Notebookcheck Logo

Oppo Find X7 Ultra 评测 -Android 智能手机中的最佳摄像头？

对着镜头微笑 凭借骁龙 8 代 3，Oppo 为 Find X7 Ultra 配备了顶级处理器，并在其他硬件上采用了最好的技术。但最大的亮点显然是配备 1 英寸索尼 LYT-900 传感器的哈苏四摄像头，这使得这款 OPPO 智能手机有可能将Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max 等顶级智能手机推下相机宝座。
5G Android Camera Smartphone Touchscreen
Oppo Find X7 Ultra

凭借 Find X7 Ultra，Oppo 向市场推出了新款旗舰智能手机。与其 Find X6 Pro的前身一样，它配备了哈苏照相系统，可以与最好的照相智能手机相媲美。因此，Find X7 Ultra 必须与高端智能手机进行比较，如 三星Galaxy S24 Ultra.

虽然 Find X6 Pro 仍使用三个摄像头，但现在多了一个。Find X7 Ultra 的四摄像头系统的所有摄像头分辨率都达到了 5000 万像素，并使用了索尼全新的 Lyta 传感器。主摄像头采用索尼 LYT-900 传感器，尺寸为 1 英寸。此外还有一个超广角摄像头（索尼 LYT-600）和两个潜望式长焦摄像头（索尼 IMX890 和索尼 IMX858），光学变焦最高可达 6 倍。

在其余硬件方面，Oppo 也只采用了最好中的最好。采用了 骁龙 8 代 3Find X7 Ultra 配备了最快的智能手机 SoC。此外，Find X7 Ultra 还配备了速度极快的 120 Hz LTPO AMOLED 面板，分辨率为 3168x1440 像素。

Oppo Find X7 Ultra (Find X7 Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 8 x 2.3 - 3.3 GHz, Cortex-X4 / A720 / A720 / A520 (Kryo)
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 750
Memory
16 GB 
, LPDDR5X
Display
6.82 inch 19.8:9, 3168 x 1440 pixel 510 PPI, capacitive, AMOLED, 1-120Hz adaptive refresh rate (LTPO), up to 240 Hz touch sampling rate, 2600 nits peak brightness (HDR) , glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash, 512 GB 
, 476 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: geomagnetic sensor, acceleration sensor, gravity sensor, gyroscope, color temperature sensor, under-screen proximity sensor, rear spectrum sensor, hall sensor, Infrared remote control, laser focus sensor, DRM Widevine L1, Camera2 API Level 3, 2x2 MIMO, MU-MIMO
Networking
Wi-Fi 7 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.4, 2G (850/900/1800 MHz), 3G (Band 1/2/4/5/8), 4G (Band 1/2/3/4/5/7/8/12/17/18/19/20/26/28/34/38/39/40/41/66), 5G (Band 1/2/3/5/7/8/20/28/38/40/41/66/77/78/79), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 9.5 x 164.3 x 76.2
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Ion, 100W charging, 50W wireless charging, 10W reverse wireless charging
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 14
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (Sony LYT-900, f/1.8, 23mm, OIS) + 50 MP ultrawide (f/2.0, 14mm, 123° FOV, 4 cm macro shooting) + 50 MP telephoto (f/2.6, 65mm, OIS) + 50 MP telephoto (f/4.3, 135mm, OIS): up to 6x optical zoom, 120x digital zoom; video recording up to 4K@60fps
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix (f/2.4, 21mm; video recording up to 4K@60fps)
Additional features
Speakers: stereo, Keyboard: virtual, 100W charger, USB cable, SIM tool, protective case, ColorOS 14.0, 12 Months Warranty, SAR < 2 W/kg, fanless, waterproof
Weight
221 g, Power Supply: 117 g
Price
1100 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
90.6 %
04/2024
Oppo Find X7 Ultra
SD 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750		221 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.82"3168x1440
91.1 %
12/2023
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro, A17 Pro GPU		221 g256 GB NVMe6.70"2796x1290
89 %
12/2023
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7		213 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.70"2992x1344
90.6 %
03/2024
Honor Magic6 Pro
SD 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750		229 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.80"2800x1280
88.9 %
05/2023
Oppo Find X6 Pro
SD 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740		218 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.82"3168x1440
91.1 %
03/2024
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750		232 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.80"3120x1440
89.9 %
06/2023
Sony Xperia 1 V
SD 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740		187 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.50"3840x1644

6.82 英寸 Find X7 Ultra 的外壳设计紧随前代产品。从正面看，几乎看不出与 Find X6 Pro.AMOLED 面板两侧均为圆形，并由大猩猩 Victus 2 玻璃保护，后盖也是如此。自拍摄像头位于显示屏的打孔下方。

在后盖方面，Find X7 Ultra 沿用了 Find X6 Pro 的双色设计，将磨砂玻璃后盖与大尺寸摄像头模块相结合，摄像头模块从背面伸出约 5 毫米（约 0.2 英寸）。与前代产品不同的是，Find X6 Pro 的所有颜色版本（蓝色、黑色和棕色）的后盖下半部分都覆盖了人造皮革。这看起来很优雅，为智能手机提供了良好的触感，让手指握持时更有安全感。

Find X7 Ultra 的做工质量堪称一流。任何材料的过渡都紧密平齐。在我们的测试中，智能手机没有发生任何变形，也没有产生任何嘎吱声。Find X7 Ultra 符合 IP68 防尘防水标准。

这款 OPPO 智能手机的重量为 221 克（约 7.8 盎司），与同重量级别的其他旗舰智能手机相当。

Oppo Find X7 Ultra
Oppo Find X7 Ultra
Oppo Find X7 Ultra
Oppo Find X7 Ultra
Oppo Find X7 Ultra
Oppo Find X7 Ultra
Oppo Find X7 Ultra
Oppo Find X7 Ultra
Oppo Find X7 Ultra
Oppo Find X7 Ultra

尺寸比较

❌
164.8 mm 76.2 mm 9.5 mm 218 g164.3 mm 76.2 mm 9.5 mm 221 g165 mm 71 mm 8.3 mm 187 g162.6 mm 76.5 mm 8.8 mm 213 g162.5 mm 75.8 mm 8.9 mm 229 g162.3 mm 79 mm 8.6 mm 232 g159.9 mm 76.7 mm 8.25 mm 221 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

设备 - Find X7 Ultra 最高配备 16 GB 内存和 512 GB 存储空间

在本次测试期间，Oppo Find X7 Ultra 仅以进口方式销售，例如从TradingShenzhen 购买。为我们提供了测试机。目前还不清楚它是否会在德国正式发售。但这是有可能的，因为在与诺基亚的专利之争达成协议后 诺基亚因此，Oppo 再次获准在中国以外地区销售其智能手机。

