摩托罗拉Moto G73 5G评测--尽管它的显示屏乏善可陈，但还是很精彩？

Name: Motorola Moto G73 5G
Brand: Motorola

日常工作的主力军。 120Hz的屏幕，稳定的性能，长的电池寿命，5000万像素的摄像头和时尚的设计--从纸面上看，摩托罗拉Moto G73 5G拥有一个好的中层智能手机所需要的一切。以略低于300欧元（330美元）的价格，你还可以得到一个几乎是库存的Android 13和大量的存储。然而，正如你在我们的评论中所看到的，这个6.5英寸的设备并不总是比它的前辈做得更好。

Manuel Masiero, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 05/07/2023 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

5G Android Smartphone Touchscreen

摩托罗拉已经通过Moto G73 5G和其较小的兄弟姐妹更新了其中层智能手机产品。摩托G53.Moto G53的价格约为250欧元（276美元），Moto G73 5G的价格约为300欧元（330美元）。不过，对许多用户来说，G73可能是这两款产品中更有趣的产品。

就其略高的价格标签而言，同样是6.5英寸的Moto G73 5G比Moto G53有一些优势。摩托G53.除了拥有5G网络支持和更快的SoC，它还拥有两倍的存储空间（256GB），以及分辨率更高的120Hz IPS面板（2400 x 1,080）。

在竞争激烈的中端市场，Moto G73 5G正在加入许多其他类似价格和规格的智能手机的行列。在本评论中，我们将讨论摩托罗拉的最新手机是否有能力从所有这些竞争对手中脱颖而出。

Test device courtesy of Motorola Germany

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Motorola Moto G73 5G (Moto G Series)

Processor

MediaTek Dimensity 930 8 x 2 - 2.2 GHz, Cortex-A78 / A55

Graphics adapter

IMG BXM-8-256

Memory

8 GB

Display

6.50 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 405 PPI, capacitive, IPS LCD, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz

Storage

256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 256 GB

, 239 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: 3.5 mm headset jack, Card Reader: microSD up to 1 TB, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Fingerprint reader, Proximity, Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Ambient Light, SAR sensor, Sensor Hub, E-Compass, DRM Widevine L1, Camera2 API Level 3,

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.3, 2G (Band 2/3/5/8), 3G (Band 1/2/5/8/19), 4G (Band 1/2/3/5/7/8/18/19/20/26/28/32/38/40/41/42), 5G (Band n1/n3/n5/n7/n8/n20/n28/n38/n40/n41/n77/n78), Head SAR 1.01 W/kg, Body SAR 1.78 W/kg, Dual SIM, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 8.29 x 161.42 x 73.84

Battery

5000 mAh, 30W charging power (max. 10V/3.0A)

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 13

Camera

Primary Camera: 50 MPix Dual camera: 50MP main camera (f/1.8, 1.0 µm/2.0 µm Ultra-Pixel, PDAF) 8MP ultrawide camera (118°, f/2.2, 1.12 µm, AF), videos up to FullHD@60fps
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix f/2.4, 1.0 µm/2.0 µm Ultra-Pixel

Additional features

Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: virtual, Protective cover, 30W charger, USB-C cable, quick start guide, SIM tool, 24 Months Warranty, fanless

Weight

181 g, Power Supply: 75 g

Price

400 Euro

Links

Motorola homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Drive	Size	Resolution
82.8 %	05/2023	Motorola Moto G73 5G Dimensity 930, IMG BXM-8-256	181 g	256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	6.50"	2400x1080
85.8 %	09/2022	Google Pixel 6a Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20	178 g	128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.10"	2400x1080
81.9 %	12/2022	Motorola Moto G72 Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2	166 g	128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	6.60"	2400x1080
85.6 %	07/2022	Nothing Phone (1) SD 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L	193.5 g	256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.55"	2400x1080
84.9 %	04/2023	Samsung Galaxy A34 5G Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4	199 g	128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	6.60"	2340x1080
85.4 %	04/2023	Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4	187 g	128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	6.67"	2400x1080

外壳 - 塑料底盘，但有高级设计

摩托罗拉Moto G73 5G有两种颜色：午夜蓝 （黑蓝色）和琉璃白 （白色的暖色调）。在后者，机身框架和后置摄像头模块周围的边框都是银色。但摩托罗拉已经决定不在这款6.5英寸的手机上使用任何高级材料：底盘完全由塑料制成。

在181克（0.4磅）的重量下，Moto G73 5G缺乏其前辈的轻盈品质(摩托G72)，它的体重只有166克（0.37磅）。但这款8.2毫米厚的手机（0.32英寸）做工同样出色，手感也很好。据摩托罗拉称，该机的底盘只有在受压时才会出现非常小的弯曲，而且是防水的，但该手机并没有达到IP等级。

除了外形略有不同外，几乎不可能区分Moto G73 5G和Moto G72。摩托G72从正面看，几乎无法将它们区分开来。然而，摩托罗拉为G73的背面采用了新的设计语言。之前的方形摄像头模块已经让位给了一个长方形的模块，里面只有两个（5000万像素+800万像素）而不是三个摄像头。对于Moto G73 5G，摩托罗拉已经放弃了前代产品上的200万像素微距镜头。

尺寸比较

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G Motorola Moto G73 5G Samsung Galaxy A34 5G Motorola Moto G72 Nothing Phone (1) Google Pixel 6a DIN A6 ❌

规格 - 8GB的内存和256GB的存储空间

无论你选择哪种颜色，Moto G73 5G总是配备8GB的内存和256GB的UFS 2.2存储。你可以通过添加一张高达1TB的microSD卡来扩展存储量。G73 5G有一个混合插槽，可以容纳第二张nano SIM卡。这意味着，如果你不打算添加更多存储空间，你可以插入两张nano SIM卡。

与许多中档手机不同，摩托罗拉G73 5G配备了一个3.5毫米音频插孔。然而，它的USB-C端口是相当标准的，只能达到USB 2.0的速度。除了NFC和蓝牙5.3，这款手机还支持DRM Widewine L1，因此可以以高清质量串流内容。

微型SD卡读卡器

Moto G73 5G与我们参考的microSD卡（Angelbird AV Pro V60）一起，设法提供良好和稳定的读取和写入速度。内置读卡器在我们的文件复制测试中也表现良好。尽管如此，它仍然无法达到Moto G72的速度。摩托G72.

