结论--MatePad Pro 需要做出许多妥协
华为 MatePad Pro 13.2(2025)不仅个头大,而且有很多优点:首先,它的显示屏给人留下了深刻印象,刷新率高、亮度大、色彩还原准确。其 PaperMatte 磨砂表面更是锦上添花,与 iPad Pro 的纳米纹理玻璃相比,它不会吸收太多的色彩亮度。此外,华为还提供了一支非常出色的手写笔,甚至还在平板电脑的供货范围内附带了一个键盘。
麒麟 T92 可提供流畅的日常性能,但该设备的 GPU 性能尤其低于该价位的平均水平。此外,它仍然没有谷歌服务和相关应用程序。至少后者可以通过极光商店轻松弥补。最后,该产品仅支持三年的更新,时间确实很短。
Pros
Cons
价格和供应情况
截至发稿时,配备 PaperMatte 显示屏的 MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) 尚未在美国上市。
Table of Contents
- 结论--MatePad Pro 需要做出许多妥协
- 规格华为 MatePad Pro 13.2 PaperMatte 纸质磨砂屏
- 外壳 - 没有 IP 认证的时尚平板电脑
- 连接性 - 配备 USB 3.2 和 NearLink 的华为平板电脑
- 软件 - MatePad Pro 仍未预装谷歌服务
- 通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 无 6 千兆赫高速 Wi-Fi 6
- 摄像头 - 配备 50 万像素镜头的 MatePad Pro 13.2
- 配件和保修 - 延长保修期的华为平板电脑
- 输入设备和操作 - 配备面部识别和指纹传感器的平板电脑
- 显示屏 - PaperMatte 纸张哑光技术让您一目了然
- 性能 - 华为平板电脑的极速麒麟 T92
- 排放 - 配备六个扬声器的 MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)
- 电池续航时间 - MatePad Pro 13.2 PaperMatte 配备两节电池
- Notebookcheck 总评分
- 可能的替代品比较
华为 MatePad Pro 13.2(2025)是继去年的 前代同名机型。从外观上看,它除了颜色几乎没有变化,但基本配置现在可以使用更多存储空间和更快的 SoC。此外,它还采用了 PaperMatte 面板,并升级了主摄像头。
华为平板电脑的售价约为 1240 美元,包括 NearLink 键盘。
规格华为 MatePad Pro 13.2 PaperMatte 纸质磨砂屏
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
外壳 - 没有 IP 认证的时尚平板电脑
尽管显示屏尺寸很大,华为 MatePad Pro 13.2 的厚度仅为 5.5 毫米,而且出奇地轻。这款平板电脑的屏占比高达 92%,屏幕边框也特别窄。
其全面的制造质量令人印象深刻:所有缝隙都精确均匀,即使扭动设备也很稳定,不会出现吱吱作响或变形。
不过,这款华为平板电脑还没有获得防水防尘的官方 IP 认证。在测试所在地德国,这款平板电脑只有金色可选。
连接性 - 配备 USB 3.2 和 NearLink 的华为平板电脑
华为 MatePad Pro 13.2 PaperMatte 配备了一个 USB 3.2 端口(Gen 1)。 三星 PSSD T7.它支持有线图像输出,但只能镜像屏幕,没有桌面模式。
用户不能扩展平板电脑的存储空间,但可以使用蓝牙 5.2 和近距离无线连接。
软件 - MatePad Pro 仍未预装谷歌服务
华为 MatePad Pro 13.2(2025)使用基于 OpenAndroid 12 的 HarmonyOS 4.3。与往年一样,由于美国的贸易限制,华为平板电脑再次不得不取消预装谷歌服务和 Play Store。如果您觉得华为自带的 AppGallery 中的应用程序还不够多,那么您可以使用极光商店访问 Play Store 的全部程序库。安装非常简单,我们在本文的 在本文中因此您可以避免安装来自不安全第三方来源的应用程序。
可持续性
华为没有为其平板电脑提供可持续发展报告,其他相关信息也非常笼统。虽然 MatePad Pro 13.2 包装在一个纸箱中,但它是用塑料收缩包装的。
包装内没有用户维修所需的说明书或备件;平板电脑必须送修。华为预计该平板电脑的更新周期至少为三年。
通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 无 6 千兆赫高速 Wi-Fi 6
华为 MatePad Pro 13.2(2025)没有蜂窝网络选项,也不支持 6 GHz Wi-Fi。不过,它的无线局域网与我们的参考路由器华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 结合使用时,显示出了快速、稳定的传输性能。
Networking | |
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Honor MagicPad 2 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Average of class Tablet | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
华为 MatePad Pro 13.2 PaperMatte 的定位服务非常快速和精确。
我们在一次短途步行中将其定位性能与 Garmin Venu 2 进行了比较。虽然平板电脑的定位精度不如运动手表,但其性能仍足以胜任导航任务。
摄像头 - 配备 50 万像素镜头的 MatePad Pro 13.2
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main cameraMain cameraUltra-wide angle5x zoomLow-light

配件和保修 - 延长保修期的华为平板电脑
华为 MatePad Pro 13.2 PaperMatte 随附一条 USB 线缆(Type-A 转 Type-C)和智能磁性键盘。还可选配触控笔和配套的 100 瓦电源适配器。
在本次测试的德国,该产品的保修期为 24 个月,并可选择延长至 36 个月。
输入设备和操作 - 配备面部识别和指纹传感器的平板电脑
MatePad Pr 13.2(2025)的电容式触摸屏各方面都很精确,手感也不错,很顺滑。可选配 M-Pencil 触控笔,它采用近接技术(NearLink),延迟低,可区分多达 10,000 个压力级别。它可以通过磁力吸附在平板电脑的上长边,安全地固定在那里并直接充电。
华为平板电脑的电源按钮上装有一个电容式指纹扫描仪,可提供生物识别安全保护,并可立即解锁。此外,还可以通过前置摄像头使用安全性较低的面部识别功能。
MatePad Pro 13.2 没有振动电机。智能磁性键盘似乎与前代产品相同,并通过 NearLink 与平板电脑通信。17 x 17 毫米的按键触感柔和、安静,只有空格键和回车键的声音稍大。宽大的触摸板尺寸为 120 x 72 毫米,手感顺滑,支持手势操作。
显示屏 - PaperMatte 纸张哑光技术让您一目了然
|
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 795 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.86
ΔE Greyscale 2.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.1
99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.23
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) Flexible OLED, 2880x1920, 13.2" | Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 Tandem OLED, 2752x2064, 13" | Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra AMOLED 2X, 2960x1848, 14.6" | Honor MagicPad 2 OLED, 3000x1920, 12.3" | Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus IPS, 2944x1840, 12.7" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | 14% | -46% | -2% | -77% | |
Brightness middle | 795 | 1000 26% | 605 -24% | 645 -19% | 726 -9% |
Brightness | 791 | 1010 28% | 603 -24% | 650 -18% | 691 -13% |
Brightness Distribution | 97 | 98 1% | 98 1% | 94 -3% | 91 -6% |
Black Level * | 0.55 | ||||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.1 | 1 9% | 2.6 -136% | 1.3 -18% | 4.67 -325% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.5 | 2.5 -0% | 5.4 -116% | 2.1 16% | 5.6 -124% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.1 | 1.7 19% | 1.6 24% | 1.5 29% | 1.8 14% |
Gamma | 2.23 99% | 2.21 100% | 2.08 106% | 2.25 98% | 2.249 98% |
CCT | 6822 95% | 6661 98% | 6405 101% | 6658 98% | 6382 102% |
Contrast | 1320 |
* ... smaller is better
Display / APL18 Peak Brightness | |
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) |
Display / HDR Peak Brightness | |
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 60 Hz Amplitude: 15.63 % Secondary Frequency: 1250 Hz | ||
