，它提供了坚实的规格。特别值得关注的是其超长的电池运行时间，这通常是小型智能手机的致命弱点。我们的评论揭示了Xperia 10 IV在与其他小型智能手机的竞争中表现如何。

Test device courtesy of cyberport.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Sony Xperia 10 IV (Xperia 10 Series)

Processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G 8 x 1.7 - 2.2 GHz, Kryo 660 Gold (2x Cortex-A78) / Silver (6x Cortex-A55)

Graphics adapter

Qualcomm Adreno 619

Memory

6 GB

Display

6.00 inch 21:9, 2520 x 1080 pixel 457 PPI, capacitive, OLED, FHD+, 120 Hz Touch sampling rate, Gorilla Glass Victus, glossy: yes, HDR, 60 Hz

Storage

128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 128 GB

, 105 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: 3.5mm headset jack, Card Reader: microSD up to 1 TB (exFAT supported), 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Proximity, Compass, Google Cast, DRM Widevine L1, Camera2 API Level 3

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.1, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (Band 1, 4, 5, 8), 4G (Band 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41), 5G (Band n1, n3, n7, n8, n28, n38, n41, n77, n78, n79), Head SAR 0.99 W/kg, Body SAR 1.22 W/kg, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 8.3 x 153 x 67

Battery

5000 mAh Lithium-Polymer

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 12

Camera

Primary Camera: 12 MPix (f/1.8, 27mm, 1/2.8" Exmor R, FOV 79°) + 8MP (2x optical zoom, f/2.2, 54mm, 1/4.4", FOV 43°) + 8MP (f/2.2, 16mm, 1/4.0", FOV 120°), videos up to 1080p@60 FPS (EIS & OIS)
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix (f/2.0, 1/4.0", FOV 78°), videos up to 1080p@30fps (EIS)

Additional features

Speakers: single, Keyboard: virtual, Quick Start Guide, Warranty information, Xperia UI, 24 Months Warranty, fanless, waterproof

Weight

161 g

Price

499 Euro

Links

Sony homepage
Sony notebook section

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Drive	Size	Resolution
82.9 %	09/2022	Sony Xperia 10 IV SD 695 5G, Adreno 619	161 g	128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	6.00"	2520x1080
86.1 %	04/2022	Apple iPhone SE 2022 A15, A15 GPU 5-Core	144 g	64 GB SSD	4.70"	1334x750
85.9 %	05/2021	Asus ZenFone 8 SD 888 5G, Adreno 660	169 g	256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	5.92"	2400x1080
89.3 %	05/2022	Samsung Galaxy S22 Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920	167 g	128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.10"	2340x1080
83.4 %	06/2021	Sony Xperia 10 III SD 690 5G, Adreno 619L	169 g	128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	6.00"	2520x1080
87.7 %	03/2022	Xiaomi 12 SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730	179 g	256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.28"	2400x1080

外壳 - 由于其21:9的格式，非常纤薄

在中档智能手机的设计方面，索尼没有随波逐流。这款6英寸的手机使用了相对较厚的屏幕边缘，而且与同价位的一些对手不同，没有采用曲面显示屏。背部没有玻璃，而是有一个哑光塑料涂层，也覆盖了边框。它看起来像一个保护罩，感觉很优质，由于它的轻质橡胶涂层，确保了良好的抓地力。这款智能手机有薰衣草色、薄荷色、黑色和白色。

Xperia 10 IV的一个引人注目的设计特点是其不寻常的21:9屏幕格式，这不仅使手机看起来特别苗条--就像 Apple iPhone SE (2022)几乎不宽--但它的手感也非常好。由于其小的外形和161克的低重量，索尼总体上感觉是一款明显较小的智能手机。

由于顶部和底部的边框略宽，Xperia 10 IV不需要为自拍相机开显示屏，所以你可以使用整个屏幕区域。自拍相机被放置在上层显示框的左侧，即使是第二眼也很难察觉。

尽管采用了AMOLED面板，但索尼并没有将指纹传感器放在显示屏下方，该显示屏受到大猩猩玻璃Victus的保护，而是放在电源按钮上。SIM/MicroSD插槽无需工具即可打开。

Xperia 10 IV通过了IP65和IP68认证，因此既防尘又防水。

尺寸比较

设备 - 通知LED和支持eSIM

索尼的Xperia 10 IV只有一种配置。6GB内存和128GB UFS存储，在索尼的商店里约为450欧元（约合450美元）。内部存储可以通过microSD卡扩展。卡槽中还可容纳2张nano-SIM卡，也支持eSIMs。

这款索尼智能手机没有红外发射器，也没有无线电接收。另一方面，包括一个3.5毫米插孔，支持OTG的USB-C 2.0，蓝牙5.1和NFC。还提供了一个通知LED。

微型SD卡读卡器

这款microSD读卡器最多支持1TB的存储介质，也可以用exFAT文件系统进行格式化。该读卡器在使用我们的Angelbird AV Pro V60 microSD参考卡时实现了良好的连续读写率，但在复制测试中的表现低于平均水平。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Sony Xperia 10 III Adreno 619L, SD 690 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	33.73 MB/s +57%
Sony Xperia 10 IV Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	21.49 MB/s

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

Sony Xperia 10 IV Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø34.4 (25.8-42.5)

Sony Xperia 10 III Adreno 619L, SD 690 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Toshiba Exceria Pro M501: Ø37.1 (31.1-48.6)

Sony Xperia 10 IV Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø74.1 (41.6-84)

Sony Xperia 10 III Adreno 619L, SD 690 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Toshiba Exceria Pro M501: Ø85.7 (39.6-101)

软件 -Android 12与Xperia UI

索尼的Xperia 10 IV运行Android 12，制造商在其上叠加了自己的Xperia UI用户界面。与库存的Android 相比，只有少数变化，因此新人和换机的人可以很快找到自己的方式。少数预装的第三方应用程序都可以卸载，除了LinkedIn，它只能被停用。

