Notebookcheck Logo

摩托罗拉Moto G Pro智能手机评测：廉价手写笔

摩托罗拉首款手写笔手机。 一款价格实惠的带有手写笔的智能手机-通常，这种组合难得一见。 但是，摩托罗拉通过Moto G Pro搅活了市场：以330欧元（约合390美元）的价格，购买者可以获得配备了集成式手写笔和Android One的6.4英寸中端智能手机。
Android Smartphone Touchscreen
good (77%) Motorola Moto G Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 665Qualcomm Adreno 610 Smartphone - 07/14/2020 - v7
Test device courtesy of Motorola Deutschland
Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG
Motorola Moto G Pro (Moto G Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 8 x 2.2 GHz, Kryo 260
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 610
Memory
4 GB 
Display
6.40 inch 19.2:9, 2300 x 1080 pixel 399 PPI, capacitive, IPS, FHD+, glossy: yes
Storage
128 GB eMMC Flash, 128 GB 
, 109.2 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5毫米耳机插孔, Card Reader: 最大512 GB的microSD, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 加速计，陀螺仪，接近传感器，环境光传感器，传感器集线器，指纹传感器, Wi-Fi Direct
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM (band 2, 3, 5, 8), UMTS (band 1, 2, 4, 5, 8), LTE (band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71), head SAR 1.52 W/kg, body SAR 1.58 W/kg, Dual SIM, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 9.2 x 158.6 x 75.8
Battery
4000 mAh Lithium-Ion
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 10
Camera
Primary Camera: 48 MPix 48 MP（f / 1.7，1.6 µm）+ 16 MP广角镜头（f / 2.2，2.0 µm）+ 2-MP微距镜头（f / 2.2），激光自动对焦，视频分辨率高达UHD @ 30FPS
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix f / 2.0，1 µm，视频，最高全高清@ 30FPS
Additional features
Speakers: 杜比立体声扬声器, Keyboard: 虚拟, 触控笔，模块化18瓦充电器，USB电缆（Type-C至Type-A），SIM卡工具，快速入门指南，保修信息, Android One, 24 Months Warranty, fanless
Weight
192 g, Power Supply: 35 g
Links
Motorola homepage
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Competing Devices

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
77.2 %
10/2020
Motorola Moto G Pro
SD 665, Adreno 610		192 g128 GB eMMC Flash6.40"2300x1080
79.3 %
11/2019
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
SD 665, Adreno 610		200 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.30"2340x1080
78.1 %
05/2020
Motorola Moto G8 Power
SD 665, Adreno 610		197 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.40"2300x1080
82.8 %
02/2020
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18		199 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.70"2400x1080
80.3 %
07/2018
LG Q Stylus
MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2		172 g32 GB eMMC Flash6.20"2160x1080

Size Comparison

❌
163.7 mm 76.1 mm 8.7 mm 199 g161.15 mm 75.4 mm 8.6 mm 200 g160.2 mm 77.8 mm 8.4 mm 172 g158.6 mm 75.8 mm 9.2 mm 192 g156 mm 76 mm 10 mm 197 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Mali-G72 MP18, Exynos 9810, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
415 (295min - 452max) MBit/s +24%
Motorola Moto G Pro
Adreno 610, SD 665, 128 GB eMMC Flash
334 (326min - 340max) MBit/s
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Adreno 610, SD 665, 64 GB eMMC Flash
278 (218min - 305max) MBit/s -17%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Adreno 610, SD 665, 64 GB eMMC Flash
44.9 (2min - 75max) MBit/s -87%
LG Q Stylus
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750S, 32 GB eMMC Flash
36 (2min - 52max) MBit/s -89%
iperf3 receive AX12
Average of class Smartphone
  (last 2 years)
376 MBit/s +14%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Mali-G72 MP18, Exynos 9810, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
370 (342min - 372max) MBit/s +12%
Motorola Moto G Pro
Adreno 610, SD 665, 128 GB eMMC Flash
329 (313min - 345max) MBit/s
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Adreno 610, SD 665, 64 GB eMMC Flash
315 (157min - 352max) MBit/s -4%
LG Q Stylus
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750S, 32 GB eMMC Flash
61.5 (43min - 58max) MBit/s -81%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Adreno 610, SD 665, 64 GB eMMC Flash
56.5 (11min - 75max) MBit/s -83%
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340Tooltip
Motorola Moto G Pro; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø329 (313-345)
Motorola Moto G Pro; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø334 (326-340)
Motorola Moto G Pro: Overview
Motorola Moto G Pro: Overview
Motorola Moto G Pro: Turn
Motorola Moto G Pro: Turn
Motorola Moto G Pro: Bridge
Motorola Moto G Pro: Bridge
Garmin Edge 520: Overview
Garmin Edge 520: Overview
Garmin Edge 520: Turn
Garmin Edge 520: Turn
Garmin Edge 520: Bridge
Garmin Edge 520: Bridge

