华为 MatePad 11.5 S (2026) 的评价
华为 MatePad 11.5 S (2026) 是中国制造商推出的一款高品质平板电脑，不到 500 欧元的售价证明它物有所值。这款平板电脑的性能虽然不是最高水平，但对于大多数任务来说绝对够用。此外，该平板电脑还配备了功能强大的扬声器、色彩准确、反应灵敏且无 PWM 闪烁的屏幕以及快速无线局域网。
不过，那些希望获得卫星定位或移动通信等特殊功能的用户会感到失望。此外，华为平板电脑仍然无法使用谷歌服务。现在可以安装这些服务，但并非所有服务都能正常使用。
电池运行时间低于平均水平，华为可能仍需努力优化其 HarmonyOS 操作系统。
这款平板电脑的亮点是磨砂屏幕，使用起来非常舒适，而且成功地防止了反光，这也是 MatePad 11.5 S (2026) 的独特卖点。
如果你想在软件上稍作修整，并且可以不使用谷歌服务，华为将为你提供强有力的支持。
Pros
Cons
价格和供应情况
MatePad 11.5 S (2026) 可直接从制造商或galaxus.de等在线零售商处购买，起价 470 欧元。
- Kepuch Custer Case Compatible for Huawei MatePad 11.5 S 2024, MatePad 11.5" S, MatePad Air 11.5,Ultra-Thin PU-Leather Hard Shell Cover - Green
- GUYAHANYER 2-Pack Screen Protector for Huawei MatePad 11.5 S 2026 Tablet, Tempered Glass flim Anti-Fingerprints Bubble-Free Easy Installation 9H Hardness Case Friendly for MatePad 11.5 S 2026 (11.5")
- Case for Huawei MatePad 11.5 S 2026 11.5-inch Tablet Case 360 Degree Rotation Multi-Viewing Angels PU Leather Stand Folio Cover Camera can be Used Brown
规格
构造和设备：坚固的金属
虽然华为在 2024 的名称中注明了采用哑光显示屏 MatePad 11.5 S PaperMatte，而 MatePad 11.5S (2026) 则只配备了磨砂显示屏。显示屏的对角线尺寸为 11.5 英寸，由绿色或灰色表面的金属外壳包围。
与 2024 版 MatePad 11.5 S 的区别微乎其微。机身看起来仍然非常有质感，显示屏四周边缘纤薄，厚度仅为 6 毫米，非常轻薄。
平板电脑无法徒手扭动。与前代产品不同，MatePad 11.5 S (2026) 还通过了 IP 认证，尽管只有 IP42。
似乎没有内存危机的迹象，因为华为为其平板电脑配备了 12 GB 内存和 256 GB 存储空间。至少在欧洲没有提供其他存储版本。
没有 microSD 读卡器。键盘底座可通过底部的三个插销连接。
USB 3.0 端口在这个价位的平板电脑中并不常见，它还支持 DisplayPort-out 有线显示器连接。
通信和操作：华为平板电脑的快速无线局域网
MatePad 11.5 S (2026) 并没有配备蜂窝模块，但售价却不菲。卫星定位功能也没有配备。
此外，MatePad 11.5 S（2026）也没有接入较少使用的 6 GHz 6E 频段的 Wi-Fi 选项。另一方面，华为安装了一个具有 2x2 MIMO 功能的无线局域网模块，因此可以实现较高的传输速度，这在我们的测试中得到了证实。
亚光触摸屏感觉比普通屏幕粗糙一些，但手感舒适，144 Hz 的刷新率使其使用起来非常流畅。
我们的测试设备还配有一个键盘盖，可以为屏幕设置两种不同的角度。键盘键程为 1.3 毫米，操作起来相当方便。
一个新功能是 MatePad 11.5 S (2026) 现在兼容 M-Pencil Pro，它提供不同的绘画或书写笔尖，同时还支持手势操作。
| Networking | |
| Huawei MatePad 11.5 S (2026) | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Huawei MatePad 11.5 (2025) | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Xiaomi Pad 8 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Lenovo Yoga Tab | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Honor Pad V9 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Average of class Tablet | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
软件和可持续性：谷歌限制
平板电脑预装了 HarmonyOS 4.3。由于美国的制裁，华为不能使用谷歌服务，但如果需要，可以安装谷歌服务。 如果需要，可以安装.
