Notebookcheck Logo

努比亚RedMagic 6R智能手机评测--144赫兹的游戏和炙热的手指

不仅是价格火爆。 RedMagic 6R名义上是一款强大的游戏智能手机,配备骁龙888,144Hz AMOLED显示屏和肩部按钮。高端的设备使整个包装以不到500欧元(约588美元)的价格完成。听起来很划算,但在测试中造成问题的不仅仅是冷却。
5G Android Gaming Smartphone Touchscreen
Nubia RedMagic 6R (RedMagic Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G 8 x 1.8 - 2.8 GHz, Cortex-X1 / A78 / A55 (Kryo 680)
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 660
Memory
12 GB 
, LPDDR5
Display
6.67 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 395 PPI, Capacitive Touchscreen, 10 Multitouch Points, 360 Hz Touch-Sampling-Rate, AMOLED, glossy: yes, HDR, 144 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 256 GB 
, 225 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Gravitational acceleration, Gyroscope, Geomagnetic sensor, Proximity sensor, OTG
Networking
Wi-Fi 6E (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.2, 2G (900, 1800 MHz), 3G (Band 1, 8), 4G (Band 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 34, 38, 40), 5G (Band 41, 78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7.8 x 163.04 x 75.34
Battery
4200 mAh Lithium-Ion
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 11
Camera
Primary Camera: 64 MPix (IMX682, 78.3°, 0.8 μm, f/1.8) + 8 MPix (Ultrawide, 120°, 1.12 μm, f/2.2) + 2 MPix (Depth, 1.75 μm, f/2.4) + 5 MPix (Macro, 78°, 1.4 μm, f/2.4); 8k-video, Camera2-API-Level: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix (1.0 μm, f/2.0)
Additional features
Speakers: Mono, Keyboard: Onscreen, 30W-Charger, USB-Cabel (Type-A to Type-C), Adapter (USB-C to Audio Jack), Silicon Case, SIM-Tool, RedMagic OS 4.0, 12 Months Warranty, SAR: Not specified; DRM Widevine L1, Shoulder Trigger Buttons: 400 Hz touch sampling rate, dual pressure touch buttons; GNSS: GPS (L1, L5), Glonass (L1), Galileo (E1, E5a), BeiDou (B1, B1C, B2a), fanless
Weight
186.41 g, Power Supply: 91 g
Price
599 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible competitors in comparison

Rating
Rating Version
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Price from
81.6 %7
08/2021
Nubia RedMagic 6R
SD 888 5G, Adreno 660
186.41 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.67"2400x1080
88 %7
03/2021
Asus ROG Phone 5
SD 888 5G, Adreno 660
239 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.78"2448x1080
84.7 %7
Nubia RedMagic 5S
SD 865, Adreno 650
218 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.65"2340x1080
87.7 %7
04/2021
Lenovo Legion Phone Duel 2
SD 888 5G, Adreno 660
259 g512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.92"2460x1080

案例、设备和操作

努比亚RedMagic 6R有深蓝色和高光银两种颜色,看起来很不错。建造质量也令人满意。间隙和抗扭刚度都很好,但肩部按钮可以设计得更有吸引力。

配置上有一些缝隙。除了microSD插槽,还缺少一个音频插孔。然而,USB 3.2(Gen. 1)是一个快速的数据接口,也支持有线图像输出。移动网络的频率配置也只限于最基本的东西。努比亚在这方面确实偷工减料,尽管支持欧洲的相关频率。另一方面,Wi-Fi模块不仅使用最新的Wi-Fi 6E标准,而且在测试中以稳定和快速的传输速率说服了我们的参考路由器Netgear Nighthawk AX12。

我们非常喜欢RedMagic 6R拿在耳边时的语音质量。即使是大多数环境噪音也被可靠地过滤掉了;它只有在非常大的噪音中才达到极限,并且有短暂的传输中断。在扬声器模式下,用户会有一点回声,并且记录得比较模糊。支持VoLTE和WLAN通话。完整的双SIM卡也在机上,但不能使用eSIM。

谷歌的Android 11被用作操作系统,该系统由略微定制的RedMagic UI覆盖。它的特点是在翻译上有一些空白和特殊性。例如,位置被简单地翻译为where。

