努比亚红魔 9 Pro 评测--速度惊人、设计时尚的游戏手机
潜在的竞争对手比较
Bewertung | Datum | Modell | Gewicht | Laufwerk | Groesse | Aufloesung | Preis ab |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
86.8 % | 02/2024 | Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro SD 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750 | 229 g | 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 6.80" | 2480x1116 | |
88.3 % | 08/2023 | Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro SD 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740 | 228 g | 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 6.80" | 2480x1116 | |
87.4 % | 01/2024 | Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro SD 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730 | 204 g | 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.67" | 3200x1440 | |
88.6 % | 02/2024 | Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro SD 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750 | 225 g | 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash | 6.78" | 2400x1080 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
外壳和功能 - 无缝观看体验
努比亚红魔 9 Pro 的外观棱角分明,让人想起前代产品的设计。该设备非常平衡,尽管相当重,但手感很好。它有 Sleet(黑色)、Cyclone(半透明背面)和 Snowfall(银白色)三种配色可供选择。
我们喜欢 9 Pro 的制造质量:手机上的所有缝隙都很小而且均匀。它再次采用了无缝显示屏,前置摄像头隐藏在面板下方。同时,显示屏下方的摄像头几乎看不见,只有在光线照射到显示屏的特定角度才能找到。后置摄像头与手机机身齐平--这在当今并不多见。它们同样被一块不明玻璃所覆盖。
这款游戏手机没有任何 IP 认证,但密封的 SIM 卡插槽表明至少有一些基本的防水溅保护。
在功能方面,这款手机与前代产品类似。在手机右侧,你会再次看到两个触摸式专用触发器。它们提供了良好的触觉反馈,在游戏过程中感觉非常灵敏。
集成的 USB 端口不仅能提供很高的数据传输速度(拷贝测试:635.9 MB/s),还支持通过线缆进行视频输出。这意味着您可以轻松镜像屏幕或加载桌面版 RedMagic Game Space(最高全高清和 144Hz)。
连接、软件和操作
努比亚红魔 9 Pro 支持所有常规移动通信标准,频率覆盖范围广。通过 Wi-Fi 7 以及 5.0 GHz 和 6.0 GHz 两个频率范围,无线局域网连接非常迅速和稳定。
只要将手机贴在耳边,就能获得不错的语音质量。不过,噪音抑制效果一般,RedMagic 在扬声器模式下听起来略有回音。
操作系统方面,该手机配备了Android 14 和努比亚的 RedMagic OS 9.0 定制 UI。在审查时,安全补丁的日期是 2023 年 11 月 1 日,因此不再是完全最新的。根据经验,更新只会零星推出。努比亚只承诺提供一次重大更新和两年的安全补丁。
生物识别安全由显示屏内的光学指纹扫描仪处理,该扫描仪工作正常,还能测量心率。此外,您还可以通过前置摄像头进行面部识别,但这种方法的安全性较低。
除了两个额外的电容式肩部触发器外,边框上还有一个醒目的红色按钮,可以让你切换到手机上的特殊游戏界面:RedMagic Game Space。通过它,用户可以自定义各个游戏的设置,并管理任何配对的配件。
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro | |
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro | |
Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro | |
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro | |
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro | |
Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro | |
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro | |
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro | |
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro | |
Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro | |
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro | |
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro | |
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro |
摄像头:双摄像头更好,前置摄像头较弱
前置摄像头没有什么变化。显示屏下方的摄像头具有美颜模式,但即使禁用该功能,图像看起来仍然浑浊且缺乏细节。在弱光环境下,照片的噪点也会很快变多。
现在的主摄像头模块比上一代产品少了一个镜头。广角传感器与 红魔 8S Pro但现在具有光学图像稳定(OIS)功能。第二个镜头也有 5000 万像素,可用于拍摄超广角和微距图像。虽然没有光学变焦,但该手机能够实现高达 10 倍的数码变焦。使用 RedMagic 9 Pro 拍摄的照片具有不错的细节,但看起来有些冲淡和暗淡。
主摄像头可以录制高达 8K(30 帧/秒)的视频,前置摄像头可以录制全高清(30 帧/秒)视频。
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main cameraMain cameraUltra-wide angle5x zoomLow-light显示屏 - RedMagic 9 Pro 采用明亮的 AMOLED 显示屏
就一般规格而言,RedMagic 9 Pro 的显示屏与上一代产品相比没有变化:它是一块 6.8 英寸全高清+面板,刷新率高达 120Hz。不过,色彩准确度和亮度得到了进一步提高。
在启用环境光传感器后,AMOLED 显示屏的平均峰值亮度达到 1,031 cd/m²,同时显示完全白色的图像。当亮区和暗区均匀分布时(APL 18),面板亮度甚至达到了 1,242 cd/m²。在播放 HDR 时也达到了类似的水平。显示屏的手动最大亮度为 589 cd/m²。
与所有 OLED 面板一样,RedMagic 9 Pro 的屏幕也无法避免闪烁现象。不过,努比亚采用了 2160Hz 的高频 PWM 调光技术,使显示屏尽可能舒适。
|
Brightness Distribution: 96 %
Center on Battery: 1035 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 1.6 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
99.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.25
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro BOE Q9+, AMOLED, 2480x1116, 6.80 | Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro AMOLED, 2480x1116, 6.80 | Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro AMOLED, 3200x1440, 6.67 | Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro OLED, 2400x1080, 6.78 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Response Times | -77% | 20% | 218% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 0.8 ? | 2.06 ? -158% | 1.09 ? -36% | 1.18 ? -48% |
Response Time Black / White * | 1.08 ? | 1.88 ? -74% | 1.13 ? -5% | 1.14 ? -6% |
PWM Frequency | 60 | 60 0% | 120.3 101% | 485 708% |
Screen | -21% | 6% | -30% | |
Brightness middle | 1035 | 775 -25% | 1002 -3% | 1699 64% |
Brightness | 1031 | 778 -25% | 1004 -3% | 1698 65% |
Brightness Distribution | 96 | 98 2% | 95 -1% | 98 2% |
