Nothing Phone (2a) 评测--首款经济实惠的 Nothing 智能手机

Name: Nothing Phone (2a)
Brand: Nothing

一个光辉的榜样 迄今为止，Nothing 的智能手机一直都不便宜。Nothing Phone (2a)一举打破了这一记录。这款 6.7 英寸设备的起售价为 320 英镑，并保留了更昂贵的 Nothing Phone (2) 的许多硬件，包括标志性的 Glyph 界面。那么，这是否是一款物美价廉的高科技产品呢？让我们一探究竟。

Manuel Masiero, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 04/25/2024 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

5G Android Smartphone Touchscreen

无无手机 (1)和 Nothing Phone (2)Nothing Phone (3)--至少现在还没有。相反，制造商推出了Nothing Phone (2a)，它是Nothing Phone (2)的一个更经济实惠的型号。这款 6.7 英寸设备现在的起售价为 320 英镑，是目前最实惠的 Nothing 智能手机。

配备联发科 Dimensity 7200Nothing Phone (2a)是一款中端设备，配备了120Hz OLED面板、50万像素双摄像头、Wi-Fi 6和5000毫安时电池（可在45瓦功率下充电），以及Nothing Phone的典型特征，如带有背面LED条纹的Glyph界面和Nothing OS（基于Android 14）。

总之，Nothing Phone（2a）有很多优点。我们将在这次评测中探讨它是否足以在中端智能手机市场上留下深刻印象。作为该细分市场中最具视觉冲击力的手机，它肯定会获得一些分数。

Test device courtesy of Nothing Germany

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Nothing Phone (2a) (Phone Series)

Processor

MediaTek Dimensity 7200 8 x 2 - 2.8 GHz, Cortex-A715 / A510

Graphics adapter

ARM Mali-G610 MP4

Memory

12 GB

, LPDDR5

Display

6.70 inch 20:9, 2412 x 1084 pixel 394 PPI, capacitive, AMOLED, Corning Gorilla Glass 5, adaptive refresh rate 30-120 Hz, 240 Hz touch sampling rate, 2160 Hz PWM frequency, 1300 Nits max. brightness, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz

Storage

256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 256 GB

, 235 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: acceleration sensor, gyroscope, proximity sensor, digital compass, OTG

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.3, 2G (850/900/1800/1900 MHz), 3G (Band 1, 4, 5, 6, 8, 19), 4G (Band 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66), 5G (Band n1, n3, n5, n7, n8, n20, n28, n38, n40, n41, n66, n77, n78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 8.55 x 161.74 x 76.32

Battery

5000 mAh Lithium-Ion

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 14

Camera

Primary Camera: 50 MPix (f/1.88, 1/1.56", OIS & EIS, AF) + 50 MP ultrawide (f/2.2, 1/2.76", 114° FOV)
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix (f/2.2, 1/2.74")

Additional features

Speakers: dual, Keyboard: virtual, USB-C cable, SIM tool, safety information, warranty card, Nothing OS 2.5, 24 Months Warranty, DRM Widevine L1, Camera2 API Level 3, IP54 rating, Wi-Fi Direct, WiFi 2x2 MIMO and MU-MIMO, Head SAR 0.99 W/kg, Body SAR 1.29 W/kg, GNSS: GPS (L1), Glonass (L1), Galileo (L1) , Beidou (B1), QZSS (L1), fanless

Weight

190 g

Price

329 Euro

Links

Nothing homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Drive	Size	Resolution
86.9 %	04/2024	Nothing Phone (2a) Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4	190 g	256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.70"	2412x1084
87.1 %	06/2023	Google Pixel 7a Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7	193.5 g	128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.10"	2400x1080
87.4 %	08/2023	Nothing Phone (2) SD 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730	201.2 g	256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.70"	2412x1080
84.6 %	10/2023	Motorola Edge 40 Neo Dimensity 7030, Mali-G610 MP3	170 g	256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.55"	2400x1080
	03/2024	Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530	213 g	256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.60"	2340x1080
87.4 %	03/2024	Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4	204.5 g	512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.67"	2712x1220

案例 - 灵感来自纽约地铁

Nothing Phone (2a)有黑色、白色和乳白色三种颜色可供选择，重量为 190 克，尺寸几乎完全相同。 Nothing Phone (2).这主要是因为这款手机采用了不同的材料。虽然两款手机的显示屏都有大猩猩 5 号玻璃保护，但 Nothing Phone (2a) 的后盖不是玻璃，而是塑料。这种透明的后盖可以让用户看到下面的 Glyph 中间层，但也非常容易沾染指纹。

Nothing 缩小了 Glyph 界面的范围，但并不影响其功能。中央的双摄像头仿照一双眼睛设计，周围是 NFC 铜线圈，现在只有三条 LED 灯带显示通知。

后盖下方三分之二的区域像一块导线板，灵感来自纽约地铁地图的外观。这个区域没有灯光。就连顶部三分之一处的红色小方块也是暗色的，仅用于设计目的。

Nothing Phone (2a)的正面和背面通过一个铝制边框连接，据 Nothing 称，该边框完全由回收铝制成。边框上有一层塑料涂层，表面略微粗糙，可确保良好的握持感。

Nothing Phone (2a) 采用圆角设计，表面光滑（摄像头除外），有点像Apple iPhone 15 或 iPhone 15。三星Galaxy S23/S23+的设计语言。在做工方面，这款手机也不逊色于更昂贵的竞争对手，过渡干净利落，缝隙尺寸均匀，稳定性极佳。

IP54 认证证明 Nothing Phone (2a) 和 Nothing Phone (2) 一样，可以防止灰尘和水溅污染。

尺寸比较

Nothing Phone (2) Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G Nothing Phone (2a) Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Motorola Edge 40 Neo Google Pixel 7a DIN A6 ❌

