评测——三星 Galaxy Z Fold8
三星 Galaxy Z Fold8 是折叠屏智能手机日益证明其实用价值的令人印象深刻的典范。其更宽的屏幕比例、纤薄的设计和出色的显示屏，使其成为一款多功能的日常伴侣。其强大的配置同样令人印象深刻，不仅拥有长期的系统更新保障，还具备出色的电池续航能力。性能和通信能力也处于顶尖水平。
不过，Fold8 并非没有缺点。考虑到其高昂的售价，缺少长焦镜头尤其令人失望。此外，在持续高负载下，设备会出现明显的发热和严重的降频现象，扬声器表现也令人失望。不支持 S Pen 以及一些轻微的软件退步，都降低了整体使用体验。 此外，屏幕较低的PWM频率可能会让对此类问题敏感的用户感到困扰。起售价高达1,899美元，三星虽然推出了一款在技术上令人印象深刻的可折叠手机，但距离完美仍有差距。 对于真正能充分发挥其形态优势的用户而言，这是市面上功能最全面的智能手机之一；但对于其他用户来说，如此高昂的价格仍难以令人信服。
Pros
Cons
Table of Contents
- 评测——三星 Galaxy Z Fold8
- 规格参数 - 三星 Galaxy Z Fold8
- 案例——这完全取决于外形设计
- 特点 - 缺失内容极少
- 软件——Galaxy Z Fold8 的 7 年系统更新
- 通信与GNSS——Galaxy Z Fold 8 配备高速 Wi-Fi 7
- 电话功能与通话质量
- 相机——Galaxy Z Fold8 缺少长焦镜头
- 配件与保修 - Fold8 随附一条 USB 数据线
- 输入设备与操作——一款不支持 S Pen 的折叠屏手机
- 可折叠显示屏——亮度极高，但并非完美
- 封面显示——正面亮度超过 3,000 尼特
- 性能——Fold8 搭载了性能强劲的骁龙 SoC
- 排放量——Fold8 采用了先进的电池技术
- 电池续航时间
- Notebookcheck 总体评价
- 可能的替代方案对比
可折叠智能手机早已不再仅仅是技术上的新奇玩意。凭借Galaxy Z Fold8，三星旨在再次证明：智能手机既可以拥有更大的屏幕，又能具备更丰富的多功能性。新款Fold更薄、更轻、更宽，这些变化带来的实际影响远比乍看之下更为显著。 但 Fold8 真的能改善日常生活吗？我们对三星这款全新的旗舰折叠屏手机进行了全面测试。
规格参数 - 三星 Galaxy Z Fold8
案例——这完全取决于外形设计
三星 Galaxy Z Fold8 提供薰衣草色、石墨色和奶油色三种配色。此外，开心果色仅通过三星官方商店独家发售。三星这款最新折叠屏手机最突出的特点是其机身设计。 折叠状态下，它拥有宽阔的16:10屏幕比例，而展开状态则呈现4:3比例。尽管这种设计对媒体内容更为友好，但起初需要一些时间来适应。总而言之，我们很喜欢它。
Fold8握持舒适，给人一种高端设备的质感。 然而，在展开状态下受到扭力作用时，它很早就开始发出吱吱声。相反，在闭合状态下，它非常坚固。屏幕边框缝隙紧凑且均匀，但由于两颗显著突出的摄像头，当设备放置在光滑表面上时，会明显晃动，
Fold8 通过了 IP84 认证，这意味着它具备防水性能但不防尘。在测试过程中，折痕非常浅，几乎难以察觉，尽管不如 Find N6 的折痕那么不显眼。
特点 - 缺失内容极少
在功能配置方面，三星毫不妥协。设备搭载了高速 USB 3.2 接口和现代通信模块（包括 UWB）；唯一缺失的是对触控笔的支持。
Galaxy Z Fold8 提供三种存储容量版本：
- 12 GB / 256 GB，售价 1,899 美元
- 12 GB / 512 GB，售价 2,099 美元
- 16 GB / 1,024 GB，售价 2,499 美元
软件——Galaxy Z Fold8 的 7 年系统更新
三星 Galaxy Z Fold8 搭载 Google Android 17 和 One UI 9.0 系统发布，并计划提供长达七年的系统更新。这意味着该机型理论上将升级至 Android 24。
三星的 One UI 界面设计和操作体验令人倍感熟悉，并提供丰富多样的功能，包括通过 Galaxy AI 实现的 AI 功能。 其中部分 AI 功能可在本地运行，无需连接云端。虽然设备上不再预装任何微软应用，但包含了一些第三方应用，这些应用也可以卸载。
可持续发展
在可持续发展方面，三星再次表现得相对透明，在报告中详细披露了再生材料的使用比例以及具体材料种类。
外包装设计简洁，且不含塑料。Fold8目前尚未列入三星的自助维修计划，但预计很快就会加入其中。
通信与GNSS——Galaxy Z Fold 8 配备高速 Wi-Fi 7
三星 Galaxy Z Fold8 支持所有现代通信标准：5G Sub-6、Wi-Fi 7（6 GHz）、蓝牙 6.0、NFC 和 UWB。 对此无可挑剔，尤其是考虑到其5G频段覆盖范围广泛，且我们的测试表明Wi-Fi 7的速度非常快。
| Networking | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 | |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| Honor Magic V6 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Oppo Find N6 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Vivo X Fold6 | |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| Average of class Smartphone | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
Fold8 在户外实现了非常快速的卫星定位，但在室内进行相同操作时却耗时明显更长。在测试过程中，它还需要片刻时间才能精确定位我们的位置。
在一次骑行中，我们将这款折叠智能手机与 Garmin Venu 2 进行了对比。后者对行进路线的记录精度略高，特别是在急转弯处，而且很明显，Fold8 确定位置的频率较低。不过，就导航用途而言，它已经绰绰有余。
电话功能与通话质量
由于采用超薄设计，Galaxy Z Fold 8 仅支持一张 nano-SIM 卡。不过，它也支持双 eSIM 或混合模式运行。
将手机贴近耳朵时，双向通话的语音质量非常自然，且能有效抑制背景噪音。
相机——Galaxy Z Fold8 缺少长焦镜头
三星 Galaxy Z Fold8 内置的 1000 万像素前置摄像头虽不支持自动对焦，但仍能拍摄出不错的照片。不过，若使用主摄像头并将封面屏作为取景器，则能拍出效果更佳的自拍照。
两枚主镜头位于机身背面。 广角镜头采用了Galaxy S26（及S26+）中搭载的传感器，而超广角镜头则与S26 Ultra系列中的完全相同，同时兼具微距镜头功能。 不过，该机型未配备专用长焦镜头，尽管传感器内置变焦功能表现相当出色，但仍无法替代真正的长焦镜头。这两颗镜头在色彩还原方面表现自然，令人印象深刻，不过它们确实进行了显著的锐化处理。
