摩托罗拉Moto G Pro智能手机评测：廉价手写笔

Name: Motorola Moto G Pro
Brand: Motorola

摩托罗拉首款手写笔手机。 一款价格实惠的带有手写笔的智能手机-通常，这种组合难得一见。但是，摩托罗拉通过Moto G Pro搅活了市场：以330欧元（约合390美元）的价格，购买者可以获得配备了集成式手写笔和Android One的6.4英寸中端智能手机。

Manuel Masiero, 👁 Florian Schmitt, ✓ Felicitas Krohn (translated by Zewei Shen), 10/02/2020 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android Smartphone Touchscreen

Test device courtesy of Motorola Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Competing Devices

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Drive	Size	Resolution
77 %	10/2020	Motorola Moto G Pro SD 665, Adreno 610	192 g	128 GB eMMC Flash	6.40"	2300x1080
79 %	11/2019	Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T SD 665, Adreno 610	200 g	64 GB eMMC Flash	6.30"	2340x1080
78 %	05/2020	Motorola Moto G8 Power SD 665, Adreno 610	197 g	64 GB eMMC Flash	6.40"	2300x1080
82 %	02/2020	Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18	199 g	128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	6.70"	2400x1080
80 %	07/2018	LG Q Stylus MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2	172 g	32 GB eMMC Flash	6.20"	2160x1080

Size Comparison

Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T LG Q Stylus Motorola Moto G Pro Motorola Moto G8 Power ❌

Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Smartphone (5.59 - 1599, n=301, last 2 years)	439 MBit/s ∼100% +31%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite Mali-G72 MP18, Exynos 9810, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	415 (295^min - 452^max) MBit/s ∼95% +24%
Motorola Moto G Pro Adreno 610, SD 665, 128 GB eMMC Flash	334 (326^min - 340^max) MBit/s ∼76%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T Adreno 610, SD 665, 64 GB eMMC Flash	278 (218^min - 305^max) MBit/s ∼63% -17%
Motorola Moto G8 Power Adreno 610, SD 665, 64 GB eMMC Flash	44.9 (2^min - 75^max) MBit/s ∼10% -87%
LG Q Stylus Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750S, 32 GB eMMC Flash	36 (2^min - 52^max) MBit/s ∼8% -89%
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Smartphone (15.5 - 1414, n=301, last 2 years)	436 MBit/s ∼100% +33%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite Mali-G72 MP18, Exynos 9810, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	370 (342^min - 372^max) MBit/s ∼85% +12%
Motorola Moto G Pro Adreno 610, SD 665, 128 GB eMMC Flash	329 (313^min - 345^max) MBit/s ∼75%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T Adreno 610, SD 665, 64 GB eMMC Flash	315 (157^min - 352^max) MBit/s ∼72% -4%
LG Q Stylus Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750S, 32 GB eMMC Flash	61.5 (43^min - 58^max) MBit/s ∼14% -81%
Motorola Moto G8 Power Adreno 610, SD 665, 64 GB eMMC Flash	56.5 (11^min - 75^max) MBit/s ∼13% -83%

; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø329 (313-345)

; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø334 (326-340)

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Daylight scene 1 Daylight scene 2 Low-light environment

click to load images

Motorola Moto G Pro

Canon EOS 600D

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max

OnePlus 8 Pro

click to load images

Motorola Moto G Pro

Canon EOS 600D

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max

OnePlus 8 Pro

click to load images

Motorola Moto G Pro

Canon EOS 600D

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max

OnePlus 8 Pro

ColorChecker Motorola Moto G Pro: 10.72 ∆E min: 1.62 - max: 17.25 ∆E

<a href="https://www.notebookcheck-cn.com/Moto-G-Pro.496508.0.html">Motorola Moto G Pro</a> — Motorola Moto G Pro


723 cd/m²	720 cd/m²	743 cd/m²
730 cd/m²	735 cd/m²	739 cd/m²
725 cd/m²	732 cd/m²	738 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 743 cd/m² Average: 731.7 cd/m² Minimum: 7.2 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 735 cd/m²
Contrast: 1470:1 (Black: 0.5 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.84 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.5
ΔE Greyscale 5.9 | 0.64-98 Ø5.7
92.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.342