OPPO Find X7 Ultra 有三种存储版本，均配备 LPDDR5X 内存和快速 UFS 4.0 存储。与许多其他高端竞争对手不同的是，它没有 1 TB 存储容量的选项，这一点很奇怪。

  • 12 GB + 256 GB：约 820 欧元（约合 890 美元）
  • 16 GB + 256 GB：约 910 欧元（约 987 美元）
  • 16 GB + 512 GB：约 980 欧元（约合 1,063 美元）

支持 OTG 的 USB-C 端口以 USB-C 3.2 Gen 1 的速度运行，实际传输速度应在 300 MB/s 左右。但在我们使用外置三星 980 Pro 固态硬盘进行的拷贝测试中，USB-C 端口的传输速度仍然低于我们的预期，因为它的传输速度不超过 164 MB/s。连接的媒体可以格式化为 NTFS 或 exFAT。

这款 OPPO 智能手机配备了蓝牙 5.4、红外爆破器和 NFC，提供了同价位手机中典型的良好设备。虽然缺少一些功能，如 3.5 毫米音频接口和通过 microSD 卡进行存储扩展的选项，但无论如何，这在该智能手机领域都是罕见的例外。在我们的对比设备中，只有 索尼 Xperia 1 V提供了这两个选项。

左：静音和隐私键
左：静音和隐私键
右：音量摇杆、电源按钮
右：音量摇杆、电源按钮
顶部：扬声器、麦克风、红外爆破器
顶部：扬声器、麦克风、红外爆破器
底部：扬声器、麦克风、USB-C 3.2 Gen.1、麦克风、双 SIM 卡
底部：扬声器、麦克风、USB-C 3.2 Gen.1、麦克风、双 SIM 卡

软件 -Android 14 和长达 5 年的更新

Find X7 Ultra 包括Android 14 和制造商自制的 ColorOS 用户界面。OPPO 计划为其智能手机提供 4 年的操作系统升级和 5 年的安全更新。根据制造商的说法，安全更新将以每月一次的间隔进行。OPPO 也兑现了承诺：在我们 4 月初进行测试时，这款智能手机收到了更新（ColorOS 14.0.1.501），将Android 安全补丁升级到了目前的 3 月 5 日级别。

由此可见，Find X7 Ultra 在软件更新方面处于有利地位，尽管有些竞争对手提供的更新甚至更多。例如，三星Galaxy S24 系列和谷歌 Pixel 8 系列将有 7 年的更新时间，这既包括安全补丁，也包括版本更新。

Find X7 Ultra 的进口版本是中文 ColorOS 版本，但也支持英文。支持的语言还包括法语和俄语，但不支持德语。在交付状态下，中文 ROM 不包括任何预装的谷歌应用程序。不过，在Android "附加设置"、"谷歌设置"下的 "谷歌移动服务 "中激活谷歌移动服务 后，就可以顺利安装谷歌应用商店和其他谷歌应用了。

Oppo Find X7 Ultra
Oppo Find X7 Ultra
Oppo Find X7 Ultra
Oppo Find X7 Ultra
Oppo Find X7 Ultra
Oppo Find X7 Ultra
Oppo Find X7 Ultra
Oppo Find X7 Ultra

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - WiFi 7 和 LTE 频段 20

尽管 Find X7 Ultra 支持 WiFi 7，但它无法使用华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 参考路由器的 6 千兆赫频段。WiFi 传输速率的最大值为 967 Mb/s，因此相对较低。但至少它们在发送和接收方向上都非常稳定。

虽然 Find X7 Ultra 的进口版本针对中国市场进行了优化，但它支持德国的许多重要频段，包括 LTE 频段 20 和 28，因此在欧盟地区使用它没有任何问题。OPPO 没有为其智能手机规定任何具体的 SAR 值，随附的信息宣传单只说最大 SAR 值低于 2 W/kg。

Networking
Oppo Find X7 Ultra
iperf3 receive AXE11000
967 (min: 890) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
950 (min: 484) MBit/s ∼100%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
iperf3 receive AXE11000
810 (min: 793) MBit/s ∼84%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
931 (min: 893) MBit/s ∼98%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1534 (min: 1415) MBit/s ∼86%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1345 (min: 1298) MBit/s ∼88%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
iperf3 receive AXE11000
897 (min: 870) MBit/s ∼93%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
892 (min: 333) MBit/s ∼94%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1468 (min: 1069) MBit/s ∼83%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1467 (min: 1304) MBit/s ∼96%
Honor Magic6 Pro
iperf3 receive AXE11000
806 (min: 404) MBit/s ∼83%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
904 (min: 308) MBit/s ∼95%
Oppo Find X6 Pro
iperf3 receive AXE11000
693 (min: 310) MBit/s ∼72%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
768 (min: 223) MBit/s ∼81%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
iperf3 receive AXE11000
801 (min: 397) MBit/s ∼83%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
556 (min: 253) MBit/s ∼59%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1553 (min: 815) MBit/s ∼87%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1461 (min: 1284) MBit/s ∼95%
Sony Xperia 1 V
iperf3 receive AXE11000
818 (min: 410) MBit/s ∼85%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
946 (min: 912) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1778 (min: 891) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1530 (min: 1492) MBit/s ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
iperf3 receive AXE11000
646 (min: 34.8) MBit/s ∼67%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
685 (min: 40.5) MBit/s ∼72%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1536 (min: 229) MBit/s ∼86%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1364 (min: 598) MBit/s ∼89%
090180270360450540630720810900990108011701260135014401530162017101800Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 750; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1526 (815-1800)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 750; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1461 (1284-1543)
Oppo Find X7 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 750; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø959 (890-984)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 750; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø786 (397-819)
Oppo Find X7 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 750; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø934 (484-1003)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 750; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø548 (253-611)
室内 GPS 接收
室内 GPS 接收
户外 GPS 接收
户外 GPS 接收

Find X7 Ultra 使用 GPS（L1、L5）、Glonass（L1）、Galileo（E1、E5a）、北斗（B1、B1C、B2A）和 QZSS（L1、L5）卫星导航服务确定自己的位置。在我们的测试中，无论是在室外还是在室内，它都能成功实现高达 3 米（约 10 英尺）的精度。

在我们的测试中，Find X7 Ultra 的导航功能未能激发任何热情。虽然在大多数情况下，Oppo 智能手机能像 Garmin Venu 2 健身智能手表一样准确地记录我们 10 公里（约 6.2 英里）自行车之旅的路线，但有时智能手机也会出现一些严重的掉线现象，使我们的定位与实际路线相差甚远。

GPS 测试：概述
GPS 测试：概述
GPS 测试：环湖
GPS 测试：环湖
GPS 测试：转折点
GPS 测试：转折点

电话功能和语音质量

Find X7 Ultra 提供一个双 SIM 卡插槽，可插入两张 Nano-SIM 卡，除了 VoLTE 外，它还支持 WLAN 通话。不过，不能激活 eSIM 卡。

