Notebookcheck Logo

努比亚RedMagic 7S Pro评测--集成风扇和UDC的游戏智能手机

众多的超级名词。 RedMagic 7S Pro是一个纯种的游戏机,它不仅配备了快速的SoC,而且还承诺了高帧率和采样率。额外的感应键应该可以改善游戏体验,而集成风扇可以保持帧的稳定。直接打击?
5G Gaming Smartphone Touchscreen Android
Nubia RedMagic 7S Pro (RedMagic Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 8 x 1.8 - 3.2 GHz, Cortex-X2 / A710 / A510 (Kryo) Waipio
Graphics adapter
Memory
12 GB 
Display
6.80 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 387 PPI, capacitive, AMOLED, 480 Hz up to 960 Hz Touch Sampling Rate, DC Dimming, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 256 GB 
, 211 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, Audio Connections: USB-C and Audio Jack (3.5 mm), 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: G-Sensor, Electronic Compass, Gyroscope, Proximity, Sensor hub, Shoulder Trigger Buttons: 520 Hz touch sampling rate
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.2, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (Band 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, BC0, BC1), LTE (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28A, 34, 38, 40, 41, 66), 5G-Sub6 (Band 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 41, 77, 78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 9.98 x 166.27 x 77.1
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Ion
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 12
Camera
Primary Camera: 64 MPix (Samsung S5KGW3, f/1.79, 82°, 6P, 1/1.97", 0.7 µm) + 8 MPix (Ultra Wide, HI846, f/2.2, 120°, 5P, 1/4", 1.12 µm) + 2 MPix (OV02A10, f/2.4, 78°, 3P, 1/5", 1.75 Mm); 8k-Video, Camera2-API-Level: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix (UDC, f/2.0, 1.12 µm)
Additional features
Speakers: Dual, Keyboard: Onscreen, 65W-Charger, USB-Cabel (2x Type-C), SIM-Tool, Clear Case, Page of Mora Sticker, RedMagic OS 5.5, 12 Months Warranty, GNSS: GPS (L1, L5), Glonass (L1), Galileo (E1, E5a), BeiDou (B1, B2a, B1C), NavIC (L5); SAR: N/A
Weight
235 g, Power Supply: 131 g
Price
779 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
84.9 %
09/2022
Nubia RedMagic 7S Pro
SD 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730
235 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.80"2400x1080
89.5 %
08/2022
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro
SD 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730
239 g512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.78"2448x1080
85.7 %
06/2022
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro
SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730
220 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.67"2400x1080
85 %
03/2022
Nubia RedMagic 7
SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730
226 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.80"2400x1080

外壳和功能 - RedMagic 7S Pro的960 Hz采样率

努比亚RedMagic 7S Pro有三种设计。黑曜石、超新星和水星。这三个变体在视觉上和内存配置上都有所不同。最便宜的黑曜石型号(779欧元/~780美元,我们的评测样品)提供了一个略微减少的配置,没有可见的LED风扇。Mercury(949欧元/~950美元)看起来非常相似,但提供了一个发光风扇的小窗口和慷慨的18GB内存和512GB内部存储。Supernova(949欧元)在功能上与Mercury相同,但有一个明亮的、灰色的设计。

这款智能手机的制造质量真的很好。缝隙均匀而紧密。材料手感也很好,只是按键有一点跳动,这有点破坏了良好的印象。RedMagic智能手机的感应键很容易被感觉到,是对游戏控制的有益补充。对面的滑动按钮使智能手机进入具有自己界面的游戏模式,通过它可以直接进入游戏,并可以单独调整设置。增加的960赫兹采样率必须首先在设置中启用,否则触摸屏只能在480赫兹下工作。这里还可以找到对后部LED的控制。

尺寸比较

173 mm 77 mm 10.3 mm 239 g170.57 mm 78.33 mm 9.5 mm 226 g166.27 mm 77.1 mm 9.98 mm 235 g163.9 mm 76.5 mm 9.5 mm 220 g