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	44.01 MB/s +50%
Motorola Moto G72 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird V60)	34.2 MB/s +17%
Motorola Moto G73 5G IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird V60)	29.3 MB/s

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

Motorola Moto G73 5G IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø35.7 (26.1-47)

Motorola Moto G72 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB: Ø37.8 (26.7-49.3)

Motorola Moto G73 5G IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø76.4 (50.9-84.3)

Motorola Moto G72 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB: Ø70.6 (29.3-82.6)

软件--近似于股票Android 13

摩托G73 5G运行的主要是股票Android 13，并辅以摩托罗拉自己的摩托应用。除其他事项外，该应用程序让用户可以修改用户界面设计，配置手势控制，并启用我们在其他摩托罗拉手机上看到的Peek Display功能。

根据该产品的支持页面摩托罗拉承诺在2026年1月之前为该手机提供一次操作系统更新以及Android 安全更新。后者的更新应该是每两个月推出一次。然而，在这次审查时（4月下旬），该公司仍然落后于他们的更新时间表：最后一个安全补丁的日期是2022年12月1日。

连接性和GNSS - 良好的Wi-Fi 5和精确的GPS

Moto G73 5G支持目前所有的蜂窝网络标准，包括5G（Sub-6），并为其价位提供良好的频率覆盖，具有16个4G频段和12个5G频段的兼容性。当然，这不会让摩托罗拉手机变成一个环球旅行者，但它应该足以确保你在欧洲中部总是能收到信号。

当Moto G73 5G连接到我们的参考路由器（华硕ROG Rapture AXE11000）时，通过Wi-Fi提供了良好和稳定的传输速率。其结果与Wi-Fi 5所能达到的效果完全一致。也就是说，现在市场上的许多中档智能手机的速度要快得多。例如，谷歌Pixel 6a和小米Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G可以通过Wi-Fi传输数据的速度是G73的两倍以上。

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Google Pixel 6a Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	897 (449^min - 907^max) MBit/s +152%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	825 (790^min - 837^max) MBit/s +132%
Average of class Smartphone (34.8 - 1875, n=209, last 2 years)	655 MBit/s +84%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	634 (610^min - 642^max) MBit/s +78%
Motorola Moto G73 5G IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	356 (333^min - 362^max) MBit/s
Motorola Moto G72 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	333 (307^min - 348^max) MBit/s -6%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	977 (487^min - 997^max) MBit/s +162%
Google Pixel 6a Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	946 (459^min - 973^max) MBit/s +154%
Average of class Smartphone (40.5 - 1810, n=210, last 2 years)	692 MBit/s +86%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	679 (653^min - 709^max) MBit/s +82%
Motorola Moto G73 5G IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	373 (355^min - 386^max) MBit/s
Motorola Moto G72 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	359 (338^min - 372^max) MBit/s -4%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Average of class Smartphone (229 - 1894, n=61, last 2 years)	1536 MBit/s
Nothing Phone (1) Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	946 (926^min - 951^max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Average of class Smartphone (598 - 1840, n=61, last 2 years)	1364 MBit/s
Nothing Phone (1) Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	598 (517^min - 731^max) MBit/s

Motorola Moto G73 5G MediaTek Dimensity 930, IMG BXM-8-256; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø355 (333-362)

Motorola Moto G72 Mediatek Helio G99, ARM Mali-G57 MP2; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø332 (307-348)

Motorola Moto G73 5G MediaTek Dimensity 930, IMG BXM-8-256; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø373 (355-386)

Motorola Moto G72 Mediatek Helio G99, ARM Mali-G57 MP2; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø360 (338-372)

摩托罗拉G73 5G使用卫星导航服务GPS（L1）、GLONASS（L1）和Galileo（L1）。这款手机能够在户外快速确定其位置，精确度达到一米。

为了测试它在现实世界中的导航能力，我们带着Moto G73 5G骑了大约4公里长的自行车（2.49英里），并将它记录的路线与Garmin Venu 2健身手表提供的路线进行比较。虽然手机并不总是准确地追踪我们在所走路线上的位置，但与实际路径的偏差总体上是可以忽略不计的。因此，摩托罗拉非常适用于日常的导航任务。

电话和通话质量

Moto G73 5G在打电话时声音很好。即使在嘈杂的环境中，另一端的人的声音也很清晰，几乎没有噪音。在免提模式下，对话听起来有些模糊，但仍然保持高度可理解性。

卡槽可以容纳两张nano SIM卡或一张nano SIM卡和一张microSD卡。该手机支持VoLTE和Wi-Fi通话。

该设备的辐射水平为1.01 W/kg（头部SAR）和1.78 W/kg（身体SAR），比Moto G72的辐射水平略高。摩托G72(分别为0.95和1.69 W/kg)。对于那些寻找辐射特别低的手机的人来说，小米Redmi Note 12(0.367 W/kg和0.789 W/kg)是我们比较的设备中的最佳选择。

