Notebookcheck Logo

努比亚RedMagic 8 Pro评测--具有100%性能的游戏智能手机

权力机构。 努比亚RedMagic 8 Pro主要想通过大量的性能、新的设计、精心掩饰的UD摄像头和额外的传感器按键来吸引玩家。集成风扇应确保稳定的最高性能。你可以在测试中发现这种组合是否有效,以及这样一个小风扇能有多大的声音。
5G Android Gaming Smartphone Touchscreen
(图片: Daniel Schmidt)
Nubia RedMagic 8 Pro (RedMagic Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 8 x 2 - 3.2 GHz, Cortex-X3 / A715 / A710 / A510 (Kryo)
Graphics adapter
Memory
12 GB 
, LPDDR5x
Display
6.80 inch 20:9, 2480 x 1116 pixel 400 PPI, capacitive, Touch Sampling Rate up to 960 Hz, AMOLED, Corning Gorilla Glas 5, DC Dimming, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash, 256 GB 
, 244 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, Audio Connections: USB-C and 3.5 mm Audio Jack, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: G-sensor, Electronic Compass, Gyroscope, Proximity, Sensor hub, OTG
Networking
Wi-Fi 7 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.3, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (Band 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 19), LTE (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28a, 28b, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66), 5G-Sub6 (Band 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 66, 77, 78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 9.47 x 164.5 x 77
Battery
6000 mAh Lithium-Ion
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 13
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (Samsung GN5, 1/1.57", 82°, f/1.88) + 8 MPix (Ultra Wide, 120°, f/2.2) + 2 MPix (Macro, 78°, f2.4); 8k-Video, Camera2-API: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix (Under Display Camera (UDC), 1.12 µm, f/2.0)
Additional features
Speakers: Dual, Keyboard: Onscreen, 65W-Charger, USB-Cabel, SIM-Tool, Clear Case, RedMagic OS 6.0, 12 Months Warranty, SAR: -; GNSS: GPS (L1, L5), Glonass (L1), Galileo (E1, E5a), BeiDou (B1, B1c, B2a), DRM Widevine L1, 20000 RPM fan; Game Space Switch, 520 Hz Shoulder Trigger Buttons; customizable RGB Light, fanless
Weight
228 g, Power Supply: 129 g
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
85.9 %
02/2023
Nubia RedMagic 8 Pro
SD 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740
228 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.80"2480x1116
84.9 %
09/2022
Nubia RedMagic 7S Pro
SD 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730
235 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.80"2400x1080
89.5 %
01/2023
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro
SD 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730
239 g512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.78"2448x1080
85.7 %
06/2022
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro
SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730
220 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.67"2400x1080

外壳和功能 - RedMagic 8 Pro,增加了触摸元素

努比亚RedMagic 8 Pro的设计已经明确表明它是一款游戏智能手机。它有哑光和虚空两种颜色版本。后者有一个部分透明的背面,有一个发光的RGB LED风扇和更多的存储空间(16/512 GB),而我们的哑光审查样品有一个黑色的背面。在那里,RedMagic标志和其他元素可以用可定制的LED照明来照亮。

建造质量很好,并以紧密和均匀的缝隙而令人信服。显示屏与表面的比例为88%,也非常好,这主要是由于显示屏下面的摄像头(UDC)。右侧长条形的两个触摸面可以被配置为游戏的额外输入元素,与前代产品相比,其采样率(520赫兹)没有变化。

(图片: Daniel Schmidt)
(图片: Daniel Schmidt)
顶部:扬声器、麦克风、音频插孔 (图片: Daniel Schmidt)
左图:音量按钮,进气口(图片:Daniel Schmidt)。
右图:触摸传感器、出风口、电源按钮、麦克风、游戏空间开关、触摸传感器(图片:Daniel Schmidt)。
底部:扬声器、USB、麦克风、SIM卡插槽(图片:Daniel Schmidt)。

