沙发上的“笔记本杀手”？——华为MatePad Pro Max评测

Name: Huawei MatePad Pro Max
Brand: Huawei

大。更大。最大。

华为MatePad Pro Max旨在兼具平板电脑和笔记本电脑的双重功能，将超大屏幕、强劲性能与智能配件融为一体。但它在日常使用中真的能取代电脑吗？还是说它终究“只是”一台平板电脑？
Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 08/29/2026 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
5G Android Tablet Touchscreen

华为MatePad Pro Max评测总结

华为MatePad Pro Max最突出的特点在于其超大、超高亮度的OLED显示屏，配备出色的PaperMatte哑光涂层，做工精良，且扬声器性能强劲。得益于完善的输入设备与配件支持，这款平板电脑在处理生产力任务时，完全可以作为个人电脑的有力替代品。麒麟9030 Pro在日常使用中的表现良好，但在图形性能方面，华为却远远落后于竞争对手。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

Test device courtesy of Huawei Germany

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

在软件方面也存在一些妥协：缺乏谷歌服务、预装了大量第三方软件以及广告的存在，这些都削弱了本应相当全面的整体体验。缺少 6 GHz Wi-Fi 以及相对较短的电池续航时间也导致其评分受损。另一方面，Pro Max 凭借出色的连接性、低发热以及极致纤薄的设计赢得了好评。尽管如此，它仍是一款令人印象深刻的高端平板电脑，在显示质量和多媒体方面表现尤为出色，但并非在所有领域都处于领先地位。

Pros

+ 采用PaperMatte表面处理的OLED显示屏

+ 做工精良，机身纤薄

+ 音质卓越的扬声器

+ 配备Wi-Fi 7、蓝牙6.0和NearLink等现代连接功能

Cons

- 出厂时未预装 Google Play 服务

- 不支持 6 GHz Wi-Fi

- GPU 性能落后于竞争对手

价格与供货情况

华为MatePad Pro Max可直接从华为网店购买。

$172.73
Lenovo Idea Tab - College Tablet - 11″ 2.5K IPS Touchscreen Display - 90Hz - MediaTek Dimensity 6300-4 GB Memory - 128 GB Storage - Integrated Arm Mali-G57 MC2 - Tab Pen and Folio Case
$349.98
TCL NXTPAPER 14 Android Tablet, 14.3" 2.4K Paper-Like Display, 8+256GB
$1,299.99
Microsoft Surface Pro (2026), 13-inch Premium Performance 2-in-1 Laptop, Snapdragon X2 Plus Processor, Touchscreen Display, 16GB RAM, 512GB SSD Storage, Windows 11 Copilot+ PC Built for AI, Dune

华为MatePad Pro Max评测总结
规格：华为 MatePad Pro Max
机身——MatePad Pro Max 极其纤薄
产品特点——随附高速USB接口
软件——Android 16 终于即将面世
通信与GNSS——MatePad Pro Max不支持6 GHz Wi-Fi
相机——呈现自然色彩的光学设备
配件与保修——配件使其成为一台可替代个人电脑的设备
输入设备与操作——电源键中的指纹传感器
显示屏——采用PaperMatte表面处理的OLED屏幕
性能——搭载麒麟T93 Pro处理器的MatePad
排放量——不会过热
电池续航时间——MatePad Pro Max 为 9,760 mAh
Notebookcheck 综合评分
可供参考的替代方案

大屏幕、纤薄机身、强劲性能：华为希望通过MatePad Pro Max，彻底模糊平板电脑与笔记本电脑之间的界限。但如此强大的硬件配置，是否足以在日常使用中真正取代电脑呢？我们对这款XXL平板电脑进行了全面的日常使用测试。

规格：华为 MatePad Pro Max

Huawei MatePad Pro Max (MatePad Pro Series)

Processor

HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro 9c/14t, 1 x 2.8 GHz, 4 x 2.3 GHz, 4 x 1.7 GHz

Graphics adapter

HiSilicon Maleoon 935

Memory

12 GB

, LPDDR5x

Display

13.20 inch 3:2, 3000 x 2000 pixel 273 PPI, Capacitive touchscreen, native pen support, OLED, 10 Bit Color depth, Refresh rate: 30 - 144 Hz, Scratch resistance on Mohs hardness scale: 4; Screen-body-ratio: 91 %, PaperMatte-Surface, glossy: no, HDR, 144 Hz

Storage

512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash, 512 GB

, 483.74 GB free

Connections

1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity, gravity, OTG, NearLink

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 6.0, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 4.7 x 289.34 x 196.34

Battery

37.38 Wh, 9760 mAh Lithium-Ion, High-Silicon-Anode, 3,83 V, two cells, Battery charge time: 50 %: 18 min, 80 %: 24 min, 100 %: 36 min; Battery charge cycles: 1000

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Huawei HarmonyOS

Camera

Primary Camera: 50 MPix (f/1.8, AF) + 0.8 MPix (True-to-Colour Camera); Camera2-API-Level: Limited
Secondary Camera: 12 MPix (f/2.4, FF)

