Notebookcheck

小米11T Pro回顾。高端智能手机拥有极快的充电时间和长期的更新。

即使没有 "小米",也终于与三星相提并论。 11T系列最有趣的新功能之一是在规格表之外发现的--即在相对较长的软件支持。也就是说,这款高端手机内置的硬件在测试中也给我们留下了深刻的印象...
Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
5G Touchscreen Smartphone
小米11T Pro评测

在已经审查过 小米11T,我们现在也在测试11T系列的专业版。11T Pro与它的兄弟姐妹非常相似,但小米的高端手机比 "标准 "版有两个值得注意的优势。首先,11T Pro配备了2021年的旗舰SoC,即 骁龙888,其次,5000毫安时的电池可以在高达120瓦特的情况下快速充电。此外,高通芯片组允许以8K分辨率进行视频录制。

至于其他组件,这两款11T机型几乎没有任何区别,至少在纸面上是如此。专业版还采用了6.67英寸1080p+AMOLED显示屏,刷新率为120赫兹,UFS 3.1存储,包括8GB的内存,以及背面的三摄像头设置。

与11T相比,想要利用高通SoC和公司的HyperCharge技术的用户将不得不支付100欧元(约113美元)的溢价--小米11T Pro的128GB版本在德国的建议售价为649.90欧元(约734美元)。

, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 
Xiaomi 11T Pro (11 Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G 8 x 1.8 - 2.8 GHz, Cortex-X1 / A78 / A55 (Kryo 680)
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 660
Memory
8192 MB 
Display
6.67 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 395 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, AMOLED, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 256 GB 
, 224 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: acceleration sensor, gyroscope, proximity sensor, compass, barometer, OTG, Miracast, infrared port
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.2, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B2/​B4/​B5/​B6/​B8/​B19), 4G (B1/​B2/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B12/​B13/​B17/​B18/​B19/​B20/​B26/​B28/​B32/​B38/​B40/​B41/​B42/​B66), 5G (n1/​n3/​n5/​n7/​n8/​n20/​n28/​n38/​n40/​n41/​n66/​n77/​n78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.8 x 164.1 x 76.9
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 11
Camera
Primary Camera: 108 MPix (f/1.8, 26mm, 1/1.52", 0.7µm) 8MP (f/2.2, 120˚, 1/4", 1.12µm) 5MP (f/2.4, 50mm, 1/5.0", 1.12µm)
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix (f/2.5, 1/3.06", 1.0µm)
Additional features
Speakers: stereo, Keyboard: virtual, charger, case, USB cable, MIUI 12.5, 12 Months Warranty, Widevine L1, Camera2 API: Level 3, fanless
Weight
204 g, Power Supply: 121 g
Price
700 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible contenders in comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
87.4 %
12/2021
Xiaomi 11T Pro
SD 888 5G, Adreno 660
204 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.67"2400x1080
86.4 %
10/2021
Xiaomi 11T
Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9
203 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.67"2400x1080
87.1 %
04/2021
OnePlus 9
SD 888 5G, Adreno 660
192 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.55"2400x1080
86.7 %
10/2021
Motorola Edge 20 Pro
SD 870, Adreno 650
185 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.70"2400x1080
89.4 %
02/2021
Samsung Galaxy S21
Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14
169 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.20"2400x1080
87.1 %
02/2021
Xiaomi Mi 11
SD 888 5G, Adreno 660
196 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.81"3200x1440
月光白的小米11T Pro
月光白的小米11T Pro
小米11T Pro的天蓝色
小米11T Pro的天蓝色

11T Pro的外壳与小米11T的外壳并无不同。 小米11T,至少在外观上没有。甚至连颜色都是一样的,有 "陨石灰"、"月光白 "和 "天蓝色",这并不是什么大事,因为我们真的很喜欢小米手机的外观。虽然白色和蓝色的颜色选择是磨砂的,但我们评测样品的灰色背面更像是一种镜子。与陨石灰变体的高光外观相比,亚光表面自然使指纹不那么突出。

背面略带弧度的玻璃面板拿在手里感觉很舒服。总的来说,制造质量和感觉都达到了很高的水平。内置的按钮也牢牢地坐在边框里,压力点也令人愉快地牢固。11T Pro并不防水,但它确实有根据IP53的IP认证。这意味着这款机箱至少可以防止下雨或溅水。

前面的大猩猩玻璃Victus与边框平面结合。你是否喜欢这一点是一个品味问题。这种平面设计的一个消极方面是6.67英寸显示屏的顶部和底部的边框有点宽。这些在小米11中要薄得多。 小米11.这只导致了85.2%的坚实的屏占比。

小米11T Pro评测
小米11T Pro评测
小米11T Pro评测
小米11T Pro评测
小米11T Pro评测
小米11T Pro评测
小米11T Pro评测

Size comparison

164.1 mm 76.9 mm 8.8 mm 204 g164.1 mm 76.9 mm 8.8 mm 203 g164.3 mm 74.6 mm 8.06 mm 196 g163 mm 76 mm 8 mm 185 g160 mm 74.2 mm 8.7 mm 192 g151.7 mm 71.2 mm 7.9 mm 169 g

连接性 - 带有UFS存储的11T Pro

这家中国制造商提供128GB或256GB的UFS 3.1闪存。与之相比 11T,小米为Pro机型配备了LPDDR5而不是LPDDR4x内存。然而,11T Pro也没有提供超过8GB内存的版本。我们评测样本中的内部UFS存储容量为256GB,但用户开箱后只有224GB可用。不可能扩大存储空间。

双SIM卡功能以及用于快速连接外部配件的USB OTG都包含在这款高端手机的连接功能中。屏幕内容的无线图像传输(Miracast)在测试中也没有问题。一个使用USB 2.0标准的USB Type-C端口可用于有线数据传输。

小米11T Pro的Camera2 API支持Level 3,由于DRM Widevine L1的存在,有可能以高清质量观看流媒体内容。

底部(扬声器、USB接口、麦克风、卡盘)
底部(扬声器、USB接口、麦克风、卡盘)
左侧
左侧
右侧(按钮)
右侧(按钮)
顶部(麦克风、扬声器)
顶部(麦克风、扬声器)