索尼计划为Xperia 10 IV提供两年的Android 升级和三年的安全更新，这个时间框架是从市场推出时（2022年6月中旬）开始。在9月初审查时，Android 安全补丁是6月1日，因此已不太符合最新情况。

通信和GNSS - 快速WiFi 5和单频GNSS

Xperia 10 IV支持所有当前的移动标准，包括5G。频率覆盖面不广，但很扎实，包括欧盟地区的所有重要频段。

在本地网络中，索尼智能手机只通过WiFi 5进行通信，因为既不支持WiFi 6也不支持WiFi 6E。尽管如此，Xperia 10 IV在连接到我们的华硕ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000参考路由器时，实现了高于平均水平的WiFi 5传输率，峰值为715 MBit/s，从而明显超过了前代产品的WiFi数据吞吐量。此外，数据传输在发送和接收方向都非常稳定。

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	854 (763^min - 898^max) MBit/s +24%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	763 (386^min - 780^max) MBit/s +11%
Apple iPhone SE 2022 A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD	746 (599^min - 768^max) MBit/s +8%
Sony Xperia 10 IV Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	690 (674^min - 705^max) MBit/s
Average of class Smartphone (34.8 - 1875, n=210, last 2 years)	654 MBit/s -5%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Apple iPhone SE 2022 A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD	888 (869^min - 906^max) MBit/s +24%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	823 (418^min - 852^max) MBit/s +15%
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	757 (380^min - 826^max) MBit/s +6%
Sony Xperia 10 IV Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	715 (357^min - 729^max) MBit/s
Average of class Smartphone (40.5 - 1810, n=211, last 2 years)	690 MBit/s -3%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Average of class Smartphone (229 - 1894, n=61, last 2 years)	1536 MBit/s
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1407 (872^min - 1714^max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1751 (879^min - 1776^max) MBit/s
Average of class Smartphone (598 - 1840, n=61, last 2 years)	1364 MBit/s
iperf3 transmit AX12
Asus ZenFone 8 Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1261 (1192^min - 1327^max) MBit/s
Sony Xperia 10 III Adreno 619L, SD 690 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	504 (479^min - 524^max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Asus ZenFone 8 Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	903 (446^min - 918^max) MBit/s
Sony Xperia 10 III Adreno 619L, SD 690 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	554 (513^min - 573^max) MBit/s
Average of class Smartphone (last 2 years)	376 MBit/s

Sony Xperia 10 IV Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 619; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø689 (674-705)

Sony Xperia 10 III Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 619L; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø543 (513-573)

Sony Xperia 10 IV Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 619; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø703 (357-729)

Sony Xperia 10 III Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 619L; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø504 (479-524)

索尼智能手机的定位是通过一些GNSS系统进行的，即GPS（L1）、Glonass（L1）、Galileo（E1）、Beidou（B1）和QZSS（L1）。在测试中，它在室内和室外的管理速度相当快，精确度高达3米。

然而，事实证明，Xperia 10 IV在卫星定位方面不太准确。在与Garmin Venu2健身追踪器进行的10公里自行车骑行的直接比较中，智能手机的GNSS定位经常偏离实际路线，并在建筑更密集的城市地区走了一两个弯路。因此，你应该做好准备，在日常使用中，用Xperia 10 IV进行精确导航并不总是可能的。

电话和语音质量

除了microSD卡外，Xperia 10 IV的SIM卡槽中还可容纳两张nano-SIM卡。支持VoLTE和Wi-Fi通话。如果使用两张SIM卡，只有其中一张能够接入5G。另外，也可以配置一个eSIM。索尼的具体吸收率为0.99W/kg（头部SAR）和1.22W/kg（身体SAR），不属于低辐射智能手机的范畴。

在通话过程中，Xperia 10 IV提供了良好的语音质量，并相当可靠地屏蔽了背景噪音。在免提模式下，打电话的人听起来有点闷，但除此之外，通过线路两端的扩音器，没有任何通信问题。

照相机 - 带有光学图像稳定功能的迟钝的三联相机

Xperia 10 IV使用的是三摄像头，与前代产品几乎没有变化。它包括一个12MP广角摄像头（f/1.8，1/2.8"，FOV 79°），一个8MP超广角摄像头（f/2.2，1/4.0"，FOV 120°）和一个8MP双光学变焦长焦摄像头（f/2.2，1/4.4 FOV 43°）。前面是一个800万像素的摄像头，可以进行良好的自拍。

与前代产品相比，光学图像稳定器也确保了视频的无模糊记录。视频的特点是图像质量好，但仍然只有最大分辨率为1080p的60FPS。

照片应用程序不是最快的。如果你在视频录制过程中快速来回移动智能手机，会出现滞后效应，即显示屏明显滞后于目标对象。照相机应用程序在拍照时也反应相当迟钝，特别是在低光照条件下。在这里，它可能需要两秒钟才能拍到照片。

在白天，这款智能手机可以拍出色彩逼真的照片，而且由于其超广角相机和长焦相机的组合，在选择拍摄对象方面也有很大的灵活性。然而，在细节和图像清晰度方面，照片只能算是一般，在夜间简直是糟糕。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Daylight shot 1 Daylight shot 2 Ultra wide angle 5x zoom Low light shot

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

在测试实验室中，主相机相当准确地再现了色彩，在理想的照明条件下，最大Delta-E为9.51。测试图也被清晰地再现。然而，在1勒克斯的余光下，颜色的准确性就过了，只有测试图的轮廓可以被识别。

ColorChecker Sony Xperia 10 IV: 6.27 ∆E min: 2.34 - max: 9.51 ∆E

附件和保修 - 30瓦的电源适配器需要额外收费

许多智能手机制造商都选择在交货范围内放弃电源适配器。Xperia 10 IV更进一步，包装中也省去了USB线，因此交付范围仅限于快速指南和保修信息。

索尼在其网络商店提供两个专门为Xperia 10 IV量身定做的配件：一个30瓦的快速充电器(XQZ-UC1，约50美元)和一个带集成支架的形式的盖子(XQZ-CBCC，约35美元)。