在我们的测试中，Oppo 智能手机的语音质量很好。即使在大音量的环境中，背景噪音也能被有效过滤掉，我们的声音也能清晰响亮地传递给通话对象。

摄像头 - 4x 50MP，1 英寸索尼 LYT-900 传感器

使用自拍相机拍摄的照片
使用自拍相机拍摄的照片

Find X7 Ultra 的自拍摄像头采用 3200 万像素索尼 IMX709（21 毫米，f/2.4）。它不使用像素二进制，能拍摄出具有许多细节和漂亮虚化效果的迷人照片。

Find X7 Ultra 的核心部件是与哈苏合作建立的四摄像头系统。它由一个 50-MP 主摄像头（采用索尼 LYT-900 传感器，1 英寸格式，23 mm，f1.8，OIS）、一个 50-MP 超广角镜头（索尼 LYT-600，14 mm，f/1.6）（带 4 厘米微距）、一个 50-MP 潜望式长焦镜头（索尼 IMX890，f/2.6，65 mm，3 倍，OIS）和一个 50-MP 变焦镜头（索尼 IMX858，f/4.3，135 mm，6 倍，OIS）组成。自从更新到 14.0.1.501 版 ColorOS 后，这四款相机也都支持 5000 万像素的 RAW 格式记录。

默认情况下，5000 万像素主摄像头可拍摄 1250 万像素的照片，在任何拍摄环境下都非常出色。在白天，它的动态范围大，色彩还原准确，细节丰富，图像噪点极少。在夜间，主摄像头的表现也堪称旗舰，因为它配备了 1 英寸感光图像传感器，即使在困难的拍摄条件下也能很好地应对。总之，它是目前最好的智能手机摄像头之一，可以轻松对抗强大的旗舰竞争对手，如Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max 和Google Pixel 8 Pro 。

使用主摄像头拍摄的照片
使用主摄像头拍摄的照片
使用主摄像头拍摄的照片
使用主摄像头拍摄的照片
使用主摄像头拍摄的照片
使用主摄像头拍摄的照片
使用主摄像头拍摄的照片
使用主摄像头拍摄的照片
使用超广角摄像头拍摄的照片
使用超广角摄像头拍摄的照片
使用主摄像头拍摄的照片
使用主摄像头拍摄的照片
使用远摄相机（3 倍光学变焦）拍摄的照片
使用远摄相机（3 倍光学变焦）拍摄的照片
使用远摄相机（6 倍光学变焦）拍摄的照片
使用远摄相机（6 倍光学变焦）拍摄的照片
使用远摄相机（6 倍光学变焦）拍摄的照片
使用远摄相机（6 倍光学变焦）拍摄的照片

这两款长焦相机分别使用 3 倍和 6 倍光学变焦，数码变焦可达 120 倍。 这两款相机都能拍摄出细节丰富、色彩准确的照片，即使在边缘区域也能显示出较高的图像清晰度。

尽管 5000 万像素超广角摄像头的画质略低于主摄像头和长焦摄像头，无法完全跟上它们的细节水平，但它的画质仍然高于平均水平。照片仅在边缘部分略显模糊和噪点。超广角摄像头还可用作微距镜头。

在我们的测试中，Find X7 Ultra 的 5 个摄像头都能以高达 4K 和每秒 60 帧的速度录制视频，成像质量非常不错。在背面的相机模块中，您可以在录制高达 4K 和 60 FPS 的视频时在所有镜头之间来回切换，此外，您还可以激活杜比视界进行 HDR 录制。但在拍摄过程中不能在主摄像头和自拍摄像头之间切换。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Daylight recording 1Daylight recording 2Ultrawide angle5x zoomLowlight recording

我们再来看看主摄像头在可控光线条件下的表现。在最佳光照条件下，色彩记录非常准确（Delta E < 10），在 1 Lux 的剩余光照条件下，测试图的整个区域仍能再现。

ColorChecker
5.4 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
5 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
1.6 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
1.3 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
2.4 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
3 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
7 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
2.6 ∆E
4 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
ColorChecker Oppo Find X7 Ultra: 4.48 ∆E min: 1.32 - max: 9.21 ∆E
ColorChecker
25.2 ∆E
38.7 ∆E
31.1 ∆E
30.6 ∆E
35.1 ∆E
47.4 ∆E
35.8 ∆E
25.1 ∆E
26.7 ∆E
26.2 ∆E
47.7 ∆E
48.9 ∆E
22.2 ∆E
35.6 ∆E
20.6 ∆E
43.2 ∆E
31.5 ∆E
36.4 ∆E
37.7 ∆E
41.7 ∆E
41.1 ∆E
34.2 ∆E
23.3 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Oppo Find X7 Ultra: 33.3 ∆E min: 13.35 - max: 48.86 ∆E

配件和保修 - Oppo Find X7 Ultra 附带 100 瓦充电器

附带的 100 瓦充电器
附带的 100 瓦充电器

Find X7 Ultra 的包装盒包括一个 100 瓦充电器（11V/9.1A）、一根 USB 数据线、一个 SIM 卡工具、一个保护盖和一本快速入门手册。如果您从为我们提供测试机的 TradingShenzhen（欧洲）购买智能手机，您还会得到一个用于充电器的欧盟适配器。

Find X7 Ultra 提供 12 个月保修。

输入设备和操作 - 带有隐私模式专用键

Find X7 Ultra 在电容式触摸屏上的输入准确无误，没有任何明显的延迟。电源键和音量摇杆也为高品质的整体印象做出了贡献，它们紧紧地镶嵌在边框中，提供了一个清晰的压力点。振动电机提供了强大而有吸引力的触觉反馈。

与Apple 的 iPhone 15 系列类似，Find X7 Ultra 也在机壳左侧提供了一个额外的按键。Oppo 版的 "操作按钮 "是一个滑动键，可以让智能手机静音（向底部滑动：关闭，中间位置：打开）。但它还有另一个功能：如果把按键滑向顶部，就会激活 "VIP 模式"，然后关闭摄像头、麦克风和与定位相关的服务，以保护你的隐私。

光学指纹传感器位于显示屏下方。它能快速、可靠地解锁智能手机。如果你喜欢，可以调整传感器的动画效果，还可以在触摸指纹传感器时发出声音。您还可以使用 2D 人脸识别进行生物识别验证。在日光充足的情况下，它能像指纹传感器一样快速验证我们的身份。

纵向格式键盘（Google Gboard）
纵向格式键盘（Google Gboard）
横向格式键盘（Google Gboard）
横向格式键盘（Google Gboard）