触摸屏对输入的反应非常可靠,并能快速实现。光学指纹扫描仪有时反应有点迟钝,识别率可以更好一点。后者在面部识别(2D)方面的成功率更高,但是,这也不太安全。

Size comparison

176 mm 78.5 mm 9.9 mm 259 g172.83 mm 77.25 mm 9.9 mm 239 g168.56 mm 78 mm 9.75 mm 218 g163.04 mm 75.34 mm 7.8 mm 186.41 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Asus ROG Phone 5
Wi-Fi 6E
1238 (643min - 1325max) MBit/s +4%
Nubia RedMagic 6R
Wi-Fi 6E
1189 (693min - 1261max) MBit/s
Nubia RedMagic 5S
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
681 (343min - 699max) MBit/s -43%
Lenovo Legion Phone Duel 2
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
680 (620min - 697max) MBit/s -43%
iperf3 receive AX12
Nubia RedMagic 5S
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
870 (371min - 959max) MBit/s +10%
Lenovo Legion Phone Duel 2
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
789 (660min - 853max) MBit/s 0%
Asus ROG Phone 5
Wi-Fi 6E
788 (735min - 867max) MBit/s 0%
Nubia RedMagic 6R
Wi-Fi 6E
788 (710min - 861max) MBit/s
0651301952603253904555205856507157808459109751040110511701235Tooltip
Nubia RedMagic 6R; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø787 (710-861)
Nubia RedMagic 6R; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1167 (693-1261)

摄像机 - RedMagic 6R中的四摄像头

与RedMagic 6R自拍
与RedMagic 6R自拍

努比亚RedMagic 6R的前置摄像头可以实现良好的自拍,并具有平衡的照明。美颜滤镜是永久有效的,但可以根据用户的喜好进行调整。

主摄像头依靠一个6400万像素的传感器,在白天提供相当体面的图片效果,但在锐度和动态方面缺乏一点。然而,与主传感器相比,额外的镜头在质量上有很大下降。视频甚至可以用8K录制。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Wide angleWide angleZoom (5x)Low-Light
ColorChecker
7.6 ∆E
1 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
2.6 ∆E
2.1 ∆E
2.1 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
2.8 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
2.1 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
1.7 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
0.7 ∆E
ColorChecker Nubia RedMagic 6R: 4.09 ∆E min: 0.7 - max: 11.84 ∆E
ColorChecker
28.6 ∆E
51.8 ∆E
38.8 ∆E
35.9 ∆E
43.9 ∆E
61.1 ∆E
51.9 ∆E
34.8 ∆E
39.3 ∆E
27.4 ∆E
63.2 ∆E
62.8 ∆E
30.5 ∆E
47.2 ∆E
34.3 ∆E
73.7 ∆E
41.1 ∆E
42.9 ∆E
85.5 ∆E
69.5 ∆E
51 ∆E
36.6 ∆E
24.1 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
ColorChecker Nubia RedMagic 6R: 45.4 ∆E min: 13.76 - max: 85.52 ∆E

显示器 - 144赫兹面板,低亮度

子像素结构
子像素结构

RedMagic 6R的6.67英寸(16.94厘米)AMOLED显示屏提供高达144赫兹的刷新率,分辨率为2400 x 1080像素。

无论是使用(442 cd/m²)还是不使用传感器(435 cd/m²),亮度都在一个类似的水平上工作,甚至在明亮和黑暗区域的均匀分布(APL50)(452 cd/m²)的情况下也几乎没有增加,对于支持HDR10+的智能手机来说,这是一个最佳选择。我们的测试设备在任何时候都没有达到承诺的770尼特。因此,在户外,可读性在明亮的日子里是有限的。

OLED的闪烁也是相当不寻常的。在最低亮度时,它在66和178.6赫兹之间波动。除此之外,频率增加,在181.2和769.2赫兹之间波动。从51%的可调亮度开始,面板就进入了90赫兹模式,尽管我们在设置中选择了固定的144赫兹。在这一点上,显示器甚至没有特别明亮的120cd/m²。

