Notebookcheck Logo

LG Ultra PC 16 (2022) AMD评论。这不是一个克。

比克更有耐力。 它被称为Ultra PC,价格比克便宜。这款16英寸的笔记本电脑的电池寿命比基于英特尔的LG gram已经很长了。更重要的是,该设备只需要一个72瓦特的电池(而不是80瓦特)就能达到这样的电池寿命水平。Ultra PC的重量为400克,诚然不完全是 "克",但它仍然是一个值得尊敬的硬件。
AMD Ryzen (Zen) Windows
LG Ultra PC 16"(2022):比克16的电池更小--但电池寿命更长,重量更大
LG Ultra PC 16"(2022):比克16的电池更小--但电池寿命更长,重量更大

LG的gram笔记本电脑轻巧、安静、超便携。它们有14、16或17英寸的屏幕(不再有15英寸的型号),并带有一个高端价格标签。不是每个人都能负担得起或愿意购买价格超过1,500欧元(1,480美元)的笔记本电脑。
那么,一个精简的LG gram怎么样呢?嗯,它被称为Ultra PC--一款重量略高于克的笔记本电脑(1.6公斤而不是1.19公斤),并配备了AMD的CPU。那么,16英寸的设备是否一定是劣质的选择?在检查了LG Ultra PC 16英寸的配置后,我们认为对所有人来说都不是这样的。 Ryzen 3 5300U,8GB内存和512GB固态硬盘存储。价格略低于900欧元(887美元),我们的审查单位是该阵容中最小和最便宜的模型。

更多LG笔记本电脑评论。

LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G (Ultra-PC Series)
Processor
AMD Ryzen 3 5300U 4 x 2.6 - 3.8 GHz, 30 W PL2 / Short Burst, 25 W PL1 / Sustained, Lucienne-U (Zen 2)
Graphics adapter
AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
Memory
8 GB 
, Dual channel, LPDDR4X-4266, soldered, no free slot
Display
16.00 inch 16:10, 1280 x 1200 pixel 110 PPI, LG Display LP160WU1-SPH1, IPS, glossy: no, 60 Hz
Mainboard
AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH
Storage
Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU, 512 GB 
, M.2 22x60, 420 GB free
Soundcard
AMD Raven/Renoir/Van Gogh/Cezanne/Rembrandt/Raphael - HD Audio Controller
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: Combo, Card Reader: microSD, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor
Networking
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.1
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 16.3 x 356.3 x 248.6
Battery
72 Wh Lithium-Ion, Battery runtime (according to manufacturer): 22.5 h
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 11 Home
Camera
Webcam: 720p
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: no, 65 Watt PSU, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
1.599 kg, Power Supply: 401 g
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
83.8 %
10/2022
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
R3 5300U, Vega 6
1.6 kg16.3 mm16.00"1280x1200
86.4 %
10/2021
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
1.7 kg15.9 mm16.10"1920x1080
86.3 %
09/2021
LG Gram 16 (2021)
i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
1.2 kg16.8 mm16.00"2560x1600
84.7 %
07/2022
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F
R7 5700U, Vega 8
1.6 kg18 mm15.60"1920x1080
83.5 %
08/2021
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05
R5 5500U, Vega 7
1.7 kg19.1 mm15.60"1920x1080
82.2 %
04/2022
Honor MagicBook 16 2022
R5 5600H, Vega 7
1.8 kg18.2 mm16.10"1920x1080

外壳 - Ultra PC的重量为400克

那么,克和Ultra PC在哪些方面有所不同?而且,尽管这两款设备的外观非常相似,但为什么Ultra PC的重量却明显增加了呢?Ultra PC的机身是由塑料制成的,而不是镁合金。该设备还使用标准的72Wh电池,而不是能量密度更高的轻型电池。因此,这两款笔记本电脑的电池尺寸相同,但重量不同。

坚硬的镁合金在克重上能够应对只有初级的内部加固。但这也意味着机箱有一些弯曲。相比之下,Ultra PC更结实。它的塑料底座需要强大的垂直和水平加固。因此,我们的评测单元上的显示屏和底座部分的弯曲度都比克拉克上的同类产品要小。稍微扭动显示屏就会在屏幕的下边缘造成明显的背光渗漏。背光出血甚至在某种程度上发生在显示器被移动时。

这两款设备的显示屏铰链的连接方式也不同。Ultra PC在中间有一个明显的铰链,而gram则有一个隐藏的铰链,消失在笔记本电脑的机身后面。两台笔记本电脑的屏幕都可以向后倾斜140度。虽然可以用一只手稍微打开盖子,但你必须握住底座才能进一步向后移动。

LG Ultra PC 16 (2022): 较重的标准电池,典型的塑料底盘
LG Ultra PC 16 (2022): 较重的标准电池,典型的塑料底盘
LG gram 16(2021年):更轻的电池,镁质底盘
LG gram 16(2021年):更轻的电池,镁质底盘
强化装置增加了坚固性...
强化装置增加了坚固性...
...在掌托下。
...在掌托下。
塑料底盖
塑料底盖
 
LG Ultra PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
LG Ultra PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
1,599 g (3.53 lb)
在外观上与LG gram 16有明显的相似之处
无背光键盘
LG Ultra PC 16
聪明。螺钉保留在底盖中,所以你不会丢失它们。
底部

Ultra PC的重量正好是1,600克(3.53磅)--比16年的克重多出400克(0.88磅)。如前所述,这是由于笔记本电脑的标准电池和塑料机身造成的。从外观上看,Ultra PC在宽度、深度和高度上都比gram稍大一些。但请记住,我们在这里讨论的是不到一毫米的差异。

正如 宏碁Swift 3 SF316-51,一些竞争对手也可以相当苗条。宏碁笔记本电脑的厚度只有15.9毫米(0.63英寸),但重量却多出100克(0.22磅)。在1.6公斤(3.53磅)的时候, 戴尔Inspiron 15 5515与Ultra PC的重量相同。然而,它明显更厚,有18毫米(0.71英寸),而不是16.3毫米(0.64英寸)。简而言之:在重量和厚度方面,Ultra PC能够与相同价格范围内的其他设备竞争。

尺寸比较

368 mm 236 mm 18.2 mm 1.8 kg367.8 mm 236.1 mm 15.9 mm 1.7 kg356.67 mm 233.13 mm 19.1 mm 1.7 kg356 mm 229 mm 18 mm 1.6 kg355.9 mm 243.4 mm 16.8 mm 1.2 kg356.3 mm 248.6 mm 16.3 mm 1.6 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

特点 - 带有快速Wi-Fi的Windows笔记本电脑

电源按钮中的指纹识别器
电源按钮中的指纹识别器

LG为这款16英寸设备配备了两个USB-A端口(USB 3.1 Gen2)和一个USB-C端口(PD,DisplayPort 15瓦)。你可以通过USB-C端口为笔记本电脑供电(用45瓦和65瓦的充电器测试)。为了避免占用充电的端口,制造商提供了一个65瓦的电源适配器,带有一个小小的桶状插头。

笔记本电脑可以连接到最多两个外部显示器(通过HDMI和DisplayPort)。与基于英特尔的gram 16一样,Ultra PC不支持Thunderbolt 4,这意味着它最多只能与USB-C 3.1坞站兼容。电源可以通过扩展坞输送给笔记本电脑,只要它支持65瓦的电源直通。左边和右边的端口位于笔记本电脑的背面,使掌托旁边的区域没有电缆。

MicroSD读卡器,2个USB 3.1 Gen2 Type-A,Kensington插槽
MicroSD读卡器,2个USB 3.1 Gen2 Type-A,Kensington插槽
充电接口、HDMI、带显示端口的USB 3.1 Gen1 Type-C(15瓦)、音频插孔
充电接口、HDMI、带显示端口的USB 3.1 Gen1 Type-C(15瓦)、音频插孔

SD卡阅读器

SD卡读卡器的性能相当一般。它能够以大约75MB/s的速度传输照片,这与基于英特尔的克16上看到的性能水平非常相似。这个价格范围内的许多笔记本电脑的SD读卡器的连接速度较慢,如我们比较的联想和戴尔。

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Intel Core i7-1165G7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB)
78.6 MB/s +6%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
AMD Ryzen 3 5300U
74.5 MB/s
Average of class Office
  (8 - 196.8, n=49, last 2 years)
55.8 MB/s -25%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
28.2 MB/s -62%
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)
26.2 MB/s -65%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Intel Core i7-1165G7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB)
90.5 MB/s +6%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
AMD Ryzen 3 5300U
85.5 MB/s
Average of class Office
  (25 - 173.2, n=43, last 2 years)
65.6 MB/s -23%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
36.5 MB/s -57%
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)
36.2 MB/s -58%

连接性

Ultra PC中的英特尔Wi-Fi 6 AX200模块支持802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax标准并提供蓝牙5.1功能。在最佳条件下(周围没有其他Wi-Fi设备,笔记本电脑和服务器之间距离较短),该模块产生的结果低于规格中的速度。然而,由于上传和下载速度分别为1300和1500Mbits/s,Ultra PC完全不必在竞争中退缩。Wi-Fi模块与沿边框的两根天线相连。

英特尔AX200 Wi-Fi模块在M.2插槽中,与两根天线相连。
英特尔AX200 Wi-Fi模块在M.2插槽中,与两根天线相连。
Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1510 (1265min - 1555max) MBit/s
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
  (832 - 1722, n=17)
1383 MBit/s -8%
Average of class Office
  (104.2 - 1752, n=86, last 2 years)
1241 MBit/s -18%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1309 (1167min - 1378max) MBit/s
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
  (694 - 1629, n=17)
1257 MBit/s -4%
Average of class Office
  (47.8 - 1793, n=84, last 2 years)
1108 MBit/s -15%
iperf3 receive AX12
Honor MagicBook 16 2022
Qualcomm WCN685x
1371 (1262min - 1420max) MBit/s
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1314 (1233min - 1359max) MBit/s
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
  (523 - 1684, n=128)
1191 MBit/s
Average of class Office
  (721 - 1690, n=4, last 2 years)
1067 MBit/s
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
664 (646min - 684max) MBit/s
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05
RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852AE
621 (506min - 708max) MBit/s
iperf3 transmit AX12
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1126 (552min - 1223max) MBit/s
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
  (447 - 1645, n=127)
1104 MBit/s
Honor MagicBook 16 2022
Qualcomm WCN685x
1094 (553min - 1190max) MBit/s
Average of class Office
  (819 - 1332, n=4, last 2 years)
990 MBit/s
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
932 (463min - 990max) MBit/s
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05
RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852AE
890 (431min - 988max) MBit/s
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950100010501100115012001250130013501400145015001550Tooltip
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1309 (1167-1378)
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1509 (1265-1555)
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1314 (1233-1359)
Honor MagicBook 16 2022 Qualcomm WCN685x; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1370 (1262-1420)
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1108 (552-1223)
Honor MagicBook 16 2022 Qualcomm WCN685x; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1075 (553-1190)

