Notebookcheck Logo
(Image source: Daniel Schmidt)

采用纳米纹理玻璃显示屏的顶级平板电脑 - 华为 MatePad Pro 13.2 PaperMatte (2025) 评测

优雅的巨人

从外观上看，MatePad Pro 13.2 与前代产品相比几乎没有什么变化，但它现在也使用了成熟的 PaperMatte 显示屏，将反光降到了最低。在测试过程中，我们还发现它的处理器速度更快，但老问题依然存在。
Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Android Touchscreen Tablet

结论--MatePad Pro 需要做出许多妥协

华为 MatePad Pro 13.2（2025）不仅个头大，而且有很多优点：首先，它的显示屏给人留下了深刻印象，刷新率高、亮度大、色彩还原准确。其 PaperMatte 磨砂表面更是锦上添花，与 iPad Pro 的纳米纹理玻璃相比，它不会吸收太多的色彩亮度。此外，华为还提供了一支非常出色的手写笔，甚至还在平板电脑的供货范围内附带了一个键盘。

麒麟 T92 可提供流畅的日常性能，但该设备的 GPU 性能尤其低于该价位的平均水平。此外，它仍然没有谷歌服务和相关应用程序。至少后者可以通过极光商店轻松弥补。最后，该产品仅支持三年的更新，时间确实很短。

Pros

+ 无光泽、精确的 oled 显示屏
+ 长达 3 年的保修期
+ 出色的输入笔（可选）
+ 快速充电
+ 含键盘

Cons

- 只有 3 年的软件更新
- 没有谷歌服务
- GPU 性能较弱
- 电池续航时间一般
- 无 6 GHz 无线局域网

价格和供应情况

截至发稿时，配备 PaperMatte 显示屏的 MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) 尚未在美国上市。

华为 MatePad Pro 13.2（2025）是继去年的 前代同名机型。从外观上看，它除了颜色几乎没有变化，但基本配置现在可以使用更多存储空间和更快的 SoC。此外，它还采用了 PaperMatte 面板，并升级了主摄像头。

华为平板电脑的售价约为 1240 美元，包括 NearLink 键盘。

规格华为 MatePad Pro 13.2 PaperMatte 纸质磨砂屏

Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) (MatePad Pro Series)
Processor
HiSilicon Kirin T92 12 x 1.6 - 2.5 GHz, HiSilicon Main, Mid
Graphics adapter
HiSilicon Maleoon 920
Memory
12 GB 
Display
13.20 inch 3:2, 2880 x 1920 pixel 262 PPI, Capacitive touchscreen, native pen support, Flexible OLED, PaperMatte display, glossy: yes, HDR, 144 Hz
Storage
512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 512 GB 
, 478.82 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Accelerometer, Gyro, Compass, Gravitiy, Hall, OTG, NearLink
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.2, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 5.5 x 289.1 x 196.1
Battery
38.89 Wh, 5050 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 7.7 V, two cells
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Huawei HarmonyOS
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (f/1.8, AF) + 8 MPix (Ultra Wide, f/2.2, FF); Camera2 API Level: Limited
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix (f/2.0, FF)
Additional features
Speakers: six, Keyboard: OnScreen, USB-C cable, HarmonyOS 4.3, 24 Months Warranty, Bluetooth audio codecs: SBC, AAC, LDAC, L2HC | GNSS: GPS (L1), Glonass (L1), BeiDou (B1, B1c), Galileo (E1, E5b), SBAS | HDR: HLG, HDR10 | DRM Widevine L1 | USB Copy Test: 255.11 MB/s (Samsung Portable SSD T7 (USB 3.2 Gen. 2)), Supported File Systems for external storages: FAT32, exFAT, NTFS | max. charging speed: 100 W (wired), fanless
Weight
580 g
Price
1199 Euro
Links
Huawei homepage
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

外壳 - 没有 IP 认证的时尚平板电脑

尽管显示屏尺寸很大，华为 MatePad Pro 13.2 的厚度仅为 5.5 毫米，而且出奇地轻。这款平板电脑的屏占比高达 92%，屏幕边框也特别窄。

其全面的制造质量令人印象深刻：所有缝隙都精确均匀，即使扭动设备也很稳定，不会出现吱吱作响或变形。

不过，这款华为平板电脑还没有获得防水防尘的官方 IP 认证。在测试所在地德国，这款平板电脑只有金色可选。

(图片来源：丹尼尔-施密特）
(图片来源：丹尼尔-施密特）
(图片来源：丹尼尔-施密特）
(图片来源：丹尼尔-施密特）
(图片来源：丹尼尔-施密特）
(图片来源：丹尼尔-施密特）
(图片来源：丹尼尔-施密特）
(图片来源：丹尼尔-施密特）
(图片来源：丹尼尔-施密特）