Fold8 通过前置摄像头录制视频，最高支持 UHD 分辨率和 60 fps。 主摄像头同样支持此功能，并额外提供30帧/秒的8K录制选项。选择“专业模式”的用户可在超高清分辨率下实现最高120帧/秒的帧率，并支持PAL格式，这一功能实现现已比苹果iPhone上的功能更为全面。 将这款可折叠设备用作三脚架时，会因软件退化而受到一定影响。当Fold8部分折叠时，显示屏视图不再经过优化，导致取景器图像会横跨铰链的折痕。此外，铰链的刚性增强也使得精确对齐变得更加困难。
| 宽高比 | 解决方案 | |
|---|---|---|
| 图片 | 4:3 / 16:9 / 1:1 / 全屏 | 12 / 24** / 50 MPix |
| 视频（主摄像头） | 16:9 / 21:9* / 1:1 / 全屏 | 高清 (30 FPS) 全高清 (24* / 25* / 30 / 48* / 50* / 60 / 100* / 120* FPS)超高清 (24* / 25* / 30 / 48* / 50* / 60 / 100* / 120* FPS) 8K (24* / 25* / 30 FPS) |
| 视频（前置摄像头） | 16:9 / 21:9* / 1:1 / 全屏 | 高清（30 FPS）全高清（24* / 25* / 30 / 48* / 50* / 60 FPS）超高清（24* / 25* / 30 / 48* / 50* / 60 FPS） |
*仅限专业模式**
仅限相机助手
Image comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main cameraMain cameraUltra-wide-angle5x zoomLow light
配件与保修 - Fold8 随附一条 USB 数据线
Fold8 仅随附一条 USB-C 数据线。不过，三星还提供电源适配器、保护壳等配件。
在美国，Care+ 保险套餐提供为期 2 年的保障，月费分别为 5.50 美元、13 美元或 18 美元。
输入设备与操作——一款不支持 S Pen 的折叠屏手机
三星 Galaxy Z Fold 8 的电容式触摸屏工作非常可靠且响应迅速，尽管不支持三星的 S Pen 手写笔。
在生物识别安全方面，电源键中集成了指纹传感器，它通常能快速识别已注册的指纹，并高效运行。 此外，该按键功能多样，可在设置中进行配置。
线性振动马达提供清晰的反馈，且运行非常安静。
可折叠显示屏——亮度极高，但并非完美
Fold8 最引人注目的亮点无疑是其可折叠显示屏，其显示规格在同类产品中堪称卓越。从技术角度来看，它代表了最先进的水准，支持 1–120 Hz 的刷新率，并且在启用自动亮度控制的情况下，能够达到很高的亮度水平。 仅手动调节亮度的用户，其亮度上限为 419 cd/m²；若启用“额外亮度”选项，则可达 708 cd/m²。
该面板采用240至480 Hz的低频脉冲宽度调制（PWM）来调节亮度，对此类问题敏感的用户可能会感到不适。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 1406 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 2.4 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.7}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 2 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.95}
99.2% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.04
CCT: 6446 K
| Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 2448x1848, 7.6" | Honor Magic V6 OLED, 2352x2172, 8" | Oppo Find N6 OLED, 2480x2248, 8.1" | Vivo X Fold6 AMOLED, 2504x2312, 8" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 6% | -53% | -26% | |
| APL18 Peak Brightness (cd/m²) | 3152 | 1229 -61% | 1353 -57% | 2118 -33% |
| HDR Peak Brightness (cd/m²) | 3358 | 5773 72% | 1697 -49% | 2735 -19% |
| Response Times | 14% | 15% | -2% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 0.67 ? | 0.65 ? 3% | 0.52 ? 22% | 0.84 ? -25% |
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 1.14 ? | 0.84 ? 26% | 1.05 ? 8% | 1.1 ? 4% |
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | 240 | 120 | 180 | 90 |
| PWM Amplitude * (%) | 17.24 | 15.15 12% | 14.43 16% | 14.67 15% |
| Screen | 6% | 8% | 36% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 1406 | 1291 -8% | 1179 -16% | 1245 -11% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 1404 | 1184 -16% | ||
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 98 | 98 0% | ||
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | ||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.4 | 1.4 42% | 1.6 33% | 0.7 71% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.8 | 3.5 8% | 2.9 24% | 1.6 58% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2 | 2.4 -20% | 1.6 20% | 1.5 25% |
| Gamma | 2.04 108% | 2.26 97% | 2.24 98% | 2.19 100% |