网络摄像头

网络摄像头(0.9MP)的最大分辨率为1,280 x 720。它缺乏色彩准确度,正如21的高平均Delta E所显示的那样。笔记本电脑的摄像头在大多数情况下并不出色,但 Acer Swift 3 SF316-51表明至少有可能通过拥有一个Delta E为10的网络摄像头而做得更好。理想情况下,Delta E应该低于3。

ColorChecker
24.6 ∆E
28.4 ∆E
28.8 ∆E
23 ∆E
31.6 ∆E
17.9 ∆E
21.9 ∆E
33.1 ∆E
20.2 ∆E
23.4 ∆E
16 ∆E
23.5 ∆E
27.5 ∆E
20 ∆E
20.6 ∆E
13.1 ∆E
25.9 ∆E
24.3 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
24.2 ∆E
25.8 ∆E
23.1 ∆E
9 ∆E
ColorChecker LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G: 21.66 ∆E min: 2.33 - max: 33.11 ∆E
ColorChecker
8.6 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
15.6 ∆E
9 ∆E
18 ∆E
16 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
18.4 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
12.4 ∆E
4 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
17.7 ∆E
0 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
15.3 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
ColorChecker Acer Swift 3 SF316-51: 10.62 ∆E min: 0 - max: 18.43 ∆E

辅料

除了通常的文件(保修信息、快速入门指南),这台笔记本电脑只配备了一个65瓦的电源适配器。

65瓦的充电器比笔记本电脑更厚。
65瓦的充电器比笔记本电脑更厚。

维护和软件

取下底盖后,你可以接触到内部结构。在五个橡胶脚的下面各有一个螺丝(粘在上面)。另外三颗螺丝被小盖子(粘在上面)所隐藏。盖子可以用平头螺丝刀拆下,脚则用塑料铲子拆下。一旦螺丝被卸下,底盖就可以很容易地从笔记本电脑上抬起来。

打开。解开所有的十字螺丝,包括橡胶脚下的螺丝。
打开。解开所有的十字螺丝,包括橡胶脚下的螺丝。
很方便。螺丝不会脱落和丢失。
很方便。螺丝不会脱落和丢失。
铰链是用多个螺钉连接的。
铰链是用多个螺钉连接的。
内存是板载的;没有空闲的插槽。
内存是板载的;没有空闲的插槽。

软件

LG软件结合了以下功能。LG备份,...
LG软件结合了以下功能。LG备份,...
...LG回收, ...
...LG回收, ...
...LG智能助理, ...
...LG智能助理, ...
...和LG更新与恢复。
...和LG更新与恢复。

担保

在德国,LG为16英寸的设备提供两年的保修期,并可选择延长保修期至三年,费用约为50欧元(50美元)。在美国,保修期为一年。保修条件可能因国家而异。

输入设备 - 对经常打字的人来说不是最佳选择

数字键盘、小方向键和黑键--Ultra PC上的键盘几乎与克16上的键盘相同。嗯,只是几乎一样。Gram的键盘有背光,但Ultra PC没有。因此,按键上的字体也是不同的。我们的评测单元上的字体是印上去的,而gram的键盘上的字母和数字由于有背光,是半透明的。

键盘

Chiclet键盘上平坦、光滑的按键具有较短的行程和非常明显的启动点。我们喜欢按键提供的清晰的阻力。在打字时,键盘表现出一些弯曲,特别是在中间和右侧,一直延伸到数字键盘。这阻碍了快速打字,并使键盘感觉不那么高级,因为你不能简单地按下键。总而言之,LG提供了一个足以满足日常使用的键盘,但我们不能向经常打字的人推荐它。

按键有明显的启动点,但按起来感觉很松散。
按键有明显的启动点,但按起来感觉很松散。

触摸板

点击板的光滑表面(13.2 x 8.2厘米,或5.2 x 3.2英寸)使手指能够轻松地滑过。点击板的四角也对输入作出反应。它有一个明显的点击深度(在下半部),一个明显的启动点和一个适度响亮的点击。

大型多点触控点击板,下半部有明显的启动点和明显的点击深度。
大型多点触控点击板,下半部有明显的启动点和明显的点击深度。

显示屏 - IPS面板,有云层

IPS面板的子像素
IPS面板的子像素
AMD Vari-Bright影响屏幕亮度
AMD Vari-Bright影响屏幕亮度

LG在Ultra PC上使用自己的面板(LG Display LP160WU1-SPH1)。对于专业用户和户外爱好者来说,这款笔记本电脑配备的是哑光显示屏,而不是像gram 16那样的光面显示屏,这是一个好消息。虽然Ultra PC与gram 16共享相同的16:10长宽比,但屏幕分辨率已经从gram的2,560 x 1,600降低到1,920 x 1,200。

像往常一样,AMD的CPU与Radeon软件一起工作。Vari-Bright可以根据屏幕上的内容调整显示亮度,默认情况下是启用的。但我们在测试显示屏和电池寿命时禁用了它。Ultra PC没有环境光传感器。显示器的峰值亮度低于平均水平,为269 cd/m²。1,128:1的对比度使该面板与竞争对手处于同一水平。然而,它的对比度低于LG.Philips在16号克的面板。

该显示器的响应时间不长,大约为28至38毫秒。但是,话说回来,这款笔记本电脑并不是为游戏而设计的。只有少数16英寸设备在这方面可以表现得更好。一个例子是 Honor MagicBook 16 2022,其显示屏的响应时间为10至17毫秒。一个积极的事情是,我们没有发现屏幕上有任何PWM闪烁。

黑屏上的背光出血:为了说明问题,延长曝光时间为1/5秒
黑屏上的背光出血:为了说明问题,延长曝光时间为1/5秒
黑屏上的背光出血:正常曝光时间为1/15秒
黑屏上的背光出血:正常曝光时间为1/15秒
黑屏上的背光出血。1/15秒 - 拉动屏幕时出血更厉害
黑屏上的背光出血。1/15秒 - 拉动屏幕时出血更厉害
255
cd/m²
272
cd/m²
271
cd/m²
263
cd/m²
299
cd/m²
275
cd/m²
259
cd/m²
261
cd/m²
271
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
LG Display LP160WU1-SPH1 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 299 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 269.6 cd/m² Minimum: 18.9 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 85 %
Center on Battery: 299 cd/m²
Contrast: 1128:1 (Black: 0.265 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.57 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 5.02
ΔE Greyscale 3.8 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
37% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
55% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
36% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.6
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
LG Display LP160WU1-SPH1, IPS, 1280x1200, 16.00
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Chi Mei CMN160B, IPS, 1920x1080, 16.10
LG Gram 16 (2021)
LG Philips LP160WQ1-SPA1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F
BOE NV15N4V, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05
Lenovo LEN156FHD, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Honor MagicBook 16 2022
NV161FHM-NH0, IPS, 1920x1080, 16.10
Display
84%
124%
1%
5%
85%
Display P3 Coverage
36
66.6
85%
95.8
166%
36.58
2%
68.4
90%
sRGB Coverage
55
99.5
81%
99.8
81%
54.37
-1%
59
7%
98.9
80%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
37
68.5
85%
83.8
126%
37.79
2%
38
3%
68.6
85%
Response Times
23%
7%
-14%
30%
60%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
38 ?(19, 19)
32 ?(15, 17)
16%
44 ?(19, 25)
-16%
44 ?(22, 22)
-16%
29 ?(13, 16)
24%
16.8 ?(8.4, 8.4)
56%
Response Time Black / White *
28 ?(16, 12)
20 ?(11, 9)
29%
20 ?(8, 12)
29%
31 ?(16, 15)
-11%
18 ?(9, 9)
36%
10.4 ?(6, 4.4)
63%
PWM Frequency
2500 ?(10)
1250 ?(90)
Screen
34%
2%
-8%
-43%
19%
Brightness middle
299
304
2%
331
11%
251
-16%
376
26%
342
14%
Brightness
270
284
5%
309
14%
241
-11%
341
26%
329
22%
Brightness Distribution
85
88
4%
88
4%
87
2%
78
-8%
92
8%
Black Level *
0.265
0.165
38%
0.22
17%
0.23
13%
0.66
-149%
0.29
-9%
Contrast
1128
1842
63%
1505
33%
1091
-3%
570
-49%
1179
5%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
4.57
1.44
68%
4.64
-2%
5.14
-12%
6.4
-40%
3.2
30%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
8.92
3.62
59%
9.82
-10%
18.41
-106%
20.45
-129%
5.5
38%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
5.02
3.16
37%
0.9
82%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
3.8
2.6
32%
6.9
-82%
1.08
72%
4.59
-21%
4.5
-18%
Gamma
2.6 85%
2.41 91%
2.34 94%
2.43 91%
2.26 97%
2.22 99%
CCT
6142 106%
6527 100%
7904 82%
6534 99%
6819 95%
7610 85%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
68.5
75.1
37.79
38
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.5
100
54.37
59
Total Average (Program / Settings)
47% / 44%
44% / 29%
-7% / -7%
-3% / -23%
55% / 39%

* ... smaller is better

IPS面板的色彩覆盖率相当乏善可陈。它甚至不能完全覆盖相对较小的sRGB色彩空间(55%)。虽然不是所有的竞争对手都更好,但其中有三个在色彩覆盖方面超过了Ultra PC:Acer Swift 3 SF316-51。Acer Swift 3 SF316-51, Honor MagicBook 16 2022和LG gram 16。

开箱后,LG Display面板的色彩还原度不错,但未能达到目标值(Delta E低于3),色差约为4.6。该面板没有任何蓝色的色调。校准确实提高了色彩的准确性,但只是对灰度而言。Delta E从3.8下降到0.4。另一方面,色彩的Delta E变得更糟,从4.6增加到5.0。我们使用Portrait Displays的Calman色彩校准软件进行了所有的测量。