显示屏 - LTPO AMOLED 面板，120 赫兹

子像素网格
子像素网格

Find X7 Ultra 的 LTPO AMOLED 面板分辨率高达 3168x1440 像素。它能根据显示内容在 1 到 120 Hz 之间平滑调节刷新率。您也可以将其固定在 60 或 120 Hz。此外，你还可以为每个已安装的应用程序设置刷新率，在 60、90 或 120 Hz 之间进行选择。

OPPO 承诺显示屏的最大亮度为 4500 尼特，但在测试中根本达不到这个水平。尽管我们测得的所有数值即使在高端标准中也是不错的，但一些竞争对手却能达到更高的数值。

在 HDR 模式下，我们测得的最高值为 1578 cd/m²。在纯白背景下，AMOLED 面板的亮度可达 1154 cd/m²，而在亮暗图像区域均匀分布的情况下（APL18），最高亮度为 1139 cd/m²。在最低亮度水平，我们仍然测得 2.52 cd/m²。

在所有亮度水平下，AMOLED 面板都无法避免这种技术的典型闪烁现象。在最低亮度下，我们使用 Rigol 示波器测得的 PWM 频率为 91 Hz。这个数值确实太低，因此可能会给某些用户带来问题。不过，由于振幅变化非常平缓，大多数用户应该不会觉得有什么问题。

1144
cd/m²		1154
cd/m²		1095
cd/m²
1119
cd/m²		1131
cd/m²		1077
cd/m²
1125
cd/m²		1132
cd/m²		1086
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 1154 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1118.1 cd/m² Minimum: 2.52 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 1131 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 1.5 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
97.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.25
Oppo Find X7 Ultra
AMOLED, 3168x1440, 6.82		Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
OLED, 2796x1290, 6.70		Google Pixel 8 Pro
OLED, 2992x1344, 6.70		Honor Magic6 Pro
OLED, 2800x1280, 6.80		Oppo Find X6 Pro
AMOLED, 3168x1440, 6.82		Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 3120x1440, 6.80		Sony Xperia 1 V
AMOLED, 3840x1644, 6.50
Screen
-13%
-9%
-28%
-9%
-77%
-29%
Brightness middle
1131
1102
-3%
1510
34%
1575
39%
1109
-2%
1317
16%
934
-17%
Brightness
1118
1102
-1%
1467
31%
1508
35%
1190
6%
1365
22%
948
-15%
Brightness Distribution
93
98
5%
92
-1%
89
-4%
91
-2%
94
1%
96
3%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
0.9
1.1
-22%
1.1
-22%
1.7
-89%
1.3
-44%
3.4
-278%
1.5
-67%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
2.1
3.1
-48%
3.8
-81%
3.9
-86%
2.2
-5%
5
-138%
4
-90%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.5
1.6
-7%
1.7
-13%
2.4
-60%
1.6
-7%
2.8
-87%
1.3
13%
Gamma
2.25 98%
2.19 100%
2.23 99%
2.22 99%
2.23 99%
2 110%
2.2 100%
CCT
6495 100%
6555 99%
6670 97%
6398 102%
6571 99%
6458 101%
6384 102%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 91 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 91 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 91 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17903 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

最低显示亮度
分钟
25% 显示屏亮度
25%
50% 显示亮度
50%
75% 显示亮度
75%
最大手动显示亮度
100%

在固定变焦级别和各种亮度设置下进行系列测量


您可以在显示设置中调整 AMOLED 面板的色彩显示，从三种色彩模式中进行选择：自然（默认）、专业和鲜艳。此外，您还可以使用色圈或从预设色温 "暖"、"默认"和 "冷"中进行选择来调节色温。

在使用 DCI-P3 色彩空间的专业模式下，显示屏的图像质量最佳。我们使用光光谱仪和卡尔曼分析软件进行的分析表明，色彩偏离理想目标值的程度很低，肉眼不会察觉。

色彩准确度（显示模式：专业版，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩准确度（显示模式：专业版，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩空间（显示模式：专业版，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩空间（显示模式：专业版，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
灰度（显示模式：专业，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
灰度（显示模式：专业，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
饱和度（显示模式：专业，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
饱和度（显示模式：专业，目标色彩空间：sRGB）

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
1.08 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.596 ms rise
↘ 0.483 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
3.49 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.196 ms rise
↘ 2.292 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 9 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

在户外使用时，Find X7 Ultra 给人留下了非常好的印象，因为即使在阳光直射的情况下，显示屏上的内容仍然可以轻松读取。不过，手动调节显示屏亮度的缺点比较明显。如果关闭自动亮度，同时关闭亮度传感器，那么最大亮度值仍远未达到四位数。在我们的测试中，最高亮度不超过 781 cd/m²。可视角度稳定。

室外使用（阴凉处）
室外使用（阴凉处）
室外使用（阳光直射下）
室外使用（阳光直射下）
视角
视角

性能 - 配备骁龙 8 代 3 处理器的 Find X7 Ultra

配备 骁龙 8 代 3Oppo Find X7 Ultra 采用了最快的智能手机处理器之一。但 骁龙 8 代 3Galaxy骁龙 8 代 3 的主频高达 3.39 GHz（骁龙 8 代 3 的主频为 3.3 GHz）。 三星Galaxy S24 Ultra甚至还要更快一些。

如果您想从 OPPO 智能手机中获得最高性能，就必须在电池设置中激活高性能模式。我们使用该模式进行基准测试。

在我们的测试中，Find X7 Ultra 的顶级性能给人留下了深刻印象，与其他设备（如 Honor Magic6 Pro和 三星Galaxy S24 Ultra- 目前还无法实现更快的速度。只有在 Geekbench 6.2 中 Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max才能达到更高的单核和多核性能。另一方面，Find X7 Ultra 和Honor Magic6 Pro 是我们对比中唯一能在 AImark v3 AI 基准测试中达到满分的智能手机。