软件 - 小米智能手机的长期更新

当涉及到其更新政策时,这家中国制造商现在可以得到一些加分。在 三星迈出了第一步,小米现在也终于承诺为其高端智能手机提供长期软件支持。对于小米11T Pro,这具体意味着三次主要的Android ,以及四年的安全更新。然而,由于安全补丁在8月份的水平,这款中国高端手机在测试时有点过时,这就是为什么我们不期望它在未来获得每月更新。至于软件的更新频率,目前还没有任何信息。

谷歌的Android 11版本被用作操作系统。制造商在库存Android 界面的基础上增加了自己的用户界面,即MIUI 12.5.7版。凭借其独立的通知中心、应用切换器和控制中心,MIUI 12的用户界面更倾向于Apple's iOS,而不是底层的Android 操作系统,但它提供了大量的定制选项和优化的系统界面。到现在,小米也在其MIUI界面中实现了适当的永远在线功能。

在测试期间,我们注意到有几个地方出现了横幅广告形式的简短广告,即MSA(MIUI系统广告)(例如在安装一个应用程序后)。相比之下,第三方应用程序的数量非常多,但这些臃肿的软件至少可以被卸载。

小米11T Pro评测
小米11T Pro评测
小米11T Pro评测
小米11T Pro评测

通信和GNSS - 小米11T Pro与5G

在通信方面,小米手机配备了蓝牙5.2、双SIM卡功能和5G,但它缺乏对毫米波的支持,以及用于近场通信的NFC芯片。除了5G标准,这款高端智能手机还可以使用总共21个LTE频段--包括28频段在内的德语国家的所有相关LTE频率都被覆盖。11T Pro也为旅行提供了最佳装备,例如前往美国。

在国内Wi-Fi网络中,小米手机支持快速的802.11ax标准与Wi-Fi 6,在我们的测量中产生了高传输率。然而,通过Wi-Fi 6E提供的6GHz频段作为标准的补充,并不能用于WLAN的使用。结合我们的Netgear Nighthawk AX12参考路由器,小米手机在接收和发送数据时都表现稳定。

Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12
Xiaomi 11T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
884 (817min - 939max) MBit/s ∼100% +7%
Xiaomi 11T Pro
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
827 (420min - 893max) MBit/s ∼94%
Samsung Galaxy S21
Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
789 (613min - 870max) MBit/s ∼89% -5%
Samsung Galaxy S21
Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
500 (390min - 572max) MBit/s ∼57% -40%
OnePlus 9
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
685 (654min - 709max) MBit/s ∼77% -17%
Motorola Edge 20 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
655 (597min - 675max) MBit/s ∼74% -21%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
519 (391min - 604max) MBit/s ∼59% -37%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.59 - 1599, n=285, last 2 years)
476 MBit/s ∼54% -42%
iperf3 Client (receive) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12
Xiaomi Mi 11
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
842 (329min - 976max) MBit/s ∼100% +2%
Xiaomi 11T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
836 (737min - 887max) MBit/s ∼99% +1%
Xiaomi 11T Pro
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
825 (762min - 872max) MBit/s ∼98%
Samsung Galaxy S21
Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
778 (678min - 837max) MBit/s ∼92% -6%
Samsung Galaxy S21
Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
650 (249min - 792max) MBit/s ∼77% -21%
OnePlus 9
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
777 (623min - 829max) MBit/s ∼92% -6%
Motorola Edge 20 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
731 (565min - 819max) MBit/s ∼87% -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (15.5 - 1414, n=285, last 2 years)
468 MBit/s ∼56% -43%
04590135180225270315360405450495540585630675720765810855Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø823 (762-872)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø813 (420-893)
室外的GPS测试
室外的GPS测试
在室内进行GPS测试
在室内进行GPS测试

为了能够更好地评估日常使用中的跟踪精度,我们带着11T Pro进行了一次短途旅行,并与Garmin Venue 2并行记录路线,以进行比较。在将近8公里的测试路线的终点,智能手机的GPS模块和智能手表之间只有50米的距离。

小米手机的追踪能力并不总是完美的,但在GPS日志的详细视图中的偏差很小,因此路线中几乎没有任何值得注意的不准确之处。11T Pro的精确度在某些地方甚至比佳明GPS更好。这款高端手机的GPS模块使用主要的卫星系统GPS(L1+L5)、GLONASS、QZSS和Galileo(E1+E5)来确定其位置。基于SBAS卫星的补充系统没有实施。

追踪比较
追踪比较
小米11T Pro vs. Garmin Venue 2
小米11T Pro vs. Garmin Venue 2
追踪比较
追踪比较

电话和通话质量 - 带有VoLTE的11T Pro

小米11T Pro评测
小米11T Pro评测

我们喜欢11T Pro在测试中的语音质量。由于有两个功能良好的麦克风,通过Skype进行沟通也很有说服力。在与小米手机的通话中,我们没有遇到任何麻烦的掉线或接收问题。声音被清晰地再现,电话另一端的用户也描述我们的声音听起来非常清晰。

小米手机的SAR值相对较低,为0.554W/kg(头部)和0.954W/kg(身体)。11T Pro还支持VoLTE或WLAN通话等标准。

摄像头 - 小米手机采用三摄像头设置

用小米11T Pro拍摄的自拍照
用小米11T Pro拍摄的自拍照
小米11T Pro的人像模式
小米11T Pro的人像模式

Omnivision OV16A1的1600万像素前置摄像头可以拍出有吸引力的自拍。然而,我们希望照片能更清晰一点。我们还对缺乏视频录制的UHD选项感到遗憾。

11T系列的重点显然是放在广角相机上。三星S5KHM2传感器(很可能)被用于此,就像在 小米11小米11i.1/1.52英寸的10800万像素传感器具有f/1.75光圈,因此即使在黑暗中也能捕捉到相对大量的光线,尤其是9个像素通过像素分层组合成一个巨大的 "超级像素"。

虽然照片在黑暗环境中照明良好,但噪音水平相当高,图像清晰度不是很突出--缺乏OIS在这里也起到了负面作用。尽管如此,11T Pro在日光下并没有显示出任何弱点,它提供了良好到非常好的结果。用10800万像素传感器拍摄的照片具有良好的动态范围和吸引人的清晰度。即使在边缘,模糊性也只是稍微明显。

