Notebookcheck Logo

Honor Magic6 Lite 评测：时尚 5G 智能手机，高端外观，经济实惠

在中程范围内提高效率是不可能的。 Honor Magic6 Lite 兼具中端手机的功能和高端设备的设计。在这篇关于 Magic 6 Lite 的评测中，您将看到Honor 手机的 120 Hz AMOLED 面板概念是否可行，是否值得购买。
5G Touchscreen Smartphone

Honor 的最新中档手机与其前代产品相似 前代但仍有许多改进--首先是采用了 高通骁龙 6 代 1取代了过时的 骁龙 695 5G 的 Magic5 Lite.此外，Magic6 Lite 还采用了全新的 108 MPix 摄像头和透光率更高的 f/1.75 镜头，以及 5300 mAh 大容量电池。

在定价方面，Honor 将其 Lite 机型归入中档，在欧洲的起价为 400 欧元。只有一种配置，8 GB 内存和 256 GB UFS 存储硬盘。利用内部的 Turbo 技术，内存可扩展至 8 GB。该技术通过使用 UFS 存储器的一部分来实现。但由于它比内存慢得多，因此只有在极少数情况下才会有好处。

Honor Magic6 Lite (Magic6 Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 8 x 1.8 - 2.2 GHz, Cortex-A78 / A55
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 710
Memory
8 GB 
Display
6.78 inch 19.9:9, 2652 x 1200 pixel 429 PPI, capacitive Touchscreen, AMOLED, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 256 GB 
, 223 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: acceleration sensor, gyroscope, compass, OTG, Miracast
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.1, 5G: N1/N3/N7/N8/N20/N28/N38 /N40/N41/N77/N78, 4G: B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B20 /B28/B32/B38/B40/B41, 3G: B1/B2/B5/B8, 2G:B2/B3/B5/B8, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7.98 x 163.6 x 75.5
Battery
5300 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 13
Camera
Primary Camera: 108 MPix (f/​1.75, Videos @2160p/​30fps) + 5 MPix (f/2.2, 110°, wide angle lens)+ 2 MPix (f/2.4, macro lens), camera2API: Level3
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix (f/​2.45, Videos @1080p/​30fps)
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: Onscreen, USB cable, Info material, MagicOS 7.2, 24 Months Warranty, Widevine L1, GPS (L1), BeiDou (B1), GLONASS (L1), Galileo (E1), SAR value: 0.83 kg/W (Body), 1.21 kg/W (Head), fanless
Weight
185 g
Price
400 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
83.9 %
02/2024
Honor Magic6 Lite
SD 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710		185 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.78"2652x1200
82 %
05/2023
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G
SD 695 5G, Adreno 619		175 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.67"2400x1080
86.8 %
09/2023
Xiaomi Poco F5
SD 7+ Gen 2, Adreno 725		181 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.67"2400x1080
85.8 %
01/2024
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
SD 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710		187 g256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.67"2712x1220
86 %
05/2023
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5		202 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.40"2340x1080
84.6 %
10/2023
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
Dimensity 7030, Mali-G610 MP3		170 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.55"2400x1080
Honor Magic6 Lite 的可用颜色
Honor Magic6 Lite 的可用颜色

尽管 Magic6 Lite 的电池容量很大，但仅 185 克的重量却相当轻。这款Honor 手机的屏占比高达 91%，看起来非常时尚和现代。比 Magic6 Lite 更小的边框在中端手机中是绝无仅有的。屏幕采用 Ultra Bounce 防跌落技术保护，增强了防跌落保护，提高了可靠性。最高 1.5 米的跌落，无论角度如何，都应该不成问题。Honor 没有透露这里使用的是哪种玻璃。

在背面，Magic6 Lite 采用了漂亮的表面处理：机身采用素食皮革或哑光塑料制成。在德国，有三种颜色可供选择：翡翠绿、午夜黑和日出橙（素食皮），其中橙色仅限Honor 在线商店销售。没有 IP 等级。

Magic6 Lite 外壳的做工不错，尽管没有我们希望的那么高级。我们的绿色测试样品没有廉价感，但玻璃后壳的手机在我们看来质量更高。机身部件之间的缝隙紧密而均匀。

Honor Magic6 Lite 智能手机
Honor Magic6 Lite 智能手机
Honor Magic6 Lite 智能手机
Honor Magic6 Lite 智能手机
Honor Magic6 Lite 智能手机
Honor Magic6 Lite 智能手机
Honor Magic6 Lite 智能手机
Honor Magic6 Lite 智能手机

尺寸比较

❌
163.6 mm 75.5 mm 7.98 mm 185 g161.6 mm 73.9 mm 7.9 mm 175 g161.2 mm 74.3 mm 8 mm 187 g161.11 mm 74.95 mm 7.9 mm 181 g159.6 mm 72 mm 7.8 mm 170 g158.2 mm 76.7 mm 8.2 mm 202 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

连接性 -Honor Magic6 Lite，带 USB 2.0

对于一款 400 欧元的手机来说，Magic6 Lite 的连接选项绰绰有余。Honor 还说这款手机支持蓝牙 5.1，这很奇怪，因为骁龙 6 代 1 支持蓝牙 5.2。

与高级设备不同的是，USB 2.0 标准速度较慢，也不支持串联图片输出。在我们使用 M.2 固态硬盘（三星 980 Pro）进行的拷贝测试中，USB 端口只能达到非常慢的 22 MB/s。

UFS 3.1 内存容量为 256 GB，用户可使用 223 GB。令人失望的是，没有 512 GB 版本。无法通过 microSD 卡扩展内存。

左侧
左侧
右侧（电源按钮、音量摇杆）
右侧（电源按钮、音量摇杆）
顶部
顶部
底部（扬声器、USB、麦克风、SIM 卡插槽）
底部（扬声器、USB、麦克风、SIM 卡插槽）