The display backlight flickers at 60 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 60 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8455 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置下的测量系列(最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来很平,但这是缩放造成的。信息框显示的是最小亮度下的振幅放大图)。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
0.87 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.445 ms rise | |
↘ 0.4205 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.7 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
1.16 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.4685 ms rise | |
↘ 0.6955 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.4 ms). |
性能 - 华为平板电脑的极速麒麟 T92
麒麟 T92 麒麟 T92在性能方面取得了令人惊讶的巨大飞跃,可以赶上 骁龙 8s Gen 3的多核 CPU 性能。不过,在系统基准测试中,它明显落后于其他顶级平板电脑,但总体而言,在日常使用中仍能提供流畅的系统性能。
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra | |
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus | |
Honor MagicPad 2 | |
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) | |
Average HiSilicon Kirin T92 (n=1) | |
Average of class Tablet (2597 - 74821, n=60, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 |
Geekbench AI | |
Single Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2 | |
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus | |
Average of class Tablet (85 - 1140, n=10, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) | |
Average HiSilicon Kirin T92 (n=1) | |
Half Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2 | |
Average of class Tablet (84 - 4545, n=10, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus | |
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) | |
Average HiSilicon Kirin T92 (n=1) | |
Quantized TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2 | |
Average of class Tablet (130 - 4532, n=10, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus | |
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) | |
Average HiSilicon Kirin T92 (n=1) |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | |
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra | |
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus | |
Honor MagicPad 2 | |
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) | |
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 |
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme | |
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra | |
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus | |
Honor MagicPad 2 | |
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) | |
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 |
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score | |
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra | |
Honor MagicPad 2 | |
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) | |
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 |
3DMark / Wild Life Score | |
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) | |
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 | |
Honor MagicPad 2 |
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | |
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra | |
Honor MagicPad 2 | |
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus | |
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) |
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score | |
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra | |
Honor MagicPad 2 | |
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus | |
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra | |
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 | |
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 | |
Honor MagicPad 2 | |
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus | |
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra | |
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 | |
Honor MagicPad 2 | |
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus | |
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) | |
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 |
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra | |
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 | |
Honor MagicPad 2 | |
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus | |
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) | |
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 |
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen | |
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 | |
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus | |
Honor MagicPad 2 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra | |
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) | |
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 |
