Notebookcheck Logo

努比亚红魔 9 Pro 评测--速度惊人、设计时尚的游戏手机

全速前进! 努比亚的 RedMagic 系列是不折不扣的性能、吸引人的设计和实用游戏功能的代名词。RedMagic 9 Pro 同样秉承了这一理念,并再次内置了风扇。请阅读我们的评测,了解它是否值得升级。
5G Android Gaming Smartphone Touchscreen
(照片:丹尼尔-施密特)
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro (RedMagic Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 8 x 2.3 - 3.3 GHz, Cortex-X4 / A720 / A720 / A520 (Kryo)
Graphics adapter
Memory
16 GB 
, LPDDR5x
Display
6.80 inch 20:9, 2480 x 1116 pixel 400 PPI, Capacitive, BOE Q9+, AMOLED, 2160 Hz PWM dimming, Corning Gorilla Glass, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash, 512 GB 
, 487.39 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: Audio jack (3.5 mm), USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, 520Hz touch sampling rate touchpads, OTG, Game Space Switch: Toggles special game mode on or off
Networking
Wi-Fi 7 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.3, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (Band C0, 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 19), LTE (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28A, 28B, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66), 5G-Sub6 (Band 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.9 x 163.98 x 76.35
Battery
6500 mAh Lithium-Ion
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 14
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (Samsung GN5, 1/1.57", OIS) 50 MPix (Ultra Wide, Samsung JN1, f/2.2, 0.64 µm) 2 MPix (f/2.4); Camera2-API-Level: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix (f/2.0)
Additional features
Speakers: Dual, Keyboard: On-screen, 80W charger, clear case, USB Cable, SIM ejector tool, RedMagic OS 9.0, 12 Months Warranty, RGB light: fully customisable lighting effects; 20,000 RPM high-speed turbofan; DRM Widevine L1; GNSS: GPS (L1, L5), Glonass (L1), Galileo (E1, E5a), BeiDou (B1, B1C, B2a); HDR: HLG, HDR10; DRM Widevine L1, fanless
Weight
229 g, Power Supply: 125 g
Price
799 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Bewertung
Datum
Modell
Gewicht
Laufwerk
Groesse
Aufloesung
Preis ab
86.8 %
02/2024
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
SD 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750
229 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.80"2480x1116
88.3 %
08/2023
Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro
SD 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740
228 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.80"2480x1116
87.4 %
01/2024
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
SD 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730
204 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.67"3200x1440
88.6 %
02/2024
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
SD 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750
225 g1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash6.78"2400x1080

外壳和功能 - 无缝观看体验

努比亚红魔 9 Pro 的外观棱角分明,让人想起前代产品的设计。该设备非常平衡,尽管相当重,但手感很好。它有 Sleet(黑色)、Cyclone(半透明背面)和 Snowfall(银白色)三种配色可供选择。

我们喜欢 9 Pro 的制造质量:手机上的所有缝隙都很小而且均匀。它再次采用了无缝显示屏,前置摄像头隐藏在面板下方。同时,显示屏下方的摄像头几乎看不见,只有在光线照射到显示屏的特定角度才能找到。后置摄像头与手机机身齐平--这在当今并不多见。它们同样被一块不明玻璃所覆盖。

这款游戏手机没有任何 IP 认证,但密封的 SIM 卡插槽表明至少有一些基本的防水溅保护。

在功能方面,这款手机与前代产品类似。在手机右侧,你会再次看到两个触摸式专用触发器。它们提供了良好的触觉反馈,在游戏过程中感觉非常灵敏。

集成的 USB 端口不仅能提供很高的数据传输速度(拷贝测试:635.9 MB/s),还支持通过线缆进行视频输出。这意味着您可以轻松镜像屏幕或加载桌面版 RedMagic Game Space(最高全高清和 144Hz)。

(照片:丹尼尔-施密特)
(照片:丹尼尔-施密特)
(照片:丹尼尔-施密特)
(照片:丹尼尔-施密特)
(照片:丹尼尔-施密特)
(照片:丹尼尔-施密特)
(照片:丹尼尔-施密特)