软件 -Honor 电话Android 13

该设备的操作系统是不太新鲜的Android 13，带有 2023 年 11 月的安全更新。 在操作系统之上，Honor 采用了 Magic UI 7.2。计划升级到Android 14 及其前身，但没有更多。安全更新保证期为三年。这使Honor 落后于三星，因为韩国巨头更新了其 Galaxy A54 5G另一款中档手机 A54 5G 的更新期限为五年。

Honor Magic6 Lite 智能手机
Honor Magic6 Lite 智能手机
Honor Magic6 Lite 智能手机
Honor Magic6 Lite 智能手机

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 配备 5G 的 Magic6 Lite

Magic6 Lite 仅支持 WiFi 5--遗憾的是，在这方面，Honor 中端产品仍处于停滞状态。使用我们的参考路由器华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000，在 5 GHz 网络中的传输速率限制在 350 MBit/s，对于这种定价的手机来说并不算高。至少，无论接收还是发送数据，WiFi 性能都是一致的。

在移动数据方面，支持的频率有限。只有 13 个 LTE 频段可用--在这种情况下，覆盖了德国最重要的 4G 频段，而且还支持 5G。

Networking
Honor Magic6 Lite
iperf3 receive AXE11000
340 (min: 173) MBit/s ∼40%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
316 (min: 278) MBit/s ∼42%
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G
iperf3 receive AXE11000
357 (min: 172) MBit/s ∼42%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
369 (min: 337) MBit/s ∼49%
Xiaomi Poco F5
iperf3 receive AXE11000
686 (min: 509) MBit/s ∼81%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
662 (min: 93) MBit/s ∼88%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1694 (min: 1558) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1484 (min: 1288) MBit/s ∼100%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
iperf3 receive AXE11000
581 (min: 491) MBit/s ∼69%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
678 (min: 544) MBit/s ∼90%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
iperf3 receive AXE11000
843 (min: 813) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
750 (min: 546) MBit/s ∼100%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
878 (min: 686) MBit/s ∼52%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
668 (min: 436) MBit/s ∼45%
Average of class Smartphone
iperf3 receive AXE11000
646 (min: 34.8) MBit/s ∼77%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
685 (min: 40.5) MBit/s ∼91%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1536 (min: 229) MBit/s ∼91%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1364 (min: 598) MBit/s ∼92%
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340360Tooltip
Honor Magic6 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 710; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø334 (173-349)
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 619; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø351 (172-378)
Honor Magic6 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 710; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø316 (278-344)
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 619; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø369 (337-380)
户外地理定位
户外地理定位
内部地理定位
内部地理定位

Magic6 Lite 支持大多数全球卫星网络，但只支持单频段。在中档手机中，像这样的妥协比比皆是，而对于Honor 手机来说，地理位置定位还是很精确的。

在骑车途中，我们将其地理定位功能与 Garmin Venu 2 进行了比较。总体距离只少了 10 米，但在道路路线方面有一些小的规律性。Garmin 手表更加精确，但Honor 中端手机的导航功能仍然非常实用。

Honor Magic6 Lite 与 Garmin Venu 2 的对比
Honor Magic6 Lite 与 Garmin Venu 2 的对比

电话功能和语音质量 -Honor Magic6 Lite，双卡双待

Honor Magic6 Lite 智能手机
Honor Magic6 Lite 智能手机

Magic6 Lite 的语音捕捉质量很好，能很好地过滤背景噪音。这是一款双卡双待手机，可容纳两张实体 nanoSIM 卡，不支持 eSIM。但支持 VoLTE 和 WiFi 通话等功能。

摄像头 -Honor 智能手机，10800 万像素

与Honor Magic6 Lite 自拍
与Honor Magic6 Lite 自拍

主摄像头与 Magic5 Lite但自拍摄像头保持不变：1600 万像素摄像头采用 f/2.45 快门，位于中央孔位。自拍效果更加平滑，但质量与我们对这个价位的预期基本一致。

新的主摄像头采用 1/1.67 英寸规格的 10800 万像素传感器和 f/1.75 大快门，可获得比前代产品更好的照片。尽管如此，弱光拍摄并不是 Magic6 Lite 的强项，因为我们希望光线能更好，而且暗处的照片缺乏细节。没有光学防抖（OIS）功能。

0,6x
0,6x
1x
1x
2x
2x
3x
3x
8 倍（最大值）
8 倍（最大值）
Makro
Makro

在日光下，108 万像素的摄像头效果更好，图像清晰，但即使在这种情况下，画面也会变暗，削弱 Magic6 Lite 的图像效果。

Magic6 Lite 没有光学变焦功能。由于 108 MPix 摄像头的分辨率很高，因此可以使用高达 3 倍的数码变焦。当然，传感器的裁剪还是会损失一些清晰度和细节。为了获得更好的效果，三星 ISOCELL HM6 的小原生像素在变焦时需要更多的光线。


Honor Magic6 Lite 智能手机
Honor Magic6 Lite 智能手机
Honor Magic6 Lite 智能手机
Honor Magic6 Lite 智能手机

500 万像素 110 度超广角摄像头和 200 万像素 4 厘米对焦长度的微距传感器在规格表上看起来不错，但实际拍摄效果并不出色。

在视频方面，Magic6 Lite 以 30 FPS 的 UHD 画质拍摄视频。自拍镜头的视频上限为 FHD@30 FPS。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

