三星 Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra 评测
随着Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra的发布，三星首次在其可折叠手机产品线中引入了“Ultra”这一命名。然而从技术角度来看，与Fold7相比，其升级幅度远小于新名称所暗示的程度。 与去年的机型相比，我们在性能或功能上并未看到任何显著提升。
在我们看来，三星多年来为其S系列机型定义的典型“Ultra”特性在此款机型上缺失了。 首先，对触控笔的支持——这曾让 Fold 系列成为高效的生产力工具——本应是 Ultra Fold 机型的标配。此外，Galaxy S26 Ultra 的摄像头配置也未见踪影；取而代之的是，这款高端 Galaxy 折叠屏手机仅进行了微小的摄像头升级，尽管对于如此纤薄的手机而言，其成像质量依然令人惊叹。
总体而言，“Ultra”这一命名更像是针对苹果竞争的战略性先发制人举措，尽管iPhone Ultra尚未正式发布，且其机身设计更接近Fold8。
尽管如此，新一代Fold系列仍是一款顶级折叠屏手机。 机身质感极佳，全新的铰链设计更是无可挑剔。Fold8 Ultra 在系统更新和安全补丁的推送方面同样表现出色。
对于习惯了日常使用中这种非同寻常的方形宽高比的用户来说，很难找到比这更好的可折叠显示屏，尤其是因为这块8.0英寸的大尺寸OLED屏幕现在采用了新的防眩光涂层，清晰度比Fold7略高。 然而，像素密度的提升在我们的屏幕基准测试结果中，削弱了最新高通GPU的性能优势。
尽管电池容量较小，这款三星智能手机的续航表现依然出色；我们测得续航时间超过17小时。这表明，像One UI中那样的高效电源管理，可以在很大程度上弥补其与中国竞争对手相比在纸面上的电池容量不足。在轻度负载下，根据我们的测量，这款Galaxy手机的功耗始终保持在2瓦以下。
Pros
Cons
三星 Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra 的价格与供货情况
三星 Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra 提供石墨灰、奶油白和紫影三种配色，以及绿色阴影（三星独家）配色，建议零售价为 2,099 欧元起，Amazon.de 亦有销售。
三星 Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra 的规格参数
设计与功能——超薄安卓智能手机机身轻巧
Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra 给人留下了品质卓越的深刻印象。铰链运作顺畅且精准。开合角度调节范围广泛，且能可靠地保持在设定位置。
展开后，Fold8 Ultra 的厚度仅为 4.1 毫米，使其成为市面上最薄的折叠屏手机之一。 折叠后，其厚度与普通安卓旗舰机型相当。尽管屏幕面积较大，但机身重量仅为215克，依然轻盈非凡。然而，当平放在桌面上时，Fold8 Ultra 暴露了与 Fold7 相同的缺陷。由于摄像头模组的缘故，这款三星折叠屏手机在闭合状态下会明显晃动。
IP48认证提供了良好的防水性能，但无法完全阻隔细微灰尘。鉴于其复杂的铰链结构，这在使用过程中仍是一个风险因素——例如在海滩上——因为细小的沙粒会随着时间的推移影响设备的灵活性。
沟通与易用性——Galaxy手机的Flex Titanium技术让你完全忘记褶痕的存在——或者至少几乎如此
Fold8 Ultra 采用 Wi-Fi 7 技术（包括 6 GHz 频段），与我们的参考路由器配对时可实现极高的数据传输速率。在蜂窝网络方面，这款三星手机支持所有当前标准，提供广泛的频段覆盖和良好的通话质量。
解锁功能通过集成在侧边电源键中的指纹传感器实现，虽然响应迅速，但由于按键凹陷较深，按压时触感较弱。无论是 6.5 英寸的外屏 OLED 面板，还是 8 英寸的主显示屏，均不支持触控笔输入。不过，Dynamic AMOLED 2X 面板的折痕几乎难以察觉。
| Networking | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra | |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| Motorola Razr Fold | |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| Vivo X Fold6 | |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| Average of class Smartphone | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
相机——配备2亿像素摄像头和长焦镜头的超薄安卓手机
就拍照质量而言，Fold7的继任者并未实现真正的飞跃，因为在硬件方面几乎没有任何变化。只有超广角摄像头进行了传感器升级，不过尺寸的增加——从1/2.55英寸到1/2.52英寸——微乎其微。
不过，配备1/1.3英寸传感器和光学防抖（OIS）的2亿像素主摄像头在白天拍摄时效果非常出色。虽然轮廓显得略微过度锐化，但色彩表现对于智能手机而言堪称精准。 尽管对于Ultra系列机型而言传感器尺寸相对较小，但其低光环境下的成像质量依然非常出色。
考虑到Fold8的机身厚度，在如此纤薄的手机中搭载支持3倍光学变焦的潜望式长焦镜头实属难得。这让你能够拍摄出清晰锐利且人像效果出众的照片。不过，一旦超过3倍变焦，图像很快就会变得模糊且缺乏细节。
Image comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
显示屏——大尺寸 OLED 屏幕，PWM 调光功能受限
这款可折叠的8英寸主屏幕比Fold7的屏幕略微清晰一些，亮度也略高一些。不过，新款摩托罗拉Razr Fold的峰值亮度仍略胜一筹。
尽管如此，这款120Hz屏幕依然堪称一流，观看体验十分舒适——至少对于不介意典型OLED闪烁的用户而言是如此。三星目前仍未提供高频PWM调光功能。 在我们的示波器测量中，记录到的基频为240 Hz。在PWM调光模式下，最高仅达到480 Hz。
采用21:9宽高比的6.5英寸AMOLED外屏，其特性与主屏幕几乎相同。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Center on Battery: 1339 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 2.7 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.7}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 2.1 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.95}
97.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.02
CCT: 6456 K
| Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra AMOLED, 2504x2256, 8" | Motorola Razr Fold OLED, 2484x2232, 8.1" | Vivo X Fold6 AMOLED, 2504x2312, 8" | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 2184x1968, 8" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 14% | -22% | -15% | |
| APL18 Peak Brightness (cd/m²) | 2996 | 3568 19% | 2118 -29% | 2570 -14% |
| HDR Peak Brightness (cd/m²) | 3188 | 3466 9% | 2735 -14% | 2708 -15% |
| Response Times | -75% | -16% | -12% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 0.56 ? | 1.6 ? -186% | 0.84 ? -50% | 0.67 ? -20% |
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 1.21 ? | 1.3 ? -7% | 1.1 ? 9% | 1.4 ? -16% |