对于一款游戏智能手机来说,屏幕的校准是不错的。

422
cd/m²
441
cd/m²
457
cd/m²
423
cd/m²
442
cd/m²
461
cd/m²
426
cd/m²
439
cd/m²
469
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 469 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 442.2 cd/m² Minimum: 4.08 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 442 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 3.3 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
99.2% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.25
Nubia RedMagic 6R
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.67
Asus ROG Phone 5
AMOLED, 2448x1080, 6.78
Nubia RedMagic 5S
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.65
Lenovo Legion Phone Duel 2
AMOLED, 2460x1080, 6.92
Response Times
13%
10%
-71%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
4 ?(2, 2)
2.4 ?(1.2, 1.2)
40%
2.8 ?(1.2, 1.6)
30%
8 ?(5, 3)
-100%
Response Time Black / White *
3.2 ?(2, 1.2)
2.4 ?(1.2, 1.2)
25%
2.4 ?(1.2, 1.2)
25%
6 ?(3, 3)
-88%
PWM Frequency
769 ?(51)
568 ?(22)
-26%
581 ?(99)
-24%
568
-26%
Screen
49%
-15%
-13%
Brightness middle
442
789
79%
589
33%
463
5%
Brightness
442
795
80%
592
34%
466
5%
Brightness Distribution
90
98
9%
90
0%
98
9%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.2
1.4
36%
3.1
-41%
3.24
-47%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
4.9
3
39%
7.2
-47%
5.75
-17%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
3.3
1.7
48%
5.6
-70%
4.4
-33%
Gamma
2.25 98%
2.27 97%
2.31 95%
2.201 100%
CCT
7101 92%
6596 99%
6633 98%
7273 89%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
31% / 37%
-3% / -7%
-42% / -32%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
3.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2 ms rise
↘ 1.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 9 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2 ms rise
↘ 2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 9 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 769 Hz ≤ 51 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 769 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 51 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 769 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18071 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

灰度(配置文件:自然,色温:暖;目标色彩空间:sRGB
灰度(配置文件:自然,色温:暖;目标色彩空间:sRGB
混合色(配置文件:自然,色温:暖;目标色彩空间:sRGB
混合色(配置文件:自然,色温:暖;目标色彩空间:sRGB
色彩空间(配置文件:自然,色温:暖;目标色彩空间:sRGB
色彩空间(配置文件:自然,色温:暖;目标色彩空间:sRGB
饱和度(配置文件:自然,色温:暖;目标色彩空间:sRGB
饱和度(配置文件:自然,色温:暖;目标色彩空间:sRGB
在户外
在户外
视角稳定
视角稳定

性能、排放和电池寿命

骁龙888 骁龙888名义上提供巨大的计算能力,并由12GB的LPDDR5内存支持。努比亚RedMagic 6R在系统模式下已经略微发热,但没有什么会让我们觉得讨厌的。这在负载下看起来有所不同。

这款游戏智能手机在正常负载测试中已经变热,表面温度高达52.9°C(约127°F)。这已经非常令人不快了。此外,系统在测试中中断了充电过程,以避免电池过热。在3DMark Wild Life压力测试中,RedMagic 6R完全不能说服人。它在两个变体中都简单地关闭了,因为它变得太热了。我们可以在智能手机的表面测量到57.6°C(约136°F),关闭后立即进行。RedMagic掌握了GFXBench,没有崩溃。不幸的是,我们无法读取结果,因为应用程序关闭了。然而,确定的总帧数显示,在测试期间,帧率被限制在60 FPS。

在3DMark期间,一个基准检测也启动了,它提供了大约5%的提升。如果我们隐藏3DMark,甚至有可能得到Sling Shot(极限)的屏幕测试结果。其他配备骁龙888的智能手机由于性能高,实际上只显示Maxed Out!

肩部按钮在游戏中令人信服,特别是在射击游戏中是一个真正的资产。在PUBG 等游戏中起作用的4D振动反馈相当不错,但有时调校得不太合适。流行的射击游戏的90赫兹模式被限制在最低的细节水平,但在更高的设置下也能顺利运行。这里也有明显的升温,但任何时候都不会变得令人不快。因此,由于冷却效果不佳,明显的限制是不可预期的,因为Snapdragon提供了足够的性能储备,而且Nubia在软件限制方面采取了预防措施。

