Notebookcheck Logo

小米黑鲨5 Pro智能手机评测--最适合游戏的手机?

触发式的快乐。 小米以新的外观、更快的SoC、稍大的电池和新的主摄像头更新其游戏手机。黑鲨5 Pro是对雄心勃勃的游戏玩家的推荐吗?
5G Android ARM Gaming Smartphone
小米黑鲨5 Pro
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro (Black Shark Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 8 x 1.8 - 3 GHz, Cortex-X2 / A710 / A510 (Kryo) Waipio
Graphics adapter
Memory
12288 MB 
Display
6.67 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 395 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, AMOLED, 720Hz sampling rate, MEMC, glossy: yes, HDR, 144 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 256 GB 
, 240 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: audio via USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Gravity sensor, Proximity sensor, Gyroscope, Compass
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth Bluetooth 5.2, 2G, 3G, 4G (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B18/B19/B20/B26/B28a/B34/B38/B39/B40/B41), 5G NR SA&NSA, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 9.5 x 163.9 x 76.5
Battery
4650 mAh Lithium-Ion, dual cell, 120 Watt charging
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 12
Camera
Primary Camera: 108 MPix f/​1.75, phase comparison-AF, dual LED-flash, Videos @2160p/​60fps (Camera 1); 8 MP, f/​2.2, wide angle lens (Camera 2); 5 MP, f/​2.4, contrast-AF, macro lens (Camera 3)
Secondary Camera: 20 MPix Videos @1080p/​30fps
Additional features
Speakers: stereo speakers, Keyboard: virtual keyboard, charger, USB-C cable, SIM tool, bumper, 24 Months Warranty, notification LED (rear/​multicoloured), shoulder buttons (mechanical), fanless
Weight
220 g
Price
899 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

可能的竞争对手比较

Benchmark Comparison Plugin: ERROR, Layout "57" not supported!

箱子和设备。可以有更高的质量

几年前,小米推出第一款黑鲨品牌的手机时,是游戏手机的先驱。第五代Pro机型再次拥有很多你在纸面上期待的游戏手机的功能,而且以799欧元(约合799美元)的价格,已经比竞争对手如 华硕ROG手机5s.

具体来说,黑鲨5 Pro有以下几种型号。

  • 小米黑鲨5 Pro 8 GB内存/128 GB大容量存储:799欧元
  • 小米黑鲨5 Pro 12 GB内存/256 GB大容量存储:899欧元
  • 小米黑鲨5 Pro 16 GB内存/256 GB大容量存储:999欧元

不幸的是,在测试时,最昂贵的变体几乎没有,仅100欧元的纯RAM升级对大多数用户来说不太可能是值得的。

白色和黑色的颜色可供选择,但专业型的设计传统上比黑鲨5更大胆,它的背面有哑光涂层,线条类似电路图或机器上的未来主义标记。这款智能手机的手感很好,但整体看起来只算一般,而且背部中央很容易凹陷。

仍然没有IP认证,USB-C端口内部只按照USB 2.0标准连接,这导致数据传输缓慢。不过,NFC和蓝牙5.2已经搭载。

小米黑鲨5 Pro
小米黑鲨5 Pro
小米黑鲨5 Pro
小米黑鲨5 Pro
小米黑鲨5 Pro
小米黑鲨5 Pro
小米黑鲨5 Pro
小米黑鲨5 Pro

尺寸比较

Benchmark Comparison Plugin: ERROR, Layout "0" not supported!

通信、软件和操作。没有及时的安全更新

黑鲨5 Pro具有Wi-Fi 6功能,甚至比它的前辈还要快一些。5G也包括在内,同时支持这么多的4G频率,当你去大多数地方旅行时,你可以轻松访问移动互联网。

黑鲨5 Pro使用JoyUI 13,它基于Android 12。在测试时,安全更新是2022年3月的,因此迫切需要更新。当被问及时,"每几个月更新一次,为期两年 "是制造商的更新理念。

长边上有两个磁性触发器,可以机械地折叠出来。当然,它们主要是作为肩部按钮,可以在许多游戏中分配功能。在日常的智能手机使用中,它们也可以作为额外的按钮使用。小米想出了一些功能,但并不是所有的功能都以你第一次阅读时就能理解的方式描述。唯一的办法是自己尝试弄清楚。