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Daylight scene 1Daylight scene 2Low-light environment
ColorChecker
16.4 ∆E
12.6 ∆E
17.2 ∆E
15.9 ∆E
15.6 ∆E
11.5 ∆E
15.5 ∆E
14.5 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
9 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
14.8 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
10.9 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
1.6 ∆E
ColorChecker Motorola Moto G Pro: 10.72 ∆E min: 1.62 - max: 17.25 ∆E
ColorChecker
25.2 ∆E
41 ∆E
30.8 ∆E
30.6 ∆E
32.6 ∆E
42.7 ∆E
40.3 ∆E
25.5 ∆E
27.8 ∆E
22.7 ∆E
46.3 ∆E
49.3 ∆E
23 ∆E
36.8 ∆E
23.5 ∆E
49.6 ∆E
29.6 ∆E
33.1 ∆E
41.2 ∆E
44.6 ∆E
41.8 ∆E
33.2 ∆E
23 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
ColorChecker Motorola Moto G Pro: 33.64 ∆E min: 13.2 - max: 49.61 ∆E
723
cd/m²		720
cd/m²		743
cd/m²
730
cd/m²		735
cd/m²		739
cd/m²
725
cd/m²		732
cd/m²		738
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 743 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 731.7 cd/m² Minimum: 7.2 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 735 cd/m²
Contrast: 1470:1 (Black: 0.5 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.84 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 5.9 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
92.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.342
Motorola Moto G Pro
IPS, 2300x1080, 6.40		Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
IPS, 2340x1080, 6.30		Motorola Moto G8 Power
IPS, 2300x1080, 6.40		Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.70		LG Q Stylus
IPS, 2160x1080, 6.20
Screen
11%
-19%
-16%
-7%
Brightness middle
735
628
-15%
462
-37%
510
-31%
458
-38%
Brightness
732
631
-14%
483
-34%
536
-27%
441
-40%
Brightness Distribution
97
93
-4%
93
-4%
91
-6%
94
-3%
Black Level *
0.5
0.54
-8%
0.65
-30%
0.51
-2%
Contrast
1470
1163
-21%
711
-52%
898
-39%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
5.84
2
66%
5.7
2%
6.6
-13%
4.5
23%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
10.2
5.1
50%
8.9
13%
17.56
-72%
7.1
30%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
5.9
3.7
37%
6.5
-10%
2.9
51%
5.1
14%
Gamma
2.342 94%
2.17 101%
2.303 96%
2.242 98%
2.33 94%
CCT
7897 82%
6230 104%
8073 81%
6989 93%
7381 88%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 59.5 Hz ≤ 15 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 59.5 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 15 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 59.5 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
20 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 9 ms rise
↘ 11 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 37 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 19 ms rise
↘ 23 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 63 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).
Geekbench 5.5 | PCMark for Android | 3DMark | GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | GFXBench 3.0 | GFXBench 3.1 | GFXBench | AnTuTu v8 | BaseMark OS II
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
310 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
313 Points +1%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
311 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (309 - 314, n=8)
311 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (119 - 2138, n=219, last 2 years)
913 Points +195%
Multi-Core (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1358 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1390 Points +2%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1385 Points +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1256 - 1421, n=8)
1356 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 6681, n=219, last 2 years)
2996 Points +121%
OpenCL Score 5.1 (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
365 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
368 Points +1%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
368 Points +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (363 - 368, n=5)
366 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (516 - 18876, n=46, last 2 years)
7173 Points +1865%
Vulkan Score 5.1 (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
450 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
432 Points -4%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
464 Points +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (432 - 483, n=5)
455 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (281 - 18656, n=52, last 2 years)
7719 Points +1615%
PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
8952 Points
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
8804 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
6571 Points -27%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
4101 Points -54%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (7437 - 9051, n=10)
8163 Points -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10884 - 19297, n=2, last 2 years)
15091 Points +69%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
6962 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
6587 Points -5%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
6963 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
5851 Points -16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (6189 - 11432, n=12)
6985 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9101 - 12871, n=4, last 2 years)
10872 Points +56%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
24593 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
23388 Points -5%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
25046 Points +2%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
9905 Points -60%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (22445 - 25046, n=11)
23846 Points -3%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
24804 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
24871 Points 0%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
25161 Points +1%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
9864 Points -60%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (15403 - 25351, n=11)
24085 Points -3%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
23884 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
19349 Points -19%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
24652 Points +3%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
10050 Points -58%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (17865 - 24652, n=11)
20749 Points -13%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1734 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1744 Points +1%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1764 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
4734 Points +173%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
123 Points -93%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1675 - 1795, n=12)
1751 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (712 - 7285, n=50, last 2 years)
3766 Points +117%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1607 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1616 Points +1%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1626 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
5586 Points +248%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
98 Points -94%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1564 - 1663, n=12)
1623 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (618 - 9451, n=50, last 2 years)
4186 Points +160%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2395 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2412 Points +1%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2507 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
3087 Points +29%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
1172 Points -51%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (2282 - 2596, n=12)
2427 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1093 - 4525, n=50, last 2 years)
