Notebookcheck Logo

Oppo Find X5智能手机评论。拥有四位数价格标签的预算智能手机

仍然是溢价。 Find X5继承了Oppo旗舰Find X5 Pro智能手机的大部分功能,但价格却低得多。虽然你必须投资1000欧元左右,但总体上你会得到一个非常强大的高端捆绑产品的回报。
Manuel Masiero, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
5G Android Smartphone Touchscreen

奥普正在寻求将自己打造成一个高端品牌。该制造商为Find X5标出了1000欧元的价格,而这甚至不是当前系列的顶级机型。这一荣誉属于Find X5 Pro,它的官方价格又是300欧元。只有Find X5 Lite,在网上商店以不到500欧元的价格出售,是合理的便宜。
就像Find X5 Pro一样,Find X5也声称自己是高端产品,因为它继承了旗舰机的许多功能,因此在许多方面与旗舰机相当。一个例子是相机单元,它是与哈苏公司合作开发的。然而,与Find X5 Pro不同的是,Find X5没有搭载骁龙8代,而是 "仅 "搭载了骁龙888,但这为日常使用提供了足够的性能。

Oppo Find X5 (Find X5 Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G 8 x 1.8 - 2.8 GHz, Cortex-X1 / A78 / A55 (Kryo 680)
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 660
Memory
8192 MB 
Display
6.55 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 402 PPI, capacitive, AMOLED, FHD+, 10 Bit colour depth, Corning Gorilla Glass Victus, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 256 GB 
, 229.5 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Geomagnetic sensor, Ambient light sensor, Colour temperature sensor, Proximity sensor, Accelerometer, Gravity sensor, Gyroscope, Pedometer, Dolby Atmos, VoLTE, VoWiFi, eSIM, IP54 rating, Head SAR 0.992 W/kg, Body SAR 1.216 W/kg
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.2, 2G (850/900/1800/1900 MHz), 3G (Band 1/2/4/5/6/8/19), 4G (Band 1/2/3/4/5/7/8/12/13/17/18/19/20/25/26/28/32/34/38/39/40/41/66), 5G (n1/3/5/7/8/12/13/18/20/26/28/38/40/41/66/77/78), Dual SIM, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.7 x 160.3 x 72.6
Battery
4800 mAh
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 12
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix MP main camera (f/1.8, FOV 84°, 6P lens, AF, OIS) + 50MP Ultra-wide Angle Camera (f/2.2, FOV 110°, 7P lens, AF) + 13MP Telephoto camera (f/2.4, FOV 45°, 5P lens, AF), videos up to [email protected]
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix MP (f/2.4, FOV 81°, 5P), videos up to [email protected]
Additional features
Speakers: stereo, Keyboard: virtual, 80W Charger, USB Data Cable, USB Dongle (Type-A to Type-C), SIM Ejector Tool, Protective Case, Quick Start Guide, Safety Guide, ColorOS 12.1, 24 Months Warranty, fanless
Weight
196 g, Power Supply: 107 g
Price
999 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
87.8 %
04/2022
Oppo Find X5
SD 888 5G, Adreno 660
196 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.55"2400x1080
88.6 %
10/2021
Apple iPhone 13
A15, A15 GPU 4-Core
173 g128 GB NVMe6.10"2532x1170
87.7 %
03/2022
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730
196 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.70"2400x1080
87.1 %
03/2022
realme GT 2 Pro
SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730
189 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.70"3216x1440
86.8 %
10/2021
Sony Xperia 5 III
SD 888 5G, Adreno 660
168 g128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.10"2520x1080
87.5 %
03/2022
Xiaomi 12
SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730
179 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.28"2400x1080

外壳 - 全方位玻璃,哑光和天鹅绒后盖

Oppo Find X5是一项华而不实的技术。与Oppo Find X5 Pro不同,后盖不是由陶瓷制成,而是由玻璃制成。我们的评测样品采用哑光的白色后盖,看起来非常优雅,几乎没有留下指纹。由于其天鹅绒般的质地,表面也感觉非常优质。OPPO还提供黑色的智能手机。

背面最引人注目的设计特征是相机单元。它没有使用矩形边框,但它在右下角有一个轻微的向上倾斜。此外,后盖和镜头的组合似乎已经合并成一个单元。相机单元明显地、有形地从外壳中突出,但又弯曲到背面,这进一步加强了该智能手机整体质量高的初步印象。然而,Find X5在桌面上晃动得相当厉害,即使使用附带的保护罩也是如此。

Find X5的显示屏玻璃也是由大猩猩玻璃Victus制成的,但仍有工厂标准的保护膜覆盖。弯曲的屏幕边缘与金属框架无缝连接,将正面和背面牢牢固定在一起。总的来说,Find X5的高制造质量令人印象深刻,看起来就像由一块材料制成。然而,遗憾的是,Oppo没有对该智能手机进行IP认证。另一方面,根据IP68认证,Find X5 Pro具有防水和防尘功能。

尺寸比较

163.1 mm 76 mm 8.8 mm 196 g163.2 mm 74.7 mm 8.2 mm 189 g160.3 mm 72.6 mm 8.7 mm 196 g157 mm 68 mm 8.2 mm 168 g152.7 mm 69.9 mm 8.66 mm 179 g146.7 mm 71.5 mm 7.7 mm 173 g

硬件 - Oppo Find X5配备8GB内存和256GB存储空间

Oppo Find X5只有一种存储配置:8GB的LPDDR5内存和256GB的UFS 3.1存储。如果你减去Android 12、ColorOS 12.1和预装应用程序所占用的存储空间,实际可用的存储空间几乎达到230GB。由于缺乏microSD插槽,这无法扩展。

OPPO的智能手机没有3.5毫米插孔或FM收音机。相反,USB-C端口支持OTG以及USB 3.2 Gen.1,这意味着数据可以以5Gb/s的名义速率传输。许多竞争者会很好地注意到这一点,因为大多数设备,包括许多高价机型,都只能以USB 2.0速度运行。

我们的评测样品提供的USB电缆只支持USB 2.0,这不允许平均超过30MB/s。Find X5用USB 3.0电缆达到了承诺的USB 3.2 Gen.1速度。

左边:音量摇杆
左边:音量摇杆
左边:电源按钮
左边:电源按钮
顶部: 麦克风
顶部: 麦克风
底部。双SIM卡,麦克风,USB-C 3.2 Gen.1,扬声器
底部。双SIM卡,麦克风,USB-C 3.2 Gen.1,扬声器