卡尔曼灰度
卡尔曼灰度
卡尔曼灰度标定。Delta E得到改善
卡尔曼灰度标定。Delta E得到改善
考尔曼饱和度
考尔曼饱和度
Calman 饱和度校准
Calman 饱和度校准
卡尔曼颜色检查器
卡尔曼颜色检查器
卡尔曼色彩检查仪校准了。Delta E更差
卡尔曼色彩检查仪校准了。Delta E更差

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 16 ms rise
↘ 12 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 67 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
38 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 19 ms rise
↘ 19 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 49 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18071 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

由于采用了哑光处理,在户外也能看到显示屏。然而,平庸的峰值亮度对户外使用来说是适得其反的。以下照片是在最大屏幕亮度下拍摄的(Vari-Bright关闭)。

在户外使用时的亚光显示
在户外使用时的亚光显示
略有反映
略有反映
最难从侧面阅读
最难从侧面阅读

IPS面板具有宽广的视角,可以从任何位置轻松观看。

LG显示器LP160WU1-SPH1的可视角度
LG显示器LP160WU1-SPH1的可视角度
IPS面板的可视角度
IPS面板的可视角度
视角
视角
视角
视角

性能--为另一块SSD提供空间

Ryzen 3 5300U和8GB内存(板载)--这是入门级的超级电脑16
Ryzen 3 5300U和8GB内存(板载)--这是入门级的超级电脑16

我们的评测模型在LG的网站上找不到。该设备已经根据零售商的规格进行了配置,以便达到一个非常低的价格点--目前约为840至880欧元(840至880美元)。对于这个价格,你将得到一个四核的 AMD Ryzen 3 5300U处理器(八线程,时钟速度为2.60-3.80GHz),以及少量的内存(只有8GB)。其余的规格与酷睿i5型号相同,包括512GB固态硬盘。你应该仔细考虑Ryzen 3型号是否适合你,因为内存是焊接的,不可升级。

Ultra PC也可以选择八核的 Ryzen 7 5825U(2.0 GHz,提升速度可达4.5 GHz,16 MB的L3高速缓存)或六核 Ryzen 5 5625U(2.3 GHz,提升速度高达4.3 GHz,16 MB的L3高速缓存)。这两个变体默认配备16GB双通道内存,其价格从960欧元(960美元)起。

CPU-Z CPU
CPU-Z CPU
CPU-Z 主板
CPU-Z 主板
CPU-Z内存
CPU-Z内存
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWinfo摘要
HWinfo摘要

测试条件

与基于英特尔的克不同,Ultra PC没有配备LG控制中心。只有LG更新和恢复应用程序预装在系统中。这意味着你只有内置的Windows工具和Radeon软件供你使用,分别用于管理系统性能和GPU。我们将Radeon软件留在其默认设置中。因此,省电的FPS限制器没有被启用。我们还禁用了AMD Vari-Bright和所有Windows省电模式,并选择了 "最佳性能 "选项。在电池寿命测试中,电源计划被设置为 "平衡"。

处理器

淘宝网 AMD Ryzen 3 5300U使用Cinebench循环测试了带有八个线程的AMD Ryzen 3 5300U。Ultra PC的表现要好于 LG gram 16 (2021)但只是在多核测试中。所有其他配备Ryzen 5或7的笔记本电脑都远远领先于Ultra PC,性能好60%至100%。尽管如此,Ryzen 3 Ryzen 3有一个可敬的表现--在持续负载下,随着时间的推移,只有8%的小幅度性能下降。该处理器在最初几秒钟能够以26-27瓦的功率运行,然后迅速下降到20瓦(见第一个Cinebench运行的功率使用图)。在循环运行基准测试一段时间后,Ryzen 3稳定在大约18瓦,CPU温度上升到约90℃(194℉)。

在没有任何中断的持续负载下(如R15循环),Ryzen 3的反应是将其时钟速度降低到略高于3.0 GHz,导致APU的功耗保持在稳定的17瓦特。这个数字与该芯片能够达到的30瓦的PL2(短时爆发)和25瓦的PL1(持续)相差甚远。看来LG已经降低了极限,以降低机箱温度和尽量减少噪音。这对笔记本电脑的排放是很好的,我们稍后会看到,但(略)影响了我们能从CPU获得多少性能。

AMD Ryzen 3 5300U,4核2.60-3.80 GHz,10-25 W cTDP,代号Lucienne
AMD Ryzen 3 5300U,4核2.60-3.80 GHz,10-25 W cTDP,代号Lucienne
时钟速度、温度和功率使用@Cinebench R15 Multi
时钟速度、温度和功率使用@Cinebench R15 Multi
时钟速度、温度和功耗 @Cinebench R15多环路
时钟速度、温度和功耗 @Cinebench R15多环路
比较。Cinebench R15 Multi-Loop与Prime95的比较
比较。Cinebench R15 Multi-Loop与Prime95的比较

Cinebench R15 Multi Sustained Load

0851702553404255105956807658509351020110511901275136014451530Tooltip
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G AMD Ryzen 3 5300U: Ø749 (726.74-795.75)
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 Intel Core i7-11370H: Ø926 (914.45-1017.58)
LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Core i7-1165G7: Ø596 (474.78-805.25)
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F AMD Ryzen 7 5700U: Ø1318 (1231-1485.99)
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 AMD Ryzen 5 5500U: Ø1208 (1173.12-1266.74)
Honor MagicBook 16 2022 AMD Ryzen 5 5600H: Ø1601 (1588.94-1610.89)
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating
Honor MagicBook 16 2022
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
83.7 pt
Average of class Office
 
73.8 pt
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Core i7-11370H
71.5 pt
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
66 pt
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
63.4 pt
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Intel Core i7-1165G7
58.1 pt
Average AMD Ryzen 3 5300U
 
51 pt
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G -2!
AMD Ryzen 3 5300U
45.3 pt
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Honor MagicBook 16 2022
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
9699 Points +103%
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
8836 Points +85%
Average of class Office
  (1056 - 15743, n=121, last 2 years)
8030 Points +68%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
7221 Points +51%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Core i7-11370H
6182 Points +30%
Average AMD Ryzen 3 5300U
  (4772 - 5522, n=3)
5212 Points +9%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
AMD Ryzen 3 5300U
4772 (4564.04min - 4772.47max) Points
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Intel Core i7-1165G7
4652 Points -3%
Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Core i7-11370H
1556 Points +41%
Average of class Office
  (529 - 1995, n=120, last 2 years)
1451 Points +32%
Honor MagicBook 16 2022
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
1381 Points +25%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Intel Core i7-1165G7
1311 Points +19%
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
1177 Points +7%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
1149 Points +4%
Average AMD Ryzen 3 5300U
  (1102 - 1129, n=3)
1115 Points +1%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
AMD Ryzen 3 5300U
1102 Points
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Honor MagicBook 16 2022
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
3748 Points +99%
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
3215 Points +71%
Average of class Office
  (356 - 5904, n=119, last 2 years)
3085 Points +64%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
2758 Points +46%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Core i7-11370H
2299 Points +22%
Average AMD Ryzen 3 5300U
  (1883 - 2138, n=4)
2039 Points +8%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
AMD Ryzen 3 5300U
1883 Points
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Intel Core i7-1165G7
1847 Points -2%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Core i7-11370H
601 Points +39%
Average of class Office
  (181.3 - 764, n=119, last 2 years)
558 Points +29%
Honor MagicBook 16 2022
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
538 Points +25%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Intel Core i7-1165G7
518 Points +20%
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
491 Points +14%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
456 Points +6%
Average AMD Ryzen 3 5300U
  (431 - 441, n=4)
436 Points +1%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
AMD Ryzen 3 5300U
431 Points
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Honor MagicBook 16 2022
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
1611 (1588.94min - 1610.89max) Points +94%
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
1486 (1231min - 1485.99max) Points +79%
Average of class Office
  (160.8 - 2642, n=119, last 2 years)
1392 Points +67%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
1267 (1173.12min - 1266.74max) Points +52%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Core i7-11370H
1018 (914.45min - 1017.58max) Points +22%
Average AMD Ryzen 3 5300U
  (832 - 915, n=3)
884 Points +6%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
AMD Ryzen 3 5300U
832 Points
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Intel Core i7-1165G7
805 Points -3%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Core i7-11370H
232 Points +40%
Honor MagicBook 16 2022
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
224 Points +35%
Average of class Office
  (82.6 - 284, n=117, last 2 years)
216 Points +30%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Intel Core i7-1165G7
205 Points +23%
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
188.9 Points +14%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
177 Points +7%
Average AMD Ryzen 3 5300U
  (166 - 170, n=3)
168.7 Points +2%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
AMD Ryzen 3 5300U
166 Points
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Intel Core i7-1165G7
771 Seconds * -25%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
AMD Ryzen 3 5300U
617 Seconds *
Average AMD Ryzen 3 5300U
  (524 - 617, n=3)
562 Seconds * +9%
Average of class Office
  (214 - 2844, n=119, last 2 years)
535 Seconds * +13%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Core i7-11370H
507 Seconds * +18%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
418 Seconds * +32%
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
367 Seconds * +41%
Honor MagicBook 16 2022
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
316 Seconds * +49%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Honor MagicBook 16 2022
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
44613 MIPS +133%
Average of class Office
  (4226 - 62349, n=120, last 2 years)
34626 MIPS +81%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
33768 MIPS +76%
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
32529 MIPS +70%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Core i7-11370H
27015 MIPS +41%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Intel Core i7-1165G7
22300 MIPS +16%
Average AMD Ryzen 3 5300U
  (19170 - 24366, n=3)
21836 MIPS +14%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
AMD Ryzen 3 5300U
19170 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Honor MagicBook 16 2022
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
5409 MIPS +44%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Core i7-11370H
5393 MIPS +44%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Intel Core i7-1165G7
5113 MIPS +36%
Average of class Office
  (2233 - 6687, n=120, last 2 years)
5007 MIPS +33%
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
4541 MIPS +21%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
4323 MIPS +15%
Average AMD Ryzen 3 5300U
  (3755 - 4198, n=3)
3971 MIPS +6%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
AMD Ryzen 3 5300U
3755 MIPS
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Average of class Office
  (1018 - 11980, n=121, last 2 years)
6590 Points
Honor MagicBook 16 2022
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
6495 Points
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Core i7-11370H
6115 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
5367 Points
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Intel Core i7-1165G7
5163 Points
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
4254 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 3 5300U
  (3730 - 4191, n=3)
3976 Points
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Core i7-11370H
1607 Points
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Intel Core i7-1165G7
1500 Points
Average of class Office
  (510 - 1974, n=121, last 2 years)
1468 Points
Honor MagicBook 16 2022
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
1428 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
1116 Points
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
1105 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 3 5300U
  (1040 - 1080, n=3)
1063 Points
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Honor MagicBook 16 2022
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
12.6 fps +115%
Average of class Office
  (1.55 - 17.4, n=119, last 2 years)
9.18 fps +56%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
8.24 fps +40%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Core i7-11370H
7.7 fps +31%
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
6.97 fps +19%
Average AMD Ryzen 3 5300U
  (5.87 - 6.74, n=3)
6.38 fps +9%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
AMD Ryzen 3 5300U
5.87 fps
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Intel Core i7-1165G7
5.63 fps -4%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
AMD Ryzen 3 5300U
77.1 s *
Average AMD Ryzen 3 5300U
  (63.4 - 77.1, n=3)
72.4 s * +6%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
67.3 s * +13%
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
65.4 s * +15%
Average of class Office
  (31.3 - 117.5, n=119, last 2 years)
56.7 s * +26%
Honor MagicBook 16 2022
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
53.5 s * +31%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Intel Core i7-1165G7
45.9 s * +40%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Core i7-11370H
41.1 s * +47%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
AMD Ryzen 3 5300U
0.664 sec *
Average AMD Ryzen 3 5300U
  (0.654 - 0.664, n=3)
0.659 sec * +1%
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
0.641 sec * +3%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
0.635 sec * +4%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Intel Core i7-1165G7
0.625 sec * +6%
Average of class Office
  (0.4244 - 1.397, n=118, last 2 years)
0.588 sec * +11%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Core i7-11370H
0.548 sec * +17%
Honor MagicBook 16 2022
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
0.534 sec * +20%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
10611
Cinebench R10 Shading 64Bit
10281 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
5118
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
22139
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
35101 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
8723 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
9.29 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
60.04 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.89 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
98 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
54.81 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
166 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
832 Points
Help
Performance Rating
Honor MagicBook 16 2022
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, Vega 7
89.2 pt
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, Vega 8
79.8 pt
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, Vega 7
69.6 pt
Average of class Office
 