尺寸比较

163.98 mm 76.35 mm 9.47 mm 228 g163.98 mm 76.35 mm 8.9 mm 229 g163.8 mm 76.8 mm 8.9 mm 225 g162.78 mm 75.44 mm 8.59 mm 204 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

连接、软件和操作

努比亚红魔 9 Pro 支持所有常规移动通信标准,频率覆盖范围广。通过 Wi-Fi 7 以及 5.0 GHz 和 6.0 GHz 两个频率范围,无线局域网连接非常迅速和稳定。

只要将手机贴在耳边,就能获得不错的语音质量。不过,噪音抑制效果一般,RedMagic 在扬声器模式下听起来略有回音。

操作系统方面,该手机配备了Android 14 和努比亚的 RedMagic OS 9.0 定制 UI。在审查时,安全补丁的日期是 2023 年 11 月 1 日,因此不再是完全最新的。根据经验,更新只会零星推出。努比亚只承诺提供一次重大更新和两年的安全补丁。

生物识别安全由显示屏内的光学指纹扫描仪处理,该扫描仪工作正常,还能测量心率。此外,您还可以通过前置摄像头进行面部识别,但这种方法的安全性较低。

除了两个额外的电容式肩部触发器外,边框上还有一个醒目的红色按钮,可以让你切换到手机上的特殊游戏界面:RedMagic Game Space。通过它,用户可以自定义各个游戏的设置,并管理任何配对的配件。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
1801 (1553min - 1882max) MBit/s
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
1716 (1119min - 1807max) MBit/s -5%
Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro
979 (959min - 999max) MBit/s -46%
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
941 (475min - 989max) MBit/s -48%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
1660 (1500min - 1710max) MBit/s
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
1573 (1358min - 1639max) MBit/s -5%
Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro
988 (487min - 993max) MBit/s -40%
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
815 (767min - 825max) MBit/s -51%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
1738 (1597min - 1857max) MBit/s +1%
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
1734 (1577min - 1828max) MBit/s +1%
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
1716 (829min - 1880max) MBit/s
Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro
1639 (824min - 1697max) MBit/s -4%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro
1689 (1571min - 1722max) MBit/s +5%
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
1613 (654min - 1703max) MBit/s
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
1505 (659min - 1568max) MBit/s -7%
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
1153 (847min - 1341max) MBit/s -29%

Legend

 
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 750, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
 
Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Qualcomm Adreno 740, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
 
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
 
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 750, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
095190285380475570665760855950104511401235133014251520161517101805Tooltip
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 750; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1688 (829-1880)
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 750; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1734 (1577-1828)
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 750; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1588 (654-1703)
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 750; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1482 (659-1568)
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 750; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1657 (1500-1710)
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 750; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø814 (767-825)
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 750; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1801 (1553-1882)
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 750; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø925 (475-989)

摄像头:双摄像头更好,前置摄像头较弱

使用 RedMagic 9 Pro 拍摄的自拍照
使用 RedMagic 9 Pro 拍摄的自拍照

前置摄像头没有什么变化。显示屏下方的摄像头具有美颜模式,但即使禁用该功能,图像看起来仍然浑浊且缺乏细节。在弱光环境下,照片的噪点也会很快变多。

现在的主摄像头模块比上一代产品少了一个镜头。广角传感器与 红魔 8S Pro但现在具有光学图像稳定(OIS)功能。第二个镜头也有 5000 万像素,可用于拍摄超广角和微距图像。虽然没有光学变焦,但该手机能够实现高达 10 倍的数码变焦。使用 RedMagic 9 Pro 拍摄的照片具有不错的细节,但看起来有些冲淡和暗淡。

主摄像头可以录制高达 8K(30 帧/秒)的视频,前置摄像头可以录制全高清(30 帧/秒)视频。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main cameraMain cameraUltra-wide angle5x zoomLow-light
click to load images
ColorChecker
11.4 ∆E
6 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
11.6 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
9 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
5 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
1.2 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
2.2 ∆E
4 ∆E
8 ∆E
ColorChecker Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro: 6.42 ∆E min: 1.2 - max: 11.56 ∆E
ColorChecker
27.7 ∆E
46.9 ∆E
35.5 ∆E
33.4 ∆E
39.3 ∆E
54.3 ∆E
45.8 ∆E
29.8 ∆E
33.5 ∆E
26.2 ∆E
56.2 ∆E
56.2 ∆E
26.5 ∆E
43 ∆E
29 ∆E
64.3 ∆E
35.5 ∆E
38.8 ∆E
68.9 ∆E
64.5 ∆E
48.5 ∆E
35 ∆E
22.8 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro: 40.61 ∆E min: 12.89 - max: 68.94 ∆E