Geekbench 5.5 | Geekbench 6.2 | Antutu v9 | Antutu v10 | PCMark for Android | CrossMark | BaseMark OS II | UL Procyon AI Inference for Android | AImark
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
1716 Points +1%
Oppo Find X7 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
1699 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (1575 - 1702, n=10)
1672 Points -2%
Honor Magic6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1654 Points -3%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
1274 Points -25%
Oppo Find X6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
1191 Points -30%
Average of class Smartphone
  (119 - 2138, n=220, last 2 years)
911 Points -46%
Multi-Core
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
6426 Points +8%
Honor Magic6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
6157 Points +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (5393 - 6543, n=10)
6103 Points +2%
Oppo Find X7 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
5977 Points
Oppo Find X6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
4998 Points -16%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
3624 Points -39%
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 6681, n=220, last 2 years)
2988 Points -50%
Geekbench 6.2
Single-Core
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
Apple A17 Pro, A17 Pro GPU, 8192
2930 Points +32%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
2287 Points +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (2127 - 2329, n=12)
2238 Points +1%
Oppo Find X7 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
2222 Points
Honor Magic6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
2127 Points -4%
Sony Xperia 1 V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
1774 Points -20%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
1769 Points -20%
Average of class Smartphone
  (193 - 2930, n=105, last 2 years)
1390 Points -37%
Multi-Core
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
Apple A17 Pro, A17 Pro GPU, 8192
7244 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
7102 Points +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (6432 - 7501, n=12)
6991 Points +3%
Honor Magic6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
6765 Points 0%
Oppo Find X7 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
6756 Points
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
4538 Points -33%
Sony Xperia 1 V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
4255 Points -37%
Average of class Smartphone
  (845 - 7408, n=105, last 2 years)
3840 Points -43%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (1521387 - 1650926, n=4)
1591473 Points +5%
Oppo Find X7 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
1521387 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
1473430 Points -3%
Oppo Find X6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
1312927 Points -14%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
896410 Points -41%
Average of class Smartphone
  (102602 - 1650926, n=153, last 2 years)
738503 Points -51%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Oppo Find X7 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
2089591 Points
Honor Magic6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
2050639 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (1624507 - 2162423, n=11)
2005548 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
1837994 Points -12%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
Apple A17 Pro, A17 Pro GPU, 8192
1487075 Points -29%
Average of class Smartphone
  (281399 - 2162423, n=51, last 2 years)
1249818 Points -40%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
1113506 Points -47%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
18672 Points +12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (15343 - 21628, n=11)
18565 Points +11%
Honor Magic6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
18155 Points +8%
Oppo Find X7 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
16738 Points
Oppo Find X6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
14001 Points -16%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
11824 Points -29%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4761 - 21385, n=215, last 2 years)
11771 Points -30%
CrossMark - Overall
Honor Magic6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1474 Points +16%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
1443 Points +14%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
Apple A17 Pro, A17 Pro GPU, 8192
1408 Points +11%
Oppo Find X7 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
1270 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (1043 - 1474, n=8)
1227 Points -3%
Sony Xperia 1 V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
1224 Points -4%
Oppo Find X6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
1221 Points -4%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
935 Points -26%
Average of class Smartphone
  (200 - 1474, n=165, last 2 years)
837 Points -34%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Oppo Find X7 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
10556 Points
Honor Magic6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
10480 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (8165 - 10966, n=9)
10135 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
9696 Points -8%
Oppo Find X6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
9456 Points -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (411 - 11438, n=166, last 2 years)
5759 Points -45%
System
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
16475 Points +10%
Honor Magic6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
14961 Points 0%
Oppo Find X7 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
14916 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (8611 - 15935, n=9)
14075 Points -6%
Oppo Find X6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
13356 Points -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2376 - 16475, n=166, last 2 years)
9672 Points -35%
Memory
Honor Magic6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
11039 Points +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (8937 - 12716, n=9)
11005 Points +1%
Oppo Find X7 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
10882 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
10389 Points -5%
Oppo Find X6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
9837 Points -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (670 - 12716, n=166, last 2 years)
6267 Points -42%
Graphics
Oppo Find X7 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
38586 Points
Honor Magic6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
35448 Points -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (29938 - 38586, n=9)
34206 Points -11%
Oppo Find X6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
30125 Points -22%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
27905 Points -28%
Average of class Smartphone
  (697 - 58651, n=166, last 2 years)
14220 Points -63%
Web
Honor Magic6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
2060 Points +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (1661 - 2145, n=9)
2009 Points +1%
Oppo Find X6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
2001 Points +1%
Oppo Find X7 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
1982 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
1815 Points -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10 - 2145, n=166, last 2 years)
1495 Points -25%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
27018 Points +49%
Average of class Smartphone
  (207 - 84787, n=150, last 2 years)
21814 Points +20%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
18852 Points +4%
Oppo Find X7 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
18163 Points
Honor Magic6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
18147 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (13873 - 18370, n=10)
16833 Points -7%
Oppo Find X6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
15738 Points -13%
AImark - Score v3.x
Honor Magic6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
245629 Points +3%
Oppo Find X7 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
238544 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (1381 - 245629, n=9)
108185 Points -55%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
Apple A17 Pro, A17 Pro GPU, 8192
29087 Points -88%
Average of class Smartphone
  (298 - 245629, n=105, last 2 years)
17833 Points -93%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
1518 Points -99%
Oppo Find X6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
1321 Points -99%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
1109 Points -100%
Sony Xperia 1 V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
1067 Points -100%

钛 Adreno 750骁龙 8 代 3 中使用的 Adreno 750 可能是目前最快的Android GPU。在图形测试中，它推动 Find X7 Ultra 遥遥领先，将 Apple A17 ProGPU 的 Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max明显落后。只有 GFXBench 的屏幕测试结果不是特别好，但这是由于该基准将帧速率限制在 60 FPS，即使启动了 120Hz 显示屏。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Honor Magic6 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5167 Points +6%
Oppo Find X7 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4876 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4804 Points -1%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
3879 Points -20%
Oppo Find X6 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3721 Points -24%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2410 Points -51%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Honor Magic6 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5177 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5040 Points +4%
Oppo Find X7 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4853 Points
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
3765 Points -22%
Oppo Find X6 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3704 Points -24%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2422 Points -50%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
20068 Points +3%
Honor Magic6 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
19545 Points 0%
Oppo Find X7 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
19459 Points
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
15260 Points -22%
Oppo Find X6 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
14012 Points -28%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8922 Points -54%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Oppo Find X7 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
7825 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
7451 Points -5%
Honor Magic6 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6883 Points -12%
Oppo Find X6 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6489 Points -17%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5044 Points -36%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Oppo Find X7 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
32662 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
29081 Points -11%
Oppo Find X6 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
25152 Points -23%
Honor Magic6 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
24304 Points -26%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
13743 Points -58%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Oppo Find X7 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
19153 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
17677 Points -8%
Honor Magic6 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
15555 Points -19%
Oppo Find X6 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
15344 Points -20%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9935 Points -48%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps +100%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +100%
Honor Magic6 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +100%
Sony Xperia 1 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
116 fps +93%
Oppo Find X6 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps 0%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps 0%
Oppo Find X7 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
549 fps +3%
Honor Magic6 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
544 fps +2%
Oppo Find X7 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
535 fps
Oppo Find X6 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
488 fps -9%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
444 fps -17%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
348 fps -35%
Sony Xperia 1 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
301 fps -44%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps +100%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +100%
Honor Magic6 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +100%
Sony Xperia 1 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
99 fps +65%
Oppo Find X6 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps 0%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps 0%
Oppo Find X7 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
339 fps +6%
Honor Magic6 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
327 fps +2%
Oppo Find X7 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
321 fps
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
262 fps -18%
Oppo Find X6 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
241 fps -25%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
174 fps -46%
Sony Xperia 1 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
115 fps -64%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Honor Magic6 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +100%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
117 fps +95%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
115 fps +92%
Sony Xperia 1 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
68 fps +13%
Oppo Find X6 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps 0%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps 0%
Oppo Find X7 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Honor Magic6 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
261 fps +3%
Oppo Find X7 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
253 fps
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
247 fps -2%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
180 fps -29%
Oppo Find X6 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
161 fps -36%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
112 fps -56%
Sony Xperia 1 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
108 fps -57%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Honor Magic6 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
101 fps +68%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
83 fps +38%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
71 fps +18%
Sony Xperia 1 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
69 fps +15%
Oppo Find X6 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps 0%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps 0%
Oppo Find X7 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Oppo Find X6 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
166 fps +5%
Honor Magic6 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
162 fps +3%
Oppo Find X7 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
158 fps
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
142 fps -10%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
110 fps -30%
Sony Xperia 1 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
88 fps -44%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
75 fps -53%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Honor Magic6 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
92 fps +53%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
72 fps +20%
Sony Xperia 1 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
67 fps +12%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
63 fps +5%
Oppo Find X7 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
55 fps -8%
Oppo Find X6 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
54 fps -10%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Honor Magic6 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
90 fps +8%
Oppo Find X7 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
83 fps
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
71 fps -14%
Oppo Find X6 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
61 fps -27%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
61 fps -27%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
37 fps -55%
Sony Xperia 1 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
24 fps -71%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Honor Magic6 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +100%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
114 fps +90%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
91 fps +52%
Oppo Find X6 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps 0%
Oppo Find X7 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
59 fps -2%
Sony Xperia 1 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
45 fps -25%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Honor Magic6 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
228 fps +10%
Oppo Find X7 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
208 fps
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
187 fps -10%
Oppo Find X6 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
145 fps -30%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
117 fps -44%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
98 fps -53%
Sony Xperia 1 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
82 fps -61%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Honor Magic6 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
42 fps +8%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
40 fps +3%
Oppo Find X7 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
39 fps
Sony Xperia 1 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
31 fps -21%
Oppo Find X6 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
28 fps -28%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
25 fps -36%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
16 fps -59%