3082 Points +29%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1782 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1785 Points 0%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1809 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
3744 Points +110%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
565 Points -68%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1754 - 1810, n=12)
1787 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (704 - 23024, n=114, last 2 years)
9351 Points +425%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1668 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1663 Points 0%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1678 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
3958 Points +137%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
495 Points -70%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1650 - 1692, n=12)
1669 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (607 - 45492, n=113, last 2 years)
16352 Points +880%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2344 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2399 Points +2%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2493 Points +6%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
3148 Points +34%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
1112 Points -53%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (2199 - 2503, n=12)
2369 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1075 - 8749, n=113, last 2 years)
4426 Points +89%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1126 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1076 Points -4%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1137 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
4022 Points +257%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
112 Points -90%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1076 - 1152, n=12)
1119 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (286 - 7890, n=105, last 2 years)
2755 Points +145%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
978 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
927 Points -5%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
984 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
4422 Points +352%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
89 Points -91%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (927 - 999, n=12)
970 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (240 - 9814, n=105, last 2 years)
2751 Points +181%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2399 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2468 Points +3%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2493 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
3056 Points +27%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
1172 Points -51%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (2212 - 2580, n=12)
2418 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (858 - 4679, n=105, last 2 years)
3163 Points +32%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1137 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1139 Points 0%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1151 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
4291 Points +277%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
379 Points -67%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1097 - 1151, n=11)
1135 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (317 - 20131, n=182, last 2 years)
6737 Points +493%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
990 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
990 Points 0%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
988 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
4806 Points +385%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
319 Points -68%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (980 - 999, n=11)
988 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (267 - 33376, n=181, last 2 years)
9723 Points +882%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2369 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2410 Points +2%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2488 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
3120 Points +32%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
1110 Points -53%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (2154 - 2541, n=11)
2377 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (938 - 8480, n=181, last 2 years)
4224 Points +78%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1044 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1035 Points -1%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1047 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
3613 Points +246%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1035 - 1140, n=12)
1074 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (365 - 6439, n=99, last 2 years)
2671 Points +156%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
908 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
897 Points -1%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
904 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
4201 Points +363%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (897 - 995, n=12)
933 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (298 - 8601, n=99, last 2 years)
2850 Points +214%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2185 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2232 Points +2%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2354 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
3120 Points +43%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (2185 - 2444, n=12)
2281 Points +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1667 - 3525, n=99, last 2 years)
2675 Points +22%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
35 fps
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
33 fps -6%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
58 fps +66%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
16 fps -54%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (30 - 52, n=10)
35.4 fps +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (22 - 165, n=183, last 2 years)
84.6 fps +142%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
36 fps
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
36 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
80 fps +122%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
17 fps -53%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (35 - 37, n=10)
35.9 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (19 - 791, n=183, last 2 years)
247 fps +586%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
20 fps
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
18 fps -10%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
57 fps +185%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
6.7 fps -66%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (15 - 34, n=10)
20.7 fps +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6.8 - 165, n=185, last 2 years)
72.2 fps +261%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
19 fps
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
19 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
73 fps +284%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
7.1 fps -63%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (19 - 20, n=10)
19.2 fps +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.2 - 363, n=185, last 2 years)
140.6 fps +640%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
14 fps
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
12 fps -14%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
46 fps +229%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
4.5 fps -68%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (10 - 27, n=10)
14.6 fps +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.7 - 158, n=185, last 2 years)
60.9 fps +335%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
13 fps
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