指纹传感器位于外壳右侧的待机按钮上。它以最小的延迟解锁设备,并可靠地检测到我们的手指。通过人脸识别解锁也是可能的,但只能是二维的。这显然是更不安全的,不应该用于安全解锁,例如在银行应用程序中。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Asus ROG Phone 5s
Wi-Fi 6E
853 (437min - 891max) MBit/s ∼100%
Xiaomi Black Shark 4
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
656 (613min - 676max) MBit/s ∼77%
iperf3 receive AX12
Asus ROG Phone 5s
Wi-Fi 6E
839 (794min - 888max) MBit/s ∼100%
Xiaomi Black Shark 4
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
811 (771min - 835max) MBit/s ∼97%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Nubia RedMagic 7
Wi-Fi 6E
227 (74min - 399max) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Nubia RedMagic 7
Wi-Fi 6E
717 (608min - 815max) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
853 (785min - 906max) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
943 (893min - 950max) MBit/s ∼100%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900Tooltip
; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø853 (785-906)
; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø943 (893-950)

照相机。黑鲨5 Pro提供良好的图像质量

前置摄像头的录制
前置摄像头的录制

由于黑鲨5 Pro的新108MP主摄像头,照片默认以27MP的分辨率记录。这是因为相机使用了像素分选,以获得更高的出光率,但如果需要,它也可以使用全分辨率。

照片看起来有点模糊,但实际上我们相当喜欢这种增亮效果。照片结果很好,有很好的细节和清晰度,特别是在低光和高对比度的情况下。与前代产品一样,也有一个广角镜头和一个微距镜头。这些都做得很好,但由于相对较低的细节水平,照片在手机显示屏之外几乎无法使用。该软件不允许在广角镜头和主镜头之间进行多级变焦,而只能直接切换。

主摄像头可以以最高4K分辨率和60帧/秒的速度录制视频。亮度调节和自动对焦的反应非常迅速,而且适合光线情况,因此有可能创造良好的视频记录。

前置的2000万像素摄像头可以拍摄体面的自拍,可以放大一些而没有太大的质量损失。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Hauptkamera BlumeHauptkamera UmgebungHauptkamera Low Light
ColorChecker
16.8 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
14.6 ∆E
19.4 ∆E
12 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
15.5 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
12.6 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
11 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
13.1 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
13.1 ∆E
9 ∆E
1.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro: 9.87 ∆E min: 1.4 - max: 19.37 ∆E
ColorChecker
28.6 ∆E
48.3 ∆E
36.8 ∆E
34.3 ∆E
42 ∆E
57 ∆E
46.5 ∆E
30.9 ∆E
34.9 ∆E
27.3 ∆E
57 ∆E
58.8 ∆E
27.7 ∆E
41.6 ∆E
29.8 ∆E
64 ∆E
38.3 ∆E
39.7 ∆E
63.7 ∆E
64 ∆E
48 ∆E
35.3 ∆E
23.3 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro: 41.31 ∆E min: 13.46 - max: 64.04 ∆E

显示屏。AMOLED,144赫兹

子像素记录
子像素记录

该显示屏似乎与前代产品的面板相同 黑鲨4.测量值在这里和那里略有偏差,但这可能是由于新的SoC和修改的软件。

此外,AMOLED屏幕具有扩展的全高清分辨率,在需要时可以变得相对明亮。然而,我们无法用分光光度计测量小米指定的1300尼特的最大亮度,即使有一个小的照明显示区域。

640
cd/m²
637
cd/m²
622
cd/m²
639
cd/m²
642
cd/m²
633
cd/m²
635
cd/m²
645
cd/m²
638
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 645 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 636.8 cd/m² Minimum: 2.5 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 96 %
Center on Battery: 642 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.19 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.4
ΔE Greyscale 4.9 | 0.64-98 Ø5.6
96.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.22
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.67
Xiaomi Black Shark 4
Super AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.67
Asus ROG Phone 5s
AMOLED, 2448x1080, 6.78
Nubia RedMagic 7
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.80
Response Times
-30%
92%
127%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
6 ?(3, 3)
11 ?(5, 6)
-83%
2.4 ?(1.2, 1.2)
60%
0.912 ?(0.452, 0.461)
85%
Response Time Black / White *
8 ?(5, 3)
6 ?(3, 3)
25%
2.4 ?(1.2, 1.2)
70%
1.038 ?(0.521, 0.518)
87%
PWM Frequency
235
162.3
-31%
575 ?(73)
145%
729
210%
Screen
-14%
36%
1%
Brightness middle
642
676
5%
749
17%
683
6%
Brightness
637
669
5%
750
18%
685
8%
Brightness Distribution
96
98
2%
97
1%
95
-1%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
3.19
5.77
-81%
1.4
56%
3.6
-13%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
7.12
9.81
-38%
2.8
61%
6.7
6%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
4.9
3.7
24%
1.8
63%
5
-2%
Gamma
2.22 99%
1.959 112%
2.29 96%
2.14 103%
CCT
7671 85%
6584 99%
6602 98%
7537 86%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-22% / -19%
64% / 55%
64% / 43%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5 ms rise
↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 11 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (23.3 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3 ms rise
↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.692 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 8 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (36.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 235 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 235 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 235 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 21751 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