摄像头 - 双摄像头设置

Moto G73 5G有一个1600万像素的前置摄像头，能产生相当清晰的图像，并能在人像模式下自动模糊背景。在背面，有一个双摄像头设置，包括一个5000万像素的主摄像头和一个800万像素的118°超宽摄像头。

默认情况下，主摄像头将四个相邻的像素合并为一个像素，从而产生1200万像素的图像。Ultra-Res模式让你可以利用完整的5000万像素分辨率。

正如预期的那样，主摄像头不能跟上高端相机设备，但它能很好地完成它需要做的事情。在白天，该相机可以拍摄出具有良好对比度和体面的细节水平的清晰照片。即使在低光照条件下，主摄像头仍然能够从一个场景中获得很多东西，特别是在夜视模式下--对于这个价格范围内的手机上的摄像头来说，这是一个令人印象深刻的壮举。

800万像素的超宽摄像头同样在白天也能拍出好看的照片。然而，你很快就会发现，在放大图像时，图像缺乏细节。Moto G73使用混合变焦在两个镜头之间自动切换。

自拍相机可以拍摄高达1080p和30fps的视频。就像主摄像头一样，可以做到1080p，60帧，前置摄像头使用电子图像稳定技术。双重拍摄 功能允许你同时使用自拍相机和主摄像头或超宽摄像头录制视频。尽管在这种模式下，你不能在它们之间切换录制。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Daylight photo 1 Daylight photo 2 Ultrawide shot Low-light photo

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

在我们的测试实验室里，这台主拍机证明了它能在最佳照明条件下准确地再现色彩（最大Delta E为8.77）。它的低光性能也值得竖起大拇指；尽管非常模糊，但在1勒克斯下拍摄的测试图表的照片仍然完全可读。

ColorChecker Motorola Moto G73 5G: 6.74 ∆E min: 3.54 - max: 8.77 ∆E

附件和保修 - 可选保护计划

摩托罗拉Moto G73 5G包装内有一个30瓦的充电器（10V/3A），一条USB线（Type-C到C），一个SIM卡弹出工具，一个透明保护壳，一份快速入门指南和一份单独的安全信息手册。在摩托罗拉商店，你还可以购买耳机和蓝牙音箱等配件。

摩托罗拉在德国为Moto G73 5G提供24个月的保修。保修条件可能因地区而异。例如，美国的客户只能得到12个月的标准保修。该公司还让用户选择将保修期延长至三年，并通过Moto Care购买一个额外的事故保护计划。.在撰写本报告时，这将花费20至44欧元（约22至48美元），取决于所选择的计划。

输入设备和处理 - 电源按钮中集成指纹传感器

液晶面板支持高达120Hz的刷新率，使输入、动画和菜单及网站的滚动看起来漂亮而流畅。机身右侧的硬件按钮在按下时提供清晰的反馈。

用户可以使用二维人脸识别或电源按钮中内置的指纹识别器对Moto G73 5G进行生物识别解锁。这两种方法都很快速和可靠。然而，在使用基于软件的人脸识别时，你需要确保环境光线足够明亮。否则你将无法登录。

显示屏--与前代产品相比有明显的退步

摩托罗拉Moto G73 5G放弃了前代产品的OLED显示屏，而采用了IPS屏幕。尽管它保留了120Hz的刷新率，但该面板在亮度方面又退了一步。

虽然摩托G72的平均峰值亮度为980cd/m²，因此在这个部门高于中档设备的平均水平，但Moto G73 5G的最大亮度几乎减半。在纯白色背景下，整个屏幕的平均亮度只有498cd/m²，这使G73 5G在我们的比较中处于最底层。将分析限制在屏幕的一个较小部分（APL18）也没有使结果好多少，结果是最大亮度为542 cd/m²。

尽管如此，改用LCD面板确实有一个好处：摩托罗拉Moto G73 5G不会出现任何PWM闪烁，这意味着敏感的用户可以放心地使用该设备。


523 cd/m²	492 cd/m²	486 cd/m²
511 cd/m²	516 cd/m²	483 cd/m²
508 cd/m²	494 cd/m²	468 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 523 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 497.9 cd/m² Minimum: 2.94 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 89 %
Center on Battery: 516 cd/m²
Contrast: 1200:1 (Black: 0.43 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.08 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 2.4 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
99.2% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.283

	Motorola Moto G73 5G IPS LCD, 2400x1080, 6.50	Google Pixel 6a AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.10	Motorola Moto G72 P-OLED, 2400x1080, 6.60	Nothing Phone (1) OLED, 2400x1080, 6.55	Samsung Galaxy A34 5G Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.60	Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G OLED, 2400x1080, 6.67
Screen		42%	2%	31%	30%	61%
Brightness middle	516	758 47%	992 92%	620 20%	922 79%	938 82%
Brightness	498	767 54%	980 97%	625 26%	930 87%	939 89%
Brightness Distribution	89	93 4%	92 3%	98 10%	98 10%	96 8%
Black Level *	0.43
Contrast	1200
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	2.08	0.9 57%	4.56 -119%	1.24 40%	2.5 -20%	0.9 57%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	5.94	2.5 58%	7.96 -34%	2.31 61%	3.6 39%	1.6 73%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.4	1.6 33%	3.1 -29%	1.7 29%	2.7 -13%	1 58%
Gamma	2.283 ^96%	2.2 ^100%	2.233 ^99%	2.318 ^95%	2.09 ^105%	2.25 ^98%
CCT	7006 ^93%	6599 ^98%	7098 ^92%	6325 ^103%	6661 ^98%	6350 ^102%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17909 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Moto G73 5G的IPS屏幕同时支持HDR10和HLG。该显示屏在自然模式下具有最佳的色彩还原性。颜色和灰色阴影的Delta E值都在理想范围内（即低于3）。当涉及到RGB平衡时，LCD面板并不十分完美，但非常小的蓝色色调（色温7006K）在日常使用中应该很难察觉。还有一个滑块，可以让你根据自己的喜好调整色温。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
31.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 11.6 ms rise
31.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 20.3 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 84 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
33.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 16.9 ms rise
33.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 16.8 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 40 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