13 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
24 fps +85%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
4.7 fps -64%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (13 - 13, n=10)
13 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6.2 - 279, n=185, last 2 years)
99 fps +662%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
7.7 fps
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
6.6 fps -14%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
25 fps +225%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
2.4 fps -69%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (5.7 - 13, n=10)
7.69 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5 - 117, n=185, last 2 years)
43.4 fps +464%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
7.1 fps
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
7.1 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
29 fps +308%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
2.5 fps -65%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (6.9 - 7.2, n=10)
7.07 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.9 - 166, n=185, last 2 years)
59.9 fps +744%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
8.6 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
7.4 fps -14%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
7.6 fps -12%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
28 fps +226%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
2 fps -77%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (6.2 - 15, n=12)
9.14 fps +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.6 - 123, n=226, last 2 years)
44 fps +412%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
8.1 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
8.1 fps 0%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
8.1 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
31 fps +283%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
2.3 fps -72%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (7.8 - 8.4, n=12)
8.13 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.3 - 229, n=226, last 2 years)
64.3 fps +694%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
5.1 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
4.4 fps -14%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
4.5 fps -12%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
17 fps +233%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
1.3 fps -75%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (3.9 - 9.1, n=12)
5.53 fps +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.8 - 119, n=226, last 2 years)
32.8 fps +543%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2.8 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2.8 fps 0%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2.8 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
11 fps +293%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
0.86 fps -69%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (2.7 - 2.8, n=12)
2.78 fps -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 94, n=226, last 2 years)
25.6 fps +814%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
173930 Points
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
168901 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
329860 Points +90%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (167305 - 181432, n=9)
171951 Points -1%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2315 Points
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2238 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
3393 Points +47%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
882 Points -62%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (2001 - 2556, n=9)
2271 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (411 - 11438, n=166, last 2 years)
5759 Points +149%
System (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
4666 Points
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
4848 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
5707 Points +22%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
1868 Points -60%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (4391 - 5089, n=9)
4825 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2376 - 16475, n=166, last 2 years)
9672 Points +107%
Memory (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2765 Points
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2864 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
2771 Points 0%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
778 Points -72%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1804 - 3174, n=9)
2681 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (670 - 12716, n=166, last 2 years)
6267 Points +127%
Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1907 Points
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1931 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
6444 Points +238%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
633 Points -67%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1881 - 1932, n=9)
1906 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (697 - 58651, n=166, last 2 years)
14220 Points +646%
Web (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1168 Points
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
935 Points -20%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
1300 Points +11%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
657 Points -44%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (926 - 1400, n=9)
1101 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10 - 2145, n=166, last 2 years)
1495 Points +28%
Jetstream 2 | JetStream 1.1 | Speedometer 2.0 | WebXPRT 3 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 351, n=173, last 2 years)
106.1 Points +240%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite (Chrome 80)
32.26 Points +3%
Motorola Moto G Pro (Chrome 83.0.4103.106)
31.22 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (22.9 - 31.2, n=6)
29.2 Points -6%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (last 2 years)
104.3 Points +114%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite (Chrome 80)
62.9 Points +29%
Motorola Moto G Pro (Chrome 83.0.4103.106)
48.85 Points
Motorola Moto G8 Power (Chrome 80)
48.11 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (33.4 - 51, n=8)
47.5 Points -3%
LG Q Stylus (hrome 69)
19.17 Points -61%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (14.9 - 445, n=157, last 2 years)
107.1 runs/min +273%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite (Chome 80)
39 runs/min +36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (25.4 - 30.8, n=6)
28.9 runs/min +1%
Motorola Moto G Pro (Chrome 83.0.4103.106)
28.73 runs/min
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (39 - 304, n=122, last 2 years)
133.1 Points +142%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite (Chrome 80)
72 Points +31%
Motorola Moto G8 Power (Chrome 80)
56 Points +2%
Motorola Moto G Pro (Chrome 83.0.4103.106)
55 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (38 - 58, n=9)
50.9 Points -7%
LG Q Stylus (Chrome 69)
25 Points -55%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (4633 - 89112, n=213, last 2 years)
33503 Points +266%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite (Chrome 80)
12933 Points +41%
Motorola Moto G Pro (Chrome 83.0.4103.106)
9153 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (6133 - 9671, n=9)
8901 Points -3%
Motorola Moto G8 Power (Chrome 80)
8675 Points -5%
LG Q Stylus (hrome 69)
3474 Points -62%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
LG Q Stylus (hrome 69)
13203 ms * -198%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (4434 - 6719, n=9)
4783 ms * -8%
Motorola Moto G8 Power (Chrome 80)
4664 ms * -5%
Motorola Moto G Pro (Chrome 83.0.4103.106)
4434 ms *
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite (Chrome 80)
3189 ms * +28%
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=173, last 2 years)
1595 ms * +64%