尺寸比较

❌
326.4 mm 208.6 mm 5.4 mm 718 g290.9 mm 188.3 mm 6.69 mm 640 g289.1 mm 196.1 mm 5.5 mm 580 g281.6 mm 215.5 mm 5.1 mm 579 g274.5 mm 180.5 mm 5.8 mm 555 g297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

连接性 - 配备 USB 3.2 和 NearLink 的华为平板电脑

华为 MatePad Pro 13.2 PaperMatte 配备了一个 USB 3.2 端口（Gen 1）。 三星 PSSD T7.它支持有线图像输出，但只能镜像屏幕，没有桌面模式。

用户不能扩展平板电脑的存储空间，但可以使用蓝牙 5.2 和近距离无线连接。

软件 - MatePad Pro 仍未预装谷歌服务

华为 MatePad Pro 13.2（2025）使用基于 OpenAndroid 12 的 HarmonyOS 4.3。与往年一样，由于美国的贸易限制，华为平板电脑再次不得不取消预装谷歌服务和 Play Store。如果您觉得华为自带的 AppGallery 中的应用程序还不够多，那么您可以使用极光商店访问 Play Store 的全部程序库。安装非常简单，我们在本文的 在本文中因此您可以避免安装来自不安全第三方来源的应用程序。

可持续性

华为没有为其平板电脑提供可持续发展报告，其他相关信息也非常笼统。虽然 MatePad Pro 13.2 包装在一个纸箱中，但它是用塑料收缩包装的。

包装内没有用户维修所需的说明书或备件；平板电脑必须送修。华为预计该平板电脑的更新周期至少为三年。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 无 6 千兆赫高速 Wi-Fi 6

华为 MatePad Pro 13.2（2025）没有蜂窝网络选项，也不支持 6 GHz Wi-Fi。不过，它的无线局域网与我们的参考路由器华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 结合使用时，显示出了快速、稳定的传输性能。

Networking
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1018 (min: 1003) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
968 (min: 908) MBit/s ∼99%
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024
Wi-Fi 6E
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
658 (min: 447) MBit/s ∼65%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
607 (min: 509) MBit/s ∼62%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1196 (min: 901) MBit/s ∼63%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
978 (min: 615) MBit/s ∼53%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
990 (min: 496) MBit/s ∼97%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
979 (min: 909) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1888 (min: 1860) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1842 (min: 940) MBit/s ∼100%
Honor MagicPad 2
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
867 (min: 453) MBit/s ∼85%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
937 (min: 892) MBit/s ∼96%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1598 (min: 1108) MBit/s ∼85%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
960 (min: 700) MBit/s ∼52%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
851 (min: 305) MBit/s ∼84%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
824 (min: 234) MBit/s ∼84%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1218 (min: 417) MBit/s ∼65%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1222 (min: 743) MBit/s ∼66%
Average of class Tablet
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
554 (min: 10.5) MBit/s ∼54%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
555 (min: 20.1) MBit/s ∼57%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1253 (min: 578) MBit/s ∼66%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1402 (min: 746) MBit/s ∼76%
0501001502002503003504004505005506006507007508008509009501000105011001150120012501300Tooltip
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1196 (901-1327)
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø977 (615-1142)
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1018 (1003-1033)
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø658 (447-820)
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø965 (908-1005)
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø606 (509-661)

华为 MatePad Pro 13.2 PaperMatte 的定位服务非常快速和精确。

我们在一次短途步行中将其定位性能与 Garmin Venu 2 进行了比较。虽然平板电脑的定位精度不如运动手表，但其性能仍足以胜任导航任务。

全球导航卫星系统测试：路线
全球导航卫星系统测试：路线
全球导航卫星系统测试：绕池塘旅行
全球导航卫星系统测试：绕池塘旅行
全球导航卫星系统测试：摘要
全球导航卫星系统测试：摘要

摄像头 - 配备 50 万像素镜头的 MatePad Pro 13.2

华为 MatePad Pro 13.2 上的自拍照
华为 MatePad Pro 13.2 上的自拍照

名义上，平板电脑的前置摄像头没有变化，但 dToF 传感器已从其数据表中消失，而其光圈仍然存在。华为对其色彩平衡进行了修改，现在看起来更暖了。

华为手机的一大创新是配备了 5000 万像素分辨率的新主摄像头，并继续辅以超广角镜头。虽然白平衡也显得非常偏暖，但对于平板电脑来说，该摄像头的图像质量还是非常不错的，在光线充足的条件下拍摄文件绰绰有余。