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | 240 | 180 | 90 | 240 |
| PWM Amplitude * (%) | 13.7 | 18 -31% | 14.67 -7% | 13.73 -0% |
| Screen | 32% | 40% | 6% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 1339 | 1236 -8% | 1245 -7% | 1311 -2% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | ||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.7 | 1 63% | 0.7 74% | 2.4 11% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.2 | 2.44 42% | 1.6 62% | 3.4 19% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.1 | 1.5 29% | 1.5 29% | 2.2 -5% |
| Gamma | 2.02 109% | 2.145 103% | 2.19 100% | 2.03 108% |
| CCT | 6456 101% | 6537 99% | 6390 102% | 6413 101% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 1307 | |||
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 95 | |||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -10% /
-8% | 1% /
7% | -7% /
-5% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 240 Hz Amplitude: 13.7 % Secondary Frequency: 480 Hz |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 240 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 240 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7665 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
在固定缩放级别下、不同亮度设置下的测量数据序列（尽管在最低亮度下振幅曲线看起来平坦，但这只是由于缩放比例所致。信息框中显示的是最低亮度下振幅的放大图。）
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1.21 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.6145 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.595 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (19.7 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 0.56 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.306 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.2505 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.13 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (30.8 ms). | ||
封面展示
| Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra AMOLED, 2520x1080, 6.5" | Vivo X Fold6 2528x1120, 6.5" | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 2520x1080, 6.5" | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 4% | -16% | -15% |
| APL18 Peak Brightness (cd/m²) | 3068 2% | 2413 -19% | 2600 -13% |
| HDR Peak Brightness (cd/m²) | 3334 5% | 2788 -13% | 2661 -17% |
| Response Times | -31% | -46% | -6% |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 0.9 ? -61% | 1.13 ? -102% | 0.66 ? -18% |
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 1.23 ? -2% | 1.35 ? -12% | 1.03 ? 15% |
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | 240 | 90 | 240 |
| PWM Amplitude * (%) | 17.92 -31% | 17 -24% | 15.59 -14% |
| Screen | |||
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 1271 | 1401 | 1348 |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | |||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.3 | 0.7 | 2.2 |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.6 | 1.6 | 2.9 |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.9 | 1.2 | 2.3 |
| Gamma | 2.06 107% | 2.24 98% | 2.04 108% |
| CCT | 6533 99% | 6412 101% | 6461 101% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 1346 | ||
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 94 | ||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -14% /
-17% | -31% /
-34% | -11% /
-9% |
* ... smaller is better
在固定缩放级别下，采用不同亮度设置进行的一系列测量（尽管在最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来平坦，但这只是缩放比例造成的。信息框中显示的是最低亮度下振幅的放大图。）
性能、排放与电池续航——三星折叠屏智能手机的速度超越竞争对手
如果您正在寻找一款高性能智能手机，Fold8 Ultra 尽管采用超薄设计，却依然能满足您的需求。得益于专为 Galaxy 系列定制的骁龙 8 Elite Gen 5 处理器，这款三星折叠屏手机在 Geekbench 测试中的表现实际上比荣耀 Magic V6 稍快，且显著优于 vivo X Fold6。 在使用小尺寸外屏时，GFXBench 屏幕测试中的帧率得分几乎翻倍（阿兹特克遗迹高难度模式：118 FPS）。
不过值得注意的是，即使在“正常”使用（浏览网页和观看 YouTube 视频）后，跑分结果也会明显下降。这一点在 3DMark Wild Life 压力测试中表现得尤为明显。从第一次测试到第二次测试，帧率就已经出现了明显的下降。
| Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra | Motorola Razr Fold | Vivo X Fold6 | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 | Average 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 63% | 29% | -26% | 15% | -8% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s) | 3878.5 | 3719.8 -4% | 1440.32 -63% | 4080.35 5% | 3615 ? -7% | 2278 ? -41% |
| Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s) | 2498.21 | 3758 50% | 1424.84 -43% | 2239.55 -10% | 2641 ? 6% | 1960 ? -22% |
| Random Read 4KB (MB/s) | 514.09 | 403.4 -22% | 372.99 -27% | 403.69 -21% | 391 ? -24% | 316 ? -39% |
| Random Write 4KB (MB/s) | 211.53 | 695.6 229% | 734.36 247% | 51.23 -76% | 394 ? 86% | 362 ? 71% |
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 50.7 °C / 123 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 50.4 °C / 123 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
3DMark 压力测试
| 3DMark | |
| Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 | |
| Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability | |
| Motorola Razr Fold | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.3% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 34%, worst was 136%
Compared to all devices tested
» 22% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 136%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 34%, worst was 136%
Compared to all devices tested
» 31% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 136%
| Off / Standby |   0.05 / 0.16 Watt |
| Idle |  0.67 / 1.95 / 2.17 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra 5000 mAh | Motorola Razr Fold 6000 mAh | Vivo X Fold6 7000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 4400 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -3% | 16% | 20% | 16% | 6% | |
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 0.67 | 1.1 -64% | 0.73 -9% | 0.63 6% | 0.63 ? 6% | 0.876 ? -31% |
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 1.95 | 1.3 33% | 1.43 27% | 1.48 24% | 1.543 ? 21% | 1.458 ? 25% |
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 2.17 | 1.7 22% | 1.55 29% | 1.55 29% | 1.7 ? 22% | 1.649 ? 24% |
* ... smaller is better
| Battery runtime - WiFi v1.3 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra | |
| Motorola Razr Fold | |
| Vivo X Fold6 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 | |
Notebookcheck 综合评分
喜欢方形机身设计的人会发现，Fold8 Ultra 是一款非常出色的折叠屏智能手机——尽管遗憾的是，它的价格也相当昂贵。
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra
- 09/05/2026 v8
Marcus Herbrich
Total Sustainability Score: 可能的替代方案比较
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Drive | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 88%  | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 840 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 4.x | Amazon: List Price: 2199€ | 215 g | 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 8.00" 2504x2256 421 PPI AMOLED |
2. 85.8%  | Motorola Razr Fold Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 829 ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 4.x | Amazon: List Price: 1999€ | 243 g | 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash | 8.10" 2484x2232 412 PPI OLED |
3. 87.6%  | Vivo X Fold6 MediaTek Dimensity 9500 ⎘ Arm Mali G1- Ultra MC12 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 4.x | Amazon: 1. $12.77 NEOYUKL Tempered Glass for V... 2. $21.49 TMHOPETRADE for vivo X Fold6... 3. $21.49 TMHOPETRADE for vivo X Fold6... | 235 g | 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash | 8.02" 2504x2312 425 PPI AMOLED |
4. 87.2%  | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 4.x | Amazon: List Price: 2099€ | 215 g | 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 8.00" 2184x1968 367 PPI Dynamic AMOLED 2X |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Add as a preferred source on Google