然而,当涉及到变焦和超广角镜头时,高端手机仍然必须做出妥协。除了只有800万像素的低分辨率外,超广角摄像头在动态或清晰度水平方面并没有真正给我们留下深刻印象。此外,该相机镜头和广角镜头一样,只利用了EIS。由于缺乏长焦镜头,放大的照片显示出低水平的细节;甚至2倍变焦范围也不是很引人注目。

11T Pro的主摄像头可以以30帧/秒的速度录制最高8K的电影。然而,想要使用更高的帧率的用户仍将不得不满足于超高清(最高60 FPS)。在正在进行的视频录制过程中,它可以在两个镜头之间切换,但用主摄像头拍摄的对象会以相当温暖的颜色显示。

超广角
超广角
2倍变焦
5倍变焦
10倍变焦
108MP模式
小米11T Pro软件
小米11T Pro软件
小米11T Pro软件
小米11T Pro软件

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Wide angleWide angleLow light5x zoom Ultra-wide angle

在受控的照明条件下,我们用ColorChecker Passport和我们的测试图表对后置10800万像素主摄像头进行了进一步测试。我们分析了与实际参考颜色相比的色彩再现,以及在标准化条件下的锐度水平--首先是在完整的工作室照明下,然后是在1勒克斯的光线强度下。

这款高端智能手机的色彩还原度相当好,与这个价格段的竞争机型相比,DeltaE偏差为10.2,实际上没有任何重大缺陷。然而,一加9的一加9三星Galaxy S21表现出更低的DeltaE偏差。此外,在ColorChecker Passport中,特别是涉及到蓝色色调时,差异是清晰可见的。与参考色相比,典型的智能手机增亮,以及略微过暖的白平衡也是明显的。

我们测试图的图像清晰度处于良好水平。然而,图像的外围区域并不完全清晰,它们有时会表现出图像错误。

ColorChecker
15.3 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
17.1 ∆E
19.4 ∆E
12.4 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
20 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
16 ∆E
15 ∆E
12.6 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
12 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi 11T Pro: 10.16 ∆E min: 2.31 - max: 19.97 ∆E
ColorChecker
29.6 ∆E
55 ∆E
39.4 ∆E
35.3 ∆E
44.4 ∆E
63.3 ∆E
54.2 ∆E
35.7 ∆E
43.8 ∆E
28.2 ∆E
64.7 ∆E
63.9 ∆E
29.4 ∆E
47.7 ∆E
37.6 ∆E
76.8 ∆E
43.5 ∆E
43.4 ∆E
93.7 ∆E
71 ∆E
52 ∆E
37 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi 11T Pro: 46.94 ∆E min: 13.38 - max: 93.69 ∆E

配件和保修 - 小米11T Pro带充电器

11T Pro的充电器采用HyperCharge技术
11T Pro的充电器采用HyperCharge技术

我们称赞小米在包装盒中的内容。除了一条USB充电线和一个保护罩外,包装中还包含一个与小米HyperCharge技术兼容的模块化充电器,其额定功率为120瓦特。我们的评测样品还附带了一张开箱即用的保护膜。

小米智能手机提供为期一年的有限 保修.这家中国制造商不提供可选的保险或事故保护。

输入设备和处理 - 小米手机,480赫兹

电容式触摸屏对触摸输入有可靠的反应,大猩猩玻璃面板的滑行性能也很好。使用该显示屏还得益于120赫兹的高刷新率,这使得图像转换和滚动菜单或浏览器变得非常流畅。电容式触摸屏还提供了非常低的触摸延迟。在某些应用(如游戏)中,11T Pro检测到的可能的用户输入次数高达480次/秒。

使用面部识别,小米手机可以通过面部数据解锁,但这是通过2D程序完成的,因此不是很安全。指纹扫描仪已被集成到电源按钮中,提供安全的生物识别解锁选项,其非常高的识别率给人留下深刻印象。我们还发现它的位置选择得很好。

小米11T Pro评测
小米11T Pro评测
小米11T Pro评测

显示屏 - 11T Pro采用OLED面板

子像素网格
子像素网格
直流调光模式下的PWM
直流调光模式下的PWM

小米11T Pro机型采用6.67英寸HDR10+认证的AMOLED面板,分辨率为2400x1080像素,刷新率为120 Hz。应该注意的是,显示屏默认设置为60赫兹,必须在显示屏设置中手动改变为120赫兹的刷新率。专业版机型不提供自适应刷新率,如 小米11那样。

中国制造商表示,11T Pro的峰值亮度为800尼特,HDR内容的峰值亮度为1000尼特,我们也能够通过测量来确认这一点。我们在APL50测试中测得的亮度为980cd/m²--但APL10测试肯定仍有改进的余地。

这款高端手机使用脉冲宽度调制(PWM)进行亮度控制,只要亮度调到59%以下,频率就会相当高,达到253至490赫兹。在此之上,我们测量的频率为120赫兹,但这里的振幅曲线的波动要低得多。在设置菜单中还可以找到直流调光模式。然而,它只能在使用60赫兹刷新率时实施。

765
cd/m²
780
cd/m²
795
cd/m²
778
cd/m²
778
cd/m²
791
cd/m²
774
cd/m²
778
cd/m²
798
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 798 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 781.9 cd/m² Minimum: 2.63 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 96 %
Center on Battery: 778 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.6 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.4
ΔE Greyscale 2.9 | 0.64-98 Ø5.7
97.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.2
Xiaomi 11T Pro
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.67
Xiaomi 11T
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.67
OnePlus 9
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.55
Motorola Edge 20 Pro
OLED, 2400x1080, 6.70
Samsung Galaxy S21
Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 2400x1080, 6.20
Xiaomi Mi 11
LED DotDisplay, 3200x1440, 6.81
Screen
5%
32%
9%
3%
19%
Brightness middle
778
781
0%
731
-6%
666
-14%
790
2%
840
8%
Brightness
782
782
0%
739
-5%
644
-18%
793
1%
845
8%
Brightness Distribution
96
94
-2%
96
0%
93
-3%
97
1%
98
2%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.6
2
-25%
0.59
63%
1.4
12%
2.2
-38%
1.2
25%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
4.5
2.9
36%
1.3
71%
2.65
41%
4.2
7%
2.7
40%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.9
2.3
21%
0.9
69%
1.9
34%
1.6
45%
2
31%
Gamma
2.2 100%
2.28 96%
2.243 98%
2.209 100%
2.13 103%
2.26 97%
CCT
6537 99%
6852 95%
6573 99%
6646 98%
6497 100%
6492 100%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 490.2 Hz ≤ 59 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 490.2 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 59 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 490.2 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 20851 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