| CCT | 6446 101% | 6804 96% | 6662 98% | 6390 102% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 9% /
8% | -10% /
-1% | 3% /
9% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 240 Hz Amplitude: 17.24 % Secondary Frequency: 480 Hz |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 240 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 240 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7662 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
一系列在固定缩放级别下、亮度设置不同的测量数据（最低亮度下的振幅曲线看似平坦，但这归因于比例缩放；插图中显示了最低亮度下振幅曲线的放大图）。
色彩还原水平非常高，但训练有素的观察者可能会发现绿色调中存在微小的偏差。不过，在日常使用中这一点并不明显。
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1.14 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.65 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.491 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (19.7 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 0.67 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.3685 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.303 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.13 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (30.8 ms). | ||
在户外，Fold8的表现非常出色，即使在强光下也能轻松阅读。
可视角度稳定性非常好。在宽可视角度下，亮度会略有下降，颜色也会显得有些褪色。
封面显示——正面亮度超过 3,000 尼特
正面显示屏在任何方面都不逊色于可折叠面板，并能提供出色的测量结果。
| Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 AMOLED, 1972x1248, 5.5" | Vivo X Fold6 2528x1120, 6.5" | Oppo Find N6 OLED, 2616x1140, 6.6" | Honor Magic V6 OLED, 2420x1080, 6.5" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -5% | -20% | -50% | 21% |
| APL18 Peak Brightness (cd/m²) | 3012 -4% | 2413 -23% | 1201 -62% | 2505 -21% |
| HDR Peak Brightness (cd/m²) | 3163 -6% | 2788 -17% | 2067 -38% | 5450 62% |
| Response Times | -2% | -29% | -14% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 1.13 ? -69% | 0.92 ? -37% | ||
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 1.35 ? -18% | 1.22 ? -7% | ||
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | 240 | 90 | 90 | |
| PWM Amplitude * (%) | 17.65 -2% | 17 1% | 17 1% | |
| Screen | ||||
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 1349 | 1401 | 1180 | 1909 |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 1362 | 1175 | ||
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 98 | 97 | ||
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | ||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.4 | 0.7 | 1.5 | 1.1 |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.8 | 1.6 | 2.7 | 2.7 |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2 | 1.2 | 2.2 | 2 |
| Gamma | 2.04 108% | 2.24 98% | 2.26 97% | 2.28 96% |
| CCT | 6517 100% | 6412 101% | 6710 97% | 6747 96% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -4% /
-4% | -25% /
-25% | -32% /
-29% | 21% /
21% |
* ... smaller is better
一系列在固定缩放级别下、亮度设置各异的测量数据（最低亮度下的振幅曲线看似平坦，但这仅是缩放比例所致；插图中展示了最低亮度下振幅曲线的放大图）。
性能——Fold8 搭载了性能强劲的骁龙 SoC
三星 Galaxy Z Fold8 搭载了高通骁龙 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy 处理器，可确保系统运行流畅，并轻松应对多任务处理。
然而，CPU 和系统基准测试显示，其性能有时会低于采用同一款 SoC 的其他智能手机。这很可能是由散热特性造成的。
| PCMark for Android - Work 3.x | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy (n=1) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (4507 - 28557, n=133, last 2 years) | |