软件 -Android 12和ColorOS 12.1

Oppo Find X5运行Android 12和制造商自己的ColorOS 12.1用户界面。在测试时(4月初),Android 安全补丁是2月1日的,因此仍然是相当最新的。

设计清晰的ColorOS 12.1以一些通常在标准Android 中缺乏的软件设置而脱颖而出,例如分屏视图。这可以通过三指滑动来激活,并在屏幕上同时显示两个应用程序。多屏连接功能允许智能手机在Windows PC上进行镜像和操作。

幸运的是,Oppo在Find X5上选择的软件产品很有节制。除了标准的谷歌应用程序和几个制造商工具,如手机管理器、克隆应用程序和指南针,只有少数第三方应用程序进入了ROM。这些应用程序,包括Facebook、Netflix、TikTok和AliExpress,都可以被卸载。

通信和GNSS - 快速WiFi,平均GPS

除了mmWave,Oppo的Find X5支持所有常见的移动网络标准,包括5G-SA(17个频段)和5G-NSA(13个频段),所以在任何地方都应该没有接收问题。

在WLAN方面,Find X5使用Wi-Fi 6,支持MIMO。连接到我们的华硕ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000参考路由器,它在发送和接收方向都实现了稳定和快速的传输速率,这与对比设备大致相当。NFC和蓝牙5.2也是Find X5的连接曲目的一部分。

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) 1 m 4M x10 GT-AXE11000
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
933 (833min - 949max) MBit/s ∼100% +18%
realme GT 2 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
862 (780min - 919max) MBit/s ∼92% +9%
Oppo Find X5
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
789 (351min - 863max) MBit/s ∼85%
Average of class Smartphone
  (72.5 - 1736, n=36, last 2 years)
704 MBit/s ∼75% -11%
iperf3 Client (transmit) 1 m 4M x10 GT-AXE11000
Oppo Find X5
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
976 (953min - 1017max) MBit/s ∼100%
realme GT 2 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
933 (826min - 963max) MBit/s ∼96% -4%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
898 (852min - 931max) MBit/s ∼92% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (78.3 - 1710, n=36, last 2 years)
716 MBit/s ∼73% -27%
055110165220275330385440495550605660715770825880935990Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) 1 m 4M x10 GT-AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø777 (351-863)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) 1 m 4M x10 GT-AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø976 (953-1017)
室内的GPS信号
室内的GPS信号
室外的GPS信号
室外的GPS信号

Oppo智能手机通过GPS、BeiDou、GLONASS、Galileo和QZSS确定其位置,但在每种情况下都仅限于一个频段。尽管如此,Oppo X5能够在几秒钟内确定其当前位置,在室内和室外的精确度都达到了3米(约10英尺)。

然而,我们最初对GPS系统的积极印象在我们的自行车旅行小测试中有点褪色。在有很多空地的路段上,Oppo X5的准确度与Garmin Venu 2同样出色,但在密集的建筑区,它有时会出现偏差。然而,它的整体性能应该足以满足谷歌地图等的日常导航。

GPS-测试:概述
GPS-测试:概述
GPS-测试:环湖
GPS-测试:环湖
GPS-测试:转折点
GPS-测试:转折点

电话功能和语音质量

Oppo Find X5在通话中提供良好的语音质量。我们与固定和移动网络的通话,双方总是能很好地理解。在扬声器模式下,声音听起来也很自然,由于有效的噪音抑制,基本上没有干扰。

两个纳米SIM卡适合Find X5。另外,这款智能手机也可以使用eSIM卡而不是实体卡。支持VoLTE和VoWiFi。

相机 - 与Find X5 Pro的设置几乎相同

用主摄像头拍照
用主摄像头拍照
用主摄像头拍照
用主摄像头拍照

Find X5使用的相机设置与顶级机型Oppo Find X5 Pro几乎相同。自拍相机为3200万像素,隐藏在集成在显示屏左上方的冲孔后面。它提供了良好的记录质量,以及众多过滤器和修饰效果。视频录制被限制在1080p。

奥普与哈苏公司合作开发了主摄像头设置。它包括一个5千万像素的广角和超广角相机(均采用索尼IMX 766芯片),以及一个13百万像素的长焦相机。与Find X5 Pro不同,Find X5的主摄像头使用的是两轴而不是五轴图像稳定器。为此,采用了MariSilicon X形式的相同图像处理NPU。

用Find X5拍摄的照片看起来非常好。颜色和对比度看起来很自然,图像清晰度在目标区域也运作良好。然而,在某些情况下,相机使用的白平衡略微偏冷,偶尔会遗漏图像中黑暗区域的细节。但在夜间,Find X5还是能够捕捉到大量的光线。

超广角相机几乎同样完成了它的工作,并提供了清晰的照片,在图像边缘只有极少的色差。同时,它也是一个微距相机,因此在高达4厘米(约1.6英寸)的对焦范围内工作。长焦相机也能提供良好的图像质量,但由于其2倍光学变焦,在使用选项上有些局限。

在视频录制过程中,可以以每秒60帧的速度录制最高4K的视频,你可以通过一个无级滑块在广角和超广角相机之间方便地切换。这里的图片质量也很好。

用自拍相机拍照
用自拍相机拍照
用超广角相机拍照
用超广角相机拍照
用主摄像头拍照
用主摄像头拍照

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Daylight 1Daylight 2Ultra wide-angle5x ZoomLowlight

在受控的照明条件下,Oppo Find X5非常准确地再现了色彩。即使在照度仅为1勒克斯的情况下,它也能清晰地捕捉到测试图表的所有细节,但难以对其进行锐利的聚焦。

ColorChecker
7.5 ∆E
1.5 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
5 ∆E
1.2 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
1.7 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
5 ∆E
2.1 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
1.3 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Oppo Find X5: 4.57 ∆E min: 1.16 - max: 9.12 ∆E
ColorChecker
20.3 ∆E
22 ∆E
21.9 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
24.6 ∆E
30.7 ∆E
25.6 ∆E
17.6 ∆E
17.5 ∆E
20.8 ∆E
27.2 ∆E
31.1 ∆E
19 ∆E
26.6 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
25.7 ∆E
22.8 ∆E
29.1 ∆E
27.7 ∆E
24.4 ∆E
26 ∆E
29 ∆E
22.1 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
ColorChecker Oppo Find X5: 23.39 ∆E min: 12.77 - max: 31.13 ∆E