像在11T模型,小米在专业模型中使用了OLED显示屏,个别像素可以完全关闭,这导致了 "绝对 "的黑色。因此,对比度(理论上)倾向于无限大。在我们用CalMAN软件和分光光度计进行的测试中,小米手机的显示屏被证明是很好的校准,它提供了低色彩偏差(在标准配置文件中)。

此外,这款高端手机提供了很多影响不同配置文件的设置,以及个别显示参数,如饱和度或伽玛。面板的色温也可以通过真实显示功能根据环境光线自动调整。

色彩准确度(目标色彩空间:sRGB,配置文件:标准,正常)。
色彩准确度(目标色彩空间:sRGB,配置文件:标准,正常)。
色彩空间(目标色彩空间:sRGB,配置文件:标准,正常)。
色彩空间(目标色彩空间:sRGB,配置文件:标准,正常)。
灰度(目标色彩空间:sRGB,配置文件:标准,正常)。
灰度(目标色彩空间:sRGB,配置文件:标准,正常)。
色彩饱和度(目标色彩空间:sRGB,配置文件:标准,正常)。
色彩饱和度(目标色彩空间:sRGB,配置文件:标准,正常)。

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
2.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.2 ms rise
↘ 1.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (23.7 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
2.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.2 ms rise
↘ 1.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (37.5 ms).

由于采用了OLED技术,可视角度的稳定性非常好,只有在非常平坦的可视角度才会有轻微的亮度损失。

这款高端智能手机被证明是日常户外使用的最佳装备。由于高亮度和强对比度,即使在阳光直射下和玻璃表面的伴随反射下,内容也应保持容易辨认。应该注意的是,在没有启用亮度传感器的情况下,最大亮度只有485cd/m²。

小米11T Pro评测
小米11T Pro评测
小米11T Pro评测

性能--搭载骁龙888的小米11T Pro

与之相比 小米11T11T Pro配备的是高通SoC,而不是联发科的Dimensity 1200。 联发科Dimensity 1200.这款手机骁龙888集成了一个基于ARM Cortex-X1架构的快速 "Prime Core",速度高达2.84 GHz,三个基于Cortex A78的快速性能内核(2.42 GHz),以及四个ARM Cortex-A55内核,最大时钟频率为1.8 GHz。与之相伴的是Adreno 660作为图形单元。

在我们的基准测试包中,骁龙888在11T Pro中也显示了其令人印象深刻的性能。然而,小米手机在一些测试中的表现相对较差,特别是在浏览应用程序中。在GFXBench基准测试中,我们还观察到图形性能有相当大的下降,由于散热问题,屏幕上的数值降低到60帧(见 "排放 "部分)。在长时间的HFR游戏过程中,这可能是个问题,因为11T Pro不能使用完整的120 Hz。然而,屏幕上的速率有时普遍很弱。

在日常使用中,小米手机运行非常流畅,几乎没有任何滞后。系统性能是一流的,应用程序的加载时间也非常短。这也是由于UFS存储驱动器的快速读写率。然而,对于3.1标准来说,这些速度相对较低,因为骁龙888应该(理论上)达到UFS存储的全部带宽。