索尼Xperia 10 IV在德国有24个月的保修期。这在其他国家可能有所不同，所以在购买前一定要向你的供应商查询。

输入设备和操作 - 愉快的触觉和可扩展的显示

Xperia 10 IV的触摸屏以120赫兹的采样率工作，实现输入没有任何明显的延迟。触摸屏骁龙695 5G使得操作基本流畅。只要多任务处理不是重点，八核SoC就能为日常任务提供足够的性能。

由于2560x1080的高显示分辨率，图标、菜单和字体显得相当小。如果有必要，屏幕元素的显示尺寸可以在Android 设置中进行5级调整。预设为2级，留有足够的空间进行放大。由于显示器过长，单手操作并不总是容易，但这可以通过可切换的单手模式来克服。

物理按键牢牢地固定在外壳上，有一个清晰的压力点，并提供令人愉快的反馈。电源键深深地嵌在机箱里，因此不用看就能轻易地感觉到。如果你把手指放在电源按钮上，集成的指纹传感器会快速可靠地解锁智能手机，并且在显示屏关闭时也能发挥作用。

Xperia 10 IV不提供面部识别。

显示屏 - 60赫兹的清晰显示

Xperia 10 IV的显示屏与前代产品没有区别。一方面，这很好，因为AMOLED面板由于其457PPI的高像素密度，显示内容非常清晰。然而，60赫兹的帧率已不再与时俱进了。这个价格范围内的大多数其他设备现在提供90甚至120赫兹。

在亮度方面，AMOLED显示屏也几乎与Xperia 10 III在禁用亮度传感器的情况下，我们测得的平均亮度为580.1cd/m²。启用传感器后，最高可达573 cd/m²。如果亮度测量被限制在一个较小的图像区域（APL18），亮度会增加到756 cd/m²。在最低的亮度水平，AMOLED面板仍然以2.86 cd/m²的亮度闪耀。

显示屏在所有亮度水平下都会闪烁，频率范围为60至253赫兹。由于相当平坦和均匀的振幅曲线，PWM闪烁不应该是一个问题，即使对于敏感的用户来说。


584 cd/m²	590 cd/m²	593 cd/m²
579 cd/m²	572 cd/m²	581 cd/m²
575 cd/m²	567 cd/m²	580 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3

Maximum: 593 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 580.1 cd/m² Minimum: 2.86 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 96 %
Center on Battery: 572 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 1.4 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
95.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.29

	Sony Xperia 10 IV OLED, 2520x1080, 6.00	Apple iPhone SE 2022 IPS, 1334x750, 4.70	Asus ZenFone 8 AMOLED, 2400x1080, 5.92	Samsung Galaxy S22 AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.10	Sony Xperia 10 III OLED, 2520x1080, 6.00	Xiaomi 12 OLED, 2400x1080, 6.28
Screen		-59%	-47%	-36%	-14%	-47%
Brightness middle	572	662 16%	758 33%	853 49%	536 -6%	867 52%
Brightness	580	647 12%	759 31%	858 48%	540 -7%	867 49%
Brightness Distribution	96	92 -4%	98 2%	96 0%	97 1%	98 2%
Black Level *		0.4
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	0.9	1.44 -60%	3.5 -289%	1.9 -111%	1.1 -22%	1.7 -89%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	1.2	4.74 -295%		3.2 -167%	1.9 -58%	4.4 -267%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	1.4	1.7 -21%	1.6 -14%	1.9 -36%	1.3 7%	1.8 -29%
Gamma	2.29 ^96%	2.179 ^101%	2.23 ^99%	2.07 ^106%	2.27 ^97%	2.2 ^100%
CCT	6614 ^98%	6746 ^96%	6527 ^100%	6460 ^101%	6494 ^100%	6762 ^96%
Contrast		1655

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

253 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 253 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 253 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

在固定的变焦水平和不同的亮度设置下进行的一系列测量

Xperia 10 IV的显示颜色可以通过两种图像模式（"原始模式 "和 "标准模式"）来调整。你还可以通过 "暖"、"中 "和 "冷 "三个配置文件调整白平衡，或通过调整RGB通道手动调整。

如果你喜欢最自然的色彩表现，那么 "原始模式 "是最佳选择。同时，我们建议手动调整白平衡并使用截图中显示的RGB设置。这样，Xperia 10 IV在色彩和灰度再现方面就属于理想范围。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
2.85 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 1.483 ms rise
2.85 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 1.365 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 9 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
2.93 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 1.456 ms rise
2.93 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 1.475 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 8 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

索尼的智能手机在户外的表现相对较好。AMOLED屏幕的亮度还不足以在阳光直射下清晰地显示所有内容。然而，在阴暗处也没有问题。由于高视角的稳定性，从各种角度都能看到显示屏。

性能 - 性能稳定，但几乎不比前代产品快

该骁龙695 5G骁龙695 5G在Xperia 10 IV中是一个比前代略快的SoC。骁龙695 5G和骁龙690 5G的 Xperia 10 III都处于中低端，为日常使用提供了足够的性能，也能流畅地运行游戏。然而，该SoC并不是为计算量特别大的任务设计的，如视频编辑或同时打开多个应用程序的多任务。