显示屏 - RedMagic 9 Pro 采用明亮的 AMOLED 显示屏

子像素结构
子像素结构

就一般规格而言,RedMagic 9 Pro 的显示屏与上一代产品相比没有变化:它是一块 6.8 英寸全高清+面板,刷新率高达 120Hz。不过,色彩准确度和亮度得到了进一步提高。

在启用环境光传感器后,AMOLED 显示屏的平均峰值亮度达到 1,031 cd/m²,同时显示完全白色的图像。当亮区和暗区均匀分布时(APL 18),面板亮度甚至达到了 1,242 cd/m²。在播放 HDR 时也达到了类似的水平。显示屏的手动最大亮度为 589 cd/m²。

与所有 OLED 面板一样,RedMagic 9 Pro 的屏幕也无法避免闪烁现象。不过,努比亚采用了 2160Hz 的高频 PWM 调光技术,使显示屏尽可能舒适。

1012
cd/m²
1023
cd/m²
1048
cd/m²
1017
cd/m²
1035
cd/m²
1054
cd/m²
1011
cd/m²
1036
cd/m²
1042
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
BOE Q9+ tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 1054 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1030.9 cd/m² Minimum: 3.32 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 96 %
Center on Battery: 1035 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 1.6 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
99.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.25
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
BOE Q9+, AMOLED, 2480x1116, 6.80
Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro
AMOLED, 2480x1116, 6.80
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
AMOLED, 3200x1440, 6.67
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
OLED, 2400x1080, 6.78
Response Times
-77%
20%
218%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
0.8 ?(0.4015, 0.401)
2.06 ?(1.027, 1.03)
-158%
1.09 ?(0.527, 0.5615)
-36%
1.18 ?(0.5235, 0.655)
-48%
Response Time Black / White *
1.08 ?(0.539, 0.5365)
1.88 ?(1.065, 0.819)
-74%
1.13 ?(0.569, 0.559)
-5%
1.14 ?(0.6525, 0.483)
-6%
PWM Frequency
60
60
0%
120.3
101%
485
708%
Screen
-21%
6%
-30%
Brightness middle
1035
775
-25%
1002
-3%
1699
64%
Brightness
1031
778
-25%
1004
-3%
1698
65%
Brightness Distribution
96
98
2%
95
-1%
98
2%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1
1.3
-30%
0.8
20%
1.9
-90%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
1.9
2.4
-26%
1.7
11%
4.7
-147%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.6
1.9
-19%
1.4
12%
2.8
-75%
Gamma
2.25 98%
2.28 96%
2.23 99%
2.26 97%
CCT
6368 102%
6693 97%
6468 100%
6648 98%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-49% / -39%
13% / 11%
94% / 53%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
1.08 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.539 ms rise
↘ 0.5365 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
0.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.4015 ms rise
↘ 0.401 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 60 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 60 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 60 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17903 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

最低显示亮度
分钟
25% 显示屏亮度
25%
50% 显示亮度
50%
75 % 显示功能
75 %
最大程度的手动显示功能
100 %
灰度(色彩模式:标准,色温:正常,目标色域:DCI-P3)
灰度(色彩模式:标准,色温:正常,目标色域:DCI-P3)
ColorChecker(色彩模式:标准,色温:正常,目标色域:DCI-P3)
ColorChecker(色彩模式:标准,色温:正常,目标色域:DCI-P3)
色彩空间(色彩模式:标准,色温:正常,目标色域:DCI-P3)
色彩空间(色彩模式:标准,色温:正常,目标色域:DCI-P3)
饱和度(色彩模式:标准,色温:正常,目标色域:DCI-P3)
饱和度(色彩模式:标准,色温:正常,目标色域:DCI-P3)
RedMagic 9 Pro 户外(照片:Daniel Schmidt)
RedMagic 9 Pro 户外版
RedMagic 9 Pro 的视角(摄影:Daniel Schmidt)
RedMagic 9 Pro 的视角