配件和保修 - 80瓦的SUPERVOOC电源

在Find X5中,Oppo包括一个80瓦的快速充电器,一条USB数据线(C型到A型),一个SIM卡工具,一个保护套,一份快速启动指南,以及一份包含安全说明的宣传单。还包括一个OTG适配器。

Oppo Find X5有24个月的保修期。

输入设备和操作 - 光学指纹传感器和2D面部解锁

Find X5的电容式触摸屏以高达240赫兹的采样率工作,并对触摸输入作出准确的反应,无论在屏幕的哪个位置。这款智能手机配备了工厂标准的屏幕保护膜,在两个短边上几乎与触摸屏无缝贴合,但只覆盖了两个圆形长边上的弧度,直到约一半的弧度。当把Oppo拿在手里时,可以很容易地感觉到保护膜,过渡到触摸屏的感觉相当硬。

Find X5的生物识别认证是通过光学指纹传感器进行的,该传感器隐藏在显示屏下面。在测试中,它的功能可靠而迅速。第二种解锁方法是二维人脸识别,在明亮的环境下运行同样迅速。在黑暗中速度也很高,但识别命中率大大下降。然后,在足够明亮的显示屏下,人脸解锁通常非常可靠。

键盘 - 横向
键盘 - 横向
键盘 - 以上
键盘 - 以上

显示器 - AMOLED面板屏幕,120赫兹

子像素
子像素

Find X5的6.55英寸AMOLED屏幕分辨率为2400 x 1080像素,由Gorilla Glass Victus保护,刷新率为60或120 Hz。

根据制造商的说法,该屏幕应该达到1000cd/m²的峰值亮度,但在APL50测量中,最大813cd/m²的测试结果略显不足。尽管如此,在启用亮度传感器后,亮度确实不错,平均约为718 cd/m²。OPPO对显示区域的照度也非常好,达到95%。在没有亮度传感器的情况下,屏幕的最大亮度为500 cd/m²。在最低的亮度水平,它仍然以2.14 cd/m²的亮度闪耀。

在亮度低于55%的情况下,OLED的闪烁范围为120.2至371.3赫兹。在此之上,它保持恒定的120赫兹(当120赫兹刷新率被启用时)。

709
cd/m²
720
cd/m²
735
cd/m²
707
cd/m²
709
cd/m²
738
cd/m²
706
cd/m²
703
cd/m²
733
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 738 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 717.8 cd/m² Minimum: 2.14 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 95 %
Center on Battery: 709 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.3 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.4
ΔE Greyscale 1.3 | 0.64-98 Ø5.6
100% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.27
Oppo Find X5
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.55
Apple iPhone 13
OLED, 2532x1170, 6.10
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.70
realme GT 2 Pro
AMOLED, 3216x1440, 6.70
Sony Xperia 5 III
OLED, 2520x1080, 6.10
Xiaomi 12
OLED, 2400x1080, 6.28
Screen
21%
-1%
-94%
-72%
-17%
Brightness middle
709
831
17%
649
-8%
740
4%
554
-22%
867
22%
Brightness
718
830
16%
649
-10%
732
2%
559
-22%
867
21%
Brightness Distribution
95
98
3%
98
3%
98
3%
95
0%
98
3%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.3
0.77
41%
1.18
9%
3.25
-150%
2.22
-71%
1.7
-31%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
2.5
1.52
39%
2.07
17%
6.46
-158%
5.94
-138%
4.4
-76%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.3
1.2
8%
1.5
-15%
4.7
-262%
3.6
-177%
1.8
-38%
Gamma
2.27 97%
2.209 100%
2.236 98%
2.213 99%
2.193 100%
2.2 100%
CCT
6489 100%
6501 100%
2538 256%
5663 115%
7000 93%
6762 96%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 371.3 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 371.3 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 371.3 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 21940 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

最小显示亮度
最小显示亮度
25%的显示亮度
25%的显示亮度
50%的显示亮度
50%的显示亮度
自定义设置
自定义设置

在 "自然 "色彩模式下,AMOLED显示器被限制在sRGB色彩空间,而预设的 "鲜艳 "色彩模式则涵盖了更大的DCI-P3色彩空间。在我们的测试设备中,这种情况发生在98.7%,因此非常接近承诺的100%色彩空间覆盖。

Find X5在 "鲜艳 "色彩模式和调整后的色温下也实现了最佳的色彩再现(设置见截图)。色彩精度和温度以及RGB平衡都堪称典范。

色彩准确性(鲜艳的色彩模式,DCI-P3目标色彩空间)
色彩准确性(鲜艳的色彩模式,DCI-P3目标色彩空间)
色彩空间(生动的色彩模式,DCI-P3目标色彩空间)
色彩空间(生动的色彩模式,DCI-P3目标色彩空间)
灰度(鲜艳色彩模式,DCI-P3目标色彩空间)
灰度(鲜艳色彩模式,DCI-P3目标色彩空间)
饱和度(鲜艳色彩模式,DCI-P3目标色彩空间)
饱和度(鲜艳色彩模式,DCI-P3目标色彩空间)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
1.215 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.583 ms rise
↘ 0.632 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (23.4 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.034 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.49 ms rise
↘ 0.544 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.692 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (37 ms).

由于屏幕亮度高,Oppo Find X5可以在户外很好地使用。即使在阳光直射下,仍然可以识别内容,没有什么困难。

在户外的阴凉处
在户外的阴凉处
在户外阳光直射下
在户外阳光直射下
在户外的阴凉处
在户外的阴凉处

视角的稳定性得到了我们的好评。在非常平坦的视角下,显示屏的颜色会略微偏绿或偏蓝,这是典型的AMOLED,而且它还会失去一点亮度。然而,这两者对可读性几乎没有影响。

视角
视角

性能 - 配备骁龙888的Oppo Find X5

Find X5配备了骁龙888,这是目前最快的智能手机SoC之一。Adreno 660图形芯片也处于高端领域。加上8GB的LPDDR5内存和快速的UFS 3.1内存,Find X5以出色的系统性能给人留下了深刻印象,确保了日常使用中的短时加载和响应时间。

索尼的Xperia 5 III也配备了骁龙888,与Find X5进行了艰难的对决。Oppo在AnTuTu v9中取得了较大的分数优势,但与索尼不同的是,它在GFXBench中被限制在最高60FPS的水平。实际上,这两款智能手机的功率都非常大,以至于它们很难被任何应用程序发挥到极致。这也适用于使用骁龙8代的对比设备,在所有基准测试中,骁龙8代的计算速度仍比骁龙888快几个百分点。