PWM频率
PWM频率
0% 亮度
0% 亮度
25%的亮度
25%的亮度
50%的亮度
50%的亮度
75%的亮度
75%的亮度
100%的亮度
100%的亮度

具有固定变焦水平和不同亮度设置的PWM测量系列

CalMAN灰度
CalMAN灰度
CalMAN颜色精度
CalMAN颜色精度
卡尔曼色彩空间sRGB
卡尔曼色彩空间sRGB
CalMAN饱和度
CalMAN饱和度

性能、排放和电池寿命:加热问题层出不穷

制造商依靠的是现代 Snapdragon 8 Gen.SoC作为高端芯片组的选择。事实上,在我们的基准测试中,黑鲨5 Pro在性能方面比其前代产品高出10-20%。快速内存的可用性也确保了系统的流畅性。

然而,黑鲨5 Pro在图形性能方面不能总是超越采用旧芯片组的对手。这可能是由于SoC发热很大,因此可能不得不快速节流,以避免过热的事实。

这可能解释了为什么在我们测试的游戏中无法达到60帧以上,即使在 "Shark Space "中启用了 "Ludicrous "性能模式。顺便说一下,黑鲨推荐为这种性能模式单独提供一个冷却器,它被放置在设备的中心位置。

如果需要,手机边缘的立体声扬声器可以变得非常响亮,并在游戏或听音乐时传播一种良好的情绪。体面的低中音确保了这一点--只有真正强调低音的部分听起来有点平淡。没有3.5毫米音频插孔,但可以用USB-C或蓝牙来连接耳机。该智能手机还可以通过目前所有可用的aptX编解码器进行无线通信。

这次的电池容量更持久一些,有4650毫安时,充电速度非常快,达到120瓦。 黑鲨4,这次包括了一个合适的120W充电器,将充电时间减少到30分钟以下。这款智能手机的续航时间也比前代产品长一些。很明显,黑鲨5 Pro是为性能而非电池寿命而设计的,但在我们的Wi-Fi测试中,12:32小时仍然是一个很好的耐力。