性能、排放和电池寿命

努比亚红魔 9 Pro 是全球首批搭载 高通骁龙 8 代 3.内置风扇的运行噪音(最大 39 dB(A))甚至低于 8S Pro。 8S Pro内置风扇的运行噪音比 8S Pro 更低(最大 39 分贝(A)),使手机能够在大部分时间内保持处理器在峰值性能下稳定运行。

在浏览器基准测试中,我们注意到 RedMagic 手机和 Chrome 浏览器的配合并不默契。在使用谷歌浏览器时,结果出奇的差。而当我们使用微软 Edge 浏览器时,情况就不同了。

我们运行了 Burnout 基准测试(CPU + GPU)来模拟高负荷运行。大约十分钟后,RedMagic 9 Pro 就崩溃了,需要重新启动。尽管有风扇,但设备还是过热了。因此,在仅启用 CPU 负载的情况下进行了后续测量。即便如此,游戏手机还是变得非常热。

RedMagic 9 Pro 的两个扬声器音量非常大,但在中等音量下听起来已经很刺耳和空洞。

努比亚手机真正的亮点在于电池续航时间。它的电池容量高达 6,500 毫安时,在我们的 Wi-Fi 测试中可以持续使用 17 个小时。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1687 Points +7%
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 24576
1672 Points +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (1575 - 1702, n=10)
1672 Points +6%
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
1575 Points
Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
1574 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1266 Points -20%
Average of class Smartphone
  (119 - 2138, n=220, last 2 years)
911 Points -42%
Multi-Core
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
6439 Points +19%
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 24576
6415 Points +19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (5393 - 6543, n=10)
6103 Points +13%
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
5393 Points
Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
5129 Points -5%
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
3965 Points -26%
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 6681, n=220, last 2 years)
2988 Points -45%
Geekbench 6.2
Single-Core
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 24576
2318 Points +2%
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 24576
2258 Points -1%
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
2278 Points 0%
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
2270 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (2127 - 2329, n=12)
2238 Points -1%
Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
2104 Points -7%
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1741 Points -23%
Average of class Smartphone
  (193 - 2930, n=105, last 2 years)
1390 Points -39%
Multi-Core
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 24576
7357 Points +3%
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 24576
7193 Points +1%
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
7151 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (6432 - 7501, n=12)
6991 Points -2%
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
6875 Points -4%
Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
5648 Points -21%
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
4346 Points -39%
Average of class Smartphone
  (845 - 7408, n=105, last 2 years)
3840 Points -46%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 24576
21385 Points +2%
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
20943 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (15343 - 21628, n=11)
18565 Points -11%
Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
17399 Points -17%
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
15876 Points -24%
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
15774 Points -25%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4761 - 21385, n=215, last 2 years)
11771 Points -44%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 24576
2162423 Points 0%
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
2157865 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (1624507 - 2162423, n=11)
2005548 Points -7%
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1905751 Points -12%
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1308217 Points -39%
Average of class Smartphone
  (281399 - 2162423, n=51, last 2 years)
1249818 Points -42%
3DMark
Wild Life Unlimited Score
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 24576
19690 Points +1%
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
19566 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (16691 - 19690, n=9)
19122 Points -2%
Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
14737 Points -25%
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
8294 Points -58%
Average of class Smartphone
  (394 - 20068, n=204, last 2 years)
6251 Points -68%
Wild Life Extreme
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 24576
5226 Points +2%
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
5143 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (4744 - 5338, n=10)
5066 Points -1%
Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
3935 Points -23%
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
2121 Points -59%
Average of class Smartphone
  (22 - 5226, n=208, last 2 years)
1682 Points -67%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 24576
5185 Points +1%
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
5150 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (4690 - 5190, n=9)
4995 Points -3%
Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
3900 Points -24%
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
2079 Points -60%
Average of class Smartphone
  (110 - 5248, n=202, last 2 years)
1698 Points -67%
Solar Bay Score
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 24576
8655 Points 0%
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
8648 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (7523 - 8720, n=10)
8375 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3332 - 8774, n=30, last 2 years)
6464 Points -25%
Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
5700 Points -34%
Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 24576
8672 Points 0%
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
8668 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (7523 - 8758, n=9)
8527 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3229 - 8765, n=30, last 2 years)
6469 Points -25%
Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
5669 Points -35%
GFXBench
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
109 fps +82%
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
101 fps +68%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (60 - 121, n=10)
90 fps +50%
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 24576
61 fps +2%
Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
60 fps 0%
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
60 fps
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.6 - 123, n=227, last 2 years)
43.9 fps -27%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
209 fps +29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (92 - 241, n=11)
192.5 fps +19%
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 24576
183 fps +13%
Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
165 fps +2%
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
162 fps
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
126 fps -22%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.3 - 229, n=227, last 2 years)
64 fps -60%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
76 fps +27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (60 - 119, n=10)
74.5 fps +24%
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
63 fps +5%
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 24576
61 fps +2%
Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
60 fps 0%
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
60 fps
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.8 - 119, n=227, last 2 years)
32.7 fps -45%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
85 fps +33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (43 - 96, n=12)
78.1 fps +22%
Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
72 fps +13%
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 24576
68 fps +6%
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
64 fps
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
48 fps -25%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 94, n=227, last 2 years)
25.5 fps -60%
3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288 (vulkan 1.0)
39 fps +3%
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
38 fps
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (32 - 42, n=10)
37.8 fps -1%
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 24576
37 fps -3%
Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
33 fps -13%
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
22 fps -42%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.38 - 42, n=214, last 2 years)
12.5 fps -67%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384 (Edge 120)
70135 Points
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384 (Chrome 120)
25953 Points -63%
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 24576 (Edge 121.0.2277.84)
63669 Points -9%
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288 (Chrome 120.0.6099.115)
55611 Points -21%
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288 (Chrome 120)
54365 Points -22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (25953 - 70135, n=11)
54354 Points -23%
Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384 (Edge 115)
52492 Points -25%
Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384 (Chrome 115)
19870 Points -72%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2228 - 89112, n=214, last 2 years)
33357 Points -52%