前置摄像头可以录制全高清（30fps）视频，后置摄像头可以录制超高清（30fps，或者：1,080p，60fps）视频。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main cameraMain cameraUltra-wide angle5x zoomLow-light
ColorChecker
3.5 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
5 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
2.2 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
1.2 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
ColorChecker Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025): 6.31 ∆E min: 1.19 - max: 10.43 ∆E
ColorChecker
29.6 ∆E
53.5 ∆E
39.4 ∆E
34.8 ∆E
45.2 ∆E
60.3 ∆E
52.5 ∆E
35.6 ∆E
43.1 ∆E
28.4 ∆E
63.5 ∆E
61.8 ∆E
29.8 ∆E
47.1 ∆E
37.3 ∆E
73.6 ∆E
44.1 ∆E
41.9 ∆E
81 ∆E
69.8 ∆E
52 ∆E
36.9 ∆E
24.4 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025): 45.82 ∆E min: 13.91 - max: 80.98 ∆E

配件和保修 - 延长保修期的华为平板电脑

华为 MatePad Pro 13.2 PaperMatte 随附一条 USB 线缆（Type-A 转 Type-C）和智能磁性键盘。还可选配触控笔和配套的 100 瓦电源适配器。

在本次测试的德国，该产品的保修期为 24 个月，并可选择延长至 36 个月。

输入设备和操作 - 配备面部识别和指纹传感器的平板电脑

MatePad Pr 13.2（2025）的电容式触摸屏各方面都很精确，手感也不错，很顺滑。可选配 M-Pencil 触控笔，它采用近接技术（NearLink），延迟低，可区分多达 10,000 个压力级别。它可以通过磁力吸附在平板电脑的上长边，安全地固定在那里并直接充电。

华为平板电脑的电源按钮上装有一个电容式指纹扫描仪，可提供生物识别安全保护，并可立即解锁。此外，还可以通过前置摄像头使用安全性较低的面部识别功能。

MatePad Pro 13.2 没有振动电机。智能磁性键盘似乎与前代产品相同，并通过 NearLink 与平板电脑通信。17 x 17 毫米的按键触感柔和、安静，只有空格键和回车键的声音稍大。宽大的触摸板尺寸为 120 x 72 毫米，手感顺滑，支持手势操作。

显示屏 - PaperMatte 纸张哑光技术让您一目了然

子像素阵列
子像素阵列

华为 MatePad Pro 13.2（2025）的 13.2 英寸（33.5 厘米）OLED 显示屏与其前代产品几乎完全相同。它的刷新率高达 144 Hz，亮度据称高达 1,000 cd/m²。

说到亮度，我们在 HDR 播放时测得的峰值为 831 cd/m²。它的峰值亮度很有可能是为 HDR Vivid 或描绘较小的白色区域而保留的。

在 60 Hz 的较低基频下，面板显示出典型的 OLED 闪烁。为了保护用户的眼睛，华为还采用了高频 PWM 调光技术。

792
cd/m²		801
cd/m²		797
cd/m²
793
cd/m²		795
cd/m²		797
cd/m²
775
cd/m²		784
cd/m²		782
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 801 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 790.7 cd/m² Minimum: 2.42 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 795 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.86
ΔE Greyscale 2.1 | 0.09-98 Ø5.1
99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.23
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)
Flexible OLED, 2880x1920, 13.2"		Apple iPad Pro 13 2024
Tandem OLED, 2752x2064, 13"		Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
AMOLED 2X, 2960x1848, 14.6"		Honor MagicPad 2
OLED, 3000x1920, 12.3"		Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
IPS, 2944x1840, 12.7"
Screen
14%
-46%
-2%
-77%
Brightness middle
795
1000
26%
605
-24%
645
-19%
726
-9%
Brightness
791
1010
28%
603
-24%
650
-18%
691
-13%
Brightness Distribution
97
98
1%
98
1%
94
-3%
91
-6%
Black Level *
0.55
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.1
1
9%
2.6
-136%
1.3
-18%
4.67
-325%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
2.5
2.5
-0%
5.4
-116%
2.1
16%
5.6
-124%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.1
1.7
19%
1.6
24%
1.5
29%
1.8
14%
Gamma
2.23 99%
2.21 100%
2.08 106%
2.25 98%
2.249 98%
CCT
6822 95%
6661 98%
6405 101%
6658 98%
6382 102%
Contrast
1320

* ... smaller is better

Display: APL18 Peak Brightness | HDR Peak Brightness
Display / APL18 Peak Brightness
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)
Maleoon 920, Kirin T92, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
809 cd/m²
Display / HDR Peak Brightness
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)
Maleoon 920, Kirin T92, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
831 cd/m²