Additional features

Speakers: six, Keyboard: Virtual keyboard, USB Type-C Cable, Polishing cloth, Harmony OS 4.3, 24 Months Warranty, Bluetooth Audio Codecs: SBC, AAC, LHDC, LDAC | GNSS: GPS (L1), Glonass (L1), BeiDou (B1I, B1C, B2b), Galileo (E1, E5a, E5b), QZSS (L1), SBAS | HDR: HLG, HDR10 | DRM Widevine L1 | IP42 | USB Copy Test: 252.88 MB/s (connected to Samsung Portable SSD T7 (USB 3.2 Gen. 2), Supported File Systems for external storages: FAT32, exFAT, NTFS | charging speed: 5 - 100 W (wired)
Biometric security: capacitive fingerprint, 2D facial recognition | Vibration motor: no
6 years security patches (till 05/2032), fanless

Released

05/07/2026

Weight

509 g

Price

1299 Euro

Links

Huawei homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

机身——MatePad Pro Max 极其纤薄

华为MatePad Pro Max的机身厚度仅为4.7毫米，旨在成为同尺寸类别中最薄的平板电脑，这比MagicPad 4还要薄0.1毫米。我们在平板电脑中心位置测得厚度恰好为5毫米，而摄像头周围的厚度则达到7.85毫米。尽管厚度略有增加，但在平坦表面上的晃动依然微乎其微。

MatePad Pro Max 凭借整洁紧密的缝隙和出色的做工给人留下深刻印象。铝制边框也赋予了这款平板电脑高端的外观和质感。它握在手中非常舒适，手感坚固，尽管使用时会产生轻微的吱吱声。

MatePad Pro Max 提供灰色和蓝色两种配色。该设备不具备防尘和防水功能。

尺寸对比

Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Gen 2 Huawei MatePad Pro Max Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 Honor MagicPad 4 DIN A4 ❌

产品特点——随附高速USB接口

华为MatePad Pro Max具备现代化的高端功能组合。在我们连接三星T7便携式固态硬盘进行的复制测试中，USB 3.2端口实现了252 MB/s的高速数据传输速率。该接口还支持有线视频输出，不过仅能镜像显示画面。

与大多数华为平板电脑一样，Pro Max 也支持 NearLink 技术，这是连接可选键盘和手写笔所必需的。

软件——Android 16 终于即将面世

MatePad Pro Max 运行华为的 HarmonyOS 4.3 系统，该系统仍基于开源版 Android 12。据华为博客（Huawei.Blog）的同事透露，EMUI 16 可能会基于 Android 16 开发。若该消息得到证实，我们预计至少所有搭载华为当前旗舰级 SoC 的产品都将获得系统更新，其中就包括 Pro Max。不过，华为尚未对此予以确认。该平板电脑将获得长达六年的安全补丁支持。

与所有华为产品一样，该设备未预装 Google Play 服务。不过，用户仍可通过 Aurora Store 访问 Google Play 商店。该应用可直接从 AppGallery 下载，且设置简便。具体操作方法请参阅本文。

华为预装了相当多的第三方应用，并在系统各处显示了大量应用广告。不过，这些应用均可卸载或禁用。

可持续发展

华为在包装中避免使用明显的塑料材质，尽管包装本身仍用塑料薄膜包裹。该平板电脑的设计不支持用户自行维修。

华为也没有提供有关MatePad Pro Max可持续性的详细信息。

通信与GNSS——MatePad Pro Max不支持6 GHz Wi-Fi

MatePad Pro Max 既不支持蜂窝网络，也不支持 NFC。不过，它提供了几乎完整且现代的连接方案，包括 Wi-Fi 7、蓝牙 6.0 和 NearLink。

遗憾的是，Wi-Fi 不支持 6 GHz 频段。尽管如此，得益于现代通信标准，其传输速率依然很高，虽然稳定性还有待提升。但在日常使用中，这并不会造成任何明显的限制。

Networking
Huawei MatePad Pro Max 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be
iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U	1708 (min: 1412) MBit/s ∼81%
iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U	1758 (min: 1434) MBit/s ∼72%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	971 (min: 476) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	981 (min: 963) MBit/s ∼94%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1842 (min: 908) MBit/s ∼99%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1873 (min: 1645) MBit/s ∼94%
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 Wi-Fi 6E
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	658 (min: 447) MBit/s ∼68%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	607 (min: 509) MBit/s ∼58%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1196 (min: 901) MBit/s ∼64%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	978 (min: 615) MBit/s ∼49%
Honor MagicPad 4 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	938 (min: 717) MBit/s ∼97%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	733 (min: 367) MBit/s ∼70%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1863 (min: 1827) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1133 (min: 564) MBit/s ∼57%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Gen 2 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1345 (min: 1091) MBit/s ∼72%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1993 (min: 1873) MBit/s ∼100%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	956 (min: 595) MBit/s ∼98%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1040 (min: 459) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1289 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼69%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1495 (min: 719) MBit/s ∼75%
iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U	2118 (min: 370) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U	2438 (min: 407) MBit/s ∼100%
Average of class Tablet
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	622 (min: 35.7) MBit/s ∼64%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	744 (min: 40.2) MBit/s ∼72%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1303 (min: 330) MBit/s ∼70%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1500 (min: 291) MBit/s ∼75%
iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U	1717 (min: 370) MBit/s ∼81%
iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U	1805 (min: 407) MBit/s ∼74%

Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1812 (908-1912) MBit/s

Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1868 (1645-1911) MBit/s

Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø955 (476-998) MBit/s

Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø977 (963-989) MBit/s

Huawei MatePad Pro Max 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U; iperf 3.21: Ø1708 (1412-1822) MBit/s

Huawei MatePad Pro Max 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U; iperf 3.21: Ø1758 (1434-1975) MBit/s

