摩托罗拉Moto G Pro智能手机评测：廉价手写笔
Motorola Moto G Pro (Moto G Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 8 x 2.2 GHz, Kryo 260
Graphics adapter
Memory
4096 MB
Display
6.40 inch 19.2:9, 2300 x 1080 pixel 399 PPI, capacitive, IPS, FHD+, glossy: yes
Storage
128 GB eMMC Flash, 128 GB
, 109.2 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5毫米耳机插孔, Card Reader: 最大512 GB的microSD, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 加速计，陀螺仪，接近传感器，环境光传感器，传感器集线器，指纹传感器, Wi-Fi Direct
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM (band 2, 3, 5, 8), UMTS (band 1, 2, 4, 5, 8), LTE (band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71), head SAR 1.52 W/kg, body SAR 1.58 W/kg, Dual SIM, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 9.2 x 158.6 x 75.8
Battery
4000 mAh Lithium-Ion
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 10
Camera
Primary Camera: 48 MPix 48 MP（f / 1.7，1.6 µm）+ 16 MP广角镜头（f / 2.2，2.0 µm）+ 2-MP微距镜头（f / 2.2），激光自动对焦，视频分辨率高达UHD @ 30FPS
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix f / 2.0，1 µm，视频，最高全高清@ 30FPS
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix f / 2.0，1 µm，视频，最高全高清@ 30FPS
Additional features
Speakers: 杜比立体声扬声器, Keyboard: 虚拟, 触控笔，模块化18瓦充电器，USB电缆（Type-C至Type-A），SIM卡工具，快速入门指南，保修信息, Android One, 24 Months Warranty, fanless
Weight
192 g, Power Supply: 35 g
Links
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
Competing Devices
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 77 % | 10/2020 | Motorola Moto G Pro SD 665, Adreno 610 | 192 g | 128 GB eMMC Flash | 6.40" | 2300x1080 | |
| 79 % | 11/2019 | Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T SD 665, Adreno 610 | 200 g | 64 GB eMMC Flash | 6.30" | 2340x1080 | |
| 78 % | 05/2020 | Motorola Moto G8 Power SD 665, Adreno 610 | 197 g | 64 GB eMMC Flash | 6.40" | 2300x1080 | |
| 82 % | 02/2020 | Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18 | 199 g | 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.70" | 2400x1080 | |
| 80 % | 07/2018 | LG Q Stylus MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2 | 172 g | 32 GB eMMC Flash | 6.20" | 2160x1080 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
| Networking | |
| iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite | |
| Motorola Moto G Pro | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T | |
| Average of class Smartphone (5.9 - 1414, n=641) | |
| LG Q Stylus | |
| Motorola Moto G8 Power | |
| iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite | |
| Motorola Moto G Pro | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T | |
| Average of class Smartphone (9.4 - 1599, n=641) | |
| Motorola Moto G8 Power | |
| LG Q Stylus | |
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø329 (313-345)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø334 (326-340)
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Daylight scene 1Daylight scene 2Low-light environment
25.2 ∆E
41 ∆E
30.8 ∆E
30.6 ∆E
32.6 ∆E
42.7 ∆E
40.3 ∆E
25.5 ∆E
27.8 ∆E
22.7 ∆E
46.3 ∆E
49.3 ∆E
23 ∆E
36.8 ∆E
23.5 ∆E
49.6 ∆E
29.6 ∆E
33.1 ∆E
41.2 ∆E
44.6 ∆E
41.8 ∆E
33.2 ∆E
23 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
16.4 ∆E
12.6 ∆E
17.2 ∆E
15.9 ∆E
15.6 ∆E
11.5 ∆E
15.5 ∆E
14.5 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
9 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
14.8 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
10.9 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
1.6 ∆E
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 743 cd/m² Average: 731.7 cd/m² Minimum: 7.2 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 735 cd/m²
Contrast: 1470:1 (Black: 0.5 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.84 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.7
ΔE Greyscale 5.9 | 0.64-98 Ø5.9
92.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.342
| Motorola Moto G Pro IPS, 2300x1080, 6.40 | Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T IPS, 2340x1080, 6.30 | Motorola Moto G8 Power IPS, 2300x1080, 6.40 | Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.70 | LG Q Stylus IPS, 2160x1080, 6.20 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 11% | -19% | -16% | -7% | |
| Brightness middle | 735 | 628 -15% | 462 -37% | 510 -31% | 458 -38% |
| Brightness | 732 | 631 -14% | 483 -34% | 536 -27% | 441 -40% |
| Brightness Distribution | 97 | 93 -4% | 93 -4% | 91 -6% | 94 -3% |
| Black Level * | 0.5 | 0.54 -8% | 0.65 -30% | 0.51 -2% | |
| Contrast | 1470 | 1163 -21% | 711 -52% | 898 -39% | |
| Colorchecker DeltaE2000 * | 5.84 | 2 66% | 5.7 2% | 6.6 -13% | 4.5 23% |
| Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. * | 10.2 | 5.1 50% | 8.9 13% | 17.56 -72% | 7.1 30% |
| Greyscale DeltaE2000 * | 5.9 | 3.7 37% | 6.5 -10% | 2.9 51% | 5.1 14% |
| Gamma | 2.342 94% | 2.17 101% | 2.303 96% | 2.242 98% | 2.33 94% |
| CCT | 7897 82% | 6230 104% | 8073 81% | 6989 93% | 7381 88% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 59.52 Hz | ≤ 15 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 59.52 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 15 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 59.52 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use. In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9725 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 20 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 9 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 11 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 24 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.4 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 19 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 23 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 55 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (38.7 ms). | ||
Geekbench 5.3 | PCMark for Android | 3DMark | GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | GFXBench 3.0 | GFXBench 3.1 | GFXBench | AnTuTu v8 | BaseMark OS II
| Geekbench 5.3 | |
| Vulkan Score 5.1 (sort by value) | |
| Motorola Moto G Pro | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T | |
| Motorola Moto G8 Power | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (432 - 483, n=5) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (70 - 4043, n=67) | |
| OpenCL Score 5.1 (sort by value) | |
| Motorola Moto G Pro | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T | |
| Motorola Moto G8 Power | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (363 - 368, n=5) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (272 - 4739, n=62) | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Motorola Moto G Pro | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T | |
| Motorola Moto G8 Power | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (1256 - 1421, n=8) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (248 - 4201, n=170) | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Motorola Moto G Pro | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T | |
| Motorola Moto G8 Power | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (309 - 314, n=8) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (63 - 1604, n=170) | |
| PCMark for Android | |
| Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
| Motorola Moto G Pro | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T | |
| Motorola Moto G8 Power | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (6189 - 11432, n=12) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (82 - 15299, n=567) | |
| Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| Motorola Moto G Pro | |
| Motorola Moto G8 Power | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite | |
| LG Q Stylus | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (7437 - 9051, n=10) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (1077 - 19989, n=716) | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
| 1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value) | |
| Motorola Moto G Pro | |
| Motorola Moto G8 Power | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite | |
| LG Q Stylus | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (35 - 37, n=10) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (0.5 - 322, n=834) | |
| T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value) | |
| Motorola Moto G Pro | |
| Motorola Moto G8 Power | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite | |
| LG Q Stylus | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (30 - 52, n=10) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (1 - 142, n=843) | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
| Motorola Moto G Pro | |
| Motorola Moto G8 Power | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite | |
| LG Q Stylus | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (19 - 20, n=10) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (0.8 - 180, n=739) | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
| Motorola Moto G Pro | |
| Motorola Moto G8 Power | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite | |
| LG Q Stylus | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (15 - 34, n=10) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (1.2 - 117, n=747) | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Motorola Moto G Pro | |