连接性 - Nothing 手机最高可配备 12GB RAM 和 256GB 存储空间

Nothing Phone (2a) 有两种存储配置，购买者可以选择黑色或乳白色。白色的 Nothing Phone (2a) 只有较低的存储容量。

8 + 128 GB：319 英镑
12 + 256 GB：349 英镑

这款智能手机配备了两个 SIM 卡插槽，但不支持 eSIM，也没有 microSD 读卡器。USB-C 端口仅支持 USB 2.0 速度，因此基本上不具备图像输出功能。在使用外置三星 980 Pro SSD 复制内容时，我们测得的标准 USB 2.0 传输速率为 33.34 MB/s。

软件 - Nothing OS 2.5 基于Android 14

Nothing Phone (2a) 使用Nothing自己的用户界面Nothing OS 2.5，它基于Android 14。不过，用户也可以在设置手机时选择更经典的Android 外观，并可在设置中轻松切换两种用户界面设计。

除了特殊的外观，Nothing OS 2.5 本质上是一个纯粹的Android 系统。除了用于设置 Nothing Ear (2) 等 Nothing 耳机的 Nothing X 应用程序外，该操作系统没有预装任何第三方应用程序。

Nothing承诺在三年内（直到2027年）为Nothing Phone（2a）提供新的操作系统版本更新。Android 安全更新将提供更长的时间，直到2028年。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 具有隐藏功能的 WiFi 6

根据其技术规格，Nothing Phone (2a) 使用 WiFi 6，这意味着它只能连接到 2.4 和 5 GHz Wi-Fi 路由器。不过，我们在使用参考路由器华硕 ROG Rapture AXE1100 进行测试时，连接到 6 GHz 频段并没有遇到困难，尽管理论上这需要 Wi-Fi 6E。也许 Nothing 的规格并不完全正确。

在使用 6 GHz Wi-Fi 频段时，Nothing Phone (2a) 的最大传输速率（高达 917 MBit/s）高于使用 5 GHz 网络时的传输速率，后者的最大传输速率仅为 782 MBit/s。

Nothing Phone (2a) 在欧洲境内接收信号应该没有问题，前提是你不在信号死角。这款手机支持 17 个 4G 频率和 13 个 5G 频率，但这并不意味着它是全球旅行者的理想选择。在美国，Nothing Phone (2a) 目前仅作为美国开发者计划的一部分提供。.我们在测试过程中没有遇到信号质量问题。

Networking
Nothing Phone (2a)
iperf3 receive AXE11000	782 (min: 633) MBit/s ∼82%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	680 (min: 417) MBit/s ∼77%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	872 (min: 464) MBit/s ∼57%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	914 (min: 902) MBit/s ∼67%
Google Pixel 7a
iperf3 receive AXE11000	957 (min: 475) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	819 (min: 499) MBit/s ∼93%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	930 (min: 471) MBit/s ∼61%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	934 (min: 915) MBit/s ∼69%
Nothing Phone (2)
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1513 (min: 1097) MBit/s ∼98%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	799 (min: 577) MBit/s ∼59%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	878 (min: 686) MBit/s ∼57%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	668 (min: 436) MBit/s ∼49%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
iperf3 receive AXE11000	823 (min: 704) MBit/s ∼86%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	735 (min: 671) MBit/s ∼83%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
iperf3 receive AXE11000	848 (min: 445) MBit/s ∼89%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	881 (min: 669) MBit/s ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
iperf3 receive AXE11000	649 (min: 34.8) MBit/s ∼68%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	686 (min: 40.5) MBit/s ∼78%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1537 (min: 229) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1360 (min: 598) MBit/s ∼100%

Nothing Phone (2a) MediaTek Dimensity 7200, ARM Mali-G610 MP4; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø857 (464-957)

Nothing Phone (2) Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1513 (1097-1582)

Nothing Phone (2a) MediaTek Dimensity 7200, ARM Mali-G610 MP4; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø913 (902-925)

Nothing Phone (2) Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø799 (577-890)

Nothing Phone (2a) MediaTek Dimensity 7200, ARM Mali-G610 MP4; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø781 (633-873)

Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Samsung Exynos 1480, Samsung Xclipse 530; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø822 (704-841)

Nothing Phone (2a) MediaTek Dimensity 7200, ARM Mali-G610 MP4; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø680 (417-860)

Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Samsung Exynos 1480, Samsung Xclipse 530; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø735 (671-791)

Nothing Phone (2a) 支持所有主要的卫星导航服务，在室外能将我们精确定位在一米之内。

我们带着这款手机进行了一次 10 公里的自行车旅行，并将其与智能手表 Garmin Venu 2 进行了比较。Nothing Phone (2a) 与智能手表一样出色地记录了骑行路线，不过两款设备在某些方面的准确性都有待提高。总的来说，Phone (2a) 完全适合一般导航使用。

电话和语音质量

Nothing Phone (2a) 有一个双卡槽，可容纳两张 NanoSIM 卡，支持 VoLTE 和 Wi-Fi 通话。

Nothing 智能手机在语音质量方面表现出色。虽然有时很难捕捉到安静的声音，但即使在免提通话中也能清晰地传输语音。另一方面，即使在嘈杂的环境中，降噪功能也很可靠。

摄像头 - 5000 万像素双摄像头

与许多中端智能手机不同，Nothing Phone (2a) 没有使用三倍甚至四倍镜头，其中一个镜头通常只是一个装饰配件（是的，我们说的是微距摄像头）。相反，与 Nothing Phone (2) 一样，我们的手机只使用了两个摄像头。一个主摄像头（三星 GN9）和一个超广角摄像头（三星 JN1），分辨率均为 50MP。

在正常日光下，主摄像头拍摄的照片亮度分布均匀，动态效果好，图像清晰度高。不过，在某些情况下，相机软件会过度渲染色彩，使照片看起来非常饱和。不过，即使在弱光条件下，照片也很明亮，而且仍能显示出很多细节。