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 60 Hz
Amplitude: 15.63 %
Secondary Frequency: 1250 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 60 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 60 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8426 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

最低显示亮度
分钟
25 % 显示屏亮度
25 %
显示屏亮度为 50
50 %
75 % 显示亮度
75 %
最大手动显示亮度
100 %

固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置下的测量系列（最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来很平，但这是缩放造成的。信息框显示的是最小亮度下的振幅放大图）。

MatePad Pro 13.2 PaperMatte 的色彩描绘非常自然，足以满足专业要求。

灰度（配置文件：正常，白平衡：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
灰度（配置文件：正常，白平衡：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩（配置文件：正常，白平衡：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩（配置文件：正常，白平衡：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩空间（配置文件：正常，白平衡：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩空间（配置文件：正常，白平衡：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
饱和度（配置文件：正常，白平衡：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
饱和度（配置文件：正常，白平衡：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
0.87 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.445 ms rise
↘ 0.4205 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.6 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.16 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.4685 ms rise
↘ 0.6955 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.3 ms).

由于采用了 PaperMatte 磨砂表面，华为平板电脑在户外表现出色。没有恼人的反光，只有在阳光直射的情况下，我们才希望亮度储备再高一些。

它的视角稳定性非常好，只有在非常平的视角下才能看到轻微的绿色光泽。

户外活动
户外活动
视角稳定性
视角稳定性

性能 - 华为平板电脑的极速麒麟 T92

麒麟 T92 麒麟 T92在性能方面取得了令人惊讶的巨大飞跃，可以赶上 骁龙 8s Gen 3的多核 CPU 性能。不过，在系统基准测试中，它明显落后于其他顶级平板电脑，但总体而言，在日常使用中仍能提供流畅的系统性能。