Black Level * | ||||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1 | 1.3 -30% | 0.8 20% | 1.9 -90% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 1.9 | 2.4 -26% | 1.7 11% | 4.7 -147% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.6 | 1.9 -19% | 1.4 12% | 2.8 -75% |
Gamma | 2.25 98% | 2.28 96% | 2.23 99% | 2.26 97% |
CCT | 6368 102% | 6693 97% | 6468 100% | 6648 98% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -49% /
-39% | 13% /
11% | 94% /
53% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
1.08 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.539 ms rise | |
↘ 0.5365 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
0.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.4015 ms rise | |
↘ 0.401 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 60 Hz | ||
The display backlight flickers at 60 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 60 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17903 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
性能、排放和电池寿命
努比亚红魔 9 Pro 是全球首批搭载 高通骁龙 8 代 3.内置风扇的运行噪音(最大 39 dB(A))甚至低于 8S Pro。 8S Pro内置风扇的运行噪音比 8S Pro 更低(最大 39 分贝(A)),使手机能够在大部分时间内保持处理器在峰值性能下稳定运行。
在浏览器基准测试中,我们注意到 RedMagic 手机和 Chrome 浏览器的配合并不默契。在使用谷歌浏览器时,结果出奇的差。而当我们使用微软 Edge 浏览器时,情况就不同了。
我们运行了 Burnout 基准测试(CPU + GPU)来模拟高负荷运行。大约十分钟后,RedMagic 9 Pro 就崩溃了,需要重新启动。尽管有风扇,但设备还是过热了。因此,在仅启用 CPU 负载的情况下进行了后续测量。即便如此,游戏手机还是变得非常热。
RedMagic 9 Pro 的两个扬声器音量非常大,但在中等音量下听起来已经很刺耳和空洞。
努比亚手机真正的亮点在于电池续航时间。它的电池容量高达 6,500 毫安时,在我们的 Wi-Fi 测试中可以持续使用 17 个小时。
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro (Edge 120) | |
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro (Chrome 120) | |
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro (Edge 121.0.2277.84) | |
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro (Chrome 120.0.6099.115) | |
Xiaomi 14 Pro (Chrome 120) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (25953 - 70135, n=11) | |
Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro (Edge 115) | |
Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro (Chrome 115) | |
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 89112, n=214, last 2 years) |
Basemark GPUScore
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro | Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro | Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro | Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro | Average 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | -19% | -42% | -3% | -11% | -59% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 4164.08 | 3576.35 -14% | 1876.8 -55% | 4016.67 -4% | 3712 ? -11% | 1508 ? -64% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 3199.98 | 2682.03 -16% | 1773.94 -45% | 3153.4 -1% | 3042 ? -5% | 1118 ? -65% |
Random Read 4KB | 442.82 | 369.76 -16% | 342.04 -23% | 434.63 -2% | 416 ? -6% | 247 ? -44% |
Random Write 4KB | 691.17 | 479.52 -31% | 372.35 -46% | 648 -6% | 530 ? -23% | 272 ? -61% |
温度
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 55.1 °C / 131 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 51.6 °C / 125 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.5 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.
3DMark Wild Life Stress Test
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 24% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (92.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.1% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 8% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 27% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing | |
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro | |
Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro | |
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro | |
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro | |
Average of class Smartphone (424 - 2844, n=229, last 2 years) |
Pros
Cons
判决
努比亚红魔 9 Pro 与前代产品 8S Pro 相比略有进步。 8S Pro.可配置的 LED 灯和额外的肩部按键等熟悉的亮点再次登场,且基本保持不变。除了采用最新的高通 SoC 外,这款游戏手机还提供了更亮的显示屏、更安静的风扇和更大的电池。新的摄像头设置也得到了改进。此外,这款手机现在的充电功率可达 80 瓦。
RedMagic 9 Pro 是一款功能强大、价格便宜的游戏手机。但它会变得非常热。
虽然风扇现在能更安静地运转是件好事,但在我们的压力测试中,散热解决方案还不足以防止手机关机。努比亚最好能稍微降低 SoC 的运行速度,而不是一味追求高性能。虽然游戏时过热不是问题,但表面温度可能会很高。
此外,该机还缺少一些功能,如无线充电和 IP 认证,鉴于产品的重点,这两项功能都可以忽略不计。不过,这个价位的设备应该支持 eSIM 卡。
华硕 ROG Phone 8 Pro 是 RedMagic 9 Pro 最强劲的竞争对手。如果你主要关注的是性能,其他高端智能手机可能同样是你的不错选择,尤其是努比亚 Z60 Ultra。
价格和供应情况
努比亚红魔 9 Pro 有三种配置可供选择:
颜色 | 内存/存储 | 价格 (RRP) |
---|---|---|
Sleet | 12/256 GB | 649 欧元/649 美元 |
旋风 | 16/512 GB | €799/US$799 |
Snowfall | 16/512 GB | €799/US$799 |
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
-
02/05/2024 v7
Daniel Schmidt
Transparency
The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.