由于其IPS显示屏的亮度相对较低，Moto G73在户外使用时并不完全令人惊讶。在阳光直射下，屏幕上的内容有时会很难看。即使在阴暗的地方，可读性也不总是完美的。虽然从尖锐的角度看时，显示屏只表现出最小的色差，但当你不以90°正面看液晶屏时，其亮度会迅速下降。

性能 - 扎实的中段动力

摩托罗拉Moto G73 5G采用八核联发科Dimensity 930SoC，它取代了联发科Helio G99在G72中发现。该 Dimensity 930采用6纳米工艺制造，包括两个运行在2.2GHz的ARM Cortext A78性能核心，以及六个高效的ARM Cortex A55核心，可以达到2GHz。

芯片联发科Dimensity 930帮助Moto G73 5G在日常使用中提供出色的性能。这款智能手机在我们的CPU基准测试中的运行速度不亚于三星Galaxy A34 5G和小米Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G但除了PCMark之外，它在这两款设备中都处于落后状态。虽然Moto G73 5G的性能超过了Moto G72 5G，但它在PCMark中却落后于这两款设备。摩托G72但它们之间的差距并不是很大。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Google Pixel 6a Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144	1025 Points +47%
Average of class Smartphone (119 - 2138, n=217, last 2 years)	918 Points +32%
Nothing Phone (1) Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192	824 Points +18%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144	782 Points +12%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192	765 Points +10%
Motorola Moto G73 5G MediaTek Dimensity 930, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192	698 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 930 (641 - 698, n=2)	670 Points -4%
Motorola Moto G72 Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144	540 Points -23%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone (473 - 6681, n=217, last 2 years)	3009 Points +58%
Nothing Phone (1) Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192	2998 Points +57%
Google Pixel 6a Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144	2940 Points +54%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144	2315 Points +21%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192	2035 Points +7%
Motorola Moto G73 5G MediaTek Dimensity 930, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192	1909 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 930 (1787 - 1909, n=2)	1848 Points -3%
Motorola Moto G72 Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144	1810 Points -5%

Geekbench 6.0
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone (188 - 2531, n=44, last 2 years)	1279 Points +40%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144	1029 Points +12%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192	968 Points +6%
Motorola Moto G73 5G MediaTek Dimensity 930, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192	916 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 930 (832 - 916, n=2)	874 Points -5%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone (512 - 6460, n=44, last 2 years)	3412 Points +48%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144	2497 Points +8%
Motorola Moto G73 5G MediaTek Dimensity 930, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192	2306 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192	2201 Points -5%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 930 (1998 - 2306, n=2)	2152 Points -7%

Antutu v9 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (102602 - 1650926, n=153, last 2 years)	738503 Points +71%
Google Pixel 6a Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144	715338 Points +66%
Nothing Phone (1) Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192	582264 Points +35%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144	472321 Points +10%
Motorola Moto G73 5G MediaTek Dimensity 930, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192	430895 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 930 (394141 - 430895, n=2)	412518 Points -4%
Motorola Moto G72 Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144	334060 Points -22%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192	Points -100%

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average of class Smartphone (4761 - 21385, n=213, last 2 years)	11798 Points 0%
Motorola Moto G73 5G MediaTek Dimensity 930, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192	11787 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 930 ()	11787 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192	11763 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144	11721 Points -1%
Nothing Phone (1) Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192	11662 Points -1%
Motorola Moto G72 Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144	10589 Points -10%
Google Pixel 6a Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144	9717 Points -18%

CrossMark - Overall
Google Pixel 6a Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144	865 Points +41%
Average of class Smartphone (200 - 1474, n=165, last 2 years)	837 Points +37%
Nothing Phone (1) Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192	760 Points +24%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192	665 Points +9%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144	657 Points +7%
Motorola Moto G73 5G MediaTek Dimensity 930, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192	612 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 930 (606 - 612, n=2)	609 Points 0%
Motorola Moto G72 Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144	602 Points -2%

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Google Pixel 6a Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144	5950 Points +58%
Average of class Smartphone (411 - 11438, n=165, last 2 years)	5745 Points +52%
Nothing Phone (1) Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192	4768 Points +26%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192	4189 Points +11%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144	3850 Points +2%
Motorola Moto G73 5G MediaTek Dimensity 930, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192	3771 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 930 (3527 - 3771, n=2)	3649 Points -3%
Motorola Moto G72 Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144	3054 Points -19%
System
Nothing Phone (1) Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192	10424 Points +49%
Average of class Smartphone (2376 - 16475, n=165, last 2 years)	9678 Points +39%
Google Pixel 6a Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144	9109 Points +31%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144	7182 Points +3%
Motorola Moto G73 5G MediaTek Dimensity 930, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192	6979 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 930 (6635 - 6979, n=2)	6807 Points -2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192	6684 Points -4%
Motorola Moto G72 Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144	6484 Points -7%
Memory
Google Pixel 6a Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144	6592 Points +33%
Average of class Smartphone (670 - 12716, n=165, last 2 years)	6250 Points +26%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192	5938 Points +20%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144	5267 Points +6%
Motorola Moto G73 5G MediaTek Dimensity 930, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192	4955 Points
Nothing Phone (1) Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192	4763 Points -4%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 930 (4352 - 4955, n=2)	4654 Points -6%
Motorola Moto G72 Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144	3982 Points -20%
Graphics
Google Pixel 6a Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144	14148 Points +253%
Average of class Smartphone (697 - 58651, n=165, last 2 years)	14101 Points +252%
Nothing Phone (1) Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192	8175 Points +104%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192	5093 Points +27%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144	4666 Points +16%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 930 (4011 - 4298, n=2)	4155 Points +4%
Motorola Moto G73 5G MediaTek Dimensity 930, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192	4011 Points
Motorola Moto G72 Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144	2730 Points -32%
Web
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192	1521 Points +4%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 2145, n=165, last 2 years)	1494 Points +3%
Google Pixel 6a Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144	1476 Points +1%
Motorola Moto G73 5G MediaTek Dimensity 930, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192	1457 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 930 (1276 - 1457, n=2)	1367 Points -6%
Nothing Phone (1) Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192	1273 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144	1244 Points -15%
Motorola Moto G72 Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144	1234 Points -15%

UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144	22490 Points +308%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192	21997 Points +299%
Average of class Smartphone (207 - 84787, n=150, last 2 years)	21814 Points +296%
Google Pixel 6a Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144	21639 Points +293%
Nothing Phone (1) Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192	20784 Points +277%
Motorola Moto G72 Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144	9695 Points +76%
Motorola Moto G73 5G MediaTek Dimensity 930, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192	5507 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 930 (5039 - 5507, n=2)	5273 Points -4%

AImark - Score v3.x
Average of class Smartphone (298 - 245629, n=105, last 2 years)	17833 Points +1933%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144	9429 Points +975%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192	8784 Points +902%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 930 (877 - 953, n=2)	915 Points +4%
Motorola Moto G72 Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144	907 Points +3%
Motorola Moto G73 5G MediaTek Dimensity 930, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192	877 Points

联发科的迪米特里930配备了一个 IMG BXM-8-256集成GPU，它基于PowerVR B系列架构。这种GPU仍然是相当新和奇特的，因此不是每个应用程序都能识别。例如，3DMark Wild Life拒绝在Moto G73 5G上运行，因为据称该显卡不兼容。

GPU测试的结果与合成基准测试相似：摩托罗拉Moto G73 5G的速度略高于摩托G72但不能完全跟上三星Galaxy A34 5G和小米Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G在性能方面。

3DMark: 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3086 Points +3%
Motorola Moto G73 5G IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2999 Points
Nothing Phone (1) Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2854 Points -5%
Motorola Moto G72 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2837 Points -5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2763 Points -8%
Google Pixel 6a Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Points -100%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics
Nothing Phone (1) Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	5412 Points +85%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	4359 Points +49%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	4198 Points +43%
Motorola Moto G73 5G IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2932 Points
Motorola Moto G72 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2393 Points -18%
Google Pixel 6a Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Points -100%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited
Nothing Phone (1) Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4513 Points +53%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3993 Points +35%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3784 Points +28%
Motorola Moto G73 5G IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2947 Points
Motorola Moto G72 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2479 Points -16%
Google Pixel 6a Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Points -100%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Nothing Phone (1) Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4518 Points +31%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	4411 Points +28%
Google Pixel 6a Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4277 Points +24%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	4047 Points +17%
Motorola Moto G72 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3622 Points +5%
Motorola Moto G73 5G IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3452 Points

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Google Pixel 6a Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	8957 Points +271%
Nothing Phone (1) Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	5759 Points +138%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	4406 Points +82%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	4387 Points +82%
Motorola Moto G72 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2459 Points +2%
Motorola Moto G73 5G IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2416 Points

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Google Pixel 6a Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	7205 Points +178%
Nothing Phone (1) Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	5428 Points +110%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	4362 Points +68%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	4321 Points +67%
Motorola Moto G72 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2648 Points +2%
Motorola Moto G73 5G IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2589 Points

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Nothing Phone (1) Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	113 fps +61%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	89 fps +27%
Motorola Moto G73 5G IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	70 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	64 fps -9%
Google Pixel 6a Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps -14%
Motorola Moto G72 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	54 fps -23%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Google Pixel 6a Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	252 fps +241%
Nothing Phone (1) Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	141 fps +91%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	106 fps +43%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	106 fps +43%
Motorola Moto G73 5G IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	74 fps
Motorola Moto G72 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	64 fps -14%

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Nothing Phone (1) Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	74 fps +32%
Google Pixel 6a Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps +7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	58 fps +4%
Motorola Moto G73 5G IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	56 fps
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	54 fps -4%
Motorola Moto G72 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	36 fps -36%

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Google Pixel 6a Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	151 fps +140%
Nothing Phone (1) Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	82 fps +30%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	69 fps +10%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	68 fps +8%
Motorola Moto G73 5G IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	63 fps
Motorola Moto G72 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	40 fps -37%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Google Pixel 6a Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps +88%
Nothing Phone (1) Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	58 fps +81%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	40 fps +25%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	39 fps +22%
Motorola Moto G73 5G IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	32 fps
Motorola Moto G72 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	22 fps -31%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Google Pixel 6a Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	100 fps +300%
Nothing Phone (1) Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	64 fps +156%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	46 fps +84%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	43 fps +72%
Motorola Moto G72 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	25 fps 0%
Motorola Moto G73 5G IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	25 fps

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Google Pixel 6a Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	54 fps +200%
Nothing Phone (1) Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	33 fps +83%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	23 fps +28%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	22 fps +22%
Motorola Moto G73 5G IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	18 fps
Motorola Moto G72 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	12 fps -33%

