Notebookcheck Logo

联想 IdeaPad 310-15IKB 笔记本电脑简短评测

一般般。联想希望凭借这台设备从600欧元（约4376人民币）以下设备中脱颖而出。我们将会通过接下来的详尽评测考察IdeaPad 310-15IKB是否具备这个潜力。
Laptop / Notebook Kaby Lake Windows
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15IKB (Ideapad 310 Series)
Processor
Intel Core i5-7200U 2 x 2.5 - 3.1 GHz, Kaby Lake
Graphics adapter
Intel HD Graphics 620
Memory
8 GB 
, DDR4-2133, 一个内存槽已占用
Display
15.60 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, BOE NT156FHM-N31, TN LED, glossy: yes
Mainboard
Intel Kaby Lake-U Premium PCH
Storage
Hynix HFS128G3MND, 128 GB 
, 1 TB 东芝 MQ02ABF100 机械硬盘于光驱位
Soundcard
Conexant SmartAudio HD
Connections
2 USB 2.0, 1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 VGA, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 3.5毫米整合音频接口, Card Reader: 四合一SD读卡器
Networking
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.0
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 24 x 380 x 260
Battery
30 Wh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 720p
Additional features
Speakers: 立体声扬声器, Keyboard: 孤岛式, 6 行, 数字键盘锁定键, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
2.2 kg, Power Supply: 168 g
Price
529 Euro
Links
Lenovo homepage
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Max opening angle
Max opening angle
The case of the laptop...
...is made entirely of plastic.
The display cover.
The bottom of the laptop with the maintenance flaps closed.
The touchpad has poor controls.
The right side of the keyboard has a number pad.
Closer look: webcam.
The hard-drive slot has a 1 TB HDD.

Size Comparison

❌
384 mm 270 mm 28 mm 2.3 kg384 mm 255 mm 24 mm 2.1 kg380 mm 260 mm 24 mm 2.2 kg379 mm 260 mm 22.9 mm 2.2 kg379 mm 260 mm 22.9 mm 2.2 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
Right: 2x USB 2.0, ODD slot, Kensington lock
Right: 2x USB 2.0, ODD slot, Kensington lock
Left: DC-In, VGA, Ethernet, HDMI, USB 3.0, 3.5 mm jack, SD-card reader
Left: DC-In, VGA, Ethernet, HDMI, USB 3.0, 3.5 mm jack, SD-card reader
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
 
107.8 MB/s +367%
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15IKB
 
23.1 MB/s
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261
 
19.1 MB/s -17%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
 
250.6 MB/s +906%
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261
 
26.1 MB/s +5%
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15IKB
 
24.9 MB/s
Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
634 MBit/s +98%
Acer Aspire E5-774-54HJ
Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter (jseb)
341 MBit/s +6%
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15IKB
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165
321 MBit/s
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
510 MBit/s +79%
Acer Aspire E5-774-54HJ
Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter (jseb)
307 MBit/s +8%
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15IKB
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165
285 MBit/s
Keyboard
Keyboard
188
cd/m²		188
cd/m²		184
cd/m²
185
cd/m²		185
cd/m²		182
cd/m²
181
cd/m²		181
cd/m²		179
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
BOE NT156FHM-N31 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 188 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 183.7 cd/m² Minimum: 3 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 95 %
Center on Battery: 185 cd/m²
Contrast: 661:1 (Black: 0.28 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 8.07 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 8.83 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
57% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
36.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
39.34% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
57.3% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
38.07% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.47
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15IKB
BOE NT156FHM-N31, , 1920x1080, 15.60		Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE
BOE HF NV156FHM-N42, , 1920x1080, 15.60		Acer Aspire E5-774-54HJ
AU Optronics B173HTN01.1, , 1920x1080, 17.30		HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA
AU Optronics AUO38ED, , 1920x1080, 15.60		Medion Akoya P6670
LG Philips LP156WF6-SPK3, , 1920x1080, 15.60		Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK
LG Philips LP156WHU-TPG1, , 1366x768, 15.60
Display
12%
73%
-4%
0%
-3%
Display P3 Coverage
38.07
42.66
12%
71.3
87%
36.51
-4%
38.14
0%
37.06
-3%
sRGB Coverage
57.3
64.1
12%
91.7
60%
55
-4%
57.2
0%
55.8
-3%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
39.34
44.08
12%
67.1
71%
37.72
-4%
39.43
0%
38.29
-3%
Response Times
-50%
-4%
1%
-2%
16%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
43 ?(21, 22)
51 ?(18, 33)
-19%
42 ?(21, 21)
2%
40 ?(20, 20)
7%
42 ?(18, 24)
2%
27 ?(7, 20)
37%
Response Time Black / White *
21 ?(5, 16)
38 ?(8, 30)
-81%
23 ?(6, 17)
-10%
22 ?(6, 16)
-5%
22 ?(6, 16)
-5%
22 ?(11, 11)
-5%
PWM Frequency
50 ?(10)
1000 ?(90)
50
50 ?(80)
Screen
36%
30%
-19%
2%
-6%
Brightness middle
185
291
57%
353
91%
219
18%
287
55%
200
8%
Brightness
184
265
44%
320
74%
222
21%
269
46%
198
8%
Brightness Distribution
95
86
-9%
82
-14%
85
-11%
74
-22%
83
-13%
Black Level *
0.28
0.23
18%
0.38
-36%
0.39
-39%
0.65
-132%
0.28
-0%
Contrast
661
1265
91%
929
41%
562
-15%
442
-33%
714
8%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
8.07
4.78
41%
5.07
37%
12.67
-57%
5.42
33%
10.63
-32%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
14.83
9.51
36%
10.12
32%
20.99
-42%
9.54
36%
15.69
-6%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
8.83
3.49
60%
13.38
-52%
13.82
-57%
5.14
42%
11.19
-27%
Gamma
2.47 89%
2.58 85%
2.69 82%
2.63 84%
2.48 89%
1.78 124%
CCT
10628 61%
6013 108%
15991 41%
15633 42%
6952 93%
11258 58%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
36.2
40
10%
60.1
66%
35
-3%
36
-1%
35
-3%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
57
64
12%
91.6
61%
55
-4%
57
0%
56
-2%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-1% / 20%
33% / 34%
-7% / -13%
0% / 1%
2% / -2%