Geekbench 5.3
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Apple iPhone 13
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 4-Core, 4096
1755 Points ∼100% +57%
realme GT 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1267 Points ∼72% +13%
Xiaomi 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
1237 Points ∼70% +10%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1195 Points ∼68% +7%
Sony Xperia 5 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
1137 Points ∼65% +1%
Oppo Find X5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
1121 Points ∼64%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (976 - 1198, n=27)
1118 Points ∼64% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (58 - 1755, n=262, last 2 years)
653 Points ∼37% -42%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Apple iPhone 13
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 4-Core, 4096
4820 Points ∼100% +43%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
3659 Points ∼76% +8%
realme GT 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
3641 Points ∼76% +8%
Xiaomi 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
3581 Points ∼74% +6%
Sony Xperia 5 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
3572 Points ∼74% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (3204 - 3810, n=27)
3571 Points ∼74% +6%
Oppo Find X5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
3376 Points ∼70%
Average of class Smartphone
  (248 - 4914, n=262, last 2 years)
2151 Points ∼45% -36%
Vulkan Score 5.3
realme GT 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
7199 Points ∼100% +46%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
6965 Points ∼97% +41%
Xiaomi 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
6541 Points ∼91% +33%
Oppo Find X5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
4924 Points ∼68%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (3894 - 6176, n=26)
4711 Points ∼65% -4%
Sony Xperia 5 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
4399 Points ∼61% -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (72 - 8702, n=200, last 2 years)
2485 Points ∼35% -50%
OpenCL Score 5.3
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
6291 Points ∼100% +35%
realme GT 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
6165 Points ∼98% +32%
Xiaomi 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
5972 Points ∼95% +28%
Sony Xperia 5 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
4673 Points ∼74% 0%
Oppo Find X5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
4671 Points ∼74%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (3100 - 4786, n=26)
4617 Points ∼73% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (255 - 9069, n=199, last 2 years)
2476 Points ∼39% -47%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Sony Xperia 5 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
14729 Points ∼100% +6%
Xiaomi 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
14508 Points ∼98% +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (11435 - 17085, n=21)
14307 Points ∼97% +3%
Oppo Find X5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
13913 Points ∼94%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
13611 Points ∼92% -2%
realme GT 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
12279 Points ∼83% -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4436 - 18567, n=133, last 2 years)
10130 Points ∼69% -27%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (7991 - 9221, n=3)
8422 Points ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 11256, n=196, last 2 years)
3417 Points ∼41%
Xiaomi 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
Points ∼0%
Oppo Find X5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
Points ∼0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (10111 - 13263, n=3)
11212 Points ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (54 - 16670, n=196, last 2 years)
3938 Points ∼35%
Xiaomi 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
Points ∼0%
Oppo Find X5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
Points ∼0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (4462 - 4609, n=3)
4556 Points ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (677 - 5301, n=196, last 2 years)
2845 Points ∼62%
Xiaomi 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
Points ∼0%
Oppo Find X5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
Points ∼0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited
Oppo Find X5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
11384 Points ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (8065 - 11534, n=20)
10135 Points ∼89% -11%
Xiaomi 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
9693 Points ∼85% -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (149 - 13121, n=240, last 2 years)
4809 Points ∼42% -58%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics
Xiaomi 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
24177 Points ∼100% +41%
Oppo Find X5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
17179 Points ∼71%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (10491 - 17179, n=20)
15130 Points ∼63% -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (122 - 31940, n=240, last 2 years)
6610 Points ∼27% -62%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics
Oppo Find X5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
5220 Points ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (2975 - 5434, n=20)
4760 Points ∼91% -9%
Xiaomi 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
3754 Points ∼72% -28%
Average of class Smartphone
  (651 - 6394, n=238, last 2 years)
3202 Points ∼61% -39%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (6140 - 7596, n=2)
6868 Points ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (78 - 9138, n=194, last 2 years)
2565 Points ∼37%
Xiaomi 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
Points ∼0%
Oppo Find X5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
Points ∼0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (6816 - 9436, n=2)
8126 Points ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (62 - 11573, n=194, last 2 years)
2675 Points ∼33%
Xiaomi 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
Points ∼0%
Oppo Find X5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
Points ∼0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (4514 - 4557, n=2)
4536 Points ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (688 - 5318, n=194, last 2 years)
2860 Points ∼63%
Xiaomi 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
Points ∼0%
Oppo Find X5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
Points ∼0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Xiaomi 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
10618 Points ∼100% +32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (6110 - 9839, n=21)
8532 Points ∼80% +6%
Oppo Find X5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
8029 Points ∼76%
Apple iPhone 13
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 4-Core, 4096
5713 Points ∼54% -29%
Average of class Smartphone
  (91 - 11528, n=244, last 2 years)
3936 Points ∼37% -51%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Xiaomi 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
18286 Points ∼100% +58%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (7930 - 12914, n=21)
11629 Points ∼64% 0%
Oppo Find X5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
11599 Points ∼63%
Apple iPhone 13
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 4-Core, 4096
9878 Points ∼54% -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (73 - 19364, n=244, last 2 years)
4838 Points ∼26% -58%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (2579 - 5366, n=21)
4511 Points ∼100% +17%
Xiaomi 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
4303 Points ∼95% +11%
Oppo Find X5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
3865 Points ∼86%
Average of class Smartphone
  (635 - 5793, n=244, last 2 years)
3212 Points ∼71% -17%
Apple iPhone 13
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 4-Core, 4096
2307 Points ∼51% -40%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited
Average of class Smartphone
  (426 - 6977, n=173, last 2 years)
2401 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
Points ∼0%
Oppo Find X5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
Points ∼0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics
Average of class Smartphone
  (349 - 11259, n=173, last 2 years)
2658 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
Points ∼0%
Oppo Find X5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
Points ∼0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics
Average of class Smartphone
  (1567 - 3958, n=173, last 2 years)
2576 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
Points ∼0%
Oppo Find X5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
Points ∼0%
Wild Life Score
Xiaomi 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
9713 Points ∼100% +65%
realme GT 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
9571 Points ∼99% +63%
Apple iPhone 13
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 4-Core, 4096
8788 Points ∼90% +50%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
