Pros
Cons
三星Galaxy A17 5G 是一款入门级Android 手机,定位在 150 欧元至 200 欧元之间,重点是使用寿命和核心功能,而不是原始速度。它配备了一块 6.7 英寸 90Hz AMOLED 显示屏和大猩猩 Victus 玻璃,机身达到 IP54 防护等级,比去年的机型更薄、更轻。5,000mAh 电池和 25W 充电支持长时间运行,存储空间可通过共享的 microSD 插槽进行扩展。相机配置方面,5000 万像素主传感器配备 OIS,并配有超广角镜头和微距镜头,另外还有一个 1300 万像素自拍摄像头,可拍摄 1080p 视频。在所有评测中,最大的妥协是性能:Exynos 1330,尤其是 4GB RAM 配置,可能会让人感觉迟滞或不那么面向未来。它的突出优势是软件支持,承诺到 2031 年提供多年的操作系统和安全更新,这使它成为预算紧张情况下日常基本使用的安全之选。
Specifications

Secondary Camera: 13 MPix f/2.0
Price comparison
Average of 24 scores (from 40 reviews)
Reviews for the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G
Galaxy A17 5G 的 5G 版本旨在再次成为入门级用户的领先手机。它的功能包括保证到 2031 年的安全更新、90 Hz AMOLED 显示屏以及比去年更轻薄的机身。但这足以保持竞争力吗?
Source: PC Mag
EN→zh-CNThe Galaxy A17 is a respectable entry-level offering from Samsung. For under $200, you get a phone with a decent build, a good screen, solid battery life, the ability to handle daily tasks, good photo quality, and six years of updates. I wish the phone had a new processor on board, which could help with its performance over time. If you have a Galaxy A16, the overall experience is hardly different, and there is no reason to upgrade to the A17. However, if your existing phone is nearing its end of life and you don't want to overspend, the Samsung Galaxy A17 handles the basics well enough to earn our Editors' Choice award.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/19/2026
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Engadget
EN→zh-CNIf you are hard-capped at $200, the Samsung Galaxy A17 is a surprisingly impressive device. It's got a solid build, decent cameras with a handful of different lenses, respectable battery life and even a built-in microSD card slot for extra storage. You even get six years of OS and security updates, which is significantly longer than almost all of its similarly-priced rivals. And while its performance could be smoother, it's not laggy enough to get truly bothered about on a phone this affordable. For those with wiggle room in their gadget allowance, I would seriously consider looking at a version with 8GB of RAM, which is just $30 more.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/03/2026
Rating: Total score: 77%
Source: Android Headlines
EN→zh-CNSimilar to most other budget phones, this all depends on what you need from your phone and what you do with your phone. If you just need a phone to make phone calls, send texts, and check the score of the game, then the Galaxy A17 is a great, affordable option. But if you’re looking for a better camera, battery life, display, and performance, then you’ll want to look elsewhere. Another good option that doesn’t break the bank is going to be the Galaxy S25 FE, Galaxy A36, and Galaxy A56. More expensive but still typically under $500.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/27/2026
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Tech Advisor
EN→zh-CNThese are two of the most accomplished budget phones on the market, but they’re surprisingly different. The Samsung Galaxy A17 5G is your safe bet, offering a familiar Samsung experience with a solid design and lengthy software support at a sub-£200/$200 (just about) price. You really can’t go wrong. However, the CMF Phone 2 Pro is the more interesting phone by far. It’s also just flat-out better in most respects. Its industrial design is more appealing, its performance is far superior, and its camera system is more advanced than on Samsung’s budget phone. However, it’s not widely available in the US.