* ... smaller is better

Motorola Moto G ProXiaomi Redmi Note 8TMotorola Moto G8 PowerSamsung Galaxy Note10 LiteLG Q StylusAverage 128 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
2%
0%
52%
-30%
-3%
318%
Sequential Read 256KB
294.1
315.8
7%
300.9
2%
777
164%
241.7
-18%
283 ?(106.7 - 511, n=74)
-4%
1508 ?(226 - 4512, n=218, last 2 years)
413%
Sequential Write 256KB
233.6
173.9
-26%
181.9
-22%
190.8
-18%
121.4
-48%
193 ?(72.3 - 314, n=74)
-17%
1118 ?(57.5 - 3678, n=218, last 2 years)
379%
Random Read 4KB
65.5
90.4
38%
57.7
-12%
132
102%
31.45
-52%
82.4 ?(8.63 - 247, n=74)
26%
247 ?(22.2 - 543, n=218, last 2 years)
277%
Random Write 4KB
89.4
91.2
2%
132.6
48%
142
59%
12.07
-86%
54 ?(3.84 - 159.9, n=74)
-40%
272 ?(13 - 709, n=218, last 2 years)
204%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
73.4 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
71.6 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-2%
69.4 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-5%
73.5 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
83.1 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
13%
78.1 ?(29.2 - 153.8, n=34)
6%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
55.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
52.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-6%
49.7 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-11%
59.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
7%
63.5 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
14%
61.8 ?(26.1 - 81.9, n=34)
11%
0510152025Tooltip
Motorola Moto G Pro; PUBG Mobile; 0.19.0: Ø24.8 (16-27)
Motorola Moto G Pro; Asphalt 9: Legends; 2.3.4a: Ø11.6 (4-25)
Max. Load
 43.7 °C39.9 °C38.2 °C 
 43.9 °C39.6 °C38.4 °C 
 42.1 °C39 °C38.4 °C 
Maximum: 43.9 °C
Average: 40.4 °C
37.6 °C39.7 °C44.1 °C
36.8 °C39.7 °C42.6 °C
35.9 °C38.9 °C41.3 °C
Maximum: 44.1 °C
Average: 39.6 °C
Power Supply (max.)  40.9 °C | Room Temperature 21.7 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40.4 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.9 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.1 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.7 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.836.62539.940.13131.933.44038.936.65043.739.26329.830.38025.926.810026.326.512524.933.116021.644.82001950.725018.954.431518.155.440016.659.650016.265.563014.969.78001570.6100015.671.2125014.973.6160014.972.8200015.669.8250014.667.3315014.270.5400014.170.7500014.469.6630014.667.2800014.962.41000015.265.21250015.461.91600015.760.9SPL59.568.76666.36470.627.581.9N12.922.418.319.715.825.3152.5median 15.4median 65.5median 42.2median 43median 39.9median 48median 14.2median 67.2Delta3.19.623.923.324.122.613.314.745.247.543.745.234.836.937.640.739.542.136.636.329.130.128.429.130.533.924.742.322.851.621.955.421.559.319.962.120.767.719.271.118.772.42275.518.274.317.873.317.770.217.87217.67617.877.417.772.218.167.518.359.218.767.91972.619.46466.13185.1191.662.4median 19median 67.7median 73.83.412.211.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMotorola Moto G ProMotorola Moto G8 Power
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Motorola Moto G Pro audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 67.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 67.2% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 67.2% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (118.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 86% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 5% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 96% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Motorola Moto G8 Power audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 73.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 73.8% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 73.8% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (125.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 95% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 98% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 0% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0 / 0.1 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.6 / 2.3 / 2.8 Watt
Load midlight 4.2 / 6.9 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Motorola Moto G Pro
4000 mAh		Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
4000 mAh		Motorola Moto G8 Power
5000 mAh		Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
4500 mAh		LG Q Stylus
3300 mAh		Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
 		Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
30%
30%
-9%
34%
17%
14%
Idle Minimum *
1.6
0.62
61%
0.9
44%
0.9
44%
0.69
57%
1.017 ?(0.62 - 1.7, n=11)
36%
0.897 ?(0.42 - 2.37, n=162, last 2 years)
44%
Idle Average *
2.3
1.77
23%
1.3
43%
1.6
30%
1.7
26%
1.893 ?(1.3 - 2.3, n=11)
18%
1.452 ?(0.69 - 4.26, n=162, last 2 years)
37%
Idle Maximum *
2.8
1.8
36%
1.6
43%
1.9
32%
1.73
38%
2.36 ?(1.6 - 3.5, n=11)
16%
1.629 ?(0.79 - 4.45, n=162, last 2 years)
42%
Load Average *
4.2
3.42
19%
3.2
24%
8.4
-100%
3.21
24%
3.77 ?(2.61 - 4.7, n=11)
10%
5.55 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=162, last 2 years)
-32%
Load Maximum *
6.9
6.14
11%
7.1
-3%
10.3
-49%
5.31
23%
6.66 ?(5.12 - 7.7, n=11)
3%
8.31 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=162, last 2 years)
-20%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
40h 50min
WiFi Websurfing
13h 12min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
14h 42min
Load (maximum brightness)
4h 50min
Motorola Moto G Pro
4000 mAh		Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
4000 mAh		Motorola Moto G8 Power
5000 mAh		Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
4500 mAh		LG Q Stylus
3300 mAh
Battery Runtime
-4%
27%
5%
-39%
Reader / Idle
2450
2205
-10%
1529
-38%
H.264
882
1071
21%
527
-40%
WiFi v1.3
792
764
-4%
1002
27%
904
14%
419
-47%
Load
290
274
-6%
200
-31%