6351 Points ∼65% +8%
Oppo Find X5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
5873 Points ∼60%
Sony Xperia 5 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
5787 Points ∼60% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (3958 - 5942, n=26)
5674 Points ∼58% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (216 - 10062, n=172, last 2 years)
3282 Points ∼34% -44%
Wild Life Unlimited Score
realme GT 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
10164 Points ∼100% +73%
Apple iPhone 13
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 4-Core, 4096
9979 Points ∼98% +69%
Xiaomi 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
9782 Points ∼96% +66%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
6483 Points ∼64% +10%
Oppo Find X5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
5888 Points ∼58%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (3959 - 5925, n=26)
5617 Points ∼55% -5%
Sony Xperia 5 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
5064 Points ∼50% -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (174 - 11700, n=170, last 2 years)
3370 Points ∼33% -43%
Wild Life Extreme
realme GT 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
2594 Points ∼100% +68%
Xiaomi 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
2586 Points ∼100% +68%
Apple iPhone 13
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 4-Core, 4096
2470 Points ∼95% +60%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1629 Points ∼63% +6%
Oppo Find X5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
1542 Points ∼59%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (1236 - 1602, n=21)
1516 Points ∼58% -2%
Sony Xperia 5 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
1456 Points ∼56% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (102 - 3080, n=124, last 2 years)
1000 Points ∼39% -35%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
realme GT 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
2545 Points ∼100% +66%
Xiaomi 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
2418 Points ∼95% +58%
Apple iPhone 13
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 4-Core, 4096
2313 Points ∼91% +51%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1567 Points ∼62% +2%
Oppo Find X5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
1535 Points ∼60%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (974 - 1564, n=21)
1421 Points ∼56% -7%
Sony Xperia 5 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
1256 Points ∼49% -18%
Average of class Smartphone
  (101 - 2864, n=121, last 2 years)
978 Points ∼38% -36%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
121 fps ∼100% +102%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
119 fps ∼98% +98%
Sony Xperia 5 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
117 fps ∼97% +95%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (60 - 143, n=20)
102.5 fps ∼85% +71%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.5 - 143, n=204, last 2 years)
67.4 fps ∼56% +12%
Apple iPhone 13
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 4-Core, 4096
60.1 fps ∼50% 0%
realme GT 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
60 fps ∼50% 0%
Oppo Find X5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
60 fps ∼50%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
428 fps ∼100% +46%
Apple iPhone 13
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 4-Core, 4096
416.3 fps ∼97% +42%
realme GT 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
380 fps ∼89% +29%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
306 fps ∼71% +4%
Oppo Find X5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
294 fps ∼69%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (173 - 294, n=20)
247 fps ∼58% -16%
Sony Xperia 5 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
202 fps ∼47% -31%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6 - 428, n=204, last 2 years)
133.7 fps ∼31% -55%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
121 fps ∼100% +95%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
119 fps ∼98% +92%
Sony Xperia 5 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
113 fps ∼93% +82%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (55 - 121, n=20)
93.9 fps ∼78% +51%
Oppo Find X5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
62 fps ∼51%
Apple iPhone 13
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 4-Core, 4096
60.2 fps ∼50% -3%
realme GT 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
60 fps ∼50% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.5 - 121, n=203, last 2 years)
54.5 fps ∼45% -12%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Apple iPhone 13
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 4-Core, 4096
217.4 fps ∼100% +21%
Xiaomi 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
213 fps ∼98% +18%
realme GT 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
194 fps ∼89% +8%
Oppo Find X5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
180 fps ∼83%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
158 fps ∼73% -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (101 - 180, n=20)
141.7 fps ∼65% -21%
Sony Xperia 5 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
129 fps ∼59% -28%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.4 - 251, n=204, last 2 years)
76.8 fps ∼35% -57%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
121 fps ∼100% +98%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
109 fps ∼90% +79%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (36 - 105, n=20)
71.5 fps ∼59% +17%
Oppo Find X5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
61 fps ∼50%
Apple iPhone 13
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 4-Core, 4096
60.1 fps ∼50% -1%
realme GT 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
60 fps ∼50% -2%
Sony Xperia 5 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
58 fps ∼48% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.1 - 121, n=203, last 2 years)
42.1 fps ∼35% -31%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
164 fps ∼100% +30%
realme GT 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
143 fps ∼87% +13%
Apple iPhone 13
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 4-Core, 4096
138.6 fps ∼85% +10%
Oppo Find X5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
126 fps ∼77%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
119 fps ∼73% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (69 - 126, n=20)
98.9 fps ∼60% -22%
Sony Xperia 5 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
71 fps ∼43% -44%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 169, n=204, last 2 years)
51.9 fps ∼32% -59%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen
Xiaomi 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
81 fps ∼100% +35%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
68 fps ∼84% +13%
Oppo Find X5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
60 fps ∼74%
Apple iPhone 13
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 4-Core, 4096
58.5 fps ∼72% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (26 - 61, n=20)
47.2 fps ∼58% -21%
realme GT 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
42 fps ∼52% -30%
Sony Xperia 5 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
39 fps ∼48% -35%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.3 - 81, n=203, last 2 years)
26.5 fps ∼33% -56%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen
Apple iPhone 13
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 4-Core, 4096
96.6 fps ∼100% +31%
realme GT 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
86 fps ∼89% +16%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
86 fps ∼89% +16%
Xiaomi 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
78 fps ∼81% +5%
Oppo Find X5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
74 fps ∼77%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (42 - 74, n=20)
60.6 fps ∼63% -18%
Sony Xperia 5 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
48 fps ∼50% -35%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.8 - 96.6, n=203, last 2 years)
31.4 fps ∼33% -58%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
98 fps ∼100% +63%
Xiaomi 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
93 fps ∼95% +55%
Oppo Find X5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
60 fps ∼61%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (32 - 73, n=26)
55.7 fps ∼57% -7%
realme GT 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
53 fps ∼54% -12%
Sony Xperia 5 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
45 fps ∼46% -25%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.5 - 98, n=259, last 2 years)
27.9 fps ∼28% -53%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Apple iPhone 13
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 4-Core, 4096
112.9 fps ∼100% +45%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
101 fps ∼89% +29%
realme GT 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
100 fps ∼89% +28%
Xiaomi 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
99 fps ∼88% +27%
Oppo Find X5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
78 fps ∼69%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (46 - 87, n=27)