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Google Pixel 6a Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	52 fps +174%
Nothing Phone (1) Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	37 fps +95%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	27 fps +42%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	26 fps +37%
Motorola Moto G73 5G IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	19 fps
Motorola Moto G72 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	15 fps -21%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Google Pixel 6a Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	39 fps +255%
Nothing Phone (1) Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	22 fps +100%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	17 fps +55%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	14 fps +27%
Motorola Moto G73 5G IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	11 fps
Motorola Moto G72 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	8.9 fps -19%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Google Pixel 6a Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	28 fps +294%
Nothing Phone (1) Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	15 fps +111%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	12 fps +69%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	11 fps +55%
Motorola Moto G73 5G IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	7.1 fps
Motorola Moto G72 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	5.9 fps -17%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Google Pixel 6a Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	43 fps +126%
Nothing Phone (1) Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	36 fps +89%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	27 fps +42%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	26 fps +37%
Motorola Moto G73 5G IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	19 fps
Motorola Moto G72 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	14 fps -26%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Google Pixel 6a Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	58 fps +176%
Nothing Phone (1) Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	40 fps +90%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	29 fps +38%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	29 fps +38%
Motorola Moto G73 5G IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	21 fps
Motorola Moto G72 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	16 fps -24%

GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Google Pixel 6a Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	14 fps +367%
Nothing Phone (1) Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.7 fps +123%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	4.7 fps +57%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	4.7 fps +57%
Motorola Moto G73 5G IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3 fps
Motorola Moto G72 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2.5 fps -17%

Moto G73 5G能够快速加载和渲染网站。在浏览器基准测试中，摩托罗拉手机甚至能够在我们的对比组中取得高于平均水平的排名，这很可能主要是由于该设备有一个较新的浏览器版本。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 351, n=173, last 2 years)	106.1 Points +38%
Motorola Moto G73 5G (Chrome 111.0.5563.116)	77.058 Points
Google Pixel 6a (Firefox 1ß4-2-ß)	75.261 Points -2%
Nothing Phone (1) (Chrome 103)	73.679 Points -4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G (Chrome 111)	71.873 Points -7%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 930 (64.7 - 77.1, n=2)	70.9 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G (Chrome 111.0.5563.116)	69.688 Points -10%
Motorola Moto G72 (Chrome 107)	59.8 Points -22%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (14.9 - 445, n=157, last 2 years)	107.1 runs/min +83%
Google Pixel 6a (Chrome 105.0.5195.79)	90.4 runs/min +55%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G (Chrome 111)	62.9 runs/min +8%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G (Chrome 111.0.5563.116)	62.2 runs/min +6%
Motorola Moto G73 5G (Chrome 111.0.5563.116)	58.44 runs/min
Nothing Phone (1) (Chome 103)	53.71 runs/min -8%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 930 (44.1 - 58.4, n=2)	51.3 runs/min -12%
Motorola Moto G72 (Chome 107)	40.69 runs/min -30%

WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 202, n=160, last 2 years)	100.2 Points +17%
Motorola Moto G73 5G (Chrome 111.0.5563.116)	86 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 930 (69 - 86, n=2)	77.5 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G (Chrome 111.0.5563.116)	74 Points -14%
Google Pixel 6a (Chrome 105.0.5195.79)	72 Points -16%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G (Chrome 111)	71 Points -17%
Nothing Phone (1) (Chrome 103)	69 Points -20%
Motorola Moto G72 (Chrome 107)	58 Points -33%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (39 - 304, n=122, last 2 years)	133.1 Points +21%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G (Chrome 111.0.5563.116)	114 Points +4%
Motorola Moto G73 5G (Chrome 111.0.5563.116)	110 Points
Nothing Phone (1) (Chrome 103)	102 Points -7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G (Chrome 111)	102 Points -7%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 930 (93 - 110, n=2)	101.5 Points -8%
Motorola Moto G72 (Chrome 107)	92 Points -16%
Google Pixel 6a (Chrome 105.0.5195.79)	77 Points -30%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (4633 - 89112, n=211, last 2 years)	33640 Points +26%
Google Pixel 6a (Chrome 105.0.5195.79)	33046 Points +23%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G (Chrome 111)	31662 Points +18%
Motorola Moto G73 5G (Chrome 111.0.5563.116)	26766 Points
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G (Chrome 111.0.5563.116)	25154 Points -6%
Nothing Phone (1) (Chrome 103)	24488 Points -9%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 930 (20342 - 26766, n=2)	23554 Points -12%
Motorola Moto G72 (Chrome 107)	18237 Points -32%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Motorola Moto G72 (Chrome 107)	2227.3 ms * -52%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G (Chrome 111.0.5563.116)	1796.7 ms * -23%
Nothing Phone (1) (Chrome 103)	1796.1 ms * -23%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G (Chrome 111)	1766.4 ms * -20%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 930 (1466 - 1986, n=2)	1726 ms * -18%
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=173, last 2 years)	1595 ms * -9%
Google Pixel 6a (Chrome 105.0.5195.79)	1531.6 ms * -4%
Motorola Moto G73 5G (Chrome 111.0.5563.116)	1465.9 ms *

* ... smaller is better

Moto G73 5G在同类产品中表现出良好的读写性能。在连续的读取操作中，它能够比Moto G72更好地利用其UFS 2.2存储。摩托G72的UFS 2.2存储，后者拥有相同的存储组件。

	Motorola Moto G73 5G	Google Pixel 6a	Motorola Moto G72	Nothing Phone (1)	Samsung Galaxy A34 5G	Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G	Average 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		5%	-11%	36%	-15%	6%	-6%	31%
Sequential Read 256KB	963.54	1312.64 36%	868.5 -10%	1638 70%	887.41 -8%	1008.8 5%	892 ?(482 - 1009, n=22) -7%	1505 ?(226 - 4512, n=215, last 2 years) 56%
Sequential Write 256KB	808.95	712.94 -12%	497.5 -39%	1351.9 67%	494.67 -39%	865.59 7%	690 ?(369 - 913, n=22) -15%	1112 ?(57.5 - 3678, n=215, last 2 years) 37%
Random Read 4KB	231.38	219.53 -5%	231.4 0%	240.6 4%	216.75 -6%	241.83 5%	219 ?(99.7 - 291, n=22) -5%	247 ?(22.2 - 543, n=215, last 2 years) 7%
Random Write 4KB	220.46	225.61 2%	230.2 4%	228.2 4%	206.14 -6%	234.21 6%	230 ?(99.2 - 301, n=22) 4%	271 ?(13 - 709, n=215, last 2 years) 23%