尺寸比较

173 mm 77 mm 10.3 mm 239 g166.27 mm 77.1 mm 9.98 mm 235 g164.5 mm 77 mm 9.47 mm 228 g163.9 mm 76.5 mm 9.5 mm 220 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

通信、软件和操作

RedMagic 8 Pro的移动连接在测试中并不显眼,可以依靠广泛的频段支持。握在耳边时,语音质量很好,但对环境噪音的抑制不应有太多期待。通过Wi-Fi 7,这款智能手机支持最现代的WLAN标准,并且在连接速度测试中也显示出强大的改进。在6GHz网络中的传输率非常好,但在2.4和5.0GHz网络中只支持VHT80。

RedMagic智能手机搭载了谷歌Android 13和RedMagic OS 6.0界面。在测试时,安全补丁是在2022年11月1日,因此不再是最新的。目前还没有关于制造商提供的更新持续时间或间隔的具体声明。然而,经验表明,至少有一次重大的升级是可以预期的。

生物识别安全是由集成在显示屏上的光学指纹传感器提供的,它的工作令人满意,甚至可以测量脉搏。另外,也可以通过前置摄像头使用不太安全的面部识别。除了两个额外的电容式肩部按钮,边框上还有一个突出的红色按钮,可以将智能手机切换到一个特殊的游戏界面。个人游戏的设置可以在这里进行,RGB灯光也可以配置。

Networking
Nubia RedMagic 8 Pro
Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
887 (min: 446) MBit/s ∼55%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
734 (min: 569) MBit/s ∼47%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1838 (min: 928) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1840 (min: 1760) MBit/s ∼100%
Nubia RedMagic 7S Pro
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
687 (min: 313) MBit/s ∼43%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
796 (min: 697) MBit/s ∼51%
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro
Wi-Fi 6E
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1616 (min: 1469) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1553 (min: 1451) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1730 (min: 1564) MBit/s ∼94%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1617 (min: 1593) MBit/s ∼88%
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
853 (min: 785) MBit/s ∼46%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
943 (min: 893) MBit/s ∼51%
095190285380475570665760855950104511401235133014251520161517101805Tooltip
Nubia RedMagic 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1807 (928-1873)
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1730 (1564-1806)
Nubia RedMagic 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1833 (1760-1865)
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1616 (1593-1641)
Nubia RedMagic 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø732 (569-935)
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1551 (1451-1625)
Nubia RedMagic 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø872 (446-958)
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1616 (1469-1714)

摄像机 - RedMagic 8 Pro中的UDC伪装得很好

与RedMagic 8 Pro自拍
与RedMagic 8 Pro自拍

努比亚RedMagic 8 Pro的前置摄像头并不位于显示屏内,而是在其下方。这又是一个所谓的屏下摄像头(UDC),几乎看不到。照片不一定有丰富的细节或色彩亮度,但UDC绝对是同类产品中更好的一个。视频最好以全高清(30FPS)记录。

背面的三摄像头可以依靠一个额外的超广角和一个微距镜头。然而,它们的质量是相当平庸的。另一方面,5000万像素的主摄像头在日光下拍摄的照片很好,色彩还原相对自然。它甚至可以录制8K的视频。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main cameraMain cameraUltra wide-angle5x ZoomLow-Light
ColorChecker
7.3 ∆E
6 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
9 ∆E
2.4 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
1.4 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
2.2 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Nubia RedMagic 8 Pro: 6.01 ∆E min: 1.41 - max: 10.19 ∆E
ColorChecker
28.6 ∆E
50.6 ∆E
37.9 ∆E
33.9 ∆E
43.7 ∆E
57.5 ∆E
48.4 ∆E
33.2 ∆E
39.4 ∆E
28.6 ∆E
59.5 ∆E
59.9 ∆E
29 ∆E
44.2 ∆E
33.9 ∆E
69.6 ∆E
41.7 ∆E
39.7 ∆E
73.4 ∆E
66.9 ∆E
49.5 ∆E
35.3 ∆E
23.3 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
ColorChecker Nubia RedMagic 8 Pro: 43.36 ∆E min: 12.77 - max: 73.41 ∆E