| Oppo Find N6 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 | |
| Antutu v11 - Score | |
| Oppo Find N6 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy (3002918 - 3882009, n=2) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 | |
| Average of class Smartphone (584158 - 4273120, n=37, last 2 years) | |
| UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy (23810 - 25289, n=2) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2895 - 78695, n=97, last 2 years) | |
| AI Benchmark - Score V6 | |
| Oppo Find N6 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy (14629 - 21071, n=2) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 | |
| Average of class Smartphone (55.6 - 22780, n=80, last 2 years) | |
集成的 Adreno 840 图形芯片负责基于硬件的光线追踪，目前是智能手机中速度最快的 GPU 之一。
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
| 3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 | |
| Oppo Find N6 | |
| Vivo X Fold6 | |
| Honor Magic V6 | |
| 3DMark / Wild Life Extreme | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 | |
| Oppo Find N6 | |
| Vivo X Fold6 | |
| Honor Magic V6 | |
| 3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 | |
| Oppo Find N6 | |
| Honor Magic V6 | |
| Vivo X Fold6 | |
| 3DMark / Solar Bay Score | |
| Vivo X Fold6 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 | |
| Honor Magic V6 | |
| Oppo Find N6 | |
| 3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score | |
| Vivo X Fold6 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 | |
| Honor Magic V6 | |
| Oppo Find N6 | |
| 3DMark / Solar Bay Extreme Score | |
| Vivo X Fold6 | |
| Honor Magic V6 | |
| Oppo Find N6 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 | |
| 3DMark / Solar Bay Extreme Unlimited Score | |
| Oppo Find N6 | |
| Vivo X Fold6 | |
| Honor Magic V6 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 | |
| 3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | |
| Vivo X Fold6 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 | |
| Oppo Find N6 | |
| Honor Magic V6 | |
| 3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score | |
| Vivo X Fold6 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 | |
| Oppo Find N6 | |
| Honor Magic V6 | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 | |
| Oppo Find N6 | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen | |
| Oppo Find N6 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 | |
| GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 | |
| Oppo Find N6 | |
| GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen | |
| Oppo Find N6 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 | |
| GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 | |
| Oppo Find N6 | |
| GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen | |
| Oppo Find N6 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 | |
| GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 | |
| Honor Magic V6 | |
| Oppo Find N6 | |
| GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen | |
| Oppo Find N6 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 | |