Basemark GPUScore

0102030405060708090100110120130Tooltip
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro; GPUScore: The Expedition; 2560x1440 Official; 0.9.1 Vulkan 1.0: Ø58.9 (15.2-100.4)
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro; GPUScore: The Expedition; Official Native; 0.9.1 Vulkan 1.0: Ø71.5 (17.9-136.2)
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro; GPUScore: Sacred Path; 2560x1440 Official; 0.9.1 Vulkan 1.0: Ø13.9 (9.4-22)
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro; GPUScore: Sacred Path; Official Native; 0.9.1 Vulkan 1.0: Ø16.9 (10.9-48.7)
Nubia RedMagic 9 ProNubia RedMagic 8S ProXiaomi Poco F5 ProAsus ROG Phone 8 ProAverage 512 GB UFS 4.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-19%
-42%
-3%
-11%
-59%
Sequential Read 256KB
4164.08
3576.35
-14%
1876.8
-55%
4016.67
-4%
3712 ?(2451 - 4512, n=19)
-11%
Sequential Write 256KB
3199.98
2682.03
-16%
1773.94
-45%
3153.4
-1%
Random Read 4KB
442.82
369.76
-16%
342.04
-23%
434.63
-2%
Random Write 4KB
691.17
479.52
-31%
372.35
-46%
648
-6%

温度

Max. Load
 54.7 °C54.2 °C51.1 °C 
 55 °C55.1 °C52.2 °C 
 54.7 °C53.9 °C53.3 °C 
Maximum: 55.1 °C
Average: 53.8 °C
45 °C50 °C49.1 °C
47.7 °C48.5 °C41.6 °C
48.3 °C50.4 °C51.6 °C
Maximum: 51.6 °C
Average: 48 °C
Power Supply (max.)  26.9 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 53.8 °C / 129 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 55.1 °C / 131 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 51.6 °C / 125 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.5 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.