华为MatePad Pro Max在户外进行卫星定位时，速度快且准确。然而，在室内环境中，该平板电脑定位较为困难，准确度也会下降。

在一次骑行过程中，我们将该平板电脑与Garmin Venu 2进行了对比。结果显示，Pro Max虽然定位更新频率较低，但仍能提供可靠的轨迹记录。这对于导航任务而言已绰绰有余。

相机——呈现自然色彩的光学设备

就摄影而言，华为MatePad Pro Max上的两颗摄像头固然算不上亮点，但在光线充足的条件下，它们能呈现清晰的图像质量，既能满足记录需求，也能提供令人满意的视频通话体验。

两颗摄像头均可录制最高60帧/秒的超高清视频，但不支持光学防抖。

Image comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Hauptkamera Hauptkamera 5-facher Zoom Low-Light

click to load images

Huawei MatePad Pro Max

Poco F8 Ultra

Oppo Find X9 Ultra

Canon EOS 90D

click to load images

Huawei MatePad Pro Max

Poco F8 Ultra

Oppo Find X9 Ultra

Canon EOS 90D

click to load images

Huawei MatePad Pro Max

Poco F8 Ultra

Oppo Find X9 Ultra

Canon EOS 90D

click to load images

Huawei MatePad Pro Max

Poco F8 Ultra

Oppo Find X9 Ultra

Canon EOS 90D

ColorChecker Huawei MatePad Pro Max: 6.11 ∆E min: 1.86 - max: 9.79 ∆E

配件与保修——配件使其成为一台可替代个人电脑的设备

在德国，1,299 欧元的建议零售价（约合 1507.15 美元）中已包含键盘。包装盒内还附带了一块擦拭布和一条 USB-C 数据线。另有可选的兼容电源适配器、华为 M-Pencil Pro 以及鼠标可供选购。若直接购买平板电脑，华为通常会为前者提供大幅折扣。如果您已经拥有支持蓝牙的鼠标，也可以继续使用。

输入设备与操作——电源键中的指纹传感器

华为 MatePad Pro Max 上的电容式触摸屏具有出色的滑动性能，并能准确识别整个屏幕表面的输入。可选配的 M-Pencil Pro 提供卓越的书写体验和丰富多样的功能，不仅适合记笔记，也适用于创意工作。

华为未配备振动马达。不过，在生物识别安全方面，电源键内置了指纹传感器。同时还支持通过前置摄像头进行人脸识别。

除了指关节手势外，还实现了智能感应功能。这些功能可在您注视屏幕时保持屏幕亮起，并支持非接触式滚动。

键盘不仅设有位置合理的触控笔收纳槽，还提供了出色的打字体验和一个小巧的触控板。遗憾的是，仅支持两种可视角度，且两者视角都相当陡峭。

显示屏——采用PaperMatte表面处理的OLED屏幕

华为MatePad Pro Max的超大显示屏刷新率最高可达144 Hz，峰值亮度最高可达1,600尼特。

在我们的测试中，全屏显示白色图像时，屏幕中央亮度短暂达到 987 cd/m²，但随后迅速降至 908 cd/m²，因此我们以较低的数值作为参考。当白色区域较小的时候，亮度会进一步提升，尽管我们测得的最高值不超过 1,485 cd/m²。

该设备采用 PWM 方式控制亮度，在最低亮度下 PWM 频率高达 1,479 Hz。其基频也相对较高，达到 360 Hz，因此敏感用户不太可能因此感到不适。


907 cd/m²	899 cd/m²	898 cd/m²
901 cd/m²	908 cd/m²	891 cd/m²
898 cd/m²	893 cd/m²	891 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3

Maximum: 908 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 898.4 cd/m² Minimum: 2.68 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 908 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.5 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.7}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 2.6 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.95}
99.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.21
CCT: 6973 K

	Huawei MatePad Pro Max OLED, 3000x2000, 13.2"	Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 2960x1848, 14.6"	Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 Tandem OLED, 2752x2064, 13"	Honor MagicPad 4 OLED, 3000x1920, 12.3"	Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Gen 2 IPS, 3504x2109, 13"
Display		13%		85%	-49%
APL18 Peak Brightness (cd/m²)	1441	1575 9%		2337 62%	751 -48%
HDR Peak Brightness (cd/m²)	1485	1739 17%		3084 108%	738 -50%
Response Times		-187%	-197%	-1030%	-2816%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms)	0.52 ?(0.273, 0.251)	3.51 ?(1.619, 1.889) -575%	3.39 ?(1.606, 1.784) -552%	16.6 ?(0.3615, 16.24) -3092%	22.8 ?(18.2, 4.6) -4285%
Response Time Black / White * (ms)	0.94 ?(0.4695, 0.47)	0.73 ?(0.3655, 0.364) 22%	0.69 ?(0.304, 0.3845) 27%	0.91 ?(0.45, 0.4615) 3%	13.6 ?(9.9, 3.7) -1347%
PWM Frequency (Hz)	360	480	240	60
PWM Amplitude * (%)	15.71	16.95 -8%	25.86 -65%	16.05 -2%
Screen		-15%	20%	20%	-7%
Brightness middle (cd/m²)	908	966 6%	1000 10%	829 -9%	618 -32%
Brightness (cd/m²)	898	965 7%	1010 12%	827 -8%	599 -33%
Brightness Distribution (%)	98	88 -10%	98 0%	90 -8%	92 -6%
Black Level * (cd/m²)					0.5
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.5	2.8 -87%	1 33%	0.9 40%	1.59 -6%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	3.7	4.6 -24%	2.5 32%	1.7 54%	3.79 -2%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.6	2.1 19%	1.7 35%	1.3 50%	1.7 35%
Gamma	2.21 ^100%	2.06 ^107%	2.21 ^100%	2.25 ^98%	2.399 ^92%
CCT	6973 ^93%	6305 ^103%	6661 ^98%	6601 ^98%	6583 ^99%
Contrast (:1)					1236
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-63% / -57%	-89% / -52%	-308% / -255%	-957% / -577%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