Geekbench 5.4
Single-Core (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1236 Points ∼99%
Xiaomi Black Shark 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
1002 Points ∼81% -19%
Asus ROG Phone 5s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
1156 Points ∼93% -6%
Nubia RedMagic 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 18432
1244 Points ∼100% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (1182 - 1298, n=17)
1234 Points ∼99% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (58 - 1755, n=258, last 2 years)
681 Points ∼55% -45%
Multi-Core (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
3742 Points ∼98%
Xiaomi Black Shark 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
3394 Points ∼89% -9%
Asus ROG Phone 5s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
3668 Points ∼96% -2%
Nubia RedMagic 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 18432
3813 Points ∼100% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (3269 - 3839, n=17)
3571 Points ∼94% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (248 - 4914, n=258, last 2 years)
2225 Points ∼58% -41%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
12578 Points ∼76%
Xiaomi Black Shark 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
16054 Points ∼97% +28%
Asus ROG Phone 5s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
16592 Points ∼100% +32%
Nubia RedMagic 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 18432
13295 Points ∼80% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (12062 - 17025, n=16)
13611 Points ∼82% +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4436 - 18567, n=150, last 2 years)
10174 Points ∼61% -19%
3DMark
Wild Life Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
10238 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Black Shark 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
4352 Points ∼43% -57%
Asus ROG Phone 5s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
5824 Points ∼57% -43%
Nubia RedMagic 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 18432
10185 Points ∼99% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (6483 - 10412, n=17)
9728 Points ∼95% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (205 - 11700, n=189, last 2 years)
3473 Points ∼34% -66%
Wild Life Extreme (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
2606 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Black Shark 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
1234 Points ∼47% -53%
Asus ROG Phone 5s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
1538 Points ∼59% -41%
Nubia RedMagic 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 18432
2604 Points ∼100% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (1629 - 2639, n=16)
2483 Points ∼95% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (22 - 3080, n=144, last 2 years)
1013 Points ∼39% -61%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
2534 Points ∼99%
Xiaomi Black Shark 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
1246 Points ∼49% -51%
Asus ROG Phone 5s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
1532 Points ∼60% -40%
Nubia RedMagic 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 18432
2549 Points ∼100% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (1567 - 2585, n=17)
2431 Points ∼95% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (101 - 2864, n=140, last 2 years)
999 Points ∼39% -61%
GFXBench
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
43 fps ∼48%
Xiaomi Black Shark 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
53 fps ∼60% +23%
Asus ROG Phone 5s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
65 fps ∼73% +51%
Nubia RedMagic 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 18432
89 fps ∼100% +107%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (38 - 98, n=16)
59.1 fps ∼66% +37%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.5 - 104, n=254, last 2 years)
29.4 fps ∼33% -32%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
60 fps ∼49%
Xiaomi Black Shark 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
61 fps ∼50% +2%
Asus ROG Phone 5s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
81 fps ∼66% +35%
Nubia RedMagic 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 18432
123 fps ∼100% +105%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (60 - 131, n=18)
98.8 fps ∼80% +65%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.9 - 136, n=255, last 2 years)
35.1 fps ∼29% -41%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
58 fps ∼97%
Xiaomi Black Shark 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
34 fps ∼57% -41%
Asus ROG Phone 5s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
41 fps ∼68% -29%
Nubia RedMagic 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 18432
60 fps ∼100% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (27 - 69, n=16)
45.1 fps ∼75% -22%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.1 - 69, n=255, last 2 years)
20.4 fps ∼34% -65%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
19 fps ∼40%
Xiaomi Black Shark 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
23 fps ∼49% +21%
Asus ROG Phone 5s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
30 fps ∼64% +58%
Nubia RedMagic 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 18432
47 fps ∼100% +147%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (19 - 49, n=18)
38.7 fps ∼82% +104%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.7 - 52, n=255, last 2 years)
13.4 fps ∼29% -29%
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 ProXiaomi Black Shark 4Asus ROG Phone 5sNubia RedMagic 7Average 256 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-30%
-23%
-17%
-26%
-58%
Sequential Read 256KB
1945.4
1663
-15%
1972
1%
1750
-10%
1781 ?(1330 - 2037, n=47)
-8%
938 ?(45.6 - 2037, n=248, last 2 years)
-52%
Sequential Write 256KB
1485.2
760
-49%
770
-48%
1260
-15%
954 ?(452 - 1559, n=47)
-36%
478 ?(11.9 - 1485, n=248, last 2 years)
-68%
Random Read 4KB
344.9
283.1
-18%
297.8
-14%
306.2
-11%
265 ?(181 - 345, n=47)
-23%
167.7 ?(13.5 - 345, n=248, last 2 years)
-51%
Random Write 4KB
424.8
259.9
-39%
287.2
-32%
282.5
-33%
274 ?(218 - 458, n=48)
-35%
161.4 ?(56.5 - 458, n=249, last 2 years)
-62%

Gaming Benchmarks

Armajet - Deathmatch, 4vs4, Magma, Bots only
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
56.9 (46min, 47.3P1 - 61max) fps ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
30 (28min - 31max) fps ∼53% -47%
PUBG Mobile
Smooth
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
59.8 (57min, 57.59P1 - 61max) fps ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
30 (26min - 31max) fps ∼50% -50%
HD
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
60 fps ∼100% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Snapdragon
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps ∼100% 0%
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
59.8 (57min, 58P1 - 61max) fps ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
30 (20min - 31max) fps ∼50% -50%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
30 (28min - 31max) fps ∼50% -50%
PUBG手机版
PUBG手机版
氩氦刀
氩氦刀

温度

Max. Load
 44.8 °C44.2 °C40.1 °C 
 46 °C45.4 °C40.1 °C 
 46 °C45.5 °C40.5 °C 
Maximum: 46 °C
Average: 43.6 °C
34.3 °C42.6 °C41.7 °C
37.9 °C44.6 °C45.1 °C
37.8 °C43.9 °C48.1 °C
Maximum: 48.1 °C
Average: 41.8 °C
Power Supply (max.)  41.2 °C | Room Temperature 21.6 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 43.6 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22 to 52.9 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48.1 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.3 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.