WeitwinkelWeitwinkelLow LightZoom 5xUltraweitwinkel

在受控环境下，Honor 手机的色彩准确度相当高。蓝色的具体亮度有所提高，deltaE 也相当高。白色的显示效果也不理想。

ColorChecker
12.5 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
15.6 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
18 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
11.7 ∆E
19.4 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
2.8 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
1.7 ∆E
ColorChecker Honor Magic6 Lite: 9.18 ∆E min: 1.71 - max: 19.35 ∆E
ColorChecker
29.4 ∆E
55 ∆E
39.6 ∆E
36.3 ∆E
45.1 ∆E
63.7 ∆E
54.2 ∆E
35.7 ∆E
43.8 ∆E
28 ∆E
66.2 ∆E
64.7 ∆E
31.1 ∆E
48.6 ∆E
37.6 ∆E
77.1 ∆E
44 ∆E
44.1 ∆E
94.3 ∆E
71.4 ∆E
52.5 ∆E
37 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Honor Magic6 Lite: 47.37 ∆E min: 13.46 - max: 94.34 ∆E

配件和保修 - Magic6 Lite 不含充电器

Honor Magic 6 Lite 的超级充电电源适配器
Honor Magic 6 Lite 的超级充电电源适配器

作为一款中档手机，Magic6 Lite 附带的配件非常简陋。包装盒内只有一根 USB 2.0 数据线、一个 SIM 卡工具和一些信息资料。如果随手机一起订购，还可选配超级充电电源适配器（单机售价 30 欧元），只需额外支付 1 欧元。还可免费加装屏幕保护膜（否则价格为 26 欧元）。

德国保修两年。

输入设备和操作 -Honor Magic6 Lite，带面部解锁功能

Magic6 Lite 的电容式触摸屏非常流畅，最多可同时精确转换 10 根手指的输入。出厂时，屏幕上贴有屏幕保护膜，感觉质量不高。在 120 Hz 的面板上，动画和滚动都很流畅，但有时会有一些轻微的卡顿。

一个小型触觉电机可处理振动。不过并不十分精确，只有嗡嗡的效果。

为了快速解锁，用户可以选择不安全的二维面部解锁（虽然速度很快，但只能在光线良好的情况下使用）或指纹传感器。OLED 面板下方的光学传感器虽然可以更快地解锁，但运行起来并不完美。

Honor Magic6 Lite 智能手机
Honor Magic6 Lite 智能手机
Honor Magic6 Lite 智能手机

屏幕 -Honor OLED 智能手机

OLED 面板采用 RGGB 子像素矩阵，包含一个红色、一个蓝色和两个绿色二极管。
OLED 面板采用 RGGB 子像素矩阵，包含一个红色、一个蓝色和两个绿色二极管。

Magic6 Lite 配备了一块 6.78 英寸的曲面 AMOLED 屏幕，分辨率为 1200p，DPI 高达 429。刷新率不像 LTPO 面板那样是动态的，它只能在两个级别（60 Hz 和 120 Hz）之间自动切换。

Honor 手机支持 HDR 标准 HGL、HDR10 和杜比视界。此外，它还拥有多项护眼技术，包括低蓝光模式和 1920 Hz 调光。我们确实用示波器测得 PWM 为 528 Hz，但我们用闪烁计测量的结果是更高的值（1,920 Hz）。这最大限度地减少了 PWM 的负面影响，如头痛，因为它减少了人眼可见的闪烁。

Magic6 Lite 的亮度比前代产品提高了 前代产品亮度达到 1,032 cd/m²，屏幕全白，并启用了光线传感器。在 HDR 和 APL18 内容下，我们只能将亮度提高到 1,050 cd/m²，看不到 OLED 在 HDR 模式下的典型改进。

991
cd/m²		999
cd/m²		1019
cd/m²
993
cd/m²		1003
cd/m²		1032
cd/m²
994
cd/m²		1002
cd/m²		1029
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 1032 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1006.9 cd/m² Minimum: 2.56 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 96 %
Center on Battery: 1003 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 0.9 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
96.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.18
Honor Magic6 Lite
AMOLED, 2652x1200, 6.78		Honor Magic5 Lite 5G
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.67		Xiaomi Poco F5
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.67		Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
AMOLED, 2712x1220, 6.67		Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.40		Motorola Edge 40 Neo
pOLED, 2400x1080, 6.55
Screen
-34%
-65%
-51%
-65%
-67%
Brightness middle
1003
846
-16%
1034
3%
1205
20%
940
-6%
966
-4%
Brightness
1007
853
-15%
1033
3%
1177
17%
935
-7%
957
-5%
Brightness Distribution
96
88
-8%
93
-3%
90
-6%
99
3%
97
1%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
0.8
1.3
-63%
1.9
-138%
1.51
-89%
2.4
-200%
1.87
-134%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
2.4
2.7
-13%
3.7
-54%
4.07
-70%
3.2
-33%
4.34
-81%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
0.9
1.7
-89%
2.7
-200%
2.5
-178%
2.2
-144%
2.5
-178%
Gamma
2.18 101%
2.19 100%
2.24 98%
2.175 101%
2.05 107%
2.272 97%
CCT
6406 101%
6570 99%
6917 94%
6407 101%
6422 101%
6582 99%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 528 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 528 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 528 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17908 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

最小化显示
分钟
25 % 显示功能
25 %
50 % 显示功能
50 %
75 % 显示功能
75 %
最大程度的手动显示功能
100 %

不同亮度值下的固定变焦测量

在设置中选择色彩模式 "正常"，色温为 "标准 "时，色彩准确度最高。使用 X-Rite i1 Pro 3 光谱仪和 CalMan 测量 sRGB 色域的色彩偏差非常小。肉眼无法看到与参考色之间的差异。

色彩精确度（配置文件：正常、标准，目标：sRGB）
色彩精确度（配置文件：正常、标准，目标：sRGB）
色域（配置文件：正常、标准，目标：sRGB）
色域（配置文件：正常、标准，目标：sRGB）
灰度（配置文件：正常，标准，目标：sRGB）
灰度（配置文件：正常，标准，目标：sRGB）
饱和度（配置文件：正常，标准，目标：sRGB）
饱和度（配置文件：正常，标准，目标：sRGB）