	Motorola Moto G Pro IPS, 2300x1080, 6.40	Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T IPS, 2340x1080, 6.30	Motorola Moto G8 Power IPS, 2300x1080, 6.40	Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.70	LG Q Stylus IPS, 2160x1080, 6.20
Screen		11%	-19%	-16%	-7%
Brightness middle	735	628 -15%	462 -37%	510 -31%	458 -38%
Brightness	732	631 -14%	483 -34%	536 -27%	441 -40%
Brightness Distribution	97	93 -4%	93 -4%	91 -6%	94 -3%
Black Level *	0.5	0.54 -8%	0.65 -30%		0.51 -2%
Contrast	1470	1163 -21%	711 -52%		898 -39%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *	5.84	2 66%	5.7 2%	6.6 -13%	4.5 23%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *	10.2	5.1 50%	8.9 13%	17.56 -72%	7.1 30%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *	5.9	3.7 37%	6.5 -10%	2.9 51%	5.1 14%
Gamma	2.342 ^94%	2.17 ^101%	2.303 ^96%	2.242 ^98%	2.33 ^94%
CCT	7897 ^82%	6230 ^104%	8073 ^81%	6989 ^93%	7381 ^88%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

59.52 Hz

≤ 15 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 59.52 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 15 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 59.52 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 15324 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
20 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 9 ms rise
20 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 11 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 27 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (23.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 19 ms rise
42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 23 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 56 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (37.8 ms).

Geekbench 5.3
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	310 Points ∼53%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	313 Points ∼54% +1%
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	311 Points ∼54% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (309 - 314, n=8)	311 Points ∼54% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (58 - 1604, n=248, last 2 years)	581 Points ∼100% +87%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1358 Points ∼68%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1390 Points ∼70% +2%
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1385 Points ∼70% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (1256 - 1421, n=8)	1356 Points ∼68% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (248 - 4455, n=248, last 2 years)	1991 Points ∼100% +47%
OpenCL Score 5.1 (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	365 Points ∼22%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	368 Points ∼22% +1%
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	368 Points ∼22% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (363 - 368, n=5)	366 Points ∼22% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (351 - 4586, n=51, last 2 years)	1680 Points ∼100% +360%
Vulkan Score 5.1 (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	450 Points ∼29%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	432 Points ∼27% -4%
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	464 Points ∼29% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (432 - 483, n=5)	455 Points ∼29% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (70 - 4043, n=55, last 2 years)	1574 Points ∼100% +250%

PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	8952 Points ∼89%
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	8804 Points ∼88% -2%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	6571 Points ∼66% -27%
LG Q Stylus Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072	4101 Points ∼41% -54%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (7437 - 9051, n=10)	8163 Points ∼82% -9%
Average of class Smartphone (2689 - 19989, n=212, last 2 years)	10004 Points ∼100% +12%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	6962 Points ∼88%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	6587 Points ∼83% -5%
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	6963 Points ∼88% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	5851 Points ∼74% -16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (6189 - 11432, n=12)	6985 Points ∼88% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (82 - 15299, n=259, last 2 years)	7951 Points ∼100% +14%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	24593 Points ∼61%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	23388 Points ∼58% -5%
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	25046 Points ∼62% +2%
LG Q Stylus Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072	9905 Points ∼25% -60%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (22445 - 25046, n=11)	23846 Points ∼59% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (2920 - 117606, n=195, last 2 years)	40234 Points ∼100% +64%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	24804 Points ∼43%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	24871 Points ∼43% 0%
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	25161 Points ∼44% +1%
LG Q Stylus Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072	9864 Points ∼17% -60%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (15403 - 25351, n=11)	24085 Points ∼42% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (2177 - 224130, n=195, last 2 years)	57625 Points ∼100% +132%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	23884 Points ∼97%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	19349 Points ∼78% -19%
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	24652 Points ∼100% +3%
LG Q Stylus Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072	10050 Points ∼41% -58%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (17865 - 24652, n=11)	20749 Points ∼84% -13%
Average of class Smartphone (8324 - 59268, n=195, last 2 years)	23272 Points ∼94% -3%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1734 Points ∼37%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1744 Points ∼37% +1%
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1764 Points ∼37% +2%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	4734 Points ∼100% +173%
LG Q Stylus Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072	123 Points ∼3% -93%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (1675 - 1795, n=12)	1751 Points ∼37% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (68 - 11256, n=257, last 2 years)	3474 Points ∼73% +100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1607 Points ∼29%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1616 Points ∼29% +1%
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1626 Points ∼29% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	5586 Points ∼100% +248%
LG Q Stylus Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072	98 Points ∼2% -94%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (1564 - 1663, n=12)	1623 Points ∼29% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (54 - 16670, n=257, last 2 years)	4073 Points ∼73% +153%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2395 Points ∼78%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2412 Points ∼78% +1%
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2507 Points ∼81% +5%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	3087 Points ∼100% +29%
LG Q Stylus Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072	1172 Points ∼38% -51%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (2282 - 2596, n=12)	2427 Points ∼79% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (607 - 5301, n=257, last 2 years)	2801 Points ∼91% +17%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1782 Points ∼43%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1785 Points ∼43% 0%
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1809 Points ∼43% +2%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	3744 Points ∼90% +110%
LG Q Stylus Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072	565 Points ∼14% -68%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (1754 - 1810, n=12)	1787 Points ∼43% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (149 - 11895, n=278, last 2 years)	4170 Points ∼100% +134%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1668 Points ∼32%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1663 Points ∼32% 0%
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1678 Points ∼32% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	3958 Points ∼75% +137%
LG Q Stylus Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072	495 Points ∼9% -70%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (1650 - 1692, n=12)	1669 Points ∼32% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (122 - 22052, n=278, last 2 years)	5279 Points ∼100% +216%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2344 Points ∼74%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2399 Points ∼76% +2%
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2493 Points ∼79% +6%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	3148 Points ∼100% +34%
LG Q Stylus Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072	1112 Points ∼35% -53%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (2199 - 2503, n=12)	2369 Points ∼75% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (620 - 5784, n=276, last 2 years)	2999 Points ∼95% +28%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1126 Points ∼28%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1076 Points ∼27% -4%
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1137 Points ∼28% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	4022 Points ∼100% +257%
LG Q Stylus Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072	112 Points ∼3% -90%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (1076 - 1152, n=12)	1119 Points ∼28% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (78 - 9138, n=253, last 2 years)	2669 Points ∼66% +137%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	978 Points ∼22%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	927 Points ∼21% -5%
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	984 Points ∼22% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	4422 Points ∼100% +352%
LG Q Stylus Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072	89 Points ∼2% -91%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (927 - 999, n=12)	970 Points ∼22% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (62 - 11573, n=253, last 2 years)	2823 Points ∼64% +189%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2399 Points ∼79%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2468 Points ∼81% +3%
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2493 Points ∼82% +4%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	3056 Points ∼100% +27%
LG Q Stylus Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072	1172 Points ∼38% -51%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (2212 - 2580, n=12)	2418 Points ∼79% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (435 - 5318, n=253, last 2 years)	2835 Points ∼93% +18%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1137 Points ∼26%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1139 Points ∼27% 0%
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1151 Points ∼27% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	4291 Points ∼100% +277%
LG Q Stylus Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072	379 Points ∼9% -67%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (1097 - 1151, n=11)	1135 Points ∼26% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (91 - 9839, n=277, last 2 years)	3386 Points ∼79% +198%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	990 Points ∼21%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	990 Points ∼21% 0%
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	988 Points ∼21% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	4806 Points ∼100% +385%
LG Q Stylus Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072	319 Points ∼7% -68%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (980 - 999, n=11)	988 Points ∼21% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (73 - 12914, n=277, last 2 years)	3823 Points ∼80% +286%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2369 Points ∼76%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2410 Points ∼77% +2%
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2488 Points ∼80% +5%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	3120 Points ∼100% +32%
LG Q Stylus Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072	1110 Points ∼36% -53%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (2154 - 2541, n=11)	2377 Points ∼76% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (620 - 5793, n=277, last 2 years)	3045 Points ∼98% +29%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1044 Points ∼29%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1035 Points ∼29% -1%
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1047 Points ∼29% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	3613 Points ∼100% +246%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (1035 - 1140, n=12)	1074 Points ∼30% +3%
Average of class Smartphone (426 - 6977, n=214, last 2 years)	2638 Points ∼73% +153%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	908 Points ∼22%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	897 Points ∼21% -1%
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	904 Points ∼22% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	4201 Points ∼100% +363%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (897 - 995, n=12)	933 Points ∼22% +3%
Average of class Smartphone (349 - 11259, n=214, last 2 years)	2958 Points ∼70% +226%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2185 Points ∼70%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2232 Points ∼72% +2%
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2354 Points ∼75% +8%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	3120 Points ∼100% +43%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (2185 - 2444, n=12)	2281 Points ∼73% +4%
Average of class Smartphone (1786 - 4061, n=214, last 2 years)	2649 Points ∼85% +21%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	35 fps ∼59%
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	33 fps ∼55% -6%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	58 fps ∼97% +66%
LG Q Stylus Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072	16 fps ∼27% -54%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (30 - 52, n=10)	35.4 fps ∼59% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (8.2 - 143, n=218, last 2 years)	59.6 fps ∼100% +70%
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	36 fps ∼33%
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	36 fps ∼33% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	80 fps ∼74% +122%
LG Q Stylus Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072	17 fps ∼16% -53%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (35 - 37, n=10)	35.9 fps ∼33% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (4.3 - 319, n=218, last 2 years)	108 fps ∼100% +200%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	20 fps ∼35%
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	18 fps ∼32% -10%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	57 fps ∼100% +185%
LG Q Stylus Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072	6.7 fps ∼12% -66%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (15 - 34, n=10)	20.7 fps ∼36% +4%
Average of class Smartphone (4.5 - 120, n=216, last 2 years)	47.1 fps ∼83% +136%
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	19 fps ∼26%
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	19 fps ∼26% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	73 fps ∼100% +284%
LG Q Stylus Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072	7.1 fps ∼10% -63%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (19 - 20, n=10)	19.2 fps ∼26% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (1 - 180, n=217, last 2 years)	63.5 fps ∼87% +234%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	14 fps ∼30%
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	12 fps ∼26% -14%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	46 fps ∼100% +229%
LG Q Stylus Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072	4.5 fps ∼10% -68%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (10 - 27, n=10)	14.6 fps ∼32% +4%
Average of class Smartphone (3.1 - 106, n=215, last 2 years)	36.7 fps ∼80% +162%
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	13 fps ∼30%
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	13 fps ∼30% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	24 fps ∼55% +85%
LG Q Stylus Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072	4.7 fps ∼11% -64%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (13 - 13, n=10)	13 fps ∼30% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1.4 - 121, n=215, last 2 years)	43.6 fps ∼100% +235%

GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	7.7 fps ∼31%
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	6.6 fps ∼26% -14%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	25 fps ∼100% +225%
LG Q Stylus Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072	2.4 fps ∼10% -69%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (5.7 - 13, n=10)	7.69 fps ∼31% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2.8 - 61, n=214, last 2 years)	22.8 fps ∼91% +196%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	7.1 fps ∼24%
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	7.1 fps ∼24% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	29 fps ∼100% +308%
LG Q Stylus Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072	2.5 fps ∼9% -65%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (6.9 - 7.2, n=10)	7.07 fps ∼24% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1.8 - 75, n=214, last 2 years)	26.2 fps ∼90% +269%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	8.6 fps ∼31%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	7.4 fps ∼26% -14%
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	7.6 fps ∼27% -12%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	28 fps ∼100% +226%
LG Q Stylus Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072	2 fps ∼7% -77%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (6.2 - 15, n=12)	9.14 fps ∼33% +6%
Average of class Smartphone (1.5 - 73, n=283, last 2 years)	23.1 fps ∼83% +169%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	8.1 fps ∼26%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	8.1 fps ∼26% 0%
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	8.1 fps ∼26% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	31 fps ∼100% +283%
LG Q Stylus Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072	2.3 fps ∼7% -72%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (7.8 - 8.4, n=12)	8.13 fps ∼26% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (0.95 - 257, n=282, last 2 years)	26.6 fps ∼86% +228%
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	5.1 fps ∼30%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	4.4 fps ∼26% -14%
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	4.5 fps ∼26% -12%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	17 fps ∼100% +233%
LG Q Stylus Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072	1.3 fps ∼8% -75%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (3.9 - 9.1, n=12)	5.53 fps ∼33% +8%
Average of class Smartphone (1.2 - 60, n=283, last 2 years)	15.2 fps ∼89% +198%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2.8 fps ∼25%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2.8 fps ∼25% 0%
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2.8 fps ∼25% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	11 fps ∼100% +293%
LG Q Stylus Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072	0.86 fps ∼8% -69%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (2.7 - 2.8, n=12)	2.78 fps ∼25% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (0.35 - 101, n=283, last 2 years)	10.4 fps ∼95% +271%

AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	173930 Points ∼52%
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	168901 Points ∼50% -3%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	329860 Points ∼98% +90%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (167305 - 181432, n=9)	171951 Points ∼51% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (53335 - 727247, n=195, last 2 years)	337174 Points ∼100% +94%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2315 Points ∼62%
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2238 Points ∼60% -3%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	3393 Points ∼91% +47%
LG Q Stylus Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072	882 Points ∼24% -62%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (2001 - 2556, n=9)	2271 Points ∼61% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (323 - 7123, n=204, last 2 years)	3730 Points ∼100% +61%
System (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	4666 Points ∼69%
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	4848 Points ∼71% +4%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	5707 Points ∼84% +22%
LG Q Stylus Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072	1868 Points ∼27% -60%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (4391 - 5089, n=9)	4825 Points ∼71% +3%
Average of class Smartphone (1160 - 11774, n=204, last 2 years)	6806 Points ∼100% +46%
Memory (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2765 Points ∼63%
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2864 Points ∼65% +4%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	2771 Points ∼63% 0%
LG Q Stylus Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072	778 Points ∼18% -72%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (1804 - 3174, n=9)	2681 Points ∼61% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (522 - 9044, n=204, last 2 years)	4385 Points ∼100% +59%
Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1907 Points ∼30%
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1931 Points ∼30% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	6444 Points ∼100% +238%
LG Q Stylus Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072	633 Points ∼10% -67%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (1881 - 1932, n=9)	1906 Points ∼30% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (349 - 15739, n=204, last 2 years)	5828 Points ∼90% +206%
Web (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1168 Points ∼90%
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	935 Points ∼72% -20%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	1300 Points ∼100% +11%
LG Q Stylus Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072	657 Points ∼51% -44%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (926 - 1400, n=9)	1101 Points ∼85% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 2169, n=204, last 2 years)	1282 Points ∼99% +10%

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (12.4 - 161, n=186, last 2 years)	50.2 Points ∼100% +61%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite (Chrome 80)	32.259 Points ∼64% +3%
Motorola Moto G Pro (Chrome 83.0.4103.106)	31.216 Points ∼62%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (22.9 - 31.2, n=6)	29.2 Points ∼58% -6%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 375, n=198, last 2 years)	90.3 Points ∼100% +85%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite (Chrome 80)	62.949 Points ∼70% +29%
Motorola Moto G Pro (Chrome 83.0.4103.106)	48.855 Points ∼54%
Motorola Moto G8 Power (Chrome 80)	48.109 Points ∼53% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (33.4 - 51, n=8)	47.5 Points ∼53% -3%
LG Q Stylus (hrome 69)	19.174 Points ∼21% -61%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (9 - 196, n=171, last 2 years)	49 runs/min ∼100% +71%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite (Chome 80)	39 runs/min ∼80% +36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (25.4 - 30.8, n=6)	28.9 runs/min ∼59% +1%
Motorola Moto G Pro (Chrome 83.0.4103.106)	28.73 runs/min ∼59%