在浏览器性能方面，Find X7 Ultra 的主观表现非常出色，网站加载速度非常快，而且可以流畅快速地滚动浏览。不过，这一点在浏览器基准测试中并没有得到体现，因为这款 OPPO 智能手机在测试中仅处于中游水平。

Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | WebXPRT 4 | WebXPRT 3 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 17)
254.048 Points +76%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra (Chrome 121)
209.919 Points +45%
Oppo Find X6 Pro (Chrome 113)
158.575 Points +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (69.2 - 241, n=13)
158.3 Points +10%
Oppo Find X7 Ultra (Chrome 122.0.6261.119)
144.545 Points
Sony Xperia 1 V (Chrome 114)
143.878 Points 0%
Honor Magic6 Pro (Chrome 122)
117.078 Points -19%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 351, n=173, last 2 years)
106.1 Points -27%
Google Pixel 8 Pro (Chrome 117)
105.175 Points -27%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 17)
445 runs/min +189%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra (Chrome 121)
265 runs/min +72%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (69.6 - 311, n=11)
191.6 runs/min +24%
Sony Xperia 1 V (Chrome 114)
168 runs/min +9%
Google Pixel 8 Pro (Chrome 117)
158 runs/min +3%
Oppo Find X7 Ultra (Chrome 122.0.6261.119)
154 runs/min
Oppo Find X6 Pro (Chrome 113)
145 runs/min -6%
Honor Magic6 Pro (Chrome 122)
134 runs/min -13%
Average of class Smartphone (14.9 - 445, n=157, last 2 years)
107.1 runs/min -30%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra (Chrome 121)
195 Points +46%
Sony Xperia 1 V (Chrome 114)
166 Points +24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (112 - 196, n=10)
158.8 Points +19%
Oppo Find X6 Pro (Chrome 113)
147 Points +10%
Oppo Find X7 Ultra (Chrome 122.0.6261.119)
134 Points
Honor Magic6 Pro
112 Points -16%
Google Pixel 8 Pro (Chrome 117)
103 Points -23%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 202, n=160, last 2 years)
100.2 Points -25%
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 17)
304 Points +80%
Sony Xperia 1 V
235 Points +39%
Oppo Find X6 Pro (Chrome 113)
219 Points +30%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra (Chrome 121)
218 Points +29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (142 - 310, n=8)
206 Points +22%
Oppo Find X7 Ultra (Chrome 122.0.6261.119)
169 Points
Honor Magic6 Pro (Chrome 122)
142 Points -16%
Average of class Smartphone (39 - 304, n=122, last 2 years)
133.1 Points -21%
Google Pixel 8 Pro (Chrome 117)
129 Points -24%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 17)
86270 Points +80%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra (Chrome 121)
72011 Points +51%
Sony Xperia 1 V (Chrome 114)
60007 Points +25%
Oppo Find X6 Pro (Chrome 113)
56848 Points +19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (25953 - 70135, n=11)
54354 Points +14%
Google Pixel 8 Pro (Chrome 117)
49506 Points +3%
Oppo Find X7 Ultra (Chrome 122.0.6261.119)
47834 Points
Honor Magic6 Pro (Chrome 122)
37221 Points -22%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 89112, n=214, last 2 years)
33357 Points -30%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=173, last 2 years)
1595 ms * -53%
Honor Magic6 Pro (Chrome 122)
1153.9 ms * -11%
Oppo Find X7 Ultra (Chrome 122.0.6261.119)
1039.2 ms *
Oppo Find X6 Pro (Chrome 113)
853.5 ms * +18%
Google Pixel 8 Pro (Chrome 117)
840.2 ms * +19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (624 - 1154, n=11)
800 ms * +23%
Sony Xperia 1 V (Chrome 114)
701.7 ms * +32%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra (Chrome 121)
599 ms * +42%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 17)
388.3 ms * +63%

* ... smaller is better

凭借 UFS 4.0 存储，Find X7 Ultra 达到了极高的数据吞吐值。即使是较大的应用程序，也能快速安装并在片刻后加载。在 Honor Magic6 Pro的内置存储也使用了同样快速的连接，而 三星Galaxy S24 Ultra则在顺序和随机写入方面明显落后，尽管使用的是相同的存储类型。