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
1.48 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.773 ms rise
↘ 0.7035 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.89 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.9635 ms rise
↘ 0.9255 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

在户外，Magic6 Lite 的高亮度屏幕给我们留下了深刻印象。不过需要注意的是，最大亮度仅在使用光线传感器时可用。手动调节亮度时，最大亮度为 606 cd/m²。

视角稳定性非常好，即使在极端视角下，亮度损失也很小。色彩不会改变。

性能 -Honor Magic6 Lite 与高通公司-SoC

尽管 骁龙 6 代 1是一款相当新的芯片组（2022 年发布，4 纳米节点），但 Magic6 Lite 的性能在 400 欧元级别中并不出众。特别是在 Geekbench 单核测试中，与竞争对手相比，Cortex A78 的表现相当一般。A Poco F5配备了 骁龙 7+ 2 代包括 Cortex X2 内核的 Poco F5 比Honor 手机快 50%。

但即使在系统基准测试（如 Antutu）中，Magic6 Lite 也很难与之匹敌。如果不使用出厂时未启用的性能模式，性能潜力就会被浪费。

Geekbench 5.5 | Geekbench 6.2 | Antutu v9 | Antutu v10 | PCMark for Android | CrossMark | BaseMark OS II | UL Procyon AI Inference for Android | AImark
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Xiaomi Poco F5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2, Adreno 725, 8192
1225 Points +67%
Average of class Smartphone
  (119 - 2138, n=220, last 2 years)
911 Points +24%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
MediaTek Dimensity 7030, Mali-G610 MP3, 12288
789 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192
783 Points +7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
783 Points +7%
Honor Magic6 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192
735 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1
  (725 - 735, n=2)
730 Points -1%
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
666 Points -9%
Multi-Core
Xiaomi Poco F5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2, Adreno 725, 8192
3948 Points +44%
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 6681, n=220, last 2 years)
2988 Points +9%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192
2817 Points +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1
  (2736 - 2763, n=2)
2750 Points +1%
Honor Magic6 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192
2736 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
2678 Points -2%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
MediaTek Dimensity 7030, Mali-G610 MP3, 12288
2197 Points -20%
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1891 Points -31%
Geekbench 6.2
Single-Core
Xiaomi Poco F5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2, Adreno 725, 8192
1687 Points +79%
Average of class Smartphone
  (193 - 2930, n=105, last 2 years)
1390 Points +48%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
1029 Points +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1
  (940 - 944, n=2)
942 Points 0%
Honor Magic6 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192
940 Points
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
MediaTek Dimensity 7030, Mali-G610 MP3, 12288
893 Points -5%
Multi-Core
Xiaomi Poco F5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2, Adreno 725, 8192
4378 Points +58%
Average of class Smartphone
  (845 - 7408, n=105, last 2 years)
3840 Points +38%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
2955 Points +6%
Honor Magic6 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192
2776 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1
  (2773 - 2776, n=2)
2775 Points 0%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
MediaTek Dimensity 7030, Mali-G610 MP3, 12288
2214 Points -20%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Xiaomi Poco F5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2, Adreno 725, 8192
1115567 Points +247%
Average of class Smartphone
  (102602 - 1650926, n=153, last 2 years)
738503 Points +129%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
518499 Points +61%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
MediaTek Dimensity 7030, Mali-G610 MP3, 12288
510541 Points +59%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192
507481 Points +58%
Honor Magic6 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192
321827 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1
  ()
321827 Points 0%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (281399 - 2162423, n=51, last 2 years)
1249818 Points +148%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
566071 Points +12%
Honor Magic6 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192
504020 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1
  (490448 - 504020, n=2)
497234 Points -1%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
MediaTek Dimensity 7030, Mali-G610 MP3, 12288
15195 Points +21%
Xiaomi Poco F5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2, Adreno 725, 8192
14143 Points +12%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192
13024 Points +4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
12967 Points +3%
Honor Magic6 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192
12573 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1
  (11693 - 12573, n=2)
12133 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4761 - 21385, n=215, last 2 years)
11771 Points -6%
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
10071 Points -20%
CrossMark - Overall
Average of class Smartphone
  (200 - 1474, n=165, last 2 years)
837 Points
Xiaomi Poco F5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2, Adreno 725, 8192
817 Points
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
MediaTek Dimensity 7030, Mali-G610 MP3, 12288
713 Points
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192
703 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1
  ()
689 Points
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
597 Points
Honor Magic6 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192
Points
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average of class Smartphone
  (411 - 11438, n=166, last 2 years)
5759 Points +31%
Xiaomi Poco F5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2, Adreno 725, 8192
5089 Points +16%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
5056 Points +15%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192
4666 Points +6%
Honor Magic6 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192
4382 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1
  (4233 - 4382, n=2)
4308 Points -2%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
MediaTek Dimensity 7030, Mali-G610 MP3, 12288
4152 Points -5%
System
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
10410 Points +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1
  (9801 - 10083, n=2)
9942 Points +1%
Honor Magic6 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192
9801 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (2376 - 16475, n=166, last 2 years)
9672 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192
8961 Points -9%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
MediaTek Dimensity 7030, Mali-G610 MP3, 12288
7550 Points -23%
Xiaomi Poco F5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2, Adreno 725, 8192
7446 Points -24%
Memory
Average of class Smartphone
  (670 - 12716, n=166, last 2 years)
6267 Points +47%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
MediaTek Dimensity 7030, Mali-G610 MP3, 12288
5742 Points +35%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192
4857 Points +14%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
4595 Points +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1
  (4263 - 4837, n=2)
4550 Points +7%
Xiaomi Poco F5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2, Adreno 725, 8192
4374 Points +3%
Honor Magic6 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192
4263 Points
Graphics
Xiaomi Poco F5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2, Adreno 725, 8192
15847 Points +171%
Average of class Smartphone
  (697 - 58651, n=166, last 2 years)
14220 Points +144%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
7168 Points +23%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192
7108 Points +22%
Honor Magic6 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192
5837 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1
  (5783 - 5837, n=2)
5810 Points 0%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
MediaTek Dimensity 7030, Mali-G610 MP3, 12288
5178 Points -11%
Web
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
1905 Points +33%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192
1533 Points +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10 - 2145, n=166, last 2 years)
1495 Points +4%
Honor Magic6 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192
1432 Points
Xiaomi Poco F5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2, Adreno 725, 8192
1384 Points -3%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
MediaTek Dimensity 7030, Mali-G610 MP3, 12288
1324 Points -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1
  (1192 - 1432, n=2)
1312 Points -8%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
MediaTek Dimensity 7030, Mali-G610 MP3, 12288
22528 Points +194%
Average of class Smartphone
  (207 - 84787, n=150, last 2 years)
21814 Points +185%
Xiaomi Poco F5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2, Adreno 725, 8192
10511 Points +37%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
8618 Points +13%
Honor Magic6 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192
7651 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1
  (7236 - 7651, n=2)
7444 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192
5835 Points -24%
AImark - Score v3.x
Average of class Smartphone
  (298 - 245629, n=105, last 2 years)
17833 Points +2928%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
MediaTek Dimensity 7030, Mali-G610 MP3, 12288
8006 Points +1259%
Xiaomi Poco F5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2, Adreno 725, 8192
1189 Points +102%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
691 Points +17%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192
622 Points +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1
  (589 - 644, n=2)
617 Points +5%
Honor Magic6 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192
589 Points