下巴一侧的单声道扬声器提供了一个体面的声音,但对于一款游戏智能手机来说,它的尺寸有点小,位置也不合适。

电池运行时间不是特别长,而且RedMagic 6R在待机时也严重依赖自己的电池。让智能手机不插电过夜会浪费大约四分之一的电池电量。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core (sort by value)
Nubia RedMagic 6R
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
1129 Points
Asus ROG Phone 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
1124 Points 0%
Nubia RedMagic 5S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
904 Points -20%
Lenovo Legion Phone Duel 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
1132 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (976 - 1198, n=27)
1118 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (119 - 2138, n=214, last 2 years)
900 Points -20%
Multi-Core (sort by value)
Nubia RedMagic 6R
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
3660 Points
Asus ROG Phone 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
3717 Points +2%
Nubia RedMagic 5S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
3264 Points -11%
Lenovo Legion Phone Duel 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
3702 Points +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (3204 - 3810, n=27)
3571 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 6681, n=214, last 2 years)
2947 Points -19%
PCMark for Android
Work 3.0 (sort by value)
Nubia RedMagic 6R
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
13273 Points
Asus ROG Phone 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
16391 Points +23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (11435 - 17085, n=21)
14307 Points +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4761 - 21385, n=209, last 2 years)
11643 Points -12%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Asus ROG Phone 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
15027 Points
Nubia RedMagic 5S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
11075 Points
Lenovo Legion Phone Duel 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
13586 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (10231 - 15027, n=10)
12376 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (9101 - 12871, n=4, last 2 years)
10872 Points
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Nubia RedMagic 6R
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
10365 Points
Nubia RedMagic 6R
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
10111 Points -2%
Asus ROG Phone 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
10273 Points -1%
Nubia RedMagic 5S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
9647 Points -7%
Lenovo Legion Phone Duel 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
11302 Points +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (8065 - 11534, n=20)
10135 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (704 - 23024, n=115, last 2 years)
9038 Points -13%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Nubia RedMagic 6R
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
15623 Points
Nubia RedMagic 6R
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
14884 Points -5%
Asus ROG Phone 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
15263 Points -2%
Nubia RedMagic 5S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
12605 Points -19%
Lenovo Legion Phone Duel 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
16586 Points +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (10491 - 17179, n=20)
15130 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (607 - 45492, n=114, last 2 years)
15757 Points +1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Nubia RedMagic 6R
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
4764 Points
Nubia RedMagic 6R
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
4759 Points 0%
Asus ROG Phone 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
4791 Points +1%
Nubia RedMagic 5S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
5296 Points +11%
Lenovo Legion Phone Duel 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
5344 Points +12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (2975 - 5434, n=20)
4760 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1075 - 8749, n=114, last 2 years)
4335 Points -9%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Nubia RedMagic 6R
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
7596 Points
Nubia RedMagic 5S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
7653 Points +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (6140 - 7596, n=2)
6868 Points -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (286 - 7890, n=104, last 2 years)
2680 Points -65%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Nubia RedMagic 6R
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
9436 Points
Nubia RedMagic 5S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
9167 Points -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (6816 - 9436, n=2)
8126 Points -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (240 - 9814, n=104, last 2 years)
2667 Points -72%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Nubia RedMagic 6R
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
4514 Points
Nubia RedMagic 5S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
4850 Points +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (4514 - 4557, n=2)
4536 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (858 - 4679, n=104, last 2 years)
3126 Points -31%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Nubia RedMagic 6R
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
9374 Points
Nubia RedMagic 6R
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
8921 Points -5%
Asus ROG Phone 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
9620 Points +3%
Nubia RedMagic 5S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
8022 Points -14%
Lenovo Legion Phone Duel 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
9839 Points +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (6110 - 9839, n=21)
8532 Points -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (317 - 20131, n=177, last 2 years)
6571 Points -30%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Nubia RedMagic 6R
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
12396 Points
Nubia RedMagic 6R
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
12266 Points -1%
Asus ROG Phone 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
12616 Points +2%
Nubia RedMagic 5S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
9395 Points -24%
Lenovo Legion Phone Duel 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