超广角摄像头与 Nothing Phone (2).不过，在 (2a) 中，由于采用了联发科 Dimensity 7200的信号处理能力较弱，无法与主摄像头相媲美。不过，这些照片的质量也不错，边缘的噪点相对较少。

主摄像头可录制高达 4K 和 30 FPS 的光学防抖视频。自动对焦和亮度调节效果良好，尤其是在明亮的光线条件下，视频效果更佳。

3200 万像素的前置摄像头能拍摄出细节丰富的生动照片，在人像模式下能产生不错的虚化效果，并能以 1080p 和最高 60 FPS 的速度录制视频。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Tageslicht-Aufnahme 1 Tageslicht-Aufnahme 2 Ultraweitwinkel 5-facher Zoom Lowlight-Aufnahme

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

我们的实验室测试表明，在最佳照明条件下，主摄像头可以非常准确地捕捉色彩。即使在 1 勒克斯的残余光照条件下，它仍能完整地捕捉测试图，尽管有些模糊。

ColorChecker Nothing Phone (2a): 6.71 ∆E min: 2.74 - max: 11.24 ∆E

配件和保修 - 充电器需额外付费

Nothing Phone (2a) 的扁平包装让人一眼就能看出，包装盒中不可能包含充电器。取而代之的是一条 USB-C 数据线、一个 SIM 卡工具和一本包含安全和保修信息的小册子。Nothing 网店出售保护套（25 英镑）、45 瓦充电器（35 英镑）和耳塞（99 英镑起）。

Nothing 在欧盟范围内提供 24 个月的保修服务。

输入设备和操作 - Nothing Phone (2a) 带光学指纹识别器

Nothing Phone (2a) 操作流畅。使用时，你不会注意到自己使用的是一款中端硬件的智能手机，因为导航菜单和使用应用程序的感觉与顶级设备一样流畅。只有在极少数情况下，你才会注意到短暂的延迟，但这不会影响整体印象。振动电机可提供精确的反馈。

这款智能手机通过光学指纹扫描仪支持生物识别认证，既快速又可靠。通过前置摄像头进行的人脸识别也是如此，不过它只使用二维图像，很容易被骗。

显示屏 - 120 赫兹 AMOLED，四位数亮度

Nothing Phone (2a) 的 AMOLED 面板采用 240 Hz 触摸采样率，分辨率为 2412 x 1084p（20:9 屏幕比例）。根据标准设置，刷新率会在 30 到 120 Hz 的范围内自动调整。如果用户愿意，也可以更改这些设置，坚持使用标准的 60 或 120 Hz。该显示器支持 HDR10、HDR10+ 和 HLG。

据 Nothing 称，AMOLED 面板的最大亮度为 1,300 尼特。我们测量的亮度并没有那么高，但显示屏仍然非常明亮。在纯白背景下，我们测得的平均亮度为 1042 尼特，最大亮度为 1070 尼特。APL18 测量（明暗区域均匀分布）和 HDR 测量的最大亮度水平相似，分别为 1023 尼特和 1041 尼特。最低亮度为 2.48 尼特。

AMOLED 面板以较低的 90 Hz 频率在整个亮度范围内非常均匀地闪烁。屏幕还使用 2160 Hz 的调光频率来平衡 PWM 闪烁。这样，即使对于敏感的用户来说，闪烁也不会成为问题，甚至几乎不会察觉。


1044 cd/m²	1051 cd/m²	1070 cd/m²
1036 cd/m²	1033 cd/m²	1051 cd/m²
1031 cd/m²	1023 cd/m²	1040 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3

Maximum: 1070 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1042.1 cd/m² Minimum: 2.48 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 96 %
Center on Battery: 1033 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 1.2 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
99.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.07

	Nothing Phone (2a) AMOLED, 2412x1084, 6.70	Google Pixel 7a OLED, 2400x1080, 6.10	Nothing Phone (2) OLED, 2412x1080, 6.70	Motorola Edge 40 Neo pOLED, 2400x1080, 6.55	Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.60	Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G AMOLED, 2712x1220, 6.67
Screen		-0%	0%	-35%	-7%	11%
Brightness middle	1033	1006 -3%	951 -8%	966 -6%	962 -7%	1240 20%
Brightness	1042	1010 -3%	948 -9%	957 -8%	967 -7%	1233 18%
Brightness Distribution	96	95 -1%	98 2%	97 1%	99 3%	98 2%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.6	1.1 31%	1 37%	1.87 -17%	1.6 -0%	1.1 31%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	2.5	2.5 -0%	2.2 12%	4.34 -74%	2.6 -4%	2.2 12%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	1.2	1.5 -25%	1.6 -33%	2.5 -108%	1.5 -25%	1.4 -17%
Gamma	2.07 ^106%	2.25 ^98%	2.203 ^100%	2.272 ^97%	2.13 ^103%	2.21 ^100%
CCT	6482 ^100%	6531 ^100%	6516 ^100%	6582 ^99%	6382 ^102%	6669 ^97%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

90 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 90 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 90 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17853 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

使用固定变焦级别和不同亮度设置进行测量

我们使用分光光度计和卡尔曼分析软件进行的测量显示，屏幕可以非常准确地再现色彩和灰度。当显示设置中的色彩配置文件设置为标准而不是预设的鲜艳时，AMOLED 面板的图像质量最佳。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
1.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.645 ms rise
1.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.7525 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
0.79 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.3385 ms rise
0.79 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.455 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

显示屏视角稳定，在室外使用时能迅速适应光线条件的变化。即使在非常明亮的阳光下，我们阅读屏幕也没有问题。我们不建议停用亮度传感器，因为我们只能手动将亮度提高到 687 尼特。

性能 - 配备联发科技 Dimensity 7200 的 Nothing Phone (2a)

Nothing Phone (2a) 配备了MediaTek Dimensity 7200 ，这是一款 4 纳米 SoC，运行 2 个 ARM Cortex A715 性能内核，主频高达 2.8 GHz。第二个集群由 6 个 ARM Cortex A510 节能内核组成，最高时钟频率可达 2 GHz。