通信、软件和操作 - 带脉冲测量的指纹

RedMagic 7S Pro名义上支持Wi-Fi 6E,但在与我们的参考路由器华硕Rapture GT-AXE11000的组合中,它并不想找到6GHz网络,而且对于Wi-Fi 6来说,5GHz频率的传输速率非常慢。对于访问移动数据网络,RedMagic提供了一个坚实的配置,包括5G Sub6,支持欧洲的所有重要频段。

语音质量相当一般。当拿在耳朵上时,它是好的,但可以更清晰一些。对环境噪音的抑制也相当平庸。扬声器也有明显的回响,麦克风的范围也很短。支持VoLTE和Wi-Fi通话等功能。

谷歌Android 12与RedMagic OS 5.5用户界面被用作操作系统。除了谷歌的应用程序,努比亚不安装第三方应用程序。尽管有临时更新,但安全补丁只是到2022年6月1日为止,因此不再是最新的。制造商没有对更新的供应作出任何具体声明。我们宁愿期待不定期的安全补丁和最多一次重大升级。

显示器中的光学指纹传感器可用于生物识别安全。它能非常迅速地解锁RedMagic,并具有可靠的识别率。此外,还可以通过它进行脉搏测量。此外,还可以通过前置摄像头进行人脸识别,也可以选择使用。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro
Wi-Fi 6E
1616 (1469min - 1714max) MBit/s ∼100% +135%
Nubia RedMagic 7S Pro
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
687 (313min - 809max) MBit/s ∼43%
Nubia RedMagic 7
Wi-Fi 6E
227 (74min - 399max) MBit/s ∼14% -67%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro
Wi-Fi 6E
1553 (1451min - 1625max) MBit/s ∼100% +95%
Nubia RedMagic 7S Pro
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
796 (697min - 872max) MBit/s ∼51%
Nubia RedMagic 7
Wi-Fi 6E
717 (608min - 815max) MBit/s ∼46% -10%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro
Wi-Fi 6E
1730 (1564min - 1806max) MBit/s ∼100%
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
853 (785min - 906max) MBit/s ∼49%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro
Wi-Fi 6E
1617 (1593min - 1641max) MBit/s ∼100%
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
943 (893min - 950max) MBit/s ∼58%
095190285380475570665760855950104511401235133014251520161517101805Tooltip
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1730 (1564-1806)
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1616 (1593-1641)
Nubia RedMagic 7S Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø795 (697-872)
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1551 (1451-1625)
Nubia RedMagic 7S Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø676 (313-809)
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1616 (1469-1714)

摄像机 - RedMagic 7S Pro,带三个镜头和UDC

与RedMagic 7S Pro自拍
与RedMagic 7S Pro自拍

三合一相机系统的主要传感器是三星GW3。它能拍出好的照片,然而,在实践中有一个相当冷的白平衡,并被软件大大地锐化了。超广角镜头只有一些细节,不能真正说服人。第三个镜头可能只用于确定深度信息,但努比亚在这方面没有提供任何具体信息。

从侧面看屏幕时,可以很好地看到面板上的屏下摄像头(UDC),否则就几乎看不到了。对于社交媒体和信息传递来说,成像性能当然不突出,但还是足够的。视频只能以全高清记录,但用主摄像头拍摄8K的动态照片也是可以的。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main cameraMain cameraUltra wide-angle5x ZoomLow-Light
click to load images
ColorChecker
5.4 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
4 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
2.4 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
3 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
1.8 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
2.4 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
2 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
6 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
ColorChecker Nubia RedMagic 7S Pro: 5.02 ∆E min: 1.8 - max: 9.78 ∆E
ColorChecker
28.9 ∆E
53.9 ∆E
39.1 ∆E
37.8 ∆E
44.2 ∆E
64.1 ∆E
54.2 ∆E
34.8 ∆E
42.3 ∆E
26.7 ∆E
65.4 ∆E
65.2 ∆E
29.9 ∆E
48.3 ∆E
36.3 ∆E
76.8 ∆E
42.5 ∆E
44.6 ∆E
92.1 ∆E
70.3 ∆E
52.1 ∆E
36.6 ∆E
23.5 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
ColorChecker Nubia RedMagic 7S Pro: 46.78 ∆E min: 13.2 - max: 92.06 ∆E