游戏--120帧是可以做到的，但仍然是一个例外。

游戏在这款中档的摩托罗拉手机上运行流畅。虽然它并不总是足够好的最大图形设置，但战术射击游戏PUBG Mobile可以在高清/高 设置下达到稳定的30帧 ，这是 手机上可选择的最高选项。

你还可以期待在图形要求不高的游戏中获得更高的帧率。Armajet可以在60帧运行，而Subway Surfers平均在90帧运行。

游戏中的帧率是用GameBench测量的。.

Motorola Moto G73 5G; Armajet; 1.61.6: Ø59.6 (52-62)

Motorola Moto G73 5G; PUBG Mobile; 2.5.0: Ø29.6 (25-31)

Motorola Moto G73 5G; Subway Surfers; 3.11.0: Ø90 (82-91)

排放 - 温度高，但没有节流现象

温度

在使用中，Moto G73没有任何表面温度过高的问题。该设备在负载下的温度可以达到45℃（113℉）。虽然这个温度水平并不重要，但在炎热的夏天，表面肯定会变热几度，使手机拿在手里并不完全舒适。

我们没有注意到Moto G73 5G内部有任何热量积聚。在我们的测试中，这款手机不断能够在长时间的负载下充分挖掘SoC的性能。由于这款手机不兼容3DMark Wild Life，我们在压力测试中使用GFXBench的电池测试作为替代。

Max. Load

Idle


43.9 °C	40.2 °C	37.4 °C
43.2 °C	39 °C	37.3 °C
42.5 °C	39.2 °C	37.5 °C

Maximum: 43.9 °C
Average: 40 °C


37.7 °C	40.2 °C	43.5 °C
37.5 °C	40.3 °C	45.1 °C
36.4 °C	40.7 °C	43.6 °C

Maximum: 45.1 °C
Average: 40.6 °C

Power Supply (max.) 42.3 °C | Room Temperature 20.5 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.9 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.1 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.6 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

发言人

虽然缺乏低音，但就智能手机而言，Moto G73 5G上兼容Dolby Atmos的立体声扬声器能产生相当平衡的声音。即使把音量调到最大，它们也不会失真。

你可以通过3.5毫米音频插孔或蓝牙5.3连接外部音频设备到手机。除了AAC、SBC、LC3和LDAC，Moto G73 5G还支持目前所有的aptX编解码器，以及LDHC v1至v4。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Motorola Moto G73 5G audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 18% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 39% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Motorola Moto G72 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 33% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 54% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 - 省电且持久

消耗功率

Moto G73 5G在空闲状态下相当省电，但在负载情况下会对电池造成很大压力。也就是说，它的耗电量总体上是适中的，属于该类手机的平均范围。

5,000毫安时的电池可以使用附带的30瓦适配器（最大10V/3A）进行充电。在我们的测试中，将电池从0带到100%需要1小时19分钟。29分钟后，电池充满50%，46分钟后充满75%，50分钟后充满80%。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idle	0.7 / 1.2 / 1.8 Watt
Load	4.8 / 9.7 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Motorola Moto G73 5G 5000 mAh	Google Pixel 6a 4410 mAh	Motorola Moto G72 5000 mAh	Nothing Phone (1) 4500 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A34 5G 5000 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G 5000 mAh	Average MediaTek Dimensity 930	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		-3%	13%	2%	5%	-14%	-1%	-8%
Idle Minimum *	0.7	0.68 3%	0.7 -0%	1 -43%	0.69 1%	0.99 -41%	0.9 ?(0.7 - 1.1, n=2) -29%	0.897 ?(0.42 - 2.37, n=162, last 2 years) -28%
Idle Average *	1.2	1.56 -30%	1.1 8%	1.2 -0%	1.61 -34%	2.03 -69%	1.35 ?(1.2 - 1.5, n=2) -13%	1.452 ?(0.69 - 4.26, n=162, last 2 years) -21%
Idle Maximum *	1.8	1.58 12%	1.5 17%	1.5 17%	1.66 8%	2.08 -16%	1.85 ?(1.8 - 1.9, n=2) -3%	1.629 ?(0.79 - 4.45, n=162, last 2 years) 9%
Load Average *	4.8	5.37 -12%	4.5 6%	4.2 12%	4.01 16%	3.97 17%	4 ?(3.2 - 4.8, n=2) 17%	5.55 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=162, last 2 years) -16%
Load Maximum *	9.7	8.74 10%	6.5 33%	7.4 24%	6.5 33%	5.85 40%	7.45 ?(5.2 - 9.7, n=2) 23%	8.31 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=162, last 2 years) 14%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Motorola Moto G73 5G MediaTek Dimensity 930; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø7.07 (4.78-9.67)

Motorola Moto G72 Mediatek Helio G99; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø3.83 (1.999-6.34)

Samsung Galaxy A34 5G MediaTek Dimensity 1080; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø3.94 (1.008-7.97)

Motorola Moto G73 5G MediaTek Dimensity 930; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.035 (0.687-2.35)

Motorola Moto G72 Mediatek Helio G99; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.84 (0.697-1.325)

Samsung Galaxy A34 5G MediaTek Dimensity 1080; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.147 (1.038-1.308)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

Motorola Moto G73 5G MediaTek Dimensity 930; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø7.46 (6.45-7.74)