66.5 pt
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
51.3 pt
Average AMD Ryzen 3 5300U
 
50.2 pt
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G -1!
AMD Ryzen 3 5300U, Vega 6
44.9 pt
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Honor MagicBook 16 2022
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, Vega 7
11618 KRay/s +222%
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, Vega 8
10500 KRay/s +191%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, Vega 7
8612 KRay/s +138%
Average of class Office
  (763 - 24250, n=119, last 2 years)
8353 KRay/s +131%
Average AMD Ryzen 3 5300U
  (3612 - 7053, n=3)
5893 KRay/s +63%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
4894 KRay/s +35%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
AMD Ryzen 3 5300U, Vega 6
3612 KRay/s
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Honor MagicBook 16 2022
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, Vega 7
71761 Points +114%
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, Vega 8
58343 Points +74%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, Vega 7
49306 Points +47%
Average of class Office
  (4027 - 102228, n=119, last 2 years)
44699 Points +33%
Average AMD Ryzen 3 5300U
  (33606 - 37829, n=3)
36371 Points +8%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
AMD Ryzen 3 5300U, Vega 6
33606 Points
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
23249 Points -31%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Honor MagicBook 16 2022
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, Vega 7
2443 MB/s
Average of class Office
  (279 - 4442, n=118, last 2 years)
1940 MB/s
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, Vega 8
1924 MB/s
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, Vega 7
1670 MB/s
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
1573 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen 3 5300U
  (1244 - 1248, n=2)
1246 MB/s
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, Vega 8
88852 Points +73%
Honor MagicBook 16 2022
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, Vega 7
76930 Points +50%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, Vega 7
72332 Points +41%
Average of class Office
  (8031 - 113016, n=119, last 2 years)
67458 Points +31%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
AMD Ryzen 3 5300U, Vega 6
51411 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 3 5300U
  (51280 - 51454, n=3)
51382 Points 0%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
50442 Points -2%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, Vega 8
12208 Points +83%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, Vega 7
10108 Points +51%
Honor MagicBook 16 2022
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, Vega 7
8952 Points +34%
Average of class Office
  (404 - 14288, n=119, last 2 years)
6752 Points +1%
Average AMD Ryzen 3 5300U
  (6686 - 6703, n=3)
6692 Points 0%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
AMD Ryzen 3 5300U, Vega 6
6687 Points
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
4038 Points -40%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Honor MagicBook 16 2022
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, Vega 7
39607 Points +126%
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, Vega 8
30570 Points +74%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, Vega 7
25846 Points +47%
Average of class Office
  (2054 - 54365, n=119, last 2 years)
23572 Points +34%
Average AMD Ryzen 3 5300U
  (17564 - 20109, n=3)
19233 Points +10%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
AMD Ryzen 3 5300U, Vega 6
17564 Points
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
14077 Points -20%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
Honor MagicBook 16 2022
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, Vega 7
94826 MB/s +391%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
58344 MB/s +202%
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, Vega 8
58026 MB/s +201%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, Vega 7
50257 MB/s +160%
Average of class Office
  (5226 - 147611, n=119, last 2 years)
47448 MB/s +146%
Average AMD Ryzen 3 5300U
  (19307 - 34964, n=3)
29732 MB/s +54%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
AMD Ryzen 3 5300U, Vega 6
19307 MB/s
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, Vega 8
643 MB/s +72%
Honor MagicBook 16 2022
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, Vega 7
619 MB/s +66%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, Vega 7
565 MB/s +51%
Average of class Office
  (67.6 - 1018, n=119, last 2 years)
533 MB/s +43%
Average AMD Ryzen 3 5300U
  (374 - 396, n=3)
388 MB/s +4%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
AMD Ryzen 3 5300U, Vega 6
374 MB/s
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
287 MB/s -23%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Honor MagicBook 16 2022
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, Vega 7
6082 KRay/s +90%
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, Vega 8
5699 KRay/s +78%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, Vega 7
4703 KRay/s +47%
Average of class Office
  (432 - 12755, n=119, last 2 years)
4455 KRay/s +39%
Average AMD Ryzen 3 5300U
  (3199 - 3768, n=3)
3571 KRay/s +12%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
AMD Ryzen 3 5300U, Vega 6
3199 KRay/s
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
2579 KRay/s -19%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
44296 MPixel/s +162%
Average of class Office
  (4814 - 48177, n=119, last 2 years)
24080 MPixel/s +42%
Average AMD Ryzen 3 5300U
  (16799 - 17037, n=3)
16916 MPixel/s 0%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
AMD Ryzen 3 5300U, Vega 6
16913 MPixel/s
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, Vega 7
16576 MPixel/s -2%
Honor MagicBook 16 2022
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, Vega 7
15652 MPixel/s -7%
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, Vega 8
6903 MPixel/s -59%

系统性能

根据PCMark 10,应用性能在所有子项得分中都相当乏力,甚至低于办公笔记本电脑中两年的平均水平。该CPU与 Ryzen 7 5700U相比,戴尔Inspiron的Ryzen 7 5700U的性能要好11%。在Crossmark这一替代基准中,5300U和5700U之间几乎没有任何区别(+4-7%)。这就是说,我们知道, 戴尔Inspiron 15 5515并没有完全发挥APU的潜力;这也是我们对该设备的批评之一。那些想在预算内获得出色性能的人应该看看配备Ryzen H系列APU的设备,例如 Honor MagicBook 16 2022配备 Ryzen 5 5600H.这将给你带来最大的实惠--即使是在CPU基准测试中。