Geekbench 5.3
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
976 Points ∼86%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
857 Points ∼75% -12%
OnePlus 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
1124 Points ∼99% +15%
Motorola Edge 20 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 12288
974 Points ∼86% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S21
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192
1003 Points ∼88% +3%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
1136 Points ∼100% +16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (976 - 1156, n=23)
1113 Points ∼98% +14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (58 - 1755, n=267, last 2 years)
612 Points ∼54% -37%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
3598 Points ∼95%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
2916 Points ∼77% -19%
OnePlus 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
3653 Points ∼97% +2%
Motorola Edge 20 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 12288
2986 Points ∼79% -17%
Samsung Galaxy S21
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192
3228 Points ∼85% -10%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
3784 Points ∼100% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (3204 - 3810, n=23)
3582 Points ∼95% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (248 - 4914, n=267, last 2 years)
2073 Points ∼55% -42%
Vulkan Score 5.3 (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
4367 Points ∼67%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
5078 Points ∼78% +16%
OnePlus 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
3894 Points ∼60% -11%
Motorola Edge 20 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 12288
3159 Points ∼48% -28%
Samsung Galaxy S21
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192
6524 Points ∼100% +49%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
4279 Points ∼66% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (3894 - 6176, n=22)
4741 Points ∼73% +9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (72 - 7701, n=173, last 2 years)
2233 Points ∼34% -49%
OpenCL Score 5.3 (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
4786 Points ∼64%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
5037 Points ∼68% +5%
OnePlus 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
4566 Points ∼61% -5%
Motorola Edge 20 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 12288
3482 Points ∼47% -27%
Samsung Galaxy S21
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192
7433 Points ∼100% +55%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
4674 Points ∼63% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (3100 - 4786, n=22)
4598 Points ∼62% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (255 - 7514, n=174, last 2 years)
2269 Points ∼31% -53%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
13865 Points ∼95%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
12120 Points ∼83% -13%
Motorola Edge 20 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 12288
11986 Points ∼82% -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (11705 - 17085, n=16)
14671 Points ∼100% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4436 - 17085, n=92, last 2 years)
9941 Points ∼68% -28%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
8065 Points ∼81%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
8041 Points ∼81% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S21
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192
7933 Points ∼80% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (8065 - 11302, n=17)
9897 Points ∼100% +23%
Average of class Smartphone
  (149 - 11895, n=256, last 2 years)
4500 Points ∼45% -44%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
15764 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
11770 Points ∼75% -25%
Samsung Galaxy S21
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192
9889 Points ∼63% -37%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (10491 - 16863, n=17)
14836 Points ∼94% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (122 - 31940, n=256, last 2 years)
5864 Points ∼37% -63%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
2975 Points ∼63%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
3813 Points ∼81% +28%
Samsung Galaxy S21
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192
4688 Points ∼100% +58%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (2975 - 5344, n=17)
4657 Points ∼99% +57%
Average of class Smartphone
  (651 - 6394, n=254, last 2 years)
3144 Points ∼67% +6%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
7176 Points ∼77%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
7256 Points ∼78% +1%
OnePlus 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
0 Points ∼0% -100%
Samsung Galaxy S21
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192
6717 Points ∼72% -6%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
9343 Points ∼100% +30%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (6110 - 9839, n=18)
8631 Points ∼92% +20%
Average of class Smartphone
  (91 - 9839, n=258, last 2 years)
3708 Points ∼40% -48%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
11753 Points ∼98%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
8353 Points ∼69% -29%
Samsung Galaxy S21
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192
7680 Points ∼64% -35%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
12023 Points ∼100% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (7930 - 12914, n=18)
11673 Points ∼97% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (73 - 16221, n=258, last 2 years)
4363 Points ∼36% -63%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
3065 Points ∼58%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
4971 Points ∼95% +62%
Samsung Galaxy S21
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192
4668 Points ∼89% +52%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
5249 Points ∼100% +71%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (2579 - 5366, n=18)
4612 Points ∼88% +50%
Average of class Smartphone
  (635 - 5793, n=258, last 2 years)
3172 Points ∼60% +3%
Wild Life Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
5805 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
4179 Points ∼72% -28%
OnePlus 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
5786 Points ∼100% 0%
Motorola Edge 20 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 12288
4274 Points ∼73% -26%
Samsung Galaxy S21
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192
5815 Points ∼100% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
5599 Points ∼96% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (3958 - 5942, n=22)
5661 Points ∼97% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (153 - 9927, n=139, last 2 years)
2974 Points ∼51% -49%
Wild Life Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
5803 Points ∼97%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
4194 Points ∼70% -28%
OnePlus 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
5751 Points ∼96% -1%
Motorola Edge 20 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 12288
4233 Points ∼71% -27%
Samsung Galaxy S21
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192
5966 Points ∼100% +3%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
5678 Points ∼95% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (3959 - 5925, n=22)
5598 Points ∼94% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (174 - 11700, n=136, last 2 years)
3079 Points ∼52% -47%
Wild Life Extreme (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
1537 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
1291 Points ∼84% -16%
Motorola Edge 20 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 12288
1243 Points ∼81% -19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (1236 - 1559, n=17)
1505 Points ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (102 - 3080, n=86, last 2 years)
926 Points ∼60% -40%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
1483 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
1205 Points ∼81% -19%
Motorola Edge 20 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 12288
1223 Points ∼82% -18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (974 - 1555, n=17)
1395 Points ∼94% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (101 - 4236, n=85, last 2 years)
937 Points ∼63% -37%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
121 fps ∼85%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
116 fps ∼82% -4%
OnePlus 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
61 fps ∼43% -50%
Motorola Edge 20 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 12288
142 fps ∼100% +17%
Samsung Galaxy S21
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192
110 fps ∼77% -9%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
120 fps ∼85% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (60 - 143, n=17)
105 fps ∼74% -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8.2 - 143, n=210, last 2 years)
64.6 fps ∼45% -47%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
262 fps ∼95%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
185 fps ∼67% -29%
OnePlus 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
275 fps ∼100% +5%
Motorola Edge 20 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 12288
223 fps ∼81% -15%
Samsung Galaxy S21
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192
137 fps ∼50% -48%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
268 fps ∼97% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (173 - 290, n=17)
245 fps ∼89% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.3 - 425, n=210, last 2 years)
122 fps ∼44% -53%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
121 fps ∼100%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
106 fps ∼88% -12%
OnePlus 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
60 fps ∼50% -50%
Motorola Edge 20 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 12288
116 fps ∼96% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S21
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192
119 fps ∼98% -2%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
91 fps ∼75% -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (55 - 121, n=17)
94.6 fps ∼78% -22%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.5 - 121, n=209, last 2 years)
51.9 fps ∼43% -57%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
130 fps ∼82%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
122 fps ∼77% -6%
OnePlus 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
101 fps ∼64% -22%
Motorola Edge 20 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 12288
132 fps ∼84% +2%
Samsung Galaxy S21
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192
143 fps ∼91% +10%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
158 fps ∼100% +22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (101 - 177, n=17)
140 fps ∼89% +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 251, n=210, last 2 years)
71 fps ∼45% -45%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
101 fps ∼95%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
75 fps ∼71% -26%
OnePlus 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
57 fps ∼54% -44%
Motorola Edge 20 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 12288
80 fps ∼75% -21%
Samsung Galaxy S21
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192
106 fps ∼100% +5%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
59 fps ∼56% -42%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (36 - 105, n=17)
72.8 fps ∼69% -28%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.1 - 106, n=208, last 2 years)
40.3 fps ∼38% -60%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
109 fps ∼98%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
79 fps ∼71% -28%
OnePlus 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
96 fps ∼86% -12%
Motorola Edge 20 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 12288
91 fps ∼82% -17%
Samsung Galaxy S21
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192
83 fps ∼75% -24%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
111 fps ∼100% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (69 - 121, n=17)
98.1 fps ∼88% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 169, n=208, last 2 years)
48.9 fps ∼44% -55%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
55 fps ∼95%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
44 fps ∼76% -20%