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra | |
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 | |
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus | |
Honor MagicPad 2 | |
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) | |
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 |
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen | |
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 | |
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra | |
Honor MagicPad 2 | |
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) | |
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 |
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen | |
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra | |
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus | |
Honor MagicPad 2 | |
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) | |
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 |
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen | |
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra | |
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus | |
Honor MagicPad 2 | |
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) | |
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra | |
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 | |
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus | |
Honor MagicPad 2 | |
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) | |
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra | |
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus | |
Honor MagicPad 2 | |
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) | |
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | |
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra | |
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus | |
Honor MagicPad 2 | |
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) | |
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | |
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra | |
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus | |
Honor MagicPad 2 | |
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) | |
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 |
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra | |
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus | |
Honor MagicPad 2 | |
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) | |
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 |
Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total Score | |
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 (Safari Mobile 17) | |
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus (Chrome 132) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra (Chrome 130) | |
Average HiSilicon Kirin T92 (n=1) | |
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) (Chrome 134) | |
Honor MagicPad 2 (Chrome 128.0.6613.146) | |
Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 393, n=72, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (Edge 120) |
Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 (Safari Mobile 17) | |
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus (Chrome 132) | |
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) (Chrome 134) | |
Average HiSilicon Kirin T92 (n=1) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra (Chrome 130) | |
Honor MagicPad 2 (Chrome 128.0.6613.146) | |
Average of class Tablet (2.59 - 572, n=65, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (Edge 120) |
Speedometer 3.0 - Score | |
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 (Safari Mobile 17) | |
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus (Chrome 132) | |
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) (Chrome 134) | |
Average HiSilicon Kirin T92 (n=1) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra (Chrome 130) | |
Average of class Tablet (1.25 - 34.4, n=42, last 2 years) | |
Honor MagicPad 2 (Chrome 128.0.6613.146) |
WebXPRT 4 - Overall | |
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 (Safari Mobile 17) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra (Chrome 130) | |
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) (Chrome 134) | |
Average HiSilicon Kirin T92 (n=1) | |
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus (Chrome 132) | |
Honor MagicPad 2 (Chrome 128.0.6613.146) | |
Average of class Tablet (21 - 315, n=71, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (Edge 120) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 (Safari Mobile 17) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra (Chrome 130) | |
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus (Chrome 132) | |
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) (Chrome 134) | |