显示器 - 120赫兹仅用于游戏

子像素结构
子像素结构

AMOLED显示屏的尺寸与红魔7一样大。 红魔7但它不太明亮,而且只能在120赫兹下工作。在启用环境光传感器的情况下,亮度平均为627cd/m²;通过手动控制,最高可达到464cd/m²。在亮区和暗区均匀分布的情况下(APL18),最高可达到811 cd/m²。这足以使HDR内容的显示具有吸引力,但RedMagic 7S Pro只支持HLG和HDR10。

制造商指定的刷新率最高为120赫兹,可以在设置中固定为60、90或120赫兹。如果选择最高值,系统仍以90 Hz工作,120 Hz只在游戏中启用。

与所有的OLED一样,RedMagic 7S Pro的也会出现闪烁。在最低显示亮度下,周期非常不稳定,在180和801赫兹之间闪烁。在面板亮度的46%以上,我们只能测量到90赫兹的刷新率。如果你激活直流调光模式,你会得到一个恒定的90 Hz。我们无法确定时间性抖动的情况。为此,我们用显微镜和240 FPS慢动作视频(深灰色,全亮度)观察显示器。

609
cd/m²
613
cd/m²
658
cd/m²
608
cd/m²
618
cd/m²
664
cd/m²
604
cd/m²
610
cd/m²
660
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 664 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 627.1 cd/m² Minimum: 3.89 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 618 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.9 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.2
ΔE Greyscale 4 | 0.57-98 Ø5.5
96.2% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.35
Nubia RedMagic 7S Pro
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.80
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro
AMOLED, 2448x1080, 6.78
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.67
Nubia RedMagic 7
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.80
Response Times
8%
-319%
13%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
1.27 ?(0.571, 0.698)
1.042 ?(0.5158, 0.5258)
18%
6 ?(3, 3)
-372%
0.912 ?(0.452, 0.461)
28%
Response Time Black / White *
1.3 ?(0.675, 0.6275)
0.998 ?(0.4794, 0.5186)
23%
8 ?(5, 3)
-515%
1.038 ?(0.521, 0.518)
20%
PWM Frequency
801
672.1
-16%
235
-71%
729
-9%
Screen
28%
-8%
-7%
Brightness middle
618
860
39%
642
4%
683
11%
Brightness
627
868
38%
637
2%
685
9%
Brightness Distribution
91
97
7%
96
5%
95
4%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.9
2.4
17%
3.19
-10%
3.6
-24%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
5.7
3.9
32%
7.12
-25%
6.7
-18%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
4
2.5
37%
4.9
-23%
5
-25%
Gamma
2.35 94%
2.08 106%
2.22 99%
2.14 103%
CCT
6098 107%
6640 98%
7671 85%
7537 86%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
18% / 22%
-164% / -112%
3% / -0%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
1.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.675 ms rise
↘ 0.6275 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.4 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (22.7 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.27 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.571 ms rise
↘ 0.698 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.25 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (35.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 801 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 801 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 801 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 19590 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

最小显示亮度
分钟。
25%显示亮度
25%
50% 显示亮度
50%
75% 显示亮度
75%
最大手动显示亮度
100%

具有固定变焦水平和不同亮度设置的测量系列

灰度(配置文件:自然,色温:暖,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
灰度(配置文件:自然,色温:暖,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
颜色(配置文件:自然,色温:暖,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
颜色(配置文件:自然,色温:暖,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩空间(配置文件:自然,色温:暖,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩空间(配置文件:自然,色温:暖,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
饱和度(配置文件:自然,色温:暖,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
饱和度(配置文件:自然,色温:暖,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
视角稳定
视角稳定
在户外
在户外

性能、排放和电池寿命

在我们的测试版本中,RedMagic 7S Pro依赖的是一个 骁龙8+第一代阿德雷诺730和12GB LPDDR5内存。在浏览系统或游戏时,没有任何限制。特别是在游戏时,转速高达20000转/分的风扇确保了几乎稳定的帧率,但也相当响亮,高达45 dB(A)。