热力图前线
热力图前线
热力图 返回
热力图 返回

扬声器

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2039.242.12533.9393127304032.428.15036326330.928.38019.429.510019.939.112515.544.616015.949.920012.350.325012.955.731512.957.44009.960.250010.266.363013.468.68001773.8100014.275.5125012.877160011.776.6200010.276.4250011.676.13150137340001574.350001673.9630014.669.6800015.270.81000015.970.91250016.368.31600016.652.7SPL26.286.2N0.765.9median 14.2median 69.6Delta1.99.33534.23035.521.935.222.832.734.840.324.336.623.237.527.843.414.743.220.952.321.251.517.556.113.460.314.162.213.168.411.573.113.175.211.779.111.879.51380.812.181.712.181.912.382.912.579.91381.613.279.61371.413.767.213.563.314.26125.191.80.789.1median 13.1median 71.41.111.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Black Shark 5 ProNubia RedMagic 7
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 23%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 24% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Nubia RedMagic 7 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 23%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 38% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

电池寿命

Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro
4650 mAh
Xiaomi Black Shark 4
4500 mAh
Asus ROG Phone 5s
6000 mAh
Nubia RedMagic 7
4500 mAh
Average of class Smartphone
 
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
752
710
-6%
734
-2%
667
-11%
907 ?(438 - 1953, n=255, last 2 years)
21%
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
12h 32min

Pros

+ 加载速度非常快
+ 快速的内存
+ 可靠和快速的WLAN
+ 广泛的游戏软件
+ 良好的扬声器声音
+ 用于游戏和日常使用的肩部按钮

Cons

- 功能部分解释不清楚
- 强力加热
- 在许多游戏中最高60帧
- 没有IP认证的外壳
- 更新时间短

评定。伟大的游戏功能,但很少有超过60帧的画面

在审查中。小米黑鲨5 Pro。测试设备由黑鲨提供。
在审查中。小米黑鲨5 Pro。测试设备由黑鲨提供。

与前一代产品相比,黑鲨5 Pro看起来是一个犹豫不决的升级,它有新的装备,升级了的处理器,以及一个稍高的分辨率摄像头。在日常使用中,我们对快速存储、可靠的指纹传感器、良好的立体声扬声器和快速的Wi-Fi感到高兴。内部游戏模式 "鲨鱼空间 "为每个游戏提供了大量的设置。

我们不太热衷的是,在负载下有强烈的发热倾向,这也导致了性能损失。可选的风扇可以用来抵制一下。在许多方面,小米黑鲨5 Pro是一款相当普通的高端智能手机。外壳的稳定性可以更好,特别是对于这样一款昂贵的手机。有一个IP认证也是很好的。

黑鲨5 Pro是一款快速的游戏手机,但它不能总是显示其优势。

不仅是游戏玩家,普通用户也会对触发器感兴趣,它也可以被映射为日常的系统导航。然而,在软件方面,制造商需要澄清一些要点如何理解--对于这样一款昂贵的手机来说,更有规律的更新节奏会很好。此外,游戏中对144赫兹显示屏的支持仍然相当罕见。

像无线充电这样的功能在竞争者中是缺失的。 华硕ROG手机5s,但该手机有非常强大的扬声器,并提供大量的性能。努比亚 努比亚RedMagic 7也提供了额外的按键,但是是触摸式按键。

价格和可用性

小米黑鲨5 Pro可直接从起价为799欧元。黑鲨5 Pro也可在amazon.de也有。这些设备的价格与亚马逊运费相同。

Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro - 06/14/2022 v7
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
83%
Keyboard
69 / 75 → 92%
Pointing Device
96%
Connectivity
48 / 70 → 69%
Weight
88%
Battery
89%
Display
85%
Games Performance
60 / 64 → 94%
Application Performance
84 / 86 → 98%
Temperature
85%
Noise
100%
Audio
76 / 90 → 84%
Camera
71%
Average
80%
85%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 小米黑鲨5 Pro智能手机评测--最适合游戏的手机?
Florian Schmitt, 2022-06-19 (Update: 2022-06-19)