| Motorola Moto G8 Power | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite | |
| LG Q Stylus | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (13 - 13, n=10) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (0.87 - 117, n=602) | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Motorola Moto G Pro | |
| Motorola Moto G8 Power | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite | |
| LG Q Stylus | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (10 - 27, n=10) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (1.2 - 110, n=604) | |
| AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Motorola Moto G Pro | |
| Motorola Moto G8 Power | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (167305 - 181432, n=9) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (53335 - 624727, n=152) | |
| BaseMark OS II | |
| Web (sort by value) | |
| Motorola Moto G Pro | |
| Motorola Moto G8 Power | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite | |
| LG Q Stylus | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (926 - 1400, n=9) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (7 - 2169, n=764) | |
| Graphics (sort by value) | |
| Motorola Moto G Pro | |
| Motorola Moto G8 Power | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite | |
| LG Q Stylus | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (1881 - 1932, n=9) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (18 - 16996, n=764) | |
| Memory (sort by value) | |
| Motorola Moto G Pro | |
| Motorola Moto G8 Power | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite | |
| LG Q Stylus | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (1804 - 3174, n=9) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (21 - 8874, n=764) | |
| System (sort by value) | |
| Motorola Moto G Pro | |
| Motorola Moto G8 Power | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite | |
| LG Q Stylus | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (4391 - 5089, n=9) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (369 - 14189, n=764) | |
| Overall (sort by value) | |
| Motorola Moto G Pro | |
| Motorola Moto G8 Power | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite | |
| LG Q Stylus | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (2001 - 2556, n=9) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (1 - 6402, n=764) | |
| Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 161, n=226) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite (Chrome 80) | |
| Motorola Moto G Pro (Chrome 83.0.4103.106) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (22.9 - 31.2, n=6) | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite (Chrome 80) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (10 - 375, n=659) | |
| Motorola Moto G Pro (Chrome 83.0.4103.106) | |
| Motorola Moto G8 Power (Chrome 80) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (33.4 - 51, n=8) | |
| LG Q Stylus (hrome 69) | |
| Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
| Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 196, n=205) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite (Chome 80) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (25.4 - 30.8, n=6) | |
| Motorola Moto G Pro (Chrome 83.0.4103.106) | |
| WebXPRT 3 - --- | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite (Chrome 80) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (19 - 194, n=297) | |
| Motorola Moto G8 Power (Chrome 80) | |
| Motorola Moto G Pro (Chrome 83.0.4103.106) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (38 - 58, n=9) | |
| LG Q Stylus (Chrome 69) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite (Chrome 80) | |
| Motorola Moto G Pro (Chrome 83.0.4103.106) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (6133 - 9671, n=9) | |
| Motorola Moto G8 Power (Chrome 80) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (894 - 58632, n=829) | |
| LG Q Stylus (hrome 69) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score | |
| LG Q Stylus (hrome 69) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (460 - 59466, n=855) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (4434 - 6719, n=9) | |
| Motorola Moto G8 Power (Chrome 80) | |