在合成基准测试中，Xperia 10 IV及其骁龙695 5G只能在测试领域的较低范围内取得一席之地。除了Xperia 10 III之外，所有紧凑型对比设备都要快得多。就性能而言，Xperia 10 IV几乎没有从其前辈中脱颖而出。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Apple iPhone SE 2022 Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 4096	1741 Points +160%
Xiaomi 12 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	1237 Points +85%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	1145 Points +71%
Asus ZenFone 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384	1124 Points +68%
Average of class Smartphone (119 - 2138, n=219, last 2 years)	913 Points +36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (659 - 697, n=24)	676 Points +1%
Sony Xperia 10 IV Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	670 Points
Sony Xperia 10 III Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144	590 Points -12%
Multi-Core
Apple iPhone SE 2022 Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 4096	4788 Points +151%
Xiaomi 12 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	3581 Points +88%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	3474 Points +82%
Asus ZenFone 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384	3385 Points +77%
Average of class Smartphone (473 - 6681, n=219, last 2 years)	2996 Points +57%
Sony Xperia 10 IV Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	1909 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (1663 - 2038, n=24)	1904 Points 0%
Sony Xperia 10 III Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144	1716 Points -10%

Antutu v9 - Total Score
Xiaomi 12 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	982789 Points +154%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	813746 Points +111%
Asus ZenFone 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384	795730 Points +106%
Average of class Smartphone (102602 - 1650926, n=153, last 2 years)	738503 Points +91%
Apple iPhone SE 2022 Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 4096	733484 Points +90%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (344344 - 416086, n=18)	389461 Points +1%
Sony Xperia 10 IV Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	386185 Points
Sony Xperia 10 III Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144	344070 Points -11%

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Asus ZenFone 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384	16428 Points +138%
Xiaomi 12 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	14508 Points +110%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	14068 Points +104%
Average of class Smartphone (4761 - 21385, n=214, last 2 years)	11787 Points +71%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6897 - 11732, n=23)	9629 Points +40%
Sony Xperia 10 III Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144	8273 Points +20%
Sony Xperia 10 IV Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	6897 Points

CrossMark - Overall
Apple iPhone SE 2022 Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 4096	1132 Points +97%
Xiaomi 12 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	1109 Points +93%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	957 Points +67%
Average of class Smartphone (200 - 1474, n=165, last 2 years)	837 Points +46%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (521 - 606, n=18)	583 Points +2%
Sony Xperia 10 IV Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	574 Points

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Samsung Galaxy S22 Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	6991 Points +88%
Xiaomi 12 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	6860 Points +84%
Asus ZenFone 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384	6043 Points +62%
Average of class Smartphone (411 - 11438, n=166, last 2 years)	5759 Points +55%
Sony Xperia 10 IV Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	3721 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (3171 - 3848, n=19)	3648 Points -2%
Sony Xperia 10 III Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144	3092 Points -17%
System
Samsung Galaxy S22 Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	11210 Points +39%
Xiaomi 12 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	10334 Points +28%
Asus ZenFone 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384	9973 Points +24%
Average of class Smartphone (2376 - 16475, n=166, last 2 years)	9672 Points +20%
Sony Xperia 10 IV Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	8043 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6789 - 8231, n=19)	7725 Points -4%
Sony Xperia 10 III Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144	6586 Points -18%
Memory
Xiaomi 12 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	6535 Points +43%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	6413 Points +40%
Asus ZenFone 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384	6300 Points +38%
Average of class Smartphone (670 - 12716, n=166, last 2 years)	6267 Points +37%
Sony Xperia 10 IV Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	4580 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (3167 - 4836, n=19)	4227 Points -8%
Sony Xperia 10 III Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144	3176 Points -31%
Graphics
Xiaomi 12 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	18370 Points +316%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	17269 Points +291%
Average of class Smartphone (697 - 58651, n=166, last 2 years)	14220 Points +222%
Asus ZenFone 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384	13167 Points +198%
Sony Xperia 10 IV Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	4421 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (3975 - 4426, n=19)	4340 Points -2%
Sony Xperia 10 III Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144	3334 Points -25%
Web
Samsung Galaxy S22 Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	1924 Points +63%
Xiaomi 12 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	1785 Points +52%
Asus ZenFone 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384	1612 Points +37%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 2145, n=166, last 2 years)	1495 Points +27%
Sony Xperia 10 III Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144	1311 Points +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (1078 - 1434, n=19)	1253 Points +6%
Sony Xperia 10 IV Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	1178 Points

AImark - Score v2.x
Apple iPhone SE 2022 Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 4096	104532 Points +2011%
Sony Xperia 10 III Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144	40708 Points +722%
Average of class Smartphone (1043 - 139804, n=50, last 2 years)	21146 Points +327%
Xiaomi 12 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	6766 Points +37%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	6487 Points +31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (4924 - 5839, n=10)	5173 Points +4%
Sony Xperia 10 IV Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	4951 Points

GPU基准测试的结果也与合成基准测试的结果相同。Xperia 10 IV的速度略高于 Xperia 10 III(Adreno 619L)，其阿德诺619图形芯片，但不能与其他中档对手竞争。但在操作过程中，抽搐或其他停顿的情况很少发生。

GFXBench | GFXBench 3.1 | GFXBench 3.0 | GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | 3DMark