Geekbench 6.4 | Antutu v10 | PCMark for Android | CrossMark | BaseMark OS II | UL Procyon AI Inference for Android | Geekbench AI | AI Benchmark
Geekbench 6.4
Single-Core
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024
Apple M4 (10 cores), M4 10-Core GPU, 16384
3715 Points +136%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
2213 Points +41%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
2192 Points +39%
Honor MagicPad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1986 Points +26%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)
HiSilicon Kirin T92, Maleoon 920, 12288
1574 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin T92
  (n=1)
1574 Points 0%
Average of class Tablet
  (185 - 3715, n=87, last 2 years)
1197 Points -24%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 12288
1174 Points -25%
Multi-Core
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024
Apple M4 (10 cores), M4 10-Core GPU, 16384
14690 Points +185%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
7327 Points +42%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
6723 Points +30%
Honor MagicPad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
5166 Points 0%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)
HiSilicon Kirin T92, Maleoon 920, 12288
5159 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin T92
  (n=1)
5159 Points 0%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 12288
4088 Points -21%
Average of class Tablet
  (493 - 14690, n=87, last 2 years)
3844 Points -25%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024
Apple M4 (10 cores), M4 10-Core GPU, 16384
2716980 Points +150%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
2033124 Points +87%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1891925 Points +74%
Honor MagicPad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1432569 Points +32%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)
HiSilicon Kirin T92, Maleoon 920, 12288
1087402 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin T92
  (n=1)
1087402 Points 0%
Average of class Tablet
  (164396 - 2716980, n=52, last 2 years)
877394 Points -19%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 12288
Points -100%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
17967 Points +14%
Honor MagicPad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
17329 Points +10%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
16743 Points +6%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)
HiSilicon Kirin T92, Maleoon 920, 12288
15804 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin T92
  (n=1)
15804 Points 0%
Average of class Tablet
  (3195 - 25683, n=77, last 2 years)
10752 Points -32%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 12288
10620 Points -33%
CrossMark - Overall
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024
Apple M4 (10 cores), M4 10-Core GPU, 16384
1944 Points +73%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1431 Points +27%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
1367 Points +22%
Honor MagicPad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1155 Points +3%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)
HiSilicon Kirin T92, Maleoon 920, 12288
1125 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin T92
  (n=1)
1125 Points 0%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 12288
834 Points -26%
Average of class Tablet
  (172 - 1944, n=65, last 2 years)
825 Points -27%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
11721 Points +46%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
10498 Points +30%
Honor MagicPad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
9147 Points +14%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)
HiSilicon Kirin T92, Maleoon 920, 12288
8050 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin T92
  (n=1)
8050 Points 0%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 12288
5821 Points -28%
Average of class Tablet
  (195 - 11721, n=62, last 2 years)
4653 Points -42%
System
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
16435 Points +34%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
14858 Points +21%
Honor MagicPad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
13141 Points +7%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)
HiSilicon Kirin T92, Maleoon 920, 12288
12284 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin T92
  (n=1)
12284 Points 0%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 12288
10428 Points -15%
Average of class Tablet
  (904 - 16435, n=62, last 2 years)
7702 Points -37%
Memory
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
11834 Points +38%
Honor MagicPad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
10977 Points +28%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
10000 Points +16%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)
HiSilicon Kirin T92, Maleoon 920, 12288
8600 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin T92
  (n=1)
8600 Points 0%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 12288
8069 Points -6%
Average of class Tablet
  (401 - 12938, n=62, last 2 years)
5409 Points -37%
Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
56004 Points +173%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
33602 Points +64%
Honor MagicPad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
25642 Points +25%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)
HiSilicon Kirin T92, Maleoon 920, 12288
20520 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin T92
  (n=1)
20520 Points 0%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 12288
10876 Points -47%
Average of class Tablet
  (418 - 57192, n=62, last 2 years)
10818 Points -47%
Web
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
2056 Points +6%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
2051 Points +6%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)
HiSilicon Kirin T92, Maleoon 920, 12288
1937 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin T92
  (n=1)
1937 Points 0%
Honor MagicPad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1893 Points -2%
Average of class Tablet
  (10 - 2056, n=62, last 2 years)
1336 Points -31%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 12288
1255 Points -35%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
74437 Points +483%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
17975 Points +41%
Honor MagicPad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
13900 Points +9%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)
HiSilicon Kirin T92, Maleoon 920, 12288
12773 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin T92
  (n=1)
12773 Points 0%
Average of class Tablet
  (2597 - 74821, n=61, last 2 years)
12008 Points -6%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 12288
10874 Points -15%
Geekbench AI
Single Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
480 Points +19%
Average of class Tablet
  (85 - 1140, n=11, last 2 years)
412 Points +2%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)
HiSilicon Kirin T92, Maleoon 920, 12288
402 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin T92
  (n=1)
402 Points 0%
Half Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2
Average of class Tablet
  (84 - 4545, n=11, last 2 years)
1009 Points +150%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
480 Points +19%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)
HiSilicon Kirin T92, Maleoon 920, 12288
404 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin T92
  (n=1)
404 Points 0%
Quantized TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2
Average of class Tablet
  (130 - 4532, n=11, last 2 years)
1241 Points +49%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1108 Points +33%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)
HiSilicon Kirin T92, Maleoon 920, 12288
831 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin T92
  (n=1)
831 Points 0%
AI Benchmark
Score V5
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
8305 Points +8392%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
3377 Points +3353%
Average of class Tablet
  (97.8 - 8305, n=7, last 2 years)
1944 Points +1888%
Honor MagicPad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
120 Points +23%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)
HiSilicon Kirin T92, Maleoon 920, 12288
97.8 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin T92
  (n=1)
97.8 Points 0%
Score V6
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
7341 Points
Average of class Tablet
  (99.7 - 7341, n=10, last 2 years)
1774 Points