WebXPRT 3 - ---
Average of class Smartphone (20 - 194, n=205, last 2 years)	78.2 Points ∼100% +42%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite (Chrome 80)	72 Points ∼92% +31%
Motorola Moto G8 Power (Chrome 80)	56 Points ∼72% +2%
Motorola Moto G Pro (Chrome 83.0.4103.106)	55 Points ∼70%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (38 - 58, n=9)	50.9 Points ∼65% -7%
LG Q Stylus (Chrome 69)	25 Points ∼32% -55%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (1986 - 58632, n=213, last 2 years)	17842 Points ∼100% +95%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite (Chrome 80)	12933 Points ∼72% +41%
Motorola Moto G Pro (Chrome 83.0.4103.106)	9153 Points ∼51%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (6133 - 9671, n=9)	8901 Points ∼50% -3%
Motorola Moto G8 Power (Chrome 80)	8675 Points ∼49% -5%
LG Q Stylus (hrome 69)	3474 Points ∼19% -62%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
LG Q Stylus (hrome 69)	13202.5 ms * ∼100% -198%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (4434 - 6719, n=9)	4783 ms * ∼36% -8%
Motorola Moto G8 Power (Chrome 80)	4663.6 ms * ∼35% -5%
Motorola Moto G Pro (Chrome 83.0.4103.106)	4433.6 ms * ∼34%
Average of class Smartphone (460 - 29635, n=215, last 2 years)	3894 ms * ∼29% +12%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite (Chrome 80)	3188.8 ms * ∼24% +28%

* ... smaller is better

	Motorola Moto G Pro	Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T	Motorola Moto G8 Power	Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite	LG Q Stylus	Average 128 GB eMMC Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		2%	0%	52%	-30%	-6%	64%
Sequential Read 256KB	294.07	315.75 7%	300.9 2%	776.7 164%	241.7 -18%	289 (107 - 501, n=38) -2%	787 (41.9 - 2037, n=291, last 2 years) 168%
Sequential Write 256KB	233.63	173.95 -26%	181.88 -22%	190.8 -18%	121.4 -48%	190 (90 - 314, n=38) -19%	350 (11.9 - 1321, n=291, last 2 years) 50%
Random Read 4KB	65.51	90.38 38%	57.7 -12%	132 101%	31.45 -52%	77.7 (20.7 - 247, n=38) 19%	140 (13.5 - 325, n=291, last 2 years) 114%
Random Write 4KB	89.36	91.15 2%	132.63 48%	142 59%	12.07 -86%	45.5 (8.48 - 151, n=38) -49%	126 (5.2 - 330, n=291, last 2 years) 41%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard	73.4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	71.63 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -2%	69.4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -5%	73.5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 0%	83.12 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 13%	78 (29.2 - 154, n=33) 6%	76.2 (13.4 - 154, n=164, last 2 years) 4%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard	55.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	52.83 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -5%	49.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -11%	59.8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 7%	63.55 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 14%	62.5 (26.1 - 81.9, n=33) 12%	58.5 (8.4 - 83.3, n=164, last 2 years) 5%

; PUBG Mobile; 0.19.0: Ø24.8 (16-27)

; Asphalt 9: Legends; 2.3.4a: Ø11.6 (4-25)