我们不能对Ryzen 7变体的超极本电脑是否会有更好的性能做出任何广泛的声明。这真的取决于其冷却解决方案的容量和指定的功率限制。

Ultra PC在PCMark 10中落后于所有其他设备。
Ultra PC在PCMark 10中落后于所有其他设备。
PCMark 10 / Score
Honor MagicBook 16 2022
Vega 7, R5 5600H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
6107 Points +42%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-11370H, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD
5459 Points +27%
Average of class Office
  (2325 - 7157, n=104, last 2 years)
5340 Points +24%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05
Vega 7, R5 5500U
5218 Points +21%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG
4917 Points +14%
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F
Vega 8, R7 5700U, Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
4775 Points +11%
Average AMD Ryzen 3 5300U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
  (4299 - 5006, n=3)
4563 Points +6%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
Vega 6, R3 5300U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
4299 Points
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Honor MagicBook 16 2022
Vega 7, R5 5600H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
10339 Points +31%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-11370H, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD
10241 Points +30%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG
10149 Points +28%
Average of class Office
  (5095 - 20841, n=104, last 2 years)
9828 Points +24%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05
Vega 7, R5 5500U
9125 Points +15%
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F
Vega 8, R7 5700U, Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
8347 Points +6%
Average AMD Ryzen 3 5300U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
  (7833 - 9015, n=3)
8250 Points +4%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
Vega 6, R3 5300U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
7903 Points
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Honor MagicBook 16 2022
Vega 7, R5 5600H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
9540 Points +45%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05
Vega 7, R5 5500U
7942 Points +20%
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F
Vega 8, R7 5700U, Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
7619 Points +16%
Average of class Office
  (3041 - 10198, n=104, last 2 years)
7453 Points +13%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-11370H, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD
7388 Points +12%
Average AMD Ryzen 3 5300U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
  (6596 - 7852, n=3)
7063 Points +7%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG
6888 Points +4%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
Vega 6, R3 5300U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
6596 Points
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Honor MagicBook 16 2022
Vega 7, R5 5600H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
6268 Points +52%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-11370H, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD
5838 Points +41%
Average of class Office
  (1912 - 9056, n=104, last 2 years)
5782 Points +40%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05
Vega 7, R5 5500U
5320 Points +29%
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F
Vega 8, R7 5700U, Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
4647 Points +12%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG
4616 Points +12%
Average AMD Ryzen 3 5300U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
  (4136 - 4811, n=3)
4425 Points +7%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
Vega 6, R3 5300U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
4136 Points
CrossMark / Overall
Honor MagicBook 16 2022
Vega 7, R5 5600H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1353 Points +45%
Average of class Office
  (348 - 1891, n=104, last 2 years)
1313 Points +40%
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F
Vega 8, R7 5700U, Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
976 Points +4%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
Vega 6, R3 5300U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
935 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 3 5300U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
  (932 - 935, n=2)
934 Points 0%
CrossMark / Productivity
Honor MagicBook 16 2022
Vega 7, R5 5600H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1384 Points +41%
Average of class Office
  (393 - 1870, n=104, last 2 years)
1330 Points +35%
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F
Vega 8, R7 5700U, Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
1048 Points +7%
Average AMD Ryzen 3 5300U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
  (983 - 989, n=2)
986 Points 0%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
Vega 6, R3 5300U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
983 Points
CrossMark / Creativity
Honor MagicBook 16 2022
Vega 7, R5 5600H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1367 Points +49%
Average of class Office
  (340 - 1982, n=104, last 2 years)
1348 Points +47%
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F
Vega 8, R7 5700U, Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
941 Points +2%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
Vega 6, R3 5300U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
920 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 3 5300U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
  (899 - 920, n=2)
910 Points -1%
CrossMark / Responsiveness
Honor MagicBook 16 2022
Vega 7, R5 5600H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1225 Points +45%
Average of class Office
  (258 - 2017, n=104, last 2 years)
1184 Points +40%
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F
Vega 8, R7 5700U, Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
879 Points +4%
Average AMD Ryzen 3 5300U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
  (844 - 866, n=2)
855 Points +1%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
Vega 6, R3 5300U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
844 Points
PCMark 10 Score
4299 points
Help
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
64091 MB/s +78%
Average of class Office
  (7158 - 84290, n=120, last 2 years)
42295 MB/s +17%
Honor MagicBook 16 2022
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, Vega 7
38158 MB/s +6%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
AMD Ryzen 3 5300U, Vega 6
36092 MB/s
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, Vega 7
34196 MB/s -5%
Average AMD Ryzen 3 5300U
  (30710 - 36092, n=3)
32744 MB/s -9%
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, Vega 8
15867 MB/s -56%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
62442 MB/s +81%
Honor MagicBook 16 2022
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, Vega 7
43610 MB/s +26%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, Vega 7
42872 MB/s +24%
Average of class Office
  (7325 - 75550, n=120, last 2 years)
42852 MB/s +24%
Average AMD Ryzen 3 5300U
  (34493 - 35443, n=3)
35003 MB/s +1%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
AMD Ryzen 3 5300U, Vega 6
34493 MB/s
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, Vega 8
17632 MB/s -49%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
66479 MB/s +64%
Average of class Office
  (7579 - 94965, n=120, last 2 years)
46139 MB/s +14%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
AMD Ryzen 3 5300U, Vega 6
40554 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen 3 5300U
  (38052 - 40554, n=3)
39056 MB/s -4%
Honor MagicBook 16 2022
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, Vega 7
35547 MB/s -12%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, Vega 7
31943 MB/s -21%
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, Vega 8
11554 MB/s -72%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
AMD Ryzen 3 5300U, Vega 6
113.5 ns *
Average AMD Ryzen 3 5300U
  (97.1 - 113.5, n=3)
103.5 ns * +9%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, Vega 7
99.4 ns * +12%
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, Vega 8
98.5 ns * +13%
Average of class Office
  (44.3 - 188.3, n=121, last 2 years)
96.5 ns * +15%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
92.6 ns * +18%
Honor MagicBook 16 2022
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, Vega 7
75.6 ns * +33%

* ... smaller is better

DPC延时

在我们的标准化延迟监测测试中(网页浏览、4K视频播放、Prime95高负荷),我们观察到笔记本电脑的DPC延迟的问题。即使最高的中断处理是相当温和的517毫秒,我们在播放4K YouTube视频时看到50个丢帧。Latency Mon怀疑这个问题可能与Wi-Fi驱动程序或BIOS中的CPU节流设置有关。然而,我们找不到任何负面指标,即使是在高级选项下(Ctrl+Alt+Shift+F7)。因此,以其目前的驱动程序配置,该系统似乎不适合实时视频和音频处理。

DPC 延迟Mon - 摘要
DPC 延迟Mon - 摘要
DPC 延迟 Mon - 驱动程序
DPC 延迟 Mon - 驱动程序
DPC 延迟 Mon - Youtube 50 掉帧数
DPC 延迟 Mon - Youtube 50 掉帧数
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F
Vega 8, R7 5700U, Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
3312 μs * -541%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05
Vega 7, R5 5500U
874 μs * -69%
Honor MagicBook 16 2022
Vega 7, R5 5600H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
527.3 μs * -2%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
Vega 6, R3 5300U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
517 μs *
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-11370H, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD
435.4 μs * +16%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG
420.3 μs * +19%

* ... smaller is better

大容量存储

第二个M.2 22x60插槽是免费的,允许你添加另一个SSD。
第二个M.2 22x60插槽是免费的,允许你添加另一个SSD。

三星SSD(PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU)的容量为512GB。还有一个更大的1TB选项用于Ryzen 7型号。由于笔记本电脑没有预装很多软件,开箱后大约有420GB的可用存储空间。PM991驱动器是市场上相当快的SSD之一。但它在超极本上的性能低于平均水平。这一点,加上少量的内存,可能是在PCMark 10和Crossmark中获得的平淡结果的原因。在持续负载下,三星固态硬盘的性能略有下降--但情况并不一定如此,正如PM9A1固态硬盘在 Honor 魔法书16.

Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
Sequential Read: 2211MB/s
Sequential Write: 1057MB/s
4K Read: 36.22MB/s
4K Write: 91.17MB/s
4K-64 Read: 553MB/s
4K-64 Write: 861MB/s
Access Time Read: 0.159ms
Access Time Write: 0.043ms
Score Read: 810Points
Score Write: 1055Points
Score Total: 2229Points
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Honor MagicBook 16 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
90.9 pt
LG Gram 16 (2021)
SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG
73.4 pt
Average of class Office
 
67.7 pt
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05
 
52.9 pt
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD
49 pt
Average Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
 
46.8 pt
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
40.9 pt
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F
Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
31.4 pt
DiskSpd
seq read
Average of class Office
  (482 - 4315, n=104, last 2 years)
2440 MB/s +53%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG
1730 (1725.12min - 1730.26max) MB/s +8%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05
 
1684 (1321.21min - 1684.01max) MB/s +6%
Honor MagicBook 16 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1684 (1497.16min - 1684.03max) MB/s +6%
Average Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
  (1188 - 1882, n=10)
1613 MB/s +1%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
1596 (1575.17min - 1595.93max) MB/s
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F
Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
1536 (1503.31min - 1536.37max) MB/s -4%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD
915 (911min - 915.46max) MB/s -43%
seq write
Honor MagicBook 16 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
3083 (3059.29min - 3082.81max) MB/s +135%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG
2489 (1082.97min - 2488.9max) MB/s +90%
Average of class Office
  (333 - 5842, n=104, last 2 years)
2344 MB/s +79%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05
 
1498 (987.97min - 1497.52max) MB/s +14%
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F
Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
1331 (1216.01min - 1330.85max) MB/s +2%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
1311 (1226.41min - 1311.35max) MB/s
Average Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
  (195.5 - 1706, n=10)
1284 MB/s -2%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD
886 (874.58min - 886.14max) MB/s -32%
seq q8 t1 read
Average of class Office
  (535 - 7120, n=104, last 2 years)
3971 MB/s +37%
Honor MagicBook 16 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
3553 (3425.49min - 3553.39max) MB/s +23%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG
3445 (3030.59min - 3444.78max) MB/s +19%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
2890 (2377.4min - 2890.29max) MB/s
Average Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
  (1655 - 3111, n=10)
2703 MB/s -6%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05
 
2659 (2544.63min - 2659.19max) MB/s -8%
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F
Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
2181 (1887.86min - 2181.16max) MB/s -25%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD
989 (886.37min - 989.44max) MB/s -66%
seq q8 t1 write
Honor MagicBook 16 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
3497 (3490.5min - 3496.86max) MB/s +103%
Average of class Office
  (276 - 6791, n=104, last 2 years)
2976 MB/s +73%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG
2496 (2283.43min - 2496.07max) MB/s +45%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
1725 (1683.37min - 1724.81max) MB/s
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05
 
1603 (1311.14min - 1603.48max) MB/s -7%
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F
Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
1409 (1405.09min - 1408.87max) MB/s -18%
Average Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
  (228 - 1832, n=10)
1387 MB/s -20%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD
887 (882.81min - 887.42max) MB/s -49%
4k q1 t1 read
Honor MagicBook 16 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
65 (64.37min - 65max) MB/s +88%
Average of class Office
  (17.7 - 89.9, n=104, last 2 years)
57.6 MB/s +67%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG
54.3 (54.16min - 54.32max) MB/s +57%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD
53.3 (52.75min - 53.25max) MB/s +54%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05
 
46 (45.57min - 46.04max) MB/s +33%
Average Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
  (34.5 - 55, n=10)
44.8 MB/s +30%
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F
Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
37.9 (36.98min - 37.92max) MB/s +10%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
34.5 (33.47min - 34.53max) MB/s
4k q1 t1 write
LG Gram 16 (2021)
SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG
208 (205.9min - 208.09max) MB/s +119%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD
178 (175.48min - 177.72max) MB/s +88%
Average of class Office
  (32 - 429, n=104, last 2 years)
161 MB/s +70%
Honor MagicBook 16 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
146.7 (145.98min - 146.73max) MB/s +55%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05
 
128 (127.16min - 128.1max) MB/s +35%
Average Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
  (94.8 - 188.2, n=10)
124.2 MB/s +31%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
94.8 (92.36min - 94.81max) MB/s
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F
Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
94.5 (92.8min - 94.54max) MB/s 0%
4k q32 t16 read
Honor MagicBook 16 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
3417 (3415.45min - 3417.19max) MB/s +574%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG
2139 (1104.16min - 2139.02max) MB/s +322%
Average of class Office
  (184.2 - 4425, n=104, last 2 years)
1243 MB/s +145%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05
 
1068 (1065.87min - 1067.86max) MB/s +111%
Average Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
  (507 - 1244, n=10)
807 MB/s +59%
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F
Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
701 (671.64min - 700.93max) MB/s +38%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
507 (486.92min - 507.33max) MB/s
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD
428 (425.72min - 427.51max) MB/s -16%
4k q32 t16 write
Honor MagicBook 16 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
2916 (2882.87min - 2916.33max) MB/s +920%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG
1641 (1097.57min - 1640.78max) MB/s +474%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05
 
1174 (961.12min - 1174.48max) MB/s +310%
Average of class Office
  (192.2 - 3254, n=104, last 2 years)
920 MB/s +222%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD
592 (162.65min - 592.1max) MB/s +107%
Average Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
  (206 - 830, n=10)
430 MB/s +50%
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F
Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
306 (300.02min - 306.18max) MB/s +7%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
286 (268.44min - 286.33max) MB/s
AS SSD
Score Total
Honor MagicBook 16 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
7574 Points +240%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG
4934 Points +121%
Average of class Office
  (704 - 9204, n=101, last 2 years)
3939 Points +77%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05
 