3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

0102030405060708090100110Tooltip
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø30.2 (29.2-31)
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø29.5 (28.4-31.3)
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø26.9 (24.5-31)
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø109.7 (102.5-112.2)
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø105.8 (103.3-111.5)
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø96.1 (86.1-111.7)
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø117.1 (117-117.1)
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø28.8 (28.8-28.9)
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø26.6 (24.1-28.9)
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø29.2 (29.1-29.2)
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø26.7 (24.3-29.1)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.638.42524.739.8312440.14024.641.45032.143.2632242.88016.441.31002644.712519.846.216015.651.320014.655.825011.159.53158.260.340011.565.65009.975.36308.477.580010.278.310001180.1125013.478.8160012.177.520001281.5250012.383.1315012.483.940001381.5500013.177630013.874.6800013.771.1100001470.71250013.765.51600012.853.4SPL24.791.7N0.689.1median 12.8median 75.3Delta1.510.528.636.125.934.523.435.627.335.936.238.725.44016.644.216.946.614.747.213.152.315.154.714.357.311.661.91061.19.167.611.168.79.173.111.875.81576.911.377.51281.212.383.212.784.912.683.813.179.713.47813.577.113.574.513.663.713.657.324.792.20.687.8median 13.1median 74.51.39.9hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseNubia RedMagic 9 ProAsus ROG Phone 8 Pro
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 24% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (92.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.1% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 8% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 27% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
6500 mAh
1036 min
Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro
6000 mAh
1026 min -1%
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
5160 mAh
960 min -7%
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
5500 mAh
929 min -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (424 - 2844, n=229, last 2 years)
914 min -12%
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 120)
17h 16min

Pros

+ 明亮、精确、快速的显示
+ 高性能
+ 附加触摸传感器
+ 电池寿命长

Cons

- 温度会很高
- 更新支持期短
- 无 IP 认证
- 无无线充电功能

判决

评测努比亚红魔9 Pro。评测机由努比亚友情提供。  (照片:丹尼尔-施密特)
评测努比亚红魔9 Pro。评测机由努比亚友情提供。

努比亚红魔 9 Pro 与前代产品 8S Pro 相比略有进步。 8S Pro.可配置的 LED 灯和额外的肩部按键等熟悉的亮点再次登场,且基本保持不变。除了采用最新的高通 SoC 外,这款游戏手机还提供了更亮的显示屏、更安静的风扇和更大的电池。新的摄像头设置也得到了改进。此外,这款手机现在的充电功率可达 80 瓦。

RedMagic 9 Pro 是一款功能强大、价格便宜的游戏手机。但它会变得非常热。

虽然风扇现在能更安静地运转是件好事,但在我们的压力测试中,散热解决方案还不足以防止手机关机。努比亚最好能稍微降低 SoC 的运行速度,而不是一味追求高性能。虽然游戏时过热不是问题,但表面温度可能会很高。

此外,该机还缺少一些功能,如无线充电和 IP 认证,鉴于产品的重点,这两项功能都可以忽略不计。不过,这个价位的设备应该支持 eSIM 卡。

华硕 ROG Phone 8 Pro 是 RedMagic 9 Pro 最强劲的竞争对手。如果你主要关注的是性能,其他高端智能手机可能同样是你的不错选择,尤其是努比亚 Z60 Ultra。

价格和供应情况

努比亚红魔 9 Pro 有三种配置可供选择:

颜色 内存/存储 价格 (RRP)
Sleet 12/256 GB 649 欧元/649 美元
旋风 16/512 GB €799/US$799
Snowfall 16/512 GB €799/US$799

所有型号均可直接从制造商网站订购亚马逊网站订购。

Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro - 02/05/2024 v7
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis
83%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
93%
Connectivity
64 / 70 → 92%
Weight
88%
Battery
92%
Display
93%
Games Performance
81 / 64 → 100%
Application Performance
96 / 86 → 100%
Temperature
37%
Noise
70%
Audio
78 / 90 → 87%
Average
79%
87%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Transparency

The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 努比亚红魔 9 Pro 评测--速度惊人、设计时尚的游戏手机
Daniel Schmidt, 2024-02- 7 (Update: 2024-02- 7)