八核 SoC 使 Nothing Phone (2a) 能够提供稳定的中端性能。不过，它的竞争对手如

谷歌 Pixel 7a、三星Galaxy A55 和小米Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G的速度更快一些。

Geekbench 6.2
Single-Core
Nothing Phone (2) Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	1719 Points +52%
Google Pixel 7a Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192	1428 Points +27%
Average of class Smartphone (193 - 2930, n=108, last 2 years)	1372 Points +22%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192	1157 Points +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288	1147 Points +2%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7200 (1128 - 1147, n=2)	1138 Points +1%
Nothing Phone (2a) MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288	1128 Points
Motorola Edge 40 Neo MediaTek Dimensity 7030, Mali-G610 MP3, 12288	893 Points -21%
Multi-Core
Nothing Phone (2) Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	4584 Points +77%
Average of class Smartphone (845 - 7408, n=108, last 2 years)	3793 Points +46%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192	3456 Points +33%
Google Pixel 7a Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192	3383 Points +31%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288	2715 Points +5%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7200 (2592 - 2715, n=2)	2654 Points +2%
Nothing Phone (2a) MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288	2592 Points
Motorola Edge 40 Neo MediaTek Dimensity 7030, Mali-G610 MP3, 12288	2214 Points -15%

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Nothing Phone (2) Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	1255 Points +41%
Google Pixel 7a Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192	1036 Points +16%
Average of class Smartphone (119 - 2138, n=219, last 2 years)	913 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192	891 Points 0%
Nothing Phone (2a) MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288	890 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7200 (887 - 890, n=2)	889 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288	887 Points 0%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo MediaTek Dimensity 7030, Mali-G610 MP3, 12288	789 Points -11%
Multi-Core
Nothing Phone (2) Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	4045 Points +86%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192	3349 Points +54%
Google Pixel 7a Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192	3093 Points +42%
Average of class Smartphone (473 - 6681, n=219, last 2 years)	2997 Points +38%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288	2521 Points +16%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7200 (2177 - 2521, n=2)	2349 Points +8%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo MediaTek Dimensity 7030, Mali-G610 MP3, 12288	2197 Points +1%
Nothing Phone (2a) MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288	2177 Points

Antutu v10 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (281399 - 2162423, n=52, last 2 years)	1240541 Points +79%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288	767738 Points +11%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192	740935 Points +7%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7200 (693939 - 767738, n=2)	730839 Points +5%
Nothing Phone (2a) MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288	693939 Points

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Nothing Phone (2) Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	16612 Points +52%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo MediaTek Dimensity 7030, Mali-G610 MP3, 12288	15195 Points +39%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192	13393 Points +23%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288	12313 Points +13%
Average of class Smartphone (4761 - 21385, n=214, last 2 years)	11807 Points +8%
Google Pixel 7a Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192	11736 Points +7%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7200 (10924 - 12313, n=2)	11619 Points +6%
Nothing Phone (2a) MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288	10924 Points

CrossMark - Overall
Nothing Phone (2) Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	1116 Points +61%
Google Pixel 7a Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192	934 Points +34%
Average of class Smartphone (200 - 1474, n=164, last 2 years)	842 Points +21%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192	784 Points +13%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo MediaTek Dimensity 7030, Mali-G610 MP3, 12288	713 Points +3%
Nothing Phone (2a) MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288	695 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7200 (686 - 695, n=2)	691 Points -1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288	686 Points -1%

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Nothing Phone (2) Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	7839 Points +90%
Average of class Smartphone (411 - 11438, n=164, last 2 years)	5798 Points +41%
Google Pixel 7a Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192	5751 Points +40%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288	5192 Points +26%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192	4964 Points +21%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7200 (4115 - 5192, n=2)	4654 Points +13%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo MediaTek Dimensity 7030, Mali-G610 MP3, 12288	4152 Points +1%
Nothing Phone (2a) MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288	4115 Points
System
Nothing Phone (2) Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	12171 Points +81%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192	11778 Points +75%
Average of class Smartphone (2376 - 16475, n=164, last 2 years)	9727 Points +44%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288	9366 Points +39%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7200 (6734 - 9366, n=2)	8050 Points +20%
Google Pixel 7a Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192	7803 Points +16%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo MediaTek Dimensity 7030, Mali-G610 MP3, 12288	7550 Points +12%
Nothing Phone (2a) MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288	6734 Points
Memory
Nothing Phone (2) Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	8458 Points +85%
Average of class Smartphone (670 - 12716, n=164, last 2 years)	6310 Points +38%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288	5847 Points +28%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo MediaTek Dimensity 7030, Mali-G610 MP3, 12288	5742 Points +26%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7200 (4567 - 5847, n=2)	5207 Points +14%
Google Pixel 7a Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192	5126 Points +12%
Nothing Phone (2a) MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288	4567 Points
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192	4109 Points -10%
Graphics
Nothing Phone (2) Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	19110 Points +80%
Google Pixel 7a Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192	15766 Points +48%
Average of class Smartphone (697 - 58651, n=164, last 2 years)	14354 Points +35%
Nothing Phone (2a) MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288	10646 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7200 (10386 - 10646, n=2)	10516 Points -1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288	10386 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192	8511 Points -20%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo MediaTek Dimensity 7030, Mali-G610 MP3, 12288	5178 Points -51%
Web
Nothing Phone (2) Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	1919 Points +119%
Google Pixel 7a Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192	1734 Points +98%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 2145, n=164, last 2 years)	1500 Points +71%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192	1474 Points +68%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo MediaTek Dimensity 7030, Mali-G610 MP3, 12288	1324 Points +51%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288	1278 Points +46%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7200 (876 - 1278, n=2)	1077 Points +23%
Nothing Phone (2a) MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288	876 Points

UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Google Pixel 7a Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192	43053 Points +64%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288	28870 Points +10%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7200 (26315 - 28870, n=2)	27593 Points +5%
Nothing Phone (2a) MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288	26315 Points
Motorola Edge 40 Neo MediaTek Dimensity 7030, Mali-G610 MP3, 12288	22528 Points -14%
Average of class Smartphone (207 - 84787, n=149, last 2 years)	21932 Points -17%
Nothing Phone (2) Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	13807 Points -48%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192	5205 Points -80%

AImark - Score v3.x
Nothing Phone (2) Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	128240 Points +1024%
Average of class Smartphone (298 - 245629, n=105, last 2 years)	17833 Points +56%
Nothing Phone (2a) MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288	11407 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7200 ()	11407 Points 0%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo MediaTek Dimensity 7030, Mali-G610 MP3, 12288	8006 Points -30%
Google Pixel 7a Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192	805 Points -93%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192	585 Points -95%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288	Points -100%

GFXBench Car Chase 屏幕测试表明，Nothing Phone (2a) 还能够流畅地显示图形要求较高的游戏，这要归功于它的 ARM Mali-G610 MP4图形处理器。如果智能手机没有设置 FPS 限制，在许多图形基准测试中每秒帧数都可能超过 60 帧。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Wild Life Score | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Nothing Phone (2) Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2538 Points +120%
Google Pixel 7a Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1832 Points +58%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1202 Points +4%
Nothing Phone (2a) Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1156 Points
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	915 Points -21%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo Mali-G610 MP3, Dimensity 7030, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	693 Points -40%

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Nothing Phone (2) Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2754 Points +139%
Google Pixel 7a Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1860 Points +61%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1191 Points +3%
Nothing Phone (2a) Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1153 Points
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	926 Points -20%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo Mali-G610 MP3, Dimensity 7030, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	698 Points -39%

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Google Pixel 7a Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6855 Points +61%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4483 Points +5%
Nothing Phone (2a) Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4259 Points
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	3992 Points -6%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo Mali-G610 MP3, Dimensity 7030, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2583 Points -39%

3DMark / Wild Life Score
Google Pixel 7a Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6557 Points +58%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4336 Points +5%
Nothing Phone (2a) Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4140 Points
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	3897 Points -6%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo Mali-G610 MP3, Dimensity 7030, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2593 Points -37%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	5850 Points +46%
Google Pixel 7a Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4267 Points +7%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo Mali-G610 MP3, Dimensity 7030, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4053 Points +1%
Nothing Phone (2a) Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4006 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	3833 Points -4%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Google Pixel 7a Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	10121 Points +46%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	7275 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	7170 Points +3%
Nothing Phone (2a) Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6935 Points
Motorola Edge 40 Neo Mali-G610 MP3, Dimensity 7030, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4258 Points -39%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Google Pixel 7a Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	7756 Points +30%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6828 Points +14%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6065 Points +2%
Nothing Phone (2a) Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	5966 Points
Motorola Edge 40 Neo Mali-G610 MP3, Dimensity 7030, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4211 Points -29%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	114 fps +90%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	111 fps +85%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo Mali-G610 MP3, Dimensity 7030, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	96 fps +60%
Google Pixel 7a Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	90 fps +50%
Nothing Phone (2) Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps 0%
Nothing Phone (2a) Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Nothing Phone (2) Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	349 fps +119%
Google Pixel 7a Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	248 fps +56%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	191 fps +20%
Nothing Phone (2a) Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	159 fps
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	134 fps -16%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo Mali-G610 MP3, Dimensity 7030, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	117 fps -26%

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Google Pixel 7a Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	90 fps +50%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	81 fps +35%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	81 fps +35%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo Mali-G610 MP3, Dimensity 7030, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	65 fps +8%
Nothing Phone (2) Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps 0%
Nothing Phone (2a) Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Nothing Phone (2) Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	211 fps +115%
Google Pixel 7a Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	134 fps +37%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	111 fps +13%
Nothing Phone (2a) Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	98 fps
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	95 fps -3%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo Mali-G610 MP3, Dimensity 7030, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	71 fps -28%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Nothing Phone (2) Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps +5%
Nothing Phone (2a) Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	57 fps
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	57 fps 0%
Google Pixel 7a Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	56 fps -2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	52 fps -9%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo Mali-G610 MP3, Dimensity 7030, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	42 fps -26%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Nothing Phone (2) Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	134 fps +100%
Google Pixel 7a Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	97 fps +45%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	73 fps +9%
Nothing Phone (2a) Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	67 fps
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	67 fps 0%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo Mali-G610 MP3, Dimensity 7030, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	49 fps -27%

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Nothing Phone (2) Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	59 fps +74%
Google Pixel 7a Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	54 fps +59%
Nothing Phone (2a) Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	34 fps
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	32 fps -6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	31 fps -9%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo Mali-G610 MP3, Dimensity 7030, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	22 fps -35%

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Nothing Phone (2) Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	76 fps +90%
Google Pixel 7a Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	64 fps +60%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	44 fps +10%
Nothing Phone (2a) Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	40 fps
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	36 fps -10%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo Mali-G610 MP3, Dimensity 7030, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	26 fps -35%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Nothing Phone (2) Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	59 fps +79%
Google Pixel 7a Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	44 fps +33%
Nothing Phone (2a) Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	33 fps
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	27 fps -18%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	26 fps -21%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo Mali-G610 MP3, Dimensity 7030, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	18 fps -45%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Nothing Phone (2) Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	42 fps +100%
Google Pixel 7a Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	27 fps +29%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	22 fps +5%
Nothing Phone (2a) Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	21 fps
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	19 fps -10%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo Mali-G610 MP3, Dimensity 7030, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	12 fps -43%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Nothing Phone (2) Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps +25%
Google Pixel 7a Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	51 fps +6%
Nothing Phone (2a) Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	48 fps
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	42 fps -12%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	38 fps -21%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo Mali-G610 MP3, Dimensity 7030, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	28 fps -42%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Nothing Phone (2) Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	113 fps +113%
Google Pixel 7a Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	56 fps +6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	54 fps +2%
Nothing Phone (2a) Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	53 fps
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	49 fps -8%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo Mali-G610 MP3, Dimensity 7030, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	32 fps -40%

GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Nothing Phone (2) Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	20 fps +113%
Google Pixel 7a Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	13 fps +38%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	9.5 fps +1%
Nothing Phone (2a) Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	9.4 fps
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	7.9 fps -16%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo Mali-G610 MP3, Dimensity 7030, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	5.3 fps -44%

使用 Nothing Phone (2a) 浏览网页与执行其他操作一样快速流畅。不过，浏览器基准测试并没有证实这种感觉，因此这款智能手机在我们的对比设备中处于中下水平。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Nothing Phone (2) (Chrome 114)	178.548 Points +133%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G (Chrome 123)	131.393 Points +71%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 351, n=172, last 2 years)	107 Points +40%
Google Pixel 7a (Chrome 114)	104.662 Points +37%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo (Chrome 118)	102.38 Points +34%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G (Chrome 122.0.6261.90)	83.784 Points +9%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7200 (76.6 - 83.8, n=2)	80.2 Points +5%
Nothing Phone (2a) (Firefox 124.2.0)	76.624 Points

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Nothing Phone (2) (Chrome 114)	162 runs/min +56%
Google Pixel 7a (Chrome 114)	125 runs/min +20%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G (Chrome 123)	116 runs/min +12%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G (Chrome 122.0.6261.90)	112 runs/min +8%
Average of class Smartphone (14.9 - 445, n=156, last 2 years)	108.3 runs/min +4%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7200 (104 - 112, n=2)	108 runs/min +4%
Nothing Phone (2a) (Chrome 123.0.6312.99)	104 runs/min
Motorola Edge 40 Neo (Chrome 118)	91.6 runs/min -12%

WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Nothing Phone (2) (Chrome 114)	147 Points +18%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G (Chrome 123)	126 Points +1%
Nothing Phone (2a) (Firefox 124.2.0)	125 Points
Google Pixel 7a (Chrome 114)	111 Points -11%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo (Chrome 118)	106 Points -15%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7200 (86 - 125, n=2)	105.5 Points -16%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 202, n=161, last 2 years)	100.2 Points -20%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G (Chrome 122.0.6261.90)	86 Points -31%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Nothing Phone (2) (Chrome 114)	204 Points +10%
Nothing Phone (2a) (Firefox 124.2.0)	185 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7200 (92 - 185, n=2)	138.5 Points -25%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G (Chrome 123)	135 Points -27%
Average of class Smartphone (39 - 304, n=120, last 2 years)	134.4 Points -27%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo (Chrome 118)	121 Points -35%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G (Chrome 122.0.6261.90)	92 Points -50%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Nothing Phone (2) (Chrome 114)	52931 Points +185%
Google Pixel 7a (Chrome 114)	44948 Points +142%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G (Chrome 123)	41576 Points +124%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G (Chrome 122.0.6261.90)	39060 Points +110%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo (Chrome 118)	34140 Points +84%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 89112, n=215, last 2 years)	33395 Points +80%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7200 (18562 - 39060, n=2)	28811 Points +55%
Nothing Phone (2a) (Firefox 124.2.0)	18562 Points

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Nothing Phone (2a) (Firefox 124.2.0)	1569.6 ms *
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=172, last 2 years)	1551 ms * +1%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7200 (1296 - 1570, n=2)	1433 ms * +9%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo (Chrome 118)	1299.1 ms * +17%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G (Chrome 122.0.6261.90)	1296.2 ms * +17%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G (Chrome 123)	1012.6 ms * +35%
Google Pixel 7a (Chrome 114)	919.6 ms * +41%
Nothing Phone (2) (Chrome 114)	755.5 ms * +52%

* ... smaller is better

Nothing Phone (2a) 的 UFS 3.1 存储设备具有非常标准的性能。应用程序运行流畅，数据传输不费时。

	Nothing Phone (2a)	Google Pixel 7a	Nothing Phone (2)	Motorola Edge 40 Neo	Samsung Galaxy A55 5G	Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G	Average 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		8%	46%	-3%	6%	36%	23%	11%
Sequential Read 256KB	1028.37	1624.39 58%	1949.5 90%	1004.4 -2%	1688.53 64%	1921.64 87%	1759 ?(1004 - 2037, n=88) 71%	1513 ?(226 - 4512, n=218, last 2 years) 47%
Sequential Write 256KB	952	996.44 5%	1517.6 59%	930.9 -2%	831.44 -13%	1702.4 79%	1130 ?(452 - 1873, n=88) 19%	1121 ?(57.5 - 3678, n=218, last 2 years) 18%
Random Read 4KB	273.19	229.44 -16%	287.5 5%	279.5 2%	351.47 29%	248.21 -9%	282 ?(173.5 - 543, n=88) 3%	248 ?(22.2 - 543, n=218, last 2 years) -9%
Random Write 4KB	311.8	263.81 -15%	403.8 30%	284.1 -9%	132.11 -58%	265.29 -15%	309 ?(132.1 - 499, n=89) -1%	273 ?(13 - 709, n=218, last 2 years) -12%

游戏 - 几乎保证流畅运行

Gamebench应用程序可以帮助我们评估 Nothing Phone (2a) 的游戏性能。这款手机在玩《源氏冲击》时表现出色，在最大设置下玩这款对图形要求极高的游戏时，平均帧数为 34.6 FPS。在测试过程中，帧数偶尔会下降，但很快就能恢复。同样，《Asphalt 9: Legends》也能以 59 FPS 的速度带来更流畅的体验。

战术射击游戏《PUBG Mobile》对我们的智能手机没有任何影响。在高清设置下，它可能无法达到 40 FPS 以上，但这只是因为《PUBG Mobile》不允许在此设置下达到更高的帧率。

Nothing Phone (2a); Asphalt 9: Legends; 4.5.1b: Ø59 (37-61)

Nothing Phone (2a); Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps; 4.6.0_22174900_22378599: Ø48.7 (30-58)