显示器 - RedMagic智能手机中明亮的120赫兹AMOLED

子像素结构
子像素结构

RedMagic 8 Pro再次拥有一个6.8英寸AMOLED显示屏,刷新率高达120赫兹。这可以设置为60、90或120赫兹,但系统不会自动调整。

这款游戏智能手机的亮度大大增加,攀升到817cd/m²的平均值(7S专业版:627 cd/m²),甚至在峰值时可以达到995 cd/m²(APL18)。支持HLG和HDR10的HDR标准。

OLED面板使用脉宽调制,但有一个非常恒定和平坦的曲线。我们只能测量到60赫兹的频率,这表明永久的直流调光。

785
cd/m²
810
cd/m²
846
cd/m²
784
cd/m²
811
cd/m²
857
cd/m²
790
cd/m²
812
cd/m²
859
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 859 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 817.1 cd/m² Minimum: 3.27 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 811 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 3.4 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
98.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.39
Nubia RedMagic 8 Pro
AMOLED, 2480x1116, 6.80
Nubia RedMagic 7S Pro
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.80
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro
AMOLED, 2448x1080, 6.78
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.67
Response Times
398%
342%
-261%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
0.87 ?(0.4345, 0.436)
1.27 ?(0.571, 0.698)
-46%
1.042 ?(0.5158, 0.5258)
-20%
6 ?(3, 3)
-590%
Response Time Black / White *
1.37 ?(0.7155, 0.656)
1.3 ?(0.675, 0.6275)
5%
0.998 ?(0.4794, 0.5186)
27%
8 ?(5, 3)
-484%
PWM Frequency
60
801
1235%
672.1
1020%
235
292%
Screen
-14%
13%
-24%
Brightness middle
811
618
-24%
860
6%
642
-21%
Brightness
817
627
-23%
868
6%
637
-22%
Brightness Distribution
91
91
0%
97
7%
96
5%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.9
2.9
-0%
2.4
17%
3.19
-10%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
4.7
5.7
-21%
3.9
17%
7.12
-51%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
3.4
4
-18%
2.5
26%
4.9
-44%
Gamma
2.39 92%
2.35 94%
2.08 106%
2.22 99%
CCT
6390 102%
6098 107%
6640 98%
7671 85%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
192% / 123%
178% / 123%
-143% / -103%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
1.37 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.7155 ms rise
↘ 0.656 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
0.87 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.4345 ms rise
↘ 0.436 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 60 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 60 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 60 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

最小显示亮度
分钟。
25 %显示亮度
25 %
50 % 显示亮度
50 %
75 %显示亮度
75 %
最大手动显示亮度
100 %

具有固定变焦水平和不同亮度设置的测量系列

灰度(默认。P3色阶,色温:标准,目标色彩空间。DCI-P3)
灰度(默认。P3色阶,色温:标准,目标色彩空间。DCI-P3)
颜色(默认。P3色标,色温:标准,目标色彩空间。DCI-P3)
颜色(默认。P3色标,色温:标准,目标色彩空间。DCI-P3)
色彩空间(默认。P3色阶,色温:标准,目标色彩空间。DCI-P3)
色彩空间(默认。P3色阶,色温:标准,目标色彩空间。DCI-P3)
饱和度(默认。P3色阶,色温:标准,目标色彩空间。DCI-P3)
饱和度(默认。P3色阶,色温:标准,目标色彩空间。DCI-P3)
户外 (图片: Daniel Schmidt)
户外活动
视角 (图片: Daniel Schmidt)
视角