Oppo Find X7 UltraGoogle Pixel 8 ProHonor Magic6 ProOppo Find X6 ProSamsung Galaxy S24 UltraAverage 512 GB UFS 4.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-70%
-1%
-17%
-33%
-12%
-59%
Sequential Read 256KB
3965.08
1501.13
-62%
3923.31
-1%
3307.82
-17%
3610.25
-9%
3712 ?(2451 - 4512, n=19)
-6%
1506 ?(226 - 4512, n=219, last 2 years)
-62%
Sequential Write 256KB
3590.55
257.28
-93%
3678.35
2%
2842.59
-21%
1893.63
-47%
3042 ?(1524 - 3678, n=19)
-15%
1115 ?(57.5 - 3678, n=219, last 2 years)
-69%
Random Read 4KB
449.73
156.16
-65%
415.68
-8%
413.21
-8%
437.12
-3%
416 ?(268 - 480, n=19)
-8%
247 ?(22.2 - 543, n=219, last 2 years)
-45%
Random Write 4KB
654.48
258.92
-60%
678.39
4%
505.72
-23%
181.55
-72%
530 ?(174.3 - 709, n=19)
-19%
271 ?(13 - 709, n=219, last 2 years)
-59%

游戏 - 游戏流畅，但大多只能达到 60 fps

配备 Adreno 750，Find X7 Ultra 采用了目前最强大的 GPU 之一，即使在高细节级别下也能轻松玩游戏。我们使用Gamebench 对可能的帧率进行了评估。以《源氏冲击》和《PUBG Mobile》为例进行评估。

至少在我们的测试游戏中，Oppo 无法充分利用其每秒 120 帧的最高帧率。不过，这并不是因为 Find X7 Ultra 的性能不够好，而是因为设置了 FPS 限制，这可能是出于省电的考虑。另一方面，《PUBG Mobile》和《Genshin Impact》在各自的最高图形设置下都能以 60 FPS 的速度流畅运行。PUBG Mobile》只提供了最低细节级别的 90 FPS 模式。

PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile
源泉冲击
源泉冲击
051015202530354045505560657075808590Tooltip
Oppo Find X7 Ultra; Genshin Impact; 4.5.0_21307647_21321795: Ø59.6 (56-61)
Oppo Find X7 Ultra; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 3.1.0: Ø89.6 (87-91)
Oppo Find X7 Ultra; PUBG Mobile; HD; 3.1.0: Ø59.7 (58-61)

排放 - Find X7 Ultra 拥有出色的立体声扬声器

温度

在我们的测试中，Find X7 Ultra 在负载情况下的最高发热温度为 44.3 °C（111.7 °F），温度明显偏高。但即便如此，这款智能手机的发热温度仍在正常范围内，完全不必担心。

由于 Find X7 Ultra 无法有效散热，节流仍是唯一的补救措施。在测试过程中，我们已经通过降低设置（仅 CPU）来运行 Burnout 基准的负载场景，让智能手机轻松应对，否则该应用程序就会因过热危险而终止。

Find X7 Ultra 的节流能力与其他智能手机不相上下。 骁龙 8 代 3也有同样的问题，并采用了相同的解决方案。在 3DMark 的 Wild Life 压力测试中，性能损失并不像 Honor Magic6 Pro和 三星Galaxy S24 Ultra.

Max. Load
 42.7 °C42.1 °C39.2 °C 
 43.8 °C44.3 °C41.7 °C 
 42.5 °C44 °C40.7 °C 
Maximum: 44.3 °C
Average: 42.3 °C
38.7 °C39.7 °C37.6 °C
39.5 °C38.6 °C36.6 °C
36.2 °C39.1 °C37.4 °C
Maximum: 39.7 °C
Average: 38.2 °C
Power Supply (max.)  29.6 °C | Room Temperature 21.6 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 42.3 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.3 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.7 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.3 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
78.9 % +47%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
78.8 % +47%
Oppo Find X7 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
53.6 %
Honor Magic6 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
46.7 % -13%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
46.1 % -14%
Oppo Find X6 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
36.7 % -32%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
76 % +38%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
65.4 % +19%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
56.4 % +3%
Oppo Find X7 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
55 %
Honor Magic6 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
48.1 % -13%
Oppo Find X6 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
34.1 % -38%
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
66.1 % +20%
Oppo Find X7 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
55.1 %
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
53.9 % -2%
Honor Magic6 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
47.8 % -13%
0102030405060708090100110120Tooltip
Oppo Find X7 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø23.9 (16.6-30.1)
Honor Magic6 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø23 (15-31.1)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø21.3 (17.6-31.2)
Oppo Find X7 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø82.4 (58.3-108.8)
Honor Magic6 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø74.2 (51.2-109.6)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø61 (47.5-102.9)
Honor Magic6 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø114.7 (110.2-116.7)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø87.8 (72-121.8)
Oppo Find X7 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø24.5 (16.2-29.2)
Honor Magic6 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø25.1 (14-29.2)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø21.1 (16.3-31.3)
Oppo Find X7 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø23 (15.8-28.6)
Honor Magic6 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø25.7 (13.8-28.9)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø17.6 (13.8-25.6)
Oppo Find X7 Ultra
Oppo Find X7 Ultra

发言人

Find X7 Ultra 的立体声扬声器可产生相对较好的音谱，在中等音量下可产生相当均衡的声音。尽管它们在最大音量时仍不会失真，但声音会变得相当尖锐，高音过于突出。

外接音频设备可通过 USB-C 线缆或蓝牙 5.4 连接到智能手机。Oppo 智能手机支持 AAC、SBC、LDAC 和 LDHC，以及 aptX、aptX HD、aptX TWS+ 和 aptX Adaptive 蓝牙编解码器。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.237.92530.733.53125.626.64026.731.25036.739.66324.630.28017.623.810018.728.912518.239.116015.951.720017.353.525015.256.931514.159.140013.459.350013.868.163014.367.980013.771.2100012.476125012.776.6160012.176.1200012.976.4250012.577.8315012.282.1400012.881.9500013.176.5630013.575.2800013.1731000013.772.6125001461.21600013.355.1SPL25.289.4N0.776.5median 13.5median 72.6Delta1.29.536.246.130.739.625.643.926.742.836.743.624.644.317.64618.743.218.245.715.956.617.356.115.260.214.160.413.461.313.866.514.367.713.774.912.478.112.778.612.177.212.981.612.584.612.284.112.88413.18413.578.513.176.913.7741466.813.36425.2930.792.2median 13.5median 74.91.210.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseOppo Find X7 UltraSamsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Oppo Find X7 Ultra audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 32% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (93 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.6% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 29% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 - 28 分钟内可完全充电

耗电量

Find X7 Ultra 的 5000 毫安时电池可以高达 50 瓦的功率进行无线充电，使用附带的充电器，充电功率可达 100 瓦。在我们的测试中，用这种方式为一块空电池完全充电需要 28 分钟，11 分钟后电池容量已达到 50%，20 分钟后达到 85%。Find X7 Ultra 还支持 10 瓦的反向无线充电。