GPU 内核为 Adreno 710也用于 骁龙 7s 第二代的 Redmi Note 13 Pro.不过，Magic6 Lite 的性能并没有达到小米手机的水平。尤其是在要求更高的阿兹台克遗址测试中，竞争对手的速度比 Magic6 Lite 更快。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Wild Life Score | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Xiaomi Poco F5
Adreno 725, SD 7+ Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1968 Points +216%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
799 Points +28%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
788 Points +26%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
Mali-G610 MP3, Dimensity 7030, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
693 Points +11%
Honor Magic6 Lite
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
623 Points
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
352 Points -43%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Xiaomi Poco F5
Adreno 725, SD 7+ Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1984 Points +223%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
813 Points +32%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
800 Points +30%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
Mali-G610 MP3, Dimensity 7030, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
698 Points +13%
Honor Magic6 Lite
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
615 Points
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
360 Points -41%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Xiaomi Poco F5
Adreno 725, SD 7+ Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7701 Points +233%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3046 Points +32%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2853 Points +23%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
Mali-G610 MP3, Dimensity 7030, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2583 Points +12%
Honor Magic6 Lite
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2311 Points
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1199 Points -48%
3DMark / Wild Life Score
Xiaomi Poco F5
Adreno 725, SD 7+ Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7684 Points +225%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3039 Points +28%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2826 Points +19%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
Mali-G610 MP3, Dimensity 7030, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2593 Points +10%
Honor Magic6 Lite
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2367 Points
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1209 Points -49%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2998 Points +21%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2771 Points +11%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
Mali-G610 MP3, Dimensity 7030, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2711 Points +9%
Honor Magic6 Lite
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2487 Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4915 Points +23%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4914 Points +23%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
Mali-G610 MP3, Dimensity 7030, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4272 Points +7%
Honor Magic6 Lite
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3982 Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4303 Points +23%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4194 Points +20%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
Mali-G610 MP3, Dimensity 7030, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3787 Points +9%
Honor Magic6 Lite
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3487 Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi Poco F5
Adreno 725, SD 7+ Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4985 Points +14%
Honor Magic6 Lite
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4375 Points
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4227 Points -3%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
Mali-G610 MP3, Dimensity 7030, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4053 Points -7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3852 Points -12%
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3537 Points -19%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Xiaomi Poco F5
Adreno 725, SD 7+ Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
14801 Points +242%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5455 Points +26%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5129 Points +19%
Honor Magic6 Lite
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4323 Points
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
Mali-G610 MP3, Dimensity 7030, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4258 Points -2%
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3001 Points -31%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Xiaomi Poco F5
Adreno 725, SD 7+ Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10274 Points +136%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4993 Points +15%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4897 Points +12%
Honor Magic6 Lite
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4356 Points
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
Mali-G610 MP3, Dimensity 7030, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4211 Points -3%
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3106 Points -29%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco F5
Adreno 725, SD 7+ Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps +52%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
Mali-G610 MP3, Dimensity 7030, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
96 fps +22%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
94 fps +19%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
90 fps +14%
Honor Magic6 Lite
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
79 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco F5
Adreno 725, SD 7+ Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
359 fps +236%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
120 fps +12%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
119 fps +11%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
Mali-G610 MP3, Dimensity 7030, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
117 fps +9%
Honor Magic6 Lite
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
107 fps
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi Poco F5
Adreno 725, SD 7+ Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps +159%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
69 fps +50%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
Mali-G610 MP3, Dimensity 7030, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
65 fps +41%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
52 fps +13%
Honor Magic6 Lite
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
46 fps
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco F5
Adreno 725, SD 7+ Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
232 fps +263%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
80 fps +25%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
Mali-G610 MP3, Dimensity 7030, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
71 fps +11%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
69 fps +8%
Honor Magic6 Lite
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
64 fps
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco F5
Adreno 725, SD 7+ Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
115 fps +271%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
54 fps +74%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
47 fps +52%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
Mali-G610 MP3, Dimensity 7030, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
42 fps +35%
Honor Magic6 Lite
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
31 fps
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco F5
Adreno 725, SD 7+ Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
137 fps +204%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
52 fps +16%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
Mali-G610 MP3, Dimensity 7030, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
49 fps +9%
Honor Magic6 Lite
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
45 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
32 fps -29%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco F5
Adreno 725, SD 7+ Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
68 fps +325%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
26 fps +63%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
Mali-G610 MP3, Dimensity 7030, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
22 fps +38%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
19 fps +19%
Honor Magic6 Lite
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
16 fps
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco F5
Adreno 725, SD 7+ Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
79 fps +229%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
31 fps +29%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
29 fps +21%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
Mali-G610 MP3, Dimensity 7030, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
26 fps +8%
Honor Magic6 Lite
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
24 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco F5
Adreno 725, SD 7+ Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
49 fps +308%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
20 fps +67%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
Mali-G610 MP3, Dimensity 7030, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
18 fps +50%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
15 fps +25%
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
12 fps 0%
Honor Magic6 Lite
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
12 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco F5
Adreno 725, SD 7+ Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
34 fps +209%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
13 fps +18%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
13 fps +18%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
Mali-G610 MP3, Dimensity 7030, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
12 fps +9%
Honor Magic6 Lite
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
11 fps
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
8.2 fps -25%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco F5
Adreno 725, SD 7+ Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
81 fps +710%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
30 fps +200%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
Mali-G610 MP3, Dimensity 7030, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
28 fps +180%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
23 fps +130%
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
19 fps +90%
Honor Magic6 Lite
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco F5
Adreno 725, SD 7+ Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
35 fps +75%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
35 fps +75%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
34 fps +70%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
Mali-G610 MP3, Dimensity 7030, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
32 fps +60%
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
22 fps +10%
Honor Magic6 Lite
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
20 fps
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco F5
Adreno 725, SD 7+ Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
16 fps +240%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.9 fps +26%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.8 fps +23%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
Mali-G610 MP3, Dimensity 7030, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5.3 fps +13%
Honor Magic6 Lite
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4.7 fps
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3.6 fps -23%