* ... smaller is better

Gray levels (calibrated)
Gray levels (calibrated)
Colors (calibrated)
Colors (calibrated)
Saturation (calibrated)
Saturation (calibrated)
Gray levels (calibrated)
Gray levels (calibrated)
Colors (calibrated)
Colors (calibrated)
Saturation (calibrated)
Saturation (calibrated)

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
21 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5 ms rise
↘ 16 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 40 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
43 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 21 ms rise
↘ 22 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 67 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17924 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE
Intel Core i7-7500U
148 Points +15%
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK
Intel Core i7-6500U
131 Points +2%
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15IKB
Intel Core i5-7200U
129 Points
Medion Akoya P6670
Intel Core i5-6200U
117 Points -9%
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA
Intel Core i5-6200U
116 Points -10%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE
Intel Core i7-7500U
338 Points +9%
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK
Intel Core i7-6500U
312 Points 0%
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15IKB
Intel Core i5-7200U
311 Points
Medion Akoya P6670
Intel Core i5-6200U
291 Points -6%
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA
Intel Core i5-6200U
288 Points -7%
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
44.4 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.7 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
311 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
129 Points
Help
PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE
GeForce 940MX, i7-7500U, Liteonit CV3-DE256
3778 Points +9%
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK
GeForce 920MX, 6500U, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPCX-24UE4T0
3497 Points +1%
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15IKB
HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Hynix HFS128G3MND
3457 Points
Medion Akoya P6670
GeForce 940MX, 6200U, Phison S11-128G
3396 Points -2%
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-256G
3317 Points -4%
Acer Aspire E5-774-54HJ
HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Western Digital Scorpio Blue WD5000LPCX-24C6HT0
2854 Points -17%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3457 points
Help
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15IKB
Hynix HFS128G3MND		Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE
Liteonit CV3-DE256		HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA
SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-256G		Medion Akoya P6670
Phison S11-128G		Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK
AS SSD
24%
-1%
15%
75%
Seq Read
511
479.8
-6%
495.8
-3%
492.2
-4%
1179
131%
Seq Write
200.6
377.8
88%
316.9
58%
385.2
92%
372.8
86%
4K Read
24.49
32.4
32%
19.37
-21%
40.83
67%
29.52
21%
4K Write
63.6
59.7
-6%
75.3
18%
77.2
21%
92
45%
4K-64 Read
302.9
345.5
14%
137.4
-55%
371.3
23%
723
139%
4K-64 Write
145.4
203.7
40%
198.8
37%
271.9
87%
197.7
36%
Access Time Read *
0.117
0.127
-9%
0.111
5%
0.174
-49%
0.055
53%
Access Time Write *
0.116
0.066
43%
0.157
-35%
0.321
-177%
0.035
70%
Score Read
378
426
13%
206
-46%
461
22%
870
130%
Score Write
229
301
31%
306
34%
388
69%
327
43%

* ... smaller is better

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
AS SSD
hddimg
Hynix HFS128G3MND
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 540 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 213.7 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 240.3 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 198.8 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 475.5 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 207.6 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 15.4 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 69.4 MB/s
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Medion Akoya P6670
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-6200U
2516 Points +68%
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i7-7500U
2436 Points +62%
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK
NVIDIA GeForce 920MX, Intel Core i7-6500U
1835 Points +22%
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15IKB
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
1502 Points
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U
1257 Points -16%
3DMark 11 Performance
1621 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
5728 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
825 points
Help
low med. high ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 54.1 31.21 25.79
Company of Heroes 2 (2013) 24.62 18.7
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 19.8

Noise Level

Idle
30.6 / 30.6 / 30.6 dB(A)
Load
36.8 / 38.2 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
  