12914 Points +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (7930 - 12914, n=21)
11629 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (267 - 33376, n=176, last 2 years)
9383 Points -24%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Nubia RedMagic 6R
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
5058 Points
Nubia RedMagic 6R
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
4565 Points -10%
Asus ROG Phone 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
5254 Points +4%
Nubia RedMagic 5S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
5307 Points +5%
Lenovo Legion Phone Duel 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
5366 Points +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (2579 - 5366, n=21)
4511 Points -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (938 - 8480, n=176, last 2 years)
4169 Points -18%
Wild Life Score (sort by value)
Nubia RedMagic 6R
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
5859 Points
Asus ROG Phone 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
5722 Points -2%
Lenovo Legion Phone Duel 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
5887 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (3958 - 5942, n=26)
5674 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (395 - 9839, n=132, last 2 years)
2528 Points -57%
Wild Life Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Nubia RedMagic 6R
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
5839 Points
Asus ROG Phone 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
5703 Points -2%
Lenovo Legion Phone Duel 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
5876 Points +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (3959 - 5925, n=26)
5617 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (394 - 20068, n=197, last 2 years)
6135 Points +5%
Wild Life Stress Test Stability (sort by value)
Nubia RedMagic 6R
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
0 %
Asus ROG Phone 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
94.2 (5375min - 5708max) %
Asus ROG Phone 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
84.1 (4785min - 5690max) %
Lenovo Legion Phone Duel 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
90.4 (5293min - 5852max) %
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (54.7 - 97.4, n=24)
78.1 %
Average of class Smartphone
  (36 - 99.8, n=186, last 2 years)
84.3 %
Wild Life Extreme (sort by value)
Nubia RedMagic 6R
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
1535 Points
Asus ROG Phone 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
1511 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (1236 - 1602, n=21)
1516 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (22 - 5226, n=202, last 2 years)
1647 Points +7%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited (sort by value)
Nubia RedMagic 6R
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
1516 Points
Asus ROG Phone 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
1501 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (974 - 1564, n=21)
1421 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (110 - 5248, n=197, last 2 years)
1656 Points +9%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test (sort by value)
Nubia RedMagic 6R
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
0 %
Asus ROG Phone 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
96.4 (1454min - 1509max) %
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (54.9 - 99.7, n=18)
82.2 %
Average of class Smartphone
  (33.7 - 99.7, n=174, last 2 years)
84.8 %
GFXBench
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Nubia RedMagic 6R
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
66 fps
Asus ROG Phone 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
66 fps 0%
Nubia RedMagic 5S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
50 fps -24%
Lenovo Legion Phone Duel 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
60 fps -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (32 - 73, n=26)
55.7 fps -16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.6 - 123, n=221, last 2 years)
43.1 fps -35%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Nubia RedMagic 6R
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
79 fps
Asus ROG Phone 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
80 fps +1%
Nubia RedMagic 5S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
53 fps -33%
Lenovo Legion Phone Duel 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
71 fps -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (46 - 87, n=27)
70.4 fps -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.3 - 229, n=221, last 2 years)
63.1 fps -20%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Nubia RedMagic 6R
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
42 fps
Asus ROG Phone 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
41 fps -2%
Nubia RedMagic 5S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
32 fps -24%
Lenovo Legion Phone Duel 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
40 fps -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (25 - 51, n=26)
38.5 fps -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.8 - 105, n=221, last 2 years)
32.1 fps -24%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Nubia RedMagic 6R
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
29 fps
Asus ROG Phone 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
32 fps +10%
Nubia RedMagic 5S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
21 fps -28%
Lenovo Legion Phone Duel 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
27 fps -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (19 - 32, n=26)
27.5 fps -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 94, n=221, last 2 years)
25.1 fps -13%
Nubia RedMagic 6RAsus ROG Phone 5Nubia RedMagic 5SLenovo Legion Phone Duel 2Average 256 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
17%
-7%
15%
30%
15%
Sequential Read 256KB
1330
1779
34%
1348
1%
1999
50%
1768 ?(1004 - 2037, n=86)
33%
1471 ?(215 - 4512, n=213, last 2 years)
11%
Sequential Write 256KB
690
795
15%
674
-2%
754
9%
1136 ?(452 - 1873, n=86)
65%
1084 ?(57.5 - 3678, n=213, last 2 years)
57%
Random Read 4KB
227.2
291.4
28%
213.3
-6%
262.6
16%
281 ?(173.5 - 543, n=86)
24%
243 ?(22.2 - 543, n=213, last 2 years)
7%
Random Write 4KB
312.9
278
-11%
243.5
-22%
261.5
-16%
311 ?(197.5 - 499, n=87)
-1%
267 ?(13 - 709, n=213, last 2 years)
-15%