3398 Points +52%
Average Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
  (1472 - 3394, n=10)
2662 Points +19%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD
2644 Points +19%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
2229 Points
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F
Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
1948 Points -13%
Score Read
Honor MagicBook 16 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
2797 Points +245%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG
1915 Points +136%
Average of class Office
  (252 - 3364, n=101, last 2 years)
1419 Points +75%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05
 
1383 Points +71%
Average Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
  (756 - 1484, n=10)
1075 Points +33%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD
865 Points +7%
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F
Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
823 Points +2%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
810 Points
Score Write
Honor MagicBook 16 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
3351 Points +218%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG
2060 Points +95%
Average of class Office
  (320 - 4111, n=101, last 2 years)
1837 Points +74%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD
1358 Points +29%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05
 
1351 Points +28%
Average Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
  (244 - 1279, n=10)
1091 Points +3%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
1055 Points
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F
Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
733 Points -31%
Seq Read
Average of class Office
  (508 - 5796, n=101, last 2 years)
3148 MB/s +42%
Honor MagicBook 16 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
2983 MB/s +35%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG
2808 MB/s +27%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05
 
2549 MB/s +15%
Average Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
  (2211 - 2744, n=10)
2446 MB/s +11%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
2211 MB/s
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD
2015 MB/s -9%
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F
Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
1276 MB/s -42%
Seq Write
Honor MagicBook 16 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
2953 MB/s +179%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG
2345 MB/s +122%
Average of class Office
  (304 - 5880, n=101, last 2 years)
2054 MB/s +94%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05
 
1571 MB/s +49%
Average Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
  (180 - 1735, n=10)
1167 MB/s +10%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
1057 MB/s
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD
1055 MB/s 0%
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F
Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
548.03 MB/s -48%
4K Read
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD
73.9 MB/s +104%
Honor MagicBook 16 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
59.44 MB/s +64%
Average of class Office
  (18.7 - 91.1, n=101, last 2 years)
56.3 MB/s +55%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG
50.2 MB/s +39%
Average Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
  (34.3 - 51.4, n=10)
42.4 MB/s +17%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05
 
41.92 MB/s +16%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
36.22 MB/s
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F
Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
33.31 MB/s -8%
4K Write
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD
223.2 MB/s +145%
Average of class Office
  (35.4 - 350, n=101, last 2 years)
158.3 MB/s +74%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG
138.6 MB/s +52%
Honor MagicBook 16 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
132.84 MB/s +46%
Average Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
  (91.2 - 163.5, n=10)
125.5 MB/s +38%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05
 
110.3 MB/s +21%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
91.17 MB/s
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F
Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
70.44 MB/s -23%
4K-64 Read
Honor MagicBook 16 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
2438.86 MB/s +341%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG
1584 MB/s +186%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05
 
1086 MB/s +96%
Average of class Office
  (182.3 - 2713, n=101, last 2 years)
1047 MB/s +89%
Average Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
  (486 - 1182, n=10)
789 MB/s +43%
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F
Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
662.17 MB/s +20%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD
589 MB/s +7%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
553 MB/s
4K-64 Write
Honor MagicBook 16 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
2922.54 MB/s +239%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG
1687 MB/s +96%
Average of class Office
  (132.3 - 3394, n=101, last 2 years)
1474 MB/s +71%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05
 
1083 MB/s +26%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD
1029 MB/s +20%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
861 MB/s
Average Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
  (121.3 - 1070, n=10)
849 MB/s -1%
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F
Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
608.11 MB/s -29%
Access Time Read
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F
Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
0.169 ms * -6%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
0.159 ms *
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05
 
0.119 ms * +25%
Average Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
  (0.049 - 0.225, n=10)
0.116 ms * +27%
Average of class Office
  (0.022 - 0.295, n=101, last 2 years)
0.08048 ms * +49%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD
0.056 ms * +65%
Honor MagicBook 16 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
0.038 ms * +76%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG
0.035 ms * +78%
Access Time Write
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F
Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
0.219 ms * -409%
Average of class Office
  (0.017 - 0.619, n=101, last 2 years)
0.0646 ms * -50%
Average Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
  (0.023 - 0.103, n=10)
0.0517 ms * -20%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
0.043 ms *
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD
0.039 ms * +9%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05
 
0.034 ms * +21%
Honor MagicBook 16 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
0.031 ms * +28%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG
0.028 ms * +35%

* ... smaller is better

Sustained Load Read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

018036054072090010801260144016201800198021602340252027002880306032403420Tooltip
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU: Ø2363 (1977.61-2904.77)
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe: Ø1425 (1215.72-2359.72)
Honor MagicBook 16 2022 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ: Ø3543 (2809.14-3559.51)

图形卡

ǞǞǞ Radeon RX Vega 6仍然基于Ryzen 4000系列(Vega Renoir),使用7纳米工艺制造。它的工作频率为0.4-1.5GHz。在我们的测试中,该GPU能够超过RX Vega 8在 戴尔Inspiron 15 5515从而证实了戴尔并没有能够利用GPU的大部分功率。然而,这并不表明Ryzen 7 5700U的典型性能。 Ryzen 7 5700UVega 8图形。的 Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs在相关的3DMark测试中取得了第一名(+50/70%)。

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-11370H
100 pt
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7
93.7 pt
Average of class Office
 
77 pt
Honor MagicBook 16 2022
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
72.4 pt
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
67.8 pt
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
 
54 pt
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 3 5300U
53 pt
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
38.2 pt
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-11370H
6904 Points +70%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7
6305 Points +55%
Average of class Office
  (1474 - 12230, n=113, last 2 years)
5932 Points +46%
Honor MagicBook 16 2022
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
5496 Points +35%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
5257 Points +29%
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
  (3401 - 4713, n=23)
4146 Points +2%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 3 5300U
4072 Points
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
3459 Points -15%
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-11370H
33402 Points +70%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7
29609 Points +50%
Honor MagicBook 16 2022
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
28408 Points +44%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
24916 Points +26%
Average of class Office
  (5681 - 58068, n=96, last 2 years)
24181 Points +23%
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
  (15227 - 24163, n=16)
20712 Points +5%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 3 5300U
19698 Points
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
13941 Points -29%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-11370H
5771 Points +129%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7
5654 Points +124%
Average of class Office
  (712 - 8815, n=115, last 2 years)
4125 Points +64%
Honor MagicBook 16 2022
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
3465 Points +37%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
3395 Points +35%
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
  (2122 - 3239, n=23)
2673 Points +6%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 3 5300U
2522 Points
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
1694 Points -33%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-11370H
1717 Points +99%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7
1664 Points +93%
Average of class Office
  (242 - 3186, n=111, last 2 years)
1341 Points +56%
Honor MagicBook 16 2022
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
1116 Points +29%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
1057 Points +23%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 3 5300U
862 Points
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
  (650 - 996, n=22)
821 Points -5%
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
540 Points -37%
3DMark 06 1024x768 Score
17429 points
3DMark 11 Performance
4334 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
15310 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
2301 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
972 points
Help

游戏性能

F1 2022:只有在最低设置下才可以玩。由于内存不足,游戏也会偶尔崩溃。
F1 2022:只有在最低设置下才可以玩。由于内存不足,游戏也会偶尔崩溃。

我们的游戏测试也证实了该GPU的糟糕性能:RX Vega 6交付的结果并不令人惊讶,表现比Vega 7略差,比Iris Xe G7 96EUs差得多。 Iris Xe G7 96EUs.你不可能在Ryzen 3的iGPU上做很多游戏。 Ryzen 3即使使用双通道内存。当分辨率和细节设置全部调低时,我们测试的所有游戏都只能以边缘可玩的帧率运行。对性能要求很高的新游戏在笔记本电脑上甚至无法播放。例如,由于内存不足,F1 2022在中等设置下不断崩溃。

The Witcher 3 - 1366x768 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Core i7-11370H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
62.6 fps +101%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
47.7 (3.04min, 19.1P0.1, 27.9P1) fps +53%
Average of class Office
  (7.82 - 89, n=96, last 2 years)
44.9 fps +44%
Honor MagicBook 16 2022
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
42 fps +35%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
41.1 fps +32%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
AMD Ryzen 3 5300U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
31.1 fps
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
  (21.3 - 39, n=13)
29.6 fps -5%
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
19.6 fps -37%
GTA V - 1366x768 Normal/Off AF:4x
Honor MagicBook 16 2022
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
99 (14.4min, 66.7P1) fps +19%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
84.8 (6.27min, 40P1) fps +2%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
AMD Ryzen 3 5300U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
83 fps
Average of class Office
  (7.47 - 153.1, n=102, last 2 years)
81.8 fps -1%
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
  (69.9 - 97.5, n=5)
80.7 fps -3%
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 high (2/3)
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
AMD Ryzen 3 5300U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
70.9 (59.6min) fps
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Core i7-11370H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
59 (51.1min) fps -17%
Honor MagicBook 16 2022
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
51.3 (46.3min) fps -28%
Average of class Office
  (8.9 - 110.4, n=122, last 2 years)
50.1 fps -29%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
48.9 (44.8min) fps -31%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
47.1 (8.8min) fps -34%
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
  (32 - 70.9, n=21)
42.7 fps -40%
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
25.5 (23.4min) fps -64%
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1280x720 Lite Quality
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
37.4 fps +140%
Average of class Office
  (5.42 - 94, n=114, last 2 years)
35.4 fps +127%
Honor MagicBook 16 2022
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
35 fps +124%
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
  (15.6 - 32.2, n=9)
25.9 fps +66%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
AMD Ryzen 3 5300U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
15.6 fps
X-Plane 11.11 - 1280x720 low (fps_test=1)
Honor MagicBook 16 2022
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
51.6 fps +50%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Core i7-11370H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
46.4 fps +35%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
42.6 fps +24%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
40.8 fps +19%
Average of class Office
  (9.12 - 109.9, n=122, last 2 years)
40.3 fps +17%
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
  (33.1 - 45.6, n=20)
38.2 fps +11%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
AMD Ryzen 3 5300U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
34.4 fps
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
26.9 fps -22%
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 medium AA:medium AF:4
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
41.2 (22.1min, 24.2P1) fps +60%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Core i7-11370H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
40.3 (10.6min, 19P1) fps +57%
Average of class Office
  (8.6 - 75.7, n=107, last 2 years)
32.8 fps +28%
Honor MagicBook 16 2022
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
31.5 (26.4min, 28P1) fps +23%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
AMD Ryzen 3 5300U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
25.7 (19.9min, 22.6P1) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
  (17 - 30.3, n=6)
24.7 fps -4%
F1 2021 - 1280x720 Ultra Low Preset
Average of class Office
  (18.2 - 197.8, n=30, last 2 years)
93.8 fps +38%
Honor MagicBook 16 2022
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
91.1 (70min, 71P1) fps +34%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
AMD Ryzen 3 5300U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
67.9 (24min, 33P1) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
  (31.9 - 67.9, n=2)
49.9 fps -27%
F1 22 - 1920x1080 Low Preset AA:T AF:16x
Average of class Office
  (13.6 - 107.4, n=40, last 2 years)
46 fps +12%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
AMD Ryzen 3 5300U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
40.9 (34min) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
  (17.4 - 40.9, n=4)
29.7 fps -27%