GFXBench
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	69 fps +527%
Apple iPhone SE 2022 A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD	60 fps +445%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	51 fps +364%
Asus ZenFone 8 Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	41 fps +273%
Sony Xperia 10 IV Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	11 fps
Sony Xperia 10 III Adreno 619L, SD 690 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	8 fps -27%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	39 fps +376%
Apple iPhone SE 2022 A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD	39 fps +376%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	29 fps +254%
Asus ZenFone 8 Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	26 fps +217%
Sony Xperia 10 IV Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	8.2 fps
Sony Xperia 10 III Adreno 619L, SD 690 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	5.8 fps -29%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	93 fps +417%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	66 fps +267%
Apple iPhone SE 2022 A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD	60 fps +233%
Asus ZenFone 8 Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	57 fps +217%
Sony Xperia 10 IV Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	18 fps
Sony Xperia 10 III Adreno 619L, SD 690 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	13 fps -28%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	99 fps +330%
Apple iPhone SE 2022 A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD	95.9 fps +317%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	67 fps +191%
Asus ZenFone 8 Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	64 fps +178%
Sony Xperia 10 IV Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	23 fps
Sony Xperia 10 III Adreno 619L, SD 690 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	16 fps -30%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	81 fps +406%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps +275%
Apple iPhone SE 2022 A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD	60 fps +275%
Asus ZenFone 8 Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	53 fps +231%
Sony Xperia 10 IV Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	16 fps
Sony Xperia 10 III Adreno 619L, SD 690 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	12 fps -25%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen
Apple iPhone SE 2022 A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD	82 fps +310%
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	78 fps +290%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	67 fps +235%
Asus ZenFone 8 Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	61 fps +205%
Sony Xperia 10 IV Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	20 fps
Sony Xperia 10 III Adreno 619L, SD 690 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	15 fps -25%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	121 fps +365%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	113 fps +335%
Asus ZenFone 8 Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	93 fps +258%
Apple iPhone SE 2022 A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD	60 fps +131%
Sony Xperia 10 IV Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	26 fps
Sony Xperia 10 III Adreno 619L, SD 690 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	21 fps -19%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	164 fps +369%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	123 fps +251%
Asus ZenFone 8 Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	105 fps +200%
Apple iPhone SE 2022 A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD	60 fps +71%
Sony Xperia 10 IV Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	35 fps
Sony Xperia 10 III Adreno 619L, SD 690 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	26 fps -26%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	121 fps +210%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	119 fps +205%
Asus ZenFone 8 Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	116 fps +197%
Apple iPhone SE 2022 A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD	60 fps +54%
Sony Xperia 10 IV Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	39 fps
Sony Xperia 10 III Adreno 619L, SD 690 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	30 fps -23%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	213 fps +344%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	193 fps +302%
Apple iPhone SE 2022 A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD	187 fps +290%
Asus ZenFone 8 Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	152 fps +217%
Sony Xperia 10 IV Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	48 fps
Sony Xperia 10 III Adreno 619L, SD 690 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	36 fps -25%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	121 fps +102%
Asus ZenFone 8 Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	119 fps +98%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	119 fps +98%
Apple iPhone SE 2022 A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD	60 fps 0%
Sony Xperia 10 IV Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	60 fps
Sony Xperia 10 III Adreno 619L, SD 690 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	54 fps -10%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	428 fps +351%
Apple iPhone SE 2022 A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD	358 fps +277%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	302 fps +218%
Asus ZenFone 8 Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	238 fps +151%
Sony Xperia 10 IV Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	95 fps
Sony Xperia 10 III Adreno 619L, SD 690 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	72 fps -24%

3DMark
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2418 Points +581%
Apple iPhone SE 2022 A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD	1877 Points +429%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1855 Points +423%
Asus ZenFone 8 Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1512 Points +326%
Sony Xperia 10 IV Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	355 Points
Sony Xperia 10 III Adreno 619L, SD 690 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	247 Points -30%
Wild Life Extreme
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2586 Points +616%
Apple iPhone SE 2022 A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD	2399 Points +565%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1946 Points +439%
Asus ZenFone 8 Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1528 Points +323%
Sony Xperia 10 IV Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	361 Points
Sony Xperia 10 III Adreno 619L, SD 690 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	252 Points -30%
Wild Life Unlimited Score
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	9782 Points +710%
Apple iPhone SE 2022 A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD	8909 Points +638%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	7458 Points +517%
Asus ZenFone 8 Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	5821 Points +382%
Sony Xperia 10 IV Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	1208 Points
Sony Xperia 10 III Adreno 619L, SD 690 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	826 Points -32%
Wild Life Score
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	9713 Points +701%
Apple iPhone SE 2022 A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD	8357 Points +590%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	7064 Points +483%
Asus ZenFone 8 Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	5767 Points +376%
Sony Xperia 10 IV Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	1212 Points
Sony Xperia 10 III Adreno 619L, SD 690 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	826 Points -32%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics
Sony Xperia 10 III Adreno 619L, SD 690 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	2775 Points 0%
Sony Xperia 10 IV Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	2769 Points
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Points -100%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Points -100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics
Sony Xperia 10 IV Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	2730 Points
Sony Xperia 10 III Adreno 619L, SD 690 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	1878 Points -31%
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Points -100%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Points -100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited
Sony Xperia 10 IV Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	2739 Points
Sony Xperia 10 III Adreno 619L, SD 690 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	2023 Points -26%
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Points -100%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Points -100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Asus ZenFone 8 Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4771 Points +36%
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4303 Points +23%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4000 Points +14%
Sony Xperia 10 IV Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	3510 Points
Sony Xperia 10 III Adreno 619L, SD 690 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	3344 Points -5%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	18286 Points +512%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	11893 Points +298%
Asus ZenFone 8 Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	11552 Points +286%
Sony Xperia 10 IV Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	2990 Points
Sony Xperia 10 III Adreno 619L, SD 690 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	2120 Points -29%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	10618 Points +243%
Asus ZenFone 8 Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	8779 Points +184%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	8268 Points +167%
Sony Xperia 10 IV Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	3092 Points
Sony Xperia 10 III Adreno 619L, SD 690 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	2308 Points -25%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics
Sony Xperia 10 IV Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	3446 Points
Sony Xperia 10 III Adreno 619L, SD 690 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	3254 Points -6%
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Points -100%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Points -100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics
Sony Xperia 10 IV Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	4311 Points
Sony Xperia 10 III Adreno 619L, SD 690 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	3204 Points -26%
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Points -100%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Points -100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0
Sony Xperia 10 IV Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	4083 Points
Sony Xperia 10 III Adreno 619L, SD 690 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	3215 Points -21%
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Points -100%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Points -100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Sony Xperia 10 IV Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	2934 Points
Sony Xperia 10 III Adreno 619L, SD 690 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	2178 Points -26%
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Points -100%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Points -100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Sony Xperia 10 IV Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	2830 Points
Sony Xperia 10 III Adreno 619L, SD 690 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	1992 Points -30%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	0 Points -100%
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Points -100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Sony Xperia 10 IV Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	3370 Points
Sony Xperia 10 III Adreno 619L, SD 690 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	3236 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	0 Points -100%
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Points -100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited
Asus ZenFone 8 Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	10379 Points +144%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	10206 Points +140%
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	9693 Points +128%
Sony Xperia 10 IV Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	4256 Points
Sony Xperia 10 III Adreno 619L, SD 690 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	3122 Points -27%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	24177 Points +431%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	17842 Points +292%
Asus ZenFone 8 Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	15652 Points +244%
Sony Xperia 10 IV Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	4552 Points
Sony Xperia 10 III Adreno 619L, SD 690 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	3315 Points -27%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics
Asus ZenFone 8 Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4763 Points +37%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4086 Points +18%
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	3754 Points +8%
Sony Xperia 10 IV Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	3468 Points
Sony Xperia 10 III Adreno 619L, SD 690 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	2593 Points -25%