两个扬声器的声音重现很干净,只要不设置得太大声,那么高音重的声音就会比较消极,听起来有点空洞。音频插孔(信噪比:86.10 dBFS)是一个很好的选择,那些喜欢使用蓝牙的人有广泛的音频编解码器支持(SBC、AAC、aptX、aptX HD、aptX自适应、aptX TWS+、LDAC)供他们使用。

电池比姐妹机型的5000毫安时要大,努比亚相应地设法从这个优势中产生更多的运行时间。然而,一天的使用应该仍然可以用一次电池充电。

Geekbench 5.4
Single-Core (sort by value)
Nubia RedMagic 7S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1348 Points ∼100%
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 18432
1309 Points ∼97% -3%
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1236 Points ∼92% -8%
Nubia RedMagic 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 18432
1244 Points ∼92% -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (930 - 1356, n=14)
1292 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (58 - 1885, n=266, last 2 years)
737 Points ∼55% -45%
Multi-Core (sort by value)
Nubia RedMagic 7S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
4233 Points ∼100%
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 18432
4162 Points ∼98% -2%
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
3742 Points ∼88% -12%
Nubia RedMagic 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 18432
3813 Points ∼90% -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (3987 - 4436, n=14)
4218 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (248 - 5538, n=266, last 2 years)
2373 Points ∼56% -44%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0 (sort by value)
Nubia RedMagic 7S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
13488 Points ∼76%
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 18432
17727 Points ∼100% +31%
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
12578 Points ∼71% -7%
Nubia RedMagic 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 18432
13295 Points ∼75% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (11029 - 17727, n=13)
14935 Points ∼84% +11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4436 - 19200, n=214, last 2 years)
10362 Points ∼58% -23%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Nubia RedMagic 7S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
13959 Points ∼100%
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 18432
13341 Points ∼96% -4%
Nubia RedMagic 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 18432
13121 Points ∼94% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (1067 - 14900, n=8)
12530 Points ∼90% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (149 - 14900, n=202, last 2 years)
5470 Points ∼39% -61%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Nubia RedMagic 7S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
27409 Points ∼99%
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 18432
27751 Points ∼100% +1%
Nubia RedMagic 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 18432
25906 Points ∼93% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (27175 - 27751, n=8)
27536 Points ∼99% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (122 - 31940, n=201, last 2 years)
8129 Points ∼29% -70%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Nubia RedMagic 7S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
5137 Points ∼100%
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 18432
4735 Points ∼92% -8%
Nubia RedMagic 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 18432
4811 Points ∼94% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (3341 - 5752, n=8)
5020 Points ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (651 - 6394, n=199, last 2 years)
3339 Points ∼65% -35%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Nubia RedMagic 7S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
12251 Points ∼100%
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 18432
11909 Points ∼97% -3%
Nubia RedMagic 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 18432
11528 Points ∼94% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (9166 - 13223, n=9)
11753 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (91 - 13223, n=229, last 2 years)
4415 Points ∼36% -64%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Nubia RedMagic 7S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
20746 Points ∼99%
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 18432
20955 Points ∼100% +1%
Nubia RedMagic 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 18432
19364 Points ∼92% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (13986 - 20955, n=9)
19790 Points ∼94% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (73 - 20955, n=228, last 2 years)
5812 Points ∼28% -72%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Nubia RedMagic 7S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
5035 Points ∼100%
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 18432
4743 Points ∼94% -6%
Nubia RedMagic 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 18432
4771 Points ∼95% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (3224 - 5857, n=9)
4930 Points ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (635 - 5857, n=228, last 2 years)
3324 Points ∼66% -34%
Wild Life Score (sort by value)
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 18432
Points ∼0%
Nubia RedMagic 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 18432