360 Hz
Amplitude: 15.71 %
Secondary Frequency: 1479 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 360 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 360 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7680 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

在固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置下的测量数据序列（最低亮度下的振幅曲线看似平坦，但这仅是缩放比例造成的。信息框中显示了最低亮度下振幅曲线的放大图。）

华为平板电脑的色彩还原效果不错。不过，考虑到其高端定位，其色温略显偏冷，可以进行更精确的校准。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
0.94 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.4695 ms rise
0.94 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.47 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (19.7 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
0.52 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.273 ms rise
0.52 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.251 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.13 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (30.8 ms).

MatePad Pro Max 在户外表现出色。哑光 PaperMatte 表面处理效果显著，即使在阳光直射下也能提供极佳的可读性。

显示屏的可视角度稳定性非常出色，仅在狭窄的可视角度下亮度略有下降。

性能——搭载麒麟T93 Pro处理器的MatePad

MatePad Pro Max 标称搭载麒麟 T93 Pro 芯片。据华为向我们确认，这实际上就是麒麟 9030 Pro，即华为目前最强大的芯片组。

虽然这款 SoC 在跑分测试中表现并非特别突出，但在日常使用中性能非常出色，处理多任务时也毫无明显延迟。

Geekbench 6.7
Single-Core
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 Apple M4 10-Core, M4 10-Core GPU, 16384	3715 Points +104%
Honor MagicPad 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, Adreno 829, 12288	2863 Points +57%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288	2798 Points +54%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Gen 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 8192	2135 Points +17%
Huawei MatePad Pro Max HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro, Maleoon 935, 12288	1818 Points
Average of class Tablet (402 - 4128, n=86, last 2 years)	1752 Points -4%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro (1297 - 1818, n=2)	1558 Points -14%
Multi-Core
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 Apple M4 10-Core, M4 10-Core GPU, 16384	14690 Points +126%
Honor MagicPad 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, Adreno 829, 12288	9492 Points +46%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288	9043 Points +39%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Gen 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 8192	6855 Points +5%
Huawei MatePad Pro Max HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro, Maleoon 935, 12288	6504 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro (5234 - 6504, n=2)	5869 Points -10%
Average of class Tablet (1104 - 16544, n=86, last 2 years)	5489 Points -16%

Geekbench 7.0
Single-Core
Huawei MatePad Pro Max HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro, Maleoon 935, 12288	1590 Points
Average of class Tablet (n=1last 2 years)	1590 Points 0%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro (1130 - 1590, n=2)	1360 Points -14%
Multi-Core
Huawei MatePad Pro Max HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro, Maleoon 935, 12288	5853 Points
Average of class Tablet (n=1last 2 years)	5853 Points 0%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro (4546 - 5853, n=2)	5200 Points -11%

PCMark for Android - Work 3.x
Honor MagicPad 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, Adreno 829, 12288	19736 Points +27%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288	17301 Points +12%
Huawei MatePad Pro Max HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro, Maleoon 935, 12288	15508 Points
Average of class Tablet (7084 - 27428, n=58, last 2 years)	14036 Points -9%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro (9983 - 15508, n=2)	12746 Points -18%

Antutu v11 - Score
Honor MagicPad 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, Adreno 829, 12288	3282461 Points +66%
Huawei MatePad Pro Max HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro, Maleoon 935, 12288	1982664 Points
Average of class Tablet (522205 - 4184631, n=11, last 2 years)	1924035 Points -3%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro (1793229 - 1982664, n=2)	1887947 Points -5%

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288	12358 Points +39%
Huawei MatePad Pro Max HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro, Maleoon 935, 12288	8918 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro (7779 - 8918, n=2)	8349 Points -6%
Average of class Tablet (195 - 13333, n=55, last 2 years)	6958 Points -22%
System
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288	16550 Points +26%
Huawei MatePad Pro Max HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro, Maleoon 935, 12288	13095 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro (12753 - 13095, n=2)	12924 Points -1%
Average of class Tablet (904 - 18343, n=55, last 2 years)	10091 Points -23%
Memory
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288	11533 Points +47%
Average of class Tablet (401 - 17963, n=55, last 2 years)	8206 Points +4%
Huawei MatePad Pro Max HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro, Maleoon 935, 12288	7872 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro (7463 - 7872, n=2)	7668 Points -3%
Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288	54675 Points +74%
Huawei MatePad Pro Max HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro, Maleoon 935, 12288	31379 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro (28063 - 31379, n=2)	29721 Points -5%
Average of class Tablet (88 - 62351, n=55, last 2 years)	20133 Points -36%
Web
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288	2225 Points +14%
Huawei MatePad Pro Max HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro, Maleoon 935, 12288	1955 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro (1711 - 1955, n=2)	1833 Points -6%
Average of class Tablet (10 - 2370, n=55, last 2 years)	1657 Points -15%

UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288	73138 Points +399%
Honor MagicPad 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, Adreno 829, 12288	20683 Points +41%
Average of class Tablet (3600 - 76852, n=52, last 2 years)	18949 Points +29%
Huawei MatePad Pro Max HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro, Maleoon 935, 12288	14655 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro (10532 - 14655, n=2)	12594 Points -14%

Geekbench AI
Single Precision NPU 1.7
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288	1164 Points +165%
Average of class Tablet (166 - 5295, n=47, last 2 years)	790 Points +80%
Honor MagicPad 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, Adreno 829, 12288	673 Points +53%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Gen 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 8192	465 Points +6%
Huawei MatePad Pro Max HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro, Maleoon 935, 12288	440 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro (332 - 440, n=2)	386 Points -12%
Half Precision NPU 1.7
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288	9597 Points +2047%
Average of class Tablet (154 - 41155, n=47, last 2 years)	3883 Points +769%
Honor MagicPad 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, Adreno 829, 12288	675 Points +51%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Gen 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 8192	460 Points +3%
Huawei MatePad Pro Max HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro, Maleoon 935, 12288	447 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro (334 - 447, n=2)	391 Points -13%
Quantized NPU 1.7
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288	13099 Points +1201%
Average of class Tablet (88 - 57388, n=47, last 2 years)	5708 Points +467%
Honor MagicPad 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, Adreno 829, 12288	1578 Points +57%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Gen 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 8192	1022 Points +1%
Huawei MatePad Pro Max HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro, Maleoon 935, 12288	1007 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro (741 - 1007, n=2)	874 Points -13%

图形处理由Maleoon 935负责，该芯片现已支持光线追踪技术。这是该平板电脑无法与当前竞争对手抗衡的一个领域。

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 M4 10-Core GPU, M4 10-Core, 1 TB NAND Flash	8889 Points +194%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6601 Points +118%
Honor MagicPad 4 Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	5623 Points +86%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Gen 2 Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4153 Points +37%
Huawei MatePad Pro Max Maleoon 935, Kirin 9030 Pro, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	3028 Points

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 M4 10-Core GPU, M4 10-Core, 1 TB NAND Flash	8689 Points +183%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6589 Points +114%
Honor MagicPad 4 Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	5623 Points +83%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Gen 2 Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4170 Points +36%
Huawei MatePad Pro Max Maleoon 935, Kirin 9030 Pro, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	3072 Points

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 M4 10-Core GPU, M4 10-Core, 1 TB NAND Flash	32525 Points +180%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	23699 Points +104%
Honor MagicPad 4 Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	21183 Points +83%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Gen 2 Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	17732 Points +53%
Huawei MatePad Pro Max Maleoon 935, Kirin 9030 Pro, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	11607 Points

3DMark / Solar Bay Score
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 M4 10-Core GPU, M4 10-Core, 1 TB NAND Flash	14922 Points +278%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	11737 Points +197%
Honor MagicPad 4 Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	9627 Points +144%
Huawei MatePad Pro Max Maleoon 935, Kirin 9030 Pro, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	3952 Points

3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 M4 10-Core GPU, M4 10-Core, 1 TB NAND Flash	15576 Points +297%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	11788 Points +200%
Honor MagicPad 4 Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	9644 Points +146%
Huawei MatePad Pro Max Maleoon 935, Kirin 9030 Pro, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	3925 Points

3DMark / Solar Bay Extreme Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	880 Points +127%
Huawei MatePad Pro Max Maleoon 935, Kirin 9030 Pro, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	387 Points

3DMark / Solar Bay Extreme Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	833 Points +117%
Huawei MatePad Pro Max Maleoon 935, Kirin 9030 Pro, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	384 Points

3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 M4 10-Core GPU, M4 10-Core, 1 TB NAND Flash	3737 Points +299%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	2415 Points +158%
Honor MagicPad 4 Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	2082 Points +122%
Huawei MatePad Pro Max Maleoon 935, Kirin 9030 Pro, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	937 Points

3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 M4 10-Core GPU, M4 10-Core, 1 TB NAND Flash	3583 Points +275%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	2496 Points +161%
Honor MagicPad 4 Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	2093 Points +119%
Huawei MatePad Pro Max Maleoon 935, Kirin 9030 Pro, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	956 Points

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 M4 10-Core GPU, M4 10-Core, 1 TB NAND Flash	120 fps +100%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +100%
Honor MagicPad 4 Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps 0%
Huawei MatePad Pro Max Maleoon 935, Kirin 9030 Pro, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	60 fps

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	853 fps +99%
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 M4 10-Core GPU, M4 10-Core, 1 TB NAND Flash	758.2 fps +77%
Honor MagicPad 4 Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	662 fps +55%
Huawei MatePad Pro Max Maleoon 935, Kirin 9030 Pro, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	428 fps

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 M4 10-Core GPU, M4 10-Core, 1 TB NAND Flash	120 fps +100%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +100%
Honor MagicPad 4 Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps 0%
Huawei MatePad Pro Max Maleoon 935, Kirin 9030 Pro, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	60 fps

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 M4 10-Core GPU, M4 10-Core, 1 TB NAND Flash	530 fps +112%
Honor MagicPad 4 Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	398 fps +59%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	368 fps +47%
Huawei MatePad Pro Max Maleoon 935, Kirin 9030 Pro, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	250 fps