| Honor Magic V6 | |
| GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 | |
| Vivo X Fold6 | |
| Honor Magic V6 | |
| Oppo Find N6 | |
| GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
| Oppo Find N6 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 | |
| Honor Magic V6 | |
| Vivo X Fold6 | |
| GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 | |
| Vivo X Fold6 | |
| Honor Magic V6 | |
| Oppo Find N6 | |
| GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 | |
| Oppo Find N6 | |
| Vivo X Fold6 | |
| Honor Magic V6 | |
| GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 | |
| Oppo Find N6 | |
| Honor Magic V6 | |
| Vivo X Fold6 | |
| Jetstream 2 | |
| 2.0 Total | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy (340 - 423, n=2) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 (Chrome 151) | |
| Vivo X Fold6 (Chrome 151) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (63.9 - 423, n=113, last 2 years) | |
| 2.2 Total | |
| Honor Magic V6 (Chrome 149) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy (337 - 430, n=3) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 (Chrome 151) | |
| Vivo X Fold6 (Chrome 151) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2 - 480, n=95, last 2 years) | |
| Oppo Find N6 (Chrome 147) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 (Chrome 151) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy (105762 - 109098, n=2) | |
| Oppo Find N6 (Chrome 147) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (6015 - 126661, n=135, last 2 years) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Average of class Smartphone (281 - 2718, n=118, last 2 years) | |
| Oppo Find N6 (Chrome 147) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 (Chrome 151) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy (281 - 295, n=3) | |
| WebXPRT 5 - Overall | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 (Chrome 151) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy (n=1) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (23 - 104, n=19, last 2 years) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 | Honor Magic V6 | Oppo Find N6 | Vivo X Fold6 | Average 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 72% | 64% | 31% | 20% | -4% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s) | 3837.61 | 3921.41 2% | 3861.06 1% | 1440.32 -62% | 3615 ? -6% | 2292 ? -40% |
| Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s) | 2079.58 | 3992.25 92% | 3531.83 70% | 1424.84 -31% | 2641 ? 27% | 1972 ? -5% |
| Random Read 4KB (MB/s) | 526.14 | 411.38 -22% | 446.52 -15% | 372.99 -29% | 391 ? -26% | 316 ? -40% |
| Random Write 4KB (MB/s) | 211.94 | 667.68 215% | 637.68 201% | 734.36 246% | 394 ? 86% | 362 ? 71% |
排放量——Fold8 采用了先进的电池技术
温度
在持续负载下，表面温度可能会显著升高，甚至已接近过热临界点。不过，在日常使用中，这款折叠屏设备从未发热。
在压力测试中，Fold8 还出现了严重的降频现象，导致性能在早期就有所下降。
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 51.1 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 51 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.9 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.