归根结底,Vega 6的稳定性能 Vega 6在Witcher 3 Ultra环路中的稳定性能其实并不意味着什么--8到9个FPS并不会让任何玩家满意。也就是说,Ultra PC不需要让游戏玩家满意,因为他们无论如何都不会购买这种配置,因为 Ryzen 3的性能很差。

Witcher 3 FPS Chart

012345678910111213141516171819Tooltip
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G R3 5300U, Vega 6: Ø8.77 (2-10)
LG Gram 16 (2021) i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs: Ø15.5 (8-20)
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F R7 5700U, Vega 8: Ø7.07 (6-8)
Honor MagicBook 16 2022 R5 5600H, Vega 7: Ø12.3 (11-14)
low med. high ultra4K
GTA V (2015) 94 83 21 8
The Witcher 3 (2015) 48.6 31.1 14.5 8.6
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 134.4 119.5 70.9 66.1 29
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 15.6
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 34.4 28.5 24.2
Far Cry 5 (2018) 36 20 17
Strange Brigade (2018) 63.8 25.7 21.2 18.1
F1 2021 (2021) 67.9 28
F1 22 (2022) 40.9 0 ()

排放--安静的Windows PC

噪声排放

虽然Ultra PC并不是完全无声的,但风扇在空闲时运行非常安静(25.4 dB(A)),我们只有把耳朵贴在笔记本上才能听到它。即使在我们的压力测试中,尽管风扇一直在快速旋转,但风扇的噪音并不令人讨厌,只有36 dB(A),而且最关键的是,保持在一个恒定的水平。我们的评测单元没有产生任何其他噪音。

Noise Level

Idle
25 / 25 / 25.4 dB(A)
Load
36.2 / 36.4 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 25 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2024.324.522.830.224.3253228.729.329.4323125.829.128.730.725.84019.221.72425.419.2502629.328.823.1266317.122.520.624.317.18015.321.823.11815.310016.119.420.715.716.112514.717.91818.714.716015.918.317.614.715.920015.218.818.314.315.225013.819.719.11313.831514.322.723.212.214.340012.922.922.211.612.95001219.920.111.51263012.220.520.211.312.280013.224.323.411.413.210001426.326.111.614125012.926.225.911.512.9160012.624.424.511.712.6200013.327.527.712.213.3250012.925.925.712.512.9315013.225.925.312.813.2400013.425.525.213.113.450001423.22313.414630013.719.519.413.513.7800013.716.11613.613.71000013.714.614.413.513.71250013.7141413.313.7160001313.613.712.713SPL25.436.436.324.725.4N0.72.32.30.60.7median 13.7median 20.5median 20.7median 12.8median 13.7Delta0.93.43.51.30.930.929.530.928.230.930.630.934.632.230.634.131.629.231.934.128.42626.627.828.424.123.724.328.624.121.124.223.92421.118.918.519.822.618.918.117.217.918.318.118.919.120.118.418.919.520.420.716.919.518.419.219.31618.417.41819.114.217.416.217.119.713.716.215.817.421.51315.815.218.522.312.515.215.418.822.412.415.415.620.425.412.615.616.323.629.412.416.315.123.329.412.715.115.221.827.612.915.215.222.929.313.715.215.421.928.813.715.415.420.928.11415.415.518.627.814.115.515.71825.114.415.715.917.523.714.515.91617.422.415.11616.518.420.41516.517.219.319.81517.215.217.216.313.515.227.832.83925.927.811.62.90.71median 15.8median 18.8median 22.4median 14median 15.80.81.63.71.10.822.12425.124.82728.331.331.928.126.931.334.827.423.625.828.832.632.626.534.82524.72133.821.421.520.227.322.422.620.927.918.216.414.334.716.616.414.42615.21713.321.815.816.113.11917.318.318.621.919.119.618.319.116.916.912.31816.116.811.916.616.817.111.717.219.219.811.819.418.818.912.519.719.119.31219.421.221.412.521.720.320.512.920.821.121.11321.219.219.513.220.316.817.413.619.915.81613.727.516.11614.131.317.416.814.930.317.217.61423.613.313.312.817.330.931.125.5361.31.40.72.2median 17.3median 17.4median 13.2median 20.81.41.61.23hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseLG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36GAcer Swift 3 SF316-51LG Gram 16 (2021)
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
Vega 6, R3 5300U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-11370H, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F
Vega 8, R7 5700U, Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05
Vega 7, R5 5500U
Noise
-3%
3%
-2%
-6%
off / environment *
25
26
-4%
26
-4%
25.4
-2%
26
-4%
Idle Minimum *
25
26
-4%
26
-4%
25.4
-2%
26
-4%
Idle Average *
25
26
-4%
26
-4%
25.4
-2%
26
-4%
Idle Maximum *
25.4
27.7
-9%
26
-2%
25.4
-0%
26
-2%
Load Average *
36.2
32.7
10%
30.8
15%
34
6%
42.6
-18%
Load Maximum *
36.4
39
-7%
31.1
15%
40
-10%
37.4
-3%

* ... smaller is better

温度

在不处理密集任务时,LG笔记本电脑的温度只比室温略高。在负载情况下,表面温度达到40-45℃(104-113℉)。最高的温度是在靠近显示器铰链的底盖中间测量的。考虑到风扇通过铰链附近的排气口将热空气推出设备,这并不令人惊讶。笔记本电脑不仅能够在压力和持续负载下保持相对凉爽,而且你可以一直在腿上使用它,没有问题或烧伤的风险。

 26.4 °C26.5 °C26.1 °C 
 26.7 °C26.4 °C26.2 °C 
 25.4 °C25.4 °C25.1 °C 
Maximum: 26.7 °C
Average: 26 °C
27.3 °C28.2 °C27 °C
26.8 °C26.9 °C26.7 °C
26.1 °C26.1 °C26.2 °C
Maximum: 28.2 °C
Average: 26.8 °C
Power Supply (max.)  27.9 °C | Room Temperature 22.1 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.3 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 29.5 °C / 85 F for the devices in the class Office.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.5 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 34.2 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 36.7 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29.3 °C / 84.7 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.7 °C / 81.9 F (-1.6 °C / -2.8 F).
配备Ryzen 3 5300U的LG Ultra PC 16英寸--闲置时的热量分布(顶部)
配备Ryzen 3 5300U的LG Ultra PC 16英寸--闲置时的热量分布(顶部)
配备Ryzen 3 5300U的LG Ultra PC 16英寸--闲置时的热量分布(底部)
配备Ryzen 3 5300U的LG Ultra PC 16英寸--闲置时的热量分布(底部)
配备Ryzen 3 5300U的LG Ultra PC 16英寸--压力测试期间的热量分布(顶部)
配备Ryzen 3 5300U的LG Ultra PC 16英寸--压力测试期间的热量分布(顶部)
配备Ryzen 3 5300U的LG Ultra PC 16英寸--压力测试期间的热量分布(底部)
配备Ryzen 3 5300U的LG Ultra PC 16英寸--压力测试期间的热量分布(底部)
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
AMD Ryzen 3 5300U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Core i7-11370H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
Honor MagicBook 16 2022
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
Heat
-8%
-1%
-12%
1%
3%
Maximum Upper Side *
39.5
40
-1%
46.9
-19%
39.4
-0%
40.5
-3%
41.6
-5%
Maximum Bottom *
45
47
-4%
45.1
-0%
45.4
-1%
42
7%
43.1
4%
Idle Upper Side *
26.7
30.1
-13%
26.4
1%
33.2
-24%
26.5
1%
25.4
5%
Idle Bottom *
28.2
31.6
-12%
24.1
15%
35.1
-24%
29
-3%
25.6
9%

* ... smaller is better

压力测试

LG Ultra PC 16在压力测试中遇到了困难。CPU的时钟速度在短暂达到3.1GHz的峰值后稳定在2600MHz。GPU运行在一个适度的810兆赫,这与它的最大时钟速度1,500兆赫相差甚远。在这种性能节流的情况下,温度保持在恒定的86℃(187°F)。

相比之下,在Cinebench循环中,CPU的时钟速度要高得多,在稳定在3.2GHz之前短暂达到3.8GHz的峰值。在这两种情况下,CPU的总功率使用量激增到27瓦,然后稳定在17-18瓦。

压力测试 Prime95 & Furmark
压力测试 Prime95 & Furmark
在R15环路和压力测试期间,CPU行为的比较
在R15环路和压力测试期间,CPU行为的比较
CPU时钟(GHz) GPU时钟(MHz) CPU平均温度(℃) GPU平均温度(℃)
系统空闲 2.6 400 45 41
Prime95压力 3.1 400 92 74
Prime95 + FurMark 压力 2.60 810 86 76
Cinebench R15循环 2.12 400 70 57