马利龙 马龙 920的图形性能比 马龙 910但仍落后于竞争对手。它也不支持光线追踪。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Wild Life Score | Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | Steel Nomad Light Score
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash
8889 Points +406%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5527 Points +215%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4514 Points +157%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3218 Points +83%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)
Maleoon 920, Kirin T92, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1757 Points
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1030 Points -41%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash
8689 Points +384%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5356 Points +198%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4742 Points +164%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3301 Points +84%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)
Maleoon 920, Kirin T92, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1796 Points
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1051 Points -41%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash
32525 Points +353%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
18628 Points +160%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
12985 Points +81%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)
Maleoon 920, Kirin T92, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7178 Points
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3785 Points -47%
3DMark / Wild Life Score
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)
Maleoon 920, Kirin T92, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7134 Points
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3941 Points -45%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points -100%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash
3737 Points +581%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1917 Points +249%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1071 Points +95%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
935 Points +70%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)
Maleoon 920, Kirin T92, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
549 Points
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash
3583 Points +557%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1920 Points +252%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1090 Points +100%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
948 Points +74%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)
Maleoon 920, Kirin T92, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
545 Points
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +100%
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash
120 fps +100%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps 0%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps 0%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps 0%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)
Maleoon 920, Kirin T92, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
809 fps +118%
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash
758.2 fps +104%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
520 fps +40%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
498 fps +34%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)
Maleoon 920, Kirin T92, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
371 fps
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
270 fps -27%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +103%
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash
120 fps +103%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps +2%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps +2%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)
Maleoon 920, Kirin T92, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
59 fps
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
53 fps -10%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash
530 fps +155%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
325 fps +56%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
265 fps +27%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
260 fps +25%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)
Maleoon 920, Kirin T92, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
208 fps
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
127 fps -39%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
115 fps +117%
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash
106.2 fps +100%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps +13%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
59 fps +11%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)
Maleoon 920, Kirin T92, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
53 fps
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
33 fps -38%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash
399.5 fps +181%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
240 fps +69%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
231 fps +63%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
200 fps +41%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)
Maleoon 920, Kirin T92, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
142 fps
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
101 fps -29%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash
84.1 fps +190%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
76 fps +162%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
59 fps +103%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
42 fps +45%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)
Maleoon 920, Kirin T92, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
29 fps
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
17 fps -41%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash
283.9 fps +344%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
153 fps +139%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
137 fps +114%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
110 fps +72%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)
Maleoon 920, Kirin T92, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
64 fps
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
42 fps -34%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
65 fps +183%
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash
60 fps +161%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
54 fps +135%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
35 fps +52%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)
Maleoon 920, Kirin T92, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
23 fps
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
14 fps -39%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash
114.5 fps +227%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
89 fps +154%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
67 fps +91%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
55 fps +57%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)
Maleoon 920, Kirin T92, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
35 fps
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
21 fps -40%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash
99.8 fps +170%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
93 fps +151%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps +62%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
53 fps +43%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)
Maleoon 920, Kirin T92, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
37 fps
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
23 fps -38%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash
339.7 fps +261%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
209 fps +122%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
167 fps +78%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
144 fps +53%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)
Maleoon 920, Kirin T92, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
94 fps
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
58 fps -38%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash
55.1 fps +267%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
43 fps +187%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
30 fps +100%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
24 fps +60%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)
Maleoon 920, Kirin T92, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
15 fps
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8.8 fps -41%
Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | Speedometer 3.0 | WebXPRT 4 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total Score
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 (Safari Mobile 17)
333.7 Points +85%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus (Chrome 132)
231.7 Points +28%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra (Chrome 130)
183.971 Points +2%
Average HiSilicon Kirin T92 (n=1)
180.7 Points 0%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) (Chrome 134)
180.698 Points
Honor MagicPad 2 (Chrome 128.0.6613.146)
134.356 Points -26%
Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 393, n=73, last 2 years)
128.1 Points -29%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (Edge 120)
91.258 Points -49%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 (Safari Mobile 17)
572 runs/min +113%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus (Chrome 132)
294 runs/min +9%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) (Chrome 134)
269 runs/min
Average HiSilicon Kirin T92 (n=1)
269 runs/min 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra (Chrome 130)
264 runs/min -2%
Honor MagicPad 2 (Chrome 128.0.6613.146)
197 runs/min -27%
Average of class Tablet (2.59 - 572, n=66, last 2 years)
154.9 runs/min -42%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (Edge 120)
67.9 runs/min -75%
Speedometer 3.0 - Score
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 (Safari Mobile 17)
32 runs/min +95%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus (Chrome 132)
17.2 runs/min +5%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) (Chrome 134)
16.4 runs/min
Average HiSilicon Kirin T92 (n=1)
16.4 runs/min 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra (Chrome 130)
14.8 runs/min -10%
Average of class Tablet (1.25 - 34.4, n=43, last 2 years)
13.7 runs/min -16%
Honor MagicPad 2 (Chrome 128.0.6613.146)
11.9 runs/min -27%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 (Safari Mobile 17)
315 Points +82%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra (Chrome 130)
193 Points +12%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) (Chrome 134)
173 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin T92 (n=1)
173 Points 0%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus (Chrome 132)
164 Points -5%
Honor MagicPad 2 (Chrome 128.0.6613.146)
155 Points -10%
Average of class Tablet (21 - 315, n=72, last 2 years)
118.1 Points -32%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (Edge 120)
99 Points -43%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 (Safari Mobile 17)
105178 Points +87%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra (Chrome 130)
71054 Points +27%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus (Chrome 132)
70252 Points +25%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) (Chrome 134)
56134 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin T92 (n=1)
56134 Points 0%
Honor MagicPad 2 (Chrome 128.0.6613.146)
42032 Points -25%
Average of class Tablet (763 - 111219, n=95, last 2 years)
34743 Points -38%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (Edge 120)
33982 Points -39%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=81, last 2 years)
3306 ms * -428%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (Edge 120)
1202.4 ms * -92%
Honor MagicPad 2 (Chrome 128.0.6613.146)
842.2 ms * -35%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra (Chrome 130)
632.4 ms * -1%
Average HiSilicon Kirin T92 (n=1)
626 ms * -0%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) (Chrome 134)
625.7 ms *
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus (Chrome 132)
579.9 ms * +7%
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 (Safari Mobile 17)
318.8 ms * +49%