不过，华为现在提供了自己的强大替代方案，甚至希望在未来不使用Android 。
安全补丁的日期为 2025 年 12 月，因此在测试时仍是合理的最新版本。关于软件更新的时间，目前还不太清楚。
该机预装了大量应用程序，因此如果你想拥有一个干净的系统，就必须手动卸载它们。
华为显然不重视可持续发展。包装中仍然使用塑料薄膜，也没有关于制造材料的信息。
相机：不太适合拍照
前置 800 万像素摄像头可用于视频会议或自拍。不过，亮度动态表现不尽如人意，这意味着明亮的背景无法显示任何细节。
后置摄像头为 1300 万像素，更适合光线充足的环境。总的来说，照片颗粒感很强，缺乏细节。
后置摄像头更像是为扫描文件或读取二维码而设计的，而不是拍照。
Image comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main camera: PlantMain camera: EnvironmentMain camera: Low light
显示效果哑光，色彩逼真
MatePad 11.5 S 的 144 Hz IPS 屏幕具有相当高的 2,800 x 1,840 分辨率，配备了特殊的哑光涂层，这在平板电脑中很少见。
由于采用了哑光涂层，图像容易显得苍白，但华为对涂层进行了进一步改进，MatePad 11.5 S（2026）显示的色彩非常鲜艳。同时，根据我们的测量，"正常 "模式下的色彩保真度相当高。
无需担心 PWM 闪烁，但最大亮度略低于同类平板电脑。不过，磨砂涂层可以弥补这一不足，因为在没有反光的情况下，户外的可读性明显提高。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 84 %
Contrast: 895:1 (Black: 0.57 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.63 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.76}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 2.4 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
97.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.228
CCT: 6708 K
| Huawei MatePad 11.5 S (2026) IPS, 2800x1840, 11.5" | Huawei MatePad 11.5 (2025) IPS, 2456x1600, 11.5" | Xiaomi Pad 8 IPS, 3200x2136, 11.2" | Lenovo Yoga Tab LTPS, 3200x2000, 11.1" | Honor Pad V9 IPS, 2800x1840, 11.5" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -29% | 40% | 20% | -173% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 510 | 623 22% | 627 23% | 609 19% | 543 6% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 453 | 578 28% | 613 35% | 583 29% | 501 11% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 84 | 90 7% | 96 14% | 91 8% | 89 6% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.57 | 0.99 -74% | 0.3 47% | 0.4 30% | 0.62 -9% |
| Contrast (:1) | 895 | 629 -30% | 2090 134% | 1523 70% | 876 -2% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.63 | 2.9 -78% | 1.25 23% | 1.81 -11% | 12.4 -661% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.7 | 5.3 -43% | 2.95 20% | 2.98 19% | 15.9 -330% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.4 | 3.9 -63% | 1.8 25% | 2.5 -4% | 12.1 -404% |
| Gamma | 2.228 99% | 2.33 94% | 2.183 101% | 1.934 114% | 0.58 379% |
| CCT | 6708 97% | 7191 90% | 6898 94% | 6853 95% | 6175 105% |
* ... smaller is better
| Display / APL18 Peak Brightness | |
| Huawei MatePad 11.5 S (2026) | |
| Huawei MatePad 11.5 (2025) | |
| Honor Pad V9 | |
| Display / HDR Peak Brightness | |
| Huawei MatePad 11.5 S (2026) | |
| Honor Pad V9 | |
| Huawei MatePad 11.5 (2025) | |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8036 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 14.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 10.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 4.1 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 35 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.1 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 30.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16.3 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 13.9 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 40 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (31.5 ms). | ||
性能、排放和电池寿命：麒麟 T92C 的中等功率
MatePad 11.5 S (2026) 采用了 海思麒麟 T92CSoC 芯片。在 CPU 方面，麒麟 T92C 与前代产品相比仅有微弱的性能提升。
不过，可以看出华为在 GPU 性能上有了相对提升。总体而言，MatePad 11.5 S (2026) 在同价位竞争对手中处于中游水平。
在长时间负载情况下，平板电脑几乎不会发热。压力测试也显示性能没有明显下降。
平板电脑的四个扬声器能产生非常好的强劲音效。不过，蓝牙音频编解码器的选择相当有限。
8,700 毫安时的电池容量在同价位产品中并不算大，这也反映在运行时间上。在 150 尼特条件下的无线局域网测试中，14:35 小时的续航时间足以支撑一天的正常使用，但剩余电量并不多。
至少平板电脑现在可以以最高 40 W 的速度充电，因此充电时间相对较短，最长为 1:30 小时。
| Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total Score | |
| Xiaomi Pad 8 | |
| Huawei MatePad 11.5 (2025) | |
| Average of class Tablet (35.8 - 395, n=67, last 2 years) | |
| Honor Pad V9 | |
| Huawei MatePad 11.5 S (2026) | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin T92C (n=1) | |
| Huawei MatePad 11.5 S (2026) | Huawei MatePad 11.5 (2025) | Xiaomi Pad 8 | Lenovo Yoga Tab | Honor Pad V9 | Average 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | Average of class Tablet | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 23% | 70% | 96% | 12% | -12% | -7% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s) | 1921.5 | 2172.43 13% | 3899.2 103% | 3965.86 106% | 1921.68 0% | 1759 ? -8% | 1924 ? 0% |
| Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s) | 1099.3 | 2011.28 83% | 3391.2 208% | 3363.43 206% | 1767.43 61% | 1203 ? 9% | 1462 ? 33% |
| Random Read 4KB (MB/s) | 321.5 | 278.39 -13% | 325.1 1% | 421.72 31% | 343.96 7% | 287 ? -11% | 258 ? -20% |