| Motorola Moto G Pro (Chrome 83.0.4103.106) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite (Chrome 80) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Motorola Moto G Pro | Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T | Motorola Moto G8 Power | Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite | LG Q Stylus | Average 128 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 2% | 0% | 52% | -30% | -8% | -15% | |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 55.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | 52.83 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -5% | 49.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -11% | 59.8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 7% | 63.55 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 14% | 61.8 (26.1 - 73.5, n=30) 11% | 51.6 (1.7 - 87.1, n=564) -8% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 73.4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | 71.63 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -2% | 69.4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -5% | 73.5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 0% | 83.12 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 13% | 75 (29.2 - 85.9, n=30) 2% | 69.5 (8.1 - 96.5, n=564) -5% |
| Random Write 4KB | 89.36 | 91.15 2% | 132.63 48% | 142 59% | 12.07 -86% | 45.2 (8.48 - 151, n=32) -49% | 40.2 (0.14 - 319, n=935) -55% |
| Random Read 4KB | 65.51 | 90.38 38% | 57.7 -12% | 132 101% | 31.45 -52% | 69.1 (20.7 - 112, n=32) 5% | 63.1 (1.59 - 325, n=935) -4% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 233.63 | 173.95 -26% | 181.88 -22% | 190.8 -18% | 121.4 -48% | 192 (90 - 314, n=32) -18% | 139 (2.99 - 1321, n=935) -41% |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 294.07 | 315.75 7% | 300.9 2% | 776.7 164% | 241.7 -18% | 291 (107 - 501, n=32) -1% | 363 (12.1 - 2037, n=935) 23% |
; PUBG Mobile; 0.19.0: Ø24.8 (16-27)
; Asphalt 9: Legends; 2.3.4a: Ø11.6 (4-25)
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40.4 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.9 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.1 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.7 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.9 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.1 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.7 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Motorola Moto G Pro audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 26% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%
Motorola Moto G8 Power audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 39% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%
Power Consumption
| Off / Standby |   0 / 0.1 Watt |
| Idle |  1.6 / 2.3 / 2.8 Watt |
| Load |
4.2 / 6.9 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Motorola Moto G Pro 4000 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T 4000 mAh | Motorola Moto G8 Power 5000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite 4500 mAh | LG Q Stylus 3300 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 30% | 30% | -9% | 34% | 17% | 22% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 1.6 | 0.62 61% | 0.9 44% | 0.9 44% | 0.69 57% | 1.017 (0.62 - 1.7, n=11) 36% | 0.89 (0.2 - 3.4, n=926) 44% |
| Idle Average * | 2.3 | 1.77 23% | 1.3 43% | 1.6 30% | 1.7 26% | 1.893 (1.3 - 2.3, n=11) 18% | 1.758 (0.6 - 6.2, n=925) 24% |
| Idle Maximum * | 2.8 | 1.8 36% | 1.6 43% | 1.9 32% | 1.73 38% | 2.36 (1.6 - 3.5, n=11) 16% | 2.04 (0.74 - 6.6, n=926) 27% |
| Load Average * | 4.2 | 3.42 19% | 3.2 24% | 8.4 -100% | 3.21 24% | 3.77 (2.61 - 4.7, n=11) 10% | 4.12 (0.8 - 10.8, n=920) 2% |
| Load Maximum * | 6.9 | 6.14 11% | 7.1 -3% | 10.3 -49% | 5.31 23% | 6.66 (5.12 - 7.7, n=11) 3% | 6.13 (1.2 - 14.2, n=920) 11% |
* ... smaller is better
| Motorola Moto G Pro 4000 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T 4000 mAh | Motorola Moto G8 Power 5000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite 4500 mAh | LG Q Stylus 3300 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -4% | 27% | 5% | -39% | |
| Reader / Idle | 2450 | 2205 -10% | 1529 -38% | ||
| H.264 | 882 | 1071 21% | 527 -40% | ||
| WiFi v1.3 | 792 | 764 -4% | 1002 27% | 904 14% | 419 -47% |
| Load | 290 | 274 -6% | 200 -31% |
Pros
+ 集成笔
+ Android One
+ NFC
+ 快速Wi-Fi
+ 不错的相机
+ 明亮的IPS显示屏
+ 杜比扬声器
Cons
- 仅混合双SIM卡插槽
- PWM
- 有限的游戏能力
总结——Moto G Pro是个应该被重视的手机：
一款廉价的带有触控笔的智能手机-借助Moto G Pro，摩托罗拉填补了这一空白，并成为三星Galaxy Note系列的重要竞争对手。
只需330欧元（约合390美元），买家就可以得到配备了手写笔的设备精良的中档智能手机，即使它不能完全媲美三星的手写笔，也非常适合日常使用。
如果您正在寻找带有触控笔的廉价智能手机，那么摩托罗拉Moto G Pro绝对值得考虑。
我们对触控笔的唯一抱怨与手机的名称有关-“ Moto G Pro”丝毫不暗示智能手机的用户会受益于触控笔输入所提供的优势。尽管有趣的是，美国版的Moto G Pro被称为“ Moto G Stylus”，但其在功能方便做得很糟糕：既没有双SIM卡也没有NFC支持，还仅配备10瓦充电器。
回到Moto G Pro：除了触控笔和上述其他优点外，杜比扬声器，明亮的IPS显示屏，优质的摄像头和快速的Wi-Fi等功能进一步增强了用户体验。作为Android One设备，可以保证在未来两年内收到软件更新。
Motorola Moto G Pro - 07/14/2020 v7
Manuel Masiero
Smartphone - Weighted Average