Pros

+ 集成笔
+ Android One
+ NFC
+ 快速Wi-Fi
+ 不错的相机
+ 明亮的IPS显示屏
+ 杜比扬声器

Cons

- 仅混合双SIM卡插槽
- PWM
- 有限的游戏能力

总结——Moto G Pro是个应该被重视的手机：

In review: Motorol Moto G Pro. Test device courtesy of Motorola Germany
In review: Motorol Moto G Pro. Test device courtesy of Motorola Germany

一款廉价的带有触控笔的智能手机-借助Moto G Pro，摩托罗拉填补了这一空白，并成为三星Galaxy Note系列的重要竞争对手。

只需330欧元（约合390美元），买家就可以得到配备了手写笔的设备精良的中档智能手机，即使它不能完全媲美三星的手写笔，也非常适合日常使用。

如果您正在寻找带有触控笔的廉价智能手机，那么摩托罗拉Moto G Pro绝对值得考虑。

我们对触控笔的唯一抱怨与手机的名称有关-“ Moto G Pro”丝毫不暗示智能手机的用户会受益于触控笔输入所提供的优势。尽管有趣的是，美国版的Moto G Pro被称为“ Moto G Stylus”，但其在功能方便做得很糟糕：既没有双SIM卡也没有NFC支持，还仅配备10瓦充电器。

回到Moto G Pro：除了触控笔和上述其他优点外，杜比扬声器，明亮的IPS显示屏，优质的摄像头和快速的Wi-Fi等功能进一步增强了用户体验。作为Android One设备，可以保证在未来两年内收到软件更新。

Motorola Moto G Pro - 07/14/2020 v7
Manuel Masiero

Chassis
82%
Keyboard
60 / 75 → 81%
Pointing Device
87%
Connectivity
43 / 70 → 61%
Weight
89%
Battery
90%
Display
82%
Games Performance
13 / 64 → 20%
Application Performance
59 / 86 → 68%
Temperature
87%
Noise
100%
Audio
77 / 90 → 86%
Camera
63%
Average
72%
77%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 摩托罗拉Moto G Pro智能手机评测：廉价手写笔
Manuel Masiero, 2020-10- 2 (Update: 2020-10- 2)