| Random Write 4KB (MB/s) | 501.2 | 544.27 9% | 348.2 -31% | 698.11 39% | 396.64 -21% | 320 ? -36% | 299 ? -40% |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.5 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 33.6 °C / 92 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.9 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.8 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
3DMark 压力测试
| 3DMark | |
| Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
| Huawei MatePad 11.5 (2025) | |
| Huawei MatePad 11.5 S (2026) | |
| Honor Pad V9 | |
| Xiaomi Pad 8 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Tab | |
| Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
| Huawei MatePad 11.5 (2025) | |
| Huawei MatePad 11.5 S (2026) | |
| Honor Pad V9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Tab | |
| Xiaomi Pad 8 | |
| Solar Bay Stress Test Stability | |
| Xiaomi Pad 8 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Tab | |
| Honor Pad V9 | |
| Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability | |
| Huawei MatePad 11.5 (2025) | |
| Huawei MatePad 11.5 S (2026) | |
| Xiaomi Pad 8 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Tab | |
| Honor Pad V9 | |
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S (2026) audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 15% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 20%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 9% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Lenovo Yoga Tab audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 19% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 20%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 10% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
| Huawei MatePad 11.5 S (2026) 8700 mAh | Huawei MatePad 11.5 (2025) 10100 mAh | Xiaomi Pad 8 9200 mAh | Lenovo Yoga Tab 8860 mAh | Honor Pad V9 10100 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery runtime | 18% | 23% | 21% | 23% | |
| Reader / Idle (h) | 38.8 | 46.7 20% | |||
| WiFi v1.3 (h) | 14.6 | 17.2 18% | 20.7 42% | 17.7 21% | 17.9 23% |
| Load (h) | 3.9 | 4.2 8% |
Notebookcheck 对华为 MatePad 11.5 S (2026) 的总体印象
华为 MatePad 11.5 S (2026) 是一款功能强大的中端平板电脑，采用磨砂屏幕，联网速度快。不过，它也有一些不足之处，您在购买前应该了解清楚。
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S (2026)
- 02/05/2026 v8
Florian Schmitt
Total Sustainability Score: 潜在竞争对手比较
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Drive | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Huawei MatePad 11.5 S (2026) HiSilicon Kirin T92C ⎘ HiSilicon Maleoon 920A ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB | Amazon: 1. Kepuch Custer Case Compatibl... 2. GUYAHANYER 2-Pack Screen Pro... 3. Case for Huawei MatePad 11.5... List Price: 469€ | 515 g | 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 11.50" 2800x1840 291 PPI IPS | |
2. 81.2%  | Huawei MatePad 11.5 (2025) HiSilicon Kirin T82 ⎘ HiSilicon Maleoon 920c ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB | Amazon: 1. NEOYUKL Cover for Huawei Mat... 2. HUOLUNGJIN Tablets Case Comp... 3. Case Compatible for Huawei M... | 515 g | 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 11.50" 2456x1600 255 PPI IPS |
3. 87.1%  | Xiaomi Pad 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 825 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB | Amazon: 1. XIAOMI Pad 7 Ai WiFi Version... 2. Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Only WiFi... 3. XIAOMI Pad 7 Ai WiFi Version... List Price: 437€ | 485 g | 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash | 11.20" 3200x2136 344 PPI IPS |
4. 88.2%  | Lenovo Yoga Tab Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 750 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB | Amazon: 1. Lenovo - Yoga Tab Plus - 12.... 2. Lenovo Idea Tab Pro with Goo... 3. Lenovo Yoga 11 MTK 8185 4/128 List Price: 499€ | 458 g | 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 11.10" 3200x2000 340 PPI LTPS |
5. 82.2%  | Honor Pad V9 MediaTek Dimensity 8350 ⎘ ARM Mali-G615 MP6 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB | Amazon: 1. Magnetic Detachable Wireless... 2. Case for Honor Pad V9,11.5 i... 3. Case for Honor Pad V9 11.5 i... List Price: 500€ | 475 g | 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 11.50" 2800x1840 291 PPI IPS |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was freely purchased by the author at his/her own expense. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