在浏览器基准测试中，Magic6 Lite 的 CPU/GPU 测试结果比预期的要差。这也反映在日常性能上。浏览速度稳居中端水平，但经常出现小的卡顿，加载网页有时也很费时间。

Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | WebXPRT 4 | WebXPRT 3 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Poco F5 (Chrome 116)
126.392 Points +63%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G (Chrome 120)
117.292 Points +51%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 351, n=173, last 2 years)
106.1 Points +37%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo (Chrome 118)
102.38 Points +32%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G (Chrome 112)
94.611 Points +22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (77.6 - 88.2, n=2)
82.9 Points +7%
Honor Magic6 Lite (Chrome 121)
77.564 Points
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Xiaomi Poco F5 (Chrome 116)
108 runs/min +73%
Average of class Smartphone (14.9 - 445, n=157, last 2 years)
107.1 runs/min +71%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo (Chrome 118)
91.6 runs/min +47%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G (Chrome 120)
88.2 runs/min +41%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (62.5 - 86.6, n=2)
74.6 runs/min +19%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G (Chrome 112)
70.5 runs/min +13%
Honor Magic6 Lite (Chrome 121)
62.5 runs/min
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G (Chrome 120)
115 Points +51%
Xiaomi Poco F5 (Chrome 116)
107 Points +41%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo (Chrome 118)
106 Points +39%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 202, n=160, last 2 years)
100.2 Points +32%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G (Chrome 112)
97 Points +28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (76 - 95, n=2)
85.5 Points +13%
Honor Magic6 Lite (Chrome 121)
76 Points
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Xiaomi Poco F5 (Chrome 116)
134 Points +17%
Average of class Smartphone (39 - 304, n=122, last 2 years)
133.1 Points +16%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G (Chrome 112)
124 Points +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (115 - 132, n=2)
123.5 Points +7%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo (Chrome 118)
121 Points +5%
Honor Magic6 Lite (Chrome 121)
115 Points
Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Poco F5 (Chrome 116)
37823 Points +54%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G (Chrome 120)
35379 Points +44%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo (Chrome 118)
34140 Points +39%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G (Chrome 112)
33801 Points +37%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 89112, n=214, last 2 years)
33357 Points +36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (24583 - 32436, n=2)
28510 Points +16%
Honor Magic6 Lite (Chrome 121)
24583 Points
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G (Chrome 112)
22847 Points -7%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Honor Magic6 Lite (Chrome 121)
1786.4 ms *
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=173, last 2 years)
1595 ms * +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (1321 - 1786, n=2)
1554 ms * +13%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo (Chrome 118)
1299.1 ms * +27%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G (Chrome 112)
1208.8 ms * +32%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G (Chrome 120)
1170.6 ms * +34%
Xiaomi Poco F5 (Chrome 116)
1021.2 ms * +43%

* ... smaller is better

在速度方面，Honor 手机的内部存储器性能良好，尤其是与 UFS 2.2 竞争对手（如 Redmi Note 13 Pro.不过，与其他 UFS 3.1 机型相比，Magic6 Lite 的速度并不慢，这可能是由于采用了 骁龙 SoC.

Honor Magic6 LiteHonor Magic5 Lite 5GXiaomi Poco F5Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5GSamsung Galaxy A54 5GMotorola Edge 40 NeoAverage 256 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-48%
66%
-16%
-50%
-1%
18%
6%
Sequential Read 256KB
1827.3
486.17
-73%
1798.37
-2%
946.8
-48%
528.32
-71%
1004.4
-45%
1759 ?(1004 - 2037, n=88)
-4%
1506 ?(226 - 4512, n=219, last 2 years)
-18%
Sequential Write 256KB
843.34
420.44
-50%
1736.41
106%
808.2
-4%
335.39
-60%
930.9
10%
1130 ?(452 - 1873, n=88)
34%
1115 ?(57.5 - 3678, n=219, last 2 years)
32%
Random Read 4KB
223.75
171.13
-24%
389.37
74%
239.2
7%
236.23
6%
279.5
25%
282 ?(173.5 - 543, n=88)
26%
247 ?(22.2 - 543, n=219, last 2 years)
10%
Random Write 4KB
271.22
149.12
-45%
498.93
84%
220.5
-19%
70.52
-74%
284.1
5%
309 ?(132.1 - 499, n=89)
14%
271 ?(13 - 709, n=219, last 2 years)
0%

游戏 - Magic6 Lite 管理 60 fps

经过 GPU 基准测试 Adreno 710和 8GB RAM 的支持下，Magic6 Lite 是否能胜任高要求和高帧率游戏。我们使用GameBench 进行测量。.