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 29 dB(A)
Max. Load
 29.7 °C28.9 °C24 °C 
 34.1 °C30.8 °C24 °C 
 30.2 °C28.1 °C24.2 °C 
Maximum: 34.1 °C
Average: 28.2 °C
24.6 °C31.6 °C26.9 °C
24.2 °C30.4 °C35.6 °C
23.9 °C28 °C33 °C
Maximum: 35.6 °C
Average: 28.7 °C
Power Supply (max.)  37.5 °C | Room Temperature 20.1 °C | Fluke 62 Max
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 28.2 °C / 83 F, compared to the average of 29.5 °C / 85 F for the devices in the class Office.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34.1 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 34.2 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.6 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 36.7 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.2 °C / 86.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.7 °C / 81.9 F (-2.5 °C / -4.5 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2027.934.72532.134.23133.229.64037.932.65038.8416332.331.38028.228.710035.936.412535.239.916024.447.520024.554.925024.760.131523.262.640022.260.950021.162.663020.559.880019.863.1100019.766.7125019.665160019.468.5200019.461.7250019.158315019.364.5400019.163.7500019.263.4630019.360.5800019.358.91000019.558.21250019.3571600019.155.6SPL32.275.6N1.837.9median 19.6median 60.5Delta1.74.135.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.72.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseLenovo Ideapad 310-15IKBApple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15IKB audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 17% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.32 / 0.46 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 3.5 / 6.1 / 7 Watt
Load midlight 31.2 / 42.9 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15IKB
i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Hynix HFS128G3MND, TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.60		Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE
i7-7500U, GeForce 940MX, Liteonit CV3-DE256, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60		HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA
6200U, HD Graphics 520, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-256G, TN, 1920x1080, 15.60		Medion Akoya P6670
6200U, GeForce 940MX, Phison S11-128G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60		Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK
6500U, GeForce 920MX, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPCX-24UE4T0, TN LED, 1366x768, 15.60
Power Consumption
-22%
12%
-49%
-40%
Idle Minimum *
3.5
3.9
-11%
3.6
-3%
6.7
-91%
7
-100%
Idle Average *
6.1
7.4
-21%
6
2%
9.2
-51%
8
-31%
Idle Maximum *
7
9.5
-36%
6.4
9%
9.7
-39%
8.4
-20%
Load Average *
31.2
41
-31%
26
17%
40.6
-30%
38.8
-24%
Load Maximum *
42.9
48
-12%
28.1
34%
58
-35%
52.8
-23%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
10h 12min
WiFi Websurfing (Edge)
3h 50min
Load (maximum brightness)
1h 21min
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15IKB
i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 30 Wh		Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE
i7-7500U, GeForce 940MX, 30 Wh		HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA
6200U, HD Graphics 520, 41 Wh		Medion Akoya P6670
6200U, GeForce 940MX, 44 Wh		Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK
6500U, GeForce 920MX, 31 Wh
Battery Runtime
20%
30%
22%
44%
Reader / Idle
612
634
4%
WiFi v1.3
230
275
20%
347
51%
280
22%
332
44%
Load
81
109
35%
H.264
313

Pros

+ 实惠
+ 相对优秀的键盘
+ 几乎不会变热
+ 大容量存储空间

Cons

- 廉价机身有许多弱点
- 无USB-C
- 无键盘背光
- 读卡器速度慢
- 负载下降频
- 硬盘噪音大
- 电池容量小
In review: Lenovo IdeaPad 310-15IKB. Test model provided by campuspoint.de
In review: Lenovo IdeaPad 310-15IKB. Test model provided by campuspoint.de

联想IdeaPad 310-15IKB是一台以办公和多媒体为核心的全功能设备。不过，如果想要成为一台称职的多媒体笔记本电脑的话，它还需要搭配更好的屏幕和更强的显卡。另一方面，尽管有一些缺点，它还是可以很好地胜任办公设备的用途。如果你希望在安静的环境内工作的话，它可能不太适合你，因为它的硬盘噪音会一直陪着你。这个问题可以通过升级固态硬盘得到解决。它的触控版鼠标按键不是很实用，但是键盘十分优秀。在移动中使用可能会比较困难，因为它的屏幕品质较低同时电池容量较小。

综合各个方面，我们没有十足的信心向用户推荐这台IdeaPad。它表现一般，无法在竞争中取得先机。

那么IdeaPad 310-15IKB有什么卖点呢？它最大的一个亮点可能是价位。这台笔记本电脑比一部分同类设备便宜一些。不过另一方面，仔细对比竞争机型你会发现，稍高的价位会带来好出许多的IPS屏幕。这会是个十分重要的改进，因为这台测试机的屏幕品质是它最大的弱点。  

注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。 

Lenovo Ideapad 310-15IKB - 11/29/2016 v5.1(old)
Benjamin Herzig

Chassis
73 / 98 → 74%
Keyboard
78%
Pointing Device
81%
Connectivity
40 / 80 → 50%
Weight
62 / 20-67 → 89%
Battery
74%
Display
73%
Games Performance
57 / 68 → 84%
Application Performance
87 / 92 → 94%
Temperature
95%
Noise
87%
Audio
50%
Camera
47 / 85 → 56%
Average
69%
77%
Office - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 联想 IdeaPad 310-15IKB 笔记本电脑简短评测
Benjamin Herzig, 2016-12-11 (Update: 2016-12-11)