OnePlus 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
48 fps ∼83% -13%
Motorola Edge 20 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 12288
50 fps ∼86% -9%
Samsung Galaxy S21
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192
58 fps ∼100% +5%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
33 fps ∼57% -40%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (26 - 61, n=17)
45.4 fps ∼78% -17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.3 - 61, n=207, last 2 years)
25.1 fps ∼43% -54%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
65 fps ∼97%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
46 fps ∼69% -29%
OnePlus 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
42 fps ∼63% -35%
Motorola Edge 20 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 12288
58 fps ∼87% -11%
Samsung Galaxy S21
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192
42 fps ∼63% -35%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
67 fps ∼100% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (42 - 72, n=17)
59 fps ∼88% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.8 - 96.6, n=207, last 2 years)
29.3 fps ∼44% -55%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
63 fps ∼100%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
49 fps ∼78% -22%
OnePlus 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
58 fps ∼92% -8%
Motorola Edge 20 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 12288
49 fps ∼78% -22%
Samsung Galaxy S21
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192
46 fps ∼73% -27%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
41 fps ∼65% -35%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (32 - 73, n=22)
55.2 fps ∼88% -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.5 - 73, n=268, last 2 years)
25.8 fps ∼41% -59%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
71 fps ∼90%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
53 fps ∼67% -25%
OnePlus 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
57 fps ∼72% -20%
Motorola Edge 20 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 12288
57 fps ∼72% -20%
Samsung Galaxy S21
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192
49 fps ∼62% -31%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
79 fps ∼100% +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (46 - 87, n=23)
70.3 fps ∼89% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.9 - 257, n=268, last 2 years)
30.4 fps ∼38% -57%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
42 fps ∼93%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
33 fps ∼73% -21%
OnePlus 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
41 fps ∼91% -2%
Motorola Edge 20 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 12288
31 fps ∼69% -26%
Samsung Galaxy S21
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192
45 fps ∼100% +7%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
25 fps ∼56% -40%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (25 - 46, n=22)
37.8 fps ∼84% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.1 - 60, n=269, last 2 years)
17.3 fps ∼38% -59%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
27 fps ∼93%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
21 fps ∼72% -22%
OnePlus 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
28 fps ∼97% +4%
Motorola Edge 20 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 12288
22 fps ∼76% -19%
Samsung Galaxy S21
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192
25 fps ∼86% -7%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
29 fps ∼100% +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (19 - 32, n=22)
27.5 fps ∼95% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.7 - 101, n=269, last 2 years)
11.7 fps ∼40% -57%
Antutu v9 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
641033 Points ∼84%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
570375 Points ∼75% -11%
Motorola Edge 20 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 12288
692521 Points ∼91% +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (636471 - 815441, n=13)
764164 Points ∼100% +19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (117053 - 962824, n=72, last 2 years)
506400 Points ∼66% -21%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
613740 Points ∼86%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
540464 Points ∼76% -12%
OnePlus 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
713309 Points ∼100% +16%
Samsung Galaxy S21
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192
600164 Points ∼84% -2%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
700592 Points ∼98% +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (569595 - 740847, n=12)
677749 Points ∼95% +10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53335 - 727247, n=178, last 2 years)
356772 Points ∼50% -42%
AImark - Score v2.x (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
257549 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
71546 Points ∼28% -72%
OnePlus 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
Points ∼0% -100%
Motorola Edge 20 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 12288
Points ∼0% -100%
Samsung Galaxy S21
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192
228879 Points ∼89% -11%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
209984 Points ∼82% -18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (171404 - 264766, n=12)
241574 Points ∼94% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4293 - 264766, n=95, last 2 years)
65496 Points ∼25% -75%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
6201 Points ∼95%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
5319 Points ∼81% -14%
OnePlus 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
6537 Points ∼100% +5%
Motorola Edge 20 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 12288
6031 Points ∼92% -3%
Samsung Galaxy S21
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192
6030 Points ∼92% -3%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
6361 Points ∼97% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (5908 - 6959, n=16)
6488 Points ∼99% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (615 - 8124, n=193, last 2 years)
3937 Points ∼60% -37%
System (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
10254 Points ∼88%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
9292 Points ∼80% -9%
OnePlus 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
11627 Points ∼100% +13%
Motorola Edge 20 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 12288
8976 Points ∼77% -12%
Samsung Galaxy S21
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192
10530 Points ∼91% +3%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
10377 Points ∼89% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (9696 - 11774, n=16)
10848 Points ∼93% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1160 - 19657, n=193, last 2 years)
7133 Points ∼61% -30%
Memory (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
6584 Points ∼75%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
7144 Points ∼81% +9%
OnePlus 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
7526 Points ∼86% +14%
Motorola Edge 20 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 12288
7457 Points ∼85% +13%
Samsung Galaxy S21
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192
5924 Points ∼67% -10%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
8789 Points ∼100% +33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (5352 - 9044, n=16)
7293 Points ∼83% +11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (522 - 9044, n=193, last 2 years)
4621 Points ∼53% -30%
Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
13354 Points ∼91%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
7516 Points ∼51% -44%
OnePlus 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
12938 Points ∼88% -3%
Motorola Edge 20 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 12288
12245 Points ∼84% -8%
Samsung Galaxy S21
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192
14636 Points ∼100% +10%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
12732 Points ∼87% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (9399 - 15739, n=16)
13567 Points ∼93% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (349 - 25642, n=193, last 2 years)
6279 Points ∼43% -53%
Web (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
1658 Points ∼98%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
1604 Points ∼95% -3%
OnePlus 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
1627 Points ∼96% -2%
Motorola Edge 20 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 12288
1654 Points ∼98% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S21
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192
1448 Points ∼85% -13%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
1434 Points ∼85% -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (1434 - 1983, n=16)
1696 Points ∼100% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10 - 2392, n=193, last 2 years)
1333 Points ∼79% -20%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Xiaomi 11T Pro (MS Edge)
116.326 Points ∼100%
Motorola Edge 20 Pro (Chrome 94)
93.729 Points ∼81% -19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G (61.3 - 119, n=12)
93.7 Points ∼81% -19%
Xiaomi Mi 11 (Chrome 88)
83.152 Points ∼71% -29%
Samsung Galaxy S21 (Chrome 88.0.4324.152)
65.132 Points ∼56% -44%
OnePlus 9 (MS Edge)
61.34 Points ∼53% -47%
Average of class Smartphone (12.4 - 182, n=187, last 2 years)
55.2 Points ∼47% -53%
Xiaomi 11T (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
51.758 Points ∼44% -56%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Xiaomi 11T Pro (Chrome96)
203.642 Points ∼100%
Motorola Edge 20 Pro (Chrome 94)
170.632 Points ∼84% -16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G (77 - 210, n=16)
164 Points ∼81% -19%
Xiaomi Mi 11 (Chrome 88)
137.89 Points ∼68% -32%
OnePlus 9 (MS Edge)
119.23 Points ∼59% -41%
Xiaomi 11T (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
117.59 Points ∼58% -42%
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 414, n=195, last 2 years)
101 Points ∼50% -50%
Samsung Galaxy S21 (Chrome 88.0.4324.152)
98.787 Points ∼49% -51%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Xiaomi 11T Pro (MS Edge)
85.4 runs/min ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G (46.9 - 114, n=11)
80.8 runs/min ∼95% -5%
Samsung Galaxy S21 (Chrome 88.0.4324.152)
74.1 runs/min ∼87% -13%
Motorola Edge 20 Pro (Chrome 94)
71.88 runs/min ∼84% -16%
Xiaomi Mi 11 (Chrome 88)
62.8 runs/min ∼74% -26%
OnePlus 9 (MS Edge)
54.65 runs/min ∼64% -36%
Xiaomi 11T (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
54.1 runs/min ∼63% -37%
Average of class Smartphone (9 - 244, n=172, last 2 years)
54.1 runs/min ∼63% -37%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Xiaomi 11T Pro (MS Edge)
147 Points ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G (103 - 166, n=14)
141 Points ∼96% -4%
Motorola Edge 20 Pro (Chrome 94)
127 Points ∼86% -14%
Xiaomi Mi 11 (Chrome 88)
124 Points ∼84% -16%
OnePlus 9 (MS Edge)
119 Points ∼81% -19%
Samsung Galaxy S21 (Chrome 88.0.4324.152)
114 Points ∼78% -22%
Average of class Smartphone (20 - 252, n=199, last 2 years)
83.5 Points ∼57% -43%
Xiaomi 11T (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
70 Points ∼48% -52%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Motorola Edge 20 Pro (Chrome 94)
39985 Points ∼100% +18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G (23491 - 46075, n=16)
34761 Points ∼87% +2%
Xiaomi 11T Pro (MS Edge)
34006 Points ∼85%
Xiaomi 11T (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
29912 Points ∼75% -12%
Xiaomi Mi 11 (Chrome 88)
27539 Points ∼69% -19%
Samsung Galaxy S21 (Chrome 88.0.4324.152)
25656 Points ∼64% -25%
OnePlus 9 (Chrome89)
23843 Points ∼60% -30%
Average of class Smartphone (1986 - 64222, n=205, last 2 years)
19803 Points ∼50% -42%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (414 - 29635, n=207, last 2 years)
3588 ms * ∼100% -191%
Samsung Galaxy S21 (Chrome 88.0.4324.152)
1809.6 ms * ∼50% -47%
Xiaomi Mi 11 (Chrome 88)
1721.5 ms * ∼48% -40%
OnePlus 9 (Chrome89)
1692.34 ms * ∼47% -37%
Xiaomi 11T (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
1444.3 ms * ∼40% -17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G (919 - 1841, n=16)
1360 ms * ∼38% -10%
Xiaomi 11T Pro (MS Edge)
1232.3 ms * ∼34%
Motorola Edge 20 Pro (Chrome 94)
1176.4 ms * ∼33% +5%