70.4 fps ∼62% -10%
Sony Xperia 5 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
57 fps ∼50% -27%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2 - 257, n=260, last 2 years)
33.4 fps ∼30% -57%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
69 fps ∼100% +35%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
60 fps ∼87% +18%
Apple iPhone 13
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 4-Core, 4096
54.9 fps ∼80% +8%
Oppo Find X5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
51 fps ∼74%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (25 - 51, n=26)
38.5 fps ∼56% -25%
Sony Xperia 5 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
37 fps ∼54% -27%
realme GT 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
37 fps ∼54% -27%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.1 - 69, n=260, last 2 years)
19.1 fps ∼28% -63%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
42 fps ∼100% +45%
realme GT 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
41 fps ∼98% +41%
Xiaomi 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
39 fps ∼93% +34%
Apple iPhone 13
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 4-Core, 4096
37.2 fps ∼89% +28%
Oppo Find X5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
29 fps ∼69%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (19 - 32, n=26)
27.5 fps ∼65% -5%
Sony Xperia 5 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
23 fps ∼55% -21%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.7 - 101, n=260, last 2 years)
12.9 fps ∼31% -56%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Xiaomi 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
982789 Points ∼100% +19%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
970465 Points ∼99% +18%
realme GT 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
965911 Points ∼98% +17%
Oppo Find X5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
824694 Points ∼84%
Apple iPhone 13
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 4-Core, 4096
813876 Points ∼83% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (636471 - 824694, n=17)
767997 Points ∼78% -7%
Sony Xperia 5 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
714551 Points ∼73% -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (111952 - 1041980, n=102, last 2 years)
550205 Points ∼56% -33%
AImark - Score v2.x
Sony Xperia 5 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
261820 Points ∼100% +2%
Oppo Find X5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
257002 Points ∼98%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (171404 - 264766, n=15)
243759 Points ∼93% -5%
Apple iPhone 13
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 4-Core, 4096
105623 Points ∼40% -59%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4293 - 286905, n=121, last 2 years)
63547 Points ∼24% -75%
Xiaomi 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
6766 Points ∼3% -97%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
realme GT 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
7147 Points ∼100% +3%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
7070 Points ∼99% +2%
Oppo Find X5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
6921 Points ∼97%
Xiaomi 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
6860 Points ∼96% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (5839 - 6985, n=20)
6495 Points ∼91% -6%
Sony Xperia 5 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
6362 Points ∼89% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (895 - 8124, n=180, last 2 years)
4141 Points ∼58% -40%
System
Oppo Find X5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
11207 Points ∼100%
Sony Xperia 5 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
10927 Points ∼98% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (9119 - 11774, n=20)
10766 Points ∼96% -4%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
10739 Points ∼96% -4%
Xiaomi 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
10334 Points ∼92% -8%
realme GT 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
10247 Points ∼91% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1542 - 19657, n=180, last 2 years)
7351 Points ∼66% -34%
Memory
Oppo Find X5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
7610 Points ∼100%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
7357 Points ∼97% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (5352 - 9044, n=20)
7316 Points ∼96% -4%
Xiaomi 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
6535 Points ∼86% -14%
realme GT 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
6162 Points ∼81% -19%
Sony Xperia 5 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
5573 Points ∼73% -27%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1012 - 9044, n=180, last 2 years)
4782 Points ∼63% -37%
Graphics
realme GT 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
21885 Points ∼100% +48%
Xiaomi 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
18370 Points ∼84% +24%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
17159 Points ∼78% +16%
Sony Xperia 5 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
15739 Points ∼72% +7%
Oppo Find X5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
14770 Points ∼67%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (9399 - 15739, n=20)
13676 Points ∼62% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (478 - 25642, n=180, last 2 years)
7035 Points ∼32% -52%
Web
realme GT 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1888 Points ∼100% +4%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1843 Points ∼98% +1%
Sony Xperia 5 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
1827 Points ∼97% 0%
Oppo Find X5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
1822 Points ∼97%
Xiaomi 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
1785 Points ∼95% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (1434 - 1983, n=20)
1683 Points ∼89% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (718 - 2392, n=180, last 2 years)
1373 Points ∼73% -25%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 13 (Safari 15)
180 Points ∼100% +44%
Oppo Find X5 (Chrome 99.0.4844.73)
125.1 Points ∼70%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro (Chrome 99)
121.6 Points ∼68% -3%
Sony Xperia 5 III (Chrome93)
119.3 Points ∼66% -5%
Xiaomi 12 (Chrome 99.0.4844.58)
113.8 Points ∼63% -9%
realme GT 2 Pro (Chrome 99)
102.3 Points ∼57% -18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G (61.3 - 125.1, n=13)
96.1 Points ∼53% -23%
Average of class Smartphone (12.4 - 182.6, n=177, last 2 years)
60 Points ∼33% -52%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 13 (Safari 15)
399.8 Points ∼100% +83%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro (Chrome 99)
236.6 Points ∼59% +8%
Oppo Find X5 (Chrome 99.0.4844.73)
218.4 Points ∼55%
Xiaomi 12 (Chrome 99.0.4844.58)
209.7 Points ∼52% -4%
Sony Xperia 5 III (Chrome93)
209.3 Points ∼52% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G (77 - 223, n=19)
168.8 Points ∼42% -23%
realme GT 2 Pro (Chrome 99)
121.9 Points ∼30% -44%
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 414, n=184, last 2 years)
111.5 Points ∼28% -49%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPhone 13 (Safari 15)
244 runs/min ∼100% +102%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro (Chome 99)
129 runs/min ∼53% +7%
realme GT 2 Pro (Chome 99)
127 runs/min ∼52% +5%
Oppo Find X5 (Chrome 99.0.4844.73)
121 runs/min ∼50%
Xiaomi 12 (Chrome 99.0.4844.58)
107 runs/min ∼44% -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G (46.9 - 121, n=12)
84.1 runs/min ∼34% -30%
Average of class Smartphone (9 - 244, n=162, last 2 years)
59.4 runs/min ∼24% -51%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Apple iPhone 13 (Safari 15)
219 Points ∼100% +20%
Oppo Find X5 (Chrome 99.0.4844.73)
182 Points ∼83%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro (Chrome 99)
167 Points ∼76% -8%
Xiaomi 12 (Chrome 99.0.4844.58)
148 Points ∼68% -19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G (103 - 182, n=18)
143.1 Points ∼65% -21%
Average of class Smartphone (20 - 265, n=189, last 2 years)
90 Points ∼41% -51%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 13 (Safari 15)
62664 Points ∼100% +36%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro (Chrome 99)
50626 Points ∼81% +10%
Oppo Find X5 (Chrome 99.0.4844.73)
46054 Points ∼73%
Sony Xperia 5 III (Chrome93)
45930 Points ∼73% 0%
realme GT 2 Pro (Chrome 99)
37650 Points ∼60% -18%
Xiaomi 12 (Chrome 99.0.4844.58)
37279 Points ∼59% -19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G (23491 - 47543, n=20)
35591 Points ∼57% -23%
Average of class Smartphone (3526 - 65969, n=193, last 2 years)
22261 Points ∼36% -52%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (414 - 15230, n=195, last 2 years)
3271 ms * ∼100% -254%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G (891 - 1841, n=20)
1319 ms * ∼40% -43%
realme GT 2 Pro (Chrome 99)
1137 ms * ∼35% -23%
Xiaomi 12 (Chrome 99.0.4844.58)
930 ms * ∼28% -1%
Oppo Find X5 (Chrome 99.0.4844.73)
923 ms * ∼28%
Sony Xperia 5 III (Chrome93)
919 ms * ∼28% -0%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro (Chrome 99)
819 ms * ∼25% +11%
Apple iPhone 13 (Safari 15)
413.6 ms * ∼13% +55%