* ... smaller is better

Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 UltraHonor MagicPad 2Lenovo Yoga Tab PlusHuawei MatePad Pro 13.2Average 512 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5
58%
5%
38%
15%
-15%
-41%
Sequential Read 256KB
1864.54
3912.45
110%
2025.54
9%
3868
107%
2022.97
8%
1852 ?(1023 - 2023, n=29)
-1%
1253 ?(126.9 - 3984, n=78, last 2 years)
-33%
Sequential Write 256KB
1441.8
2963.58
106%
2003.53
39%
3047.6
111%
1875.6
30%
1227 ?(575 - 1876, n=29)
-15%
882 ?(78.2 - 3484, n=78, last 2 years)
-39%
Random Read 4KB
305.89
342.97
12%
298.27
-2%
241.2
-21%
386.3
26%
286 ?(208 - 386, n=29)
-7%
206 ?(18.4 - 474, n=78, last 2 years)
-33%
Random Write 4KB
533.47
554.76
4%
401.95
-25%
290.9
-45%
502.59
-6%
348 ?(221 - 533, n=29)
-35%
212 ?(8.23 - 668, n=78, last 2 years)
-60%

Games

051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025); Dead Trigger 2: Ø60 (59-60)
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025); PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø59.9 (58-60)
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025); PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø59.4 (54-60)
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025); PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD: Ø39.7 (34-41)
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025); World of Tanks Blitz: Ø59.9 (59-60)

排放 - 配备六个扬声器的 MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)

温度

华为 MatePad Pro 13.2（2025）的表面温度即使在负载情况下也很低，在我们的测试中仅有部分超过 40 度大关。

其 SoC 也同样表现平平，在任何情况下都能充分发挥性能。

Max. Load
 34.5 °C40 °C40.3 °C 
 31.4 °C33.7 °C35 °C 
 30.3 °C31.8 °C32.9 °C 
Maximum: 40.3 °C
Average: 34.4 °C
37.4 °C39.6 °C34.5 °C
34.3 °C34 °C32.2 °C
32 °C33.4 °C31.7 °C
Maximum: 39.6 °C
Average: 34.3 °C
Power Supply (max.)  34.6 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.4 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.3 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.6 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.1 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.

3DMark stress tests

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
99.7 % 0%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)
Maleoon 920, Kirin T92, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.4 %
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.1 % 0%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
73.6 % -26%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
72.4 % -27%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)
Maleoon 920, Kirin T92, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.8 %
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.3 % -1%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
89.3 % -11%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
81.8 % -18%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
71.6 % -28%
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)
Maleoon 920, Kirin T92, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
98.2 %
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
95.9 % -2%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
86.6 % -12%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
80.7 % -18%
0510152025303540455055606570Tooltip
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) Maleoon 920, Kirin T92, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø10.7 (10.7-10.8)
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test: Ø37.5 (34.3-51.6)
Honor MagicPad 2 Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø18.1 (17.6-19.7)
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) Maleoon 920, Kirin T92, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø43 (42.9-43.2)
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø60 (60-60)
Honor MagicPad 2 Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø64.5 (53.4-72.6)
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) Maleoon 920, Kirin T92, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø4.08 (4.04-4.12)
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability: Ø20.4 (18.9-27.8)
Honor MagicPad 2 Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.0.15: Ø7.85 (7.73-8.06)

发言人

这款超薄平板电脑共有六个驱动单元，能产生不错的音效，虽然缺乏真正的低音，但中音还是有的。

该设备的蓝牙编解码器选择相当有限，LC3 和 Auracast 也不可用。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2038.2412532.532.53121.927.54031.429.95033.530.86321.733.8802442.610017.853.512516.661.116019.767.12001967.125017.567.931516.26840016.568.550012.374.163012.378.68001578.7100013.277.2125012.472.6160011.680200013.379.625001278315012.774.7400012.974.8500013.373.463001373.4800013.172.81000013.570.61250013.672.51600013.462.4SPL25.488.4N0.780.3median 13.3median 73.4Delta1.7533.244.431.841.218.23623.433.332.437.119.429.618.839.817.653.913.862.715.967.5166516.466.615.169.913.871.312.977.113.878.513.576.713.17613.874.312.576.41372.713.271.414.567.713.464.71465.915.270.91569.513.664.41760.115.555.42685.30.767.1median 13.8median 69.514.3hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHuawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)Apple iPad Pro 13 2024
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 5.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.9% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

