
INNOCN CB32U1 评测:Apple Studio Display 的平价替代品?
颜色而非功能。
INNOCN CB32U1 凭借其 4K 分辨率、120 Hz 刷新率以及高色彩准确度,专为创意专业人士和 Mac 用户设计。在我们的评测中,这款 32 英寸显示器展现出了 IPS 面板中极为出色的高对比度,尽管在功能和做工方面做了一些妥协。Christian Hintze (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
总结——画质出色,附加功能较少
“Art Monitor”的色彩偏差极低,其出色的高对比度画面尤为突出,几乎让人联想到OLED显示屏。尽管配备背光,但仍能呈现深邃的黑色;色彩丰富且自然,整体画面令人赏心悦目,这些特点正是INNOCN的鲜明特征。 因此,它非常适合其设计初衷——照片和图形编辑。
与Apple Studio Display(亚马逊起售价1,449欧元)相比,它价格更为亲民,同时还拥有更大的屏幕和更高的刷新率(120 Hz 对比 60 Hz)。
不过,其亮度略低,且采用的是8位面板,而非真正的10位显示屏。 通过FRC技术模拟中间色调,使其能够呈现相同的10.7亿种颜色。其价格——约为Apple 显示器价格的三分之一——也是通过省略若干便利功能实现的,包括KVM切换器、扬声器、摄像头、麦克风、线缆管理以及旋转支持。
对于主要寻求色彩准确显示、且可以不依赖内置扬声器、网络摄像头以及与Apple 无缝集成的摄影师、平面设计师和Mac用户而言,INNOCN可以成为一款极具吸引力的低成本替代方案。
Pros
Cons
INNOCN 是一个中国显示器品牌,致力于提供高品质且性价比极高的面板。
该品牌最新推出的机型是CB32U1。这款被定位为“专业艺术显示器”的产品,主要面向艺术家和创意从业者,凭借其典雅的白色设计以及“Mac View”等营销术语,将自身定位为Apple 用户的更实惠替代选择。但它真的做到了吗?
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
机身与做工——设计优雅,但有一处小瑕疵
连接性
规格 - 4K、120 Hz 和 90 W USB-C
INNOCN 完全专注于画质。CB32U1 并未配备 KVM 切换器、内置扬声器或前文提到的旋转模式等附加功能。不过,其 USB-C 接口支持最高 90 W 的 Power Delivery 充电,可为 MacBook 等外部设备充电。 顶部边缘内置的环境光传感器可检测周围光线条件,并能自动调节亮度和蓝光强度,以减轻眼睛疲劳。
据制造商称,这款“专业级 4K 照片编辑显示器”的 DeltaE 值低于 1,并支持多种色彩空间,包括 99% DCI-P3 和 99% Adobe RGB。120 Hz 的刷新率旨在为创意项目提供更流畅的视觉体验。
| 规格 | 详情 |
| 面板 | IPS |
| 屏幕尺寸 | 32英寸 |
| 分辨率 | 4K (3,840 × 2,160) |
| 刷新率 | 120 Hz |
| 色域 | 100% sRGB、99% DCI-P3、99% Adobe RGB |
| 色彩 | 10.7亿色(8位 + FRC) |
| 功能 | 画中画模式、环境光传感器、90 W Power Delivery |
图像质量——适合照片编辑吗?
主观上,我们印象非常深刻:画面明亮,黑色深邃,色彩和对比度呈现得非常出色。所有内容都显示得极佳,没有任何明显的色彩失真。该显示器还提供了多种预设的色彩和图像模式以调整显示效果,包括“Mac视图”、“艺术设计”等选项。
经我们测量,在启用Display P3模式且亮度设为90%时,该显示器的亮度约为350尼特。遗憾的是,亮度从中心向边缘方向略有下降。当亮度设为100%时,INNOCN显示器在中心区域的亮度可达近400尼特。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 88 %
Contrast: 1427:1 (Black: 0.26 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 0.84 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.72}
calibrated: 0.84
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 1.3 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.97}
85.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
99.1% sRGB (Argyll 3D)
87.7% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.39
CCT: 6623 K
| INNOCN CB32U1 3840x2160, 32", 120 Hz | TITAN ARMY P275MV PLUS 3840x2160, 27", 160 Hz | KTC G27P6 OLED, 2560x1440, 27", 240 Hz | KTC H27P22s AUO 7.0, IPS, 3840x2160, 27", 160 Hz | Alienware AW2725DF x, 27", Hz | MSI MAG 274QRF QD E2 MAG 274QRF QD E2, IPS, 2560x1440, 27", 180 Hz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 4% | 0% | -1% | 5% | ||
| Display P3 Coverage (%) | 87.7 | 94.7 8% | 86.91 -1% | 86.9 -1% | 97.6 11% | |
| sRGB Coverage (%) | 99.1 | 100 1% | 99.23 0% | 99.8 1% | 99.7 1% | |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage (%) | 85.1 | 88.9 4% | 86.86 2% | 81.6 -4% | 88.9 4% | |
| Response Times | 68% | 97% | 64% | 73% | 78% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 32.4 ? | 12.8 ? 60% | 0.8 ? 98% | 11.8 ? 64% | 6.7 ? 79% | 5.76 ? 82% |
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 22 ? | 5.6 ? 75% | 0.8 ? 96% | 8 ? 64% | 7.4 ? 66% | 5.73 ? 74% |
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | 240 | |||||
| PWM Amplitude * (%) | 14 | |||||
| Screen | -53% | -148% | -124% | -24% | -197% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 371 | 305 -18% | 320 -14% | 454 22% | 520.3 40% | 453 22% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 347 | 296 -15% | 310 -11% | 398 15% | 493 42% | 404 16% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 88 | 92 5% | 93 6% | 79 -10% | 88 0% | 84 -5% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.26 | 0.34 -31% | 0.02 92% | 0.41 -58% | 0.45 -73% | 0.28 -8% |
| Contrast (:1) | 1427 | 897 -37% | 16000 1021% | 1107 -22% | 1156 -19% | 1618 13% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 0.84 | 2.15 -156% | 10.69 -1173% | 4.61 -449% | 1.8 -114% | 7.97 -849% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.32 | 4.16 -25% | 15.63 -371% | 8.04 -142% | 3.8 -14% | 14.32 -331% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.84 | 1.29 -54% | 4.11 -389% | 2.57 -206% | 1.4 -67% | 1.71 -104% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.3 | 3.21 -147% | 7.73 -495% | 4.77 -267% | 1.4 -8% | 8.2 -531% |
| Gamma | 2.39 92% | 2.52 87% | 2.2 100% | 2.28 96% | 1.46 151% | |
| CCT | 6623 98% | 6617 98% | 8070 81% | 7540 86% | 6743 96% | 7427 88% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 6% /
-24% | -17% /
-81% | -20% /
-71% | 25% /
-6% | -38% /
-115% |
* ... smaller is better
校准——出色的出厂设置
与泰坦军团的C49c1不同(我们的评测),Display P3显示器的出厂校准效果非常出色。使用ColorChecker测得的DeltaE值始终低于1,而灰度值也仅略高一些。因此,用户无需自行校准显示器,它就能以极高的精度还原色彩——这是图形和照片编辑的基本要求。
色彩空间
响应时间和闪烁现象
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 22 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 10.6 ms rise | |
| ↘ 11.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 49 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (19.8 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 32.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14.2 ms rise | |
| ↘ 18.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 44 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (31 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7763 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
功耗——亮度为90%时为40 W
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was given to the author by the manufacturer free of charge for the purposes of review. There was no third-party influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.






