性能、排放和电池寿命--骁龙8代2的全速前进

RedMagic 8 Pro采用了最新的 Snapdragon 8 Gen 2并可根据型号使用12或16GB的LPDDR5x工作内存。由于有集成风扇,SoC的性能保持永久稳定,表面温度甚至不温不火。作为回报,这个小风扇变得相当响亮,在满负荷的情况下攀升到44dB(A)以上。由于它还以非常高的频率吹口哨,从长远来看,这种噪音是相当恼人的。

两个扬声器做得很好。然而,由于风扇的原因,耳机更适合,特别是由于音频插孔被证明是相当低的噪音(SPL:87.47 dBFS)。无线耳机还提供广泛的音频编解码支持(SBC、AAC、aptX、aptX HD、aptX自适应、aptX TWS+和LDAC)。

6,000毫安时的强大电池即使在启用120赫兹的情况下也能持续很长时间。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Nubia RedMagic 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
1496 Points
Xiaomi 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
1478 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (1048 - 1574, n=18)
1452 Points -3%
Nubia RedMagic 7S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1348 Points -10%
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 18432
1309 Points -12%
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1236 Points -17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (119 - 2138, n=217, last 2 years)
918 Points -39%
Multi-Core
Nubia RedMagic 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
5238 Points
Xiaomi 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
5090 Points -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (4192 - 5243, n=18)
4945 Points -6%
Nubia RedMagic 7S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
4233 Points -19%
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 18432
4162 Points -21%
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
3742 Points -29%
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 6681, n=217, last 2 years)
3009 Points -43%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 18432
17727 Points +41%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (11562 - 19783, n=19)
15689 Points +25%
Xiaomi 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
14094 Points +12%
Nubia RedMagic 7S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
13488 Points +7%
Nubia RedMagic 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
12600 Points
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
12578 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4761 - 21385, n=213, last 2 years)
11798 Points -6%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Nubia RedMagic 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
16067 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (10839 - 16291, n=14)
14809 Points -8%
Nubia RedMagic 7S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
12251 Points -24%
Xiaomi 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
11914 Points -26%
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 18432
11909 Points -26%
Average of class Smartphone
  (317 - 20131, n=180, last 2 years)
6789 Points -58%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Nubia RedMagic 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
25350 Points
Xiaomi 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
25306 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (18010 - 26802, n=14)
24853 Points -2%
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 18432
20955 Points -17%
Nubia RedMagic 7S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
20746 Points -18%
Average of class Smartphone
  (267 - 33376, n=179, last 2 years)
9811 Points -61%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Nubia RedMagic 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
7042 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (4177 - 7042, n=14)
6180 Points -12%
Nubia RedMagic 7S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
5035 Points -29%
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 18432
4743 Points -33%
Average of class Smartphone
  (938 - 8480, n=179, last 2 years)
4236 Points -40%
Xiaomi 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
4177 Points -41%
Wild Life Unlimited Score
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (13827 - 14737, n=17)
14089 Points +1%
Xiaomi 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
14002 Points 0%
Nubia RedMagic 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
13956 Points
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 18432
11024 Points -21%
Nubia RedMagic 7S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
10987 Points -21%
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
10238 Points -27%
Average of class Smartphone
  (394 - 20068, n=202, last 2 years)
6307 Points -55%
Wild Life Extreme
Xiaomi 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
3751 Points +1%
Nubia RedMagic 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
3732 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (3192 - 3935, n=18)
3698 Points -1%
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 18432
2818 Points -24%
Nubia RedMagic 7S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
2810 Points -25%
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
2606 Points -30%
Average of class Smartphone
  (22 - 5226, n=206, last 2 years)
1697 Points -55%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Xiaomi 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
3707 Points +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (3173 - 3900, n=19)
3661 Points 0%
Nubia RedMagic 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
3647 Points
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 18432
2760 Points -24%
Nubia RedMagic 7S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
2733 Points -25%
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
2534 Points -31%
Average of class Smartphone
  (110 - 5248, n=201, last 2 years)
1705 Points -53%
GFXBench
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
113 fps
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (45 - 143, n=19)
86.1 fps
Nubia RedMagic 7S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
75 fps
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 18432
74 fps
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.6 - 123, n=225, last 2 years)
44.2 fps
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
43 fps
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (82 - 181, n=19)
149.2 fps
Xiaomi 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
142 fps
Nubia RedMagic 7S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
98 fps
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 18432
97 fps
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.3 - 229, n=225, last 2 years)
64.5 fps
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
60 fps
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
66 fps
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (43 - 97, n=19)
64.8 fps
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 18432
62 fps
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
58 fps
Nubia RedMagic 7S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
53 fps
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.8 - 119, n=225, last 2 years)
32.9 fps
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (24 - 72, n=19)
60.9 fps
Xiaomi 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
56 fps
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 18432
36 fps
Nubia RedMagic 7S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
36 fps
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 94, n=225, last 2 years)
25.7 fps
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
19 fps
Octane V2 - Total Score
Nubia RedMagic 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
54773 Points
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 18432
53898 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (19870 - 65418, n=20)
44774 Points -18%
Xiaomi 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
43632 Points -20%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4633 - 89112, n=211, last 2 years)
33640 Points -39%
Nubia RedMagic 7S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
17622 Points -68%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 18432
82801 Points +391%
Average of class Smartphone
  (207 - 84787, n=150, last 2 years)
21814 Points +29%
Nubia RedMagic 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
16880 Points
Xiaomi 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
15961 Points -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (11338 - 16880, n=16)
15326 Points -9%
Nubia RedMagic 8 ProNubia RedMagic 7S ProAsus ROG Phone 6 ProXiaomi Black Shark 5 ProXiaomi 13Average 256 GB UFS 4.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-42%
-33%
-31%
-2%
-10%
-51%
Sequential Read 256KB
3556.62
1822.05
-49%
1949.16
-45%
1945.4
-45%
3454.01
-3%
Sequential Write 256KB
2719.64
1258.69
-54%
1454.5
-47%
1485.2
-45%
2722.77
0%
2443 ?(1014 - 3346, n=19)
-10%
Random Read 4KB
393.88
327.23
-17%
297.48
-24%
344.9
-12%
393.81
0%
Random Write 4KB
551.93
287.63
-48%
459.66
-17%
424.8
-23%
536.76
-3%