作为第一款游戏，我们测试了 GPU 密集型幻想动作 RPG《源氏冲击》。游戏设置为高分辨率，帧数下降大大降低了游戏的乐趣。总体而言，平均帧数为 29.5FPS。在降低图形性能的情况下，我们的平均帧数达到了 49 FPS，看起来非常流畅。但我们并没有达到可能的 60 FPS。

即使是要求较低的游戏，如《死亡扳机 2》，也无法完全利用 OLED 面板的 120 Hz 频率。我们测得的帧速率为 60 FPS。

以 UHD 分辨率显示高细节的《PUBG Mobile》的 FPS 一直保持在 40 FPS。如果我们降低设置（HD），GPU 单元可达到 60 FPS。90 FPS 设置不可用。

源泉冲击
源泉冲击
死亡扳机 2
死亡扳机 2
PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Honor Magic6 Lite; Dead Trigger 2: Ø59.8 (58-60)
Honor Magic6 Lite; Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps: Ø48.6 (19-60)
Honor Magic6 Lite; Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps: Ø29.5 (26-35)
Honor Magic6 Lite; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø59.6 (57-60)
Honor Magic6 Lite; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø59.1 (48-60)
Honor Magic6 Lite; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD: Ø39.6 (36-41)

排放 -Honor Magic6 Lite 几乎没有节流现象

温度

空转时表面温度较低。持续负载时，最高温度会升至 43 摄氏度。为了测量内部发热量，我们使用了 3DMark 压力测试。在此测试中，高通 SoC 在计算密集型场景下几乎没有出现节流现象。对于Honor 手机来说，日常使用中的负载节流是意料之中的。

Max. Load
 42.8 °C41 °C36.6 °C 
 42.9 °C42.7 °C37.6 °C 
 42.2 °C41.5 °C36.8 °C 
Maximum: 42.9 °C
Average: 40.5 °C
36.5 °C39.3 °C40.9 °C
37.6 °C38.3 °C39.2 °C
34.4 °C38.5 °C39.3 °C
Maximum: 40.9 °C
Average: 38.2 °C
Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40.5 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.9 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.9 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.2 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.8 % 0%
Honor Magic6 Lite
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.7 %
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.4 % 0%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
Mali-G610 MP3, Dimensity 7030, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.3 % 0%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
98.8 % -1%
Xiaomi Poco F5
Adreno 725, SD 7+ Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
85.8 % -14%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Xiaomi Poco F5
Adreno 725, SD 7+ Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.7 % +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.7 % +1%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.5 % 0%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
Mali-G610 MP3, Dimensity 7030, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.4 % 0%
Honor Magic6 Lite
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.2 %
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
98.7 % -1%
051015202530354045Tooltip
Honor Magic6 Lite Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø3.68 (3.67-3.69)
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø2.15 (2.14-2.17)
Xiaomi Poco F5 Adreno 725, SD 7+ Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø11.7 (11.7-11.8)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø4.75 (4.74-4.76)
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø4.85 (4.84-4.87)
Motorola Edge 40 Neo Mali-G610 MP3, Dimensity 7030, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø4.17 (4.16-4.18)
Honor Magic6 Lite Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø14.3 (14.3-14.3)
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 1.1.0.2: Ø7.21 (7.2-7.21)
Xiaomi Poco F5 Adreno 725, SD 7+ Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø40.9 (39.1-45.6)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø18.1 (18.1-18.2)
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø16.9 (16.8-17)
Motorola Edge 40 Neo Mali-G610 MP3, Dimensity 7030, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø15.4 (15.4-15.5)
Xiaomi Poco F5 Adreno 725, SD 7+ Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø44.7 (39.7-46.1)
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø17 (17-17.1)

发言人

Magic6 Lite 只有一个单声道扬声器，但却能播放出非常响亮的声音。虽然高音很线性，但频谱的中段却不一致。低频几乎没有，底气不足。

耳机和耳塞可通过蓝牙 5.1 或 USB C 端口连接。Magic6 Lite 不支持音频编解码器。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2028.635.72525.9313123.429.84027.332.55036.238.46325.432.48016.633.810016.934.312514.735.616013.136.820015.139.125014.344.731511.650.740010575009.164.663011.166.98009.173.3100011.878.212501577160011.377.420001276.2250012.380.5315012.783.2400012.678.6500013.179.7630013.476800013.575.41000013.575.21250013.672.31600013.658.7SPL24.790.2N0.678.5median 13.1median 75.2Delta1.312.230.737.520.825.91933.317.132.433.439.420.931.416.635.620.533.416.533.914.738.81446.114.352.213.15213.660.413.265.412.366.712.568.711.971.812.672.812.973.813.37412.574.113.480.313.985.813.982.513.576.713.778.213.975.113.56613.757.225.390.70.776.6median 13.5median 71.80.710.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHonor Magic6 LiteHonor Magic5 Lite 5G
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Honor Magic6 Lite audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 34.9% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.9% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 27% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 48% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Honor Magic5 Lite 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.1% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 29% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 50% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池续航时间 -Honor 手机，电池电量充足

耗电量

电池容量比上一代 相比Magic6 Lite 的电池容量为 5,300 mAh，可通过 USB 端口以最高 35 W 的功率充电。使用合适的电源（Powerbank，PD 3.0，最大功率 100 W），Magic6 Lite 的电池可在 2.5 小时内充满。Honor 宣传电池的使用寿命很长，据说经过 1,000 次充电后仍可提供 80% 的原始容量。