* ... smaller is better

Xiaomi 11T ProXiaomi 11TOnePlus 9Motorola Edge 20 ProSamsung Galaxy S21Xiaomi Mi 11Average 256 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-14%
1%
-5%
25%
12%
11%
-43%
Sequential Read 256KB
1786.9
1789.59
0%
1872.3
5%
1698.5
-5%
1647.8
-8%
1614.92
-10%
1763 ?(1330 - 2037, n=27)
-1%
846 ?(45.6 - 2037, n=270, last 2 years)
-53%
Sequential Write 256KB
786.88
942.08
20%
739.39
-6%
723.09
-8%
1095.35
39%
754.41
-4%
847 ?(552 - 1559, n=27)
8%
390 ?(11.9 - 1465, n=270, last 2 years)
-50%
Random Read 4KB
231.65
139.3
-40%
225.38
-3%
245.72
6%
309.71
34%
278.54
20%
255 ?(181 - 325, n=27)
10%
149 ?(13.5 - 325, n=270, last 2 years)
-36%
Random Write 4KB
207.24
133.27
-36%
221.45
7%
179.64
-13%
282.64
36%
289.32
40%
263 ?(180 - 449, n=27)
27%
141 ?(5.5 - 449, n=270, last 2 years)
-32%

游戏--小米智能手机可以进行游戏

我们通过我们的合作伙伴GameBench对游戏性能进行了仔细研究。使用Play Store中的游戏标题。中国制造商为此提供了一个 "游戏加速 "模式,它提供了几种设置,同时它还记录了系统的性能,甚至是当前的FPS率。

可以选择超高清设置的射击游戏《PUBG》移动版,使用最高级别的细节,以40帧/秒的速度流畅地呈现。尽管如此,OLED面板的全120赫兹既不能使用高也不能使用低图形。这款高端手机在这里最多只能管理60帧的画面。我们的测量没有发现任何明显的帧率下降。

令人惊讶的是,11T Pro在Armajet中也 "只 "实现了平均76帧,尽管竞技场射击游戏应该支持OLED面板的全120赫兹。

05101520253035404550556065707580859095Tooltip
; Armajet: Ø75.6 (59-98)
; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø59.7 (43-61)
; PUBG Mobile; Balanced: Ø59.5 (45-61)
; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø59.7 (50-62)
; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD: Ø40 (38-41)

排放--小米11T Pro并不总是保持低温

温度

小米11T Pro在几次基准测试后出现过热现象
小米11T Pro在几次基准测试后出现过热现象

与之相比 小米11在那里,由于过热保护,基准测试很快就中止了,在小米公司的最新高端手机上,测试(理论上)运行没有问题。然而,我们也能够通过GFXBench基准测试和3DMark压力测试对11T Pro进行连续60分钟的压力测试,将系统推向极限。令人惊讶的是,机箱的表面温度绝对保持在极限之内。即使在负载和较长时间的游戏过程中,11T Pro也会明显发热,但最高温度为35°C(约95°F),对于骁龙888设备来说,它是比较凉爽的。

不幸的是,小米的这款高端手机在运行具有挑战性的曼哈顿测试(OpenGL ES 3.1)时,结束了GFXBench电池测试,出现了问题,所以无法评估该测试。然而,只要不是一直执行野生生活压力测试(整个测试的重复次数超过三次),就可以顺利运行。

在95%的情况下,11T Pro的一致性与它的11T的兄弟姐妹相似,但总体上要强大得多。该骁龙888在野外生活极限压力测试中也出现了轻微的节流现象,稳定性为91%。