Comparison, online available, Short, Date: 01/22/2026
Source: Phone Arena
EN→zh-CNDespite its shortcomings, the Galaxy A17 5G is a great find for shoppers on a tight budget. The recommended starting price is $200, but almost from the launch date, the phone is discounted to an even more palatable $170. That's a great price. Still, you have to understand that this phone definitely feels on the slow side and it will not be a great fit for someone used to quickly switching between apps or for heavier users. Those people would benefit a lot from a faster processor, which you can find on devices like the Galaxy A3X series priced in the $350-$400 tier. What are your alternatives in the $200 price class? For US buyers, there are very few. The Moto G (2026) is probably the closest match at the same $200 starting price and same 128GB of base storage.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/16/2026
Rating: Total score: 56% performance: 25% display: 60% mobility: 81% workmanship: 40%
Source: The Indian Express
EN→zh-CNThe Galaxy A17 is a solid budget smartphone for its asking price. Its battery life, display quality and long-term software support make it a great value option if you want a device that can comfortably last you nearly half a decade. However, the Exynos 1330’s middling performance, occasional lags and stutters, and the single speaker setup hold it back. If you need a reliable secondary phone or simply want a device with years of updates and a capable camera, the Galaxy A17 fits the bill. But if performance and a higher refresh rate are priorities, you’re better off considering alternatives like the Realme P4, CMF Phone 2, Infinix GT 30 or Motorola Edge 50 Neo.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 12/14/2025
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Tech Advisor
EN→zh-CNTypically, our answer to this question for Samsung’s hugely popular budget Galaxy A phones is a big yes. However, it’s not that straightforward this time. While it’s good to see Samsung keep the same price as two generations ago, there’s been almost no innovation or improvement to this phone compared to the Galaxy A16 5G. In fact, in almost 15 years of reviewing phones, I can’t think of another phone so similar to its predecessor. Samsung has changed the look of the camera module on the back, added OIS to the main camera and made the handset a little thinner and lighter. But when it has the same screen, processor, core camera specs, battery, charging, memory, storage (and I could keep going), this doesn’t feel worthy of an annual refresh.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/05/2025
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: The Times of India
EN→zh-CNSamsung Galaxy A17 5G presents a compelling package for those seeking a budget-friendly smartphone without compromising on essential features. Its robust design, vibrant display and versatile camera system, the handset is a solid choice at Rs 18,999 (starting price). While it may not match flagship devices in terms of processing power, it delivers consistent and satisfactory performance for everyday use. For those prioritizing value and functionality, the Galaxy A17 5G is a commendable option.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/01/2025
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Think Digit
EN→zh-CNThe Samsung Galaxy A17 5G arrives barely a year after the A16, and at first glance, you might struggle to tell them apart. Samsung’s A-series has long been the company’s safety net. The phones are dependable, predictable and designed for people who want a Samsung experience without paying flagship money. The A17 continues that philosophy, but this time, it feels a bit more refined rather than revolutionary. Starting at Rs 18,999 for the base 6GB + 128GB variant and going up to Rs 23,499 for the top 8GB + 256GB model, the Galaxy A17 sits right in the same competitive Rs 20,000 bracket where phones like the CMF Phone 2 Pro and Moto Edge 60 Fusion are fighting tooth and nail for attention. On paper, Samsung hasn’t reinvented the formula, but it has added polish where it matters.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/14/2025
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 69% performance: 62% workmanship: 78%
Source: 91mobiles
EN→zh-CNThe Galaxy A17 improves on its predecessor with OIS, a bundled charger, and unmatched six years of software support. The handset also offers a sleek design, a bright AMOLED display, and reliable low-light performance. However, at a starting price of Rs 18,999, the dated Exynos 1330 limits performance, battery life is average, and charging is slower than rivals. Be that as it may, the Galaxy A17 isn’t trying to be a performance-focused phone, so you might want to consider alternatives on this front. But for a good display, Samsung’s UI and long-term updates, the A17 is worth considering.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/20/2025
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 77% display: 80% mobility: 78% workmanship: 80%
Source: Gadgetbyte Nepal