在浏览器基准测试中，索尼智能手机的速度也比竞争对手慢，只能击败Xperia 10 III然而，网站的加载速度很快，可以迅速滚动浏览。

Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | WebXPRT 3 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone SE 2022 (Chrome 99)	182.6 Points +218%
Xiaomi 12 (Chrome 99.0.4844.58)	113.8 Points +98%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 351, n=173, last 2 years)	106.1 Points +85%
Samsung Galaxy S22 (Chrome 100.0.4896.79)	96.4 Points +68%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (48.6 - 105.3, n=19)	71.2 Points +24%
Sony Xperia 10 IV (Chrome 103.0.5060.129)	57.351 Points
Sony Xperia 10 III (Chrome 91)	45.36 Points -21%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPhone SE 2022 (Chome 99)	239 runs/min +417%
Samsung Galaxy S22 (Chrome 100.0.4896.79)	111 runs/min +140%
Average of class Smartphone (14.9 - 445, n=157, last 2 years)	107.1 runs/min +132%
Xiaomi 12 (Chrome 99.0.4844.58)	107 runs/min +132%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (38.7 - 80.1, n=16)	54 runs/min +17%
Sony Xperia 10 IV (Chrome 103.0.5060.129)	46.2 runs/min
Sony Xperia 10 III (Chrome 91)	41.2 runs/min -11%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Apple iPhone SE 2022 (Chrome 99)	265 Points +240%
Asus ZenFone 8 (Chrome 90)	149 Points +91%
Samsung Galaxy S22 (Chrome 100.0.4896.79)	149 Points +91%
Xiaomi 12 (Chrome 99.0.4844.58)	148 Points +90%
Average of class Smartphone (39 - 304, n=122, last 2 years)	133.1 Points +71%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (75 - 156, n=12)	101 Points +29%
Sony Xperia 10 IV (Chrome 103.0.5060.129)	78 Points
Sony Xperia 10 III (Chrome 91)	74 Points -5%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone SE 2022 (Chrome 99)	65969 Points +202%
Samsung Galaxy S22 (Chrome 100.0.4896.79)	38992 Points +79%
Asus ZenFone 8 (Chrome 90)	37926 Points +74%
Xiaomi 12 (Chrome 99.0.4844.58)	37279 Points +71%
Average of class Smartphone (4633 - 89112, n=213, last 2 years)	33503 Points +53%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (17849 - 31647, n=21)	24051 Points +10%
Sony Xperia 10 IV (Chrome 103.0.5060.129)	21839 Points
Sony Xperia 10 III	16866 Points -23%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Sony Xperia 10 III (Chrome 91)	2506 ms * -26%
Sony Xperia 10 IV (Chrome 103.0.5060.129)	1981.7 ms *
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (1298 - 2501, n=18)	1769 ms * +11%
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=173, last 2 years)	1595 ms * +20%
Samsung Galaxy S22 (Chrome 100.0.4896.79)	1566 ms * +21%
Asus ZenFone 8 (Chrome 90)	1397 ms * +30%
Xiaomi 12 (Chrome 99.0.4844.58)	930 ms * +53%
Apple iPhone SE 2022 (Chrome 99)	497.2 ms * +75%

* ... smaller is better

凭借其UFS 2.1存储，Xperia 10 IV实现了稳固的数据传输率。然而，它的速度比Xperia 10 III顺序阅读，这一点从稍长的应用程序加载时间可以看出。

	Sony Xperia 10 IV	Asus ZenFone 8	Samsung Galaxy S22	Sony Xperia 10 III	Xiaomi 12	Average 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		100%	93%	13%	164%	-10%	99%
Sequential Read 256KB	521.1	1781 242%	1486 185%	840 61%	1851 255%	760 ?(427 - 1011, n=113) 46%	1508 ?(226 - 4512, n=218, last 2 years) 189%
Sequential Write 256KB	497.61	767 54%	993 100%	400.8 -19%	1417 185%	297 ?(13.6 - 719, n=113) -40%	1118 ?(57.5 - 3678, n=218, last 2 years) 125%
Random Read 4KB	192.5	292.3 52%	273 42%	172.3 -10%	325.2 69%	152.9 ?(92.6 - 239, n=113) -21%	247 ?(22.2 - 543, n=218, last 2 years) 28%
Random Write 4KB	177.83	272.9 53%	257.6 45%	210.7 18%	437.5 146%	131.6 ?(18.2 - 290, n=113) -26%	272 ?(13 - 709, n=218, last 2 years) 53%

游戏 - 对休闲游戏者来说是可以的

ǞǞǞ 阿德雷诺619图形芯片集成在骁龙695 5G在性能方面属于中低端，就像SoC一样。即便如此，它的功率也足以运行当前的游戏而不受重大限制。例如，《PUBG移动版》可以在 "高清/高 "状态下以恒定的30FPS流畅地玩。在图形更简单的Armajet中，甚至比60 FPS更高的帧率也是可能的，但60 Hz的面板不允许更多。

帧率是用我们的Gamebench测试工具确定。

Sony Xperia 10 IV; Armajet; 1.61.6: Ø60 (56-61)

Sony Xperia 10 IV; PUBG Mobile; 2.1.0: Ø29.9 (28-31)