10062 Points ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (241 - 10062, n=202, last 2 years)
3144 Points ∼31%
Wild Life Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Nubia RedMagic 7S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
10987 Points ∼99%
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 18432
11024 Points ∼100% 0%
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
10238 Points ∼93% -7%
Nubia RedMagic 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 18432
10185 Points ∼92% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (10982 - 11201, n=13)
11052 Points ∼100% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (236 - 12429, n=223, last 2 years)
4050 Points ∼37% -63%
Wild Life Extreme (sort by value)
Nubia RedMagic 7S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
2810 Points ∼100%
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 18432
2818 Points ∼100% 0%
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
2606 Points ∼92% -7%
Nubia RedMagic 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 18432
2604 Points ∼92% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (2754 - 2873, n=13)
2805 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (22 - 3383, n=199, last 2 years)
1117 Points ∼40% -60%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited (sort by value)
Nubia RedMagic 7S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
2733 Points ∼99%
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 18432
2760 Points ∼100% +1%
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
2534 Points ∼91% -7%
Nubia RedMagic 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 18432
2549 Points ∼92% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (2698 - 2899, n=13)
2773 Points ∼100% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (101 - 3265, n=193, last 2 years)
1120 Points ∼40% -59%
GFXBench
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Nubia RedMagic 7S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
75 fps ∼84%
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 18432
74 fps ∼83% -1%
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
43 fps ∼48% -43%
Nubia RedMagic 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 18432
89 fps ∼100% +19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (51 - 104, n=13)
84.2 fps ∼95% +12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.7 - 104, n=260, last 2 years)
32.6 fps ∼37% -57%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Nubia RedMagic 7S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
98 fps ∼80%
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 18432
97 fps ∼79% -1%
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
60 fps ∼49% -39%
Nubia RedMagic 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 18432
123 fps ∼100% +26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (71 - 136, n=13)
109.6 fps ∼89% +12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.9 - 136, n=262, last 2 years)
40.8 fps ∼33% -58%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Nubia RedMagic 7S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
53 fps ∼85%
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 18432
62 fps ∼100% +17%
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
58 fps ∼94% +9%
Nubia RedMagic 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 18432
60 fps ∼97% +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (32 - 86, n=13)
61.3 fps ∼99% +16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3 - 86, n=261, last 2 years)
23 fps ∼37% -57%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Nubia RedMagic 7S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
36 fps ∼77%
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 18432
36 fps ∼77% 0%
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
19 fps ∼40% -47%
Nubia RedMagic 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 18432
47 fps ∼100% +31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (34 - 52, n=15)
43.7 fps ∼93% +21%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.7 - 52, n=262, last 2 years)
15.6 fps ∼33% -57%
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Nubia RedMagic 7S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
17622 Points ∼33%
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 18432
53898 Points ∼100% +206%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (17622 - 54646, n=13)
40189 Points ∼75% +128%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3905 - 74261, n=196, last 2 years)
26779 Points ∼50% +52%
Nubia RedMagic 7S ProAsus ROG Phone 6 ProXiaomi Black Shark 5 ProNubia RedMagic 7Average 256 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
19%
20%
-3%
-8%
-45%
Sequential Read 256KB
1822.05
1949.16
7%
1945.4
7%
1750
-4%
1774 ?(1014 - 2037, n=65)
-3%
993 ?(45.6 - 1999, n=257, last 2 years)
-46%
Sequential Write 256KB
1258.69
1454.5
16%
1485.2
18%
1260
0%
1046 ?(452 - 1783, n=65)
-17%
567 ?(11.9 - 1783, n=257, last 2 years)
-55%
Random Read 4KB
327.23
297.48
-9%
344.9
5%
306.2
-6%
275 ?(173.5 - 543, n=65)
-16%
183.3 ?(13.5 - 543, n=257, last 2 years)
-44%
Random Write 4KB
287.63
459.66
60%
424.8
48%
282.5
-2%
295 ?(197.5 - 490, n=66)
3%
184.5 ?(18.4 - 503, n=258, last 2 years)
-36%