我们没有发现这款 OPPO 智能手机的功耗有任何异常。负载下相对较高的数值是由于苛刻的 Burnout 基准测试所致。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.09 / 0.31 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1 / 1.49 / 1.54 Watt
Load midlight 11.4 / 11.63 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Oppo Find X7 Ultra
5000 mAh		Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
4422 mAh		Google Pixel 8 Pro
5050 mAh		Honor Magic6 Pro
5600 mAh		Oppo Find X6 Pro
5000 mAh		Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
5000 mAh		Sony Xperia 1 V
5000 mAh		Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
 		Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
14%
18%
8%
22%
-6%
-22%
16%
17%
Idle Minimum *
1
0.5
50%
0.63
37%
0.8
20%
0.87
13%
0.73
27%
1.52
-52%
0.818 ?(0.51 - 1, n=9)
18%
0.897 ?(0.42 - 2.37, n=162, last 2 years)
10%
Idle Average *
1.49
1.97
-32%
1.47
1%
1.32
11%
1.6
-7%
1.22
18%
2.16
-45%
1.196 ?(0.89 - 1.52, n=9)
20%
1.452 ?(0.69 - 4.26, n=162, last 2 years)
3%
Idle Maximum *
1.54
1.99
-29%
1.55
-1%
1.37
11%
1.68
-9%
1.34
13%
2.2
-43%
1.279 ?(0.91 - 1.6, n=9)
17%
1.629 ?(0.79 - 4.45, n=162, last 2 years)
-6%
Load Average *
11.4
3.36
71%
8.45
26%
11.62
-2%
3.65
68%
16.52
-45%
7.85
31%
9.25 ?(3.34 - 14.7, n=9)
19%
5.55 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=162, last 2 years)
51%
Load Maximum *
11.63
10.43
10%
8.63
26%
11.65
-0%
6.14
47%
16.58
-43%
11.57
1%
10.9 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=9)
6%
8.31 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=162, last 2 years)
29%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910111213141516171819Tooltip
Oppo Find X7 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø5.73 (0.752-11.6)
Honor Magic6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø6.75 (0.1675-19.9)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø7.63 (0.966-16.1)
Oppo Find X7 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.635 (0.576-1.216)
Honor Magic6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.949 (0.822-1.242)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.98 (0.924-1.218)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

0123456789101112131415Tooltip
Oppo Find X7 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø11.2 (10.4-11.4)
Honor Magic6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø10.5 (9.47-11.5)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø12.1 (9.83-15.6)
Oppo Find X7 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.635 (0.576-1.216)
Honor Magic6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.949 (0.822-1.242)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.98 (0.924-1.218)

电池寿命

在模拟网上冲浪的情况下，Find X7 Ultra 的续航时间接近 20 小时，而在持续循环播放高清视频的情况下，Oppo 智能手机的续航时间接近 32 小时。因此，它在我们的对比中取得了不错的成绩，运行时间与 三星Galaxy S24 Ultra.Find X7 Ultra 与前代产品相比有了很大改进，甚至超过了 谷歌 Pixel 8 Pro在这方面甚至超过了谷歌 Pixel 8 Pro。另一方面 Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max和 Honor Magic6 Pro的续航时间更长。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
38h 02min
WiFi Websurfing
19h 46min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
31h 37min
Load (maximum brightness)
3h 46min
Oppo Find X7 Ultra
5000 mAh		Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
4422 mAh		Google Pixel 8 Pro
5050 mAh		Honor Magic6 Pro
5600 mAh		Oppo Find X6 Pro
5000 mAh		Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
5000 mAh		Sony Xperia 1 V
5000 mAh
Battery Runtime
32%
-30%
23%
-12%
-4%
-45%
Reader / Idle
2282
3514
54%
1344
-41%
3519
54%
1729
-24%
2227
-2%
1321
-42%
H.264
1897
2013
6%
1122
-41%
2027
7%
1648
-13%
1922
1%
859
-55%
WiFi v1.3
1186
1163
-2%
760
-36%
1548
31%
936
-21%
1148
-3%
743
-37%
Load
226
384
70%
220
-3%
223
-1%
251
11%
202
-11%

Pros

+ 高品质机箱
+ 强大的设备
+ 极快的 SoC
+ 更新时间长达 5 年
+ 明亮的 120 Hz WQHD 显示屏
+ 出色的摄像系统
+ 包括 LTE 频段 20 和 28
+ 100 瓦快速充电
+ IP68 认证

Cons

- 仅提供进口版本
- 无德语版本
- 带刹车的 WiFi 7
- 全球定位系统存在缺陷
- 不支持 eSIM 卡
- 无 1TB 存储选项

关于 Oppo Find X7 Ultra 的评价

测试 Oppo Find X7 Ultra。测试机由 TradingShenzen.com 提供
测试 Oppo Find X7 Ultra。测试机由 TradingShenzen.com 提供

与前代产品一样，Oppo Find X7 Ultra 在德国也是小众产品，目前只能作为进口产品购买。但这款 6.82 英寸的智能手机完全不需要躲避竞争对手。

凭借出色的摄像头和强大的硬件，Find X7 Ultra 可与其他旗舰智能手机一较高下，如 Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max和 三星Galaxy S24 Ultra等旗舰智能手机相媲美，而价格却低得多。尽管它仍被官方保留在中国市场，但由于其广泛的移动频率支持（包括 LTE 频段 20），在德国使用它仍然没有任何问题。

Oppo Find X7 Ultra 拥有最好的智能手机摄像头之一，并使用了快如闪电的骁龙 8 代 3 硬件，但目前只能通过进口方式购买。

尽管在我们的测试中，快速的 120-Hz LTPO 面板并没有达到 Oppo 宣传的 4500 cd/m² 的最高亮度，但高达 1500 cd/m² 的亮度仍然很吸引人。

但令人遗憾的是，WiFi 7 模块的速度仍然远远落后于预期，而且不支持 eSIM。GPS 会产生一些明显的定位错误，但这有可能通过固件更新来弥补。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

价格和供应情况

OPPO Find X7 Ultra 的所有存储型号均可从TradingShenzhen 购买。为我们提供了测试机。在我们测试时，这些机型的起价约为 895 美元。

Oppo Find X7 Ultra - 04/08/2024 v7
Manuel Masiero

Chassis
90%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
95%
Connectivity
68 / 70 → 97%
Weight
88%
Battery
94%
Display
94%
Games Performance
75 / 64 → 100%
Application Performance
95 / 86 → 100%
Temperature
77%
Noise
100%
Audio
82 / 90 → 91%
Camera
84%
Average
85%
91%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

More articles related to this device

Oppo Find X7 Ultra (Find X7 Series)

Transparency

The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > Oppo Find X7 Ultra 评测 -Android 智能手机中的最佳摄像头？
Manuel Masiero, 2024-04-11 (Update: 2024-04-11)