温度

Max. Load
 30.1 °C29.6 °C29.2 °C 
 30.3 °C30 °C29.4 °C 
 30 °C29.3 °C29.5 °C 
Maximum: 30.3 °C
Average: 29.7 °C
28.6 °C29 °C29.6 °C
28.5 °C29.2 °C30.1 °C
27.8 °C30 °C29.4 °C
Maximum: 30.1 °C
Average: 29.1 °C
Power Supply (max.)  27.5 °C | Room Temperature 21.4 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 29.7 °C / 85 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 30.3 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 30.1 °C / 86 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.3 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.


带主动式风扇

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
Nubia RedMagic 8 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø22 (22-22.4)
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; with Fan: Ø16.7 (16.6-16.7)
Xiaomi 13 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø20.6 (17.7-22.4)
Nubia RedMagic 8 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø81.1 (81-81.2)
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; without Fan: Ø61.5 (59.8-62.8)
Xiaomi 13 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø68.6 (62.7-79.5)
Nubia RedMagic 8 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø83.9 (83.9-84)
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; with Fan: Ø65.7 (65.6-66.1)
Xiaomi 13 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø80 (76.5-84.2)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.836.22527.928.23124.325.64028.227.15036.735.36322.221.58025.420.41002120.612518.620.416015.419.520015.118.525013.133.13151226.340012.716.450011.820.863012.919.680010.421.4100013.322.3125013.225.9160012.130.7200012.233.8250012.935.1315014.837.3400015.834500016.129.4630014.431.4800013.630.71000013.532.31250014.432.5160001531.9SPL25.944.3N0.74.2median 13.5median 29.4Delta1.36.2hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseNubia RedMagic 8 Pro