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	118 fps +115%
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 M4 10-Core GPU, M4 10-Core, 1 TB NAND Flash	106.2 fps +93%
Honor MagicPad 4 Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps +9%
Huawei MatePad Pro Max Maleoon 935, Kirin 9030 Pro, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	55 fps

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 M4 10-Core GPU, M4 10-Core, 1 TB NAND Flash	399.5 fps +132%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	310 fps +80%
Honor MagicPad 4 Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	298 fps +73%
Huawei MatePad Pro Max Maleoon 935, Kirin 9030 Pro, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	172 fps

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 M4 10-Core GPU, M4 10-Core, 1 TB NAND Flash	84.1 fps +147%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	83 fps +144%
Honor MagicPad 4 Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	57 fps +68%
Huawei MatePad Pro Max Maleoon 935, Kirin 9030 Pro, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	34 fps

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 M4 10-Core GPU, M4 10-Core, 1 TB NAND Flash	283.9 fps +246%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	171 fps +109%
Honor MagicPad 4 Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	171 fps +109%
Huawei MatePad Pro Max Maleoon 935, Kirin 9030 Pro, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	82 fps

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	77 fps +157%
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 M4 10-Core GPU, M4 10-Core, 1 TB NAND Flash	60 fps +100%
Honor MagicPad 4 Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	58 fps +93%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Gen 2 Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	30 fps 0%
Huawei MatePad Pro Max Maleoon 935, Kirin 9030 Pro, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	30 fps

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 M4 10-Core GPU, M4 10-Core, 1 TB NAND Flash	114.5 fps +134%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	109 fps +122%
Honor MagicPad 4 Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	107 fps +118%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Gen 2 Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	58 fps +18%
Huawei MatePad Pro Max Maleoon 935, Kirin 9030 Pro, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	49 fps

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	108 fps +116%
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 M4 10-Core GPU, M4 10-Core, 1 TB NAND Flash	99.8 fps +100%
Honor MagicPad 4 Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps +20%
Huawei MatePad Pro Max Maleoon 935, Kirin 9030 Pro, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	50 fps
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Gen 2 Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	44 fps -12%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 M4 10-Core GPU, M4 10-Core, 1 TB NAND Flash	339.7 fps +159%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	316 fps +141%
Honor MagicPad 4 Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	226 fps +73%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Gen 2 Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	143 fps +9%
Huawei MatePad Pro Max Maleoon 935, Kirin 9030 Pro, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	131 fps

GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 M4 10-Core GPU, M4 10-Core, 1 TB NAND Flash	55.1 fps +150%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	54 fps +145%
Honor MagicPad 4 Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	44 fps +100%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Gen 2 Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	26 fps +18%
Huawei MatePad Pro Max Maleoon 935, Kirin 9030 Pro, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	22 fps

Jetstream 2 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | WebXPRT 5

Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 (Safari Mobile 17)	333.7 Points +40%
Honor MagicPad 4 (Chrome 148)	322.347 Points +35%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra (Chrome 140)	271.946 Points +14%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Gen 2 (Chrome 147)	245.46 Points +3%
Huawei MatePad Pro Max (Chrome 151)	239.202 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro (n=1)	239 Points 0%
Average of class Tablet (48 - 420, n=55, last 2 years)	172.3 Points -28%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 (Safari Mobile 17)	105178 Points +55%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra (Chrome 140)	94555 Points +39%
Honor MagicPad 4 (Chrome 148)	90273 Points +33%
Huawei MatePad Pro Max (Chrome 151)	67832 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro (48753 - 67832, n=2)	58293 Points -14%
Average of class Tablet (2794 - 138481, n=69, last 2 years)	52535 Points -23%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Tablet (243 - 14670, n=64, last 2 years)	1376 ms * -134%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro (588 - 787, n=2)	687 ms * -17%
Huawei MatePad Pro Max (Chrome 151)	588.1 ms *
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra (Chrome 140)	391 ms * +34%
Honor MagicPad 4 (Chrome 148)	371.2 ms * +37%
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 (Safari Mobile 17)	318.8 ms * +46%

WebXPRT 5 - Overall
Honor MagicPad 4 (Chrome 148)	81 Points +31%
Average of class Tablet (37 - 102, n=6, last 2 years)	64.8 Points +5%
Huawei MatePad Pro Max (Chrome 151)	62 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro (43 - 62, n=2)	52.5 Points -15%

* ... smaller is better

	Huawei MatePad Pro Max	Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra	Honor MagicPad 4	Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Gen 2	Average 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	Average of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5		-42%	-38%	-50%	-27%	-55%
Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s)	4327.68	4076.86 -6%	1978.75 -54%	1912.4 -56%	3608 ?(1440 - 4366, n=49) -17%	2125 ?(126.9 - 4328, n=75, last 2 years) -51%
Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s)	4118.12	2257.93 -45%	1752.63 -57%	1852.7 -55%	3219 ?(339 - 4118, n=49) -22%	1720 ?(99.2 - 4118, n=75, last 2 years) -58%
Random Read 4KB (MB/s)	494.4	384.4 -22%	513.85 4%	347.8 -30%	412 ?(279 - 614, n=49) -17%	280 ?(20.1 - 514, n=75, last 2 years) -43%
Random Write 4KB (MB/s)	1022.64	50.66 -95%	574.85 -44%	438.3 -57%	496 ?(48.2 - 1071, n=49) -51%	336 ?(9.1 - 1023, n=75, last 2 years) -67%

