Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
Specifications

Secondary Camera: 8 MPix f/1.9
Price comparison
Average of 38 scores (from 69 reviews)
Reviews for the Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
令人瞩目的更新。 三星最新发布的中档Galaxy A3智能手机不仅更新了玻璃和金属的一体式设计,而且还做出了重大改进,例如处理器能力的增强和相机性能的改善。这是否足以告诉其竞争对手,谁是赢家?
Source: Know Your Mobile
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionA really excellent phone with a tremendous amount of bang for your buck. Dominates most every other phone at this price.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 07/03/2018
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Techradar
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionSamsung has created another solid mid-range smartphone contender, and this one looks and feels more like its high-end brothers than ever.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/09/2018
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Techradar
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionSamsung has created another solid mid-range smartphone contender, and this one looks and feels more like its high-end brothers than ever.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/16/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Techradar
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionSamsung has created another solid mid-range smartphone contender, and this one looks and feels more like its high-end brothers than ever.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/27/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Recombu
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionDespite its standing in the company’s current product lineup, for the most part, Samsung hasn’t skimped on quality with this mid-ranger. Its design and build quality are unquestionably excellent with useful inclusions like water resistance, USB-C and a fingerprint sensor to boot.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/13/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Techradar
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionSamsung has created another solid mid-range smartphone contender, and this one looks and feels more like its high-end brothers than ever.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/31/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Laptop Media
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionNowadays, finding an Android smartphone with a screen smaller than 5 inches is definitely not an easy task, especially if you insist on good technical specifications. The rich Samsung portfolio, however, includes such feature in Galaxy A3 (2017). It combines the sleek and stylish design of the flagship Galaxy S7 with slightly more compact dimensions, providing a convenient one-hand operation. The downside of the design section, however, is that fingerprints make their way onto the corpus very easily. Additionally, the small body includes a small battery but apparently not bad endurance. Our tests ranked Galaxy A3 (2017) among the models with the best battery life.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/29/2017
Source: Tech Advisor
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionOverall, the A3's improvements for 2017 are pretty significant and make this nice-size, reasonably priced phone even more appealing for those who like the idea of the Galaxy S7 but can't quite stretch their budget that far. Its waterproofing and fingerprint sensor are both convenient and practical, and the good-looking design makes it easy to forget that this phone has a price tag that's half that of many flagship phones.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/27/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Trusted Reviews
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionHowever, if you’re the kind to shop around, are a big gamer, or tend to read/watch a lot of content on your phone, then it's possible to get more for your money. The obvious alternative is the Lenovo Moto G5 Plus, which has a sharper screen for a lower price.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/23/2017
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 70% performance: 70% display: 70% mobility: 80% workmanship: 90%
Source: Tech Advisor
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionOverall, the A3's improvements for 2017 are pretty significant and make this nice-size, reasonably priced phone even more appealing for those who like the idea of the Galaxy S7 but can't quite stretch their budget that far. Its waterproofing and fingerprint sensor are both convenient and practical, and the good-looking design makes it easy to forget that this phone has a price tag that's half that of many flagship phones.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/13/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Phone Arena
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionThe Galaxy A3 (2017) is such an exciting phone: it brings a level of sophistication in design and interface that we have not yet seen on affordable phones. Neither have we seen a phone with water resistance.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/12/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: GSM Arena
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionThat's usually good news, it's a clear sign that the phone fills a specific hole in the market. The Samsung Galaxy A3 (2017) has the potential to become a quiet hit - it won't put the iPhone 7 and Galaxy S7 out of business, but it will rescue many people from overspending on a flagship they didn't need.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/16/2017
Source: Trusted Reviews
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionSamsung says the Galaxy A3 will retail around the £299 mark. That price point is a tough nut to crack – Wileyfox, Motorola, Honor and others are doing great stuff and arguably offering better value for money than Samsung.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/06/2017
Source: Techradar
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionIf you’re looking for a smaller version of the Galaxy A range, this should suit you but there are a few areas which feature slightly disappointing spec.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/05/2017
Source: Tech Stage
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/13/2017
Source: Android Mag
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/10/2017
Rating: Total score: 92% price: 91%
Source: Teltarif
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/01/2017
Rating: Total score: 76% price: 97% display: 70% mobility: 80%
Source: Verivox
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/06/2017
Rating: Total score: 74% features: 69% ergonomy: 83%
Source: Chip.de
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/15/2017
Rating: Total score: 81% performance: 85% features: 70% display: 98% mobility: 98%
Source: Computerbild - 4/2017

Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 02/15/2017
Rating: Total score: 98%
Source: Android Pit
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/11/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Netzwelt
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/06/2017
Rating: Total score: 70% features: 60% mobility: 60% workmanship: 90%
Source: Android Mag
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionComparison, online available, Very Short, Date: 02/05/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Allround-PC.com
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/29/2017
Source: n-tv
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/27/2017
Source: PCtipp.ch
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionComparison, online available, Short, Date: 01/26/2017
Source: A1 Blog
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/18/2017
Source: Tech Stage
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/16/2017
Source: Curved
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/10/2017
Rating: Total score: 84% performance: 76% display: 82% mobility: 82%
Source: Netzwelt
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/06/2017
Source: Curved
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionComparison, online available, Long, Date: 01/02/2017
Source: Android Pit - 2/2017

Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 01/01/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Mi Mundo Gadget
ES→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/13/2017
Source: Tuexperto
ES→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/12/2017
Source: HDblog.it
IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/17/2017
Rating: Total score: 86%
Source: Smartphone e tablet android
IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/16/2017
Rating: performance: 70% display: 70% mobility: 70% workmanship: 70%
Source: Leonardo.it Tech
IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/16/2017
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 77% features: 70% display: 84% mobility: 80% ergonomy: 95%
Source: AndroidWorld.it
IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/16/2017
Rating: Total score: 84% price: 60% features: 75% display: 85% mobility: 80%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi
IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/09/2017
Rating: Total score: 78% price: 63% display: 80% mobility: 85% workmanship: 82%
Source: AndroidPit.it
IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/08/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: AndroidPit.it
IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/30/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: All About Phones
NL→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/17/2017
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Computer Totaal
NL→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/17/2017
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Les Mobiles
FR→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/29/2017
Rating: Total score: 86%
Source: Top for Phone
FR→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/02/2017
Source: 01Net
FR→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/13/2017
Rating: Total score: 82% performance: 70% mobility: 90%
Source: Frandroid
FR→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/11/2017
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 70% display: 90% mobility: 80% workmanship: 90%
Source: AndroidPit.fr
FR→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/03/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Product Test
RU→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/18/2017
Rating: Total score: 80% display: 86% mobility: 78%
Source: Hi-Tech Mail
RU→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/10/2017
Source: Hitech Vesti
RU→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/09/2017
Source: Product Test
RU→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/03/2017
Source: CNews.cz
CZ→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/02/2017
Source: The Gioididong
VN→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/03/2017
Source: XT Mobile
VN→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/05/2017
Source: The Gioididong
VN→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/27/2017
Source: Tinh Te
VN→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/27/2017
Source: Zing
VN→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/24/2017
Source: Zing
VN→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/21/2017
Source: Zing
VN→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/16/2017
Source: The Gioididong
VN→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/11/2017
Source: The Gioididong
VN→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/19/2017
Source: Tablet.bg
BU→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/20/2017
Rating: Total score: 83% performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 85% workmanship: 90%
Source: Smartphone.bg
BU→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/02/2017
Source: Smartphone.bg
BU→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/20/2017
Source: Mere Mobil.dk
DA→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/02/2017
Rating: Total score: 50%
Source: Mobil.se
SV→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/22/2017
Rating: Total score: 74%
Source: Android Portal
SK→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/07/2017
Rating: Total score: 78% display: 80% mobility: 70% workmanship: 90%
Source: Computerblog.ro
→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/27/2017
Comment
ARM Mali-T830 MP1:
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
7870 Octa:
Exynos 7集成八个主频高达1.6 GHz的Cortex-A53核心,采用14纳米工艺制造。它同时集成ARM Mali T830-MP2显卡和双通道内存控制器(LPDDR3-1866)。
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