Average HiSilicon Kirin T92 (n=1) | |
Honor MagicPad 2 (Chrome 128.0.6613.146) | |
Average of class Tablet (763 - 111219, n=94, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (Edge 120) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=80, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (Edge 120) | |
Honor MagicPad 2 (Chrome 128.0.6613.146) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra (Chrome 130) | |
Average HiSilicon Kirin T92 (n=1) | |
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) (Chrome 134) | |
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus (Chrome 132) | |
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 (Safari Mobile 17) |
* ... smaller is better
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) | Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra | Honor MagicPad 2 | Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus | Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 | Average 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | Average of class Tablet | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | 58% | 5% | 38% | 15% | -15% | -41% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 1864.54 | 3912.45 110% | 2025.54 9% | 3868 107% | 2022.97 8% | 1852 ? -1% | 1255 ? -33% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 1441.8 | 2963.58 106% | 2003.53 39% | 3047.6 111% | 1875.6 30% | 1227 ? -15% | 890 ? -38% |
Random Read 4KB | 305.89 | 342.97 12% | 298.27 -2% | 241.2 -21% | 386.3 26% | 286 ? -7% | 206 ? -33% |
Random Write 4KB | 533.47 | 554.76 4% | 401.95 -25% | 290.9 -45% | 502.59 -6% | 348 ? -35% | 214 ? -60% |
Games
排放 - 配备六个扬声器的 MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)
温度
华为 MatePad Pro 13.2(2025)的表面温度即使在负载情况下也很低,在我们的测试中仅有部分超过 40 度大关。
其 SoC 也同样表现平平,在任何情况下都能充分发挥性能。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.3 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.6 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.1 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
3DMark stress tests
3DMark | |
Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus | |
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) | |
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 | |
Honor MagicPad 2 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra | |
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) | |
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 | |
Honor MagicPad 2 | |
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra | |
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability | |
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) | |
Honor MagicPad 2 | |
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra |
发言人
这款超薄平板电脑共有六个驱动单元,能产生不错的音效,虽然缺乏真正的低音,但中音还是有的。
该设备的蓝牙编解码器选择相当有限,LC3 和 Auracast 也不可用。
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 5.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.9% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
电池续航时间 - MatePad Pro 13.2 PaperMatte 配备两节电池
耗电量
与前代机型相比,它的功耗有所改善,但仍然相当高,尤其是在显示屏亮度最低的情况下。
如果使用华为提供的合适充电器,华为 MatePad Pro 13.2 的充电功率可达 100 瓦。制造商声称可以在 40 分钟内将电池充至 80%;在我们的测试中,实际上只用了 38 分钟。然后在 66 分钟后完全充满,最后的 100% 电量只用了 7 分钟。
Off / Standby | ![]() ![]() |
Idle | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Load |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Key:
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) 5050 mAh | Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 10209 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra 11200 mAh | Honor MagicPad 2 10050 mAh | Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus 10200 mAh | Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 5050 mAh | Average HiSilicon Kirin T92 | Average of class Tablet | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -11% | -29% | -30% | 10% | -46% | 0% | 3% | |
Idle Minimum * | 3.74 | 1.94 48% | 3.34 11% | 3.6 4% | 1.5 60% | 3.58 4% | 3.74 ? -0% | 1.766 ? 53% |
Idle Average * | 4.24 | 5.02 -18% | 5 -18% | 6.52 -54% | 1.8 58% | 7.67 -81% | 4.24 ? -0% | 3.76 ? 11% |
Idle Maximum * | 4.34 | 5.05 -16% | 5.11 -18% | 6.54 -51% | 2.3 47% | 7.77 -79% | 4.34 ? -0% | 4.25 ? 2% |
Load Average * | 6.94 | 8.71 -26% | 12.77 -84% | 10.63 -53% | 11.1 -60% | 11.86 -71% | 6.94 ? -0% | 9.51 ? -37% |
Load Maximum * | 11.8 | 16.93 -43% | 15.94 -35% | 11.57 2% | 18.5 -57% | 11.88 -1% | 11.8 ? -0% | 13.3 ? -13% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)
Power consumption: GFXbench (150 cd/m²)
运行时间
它的电池续航时间还算不错,而竞争对手及其前代产品则做得更好。
Notebookcheck 总评分
华为 MatePad Pro 13.2(2025)的 PaperMatte 显示屏、出色的扬声器和漂亮的输入设备给人留下了深刻印象。虽然可以弥补谷歌应用程序的不足,但这并不像预装了谷歌服务的设备那样方便。
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)
- 05/07/2025 v8
Daniel Schmidt
可能的替代品比较
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.