排放量——不会过热

温度

即使在持续负载下，表面温度仍保持在40 °C以下。在大多数压力测试中，该SoC表现稳定，降频现象较少，但其性能仍仅为竞争对手的50%左右。

Max. Load

Idle


35.6 °C	36.7 °C	35.9 °C
35.1 °C	37.8 °C	36.4 °C
34.9 °C	35.5 °C	37.3 °C

Maximum: 37.8 °C
Average: 36.1 °C


37.4 °C	38.1 °C	36.8 °C
38.6 °C	39.8 °C	36.8 °C
36.7 °C	37.3 °C	35.8 °C

Maximum: 39.8 °C
Average: 37.5 °C

Power Supply (max.) 32.9 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.1 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.8 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.8 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.6 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.

3DMark 压力测试

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 M4 10-Core GPU, M4 10-Core, 1 TB NAND Flash	100 % +37%
Honor MagicPad 4 Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	96.3 % +32%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Gen 2 Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	91 % +25%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	81 % +11%
Huawei MatePad Pro Max Maleoon 935, Kirin 9030 Pro, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	72.9 %
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Honor MagicPad 4 Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	94.8 % +21%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Gen 2 Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	91.1 % +16%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	82.5 % +5%
Huawei MatePad Pro Max Maleoon 935, Kirin 9030 Pro, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	78.4 %
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 M4 10-Core GPU, M4 10-Core, 1 TB NAND Flash	66.5 % -15%
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Honor MagicPad 4 Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	99.4 % +1%
Huawei MatePad Pro Max Maleoon 935, Kirin 9030 Pro, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	98.4 %
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Gen 2 Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	88.2 % -10%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	80.9 % -18%
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 M4 10-Core GPU, M4 10-Core, 1 TB NAND Flash	71.3 % -28%
Solar Bay Extreme Stress Test Stability
Huawei MatePad Pro Max Maleoon 935, Kirin 9030 Pro, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	99.8 %
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	92.4 % -7%
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Huawei MatePad Pro Max Maleoon 935, Kirin 9030 Pro, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	98.6 %
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	87.1 % -12%
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 M4 10-Core GPU, M4 10-Core, 1 TB NAND Flash	67.8 % -31%

Huawei MatePad Pro Max Maleoon 935, Kirin 9030 Pro, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.14.3: Ø16.7 (14.9-19) %

Honor MagicPad 4 Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.14.3: Ø32.6 (32.3-34) %

Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.14.1: Ø32 (30.9-37.5) %

Huawei MatePad Pro Max Maleoon 935, Kirin 9030 Pro, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø58.1 (49.9-68.4) %

Honor MagicPad 4 Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø120.2 (119-123.5) %

Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø103.9 (99.2-122.5) %

Huawei MatePad Pro Max Maleoon 935, Kirin 9030 Pro, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.17.4: Ø12.3 (12.2-12.4) %

Honor MagicPad 4 Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.17.4: Ø31.2 (31.1-31.3) %

Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.17.2: Ø33 (31.8-39.3) %

Huawei MatePad Pro Max Maleoon 935, Kirin 9030 Pro, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Solar Bay Extreme Stress Test Stability; 1.0.5.1: Ø2.68 (2.68-2.69) %

Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Extreme Stress Test Stability; 1.0.2.1: Ø5.87 (5.7-6.17) %

Huawei MatePad Pro Max Maleoon 935, Kirin 9030 Pro, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.2: Ø7.02 (6.98-7.07) %

Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.1: Ø16.2 (15.8-18.1) %

发言人

华为MatePad Pro Max内置的六组扬声器不仅音量极大，还能呈现真实的低音效果，并带来令人惊喜的均衡音质。尽管这款平板电脑机身纤薄，但其扬声器性能仍跻身平板电脑扬声器中的顶尖之列。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Huawei MatePad Pro Max audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 20%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 136%

Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 20%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 136%

电池续航时间——MatePad Pro Max 为 9,760 mAh

功耗

华为平板电脑的功耗较低，不过在空闲状态下将屏幕亮度调至最低时，功耗可能会再略微降低一些。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.1 / 0.27 Watt
Idle	2.57 / 4.36 / 4.44 Watt
Load	9.52 / 12.9 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Huawei MatePad Pro Max 9760 mAh	Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra 11600 mAh	Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 10209 mAh	Honor MagicPad 4 10100 mAh	Average HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro	Average of class Tablet
Power Consumption		-28%	-5%	-13%	21%	3%
Idle Minimum * (Watt)	2.57	2.67 -4%	1.94 25%	3.53 -37%	1.55 ?(0.53 - 2.57, n=2) 40%	2.22 ?(0.7 - 6.2, n=66, last 2 years) 14%
Idle Average * (Watt)	4.36	6.31 -45%	5.02 -15%	4.77 -9%	2.95 ?(1.53 - 4.36, n=2) 32%	4.05 ?(1.2 - 9.06, n=66, last 2 years) 7%
Idle Maximum * (Watt)	4.44	6.35 -43%	5.05 -14%	4.86 -9%	3 ?(1.56 - 4.44, n=2) 32%	4.43 ?(1.56 - 12.5, n=66, last 2 years) -0%
Load Average * (Watt)	9.52	12.23 -28%	8.71 9%	11.21 -18%	9.52 ?(n=1) -0%	8.97 ?(3.5 - 34.9, n=57, last 2 years) 6%
Load Maximum * (Watt)	12.9	15.8 -22%	16.93 -31%	11.67 10%	12.9 ?(n=1) -0%	14.5 ?(6.8 - 60.3, n=58, last 2 years) -12%