排放 - 单声道扬声器和高分辨率音频

温度

在温度方面，Xperia 10 IV在任何时候都能愉快地使用，因为即使在永久负载的情况下，智能手机的温度最高也只有33.4℃。在内部，一切都保持凉爽。正如3D-Mark压力测试所显示的，从第一次到最后一次测试运行，几乎没有性能损失。

Max. Load

Idle


31.1 °C	31 °C	29.3 °C
31.1 °C	31 °C	29.2 °C
30.5 °C	31.4 °C	29.2 °C

Maximum: 31.4 °C
Average: 30.4 °C


28.9 °C	29.6 °C	32.3 °C
26.6 °C	29.7 °C	33.4 °C
28.3 °C	30.5 °C	33.4 °C

Maximum: 33.4 °C
Average: 30.3 °C

Room Temperature 21.8 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260

(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 30.4 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 31.4 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.4 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.6 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Sony Xperia 10 IV Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	99.6 %
Sony Xperia 10 III Adreno 619L, SD 690 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	99.4 % 0%
Asus ZenFone 8 Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	92.3 % -7%
Apple iPhone SE 2022 A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD	79.5 % -20%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	56.4 % -43%
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	46.3 % -54%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Sony Xperia 10 III Adreno 619L, SD 690 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	99.2 % 0%
Sony Xperia 10 IV Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	98.9 %
Asus ZenFone 8 Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	85.5 % -14%
Apple iPhone SE 2022 A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD	61.4 % -38%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	56 % -43%
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	% -100%

Sony Xperia 10 IV Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø2.15 (2.14-2.16)

Apple iPhone SE 2022 A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 0.0.0.0: Ø10.7 (9.12-14.9)

Samsung Galaxy S22 Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø7.78 (6.63-11.8)

Sony Xperia 10 IV Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.24 (7.24-7.27)

Apple iPhone SE 2022 A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø40.3 (39-49)

Samsung Galaxy S22 Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø27.2 (23.6-41.9)

Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø35.6 (27.5-59.4)

发言人

Xperia 10 IV的单声道扬声器位于显示屏底部的一个小凹槽中。这个小的声膜很好地完成了它的工作，但只产生了一个没有低音的细小声音。作为回报，该扬声器传输的中音和高音非常均衡，从而非常清晰地再现了声音。

耳机和其他外部音频设备可以通过3.5毫米插孔或蓝牙5.1连接到索尼智能手机上。支持常见的蓝牙编解码器，如AAC、LDAC和aptX Adaptive。

使用兼容的耳机，你也可以通过有线和无线连接享受高分辨率的音频。然而，3.5毫米音频插孔的信噪比只有75.71dBFS的平均水平，在这里并不适合。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Sony Xperia 10 IV audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.9% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 29% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 50% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Sony Xperia 10 III audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 35.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 37% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 56% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命--很难变小，但充电时间长

消耗功率

索尼并没有在其智能手机中加入电源适配器。用户要么用可选的30瓦的XQZ-UC1快速充电器或任何其他触手可及的电源适配器。由于索尼对电源适配器收取近50美元的费用，第二种选择听起来更吸引人。然而，与我们不同，你需要一点运气来确保你有正确的电源适配器。

索尼Xperia 10 IV支持USB Power Delivery（PD），最大功率为30瓦。官方电源适配器为其量身定做，完美匹配。这个充电能力也可以通过第三方电源实现，但不能保证。

索尼智能手机并不太喜欢我们的第三方电源适配器，大概是因为与原始电源的安培数有偏差。例子。连接到Anker的24瓦电源，智能手机只提取了最大的7.5瓦，这意味着充满电需要3.5小时以上。当然，这个结果不具有代表性，但表明如果你想在索尼电源适配器上省钱，可能很难找到合适的电源适配器。

在耗电量方面，索尼Xperia 10 IV并不显眼。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.08 / 0.41 Watt
Idle	0.68 / 1.69 / 1.73 Watt
Load	2.54 / 4.61 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Sony Xperia 10 IV 5000 mAh	Apple iPhone SE 2022 2018 mAh	Asus ZenFone 8 4000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S22 3700 mAh	Sony Xperia 10 III 4500 mAh	Xiaomi 12 4500 mAh	Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		-45%	-14%	-42%	24%	-36%	-23%	-42%
Idle Minimum *	0.68	0.6 12%	0.82 -21%	0.69 -1%	0.44 35%	0.87 -28%	0.886 ?(0.56 - 1.2, n=18) -30%	0.897 ?(0.42 - 2.37, n=162, last 2 years) -32%
Idle Average *	1.69	0.9 47%	1.1 35%	1.19 30%	0.65 62%	1.7 -1%	1.76 ?(0.91 - 4.76, n=18) -4%	1.452 ?(0.69 - 4.26, n=162, last 2 years) 14%
Idle Maximum *	1.73	1.5 13%	1.16 33%	1.26 27%	0.69 60%	1.82 -5%	1.92 ?(0.98 - 4.79, n=18) -11%	1.629 ?(0.79 - 4.45, n=162, last 2 years) 6%
Load Average *	2.54	6.5 -156%	4.24 -67%	6.97 -174%	2.99 -18%	4.68 -84%	3.86 ?(2.4 - 9.52, n=18) -52%	5.55 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=162, last 2 years) -119%
Load Maximum *	4.61	11 -139%	6.83 -48%	8.85 -92%	5.42 -18%	7.41 -61%	5.45 ?(4.32 - 9.92, n=18) -18%	8.31 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=162, last 2 years) -80%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Sony Xperia 10 IV Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G: Ø2.7 (0.847-5.2)

Sony Xperia 10 III Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G: Ø3.14 (0.646-5.32)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

Sony Xperia 10 IV Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø3.01 (2.8-3.26)

Sony Xperia 10 III Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø2.36 (1.325-3.02)

Sony Xperia 10 IV Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.969 (0.917-1.237)