3DMark 压力测试
| 3DMark | |
| Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 | |
| Oppo Find N6 | |
| Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 | |
| Honor Magic V6 | |
| Oppo Find N6 | |
| Solar Bay Stress Test Stability | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 | |
| Oppo Find N6 | |
| Solar Bay Extreme Stress Test Stability | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 | |
| Oppo Find N6 | |
| Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 | |
| Honor Magic V6 | |
| Oppo Find N6 | |
发言人
扬声器的摆放位置设计得使其极少会被无意中遮挡。尽管如此，这些扬声器体型纤薄，性能却相当欠佳。即使在中等音量下，声音听起来也闷闷的、微弱，且缺乏精准度和清晰度。
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.9% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.3% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 34%, worst was 136%
Compared to all devices tested
» 33% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 59% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 136%
Honor Magic V6 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 15% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 77% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 34%, worst was 136%
Compared to all devices tested
» 36% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 136%
电池续航时间
功耗
Fold8 在空闲状态下的功耗较低。在满载运行时，尽管配备了大尺寸显示屏，其功耗却并不比 S26 Ultra 高。
| Off / Standby |   0.05 / 0.3 Watt |
| Idle |  0.66 / 1.5 / 1.6 Watt |
| Load |
14.79 / 15.47 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 4800 mAh | Honor Magic V6 6660 mAh | Oppo Find N6 6000 mAh | Vivo X Fold6 7000 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -9% | 5% | -1% | -2% | 10% | |
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 0.66 | 0.92 -39% | 0.79 -20% | 0.73 -11% | 0.63 ? 5% | 0.877 ? -33% |
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 1.5 | 1.39 7% | 1.6 -7% | 1.43 5% | 1.543 ? -3% | 1.462 ? 3% |
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 1.6 | 1.53 4% | 1.66 -4% | 1.55 3% | 1.7 ? -6% | 1.652 ? -3% |
| Load Average * (Watt) | 14.79 | 10.75 27% | 14.9 ? -1% | 6.85 ? 54% | ||
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 15.47 | 11.31 27% | 16 ? -3% | 11.2 ? 28% |
* ... smaller is better
功耗：Geekbench（150 cd/m²）
功耗：GFXbench（150 cd/m²）
电池续航时间
Galaxy Z Fold8 配备的 4,800 mAh 电池采用锂离子技术，并配备硅碳负极。尽管该电池容量不如竞争对手的设备，但得益于其高能效，这款折叠屏手机仍能实现出色的续航表现。
| Battery runtime - WiFi v1.3 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 | |
| Honor Magic V6 | |
| Oppo Find N6 | |
| Vivo X Fold6 | |
Notebookcheck 总体评价
Galaxy Z Fold8 是一款功能极其多样且做工精良的折叠屏手机。然而，鉴于其高昂的价格、缺少长焦镜头、扬声器音质欠佳以及存在降频问题，它仍是一款需要做出妥协的奢侈品。
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8
- 09/08/2026 v8
Daniel Schmidt
Total Sustainability Score: 可能的替代方案对比
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Drive | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 88.2%  | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 840 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 4.x | List Price: 1999€ | 201 g | 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 7.60" 2448x1848 404 PPI Dynamic AMOLED 2X |
2. 88.1%  | Honor Magic V6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 840 ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 4.x | Amazon: 1. $1,999.00 HONOR Magic V6 5G PNM-N49 (G... 2. $1,999.00 HONOR Magic V6 5G PNM-N49 (G... 3. $2,100.00 HONOR Magic V6 Dual-SIM 1TB ... List Price: 2300€ | 224 g | 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash | 7.95" 2352x2172 403 PPI OLED |
3. 86.4%  | Oppo Find N6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 840 ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 4.x | 225 g | 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash | 8.12" 2480x2248 412 PPI OLED | |
4. 87.6%  | Vivo X Fold6 MediaTek Dimensity 9500 ⎘ Arm Mali G1- Ultra MC12 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 4.x | Amazon: 1. $12.77 NEOYUKL Tempered Glass for V... 2. $21.49 TMHOPETRADE for vivo X Fold6... 3. $21.49 TMHOPETRADE for vivo X Fold6... | 235 g | 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash | 8.02" 2504x2312 425 PPI AMOLED |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Add as a preferred source on Google