电池续航时间 - MatePad Pro 13.2 PaperMatte 配备两节电池

耗电量

与前代机型相比，它的功耗有所改善，但仍然相当高，尤其是在显示屏亮度最低的情况下。

如果使用华为提供的合适充电器，华为 MatePad Pro 13.2 的充电功率可达 100 瓦。制造商声称可以在 40 分钟内将电池充至 80%；在我们的测试中，实际上只用了 38 分钟。然后在 66 分钟后完全充满，最后的 100% 电量只用了 7 分钟。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.63 / 0.39 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 3.74 / 4.24 / 4.34 Watt
Load midlight 6.94 / 11.8 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)
5050 mAh		Apple iPad Pro 13 2024
10209 mAh		Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
11200 mAh		Honor MagicPad 2
10050 mAh		Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
10200 mAh		Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
5050 mAh		Average HiSilicon Kirin T92
 		Average of class Tablet
 
Power Consumption
-11%
-29%
-30%
10%
-46%
0%
4%
Idle Minimum *
3.74
1.94
48%
3.34
11%
3.6
4%
1.5
60%
3.58
4%
3.74 ?(n=1)
-0%
1.762 ?(0.63 - 4.66, n=73, last 2 years)
53%
Idle Average *
4.24
5.02
-18%
5
-18%
6.52
-54%
1.8
58%
7.67
-81%
4.24 ?(n=1)
-0%
3.74 ?(1 - 9.2, n=73, last 2 years)
12%
Idle Maximum *
4.34
5.05
-16%
5.11
-18%
6.54
-51%
2.3
47%
7.77
-79%
4.34 ?(n=1)
-0%
4.22 ?(1.3 - 15.3, n=73, last 2 years)
3%
Load Average *
6.94
8.71
-26%
12.77
-84%
10.63
-53%
11.1
-60%
11.86
-71%
6.94 ?(n=1)
-0%
9.46 ?(2.5 - 34.9, n=73, last 2 years)
-36%
Load Maximum *
11.8
16.93
-43%
15.94
-35%
11.57
2%
18.5
-57%
11.88
-1%
11.8 ?(n=1)
-0%
13.3 ?(4.6 - 46.7, n=73, last 2 years)
-13%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

01234567891011Tooltip
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) HiSilicon Kirin T92; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø8.65 (3.42-11.8)
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 HiSilicon Kirin 9000W; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø8.19 (3.43-11.9)
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) HiSilicon Kirin T92; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø3.53 (3.41-3.88)
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 HiSilicon Kirin 9000W; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø4.15 (4.04-4.66)

Power consumption: GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910Tooltip
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) HiSilicon Kirin T92; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø10.1 (9.57-11)
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 HiSilicon Kirin 9000W; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø8.22 (7.46-9.69)
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) HiSilicon Kirin T92; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø3.53 (3.41-3.88)
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 HiSilicon Kirin 9000W; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø4.15 (4.04-4.66)

运行时间

它的电池续航时间还算不错，而竞争对手及其前代产品则做得更好。

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 134)
9h 12min
Battery Runtime - WiFi v1.3
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)
5050 mAh
552 min
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024
10209 mAh
752 min
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
11200 mAh
585 min
Honor MagicPad 2
10050 mAh
606 min
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
10200 mAh
768 min
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
5050 mAh
647 min

Notebookcheck 总评分

华为 MatePad Pro 13.2（2025）的 PaperMatte 显示屏、出色的扬声器和漂亮的输入设备给人留下了深刻印象。虽然可以弥补谷歌应用程序的不足，但这并不像预装了谷歌服务的设备那样方便。

Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) - 05/07/2025 v8
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis
86 / 98 → 88%
Keyboard
71 / 80 → 89%
Pointing Device
97%
Connectivity
58 / 69 → 83%
Weight
82 / 40-88 → 87%
Battery
86%
Display
93%
Games Performance
31 / 65 → 48%
Application Performance
69 / 92 → 75%
AI Performance
21%
Temperature
91%
Noise
100%
Audio
90 / 91 → 99%
Camera
61 / 90 → 67%
Average
63%
85%
Tablet - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
25%
Packaging
50%
Power Use
85.1%
Repairability
40%
Software Updates
50%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 41.7%

可能的替代品比较

Benchmark Comparison Plugin: ERROR, Layout "57" not supported!

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 采用纳米纹理玻璃显示屏的顶级平板电脑 - 华为 MatePad Pro 13.2 PaperMatte (2025) 评测
Daniel Schmidt, 2025-05- 9 (Update: 2025-05- 9)