Motorola Moto G72 Mediatek Helio G99; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø3.94 (3.12-4.34)

Samsung Galaxy A34 5G MediaTek Dimensity 1080; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø3.12 (2.67-3.43)

Motorola Moto G73 5G MediaTek Dimensity 930; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.035 (0.687-2.35)

Motorola Moto G72 Mediatek Helio G99; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.84 (0.697-1.325)

Samsung Galaxy A34 5G MediaTek Dimensity 1080; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.147 (1.038-1.308)

电池寿命

长时间的电池寿命是Moto G73 5G的最大优势之一。在屏幕亮度设置为150cd/m²的情况下，这款手机在我们的模拟网络冲浪测试中大致持续了17.5个小时，在循环播放H.264视频时几乎持续了20个小时。

在我们比较的设备中，只有三星Galaxy A34 5G在这些测试中成功地超过了Moto G73 5G。尽管同样拥有5000毫安时的电池，但摩托G72并没有完全达到其继任者的电池寿命。

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		57h 38min
WiFi Websurfing		17h 26min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		19h 57min
Load (maximum brightness)		4h 50min

	Motorola Moto G73 5G 5000 mAh	Google Pixel 6a 4410 mAh	Motorola Moto G72 5000 mAh	Nothing Phone (1) 4500 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A34 5G 5000 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G 5000 mAh
Battery Runtime		-10%	-9%	-21%	9%	-18%
Reader / Idle	3458	1878 -46%	2396 -31%	1813 -48%	2975 -14%	1598 -54%
H.264	1197	1318 10%	1104 -8%	1059 -12%	1363 14%	1043 -13%
WiFi v1.3	1046	768 -27%	929 -11%	926 -11%	1024 -2%	978 -7%
Load	290	360 24%	333 15%	259 -11%	395 36%	299 3%

Pros

+ Android 13个无臃肿软件

+ 120Hz显示屏

+ 5G、NFC、蓝牙5.3、精确的GPS

+ 3.5毫米音频插孔

+ 良好的性能

+ 日光下的好相机

+ 带有杜比全景声的立体声扬声器

+ 电池寿命长

Cons

- 缺乏亮度的IPS面板

- 没有IP等级

- 没有状态LED

- 没有4K视频录制能力

对摩托罗拉Moto G73 5G的评判

摩托罗拉Moto G73是一款坚实的中档智能手机，为你提供了巨大的价值。如果你打算把手机主要用于网页浏览、视频播放和偶尔的游戏，你会在这款6.5英寸的设备上得到很多实惠。

Moto G73 5G在日常情况下提供了很多实用性，这要归功于它的长电池寿命、精简的Android 13和5000万像素的双摄像头设置，在白天也能拍出好照片。此外，它具有坚实的频率覆盖，准确的GPS，用于流媒体高清内容的DRM Widewine L1，以及支持HDR10的反应灵敏的120Hz显示屏。

通过Moto G73 5G，摩托罗拉为注重价格的消费者提供了一个很好的整体方案。然而，不那么明亮的IPS显示屏是一个明显的缺点。

说到这里，Moto G73 5G的显示屏可能成为许多潜在买家的障碍。摩托罗拉选择使用相当沉闷的IPS面板，而不是在Moto G72上发现的明亮的OLED显示屏。摩托G72.与前代产品不同，G73 5G也缺乏IP等级。而且，它仍然无法录制4K视频。

除了摩托G72，Moto G73 5G的替代品还包括以下手机三星Galaxy A34 5G和小米Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G.这两款设备与摩托罗拉处于相同的价格区间，能够达到120Hz的刷新率，但它们都配备了相当亮的OLED显示屏。

价格和可用性

如果你直接从摩托罗拉，摩托罗拉G73 5G将让你花费大约300欧元（330美元）。.它也可以从其他在线零售商处购买（例如：Amazon DE和英国亚马逊)，价格大致相同。不幸的是，这款手机还没有在美国上市。

Motorola Moto G73 5G - 2023-05-03 05/03/2023 v7
Manuel Masiero

Chassis

86%

Keyboard

69 / 75 → 92%

Pointing Device

88%

Connectivity

48 / 70 → 68%

Weight

90%

Battery

92%

Display

86%

Games Performance

30 / 64 → 47%

Application Performance

75 / 86 → 87%

Temperature

88%

Noise

100%

Audio

79 / 90 → 88%

Camera

74%

Average

77%

83%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Zhiwei Zhuang - Translator - 147 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2022

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 388017 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 摩托罗拉Moto G73 5G评测--尽管它的显示屏乏善可陈，但还是很精彩？

Manuel Masiero, 2023-05- 7 (Update: 2023-05- 7)

摩托罗拉Moto G73 5G评测--尽管它的显示屏乏善可陈，但还是很精彩？

潜在的竞争对手比较

外壳 - 塑料底盘，但有高级设计

尺寸比较

规格 - 8GB的内存和256GB的存储空间

微型SD卡读卡器

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

软件--近似于股票Android 13

连接性和GNSS - 良好的Wi-Fi 5和精确的GPS

电话和通话质量

摄像头 - 双摄像头设置

附件和保修 - 可选保护计划

输入设备和处理 - 电源按钮中集成指纹传感器

显示屏--与前代产品相比有明显的退步

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

性能 - 扎实的中段动力

游戏--120帧是可以做到的，但仍然是一个例外。

排放 - 温度高，但没有节流现象

温度

发言人

Motorola Moto G73 5G audio analysis

Motorola Moto G72 audio analysis

电池寿命 - 省电且持久

消耗功率

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

电池寿命

Pros

Cons

对摩托罗拉Moto G73 5G的评判

价格和可用性

More articles related to this device

Transparency

Pricecompare