温度

Max. Load
 35 °C35.3 °C34.2 °C 
 35.4 °C35 °C33.6 °C 
 34.5 °C35.1 °C33.8 °C 
Maximum: 35.4 °C
Average: 34.7 °C
32.4 °C32.6 °C33.3 °C
31 °C32.5 °C33.4 °C
31.4 °C32.6 °C33 °C
Maximum: 33.4 °C
Average: 32.5 °C
Power Supply (max.)  33.4 °C | Room Temperature 21.8 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.7 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.4 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22 to 52.9 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.4 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.9 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.


05101520253035404550556065Tooltip
Nubia RedMagic 7S Pro Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø16.7 (16.4-16.9)
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; with Fan: Ø16.7 (16.6-16.7)
Nubia RedMagic 7S Pro Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 1.0.9.1: Ø64 (62.3-65.1)
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; without Fan: Ø61.5 (59.8-62.8)
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; with Fan: Ø65.7 (65.6-66.1)

演讲者

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs204337.42530.434.93123.2304023.325.65036.438.36324.126.28020.323.210017.625.912515.727.316013.845.520016.249.625015.154.331512.657.140013.162.950013.168.763012.774.780014.776.7100013.473.9125012.875.9160012.877.6200012.878.8250013.279.3315013.778400013.979.5500013.173.1630013.970.3800013.367.8100001469.91250014.264.71600013.652.6SPL25.688.3N0.773.3median 13.6median 69.9Delta0.910.942.640.32944.427.841.225.845.432.547.922.446.224.548.519.449.316.552.618.458.712.858.49.958.311.363.113.163.911.473.21177.211.680.712.381.21282.112.482.812.283.61383.412.881.513.280.913.480.413.882.513.379.313.372.913.567.613.161.324.993.30.6101.6median 13median 77.20.79.5hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseNubia RedMagic 7S ProAsus ROG Phone 6 Pro
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Nubia RedMagic 7S Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.8% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 27% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 23%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 52% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (93.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.5% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 23%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 19% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

电池寿命

Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro
6000 mAh
1097 min ∼42% +47%
Average of class Smartphone
  (424 - 1953, n=265, last 2 years)
889 min ∼34% +19%
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro
4650 mAh
752 min ∼29% +1%
Nubia RedMagic 7S Pro
5000 mAh
748 min ∼28%
Nubia RedMagic 7
4500 mAh
667 min ∼25% -11%
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 104)
12h 28min

Pros

+ 高游戏性能
+ 额外的感应键
+ 快速触摸屏
+ 交付范围内的65W GaN充电器

Cons

- 大风扇
- 120赫兹只适用于游戏
- 蹩脚的无线网络
- 不确定的更新供应

结论--快速的游戏者,有一个响亮的风扇

在审查中。努比亚RedMagic 7S Pro。测试设备由Nubia RedMagic提供。
在审查中。努比亚RedMagic 7S Pro。测试设备由Nubia RedMagic提供。

努比亚RedMagic 7S Pro是一款不错的游戏智能手机,但它在某些地方对用户有点不友好。如果你想对触摸屏使用960赫兹的采样率,你必须先激活它,而且你还必须先设置更高的刷新率。同样遗憾的是,该系统中的导航被限制在90赫兹。

然而,如果你正在寻找纯粹的性能,并且不想拖着一个笨重的插入式风扇,RedMagic智能手机是正确的选择,但你将不得不忍受一个响亮的高频风扇。然而,它的长期性能管理得非常好。520赫兹的感应键也是一个有用的补充,而且运作良好。

RedMagic 7S Pro提供了大量的性能和一个很酷的游戏外观。

然而,7S Pro不得不接受对其Wi-Fi速度的批评。标称的Wi-Fi 6E既不支持6GHz网络,也不是特别快。更新供应也不确定;制造商在这方面没有具体声明。

没有集成风扇的强大游戏替代品是 黑鲨5 Pro和特别是同级别的领导者 ROG Phone 6 Pro.

价格和可用性

RedMagic 7S Pro可以直接从制造商的商店购买,地址是https://eu.redmagic.gg/de/products/redmagic-7s-pro但也可以从亚马逊.

Nubia RedMagic 7S Pro - 09/15/2022 v7
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis
82%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
94%
Connectivity
59 / 70 → 84%
Weight
87%
Battery
89%
Display
89%
Games Performance
70 / 64 → 100%
Application Performance
94 / 86 → 100%
Temperature
92%
Noise
61%
Audio
76 / 90 → 85%
Camera
61%
Average
79%
85%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
.170
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 努比亚RedMagic 7S Pro评测--集成风扇和UDC的游戏智能手机
Daniel Schmidt, 2022-09-18 (Update: 2022-09-18)