* ... smaller is better

功耗：Geekbench（150 cd/m²）

Huawei MatePad Pro Max HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø8.02 (2.88-12.9) Watt

Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 Apple M4 10-Core; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø6.82 (2.9-16.9) Watt

Huawei MatePad Pro Max HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø2.92 (2.85-3.05) Watt

Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 Apple M4 10-Core; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø2.68 (2.58-2.79) Watt

功耗：GFXbench（150 cd/m²）

Huawei MatePad Pro Max HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø10.5 (9.75-11.2) Watt

Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 Apple M4 10-Core; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø16.8 (15.8-16.9) Watt

Huawei MatePad Pro Max HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø2.92 (2.85-3.05) Watt

Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 Apple M4 10-Core; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø2.68 (2.58-2.79) Watt

电池续航时间

在我们的对比测试中，MatePad Pro Max 的电池容量最小，续航时间也最短。不过，考虑到其机身尺寸，这一表现依然非常出色。

Battery Runtime


WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 150)		10h 43min

Battery runtime - WiFi v1.3
Huawei MatePad Pro Max 9760 mAh	10.7 h
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra 11600 mAh	13.2 h
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 10209 mAh	12.5 h
Honor MagicPad 4 10100 mAh	13.1 h
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Gen 2 10200 mAh	14.2 h

Notebookcheck 综合评分

华为MatePad Pro Max凭借其出色的PaperMatte OLED显示屏、强大的功能配置以及一流的音频表现而大放异彩，但在性能、软件和电池续航方面却落后于竞争对手。

Back to the verdict

Huawei MatePad Pro Max - 08/28/2026 v8
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis

86 / 98 → 88%

Keyboard

71 / 80 → 89%

Pointing Device

95%

Connectivity

63 / 69 → 91%

Weight

83 / 40-88 → 90%

Battery

89%

Display

94%

Games Performance

37 / 65 → 56%

Application Performance

74 / 92 → 80%

AI Performance

30%

Temperature

91%

Noise

100%

Audio

95 / 91 → 100%

Camera

65 / 90 → 72%

Average

68%

88%

Tablet - Weighted Average

CO2 Emissions
No Data

Materials
25%

Packaging
75%

Power Use
93.7%

Repairability
40%

Software Updates
66.7%

Total Sustainability Score: 50.1%

可供参考的替代方案

Image	Model / Review	Price	Weight	Drive	Display
1. 87.5%	Huawei MatePad Pro Max HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro ⎘ HiSilicon Maleoon 935 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 4.x	Amazon: 1. $172.73 Lenovo Idea Tab - College Ta... 2. $349.98 TCL NXTPAPER 14 Android Tabl... 3. $1,299.99 Microsoft Surface Pro (2026)... List Price: 1299€	509 g	512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	13.20" 3000x2000 273 PPI OLED
2. 89.1%	Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ ⎘ ARM Immortalis-G925 MC12 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 4.x	Amazon: List Price: 1489€	695 g	256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	14.60" 2960x1848 239 PPI Dynamic AMOLED 2X
3. 89.2%	Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 Apple M4 10-Core ⎘ Apple M4 10-core GPU ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB	Amazon: List Price: 2279€	579 g	1 TB NAND Flash	13.00" 2752x2064 265 PPI Tandem OLED
4. 89.6%	Honor MagicPad 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 829 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 4.x	Amazon: 1. $847.00 HONOR MagicPad4 (12.3 Inch, ... 2. $899.00 HONOR MagicPad4 (12.3 Inch, ... 3. $1,020.00 HONOR MagicPad4 (12.3 Inch, ... List Price: 600€	450 g	256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	12.30" 3000x1920 290 PPI OLED
5. 86.5%	Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Gen 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 825 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 128 GB UFS 3.1	Amazon: List Price: 529€	598 g	128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	13.00" 3504x2109 315 PPI IPS

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Add as a preferred source on Google

沙发上的“笔记本杀手”？——华为MatePad Pro Max评测

大。更大。最大。

华为MatePad Pro Max评测总结

Pros

Cons

价格与供货情况

Table of Contents

规格：华为 MatePad Pro Max

机身——MatePad Pro Max 极其纤薄

尺寸对比

产品特点——随附高速USB接口

软件——Android 16 终于即将面世

可持续发展

通信与GNSS——MatePad Pro Max不支持6 GHz Wi-Fi

相机——呈现自然色彩的光学设备

配件与保修——配件使其成为一台可替代个人电脑的设备

输入设备与操作——电源键中的指纹传感器

显示屏——采用PaperMatte表面处理的OLED屏幕

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

性能——搭载麒麟T93 Pro处理器的MatePad

排放量——不会过热

温度

3DMark 压力测试

发言人

Huawei MatePad Pro Max audio analysis

Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra audio analysis

电池续航时间——MatePad Pro Max 为 9,760 mAh

功耗

功耗：Geekbench（150 cd/m²）

功耗：GFXbench（150 cd/m²）

电池续航时间

Notebookcheck 综合评分

可供参考的替代方案

Transparency

More articles related to this device

Related Articles