Nothing Phone (2a); Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps; 4.5.0_21307647_21321795: Ø34.6 (19-50)

Nothing Phone (2a); PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 3.1.0: Ø59.3 (55-61)

Nothing Phone (2a); PUBG Mobile; Balanced; 3.1.0: Ø39.7 (24-41)

Nothing Phone (2a); PUBG Mobile; HD; 3.1.0: Ø39.6 (35-40)

排放 - 按下按钮即可实现最高性能

温度

Nothing Phone (2a) 在满载情况下确实会明显发热，但拿着它不会感到不舒服。在进行了一小时的压力测试（Burnout 基准）后，我们测得的最高表面温度为 42.8 °C。

Nothing Phone (2a) 在内部散热方面也很出色。我们通过 3DMark 进行的 Wild Life 压力测试表明，即使在连续负载的情况下，它也几乎可以始终提供完整的性能。

Max. Load

Idle


42.8 °C	39.2 °C	36.3 °C
41.8 °C	41.5 °C	38.7 °C
41 °C	40.6 °C	38.2 °C

Maximum: 42.8 °C
Average: 40 °C


37.6 °C	38.9 °C	41.6 °C
37.3 °C	38.7 °C	41.6 °C
36 °C	39 °C	39.6 °C

Maximum: 41.6 °C
Average: 38.9 °C

Room Temperature 21.6 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.8 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.6 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.2 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life stress test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	99.7 % +1%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo Mali-G610 MP3, Dimensity 7030, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	99.3 % 0%
Nothing Phone (2a) Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	99.2 %
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	99 % 0%
Nothing Phone (2) Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60.2 % -39%
Google Pixel 7a Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	54.3 % -45%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Nothing Phone (2a) Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	99.6 %
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	99.5 % 0%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo Mali-G610 MP3, Dimensity 7030, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	99.4 % 0%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	98.9 % -1%
Nothing Phone (2) Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	87.3 % -12%
Google Pixel 7a Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60.6 % -39%

Nothing Phone (2a) Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø6.89 (6.88-6.91)

Google Pixel 7a Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø8.32 (6.73-11.1)

Nothing Phone (2) Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø10.3 (10.2-11.6)

Motorola Edge 40 Neo Mali-G610 MP3, Dimensity 7030, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø4.17 (4.16-4.18)

Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø5.59 (5.56-5.63)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø7.07 (7.05-7.08)

Nothing Phone (2a) Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø24.7 (24.6-24.8)

Google Pixel 7a Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø27.2 (21.4-39.5)

Nothing Phone (2) Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø48.1 (38.2-63.4)

Motorola Edge 40 Neo Mali-G610 MP3, Dimensity 7030, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø15.4 (15.4-15.5)

Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø23.1 (23.1-23.1)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø25.6 (25.4-25.7)

Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø23.7 (23.6-23.7)

发言人

Nothing Phone (2a) 配备了立体声扬声器，在中高音域提供了相当均衡的声音特性，尤其适合传送声音。不过，正如预期的那样，低音音量不足。

用户可以通过 USB-C 或蓝牙 5.3 连接外部音频设备。Nothing Phone (2a) 支持当前广泛的蓝牙编解码器，包括 SBC、AAC、aptX、aptX HD、LDAC、Opus 和 LHDC V3/V4。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Nothing Phone (2a) audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 32% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy A55 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.4% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.5% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 29% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 - 中等偏上

能源消耗

Nothing Phone (2a) 的消耗率非常低，特别是在负载情况下非常节能。

通过 USB PD 3.0，Nothing Phone 的充电功率可达 45 W。由于手机不附带充电器，因此购买者必须自行准备一个合适的充电器。

使用来自 Ugreen 的 65 瓦充电器为手机充满电需要 1 小时。电池电量在 24 分钟内达到 50%，45 分钟后达到 90%。智能手机不支持无线充电。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.15 / 0.22 Watt
Idle	0.81 / 2.01 / 2.07 Watt
Load	4.16 / 7.91 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Nothing Phone (2a) 5000 mAh	Google Pixel 7a 4385 mAh	Nothing Phone (2) 4700 mAh	Motorola Edge 40 Neo 5000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A55 5G 5000 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G 5000 mAh	Average MediaTek Dimensity 7200	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		8%	3%	3%	-6%	-23%	-11%	-0%
Idle Minimum *	0.81	0.62 23%	0.9 -11%	1 -23%	0.85 -5%	1.22 -51%	1.015 ?(0.81 - 1.22, n=2) -25%	0.897 ?(0.42 - 2.37, n=162, last 2 years) -11%
Idle Average *	2.01	0.87 57%	1.1 45%	1.2 40%	1.51 25%	1.47 27%	1.74 ?(1.47 - 2.01, n=2) 13%	1.453 ?(0.69 - 4.26, n=162, last 2 years) 28%
Idle Maximum *	2.07	0.95 54%	1.4 32%	1.3 37%	1.71 17%	1.58 24%	1.825 ?(1.58 - 2.07, n=2) 12%	1.626 ?(0.79 - 4.45, n=162, last 2 years) 21%
Load Average *	4.16	6.11 -47%	5 -20%	5.2 -25%	4.87 -17%	8.09 -94%	6.13 ?(4.16 - 8.09, n=2) -47%	5.56 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=162, last 2 years) -34%
Load Maximum *	7.91	11.81 -49%	10.4 -31%	9.2 -16%	11.73 -48%	9.49 -20%	8.7 ?(7.91 - 9.49, n=2) -10%	8.35 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=162, last 2 years) -6%

* ... smaller is better

Energy consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Nothing Phone (2a) MediaTek Dimensity 7200; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø3.58 (0.875-6.87)

Nothing Phone (2) Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø3.53 (0.873-10.8)

Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Samsung Exynos 1480; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø4.37 (1.064-10.1)

Nothing Phone (2a) MediaTek Dimensity 7200; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.058 (0.954-1.125)