Max. Load

Idle


43.7 °C	39.9 °C	38.2 °C
43.9 °C	39.6 °C	38.4 °C
42.1 °C	39 °C	38.4 °C

Maximum: 43.9 °C
Average: 40.4 °C


37.6 °C	39.7 °C	44.1 °C
36.8 °C	39.7 °C	42.6 °C
35.9 °C	38.9 °C	41.3 °C

Maximum: 44.1 °C
Average: 39.6 °C

Power Supply (max.) 40.9 °C | Room Temperature 21.7 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40.4 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.9 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22.4 to 52.9 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.1 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.7 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Motorola Moto G Pro audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 28% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Motorola Moto G8 Power audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 14% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 77% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 41% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0 / 0.1 Watt
Idle	1.6 / 2.3 / 2.8 Watt
Load	4.2 / 6.9 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Motorola Moto G Pro 4000 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T 4000 mAh	Motorola Moto G8 Power 5000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite 4500 mAh	LG Q Stylus 3300 mAh	Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		30%	30%	-9%	34%	17%	15%
Idle Minimum *	1.6	0.62 61%	0.9 44%	0.9 44%	0.69 57%	1.017 (0.62 - 1.7, n=11) 36%	0.954 (0.37 - 2.5, n=233, last 2 years) 40%
Idle Average *	2.3	1.77 23%	1.3 43%	1.6 30%	1.7 26%	1.893 (1.3 - 2.3, n=11) 18%	1.813 (0.65 - 3.94, n=233, last 2 years) 21%
Idle Maximum *	2.8	1.8 36%	1.6 43%	1.9 32%	1.73 38%	2.36 (1.6 - 3.5, n=11) 16%	2.06 (0.69 - 4.2, n=233, last 2 years) 26%
Load Average *	4.2	3.42 19%	3.2 24%	8.4 -100%	3.21 24%	3.77 (2.61 - 4.7, n=11) 10%	4.44 (2.1 - 8.4, n=233, last 2 years) -6%
Load Maximum *	6.9	6.14 11%	7.1 -3%	10.3 -49%	5.31 23%	6.66 (5.12 - 7.7, n=11) 3%	7.29 (3.68 - 12.3, n=233, last 2 years) -6%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		40h 50min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3		13h 12min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		14h 42min
Load (maximum brightness)		4h 50min

	Motorola Moto G Pro 4000 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T 4000 mAh	Motorola Moto G8 Power 5000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite 4500 mAh	LG Q Stylus 3300 mAh
Battery Runtime		-4%	27%	5%	-39%
Reader / Idle	2450			2205 -10%	1529 -38%
H.264	882			1071 21%	527 -40%
WiFi v1.3	792	764 -4%	1002 27%	904 14%	419 -47%
Load	290			274 -6%	200 -31%

Pros

+ 集成笔

+ Android One

+ NFC

+ 快速Wi-Fi

+ 不错的相机

+ 明亮的IPS显示屏

+ 杜比扬声器

Cons

- 仅混合双SIM卡插槽

- PWM

- 有限的游戏能力

总结——Moto G Pro是个应该被重视的手机：

In review: Motorol Moto G Pro. Test device courtesy of Motorola Germany

一款廉价的带有触控笔的智能手机-借助Moto G Pro，摩托罗拉填补了这一空白，并成为三星Galaxy Note系列的重要竞争对手。

只需330欧元（约合390美元），买家就可以得到配备了手写笔的设备精良的中档智能手机，即使它不能完全媲美三星的手写笔，也非常适合日常使用。

如果您正在寻找带有触控笔的廉价智能手机，那么摩托罗拉Moto G Pro绝对值得考虑。

我们对触控笔的唯一抱怨与手机的名称有关-“ Moto G Pro”丝毫不暗示智能手机的用户会受益于触控笔输入所提供的优势。尽管有趣的是，美国版的Moto G Pro被称为“ Moto G Stylus”，但其在功能方便做得很糟糕：既没有双SIM卡也没有NFC支持，还仅配备10瓦充电器。

回到Moto G Pro：除了触控笔和上述其他优点外，杜比扬声器，明亮的IPS显示屏，优质的摄像头和快速的Wi-Fi等功能进一步增强了用户体验。作为Android One设备，可以保证在未来两年内收到软件更新。

Motorola Moto G Pro - 2020-07-14 07/14/2020 v7
Manuel Masiero

Chassis

82%

Keyboard

60 / 75 → 81%

Pointing Device

87%

Connectivity

43 / 70 → 61%

Weight

89%

Battery

90%

Display

82%

Games Performance

13 / 64 → 20%

Application Performance

59 / 86 → 68%

Temperature

87%

Noise

100%

Audio

77 / 90 → 86%

Camera

63%

Average

72%

77%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

Linked Articles

Motorola Moto G Pro (Moto G Series)

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Marius Schell - Tech Writer and translator - 274 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2020

contact me via: LinkedIn

Translator: Ninh Duy - Editorial Assistant - 196077 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2017

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!