演讲者

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2028.838.62526.335.33125.641.34018.6455030.2416320.544.18019.548.510018.450.412513.650.616011.653.42001254.72501256.331510.157.640010.160.750010.567.463010.369.48001072.610009.877.8125011.379.7160011.281.1200011.482.3250011.982.2315013.984.8400014.78450001482.3630014.678.5800013.573.31000013.367.81250013.762.91600013.956.7SPL24.892.9N0.690.2median 12median 72.6Delta1.711.342.640.32944.427.841.225.845.432.547.922.446.224.548.519.449.316.552.618.458.712.858.49.958.311.363.113.163.911.473.21177.211.680.712.381.21282.112.482.812.283.61383.412.881.513.280.913.480.413.882.513.379.313.372.913.567.613.161.324.993.30.6101.6median 13median 79.30.88.8hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseNubia RedMagic 8 ProAsus ROG Phone 6 Pro
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Nubia RedMagic 8 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (92.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (2.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 15% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 37% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (93.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.6% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 19% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命

Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing
Nubia RedMagic 8 Pro
6000 mAh
1120 min
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro
6000 mAh
1097 min -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (424 - 2844, n=227, last 2 years)
913 min -18%
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro
4650 mAh
752 min -33%
Nubia RedMagic 7S Pro
5000 mAh
748 min -33%
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 108)
18h 40min

Pros

+ 不折不扣的性能
+ 快速的WLAN,包括Wi-Fi 7
+ 电池寿命长
+ 额外的触摸传感器

Cons

- 不确定的更新供应
- 风扇很响

结论 - RedMagic 8 Pro变成了一个快节奏的游戏者

在审查中。RedMagic 8 Pro。测试设备由Nubia提供。
在审查中。RedMagic 8 Pro。测试设备由Nubia提供。

努比亚RedMagic 8 Pro是一款真正的游戏智能手机,它在设计和集成RGB照明方面也强调了这一点。风扇让人锦上添花,在测试中证明是非常有效的,但不幸的是也相当吵。

长边的额外感应键在游戏时也是一个真正的附加值。一个成熟的音频插孔也是一个罕见的现象。快速和现代的通信设备使之更加完善。

RedMagic 8 Pro以一个有吸引力的入门级价格提供了大量的游戏能力。

与价格较高的竞争对手相比,你必须做的是没有一些HDR标准,除此之外,面板的亮度也不太理想。如果能自动调整刷新率,当然是最好不过了。相机也不能在所有方面都让人信服,但UD相机的最大优势是不会在显示屏上留下明显的中断痕迹。最大的妥协是更新供应的不确定时间。一个以上的主要更新可能是不可能的。

我们的测试模型已经可以直接从RedMagic那里获得,起价649欧元。那些想拥有更多内存的Void设计版本的人将不得不掏出799欧元。强有力的替代品,但仍采用去年的SoC,是 华硕ROG手机6 Pro, ROG Phone 6D,以及 黑鲨5 Pro.

价格和可用性

努比亚RedMagic 8 Pro可以直接从制造商的商店购买,地址是https://eu.redmagic.gg/de/products/redmagic-8-pro但也可以在亚马逊上买到。

Nubia RedMagic 8 Pro - 02/17/2023 v7
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis
83%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
94%
Connectivity
59 / 70 → 84%
Weight
88%
Battery
92%
Display
90%
Games Performance
82 / 64 → 100%
Application Performance
96 / 86 → 100%
Temperature
95%
Noise
62%
Audio
76 / 90 → 84%
Camera
61%
Average
80%
86%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 努比亚RedMagic 8 Pro评测--具有100%性能的游戏智能手机
Daniel Schmidt, 2023-02-19 (Update: 2023-02-19)