Nothing Phone (2) Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.994 (0.902-1.14)

Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Samsung Exynos 1480; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.242 (1.109-1.603)

Energy consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

Nothing Phone (2a) MediaTek Dimensity 7200; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø4.26 (3.93-4.62)

Nothing Phone (2) Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø10.7 (10.3-11.2)

Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Samsung Exynos 1480; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø5.21 (4.99-5.9)

Nothing Phone (2a) MediaTek Dimensity 7200; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.058 (0.954-1.125)

Nothing Phone (2) Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.994 (0.902-1.14)

Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Samsung Exynos 1480; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.242 (1.109-1.603)

电池寿命

为了尽可能真实地确定电池使用时间，Nothing Phone (2a) 必须进行两项标准化测试，每项测试都将屏幕亮度设置为 150 cd/m²。

这款智能手机的模拟网上冲浪时间长达近 17 个小时，远远领先于同类设备。在第二项电池测试中，当连续循环播放高清视频时，也取得了同样的结果。在这项测试中，Nothing Phone (2a) 的电池直到超过 25 小时后才耗尽，这也是高于平均水平的结果。因此，在实际使用中，即使不使用电源插座，这款智能手机也能轻松续航一到两天。

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		42h 02min
WiFi Websurfing		16h 51min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		25h 13min
Load (maximum brightness)		4h 53min

	Nothing Phone (2a) 5000 mAh	Google Pixel 7a 4385 mAh	Nothing Phone (2) 4700 mAh	Motorola Edge 40 Neo 5000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A55 5G 5000 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G 5000 mAh
Battery Runtime		-25%	-17%	-4%	-8%	-15%
Reader / Idle	2522	1328 -47%	1744 -31%	2444 -3%	2202 -13%	1586 -37%
H.264	1513	1224 -19%	1245 -18%	1232 -19%	1511 0%	937 -38%
WiFi v1.3	1011	821 -19%	909 -10%	864 -15%	1077 7%	913 -10%
Load	293	252 -14%	268 -9%	355 21%	220 -25%	373 27%

Pros

+ 明亮的 120 赫兹显示屏

+ 反应灵敏的系统

+ Android 14 年和 3 年操作系统升级

+ 良好的主摄像头

+ 个性化设计

+ 电池续航时间长

Cons

- 不支持 eSIM 卡

- 不支持无线充电

- 不含充电器

关于 "Nothing Phone "的评论 (2a)

回顾：Nothing Phone (2a)。测试设备由德国 Nothing 公司提供

Nothing 依然坚持其设计语言，推出了迄今为止最经济实惠的智能手机。Nothing Phone (2a) 的透明后盖和嵌入式 Glyph 界面让人眼前一亮。再加上强大的连接功能，这款智能手机在技术方面可能无法超越中端竞争对手，但绝对物超所值。

Nothing Phone (2a) 拥有令人印象深刻的 120-Hz AMOLED 面板，亮度达到四位数，色彩出色。它的其他优势还包括电池续航时间长、双摄像头（符合中档手机标准）以及出色的性能，不仅能满足日常需求，还能支持要求苛刻的手机游戏。我们还对这款手机的做工竖起了大拇指。

采用 Glyph 界面的 Nothing Phone (2a) 不仅引人注目，而且在连接性和性能方面也不会让人失望。

当然，Nothing 必须做出一些削减，才能使其最新款智能手机如此经济实惠。最明显的区别是塑料后盖容易留下指纹和划痕。Nothing Phone (2a) 不支持 eSIMS 或无线充电，而且不带充电器。

Nothing Phone (2a) 的替代产品包括谷歌 Pixel 7a、三星Galaxy A55 和小米Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G.这三款手机的价格范围相同，提供的连接功能也相似。与 Nothing 手机不同的是，它们还完全具备防尘防水功能。

价格和供应情况

Nothing Phone (2a) 可在Nothing 网上商店购买，起价为 320 美元。起价为 320 美元。在美国，Nothing Phone (2a) 目前仅作为美国开发者计划的一部分提供。

Nothing Phone (2a) - 2024-04-24 04/24/2024 v7
Manuel Masiero

Chassis

85%

Keyboard

67 / 75 → 89%

Pointing Device

89%

Connectivity

53 / 70 → 76%

Weight

89%

Battery

92%

Display

93%

Games Performance

57 / 64 → 89%

Application Performance

82 / 86 → 95%

Temperature

88%

Noise

100%

Audio

81 / 90 → 90%

Camera

75%

Average

81%

87%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Katherine Bodner - Translator - 311 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2017

contact me via: LinkedIn

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 391930 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > Nothing Phone (2a) 评测--首款经济实惠的 Nothing 智能手机

Manuel Masiero, 2024-04-25 (Update: 2024-04-25)

Nothing Phone (2a) 评测--首款经济实惠的 Nothing 智能手机

潜在的竞争对手比较

案例 - 灵感来自纽约地铁

尺寸比较

连接性 - Nothing 手机最高可配备 12GB RAM 和 256GB 存储空间

软件 - Nothing OS 2.5 基于Android 14

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 具有隐藏功能的 WiFi 6

电话和语音质量

摄像头 - 5000 万像素双摄像头

配件和保修 - 充电器需额外付费

输入设备和操作 - Nothing Phone (2a) 带光学指纹识别器

显示屏 - 120 赫兹 AMOLED，四位数亮度

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

性能 - 配备联发科技 Dimensity 7200 的 Nothing Phone (2a)

游戏 - 几乎保证流畅运行

排放 - 按下按钮即可实现最高性能

温度

3DMark Wild Life stress test

发言人

Nothing Phone (2a) audio analysis

Samsung Galaxy A55 5G audio analysis

电池寿命 - 中等偏上

能源消耗

Energy consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Energy consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

电池寿命

Pros

Cons

关于 "Nothing Phone "的评论 (2a)

价格和供应情况

More articles related to this device

Transparency

Pricecompare