* ... smaller is better

Oppo Find X5Motorola Edge 30 Prorealme GT 2 ProSony Xperia 5 IIIXiaomi 12Average 256 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
14%
12%
-7%
41%
1%
-46%
Sequential Read 256KB
1964
1832
-7%
1749
-11%
1593
-19%
1851
-6%
1771 ?(1330 - 2037, n=42)
-10%
897 ?(45.6 - 2037, n=259, last 2 years)
-54%
Sequential Write 256KB
782
1028
31%
1225
57%
740
-5%
1417
81%
899 ?(452 - 1559, n=42)
15%
435 ?(11.9 - 1465, n=259, last 2 years)
-44%
Random Read 4KB
272.9
277.7
2%
273
0%
253.4
-7%
325.2
19%
260 ?(181 - 325, n=42)
-5%
159.3 ?(13.5 - 325, n=259, last 2 years)
-42%
Random Write 4KB
259.3
339.5
31%
264
2%
271.3
5%
437.5
69%
264 ?(218 - 449, n=43)
2%
151.6 ?(269 - 449, n=260, last 2 years)
-42%

游戏 - 强大的游戏智能手机

立体声扬声器,性能丰富,功能流畅的位置和运动传感器,以及精确的触摸屏。游戏在Find X5上很有趣。尽管激活了120赫兹的显示屏,我们的两个测试游戏。Armajet PUBG Mobile,无法以每秒30帧以上的速度运行。然而,在任何时候都没有出现性能下降或停滞现象。用我们的测试工具Gamebench确定的帧率实际上仍然固定在30FPS。

氩氦刀
氩氦刀
PUBG手机版
PUBG手机版
051015202530Tooltip
; Armajet; 1.61.6: Ø29.9 (27-31)
; PUBG Mobile; 1.8.0: Ø29.9 (28-31)

排放--尽管有节流,但有足够的性能

温度

Oppo Find X5的玻璃表面在使用中最高可加热到37.5°C(99.5°F),握在手里时不会感觉不舒服。然而,在内部,骁龙888一旦变得太热,其性能就会被扼杀。正如3DMark的Wild Life压力测试所示,这种情况发生得相当快。GFXBench可能会提供类似的结果,但不幸的是,该应用总是在显示结果之前关闭。

在日常使用中,降低的SoC性能是难以察觉的,因为在需求上仍然有足够的功率。然而,我们不得不在每次测试运行后让智能手机冷却一段时间,以获得尽可能好的基准分数,从而获得有意义的比较率,因为否则全功率不再可用。

Max. Load
 36.8 °C36.6 °C35 °C 
 37.4 °C35.3 °C34.5 °C 
 37.5 °C36.8 °C33.4 °C 
Maximum: 37.5 °C
Average: 35.9 °C
34.7 °C35.8 °C35.7 °C
33.8 °C34.8 °C35.6 °C
32.5 °C33.1 °C36.5 °C
Maximum: 36.5 °C
Average: 34.7 °C
Power Supply (max.)  28.2 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.9 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.5 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22 to 52.9 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.5 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.7 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Apple iPhone 13
A15 GPU 4-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
80.1 (44.5min) % ∼100% +45%
realme GT 2 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
63.6 (36.7min) % ∼79% +15%
Sony Xperia 5 III
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
63.2 (19.4min) % ∼79% +15%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
57.4 (34.3min) % ∼72% +4%
Oppo Find X5
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
55.1 (19.3min) % ∼69%
Xiaomi 12
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
46.3 (27.5min) % ∼58% -16%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Apple iPhone 13
A15 GPU 4-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
77 (12.3min) % ∼100% +20%
Oppo Find X5
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
64.4 (5.98min) % ∼84%
realme GT 2 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
63.7 (9.62min) % ∼83% -1%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
59.6 (9.21min) % ∼77% -7%
Sony Xperia 5 III
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
55.2 (5.08min) % ∼72% -14%
Xiaomi 12
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
% ∼0% -100%
0510152025303540455055Tooltip
Oppo Find X5 Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.8.1: Ø6.84 (5.98-9.29)
Apple iPhone 13 A15 GPU 4-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 0.0.0.0: Ø13.1 (12.3-16)
Motorola Edge 30 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.8.1: Ø10.9 (9.21-15.5)
realme GT 2 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.8.1: Ø10.2 (9.62-15.1)
Sony Xperia 5 III Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.5.1: Ø6.51 (5.08-9.2)
Oppo Find X5 Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø25.3 (19.3-35.1)
Apple iPhone 13 A15 GPU 4-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø47 (44.5-55.5)
Motorola Edge 30 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø38.6 (34.3-59.7)
realme GT 2 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø43.1 (36.7-57.7)
Sony Xperia 5 III Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø21.3 (19.4-30.7)
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø35.6 (27.5-59.4)

发言人

Find X5使用两个兼容Dolby Atmos的立体声扬声器,它们位于两个短边,可以相对大声地播放而不失真。然而,它们在中高音域的声音不是特别均匀,而且几乎完全省略了低音范围。