EN→zh-CNAt a price of around NPR 30,000, the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G is a solid choice if you prefer a Samsung phone. For performance-focused users who want to play games, alternatives like the Redmi Note 14 or CMF Phone 1 may be better. However, for normal social media use, calls, and good camera quality, the A17 is a reliable option. The 8GB variant offers slightly better performance. The Galaxy A17 5G feels surprisingly premium for a budget phone, with a bright display and solid camera. It handles social media and calls well, and the battery lasts long with One UI making it easy to use. However, performance is not good enough, as it uses the Exynos 1330 chipset from the A14 5G three years ago.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/01/2025
Rating: Total score: 75% price: 80% performance: 65% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: GSM Arena

The Galaxy A17 5G is your second-cheapest option from the Samsung portfolio, making it an ideal entry-level solution for Samsung fans and Samsung even offers long software support with promised 6 years of major OS upgrades. Check out our video review to learn ALL YOU NEED TO KNOW about the phone's top features, build and screen quality, battery life, performance, and camera image quality.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/21/2025
Source: GSM Arena
EN→zh-CNThe Galaxy A17 5G is meant to be a low-priced phone with a decent design and long software support from Samsung, but at its current pricing, it's far from competitive in its price bracket. You can easily find more powerful smarrtphones with longer battery life, faster charging and brighter displays with HDR support. Perhaps the biggest issue we had with the Galaxy A17 5G is how laggy it is. It's important to note that this is our experience with the 4GB variant. It's possible that the 6GB version has it much better. The poor performance now also raises the question of how Samsung will be able to keep this phone up to date with newer software versions, which will likely be more demanding of the hardware.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/18/2025
Rating: Total score: 68%
Source: Computerbild
DE→zh-CNSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/05/2026
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Computerbild
DE→zh-CNComparison, online available, Short, Date: 12/15/2025
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Netzwelt
DE→zh-CNSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/28/2025
Rating: Total score: 82% performance: 68% display: 79% mobility: 68%
Source: PC Welt
DE→zh-CNSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/25/2025
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Computerbild
DE→zh-CNSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/22/2025
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Computerbild
DE→zh-CNSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/08/2025
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Tudo Celular
PT→zh-CNSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/08/2025
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 60%
Source: Smart World
IT→zh-CNSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/15/2025
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 60% features: 70% display: 75% mobility: 75% workmanship: 70% ergonomy: 70%
Source: Clubic
FR→zh-CNSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/27/2025
Rating: Total score: 70% performance: 40% display: 80% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: 01Net
FR→zh-CNSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/06/2025
Rating: Total score: 50% price: 50% display: 70% mobility: 50%
Source: Frandroid
FR→zh-CNSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 09/10/2025
Rating: Total score: 70% performance: 60% display: 70% mobility: 70% workmanship: 70%
Source: Les Numeriques
FR→zh-CNSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/06/2025
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 60% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80% ergonomy: 80%
Source: FPT shop
VN→zh-CNSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/13/2026
Source: FPT shop
VN→zh-CNComparison, online available, Short, Date: 12/31/2025
Source: Vat Vo Studio
VN→zh-CNComparison, online available, Medium, Date: 12/29/2025
Source: FPT shop
VN→zh-CNSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 12/09/2025
Source: The Gioididong
VN→zh-CNHands-On, online available, Medium, Date: 10/02/2025
Source: The Gioididong
VN→zh-CNSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/19/2025
Source: Vat Vo Studio
VN→zh-CNSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/16/2025
Source: FPT shop
VN→zh-CNSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/13/2025
Source: The Gioididong
VN→zh-CNSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/04/2025
Source: Vat Vo Studio
VN→zh-CNSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/30/2025
Source: Vat Vo Studio
VN→zh-CNComparison, online available, Medium, Date: 08/29/2025
Source: FPT shop
VN→zh-CNSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/28/2025
Source: VNReview
VN→zh-CNComparison, online available, Very Short, Date: 08/21/2025
Source: The Gioididong
VN→zh-CNHands-On, online available, Medium, Date: 08/20/2025
Source: XT Mobile
VN→zh-CNSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/15/2025
Comment
ARM Mali-G68 MP2:
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
Exynos 1330: 中端 SoC,效率集群采用六个 ARM Cortex-A55(最高 2 GHz),性能集群采用两个 ARM Cortex-A78(最高 2.4 GHz)。集成的 5G 调制解调器支持高达 2.55 Gbps 的下载速度。» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
Similar devices with the Same Specs
Devices with Same Screen Size and/or Weight
Devices from the same Manufacturer