Max. Load
 34.4 °C34.1 °C31.9 °C 
 34.4 °C34.6 °C31.8 °C 
 34 °C33.7 °C30.9 °C 
Maximum: 34.6 °C
Average: 33.3 °C
31 °C32.8 °C34.2 °C
30.1 °C31.6 °C34.1 °C
29.2 °C30.3 °C32.8 °C
Maximum: 34.2 °C
Average: 31.8 °C
Power Supply (max.)  26.8 °C | Room Temperature 21.4 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.3 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34.6 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22 to 52.9 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34.2 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.1 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Motorola Edge 20 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.4 (25.7min) % ∼100% +5%
Xiaomi 11T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
95.2 (23.7min) % ∼96% +1%
Xiaomi 11T Pro
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
94.4 (33.3min) % ∼95%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
90.2 (5064min) % ∼91% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S21
Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
56.5 (3290min) % ∼57% -40%
OnePlus 9
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
56.2 (3203min) % ∼57% -40%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Motorola Edge 20 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.8 (7.49min) % ∼100% +10%
Xiaomi 11T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
91 (6.98min) % ∼91% +1%
Xiaomi 11T Pro
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
90.5 (8.3min) % ∼91%
05101520253035Tooltip
Xiaomi 11T Pro Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.5.1: Ø8.58 (8.3-9.17)
Xiaomi 11T Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.5.1: Ø7.08 (6.98-7.67)
Motorola Edge 20 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.5.1: Ø7.5 (7.49-7.5)
Xiaomi 11T Pro Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø34.3 (33.3-35.2)
Xiaomi 11T Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø24.6 (23.7-24.8)
Motorola Edge 20 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø25.8 (25.7-25.9)
小米11T Pro评测
小米11T Pro评测

发言人

11T Pro中的双扬声器可提供超过88分贝的最大音量和非常体面的声音。相对于 小米11T,Pro机型的音频系统由哈曼卡顿优化,支持杜比视界。

虽然专业机型的两个扬声器缺乏一点深度,但由于线性的高声和相当的中声,我们喜欢这种声音体验,尽管低声范围的再现有点太薄。

耳机或外部扬声器可以用电缆连接到USB-C端口。喜欢使用蓝牙进行无线输出的用户可以获得完整的音频编解码器。支持SBC、AAC、aptX、aptXHD和aptX自适应,以及LDAC和LHDC。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.836.1252429.53116.124.84027.628.55032.331.16323.423.78022281002236.51252140.916017.948.820013.348.825015.253.231513.257.340011.560.550012.267.963012.369.480013.372100014.577.5125012.275.8160011.277.2200011.777.8250012.177.5315012.777.5400013.678500013.176.9630013.678.5800013.175.51000013.673.91250013.666.61600013.561.8SPL2588.4N0.675.8median 13.3median 72Delta1.210.24346.236.838.436.82830.630.23435.52931.725.523.129.322.423.927.114.237.411.344.511.752.29.755.49.357.511.860.413.760.717.364.716.271.411.172.410.373.210.470.611.672.812.674.713.973.515.265.115.663.716.369.716.571.116.460.717.15368.865.971.426.48322.219.226.50.853.5median 13.9median 63.72.410.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi 11T ProOnePlus 9
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi 11T Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 23%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 30% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

OnePlus 9 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.8% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 34% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 23%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 59% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

电池寿命 - 小米手机的充电速度超快

能源消耗

对于一款 骁龙888智能手机11T Pro显示出一贯温和的功耗。然而,GFXBench的测量结果显示,在显示亮度为150cd/m²的情况下,高通SoC的耗电量要高于摩托罗拉Edge 20 Pro运行 骁龙870.

电池容量为5,000毫安时,支持非常快速的有线充电,最高可达120瓦特。MTW(Multiple Tab Winding)电池技术应该是为了降低11T Pro中双芯电池的内阻,并在更高的功耗下实现更好的热控制。据小米称,在800次充电循环后,仍应保留约80%的原始容量。

使用120瓦的充电器,11T系列的专业机型可在21分钟内完全充电。也就是说,不支持无线充电。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.04 / 0.19 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.81 / 1.92 / 1.96 Watt
Load midlight 4.29 / 9.93 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Xiaomi 11T Pro
5000 mAh
Xiaomi 11T
5000 mAh
OnePlus 9
4500 mAh
Motorola Edge 20 Pro
4500 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S21
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 11
4600 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
6%
-15%
29%
-13%
-31%
-6%
2%
Idle Minimum *
0.81
0.78
4%
0.9
-11%
0.7
14%
1.1
-36%
1.57
-94%
1.068 ?(0.46 - 1.8, n=22)
-32%
0.936 ?(0.12 - 2.5, n=219, last 2 years)
-16%
Idle Average *
1.92
1.86
3%
1.7
11%
0.9
53%
1.61
16%
1.92
-0%
1.58 ?(0.74 - 2.6, n=22)
18%
1.775 ?(0.65 - 3.94, n=219, last 2 years)
8%
Idle Maximum *
1.96
1.88
4%
2.7
-38%
1.2
39%
1.78
9%
1.94
1%
1.739 ?(0.78 - 3.1, n=22)
11%
2 ?(0.69 - 4.01, n=219, last 2 years)
-2%
Load Average *
4.29
3.98
7%
5.4
-26%
4.6
-7%
6.47
-51%
6.32
-47%
5.54 ?(4.21 - 6.7, n=22)
-29%
4.47 ?(2.1 - 8.4, n=219, last 2 years)
-4%
Load Maximum *
9.93
8.78
12%
11.1
-12%
5.5
45%
10.12
-2%
11.65
-17%
9.84 ?(5.89 - 11.7, n=22)
1%
7.37 ?(3.56 - 12.3, n=219, last 2 years)
26%

* ... smaller is better

Energy consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

0123456789101112Tooltip
Xiaomi 11T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G: Ø6.14 (1.143-12.4)
Motorola Edge 20 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G: Ø4.07 (0.792-7.39)

Energy consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910Tooltip
Xiaomi 11T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø10.1 (9.66-10.5)
Motorola Edge 20 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø5.55 (5.15-5.88)
Xiaomi 11T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G; Idle 1min: Ø1.286 (1.125-1.576)
Motorola Edge 20 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G; Idle 1min: Ø0.875 (0.743-1.098)

电池寿命

这款高端手机的电池运行时间是在启用120赫兹刷新率的情况下确定的。11T Pro在我们的实际Wi-Fi测试以及禁用WLAN模块的视频播放测试中取得了非常好的速率,在每项测试中分别持续了近14小时和23小时。 即使在满负荷的情况下,11T Pro对于120赫兹的智能手机也有出色的续航能力。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
29h 24min
WiFi Websurfing
13h 54min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
22h 53min
Load (maximum brightness)
5h 25min