尽管有烧毁基准，但负载下的功耗很低。其他智能手机，如 Poco F5等智能手机在此方面的表现更差。不过，在闲置状态下，Honor 手机的功耗相当高，超过 2 W。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.32 / 0.25 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.93 / 2.26 / 2.31 Watt
Load midlight 7.87 / 8.55 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Honor Magic6 Lite
5300 mAh		Xiaomi Poco F5
5000 mAh		Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
5100 mAh		Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
5000 mAh		Motorola Edge 40 Neo
5000 mAh		Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1
 		Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
3%
18%
23%
22%
-68%
20%
Idle Minimum *
0.93
0.89
4%
1.3
-40%
0.75
19%
1
-8%
1.215 ?(0.93 - 1.5, n=2)
-31%
0.897 ?(0.42 - 2.37, n=162, last 2 years)
4%
Idle Average *
2.26
1.05
54%
1.4
38%
1.51
33%
1.2
47%
5.33 ?(2.26 - 8.39, n=2)
-136%
1.452 ?(0.69 - 4.26, n=162, last 2 years)
36%
Idle Maximum *
2.31
1.08
53%
1.6
31%
1.62
30%
1.3
44%
5.39 ?(2.31 - 8.46, n=2)
-133%
1.629 ?(0.79 - 4.45, n=162, last 2 years)
29%
Load Average *
7.87
10.86
-38%
2.5
68%
4.91
38%
5.2
34%
9.76 ?(7.87 - 11.7, n=2)
-24%
5.55 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=162, last 2 years)
29%
Load Maximum *
8.55
13.49
-58%
9.1
-6%
8.93
-4%
9.2
-8%
10.1 ?(8.55 - 11.7, n=2)
-18%
8.31 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=162, last 2 years)
3%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

0123456789Tooltip
Honor Magic6 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø3.65 (0.913-8.1)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø4.95 (1.383-9.14)
Honor Magic6 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.358 (1.236-1.999)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.607 (1.531-2.56)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

00.20.40.60.80.91.11.31.51.71.92.12.32.42.62.833.23.43.6Tooltip
Honor Magic6 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø3.43 (3.27-3.75)
Honor Magic6 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.358 (1.236-1.999)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.607 (1.531-2.56)

电池寿命

尽管 Magic6 Lite 的分辨率更高，但它的电池续航时间却非常出色，与 1080p 竞争产品相比很有竞争力。将亮度设为 150 cd/m²，可以对两款手机进行比较。在实际的 WiFi 测试中，Magic6 Lite 可以使用 15 个小时。在关闭 WiFi 模块并循环播放视频的情况下，我们测得的时间为 17 小时。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
30h 41min
WiFi Websurfing (chrome 121)
15h 06min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
16h 49min
Load (maximum brightness)
4h 49min
Honor Magic6 Lite
5300 mAh		Honor Magic5 Lite 5G
5100 mAh		Xiaomi Poco F5
5000 mAh		Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
5100 mAh		Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
5000 mAh		Motorola Edge 40 Neo
5000 mAh
Battery Runtime
-10%
4%
7%
23%
18%
Reader / Idle
1841
1324
-28%
1786
-3%
2591
41%
2444
33%
H.264
1009
1123
11%
1142
13%
1508
49%
1232
22%
WiFi v1.3
906
816
-10%
1014
12%
1002
11%
941
4%
864
-5%
Load
289
343
19%
307
6%
284
-2%
355
23%

Pros

+ 现代设计
+ 电池寿命长
+ 屏幕明亮，校准精确
+ 精确的地理位置
+ 性能稳定，无节流现象

Cons

- 只有 WiFi 5
- 无立体声扬声器
- 不保证更新
- 同价位产品性能较低
- USB 端口速度慢

Honor Magic6 Lite 的评价

回顾： Honor Magic6 Lite。评测设备由Honor 提供。
回顾： Honor Magic6 Lite。评测设备由Honor 提供。

Magic6 Lite 的 6.78 英寸大 AMOLED 面板没有大边框，其现代设计给人留下了深刻印象，尤其是屏幕边缘的锥形设计。屏幕明亮，校准准确。如果 1,000 cd/m² 的亮度还不够，那么 Redmi Note 13 Pro可能是一款有趣的中档替代产品，屏幕亮度更高。

Honor Magic6 Lite 的设计在视觉上很讨人喜欢，但由于注重外观，功能上就显得落后了。

对于 400 美元的智能手机来说，妥协总是在拐角处。对于 Magic6 Lite 来说，我们的味蕾需要太多的妥协。缺少 IP 认证或 USB 接口速度慢的问题在中档手机中随处可见，但这款Honor 手机的 WWAN 和 WiFi 5 频率有限以及缺少立体声音效却值得批评。此外 骁龙 6 代 1对于这个级别的手机来说并不强大。该机 Poco F5的性能要好得多。

Honor 提供三年更新--不错，但三星的 Galaxy A54 5G.凭借 OIS 以及 eSIM 和 microSD 支持，三星手机是 Magic6 Lite 的有趣替代品。

定价和可用性

Honor Magic6 Lite 在德国的售价为 400 欧元。

Honor Magic6 Lite - 02/01/2024 v7
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis
85%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
91%
Connectivity
49 / 70 → 69%
Weight
89%
Battery
90%
Display
94%
Games Performance
44 / 64 → 68%
Application Performance
77 / 86 → 90%
Temperature
88%
Noise
100%
Audio
77 / 90 → 86%
Camera
62%
Average
78%
84%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Transparency

The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > Honor Magic6 Lite 评测：时尚 5G 智能手机，高端外观，经济实惠
Marcus Herbrich, 2024-02- 5 (Update: 2024-02- 5)