PUBG Mobile - Benchmarks

051015202530354045505560657075808590Tooltip
Nubia RedMagic 6R; Smooth; 1.5.0: Ø89.2 (80-91)
Nubia RedMagic 6R; Balanced; 1.5.0: Ø59.8 (56-61)
Nubia RedMagic 6R; HD; 1.5.0: Ø59.7 (54-61)
Nubia RedMagic 6R; Ultra HD; 1.5.0: Ø39.9 (38-41)

温度

Max. Load
 52.9 °C51.2 °C47.3 °C 
 51.7 °C49.8 °C46.5 °C 
 50.6 °C45.5 °C45 °C 
Maximum: 52.9 °C
Average: 48.9 °C
43.8 °C46.8 °C50.8 °C
42.7 °C45.5 °C50.6 °C
42.7 °C46.5 °C47.1 °C
Maximum: 50.8 °C
Average: 46.3 °C
Power Supply (max.)  34.3 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 48.9 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 52.9 °C / 127 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 50.8 °C / 123 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.2 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.


演讲者

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2041.738.82531.837.23126.539.64023.6395038.543.2633042.88027.643.110024.541.612514.84316018.347.920015.950.625016.656.231515.360.140014.26150015.164.963014.167.380012.572.1100014.774.7125015.176.7160014.778.6200014.381.2250014.783.7315014.582.9400014.384.2500014.176.1630014.373.8800014.480.61000014.381.51250014.364.91600013.163.5SPL26.792.1N0.888.3median 14.5median 73.8Delta0.710.632.637.625.544.129.739.831.142.234.940.423.94323.650.22351.617.350.218.458.514.45913.658.714.963.811.967.610.274.211.580.111.678.111.97913.277.713.278.613.282.112.784.113.483.913.881.614.580.113.978.614.173.61472.514.373.416.266.625.592.40.794.7median 13.8median 77.70.97.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseNubia RedMagic 6RAsus ROG Phone 5
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Nubia RedMagic 6R audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (92.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.9% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.7% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 20% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 42% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Asus ROG Phone 5 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (92.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 13% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命

Nubia RedMagic 6R
4200 mAh
Asus ROG Phone 5
6000 mAh
Nubia RedMagic 5S
4500 mAh
Lenovo Legion Phone Duel 2
5500 mAh
Average of class Smartphone
 
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
541
754
39%
730
35%
907
68%
912 ?(424 - 2844, n=224, last 2 years)
69%
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing (NextWord 1.2.6)
9h 01min

Pros

+ 良好的语音质量
+ 额外的肩部按钮
+ 带图像输出的USB 3.2(第一代)。
+ 快速的系统性能

Cons

- 冷却效果差
- 显示屏比宣传的更暗
- 144赫兹并不总是可用
- 耗电量高

结论 - RedMagic 6R有改进的潜力

在审查中。RedMagic 6R。测试设备由RedMagic Global提供。
在审查中。RedMagic 6R。测试设备由RedMagic Global提供。

努比亚RedMagic 6R对游戏玩家来说是一个真正的便宜货。起价499欧元(8/128GB版本,约587美元),它提供了一个吸引人的设计、骁龙888、144 Hz AMOLED显示屏、额外的肩部按钮、USB 3.2和四摄像头。

然而,仔细观察就会发现,该显示屏不能兑现其发光的承诺,也不能永久保持144赫兹,因为该智能手机在高亮度范围内将刷新率降低到90赫兹。考虑到已经很高的能源消耗,这是一个可以理解的决定。

RedMagic 6R不能保持所有的承诺,在测试中尤其在冷却和耗电方面显示出弱点。

然而,我们发现这款智能手机的弱点冷却更令人不安。由于温度过高,充电过程在正常负荷下已经被打断了。如果RedMagic 6R必须表现良好,如在3DMark Extreme压力测试中,它就会因为过热而简单地关闭,而且外面真的很热。

一个廉价的游戏替代品是 黑鲨4,但它只有机械肩键和一个较弱的摄像头设置。如果你主要是想用很少的钱获得大量的性能,你也应该看一下 波克 F3以及 真正的GT然而,它们并不是游戏智能手机。如果你不想妥协,你只有 华硕ROG手机5,但它也在一个不同的价格范围内发挥。

价格和可用性

RedMagic 6R的小内存配置(8GB RAM,128GB UFS 3.1)起价为499欧元(约587美元)。这里测试的12GB RAM和256GB ROM的变体价格高出100欧元(约118美元)。两者都可以直接从RedMagic的在线商店订购。.除此以外,在测试时,它在这个国家还没有上市。网上零售商如亚马逊不过,确实有配套的外壳和保护膜。

Nubia RedMagic 6R - 08/30/2022 v7
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis
82%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
91%
Connectivity
64 / 70 → 92%
Weight
89%
Battery
85%
Display
89%
Games Performance
57 / 64 → 89%
Application Performance
85 / 86 → 99%
Temperature
25%
Noise
100%
Audio
74 / 90 → 82%
Camera
59%
Average
74%
82%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 努比亚RedMagic 6R智能手机评测--144赫兹的游戏和炙热的手指
Daniel Schmidt, 2021-08-14 (Update: 2021-08-14)