发言人

合格的左、右扬声器
合格的左、右扬声器

立体声扬声器听起来还不错,但缺乏低音。我们建议使用一副耳机或外部扬声器以获得更好的音频体验。内置的双阵列麦克风大多能够产生无噪音的音频记录。对着麦克风说话的人可以离笔记本电脑最远约2米(6.6英尺)。LG预装了完整版的CyberLink AudioDirector,可用于编辑和混合音乐或音频记录。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2024.530.224.52531.329.431.33127.230.727.24020.425.420.45028.123.128.16318.324.318.38015.71815.710016.615.716.612522.118.722.11603414.73420036.414.336.425049.51349.531558.312.258.340067.411.667.45006711.5676306511.36580066.411.466.4100065.411.665.4125066.411.566.4160067.611.767.6200065.312.265.3250066.912.566.9315062.812.862.840006113.161500070.413.470.4630072.313.572.3800070.113.670.1100007113.5711250065.713.365.71600062.112.762.1SPL79.724.779.7N470.647median 65.4median 12.8median 65.4Delta8.41.38.430.528.230.542.832.242.831.231.931.225.627.825.624.828.624.821.92421.920.222.620.225.518.325.532.618.432.63716.93743.21643.255.214.255.25913.75964.61364.660.212.560.261.712.461.768.612.668.669.512.469.567.512.767.568.512.968.568.513.768.567.613.767.668.41468.467.914.167.973.214.473.272.714.572.775.215.175.274.91574.972157264.513.564.582.325.982.353.50.753.5median 67.6median 14median 67.66.81.16.829.425.129.437.831.337.835.531.335.530.125.830.13526.53527.82127.825.920.225.934.820.934.843.514.343.549.314.449.346.413.346.454.113.154.159.318.659.365.418.365.462.612.362.662.211.962.268.811.768.870.311.870.366.912.566.967.61267.66612.56666.912.966.966.71366.764.813.264.868.713.668.770.213.770.269.414.169.474.114.974.176.11476.174.312.874.380.825.580.849.60.749.6median 66.7median 13.2median 66.76.31.26.3hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseLG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36GAcer Swift 3 SF316-51LG Gram 16 (2021)
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 31% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 40% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 44% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 48% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 30% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

LG Gram 16 (2021) audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 15% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电源管理--高效的笔记本电脑

消耗功率

Ultra PC的用电量相当低,但对于里面的硬件来说是典型的。在空闲状态下,我们测得的功耗不超过9瓦左右。减少一些设置甚至使空闲时的功耗下降到大约4瓦特。

压力测试(同时运行Prime95和FurMark至少一个小时)导致功耗增加到45瓦--但只是暂时的。下图显示了在压力测试期间,由于显著的CPU和GPU节流,功耗如何在很短的时间内下降到40瓦以下。系统最终稳定在40瓦左右。

该电源的额定功率为65瓦。另外,Ultra PC也可以使用USB-C充电器充电,即使是输出功率较低的充电器(如45瓦)。不过,如果你使用瓦数较低的充电器,系统会通知你,它可能不会以全性能运行。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.15 / 1.55 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 3.7 / 6.8 / 8.6 Watt
Load midlight 30 / 45 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
R3 5300U, Vega 6, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU, IPS, 1280x1200, 16.00
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD, IPS, 1920x1080, 16.10
LG Gram 16 (2021)
i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F
R7 5700U, Vega 8, Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05
R5 5500U, Vega 7, , IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Honor MagicBook 16 2022
R5 5600H, Vega 7, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 16.10
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
 
Average of class Office
 
Power Consumption
-15%
-16%
-6%
-19%
-40%
-7%
-19%
Idle Minimum *
3.7
4.8
-30%
3.8
-3%
3.8
-3%
3.7
-0%
5.1
-38%
3.98 ?(3.7 - 5.8, n=23)
-8%
4.28 ?(2.2 - 9.6, n=106, last 2 years)
-16%
Idle Average *
6.8
7.4
-9%
9
-32%
6.6
3%
7.9
-16%
8.7
-28%
6.53 ?(5 - 8.4, n=23)
4%
7.34 ?(3.8 - 20.6, n=106, last 2 years)
-8%
Idle Maximum *
8.6
9
-5%
11.3
-31%
8
7%
9.3
-8%
9.2
-7%
8.65 ?(5.3 - 11, n=23)
-1%
9.11 ?(4.8 - 23.9, n=106, last 2 years)
-6%
Load Average *
30
34.9
-16%
35.2
-17%
33.4
-11%
41
-37%
50.7
-69%
35 ?(27.6 - 48, n=23)
-17%
40.8 ?(8.7 - 75.2, n=105, last 2 years)
-36%
Witcher 3 ultra *
30.2
34.9
-16%
33.6
-11%
41
-36%
45.9
-52%
Load Maximum *
45
51.4
-14%
43.5
3%
54
-20%
52.2
-16%
66.5
-48%
51.5 ?(35.4 - 97.2, n=23)
-14%
57.8 ?(11.1 - 101.4, n=106, last 2 years)
-28%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stress test

051015202530354045Tooltip
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G R3 5300U, Vega 6; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø30.2 (26.8-40.3)
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G R3 5300U, Vega 6; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø39.4 (33.7-47.6)

Power Consumption with External Monitor

0510152025303540Tooltip
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø30.2 (28.1-43.5)
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø33 (28.9-42.5)
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø29.4 (27-31.4)
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø28.3 (27.1-35.8)
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø3.51 (2.62-13.4)

电池寿命

闲置状态下的电池寿命为32小时(最低亮度,禁用无线功能)。
闲置状态下的电池寿命为32小时(最低亮度,禁用无线功能)。

由于其低功率使用和72Wh的大电池,Ultra PC拥有出色的耐力,可以毫不费力地跟上 LG gram 16在电池寿命方面。在我们的Wi-Fi测试中,我们的评测设备比基于英特尔的克16多持续了整整85分钟,后者的电池容量为80Wh。我们谈论的是一个在屏幕亮度降低到150cd/m²(比最大亮度低4级)时可以实际运行17小时的设备。

Ultra PC的多核性能高于配备Core i7的gram。这反映在其负载下的电力使用上(即运行Battery Eater Classic):Ultra PC在141分钟内完全耗尽其电池,而gram则需要258分钟才能做到这一点。

在闲置状态下,Ultra PC甚至能够持续32小时(在最低亮度和启动飞行模式的情况下),令人印象深刻。诚然,这个数字对于日常使用可能并不那么重要,但没有一个竞争对手能在这方面击败这台笔记本电脑。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
32h 17min
WiFi Websurfing
17h 06min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness
12h 06min
Load (maximum brightness)
2h 21min
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
R3 5300U, Vega 6, 72 Wh
LG Gram 16 (2021)
i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 80 Wh
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 56 Wh
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F
R7 5700U, Vega 8, 54 Wh
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05
R5 5500U, Vega 7, 70 Wh
Honor MagicBook 16 2022
R5 5600H, Vega 7, 56 Wh
Average of class Office
 
Battery Runtime
21%
-36%
-19%
-12%
-56%
-28%
Reader / Idle
1937
1713
-12%
1205
-38%
1435 ?(527 - 2359, n=22, last 2 years)
-26%
WiFi v1.3
1026
943
-8%
585
-43%
627
-39%
839
-18%
491
-52%
594 ?(300 - 1137, n=106, last 2 years)
-42%
Load
141
258
83%
103
-27%
144
2%
134
-5%
57
-60%
119.4 ?(56 - 218, n=65, last 2 years)
-15%
H.264
1204
615
645
925
484
699 ?(348 - 1112, n=39, last 2 years)
Witcher 3 ultra
130
110
152 ?(142 - 162, n=2, last 2 years)

Pros

+ 伟大的电池寿命
+ 低排放
+ 重量适中
+ 可接受的入门级性能
+ 免费的M.2插槽可用于另一个SSD

Cons

- 只有8GB的内存,没有扩展选项
- 键盘弯曲
- 严重的背光灯渗漏
- 只有一个USB-C接口
- 网络摄像头质量很差

结论 - 比克的耐力更强

LG Ultra PC 16 (2022年) - 不是轻量级的,但有很长的电池寿命
LG Ultra PC 16 (2022年) - 不是轻量级的,但有很长的电池寿命

LG Ultra PC 16是那些买不起或不愿意支付真正的LG gram的人的替代品吗?

不,与格子机不同,Ultra PC的设计并不是为了尽可能地轻巧。这款16英寸的笔记本电脑比其16英寸的克重整整重了400克(0.88磅),部分原因是其底盘不是由镁制成的。除此以外,Ultra PC似乎是gram的复制品--但电池寿命更长,噪音更低,外观也更简洁、精致。

Ultra PC没有两个带Power Delivery的Thunderbolt 4端口,而只有一个USB-C端口(同样带Power Delivery)。LG包括一个65瓦的充电器,带有一个小小的桶状插头,这样你就可以在不占用USB-C端口的情况下插入笔记本电脑。

那些希望以实惠的价格获得超长电池寿命的人绝对应该考虑LG Ultra PC 16。这是因为它的竞争对手没有一个能在现实中持续接近Ultra PC所能达到的17小时。

但并不是所有闪闪发光的东西都是金子。8GB的内存是不可扩展的,你真的需要仔细考虑这对你来说是否足够。尽管严重的背光渗漏只有在屏幕变黑和你在黑暗的地方时才会被注意到,但每次移动边框都会变得更糟。此外,键盘表现出弯曲,感觉很脆弱,我们不会向经常打字的人推荐。

8GB的焊接内存,没有任何扩展选项--这是需要记住的事情。我们建议购买价格略高的16GB型号。

Ultra PC在这里不是为了取代克拉克,但(就价格而言)是其他轻薄型全能商务笔记本电脑的替代品,如 Acer Swift 3 SF316-51联想IdeaPad 5 15ALC05.该 Swift 3特别是,以其卓越的显示屏、更好的键盘和Thunderbolt端口脱颖而出。

同样的,基于AMD的 IdeaPad 5 15ALC05在谈到性价比的时候,是一个重要的选择。虽然这款15.6英寸的笔记本电脑并不完全出众,但它能够充分利用Ryzen 5的潜力,并提供令人印象深刻的14小时的电池寿命(在我们150cd/m²的Wi-Fi测试中)。

价格和可用性

我们的审查模型,配备了一个 Ryzen 38GB内存和512GB固态硬盘,可从Cyberport839欧元(839美元)的价格(仅在德国)。在美国,你可以直接从LG获得配备Ryzen 7、16GB内存和1TB存储空间的机型,价格为1100美元。以1,100美元的价格。

LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G - 10/20/2022 v7
Sebastian Jentsch

Chassis
83 / 98 → 85%
Keyboard
74%
Pointing Device
92%
Connectivity
62 / 80 → 77%
Weight
68 / 20-75 → 87%
Battery
92%
Display
79%
Games Performance
59 / 78 → 75%
Application Performance
85 / 95 → 90%
Temperature
92%
Noise
95%
Audio
76%
Camera
35 / 85 → 41%
Average
76%
84%
Office - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > LG Ultra PC 16 (2022) AMD评论。这不是一个克。
Sebastian Jentsch, 2022-10-28 (Update: 2022-10-28)