音频设备可以通过一个USB插口适配器连接到Oppo,通过蓝牙5.2实现无线连接。支持的蓝牙音频编解码器有SBC、AAC、aptX、aptX HD和LDAC。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs203533.8253032.43121.922.84022.827.85034.835.86324.324.48023.224.810027.823.512514.727.416020.940.520021.243.825017.550.431513.456.340014.160.150013.16563011.569.380013.174100011.773.7125011.874.416001374.1200012.177.3250012.179.7315012.380.3400012.580.450001378.1630013.274.6800013721000013.765.61250013.559.61600014.250.7SPL25.188.7N0.772.3median 13.1median 69.3Delta1.111.63536.23030.221.934.122.833.734.839.824.337.423.234.727.840.914.744.120.95521.253.617.559.813.460.814.160.413.169.111.571.513.171.711.777.811.878.91377.112.178.612.180.812.382.412.578.91379.113.280.91379.413.770.813.564.414.267.425.190.70.786.3median 13.1median 71.51.19.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseOppo Find X5Xiaomi 12
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Oppo Find X5 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 47% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 23%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 67% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Xiaomi 12 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 23%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 25% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

电池寿命 - 80瓦的充电功率和50瓦的无线充电

消耗功率

Find X5的电池电量很经济。与同样配备骁龙888的索尼Xperia 5 III相比,Oppo智能手机的耗电量有时在所有负载情况下都明显较低。

4800毫安时的电池可以通过附带的80瓦电源快速充电。在测试中,只花了40分钟就把空电池完全充满。Find X5还提供无线充电(30瓦)和反向无线充电(10瓦)。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.05 / 0.46 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.01 / 1.59 / 1.6 Watt
Load midlight 3.87 / 8.74 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Oppo Find X5
4800 mAh
Apple iPhone 13
3240 mAh
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
4800 mAh
realme GT 2 Pro
5000 mAh
Sony Xperia 5 III
4500 mAh
Xiaomi 12
4500 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
18%
-26%
-11%
-61%
-3%
-13%
-4%
Idle Minimum *
1.01
0.6
41%
1.2
-19%
1
1%
1.8
-78%
0.87
14%
1.066 ?(0.46 - 1.8, n=23)
-6%
0.915 ?(0.12 - 2.5, n=205, last 2 years)
9%
Idle Average *
1.59
1
37%
1.6
-1%
1.4
12%
2.6
-64%
1.7
-7%
1.58 ?(0.74 - 2.6, n=23)
1%
1.704 ?(0.65 - 3.6, n=205, last 2 years)
-7%
Idle Maximum *
1.6
1.3
19%
2.5
-56%
1.7
-6%
3.1
-94%
1.82
-14%
1.733 ?(0.78 - 3.1, n=23)
-8%
1.931 ?(0.69 - 4, n=205, last 2 years)
-21%
Load Average *
3.87
4.5
-16%
5.2
-34%
5.3
-37%
5.3
-37%
4.68
-21%
5.46 ?(3.87 - 6.7, n=23)
-41%
4.46 ?(2.1 - 7.74, n=205, last 2 years)
-15%
Load Maximum *
8.74
7.8
11%
10.4
-19%
11.1
-27%
11.5
-32%
7.41
15%
9.79 ?(5.89 - 11.7, n=23)
-12%
7.33 ?(3.56 - 11.9, n=205, last 2 years)
16%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

01234567891011121314Tooltip
Oppo Find X5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G: Ø5.04 (1.168-11.1)
Sony Xperia 5 III Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G: Ø7.8 (2.54-14.5)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

01234567891011121314Tooltip
Oppo Find X5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø10.6 (5.82-11.1)
Sony Xperia 5 III Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø12.8 (11.8-14.2)
Oppo Find X5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G; Idle 1min: Ø1.142 (1.071-1.319)
Sony Xperia 5 III Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G; Idle 1min: Ø2.59 (2.36-2.87)

电池寿命

有些智能手机即使在正常使用的情况下也必须每天充电,因为电池在第二天就没电了。Find X5在模拟网络浏览时的操作时间超过15小时,在视频播放时超过21小时,证明它不属于这一类。如果你大量使用Oppo,电池很可能在一天后就没电了。但在正常使用情况下,连续两天应该是可以的。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
34h 35min
WiFi Websurfing
15h 37min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
21h 34min
Load (maximum brightness)
3h 51min
Oppo Find X5
4800 mAh
Apple iPhone 13
3240 mAh
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
4800 mAh
realme GT 2 Pro
5000 mAh
Sony Xperia 5 III
4500 mAh
Xiaomi 12
4500 mAh
Battery Runtime
16%
-2%
6%
-22%
10%
Reader / Idle
2075
2734
32%
1985
-4%
2056
-1%
2558
23%
H.264
1294
1224
-5%
1006
-22%
1083
-16%
890
-31%
WiFi v1.3
937
1019
9%
816
-13%
1053
12%
727
-22%
760
-19%
Load
231
299
29%
306
32%
296
28%
385
67%

Pros

+ 高质量的做工
+ 明亮而真实的彩色AMOLED显示屏
+ 良好的摄像装置
+ 广泛的移动覆盖范围
+ 电池寿命长
+ 充电时间非常短

Cons

- 没有IP认证
- 无内存扩展可能
- 平均的GPS
- 负载下的节流

评语:高端,但有小妥协

测试Oppo Find X5。测试装置由德国Oppo公司提供。
测试Oppo Find X5。测试装置由德国Oppo公司提供。

官方称,Oppo的Find X5在Find X5 Pro面前扮演第二角色,但它的定位和旗舰智能手机一样好。

凭借哈苏相机装置,Find X5是该系列的奖杯模型。此外,它还具有明亮和色彩准确的AMOLED屏幕、长电池寿命、快速充电速度和良好的移动频率覆盖等优点。最后但并非最不重要的是,它以非常高质量的设计给人留下深刻印象。

Oppo Find X5是一款强大的高端智能手机,与Oppo Find X5 Pro接近。


Find X5只缺少一些小细节,使其无法成为 "真正的 "旗舰。没有IP认证,也没有扩展内存的选项。OPPO也不支持自适应刷新率。另一方面,我们不认为选择SoC是一个缺点。快如闪电的骁龙888不得不不时减少输出,但它不会像Find X5 Pro中稍快的骁龙8代那样与发热问题作斗争。

例如,Oppo的Find X5的替代品是索尼的Xperia 5 III,摩托罗拉的Edge 30 Pro,而在iOS方面,Apple's iPhone 13。

 

 

 

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

价格和可用性

Oppo Find X5的官方价格为999欧元。例如,包括亚马逊在内的网上商店,在测试时仍然列出相同的价格。

Oppo Find X5 - 04/07/2022 v7
Manuel Masiero

Chassis
91%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
95%
Connectivity
52 / 70 → 74%
Weight
88%
Battery
91%
Display
91%
Games Performance
56 / 64 → 88%
Application Performance
89 / 86 → 100%
Temperature
91%