Sony Xperia 10 III Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.632 (0.551-1.167)

电池寿命

紧凑型智能手机通常只有一个小电池，这意味着运行时间通常不令人印象深刻。这通常适用于Android 系列的设备。在Apple 智能手机中，所有的系统组件都经过了更精细的调整，这就是为什么即使是小型设备如iPhone SE (2022)有非常有竞争力的运行时间。iPhone SE（2022）的电池容量为2018毫安时，按照Android 的标准，它的电池容量非常小。

索尼Xperia 10 IV在电池寿命方面从竞争中脱颖而出，有两个积极方面。首先，因为它有一个非常大的电池（5000毫安时），适合其紧凑的格式。其次，因为一次电池充电就能帮助它实现出色的运行时间，这是其他对比设备无法比拟的。

在测试中，模拟网络冲浪持续了19小时以上，连续视频播放甚至持续了26小时。即使在最大负荷的情况下，电池也会有很强的表现，持续时间刚刚超过7小时。在实践中，人们应该合理地期望智能手机在需要充电之前能够持续两天，即使是在密集使用的情况下。

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		62h 40min
WiFi Websurfing		19h 28min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		26h 18min
Load (maximum brightness)		7h 9min

	Sony Xperia 10 IV 5000 mAh	Apple iPhone SE 2022 2018 mAh	Asus ZenFone 8 4000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S22 3700 mAh	Sony Xperia 10 III 4500 mAh	Xiaomi 12 4500 mAh
Battery Runtime		-48%	-62%	-38%	-18%	-30%
Reader / Idle	3760	2049 -46%		2182 -42%	2272 -40%	2558 -32%
H.264	1578	797 -49%		887 -44%	1411 -11%	890 -44%
WiFi v1.3	1168	769 -34%	442 -62%	675 -42%	809 -31%	760 -35%
Load	429	164 -62%		324 -24%	479 12%	385 -10%

Pros

+ 非常薄的外壳

+ 防尘和防水

+ 优秀的电池运行时间

+ 真彩色AMOLED显示屏

+ 设备。NFC、双SIM卡、eSIM

Cons

- 帧率只有60赫兹

- 平庸的相机

- 不包含电源

对索尼Xperia 10 IV的评判

索尼的Xperia 10 IV是一款不错的中档智能手机，拥有强大的硬件和足够的性能，适合日常使用。除了具有非常好的图像质量的AMOLED显示屏外，还有5G、真正的双SIM卡，以及通过microSD卡扩展内存的选项。还包括一个3.5毫米音频插孔和IP认证。

Xperia 10 IV在竞争中脱颖而出，主要是因为它的外形设计和电池寿命。其21:9的格式使智能手机特别纤细，让人感觉是一个更小的设备。此外，宽屏格式和集成在边框中的自拍相机确保了电影的显示没有黑区。

索尼的Xperia 10 IV是一款非常苗条的中档智能手机，具有强大的功能和出色的电池运行时间，但在显示屏和相机方面却显得有些磕磕绊绊。

小巧的智能手机往往伴随着不引人注目的电池运行时间。Xperia 10 IV则相反，它从5000毫安时的电池中提取了出色的电池运行时间，几乎没有任何其他紧凑型智能手机能与之相比。

我们的总体积极印象只在几个地方有所动摇。AMOLED屏幕的刷新率只有60赫兹，这对这个价格范围来说是不合适的。三合一相机也给人留下了混合印象。它在白天拍摄的照片还不错，但快门延迟时间相当长，夜间照片几乎无法使用。SoC本来也可以更快，因为你注意到智能手机在使用过程中偶尔会达到其性能极限。

索尼Xperia 10 IV的替代品是，例如小米12和华硕ZenFone 8.两者的速度都更快，价格相近，并提供120赫兹的AMOLED显示屏。

价格和可用性

索尼Xperia 10 IV在美国通过亚马逊发售，售价429.99美元。，而在英国，售价为370.00英镑.法国和意大利分别以449,96欧元和495,00欧元的价格提供该智能手机。印度亚马逊也提供两种颜色的智能手机，价格为42,999.00欧元。

Sony Xperia 10 IV - 2022-09-12 09/12/2022 v7
Manuel Masiero

Chassis

87%

Keyboard

69 / 75 → 92%

Pointing Device

89%

Connectivity

51 / 70 → 73%

Weight

91%

Battery

93%

Display

92%

Games Performance

34 / 64 → 53%

Application Performance

74 / 86 → 86%

Temperature

94%

Noise

100%

Audio

76 / 90 → 84%

Camera

53%

Average

77%

83%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Jacob Fisher - Translator - 915 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2022

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 389263 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 索尼Xperia 10 IV智能手机评论。具有出色电池寿命的迷你智能手机

Manuel Masiero, 2022-09-15 (Update: 2022-09-15)

索尼Xperia 10 IV智能手机评论。具有出色电池寿命的迷你智能手机

潜在的竞争对手比较

外壳 - 由于其21:9的格式，非常纤薄

尺寸比较

设备 - 通知LED和支持eSIM

微型SD卡读卡器

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

软件 -Android 12与Xperia UI

通信和GNSS - 快速WiFi 5和单频GNSS

电话和语音质量

照相机 - 带有光学图像稳定功能的迟钝的三联相机

附件和保修 - 30瓦的电源适配器需要额外收费

输入设备和操作 - 愉快的触觉和可扩展的显示

显示屏 - 60赫兹的清晰显示

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

性能 - 性能稳定，但几乎不比前代产品快

游戏 - 对休闲游戏者来说是可以的

排放 - 单声道扬声器和高分辨率音频

温度

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

发言人

Sony Xperia 10 IV audio analysis

Sony Xperia 10 III audio analysis

电池寿命--很难变小，但充电时间长

消耗功率

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

电池寿命

Pros

Cons

对索尼Xperia 10 IV的评判

价格和可用性

More articles related to this device

Pricecompare